2,278 words
Kelvin Pierce & Carole Donoghue
Sins of My Father: Growing Up with America’s Most Dangerous White Supremacist
Independently published, 2020
The white advocate who achieved both notoriety and prominence in the 1990s, William Luther Pierce, had twin sons by his first wife Patricia Jones. One of his sons, Kelvin Pierce, wrote a memoir of growing up a child of an extremely prominent pro-white political activist. The book is enlightening, but it is aligned with the mainstream zeitgeist of the time it was published, 2020, when white liberals were going bonkers over the death of George Floyd, a career Negro criminal.
The book draws from Robert S. Griffin’s account found in his biography, The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, but the aforementioned Summer of Floyd alignment narrative means that at no point is there a look at Pierce’s career from a detached, historical perspective. Instead, it shows Pierce as he was as a father and husband. According to Kelvin’s account, his father was distant and abusive. In the early part of his career as a white advocate, William Pierce was dependent upon the salary of Patricia.
Pierce was of Southern ancestry, born in 1933. His father was an alcoholic who died after drunkenly walking in front of a car driven by a teenager who couldn’t stop in time. Pierce’s mother, Marguerite, was a domineering woman who had a difficult time showing affection. After the death of Pierce’s father, Marguerite drifted about, finally settling in Texas. Pierce’s last two years of high school were at a military-style boarding school.
As a boy, Pierce liked model rockets, chemistry sets, and the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs. Pierce also had a brilliant mind, and he was admitted to Rice University on a full scholarship and graduated with a degree in physics. After making it through Rice, he went on to graduate school in Caltech where he was an active outdoorsman and small plane pilot. He met his wife Patricia in 1956 after the she and the other young women working at the local AT&T office come to a dance at Caltech. On their first date, William and Patricia were both nearly killed by train when Pierce risked crossing the tracks just as a train came by. They married on Thanksgiving Day in 1956.
By Kelvin’s account, his parent’s marriage was a problem from the get-go. Pierce deceptively manipulated the situation to get Patricia back to school although she wanted to continue to work. After she became pregnant, the doctor who confirmed her pregnancy drove her home since Pierce was going to drive them both home on his scooter. Pierce crashed his scooter on the way back while Patricia and the doctor looked at the scene from the doctor’s car. Meanwhile, Peirce was thrown out of Caltech, but transferred to the University of Colorado in Boulder, earning a Ph.D. there in 1962.
Pierce was offered two jobs that year, the first at Michigan State, the second at Oregon State, he picked Oregon because it was closer to his wife’s family. On the way to Oregon from Colorado, he became frustrated by the crying of the two boys and locked them and his wife out of the hotel room while he was sleeping after a day of driving. This was the point when William and Patricia’s marriage started its nosedive. While in Oregon, Pierce took notice of the first social revolution of the 1960s – that being the liberal, “civil rights” revolution whose rotten high point was the deceptive “I Have a Dream” speech delivered by the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. on August 28, 1963.
This revolution was fully formed and achieved victories by 1948, but these victories were uncontested. Only far-sighted people, often politically active women, noticed the growing black political machine within the Democratic Party of the time. The Jewish Question was likewise hidden. Even well-read, politically active men who were face-to-face with communism, such as Lieutenant Colonel Jack Mohr, were unaware of the anti-white racial and ethnic attack ongoing in the early 1960s. Pierce claimed he was an “ideological virgin” until he was thirty, in 1963. Kelvin writes,
[…] at that time [Pierce] would have been properly categorized as a libertarian because of his “vague feeling that people should be left alone as much as possible.” While he felt that blacks should be allowed to do whatever they wanted, he also felt that whites who didn’t want to eat with them, hire them or send their kids to school with them should not be forced to do so. They were contradictory positions, and the media didn’t help because they were solidly on the side of the blacks and using every piece of propaganda in their arsenal to sway the public, he believed. He also saw that the “shrillest and pushiest” of those demanding equality were not blacks but another minority group, “which raised for the first time in my life the Jewish question,” he said. He had learnt in military school that there was no such thing as inherent human equality. The 500 students at his school were white but differed enormously. “Some of my classmates were boys of intelligence, character and sensitivity; others were the scum of the earth; and the rest were at various points in between.” He concluded that blacks were “manifestly different from whites,” and the question was not one of equality, but what the proper relationship between the two races should be.
William Luther Pierce’s conversion to white advocacy at this time is the start of a trend, the second social revolution of the 1960s, in which Old-Stock Americans reacted to the previous social revolution which was Jewish led, technocratically implemented, semi-communist and pro-integrationist. Most American whites participated in this second revolution through a revived Protestantism or Reaganite conservativism. Some, however, became pro-white activists. General Ted Walker, for example, was the senior military officer who integrated Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas with armed paratroopers in 1957. By 1962, he was leading protests against integration as a private citizen.
Pierce first joined the anti-communist John Birch Society, but left after three months. During that time he had watched a televised speech by George Lincoln Rockwell and becoming intrigued by his ideas. Pierce corresponded with Rockwell and eventually met him. In 1965, Pierce moved his family to Connecticut to work for the Pratt & Whitney Company, however he decided to move the family again to northern Virginia to work as a writer for Rockwell’s magazine National Socialist World in July of 1966.
Kelvin shows that Pierce’s mother, Marguerite, had similar views to Pierce’s. Her father had died young, and her mother went on to marry a Jew who behaved poorly and molested Marguerite. The Jew stepfather died young also. Marguerite critiqued Rockwell’s magazine as well as Pierce’s articles. Kelvin writes about Marguerite,
Stop going on about the man, she said. “Hitler is presumably dead and buried. People have been brain-washed about him for twenty years, more or less. HE IS NOT THE ISSUE, NOR IS HIS HISTORY THE STORY YOU HAVE TO TELL. Besides capitals, that statement needs underscoring and bold lettering. The story you have to tell is HISTORY ITSELF.” Dad should be writing a book telling the story of “Jewish conniving from beginning to end – or present,” she said. “Tell it in an interesting, readable style. Don’t be too intellectual for the general public, but, principally, DON’T ADOPT THE STYLE OF ROCKWELL by haranguing and trying to arouse the ignorant….” With all the information and intelligence Dad possessed, and the writing ability he demonstrated, he could influence a lot of people. “But believe me, honey, you’ve got to forget Hitler. Let him take his place in your historical account, but quit trying to make the world worship him,” she urged.
Rockwell was murdered by one of his former followers in 1967. After his death, Rockwell’s followers fought over the remains of the organization. Unfortunately for Pierce, he’d was a member and was swept up in the unpleasant fighting.
Pierce was involved with Willis Carto because he had joined Carto’s group, the National Youth Alliance which was dissolving into factions aligned with George Wallace, Francis Parker Yockey, and loyalists of Willis Carto. To explain it very simply, Pierce eventually took over a faction of the National Youth Alliance and renamed it the National Alliance. He also came up with the Norse Life Rune as its symbol.
Before creating the National Alliance however, he had a bitter falling out with Willis Carto. During the feud with Carto, which mostly played out through the courts “Carto’s men” became a threat to Pierce’s small collection of followers in Arlington. One day, two young men were told by Pierce to look after Kelvin and his brother, and they went on an exciting “car chase” trying to get away from “Carto’s men.” When they returned, the brothers attempted to tell Pierce the story, but he didn’t care. As always, Pierce was lost in his own thoughts.
Carto also had problems with William F. Buckley, the housebroken “man of the right” who could act like a Pope, ex-communicating people and groups from respectable bounds of debate through editorials his magazine the National Review. In that publication, Buckley did an exposé on the web of organizations which Carto funded, such as the Liberty Lobby. It set back genuine far right activists just as whites started to organize against bussing of sub-Saharans and other “civil rights” oppressions.
Meanwhile, Kelvin was growing into manhood. He had a falling out with his father over joining his school’s football team. After that, the physical abuse stopped. He was also embarrassed when he gave a sympathetic presentation on Hitler to his class. The teacher was a World War II veteran who ridiculed Kelvin’s revisionist interpretation of the man. This was before the internet opened many eyes to alternatives to the “aggression at Munich” paradigm and the Jewish-spun lies that led to the Iraq War making revisionism look better. Kelvin was on his own in front of his sneering peers and hostile teacher.
Kelvin went off to college where he shifted from his tenuous support for his father’s beliefs to a mild liberalism. (Kelvin had actually been beaten by a black at one point but didn’t put the beating into a larger context or draw rational conclusions from it.) William and Patricia divorced in Kelvin’s senior year in college.
By the time that Kelvin had gone off to college, Pierce wrote The Turner Diaries under the pen-name Andrew Macdonald. The book is an extended flashback about a revolutionary group called The Organization who fight against “The System” which mostly represented the arrangement of society in the 1970s and 1980s under “civil rights” rules and norms. The book was first serialized in Pierce’s magazine, Attack!. It was later printed in book form, which sold 500,000 copies. Kelvin believes the only reason why Pierce went to his college graduation was that he was in town to discuss matters with the publisher of The Turner Diaries.
The Turner Diaries is what its left wing and mainstream critics say – a fantasy of violence and revolution. Pierce really did inspire Robert Mathew’s group The Order to carry out different crimes. It also served as the technical blueprint for Timothy McVeigh’s bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in 1995. Pierce also published materials on how to manufacture bombs and such. Ironically, those instructions were lifted from leftist publications. Most political violence comes from the left.
Pierce really did inspire white advocates to carry out violent deeds. Kelvin doesn’t mention this, but Pierce also propagated Nordicism in its worst form, instead of one drop of Nordic blood making any Caucasian a Nordic – one drop of non-Nordic blood made any Caucasian non-Nordic. Pierce was also hostile to Christianity, and he developed a religion called Cosmotheism to counter it.
Pierce eventually decided to purchase property in rural West Virginia to set up a new community. It is almost certain he purchased the property there from money donated by Mathew’s which he acquired by robbing an armored vehicle. This was never plausibly proven however, and the FBI looked under every rock. Pierce’s life with his sons was over at this point. In West Virginia, his advocacy increased, and many of his ideas about the FBI’s support for an unjust establishment, Zionism, and race-mixing have moved from the fringes in the 1990s to nearly the mainstream today.
After divorcing, Pierce went through a series of relationships. He married several Eastern European women whom he met through personal ads. These relationships ended in divorce and there were no children. Kelvin shows that his father had an American mistress in his final years. She wanted to have children with him, but Pierce had had a vasectomy. Pierce came down with an aggressive form of cancer and passed away in 2002. Kelvin attended the funeral. Pierce’s followers were at the funeral and were kind, but Kelvin couldn’t get past Peirce’s less-than-stellar fathering.
There are no unsuccessful white advocates, but all have some flaws. Pierce’s biggest flaw was his fascination with violent revolution. Another Silent Generation white advocate, Richard Kelly Hoskins, was also bedazzled by imagined shootouts. Neither sought to inspire sympathetic followers to rise to the top of their respective trades or professions and from there tip society in a pro-white direction, to be a federal judge rather than stand before one.
Pierce was also unable to successfully appoint a successor to the National Alliance. Kelvin describes the problems which followed his death. There was probably no way to appoint a successor who could continue the organization without destructive in-fighting. White advocacy is a warlord culture, a single, brilliant man can forgo his family and any scientific and industrial career to create an organization, but his followers rarely can duplicate such feats.
61 comments
I think the case for The Turner Diaries being the sourcebook for the militia-oriented movement of the White Power groups in the 1970s and 1980s may be over-state here. The simple truth is that Vietnam War veterans came home radicalized by their association with negro soldiers and the war they had fought was considered illegitimate by many. And, then, of course, there’s the very traditional and mainstream rhetoric of America’s violent revolution against the British empire.
The Turner Diaries is racial revenge fiction. Pierce didn’t invent the genre, he didn’t even invent the White racial revenge fiction genre. But he did create the first White racial revenge novel in a long time, and, clearly, there was pent-up demand for that kind of story.
You don’t sell 500,000 copies (and get read by far more readers than that) to the tiny fraction of society that will rob armored cars.
As for Timothy McVeigh and the destruction of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, I seriously doubt we have the whole story and I seriously doubt the ‘blueprint’ for that event came from The Turner Diaries.
The Weather Underground was blowing up buildings long before White Power groups were trying to do so.
“I think the case for The Turner Diaries being the sourcebook for the militia-oriented movement of the White Power groups in the 1970s and 1980s may be over-state here.”
I’m not sure who is overstating this.
Although you could find ads for it in the Spotlight tabloid, published by Liberty Lobby, which Tim McVeigh read and had purchased a telephone credit card from, if I remember correctly, I found The Turner Diaries to be interesting, just monumentally unrealistic.
And most of the militia types were not exactly rocket scientists, which is as generous as I can put it. Dr. Pierce should have probably left the generalship to the generals if TD was anything other than entertainment. I can’t fault him for writing an interesting novel.
The militia movement was mostly about tax protestors and Libertarian types who were wholly unsuited for political organizing. The Gordon Kahl tax protestor shootout in 1983 is a burgeoning point for significant militia-related thinking that I can remember, but militia movements were nothing if not inchoate.
In 1984, there was the asassination of the insufferably-obnoxious Jewish talk radio host, Alan Berg in Denver. I had heard his radio program a few times as far away as Idaho, and I know exactly how he was.
But Berg’s assassination by some of the most not-so-gifted White crusaders set the stage for a whole series of counterproductive “revolutionary” activities including robbing armored cars. This and the general promotion of the Skinhead punk aesthetic, in my opinion, set White Nationalism back at least forty years.
“As for Timothy McVeigh and the destruction of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City, I seriously doubt we have the whole story and I seriously doubt the ‘blueprint’ for that event came from The Turner Diaries.”
I disagree. I understood at the time (1995) before very much was known about this bombing that it was a page torn straight out of the TD. Tim McVeigh was another non-rocket surgeon who had lots of energy but no real leadership behind him, and he was way out of his league as a revolutionary.
I can’t say that I am sympathic to Janet Reno and the Feds who did the Waco disaster, which inspired McVeigh’s revenge attack ─ but McVeigh pretty much checks off all the boxes of what not to do for White advocacy and activism. And McVeigh himself was extremely naïve and obtuse about what he had hoped to gain with the OKC truck bombing, and what it was supposed to accomplish for White people. He probably had no clue himself.
“The Weather Underground was blowing up buildings long before White Power groups were trying to do so.”
I don’t think this is too relevant unless you mean in comparison to the utterly absurd claim that White Supreemists are the ones causing all the political or whatever violence in the country ─ a narrative that has been stated from time to time by various clueless Democrap officials.
My objection here with the talk of militias and the TD, is that George Lincoln Rockwell already paved the way ahead by understanding fifty years of Conservative political failure (now make it over a hundred). Rockwell was reinventing his approach to White Power and had already renamed his organization from the Armerican Nazi Party to the National Socialist White People’s Party and envisioned more strategically-focused White advocacy and political activism.
The problem with the militia types and the Turner Diaries enthusiasts is that they are too linearly-focused and did not understand or have never heard of Rockwell’s Legal, Psychological and Political Warfare (1966), an unfinished textbook if you will for revolutionary change, but without attempting to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Change for its own sake was hardly what General Washington wanted in 1776. Likewise, Rockwell did not write an Anarchist’s Bible.
If Rockwell had a fault, I would say that it was his belief that misfits and losers only needed a little proper fathering and then they would square up into decent White people. Well, sometimes ─ but arguably that got him killed.
Sometimes you just have to separate the wheat from the tares, at least when you are doing political organization on a shoestring. The Commander should have done a heavily front-loaded screening and vetting process, but what can be said in a time of shoestring organization where leaflets, rallies, and speaking dates on college campuses had to do the work that we have of the entire Internet. To his credit, Rockwell did say that he tolerated no talk about illegal and violent activities, and he was not somebody likely to be maneuvered into missteps by Feds. Right Wingers step into such minefields incessantly.
During the Weimar period in Germany there had been many Putsch attempts, from Kapp in Berlin to the Beer Hall in Munich, and various Communist coups of varying severity. All were put down by the Weimar Republic, and such regimes can usually muster up what they need to to put down pitchfork and barricade plots.
After learning a big lesson and spending a year in prison at Landsberg, Hitler resolved to come to power by legitimate means, which he did, taking advantages of the mistakes of his opponents who were wedded to false doctrines.
Democracy-Capitalist regimes are very good at maintaining stability and holding onto their power in the face of chaos, but they are not so good at correcting systemic problems other than to kick the proverbial can down the road.
Somebody needs to write a new political manual in the spirit of Rockwell and his Legal, Psychological & Political Warfare. It should be somebody who is a lawyer with the necessary legal experience fighting the usual interest groups like the ADL and the SPLC, and competently schooled with the essentials of pro-active White lawfare.
But this might as well be waiting for Santa Claus.
🙂
This is the relevant passage from The Turner Diaries:
“I packed about four pounds of blasting gelatin into an applesauce can, primed it, placed the batteries and timing mechanism in the top of the can, and wired them to a small toggle switch on the end of the 20 foot extension cord. When we load the truck with explosives, the can will go in back, on top of the two case of blasting gelatin. We’ll have to poke two small holes in the walls of the trailers of the cab to run the extension cord and the switch into the cab.” (BTW: that’s some fine writing, put Hemingway in the shade.)
McVeigh was buying TTD (and Hunter) for ten dollars and selling them for five at gun shows. He was a one-man band and proselyte for the books. There were passages of the book TTD found in his car. He left a message on Pierce’s answering machine. There is no question that Pierce influenced McVeigh right down to the technical details of the bomb. But that does not make Pierce guilty (legally or morally) of anything. Any more than Renaud Camus was responsible for the New Zeeland mass murderer or Salinger was guilty of Lennon and Reagan.
Being fixated on violent revolution may be a flaw, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with violent revolution. If you are prepared for and capable of fighting, prepared to effectively fill the vacuum that would follow success, and fighting in service of a righteous cause, then you should fight.
If you can win, it sure beats putting your fate in the hands of corrupt and self-serving politicians.
VERY interesting article! Pierce was probably the most INTELLIGENT white nationalist we have ever had, based on receiving a scholarship to Rice and then getting into Caltech. (Although Oliver had to be close—why do I feel there has been a falling off among us?). So Pierce’s leaving Caltech was not voluntary, eh? I’ve often wondered about that. What’s the story there? Did the book go into that? I wonder if this experience somehow sharpened his personal animosity against Ashkenazim, who must have been prevalent there at that time?
So say Pierce was a voracious reader and had many books at his compound. I wonder what was the thrust of his reading interest? Does the book touch on that?
Kelvin is named after Lord Kelvin, I guess? I would like to read this book, but I always order them and never read them.
That’s definitely not true, although Mr. Pierce is a clever man. Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Madison Grant, Lothrop Stoddard, William Shockley, … ? That’s just the first five who came to my mind. I can name many more, and here we are dealing only with America.
Or do you need a combination of strictly political activism with scholarship? 😉 Our (Russian) academic I.R. Shafarevich became prominent both as a scientist (PhD in algebraic topology at 19, Doctor of Sciences at 23, member of the Soviet Academy of Sciences at 28, his own scientific school etc.) and a political nationalist, not counting a plethora of other activities (he wrote a lot of great works on history, cultural criticism etc.). It’s just one example, I personally know a lot of other people who pass as “White Nationalist” and have done more in scientific field than Dr. Pierce.
And then, being admitted to Caltech is not an achievement. It’s just a university with an overblown reputation.
While Dr. Pierce is a great man, you should be embarrassed if you don’t know others beside him.
Well, to answer your question, Shockley was definitely great, but I would style him more of an HBDer, more grouped with someone like Charles Murray in our current milieu. I imagine Shockley would have been very allergic to any discussion of the jq—he was probably civnat—a great figure for race realism, but not quite what I refer to here.
Dr. Shockley is a scientist, and it’s natural for him not to discuss certain things publicly. Given that the environment in his profession is like a cage with tigers, talking about JQ would mean inviting all Jewish organisations to steamroll him (while his colleagues would be just watching). Actually, he did much more for the public than you would expect from a Nobel Prize winner.
And then, it was Cold War. The overall political atmosphere meant that something like repatriations of Negroes was off the table. (How convenient!) If you could have a normal nationalist party then, much more people would have come forward.
Generally, people understand a lot more than they seem. I don’t know about Americans, but, for example, German scientists tend to have an understanding of things like JQ if you speak privately.
Definitely, the more courageous people like Dr. Pierce act and speak out, the more others will support them.
I imagine Shockley did understand more than he let on, but we have to take him by his public position, all speculation is moot. Actually Kevin macdonald might be smarter than pierce, I just have physics envy.😉
But can you think of anybody in the younger generations anywhere near that caliber?
so I answered one of the questions for myself after downloading the book. It says he “breezed through courses” (does that mean he didn’t have trouble or that he did really well I don’t know) but that at caltech didn’t make the transition to research very well and partied a lot and was given to drunkenness. basically science graduate school involves a period of hard graduate level classes, which are very condensed, and then research in individual labs where you do actual experiments and write your PhD thesis. Actually, I’ve known people like this who are brilliant in coursework, but then didn’t make the transition to scientific research, which is often more akin plumbing or something than classes. it says that the dean of Caltech actually tried to intervene to prevent him from transferring to Boulder, which sounds unusual. I wonder, could this have been our eternal benefactors already trying to submarine him at this early stage?
Kelvin Pierce’s book is not recommended as a Fathers Day gift unless by a son who hates his daddy.
—
DarkPlato: May 27, 2025 …So say Pierce was a voracious reader and had many books at his compound. I wonder what was the thrust of his reading interest? Does the book touch on that?
—
Don’t expect an answer to your question from Pierce’s lost son or by the reviewer of his ghost-written (by the ADL or SPLC) smear book.
BTW, we in the Alliance never repeated the enemy’s word compound to describe our campus. Jewish “hate” watchdog groups like the above-mentioned ones that exploited and paid Kelvin to write his disgraceful book. Others of their ilk do like to use the word compound to conjure up a negative image of those groups, especially White advocacy ones, that they hate and vow to destroy. WikiJews say:
In military science, a compound is a type of fortification made up of walls or fences surrounding several buildings in the center of a large piece of land. The walls can either serve the purpose of being tall, thick, and impenetrable, in which case they would be made of wood, stone, or some other like substance; or dangerous to attempt to scale, in which case they could be made of barbed wire or electrified. Compounds can be designed to double as living spaces and military structures in the middle of hostile territory or as a military area within a country’s territory; they are also used by those who want to protect against threats to themselves or their property... Due to their offensive imagery and paraphernalia, large neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups will operate secluded compounds that can serve as a headquarters for a certain organization. In this particular movement, they are also used to hold gatherings and serve as venues for Nazi punk, Rock Against Communism and White power music concerts.The most famous of these would be the now-defunct Aryan Nations compound in Hayden Lake, Idaho…
Mr. Van de Camp concludes his review of this trash book with:
Pierce was also unable to successfully appoint a successor to the National Alliance… There was probably no way to appoint a successor who could continue the organization without destructive in-fighting. White advocacy is a warlord culture, a single, brilliant man can forgo his family and any scientific and industrial career to create an organization, but his followers rarely can duplicate such feats.
Really? White advocacy is a warlord culture? Do those at Counter-Currents believe that?
Many organizations go through a period of “destructive infighting” once the founder of the group dies, and, predictably, Pierce’s National Alliance certainly expierienced some conflicts amongst its membership after he died. However, the Alliance has been under responsible leadership for over a decade now and is back on a firm Piercean Path, guided by his teachings. There are plenty of groups that have eventually managed to grow and prosper after the group’s founder dies.
Dr. Pierce was no warlord and neither am I as the current NA Chairman. The legal thriller, coauthored by me and my wife, found here for $20, explains how I purchased Dr. Pierce’s personal research library from his successor, became NA Chairman, then fought off several coup attempts and criminal charges to save the Alliance: “Pocahontas Show Trial by William W. Williams” at cosmotheistchurch.org
Morris, if you knew anything about the National Alliance, which would be more than Kelvin knew, you would be aware that Dr. Pierce never intended to name his successor: he made clear to everyone for years that the duty to name his successor would fall to the NA board of directors. He was not unable to name one.
“Neither sought to inspire sympathetic followers to rise to the top of their respective trades or professions and from there tip society in a pro-white direction, to be a federal judge rather than stand before one.”
Exactly! Bob Mathew’s The Order tried violent revolution, or at least a couple of robberies to finance “the movement” but either failed because of it’s violence or in the words of Gary Yarbrough, failed because they were a mixture of Christians and others.
Dr Bella Dodd who converted from communism to Catholicism claimed that in the 1950’s approximately 800 young male communists joined the church to become priests and undermine the last bastion against communism from within. The answer, or the next trial, would be for young white people to be encouraged “to rise to the top of their respective trades or professions and tip society in a pro-white direction.”
wolfemu: May 27, 2025 …Bob Mathew’s The Order tried violent revolution, or at least a couple of robberies to finance “the movement” but either failed because of it’s violence or in the words of Gary Yarbrough, failed because they were a mixture of Christians and others.
—
Interesting. If Yarbrough said that, he was right.
Mathews, as a former National Alliance member and devout follower of Pierce prior to resigning his NA membership to declare his abortive war on the System, was a Cosmotheist. Yarbrough was the only member of the Order who had a previous criminal record. He was a devout follower of Christian Identity and was recruited by Mathews along with others from Pastor Butler’s Church of Jesus Christ Christian aka Aryan Nations. Mathews couldn’t have possibly recruited his crew only from NA,
One of the first things I did as editor of Ben Klassen’s Church tabloid Racial Loyalty in 1988 was to correspond with as many surviving, imprisoned Order members as I could find. David Lane was one who corresponded back. He told me that he and Mathews had read Klassen’s White Man’s Bible and that both of them thoroughly enjoyed it. Yarbrough had apparently received an issue of the decidedly anti-Christian Racial Loyalty tabloid that I’d mailed with each letter.
Yarbrough wrote back a threatening letter, telling me that “You had better watch out whose toes you step on.” I wasn’t upset by his threat, because we’d received several positive responses from other Order members who were not CI, and, besides, Gary was in prison for life, so why worry? I wrote back to him a conciliatory response, but ended it, with, “Gary, we have our way and you have Yahweh.”
I am not going to read this book, it is nothing but a “smear job” focused on besmirching a great man. It appears Kelvin was trying to cash in on his father’s celebrity— an idea advanced by some jewish publicists. It is easy to embellish trivial incidents, and besmirch an individual—just like the jews did to Ty Cobb in the movie Cobb! ⚾️
Morris van de Camp starts off this smear of William Pierce by saying the book by his son, Kelvin, ghost-written by our Jewish watch dogs, is enlightening...
Really?
I purchased and reviewed The Sins of My Father at Amazon.com in 2022, but, of course, it never appeared there. So I posted it to the National Alliance’s forum under “fiction,” here: “Sins of My Father” at whitebiocentrism.com.
Will Williams
1.0 of 5 stars Sins of My Father
Verified Purchaser
I Hate My Daddy
The title of Kelvin Pierce’s book is taken from Hebrew biblical references, like the proverb in Jeremiah’s Book: “The fathers have eaten sour grapes, And the children’s teeth are set on edge.” After reading Sins it’s clear that it is Kelvin’s teeth that are set on edge from eating sour grapes, not his father’s.
One question I would ask Kelvin Pierce after reading his rather poorly edited book: Which Jewish watchdog group commissioned this book: Was it the Southern Poverty Law Center or was it the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith? After all, the final sentence in the blurb on the back cover is, “He [William Pierce] was labeled as the most dangerous and influential Neo-Nazi/White Nationalist in North America by the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League, over a 30-year period.” Why would a son quote these haters’ hateful opinions of his father who died 18 years ago?
William Pierce was no Christian. Like most Americans of his generation that were raised Christian he was raised a Presbyterian. Being highly intelligent, a scientist with a doctorate in physics, he “put aside childish things” (like belief in imaginary spooks up in the sky) when he became an adult. Kelvin Pierce apparently is a devout Christian, however (he prays a lot), and is into other eastern creeds from what I gather, reading this “tell all” book about his “evil” father.
Kelvin will never grasp the extraordinary religion his father founded, Cosmotheism, nor the National Alliance, that he says is a “hate group,” parroting the buzz term of “hate” watchdogs. Kelvin is eaten up with irrational guilt, denies his own race, freely admits to near terminal depression, self-doubt, low self-esteem, and has subjected himself to years of therapy to deal with these issues. The only chapters in Sins that seemed to me to be wholly Kelvin’s personal recollections were of the hang gliding hobby he and his father shared, and about his admirable humanitarian work: rebuilding a decrepit orphanage in Georgia, the former Soviet Socialist Republic, years after his dad’s death. The rest of the book, even pre-teen memories from 55 years ago of discipline and corporal punishment for the author’s frequent mischief and for lying to his father seem to this reader to be embellished or edited to fit the “evil hater” profile by an anti-White ghost writer.
Readers who are interested in learning about the founder of Cosmotheism — arguably the greatest man of the second half of the 20th Century — and of his supposedly “most dangerous” National Alliance, or about the SPLC or ADL for that matter, can gain a more balanced, more honest perspective of William Pierce’s life’s work and achievements by searching for those subjects, starting here https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/09/ou … -l-pierce/ rather than by reading this “dump on Daddy” purgation.
Kelvin Pierce is a disturbed individual, manipulated and paid by Jews to write this smear, this unauthorized biography of his dad 18 years after the man had died. I’m glad I got to include this from his authorized biographer, Dr. Robert Griffin, in my recent interview here on C-C:
Dr. Robert Griffin, wrote as follows in [“William Pierce: A Reminiscence” at nationalvanguard.org]
Of course there was his intelligence. Simply, he was the brightest person I’ve ever been around… And there was his character. I found him to be a man of great integrity; there was the tightest fit imaginable between what he most deeply believed and the way he conducted his life. He had enormous commitment and dedication and perseverance. Day after day, year after year, decade after decade, he marched on. And he had courage. He put himself on the line. He went public; he used his own name. And he was incredibly hard working…
Griffin went on to say:
Dr. Pierce could be very shy and reticent… He was very sensitive… And last, he was joyful. Dr. Pierce loved life. He was light and cheerful… I won’t be silent or controlled by fear, not now, not after knowing him. I seek to live with the courage he demonstrated. I want, in my own unique way, to live as he lived, as an honorable white man. Dr. Pierce was an honorable white man.
Morris, after reading your review of Kelvin Pierce’s “enlightening” book, I thought perhaps you got your source material not so much from his book as from the ADL, SPLC and other Jewish sites, like WikiJews. An unknowing high school student, reading Amazon reviews of Kelvin’s book and Googling William Luther Pierce, could have come up with a review similar to yours.
William Pierce was no Christian. Like most Americans of his generation that were raised Christian he was raised a Presbyterian. Being highly intelligent, a scientist with a doctorate in physics, he “put aside childish things” (like belief in imaginary spooks up in the sky) when he became an adult. Kelvin Pierce apparently is a devout Christian, however (he prays a lot), and is into other eastern creeds from what I gather, reading this “tell all” book about his “evil” father.
Kelvin will never grasp the extraordinary religion his father founded, Cosmotheism
As someone who knew Mr. Pierce can you share what his specific beliefs were regarding concepts like synchronicity? And whether he had any thoughts on “twin telepathy”?
Part of why I find the topic interesting is that I’m a (fraternal) twin and Pierce’s sons were twins. I have also had plenty of ‘ESP’ moments with my twin. In my experience, people who don’t want to believe in anything beyond the physical either pull the “well it must have been the 5th time you two had a 1 in a million coincidence” card or accuse twins of lying (and not all twins have it, and it’s often stronger in identicals). My bf is a highly rational guy and he thought some of the things my twin and I could sense about each other was downright fascinating. At this point, my brother and I are basically so used to it that we just consider it normal.
Dani: May 28, 2025 …As someone who knew Mr. Pierce can you share what his specific beliefs were regarding concepts like synchronicity? And whether he had any thoughts on “twin telepathy”?
No. I can’t help you there. Sorry.
—
My bf is a highly rational guy… At this point, my brother and I are basically so used to it that we just consider it normal.
So, Dani, you have a twin brother and a bf (boyfriend?). Kelvin Pierce may be able to help you with your questions if you can track him down. Though from what I’ve heard his brother Eric is a rational guy.
Thank you,
I have a boyfriend and a twin brother (and a younger sister, who has also noticed the odd things my brother & I sometimes sense / pick up on). I honestly don’t know how the twin thing works, just that it happens sometimes.
Kelvin Pierce may be able to help you with your questions if you can track him down. Though from what I’ve heard his brother Eric is a rational guy.
Tbh, I don’t know if I’d trust him to accurately describe his father’s views on anything (even something non-political like twins). I scanned through his book on Kindle and, while it would be truly terrible if he were treated the way he describes, I was left wondering which elements were true and which had been embellished.
The editing is very rough – George Lincoln Rockwell is referred to in one sentence as Rockefeller – and several illogical claims are made.
As an example, one section describes the author’s international adoption in Georgia. Kelvin claims to have overheard a critical and dramatic conversation about the girls he wants to bring home… but why are two Russian speakers using English, when they don’t believe an English speaker is listening, in Tbilisi in the 90s?
There’s also ‘big names’ thrown around that don’t really connect to the story. There’s a section where Hans Ulrich Rudel gets mentioned and I was like, “wait, wasn’t he that WWII pilot that [a friend who is very interested in WWII] mentioned? How is he involved in this? Oh never mind, he’s never brought up again.” It seems like the author was deliberately trying to bring up every prominent post WWII “neo-Nazi” figure.
This situation with WLP’s son is yet one confirmation of the well-known fact that children of great men are always mediocrity; both in terms of intelligence and moral qualities. I can’t remember a single case when a great man would have a bright progeny. I suppose that it is some kind of natural mechanism that prevents a continuous string of exceptional people. Great people always pop-up in the most unexpected places and among the most obscure families.
This poor fellow that happens to be Dr Pierce’s biological child is a mainstream creature like all others around him. He was suggested a good financial deal by some Jewish crooks. Maybe a few tens of thousands. Surely, not more than 100 thousand. How can a mainstream creature soaked with the idea that money is the most important factor in life to lose such an opportunity? It is the usual scheme that is used frequently. Mary Trump and some other distant family members were eager to vilify their relative for money and social advancement. It is normal in a society devoid of moral values. When money becomes a god, everything loses its values, even family ties. This whole story with Dr. Pierce’s son is nothing more than yet one confirmation of the overall decadence of the western society. In a bizarre way it confirms everything that Dr. Pierce warned about.
By the way, this situation is well-known among Russians. In Soviet times it was obligatory to condemn and disavow your close relatives if they happened to be “enemies of the people”. Literally, millions of Russians did it. Wives instantly divorced their husbands, children changed second names, family photos were burned. Nothing had to remind of any connection with the person who was labeled by the system as an enemy. This sad story happened in my family as well. Human beings are generally weak and prefer the easiest way when confronted with harsh choices. Therefore, I don’t want to harshly criticize Dr. Pierce’s son. Certainly, he wasn’t faced with the prospect of being sent to Gulag for refusing to vilify his own father. But, as I said, the herd mentality of the decadent society permeates all its members. By doing this despicable moral crime this man cursed himself. Even according to his own Christian believes he has committed a great sin. Bible says that everyone must honor his parents and never vilify them before strangers. So, in addition to all other failings, Kelvin Pierce is a bad Christian as well.
I may be a red diaper baby, but I’d never dream of trashing my father like this because of an ideological disagreement. Kelvin has earned his 30 pieces of silver.
That would require a longer analysis. I haven’t read this book, but I’ve seen several videos and a documentary about the author. You’re right that a better book on this topic is definitely The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds. I’ve read this book and recommend it to anyone interested in the life of William Luther Pierce.
From the author’s account, Kelvin Pierce, I got the impression that William Luther Pierce devoted all his time and talent to Our Cause. And that he neglected his family at the expense of politics. Kelvin said that he tried to help his father, helped him organize the NA, but was never good enough for his father. And that his father saw him as just a regular activist, that he was quite cold towards him, and that when he got the opportunity to leave the NA and his father, he did so. Kelvin said that white nationalism in general was a very toxic environment in the US at the time, that the NA was a less toxic organization, but even so, people spent most of their time talking about white genocide, armed uprisings, killing non-whites, etc. And that he didn’t want to raise his children in such an environment. Kelvin attended his father’s funeral and talked normally with NA activists there. He didn’t moralize or look down on them. From the videos, I got the impression that he condemns his father for not giving him love, not for his philosophy or life path. Many great philosophical men neglect their families for the sake of their great work. Don Black’s son from the KKK fared much worse than Kelvin.
Ondrej Mann May 27, 2025 … I haven’t read this book, but I’ve seen several videos and a documentary about the author. You’re right that a better book on this topic is definitely The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds. I’ve read this book and recommend it to anyone interested in the life of William Luther Pierce.
—
Those several videos you watched all reinforce Kelvin’s bullshit, Ondrej. You should have noticed that. Kelvin is an extremely disturbed, paid liar.
—
From the author’s account, Kelvin Pierce, …[he] said that he tried to help his father, helped him organize the NA… and that his father saw him as just a regular activist… Kelvin attended his father’s funeral and talked normally with NA activists there…Don Black’s son from the KKK fared much worse than Kelvin.
—
More lies. Kelvin was born in 1960 so would have been 10-years-old when his dad was organizing the National Youth Alliance, and 14 when he was organizing the National Alliance. He did not need young Kelvin’s “regular activist” help with any of that. There was no funeral for Dr. Pierce. I met Kelvin, his wife and two adopted daughters at his dad’s solemn memorial service at NA headquarters a week after his death. Kelvin was treated with respect by the attendees, though it turns out he did not deserve it.
—
…Don Black’s son from the KKK fared much worse than Kelvin.
—
You don’t know what you’re talking about, Ondrej. Did you read Derek Black’s interview with the SPLC or the one with the New York Times for your opinion? His book, Rising Out of Hatred: The Awakening of a Former White Nationalist, like Kelvin’s, can be found on Amazon. Go there and read all ot the 5-star reviews, praising another trashy “telll all” book.
Yes, I read both interviews. Derek Black completely rejected his father, his family, the entire white race, and became transgender. Derek believes that everyone else has had a lot of fun, acceptance, sex, etc. in their lives. And because he was conservative and hated by the majority of society his entire life, he didn’t enjoy anything. Derek was doxxed and then rejected white nationalism. Today, an article was published on CC about how things work in modern schools (most likely) in the US. I talk to young people a lot and I agree with this article. Today, especially in big cities, the sexualization and indoctrination of multicultural schools with white guilt is extreme.
And yes, it is from such schools that deviant Antifa extremists emerge, who set fire to shops, commit violence against white people, and yet have extreme problems with themselves.
In general, it is wrong for white nationalists to drag their children and families into politics. If someone decides to become a white nationalist, an identitarian, they must come to that conclusion on their own and decide for themselves. Today, it is the ideology most hated by the Jewish establishment because it tells the truth about human races, emigration, Jewish influence, and evolutionary strategies. One must be mentally prepared to be unpopular for one’s views, and an innocent child is not.
Attempting to lead highly individualistic, masculine White men has got to be very challenging. I think I’ve heard some pro-White self-segregationists in the Pacific North West remark that (formally) leading a White nationalist movement is as challenging as trying to herd wild cats. But simple self-segregation, is quite natural.
I first discovered Dr. Pierce when researching what exactly occurred in Haiti in 1804. I was very grateful to receive factual, uncensored information. I would suggest that fatigue & exhaustion are way more descriptive of the feelings of racially conscious Whites, than “hate.”
I wonder how much Pierce’s son was paid for that book. To my mind, the best way to “recover” from a less than ideal upbringing is to become the parent you wished you’d had.
The only thing ” enlightening ” about Kelvin’s smear campaign is that it reviles the fact that anyone can get a book published, and as long as they attack and defile some of the best members of our race they will get paid and promoted.
A much more accurate and honest recounting of Dr. Pierce’s life comes from Robert S. Griffin’s Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds. Dr. Griffin lived with Dr. Pierce and each night would talk with Dr. Pierce. You get to see how Dr. Pierce lived and a deeper understanding of what drove him to be the spectacular man he was.
I was born shortly after Dr. Pierce’s unfortunate passing, so I never had the honor to meet him. However he continues to push and inspire me and countless others of our race, to take the necessary actions needed to truly secure our race’s existence. From talking with many people who worked and knew Dr. Pierce they all say that he poured his entire will and being into his work for our people. Most notably with his discovery of the religion that will lead our people to victory, Cosmotheism.
Taken from the forward of Cosmotheism Religion of the Future, “I believe that Dr. William L. Pierce will be known, beyond all his other accomplishments, as the founder of a new religion, Cosmotheism, which I see as the religion of the future–the religion which will, for the culture-bearing stratum of our people at least, supplant all others.”
Let us get away from this foul topic of William Pierce’s disgusting son for a moment for me to compare this young man with him.
—
Dillon Rau: May 28, 2025 The only thing ” enlightening ” about Kelvin’s smear campaign is […] A much more accurate and honest recounting of Dr. Pierce’s life comes from Robert S. Griffin’s Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds. Dr. Griffin lived with Dr. Pierce and each night would talk with Dr. Pierce. You get to see how Dr. Pierce lived and a deeper understanding of what drove him to be the spectacular man he was.
A reminder of what William Pierce’s authorized biographer, Dr. Griffin, wrote in “William Pierce: A Reminiscence” at nationalvanguard.org.:
Of course there was his intelligence. Simply, he was the brightest person I’ve ever been around… And there was his character. I found him to be a man of great integrity; there was the tightest fit imaginable between what he most deeply believed and the way he conducted his life. He had enormous commitment and dedication and perseverance. Day after day, year after year, decade after decade, he marched on. And he had courage. He put himself on the line. He went public; he used his own name. And he was incredibly hard working…
True.
—
Dillon: I was born shortly after Dr. Pierce’s unfortunate passing, so I never had the honor to meet him. However, he continues to push and inspire me and countless others of our race to take the necessary actions needed to truly secure our race’s existence. From talking with many people who worked and knew Dr. Pierce they all say that he poured his entire will and being into his work for our people…
—
That is also true. I was first introduced to Dillon when he was 17 and had ordered books from our online bookstore — the right titles for a young man interested in our cause. As we corresponded and eventually talked, I found he planned to join the Marine Corps. He eventually dropped that plan and joined the National Alliance on his 18th birthday, the first day he had become eligible to apply as an adult. Now, going on three years later, he is one of our most outstanding and productive young members — a part of the future of NA for our race — instead of perhaps being deployed as a combatant in some far-flung military adventure for Israel.
Our members are familiar with Dillon from mention of his selfless activism out in southern California in several issues of our monthly snail-mailed NA Members BULLETIN. Recently he visited our Tennessee community, liked what he saw, and has since decided to return this month to join our National Office staff. What a welcome addition he will be! And what a contrast this exemplary young man is when compared to the psychologically-disturbed loser. Kelvin Pierce. Dr. Pierce would be proud of him.
Dillon is a motivated, natural self starter. One of his many activist-minded acts was to create and update regularly the forum topic “Dr. William L. Pierce Quotes” at whitebiocentrism.com. Just today he posted the following classic wisdom from WLP from 54 years ago, “Why Conservatives Can’t Win”. I like that Dillon goes to the trouble to post with each inspirational Pierce quote where it can be read in context, like this one, found at nationalvanguard.org. Readers need only put the title in the NV search block.
“The advantage has always lain – and will always lie – on the side of the contender who is prepared to take the offensive, rather than maintaining a defensive position only. And the evolutionary natures of the conservative and the revolutionary determine that the one shall always play an essentially defensive role and the other an offensive role.”
Thank you Chairman Williams, I am truly touched by your words.
Something that attracted to me to the Alliance was its uncompromising hard stance on race and what is needed for victory. I was recently reading the article entitled Vow Not to Compromise on NationalVanguard.org . Where Dr. Pierce said ” The Alliance became what it is today by following its own course from its inception…I am not willing to compromise in any significant way the goals or ideology of the National Alliance. ” ( Taken from the January, 2002 National Alliance BULLETIN )
In todays world so many people and groups are willing to compromise. Compromise for attention, money, or short term success. This is a multi-generational struggle and compromise, can not and will not help us achieve the long term survival and expansion of our race. The Alliance and Cosmotheism give our race the ability to combat and defeat our enemies not only today, but gives us the ability to transcend to higher and higher levels of consciousness for eternity.
I thank you, Dr.Pierce, Mr. Strom, and the countless others that continue to inspire myself and the other members of our race to ” Do Right and Fear No One.” – Natall.com
I don’t know if Pierce is “great” or not, time will tell. But famous people who achieve much or blaze a trail (whether you think well or not of these achievements) seem to not always have been “nice” in the way we almost always expect of others. Mr. Rogers they are not. (The only thing I remember about Mr. Rogers is his tuneless singing.)
Take Mozart, Beethoven and Isaac Newton. I’ve never read anything nice about these men, only their horrible personalities. Especially Newton. According to huffpost, the only good thing he had going for him was that he invented calculus. Huffpost created quite a list of his background, attitudes, and activities and much of it makes for sad reading.
I know this was just an example and not your main point but, frankly, I think a White Nationalist Fred Rogers would be one of the greatest, most positive things ever for the movement. You may not remember anything but his singing, but legions of others, I’ve gathered, were profoundly touched by his pleasant manner and kindness. These traits do not preclude race-realism (on the contrary!) or strength. People want to feel protected on all fronts and nurtured by their own.
Ultimately, WNs have to recognize that one of the reasons no one wants what we’re hocking is because the messenger is so often a dick that nobody in his or her right mind would want for a neighbor.
I recently learned, of all things, that Mr. Rogers sued Ice Cube over using his “neighborhood” jingle at the start of a rap song. In addition, it looks like he’s sued the KKK of Missouri.
You’d think such an iconic “neighbor” would be able to work out verbal agreements, without having to lawyer up, & square off.
https://genius.com/a/the-time-mister-rogers-sued-ice-cube-over-a-gangsta-s-fairytale
https://allthatsinteresting.com/mr-rogers-sues-the-kkk
These traits [pleasant manner and kindness] do not preclude race-realism (on the contrary!) or strength.
Theoretically, you’re right about that and thank you for replying. What you say, above, doesn’t appear to reflect reality.
When you hold grossly unpopular, even illegal, opinions, living as you do in a hostile society, then it is nearly impossible to be “nice”, i.e., agreeable at all times no matter what. To hold White identitarian or nationalist views is viewed by almost the whole damn population as inherently not-nice and they won’t make an exception for you if you are helpful, generous and kind. Even if you save their children from drowning. They need to hate, and you’re it – not people who throw little children off a 3-storey balcony or shoot them point blank in the head for accidentally riding their tricycle on your lawn. Or gang rape for many hours straight then stuff you into a garbage can to choke to death with bleach in your mouth.
One of the most memorable episodes he did was in 1969, when Mr. Rogers and his guest star Officer Clemmons, played by Black actor François Clemmons, soaked their feet together in a kiddie pool.
There’s much more and I hope everyone will read the long article, link compliments of Kim.
Some of you really need to start putting more effort into understanding what is meant, and not meant, by comments (like the one I left, above).
Seriously, do you honestly think I mean to suggest that Fred Rogers’ egalitarian beliefs, rather than his manners and empathy, are the good example that White Nationalists should follow?
The very idea that any of those incidents you’ve mentioned are either news to me or something to which I’d advocate responding with anything besides brutality is presumptious and unreasonable.
Seriously, do you honestly think I mean to suggest that Fred Rogers’ egalitarian beliefs, rather than his manners and empathy, are the good example that White Nationalists should follow?
Yes, of course I understood what you meant. My point, and I did have one, was that Mr. Rogers was known for being ultra-nice and not much else, which is why I mentioned him in the first place. WNs have to walk on the edge of a sword when others don’t have to do so.
She [Mr. Rogers’ widow] was keener on imparting to the writers just how funny Fred was. If the couple was out at an event that turned out to be bland, he had a go-to way of making her laugh: passing gas.
“He would just raise one cheek and he would look at me and smile,” she said, cracking herself up.
Principled & racially loyal > Nice & polite
WNs have to recognize that one of the reasons no one wants what we’re hocking is because the messenger is so often a dick that nobody in his or her right mind would want for a neighbor.
Couldn’t agree more. If I could indulge in some amateur psychoanalysis, I think there’s a lot of the whole “chicken and the egg” thing going on there. What I mean by that is that ideologies/belief systems that the powers that be have spent decades demonizing and witch-hunting into the far outer reaches of respectability are generally (although certainly not always) going to appeal to a certain type–naturally contrarian, aggressively non-conformist personalities that tend to not play nice with others. People who make an effort to be kind-hearted and altruistic are going to shy away from world views that they have been gaslit from birth to believe are only held by the morally depraved. Obviously, that trend is changing, and it seems to be changing pretty steadily. I guess reality can be awfully persuasive when you get down to it.
I think you’re right on the mark with that. It’s interesting, because some people, like you’ve described, equate “nice” with being merely pleasant. Others (like myself) believe that a key feature of being nice is to also be just and protective; that is, if you are merely pleasant but shirk your responsibility to protect your own when a threat appears, you have necessarily become cruel, not nice, no matter how pleasant your manners.
Niceness isn’t inherently weak, it’s lichen on a stone.
Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick,
I beg to disagree.
Over the course of half a century, I would reckon that I’ve heard, “Be nice, smile, and if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all,” more often than you.
Nice simply means polite. When chatting among women, nice doesn’t imply responsible.
“Others (like myself) believe that a key feature of being nice is to also be just and protective”
The above character traits you mention are those of a person of high character, and a true gentleman.
Young girls, especially, are trained “to be nice to everybody” (even when brazen rudeness does not warrant such kindness in return.) Kindness to all is weakness. A few years ago, I was shocked to discover that there were no local Catholics willing to stand up for an (outstanding) church-going Catholic father’s right to see his own children when his adulterous wife decided to divorce him, & fight for total custody of their kids.
The reason for this? All the Catholic friends of this couple wanted to “be nice” and remain neutral, while an innocent man and absolute pillar of the community was in serious danger of losing his children. For women, it’s very difficult for us to be perceived as principled *and* “nice” so I prioritize principled.
I’ve frequently been tapped to politely deliver difficult news on several occasions. I was even hugged by a hospital employee I was asked to fire. He told me, “That was the nicest firing I’ve ever received.”
My local city is papered with signs barking the command to “BE KIND.” Ironically, it leaves off “please” and “thank you.”
Stronza: May 28, 2025 I don’t know if Pierce is “great” or not, time will tell... According to huffpost... Huffpost created quite a list of [Isaac Newton’s] background, attitudes, and activities and much of it makes for sad reading.
Time has already told those of us in certain circles that count that Pierce was a great man. The rest can learn about him from Jewish “hate expert” accounts, or Kelvin Pierce’s sad, ghost-written smear, or from the Huffington Post.
Stronza, you’d do better to spend a few hours at this piece from Greg Johnson 12 years ag9: “Remembering William Luther Pierce: September 11, 1933–July 23, 2002” at counter-currents.com. Greg put together around three dozen articles by and about Pierce that are only marred by a few comments under a couple of them by a Covingtonista, claiming that Harold Covington’s Northwest Republic is “the answer.”
Under a 2012 essay, “The Turner Diaries & Hunter” by Andrew Hamilton, I found a comment by Ulf Larsen July 24, 2012 Why doesn’t the National Alliance publish “The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard Tabloid” again? It has been out of print for quite some time now.
Andrew Hamilton reaponded: ...[T]he Best of Attack! and National Vanguard Tabloid has a unique, oversized format designed to convey the look and feel of the original tabloid, which it does very successfully. It contains many illustrations from the original articles. It is no doubt difficult and costly to reproduce. The American racialist right, indeed the American hard right, has always been starved for money. Those in power understand that money is oxygen to any movement, so they make certain there is none.
Greg Johnson added: I don’t think it is possible, simply because the rights belong to the National Alliance.
They were both right, When I became NA Chairman two and one half years after these gentlemen wrote these words here at C-C, after National Vanguard Books had become defunct, and NA had nearly flatlined, I was determined to reprint The Best of Attack and National Vanguard and other out of print or nearly out of print NVB titles, if I had to do so with my own money — which, essentially I did. I just now ordered the third reprinting of BANV and it is now available at our online bookstore, here: “The Best of Attack and National Vanguard compiled by Kevin Alfred Strom – Cosmotheism” at cosmotheistchurch.org.
BANV is listed there now at $70, but we must raise its price to $75 because of the increased cost of printing and p&h.
I’ve never read any substantial articles about Pierce. I’ve seen a few comments about him here and there over the years and that was the extent of my knowledge.
Re nationalvanguard site. Ages ago, I somehow stumbled on an article there (my first time at your site) which explained something I could never understand, namely, how it was that we fought the Germans (i.e., supported the Soviet Union) and then, lo & behold, after the war it got turned around 180 degrees to where we & USSR became major enemies. I was so grateful for that info (exposing of neoconservatism) and I still don’t remember how I found that article but it did fill in so many gaps. I seem unable to find it now. Thanks so much for your information.
As to Kelvin’s book, he is not the first to publicly condemn a parent and make a few bucks doing it. Maybe it all started with Joan Crawford’s daughter? I don’t agree with this approach to dealing with anger stemming from (purported) deficient child rearing. There has to be a better way other than making a fool of yourself.
Stronza: May 29, 2025 I’ve never read any substantial articles about Pierce. I’ve seen a few comments about him here and there over the years and that was the extent of my knowledge.
Re nationalvanguard site. Ages ago, I somehow stumbled on an article there (my first time at your site) which explained something I could never understand, namely, how it was that we fought the Germans (i.e., supported the Soviet Union) and then, lo & behold, after the war it got turned around 180 degrees to where we & USSR became major enemies. I was so grateful for that info (exposing of neoconservatism) and I still don’t remember how I found that article but it did fill in so many gaps. I seem unable to find it now. Thanks so much for your information.
—
You don’t provide enough information for me to locate that article. Pierce is not the only person featured at National Vanguard or on C-C who can straighten out your thinking on American participation in world wars against Germany then against the Soviets in the Cold War after that — but you must read! I recommend Dr. Thomas Dalton’s thoroughly-researched, two part “The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 1” at nationalvanguard.org Dalton provides notes so the reader can validate what he writes.
Earlier you wrote:
—
Stronza: May 28, 2025 …When you hold grossly unpopular, even illegal, opinions, living as you do in a hostile society, then it is nearly impossible to be “nice”…
—
Truth is truth, Stronza. Being “nice” or “grossly unpopular” when telling the truth has little to do with it. It is not illegal to tell the truth about Jews — not yet, except in certain countries where the truth-teller can be jailed for questioning details about the Jews’ Holocaust tale.
Well, what about the people protesting the total destruction of Gaza? Look what has happened to them. It is now forbidden to protest Gaza because that = antisemitism.
I bought all the titles and thought they were great! I especially like the best of Attack! !
what ever happened to Andrew Hamilton? I always thought he was brilliant.
Take negative things you read about Newton with a grain of salt. There is a huge revisionist movement to smear Newton as a bad person and lessen his scientific stature. It’s a very popular field of inquiry, to make Newton seem strange and evil! Newton is seen as the presiding white European genius who represents the old classical European regime. Einstein is the great genius of the new world order who also has compassion however. Newton is relentlessly slandered while einstein’s character is sainted. There was a bio of Einstein some years back that painted a bit of a negative picture of him. He sort of traded in his first wife for a richer replacement as soon as he got famous. He put his schizophrenic son in an institution and never visited him. He was probably an amoral sperg same as Newton. The bio was bashed in reviews and immediately a hagiographic bio was published of Einstein the next year. There is a Star Trek episode in which data conjures Einstein and Newton in the holodeck and data and Einstein don’t get along with Newton, who is uncool. you see, Newton represents cruel old Europe while Einstein is the secular saint of the new world order! You have to keep in mind, it’s an ethnocentric fight.
I have similarly observed a work in progress of replacing every great figure of classical European intellectual history with a “new age hero.” Every intellectual hero or heart warming story is substituted for. For example, Lenard Euler the great Swiss mathematician whom e is named for, had the record for the highest number of math publications in history. Recently it was replaced by Paul Erdos. There are numerous examples. All these new age heroes have something in common….
Take negative things you read about Newton with a grain of salt. There is a huge revisionist movement to smear Newton as a bad person and lessen his scientific stature
Thanks. All this white man bashing is so common that I decided to not take it too seriously. I know that there is a grain of truth in some of these unfavorable depictions but the parties pushing this could just as soon have paid these geniuses some compliments, too. Nasty gossip is always more interesting, though, especially when it’s dead white men.
Here’s a debate on Erdos VS Euler and it makes for interesting reading. I’d say Euler comes out ahead.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39173971
Thanks. It’s not a need for dirty gossip, so to speak. Newton is furiously slandered, while you’re not allowed to say anything bad about Einstein. It’s like a microcosm of the white guilt thing. One example I can recall off the top of my head is in Stephen Hawking’s brief history of time, he has little blurb biographies of some of the scientists. He remarks that Newton used his metallurgical genius later in his life to find out forgers in his job as minister of the mint, sending many men to the gallows. Well, that may be true, but hanging was a common penalty even for petty theft back then. For example, the poet Tennyson recalls that he saw men hanging in the gallows for thievery when he was a boy as late as the early 1800s. why was it important for Hawking to say this in his short paragraph bio? He knew he would impress so-and-so by slandering Newton somehow.
Euler is definitely the greatest, there is no question. Euler, Cauchy and Gauss are the giant trio you can’t bypass, period. Erdos is a nobody who published a lot, but no one knows what exactly. 🙂 I am a specialist and never came across his papers.
Anyway, the number of publications or Hirsch index are poor metrics. For example, Galois didn’t publish a lot (for obvious reasons), but he’s a genius. Lobachevskiy and Lyapunov, Poincaré and Fourier are geniuses, because they established new mathematical fields. Obviously, there are people who published more, so what? Now we have an avalanche of papers and no people like these four. Hmmm… We need to publish MORE!
Those who try to spoil Newton’s reputation are just petty idiots. While he’s unlikely to be a saint, those attacks don’t add up. Eventually he would be blamed for not supporting BLM, I guess. 😉 With Einstein, it’s more complicated. To sort it out, you need to read the original papers, letters, diaries – I don’t have time for that. But my fraud detectors flash red on Einstein. Some of “his” achievements are either exaggerated or misattributed. For example, Poincaré and Lorentz deserve more credit for STR. He never got a Nobel Prize for relativity. His overall image is astroturfed. One example: I know there is a museum in Princeton associated with him. But V.K. Zvorykin also worked there on TV technology. Americans are “materially-oriented”, but they worship Einstein and not Zvorykin. Very strange… 😉
Overall, there is a tendency in the media to push certain people, and it’s not merit-based. It encompasses Einstein, Erdos, Von Neumann (although he has more merit), Hawking, Oppenheimer, Sakharov, to name some. Of course, people like Millikan, Shockley, Lenard, Stark, Heisenberg get the opposite treatment. While it’s petty and pathetic, we shouldn’t ignore those doing it.
Wow, do you have a PhD in mathematics? That’s awesome! I take that back. You may be smarter than Pierce! Yes, basically I agree with everything you said. I’m very suspicious of the Einstein myth now myself increasingly all the time. I would love to have a prolonged discussion about it. however, my point here is not revisionism, but just to say that figures of a certain ilk are blown up or eulogized and praised, while European figures are slandered and attacked. something interesting that I’ve noticed, have you ever heard of Steinmetz, the famous Jewish electrical engineer? Well, before Einstein, they were trying to do the same thing with Steinmetz, to make him a great presiding genius. For example, if you read literature from about 1900 to 1920, I’ve noticed it was common to call someone Steinmetz, to indicate like an unusual brainy person, sort of like Einstein is used today. And also, there are all these little stories about how noble and wonderful he was, for example lol, there was the story that in the frigid New York winter one time there was a family of mice nesting in his radiator, and he didn’t turn on the radiator all winter because he did not want to disturb their family. Awwwwe! But at some point, they changed horses to Einstein as the better candidate for the Jewish supergenius.
And the current scientists are anything but moral or emphatic. They weren’t in 1900, either, but quality has significantly declined from that time until now.
For example, Boris Berezovsky. He was a member of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (control theory), but, after USSR collapsed, became an oligarch and a criminal figure. There’s a pretty good book on him by Pavel Khlebnikov (“Kremlin’s Godfather Boris Berezovsky and the Story of the Sacking of Russia”). It’s difficult to imagine how awful Berezovsky was. (By the way, he was initially behind Putin’s election, with Gusinsky and other trash.)
Or take Sakharov. He is known for his “dissidency” and received a Nobel Prize for it (Shafarevich did more, but was sidelined, although they were in one group for some time). His “dissident platform” actually has “the right to emigrate” as the most important. So good, we see his target audience. 🙂 He was also “anti-nuclear”, of course. But I know an anecdote about him: when it became possible to make as large a hydrogen bomb as you want, he rushed to the Soviet generals and proposed to make a “nuclear submarine” (i.e. fill it with nuclear explosives to the full). It ought to be blown up near America’s coast, and it could be technically 1 gigaton, or 10 gigaton, or even more. Such an explosion can obliterate the whole East Coast, for example. The Soviet generals (!) declined, replying that they “are not monsters”. 🙂 So much for “peace”.
Tsiolkovsky can be counted as even worse. Although he isn’t an actual scientist, he was heavily promoted by the Soviets as a “space pioneer” (that’s not true). He advocated sadistic elimination of all non-sensient life forms anywhere in the universe. (Don’t ask me why.)
So, we have a criminal, murderer and thief, a potential killer on a planetary scale and an advocate of mass slaughter on a universal scale. Impressive. Very nice.
I won’t even touch the present situation. Scientists are ready to cut each other’s throats for grants.
Eventually, there are both good and awful people in that milieu. I can’t say scientists are better on average than others. Likely they are worse, in fact. Idealising them is like thinking TV celebrities are “moral”.
I don’t have that much experience with academians , but I do think people in academia for the most part are really good and noble people compared to what’s out there. Much better than lawyers or doctors.
Thank you for your kind words! Actually, I’m far from Dr. Pierce, and even farther from my ideals like Mendeleev, Lomonosov, Shafarevich. I’ve graduated and published several papers, but haven’t my PhD ready yet. You gave me an additional motivation to prepare it sooner!
And thanks for the Steinmetz reference. No, I have never heard of him before at all. Apparently, he’s too great!
Stronza: May 30, 2025 Well, what about the people protesting the total destruction of Gaza? Look what has happened to them. It is now forbidden to protest Gaza because that = antisemitism.
—
Who cares? that Semite vs. Semite conflict in the faraway Middle-East is none of our business. While we’re on the subject of truth, I put up a comment under John Massaro’s brilliant article a week or two ago that says exactly how I feel about those protesters: “The Vietnam War Protests and the Israeli Genocide Protests” at nationalvanguard.org
These empty-headed campus protesters give our Jewish masters cover. What Americans, especially Jew-wise Whites, should be in the streets, protesting and rioting about, is not Israel’s genocide of their fellow Semites in Gaza (not our problem) but Jewish supremacism here in America, specifically Jew control of Americans’ mass mind through their stranglehold on their news and entertainment industry that William Pierce focused on for decades: “Who Rules America 2010” at nationalvanguard.org. Our Jew media masters’ names may have changed and need to be updated, but they still control the mass mind.
Who cares? that Semite vs. Semite conflict in the faraway Middle-East is none of our business.
It looks to me as if the bunch in Washington has made it our business. Without that financial input, there’d be no major conflict there at all which should concern us.
@Stronza,
Next time you start to feel any compassion for the Palestinians or any other Muslims just take a gander at what the Turks did to “beautiful” Greek boys and girls after the Fall of Constantinople. If that doesn’t fill you with rage there are literally millions of other examples of what Muslims and similar trash have done and are STILL doing to Our People.
I am not losing sleep over Gaza – just noticing, that’s all.
Since Moslems are not our friends, should we then urge the Prez to make a full-bore attack on Iran?
As one who knew William Pierce well, I find his son’s claim of repeated savage beatings impossible to believe. Nor can I believe that his wife would have tolerated that.
Kelvin and his handlers must have known there’d be no book without that lie. And the joke’s on them, there’s no book anyway (if a book be more than a packet of stale lies).
It seems to me that Kelvin is extremely jealous of his father’s intellect, charisma and fortitude. What kind of son speaks this way about his own father who is no longer around to defend himself against such obvious jew inspired slander? I’m surprised the shylock who wrote this Wieselesque farce didn’t conjure up tales of Dr. Pierce wearing a dress and eating puppies as well.
This genre of “former neo-nazi learns the error of his ways and becomes a rabbi’s personal toilet attendant” is getting old.
Thanks to William L. Pierce I discovered the Rhodesian Bush War (in an article published in Attack! in 1976, if I remember correctly) and the massacre of white farmers in Zimbabwe (American Dissident Voices podcasts from 2000’s). The disastrous outcome of this war made me aware of the suicidal morality that has guided white people since the wars of decolonization (see also Dominique Venner’s “ Le Cœur rebelle” (1994) on that subject), and against which we are fighting. Despite his faults, one can only salute his personal courage, his perseverance and, above all, what is most important in my eyes, his intellectual integrity. This kind of man is extremely rare, and it is essential to preserve his memory for present and future generations. I agree with the article’s conclusion: it’s impossible to do everything throughout a single human life.
Sir, you are of the 1 or 2 percent that were truth-seekeers who listened to and still remember Pierce’s wisdom 24 years ago when he warned us what was coming for our race, using Rhodesia as the example.
Let’s not be shy in calling the 98% who would not or could not listen to his warning, lemmings — They could not believe him in 2001, much less in 1976, because they heard the opposite of his warning through their electronic Jew screens, as did their neighbors, associates, and nearly everyone else in their social circles who got their news and ideas from Jew-controlled media: LEMMINGS!**
Pardon the wall of text from Pierce, but this is what he was telling us:
**lemming – noun, (lemɪŋ), 1. A lemming is an animal that looks like a large rat with thick fur. Lemmings live in cold northern regions and sometimes travel in very large numbers. 2. countable noun [usually plural]If you say that a large group of people are acting like lemmings, you are critical of them because they all follow each other into an action without thinking about it.
—
Le Fauconnier: July 4, 2025 Thanks to William L. Pierce I discovered the Rhodesian Bush War (in an article published in Attack! in 1976, if I remember correctly) and the massacre of white farmers in Zimbabwe (American Dissident Voices podcasts from 2000’s). The disastrous outcome of this war made me aware of the suicidal morality that has guided white people since the wars of decolonization…
—
HAVE YOU BEEN paying attention to what’s happening in Rhodesia and South Africa in recent weeks? Certainly not, if your only sources of news are the controlled news media, such as CNN or the network television news programs. They’ve been far too busy giving you interviews with Chandra Levy’s parents.
Of course, I have reported to you from time to time on the situations in Rhodesia, now officially known as “Zimbabwe,” and in South Africa. It is depressing to me to talk about these things. It is depressing to me to see the predictions that I made long ago coming true. And it has been even more depressing than usual recently as the deterioration of conditions in those countries has accelerated, as the ultimate horror that I predicted has become visible.
Two weeks ago, we talked about the growing phenomenon of the gang rape of White women by Blacks in South Africa. It has been a little over a year, however, since we talked about the seizure and looting of White farms in Rhodesia and the killing of White farm families there by mobs of Blacks. President for Life Robert Mugabe wanted to enhance his popularity among his followers by taking land away from White farmers and giving it to Blacks. When he began this activity Mugabe had to use a certain degree of caution for two reasons. First, virtually all the agricultural product of Rhodesia came from the White farms; Blacks engaged only in subsistence farming, and White farms that were turned over to Blacks essentially went out of production, weakening the country’s economy. Second, a substantial portion of White Rhodesians were British citizens, and the British government was protesting the dispossession and mistreatment of its citizens.
It soon became clear to Mugabe, however, that the British government of Prime Minister Tony Blair really didn’t care what happened to Rhodesia’s Whites and that the government’s protests were merely empty words. Furthermore, as the Rhodesian economy, badly damaged by the earlier seizures of White farms, sank further toward chaos, jobless Blacks clamored for even more White land. A government of reasonable men might have salvaged the Rhodesian economy by a combination of austerity measures and strict law enforcement, but that is not the African way. The African way — more generally, the Black way is to kill the goose and get all the golden eggs now. So Mugabe, in order to maintain his popularity, has continued to let the mobs of jobless Blacks seize White farms and despoil them.
The process is now spiraling out of control. Last week a group of White farmers fought their way through a mob of squatters who were attacking a White farm. They rescued the besieged White farmer, but they injured a number of the Black squatters while doing it. The Mugabe government in turn arrested 23 of the White farmers who had been involved in the rescue, denied them bond, and threw them into prison in chains, where they now are at the tender mercies of Black jailers.
It is mid-winter in Rhodesia, and the unheated prison cells where the White farmers are being held are freezing. When three jailers in the prison responded to a request from the Whites for blankets, Mugabe promptly had the jailers themselves arrested. The Whites are not to be “coddled,” he announced, sending a clear message to the other jailers and to policemen that Whites could be abused with impunity. Mugabe has, in effect, declared all White Rhodesians to be outlaws. Blacks may attack them and steal their property, and they may not attempt to protect themselves. In order to make things perfectly clear, last Saturday Mugabe’s second-in-command, Vice President Joseph Msika, announced: “Whites are not human beings.” In the past year only nine White farmers have been murdered by Blacks during the seizures of White farms, but the death toll is now certain to increase rapidly.
Also last Saturday, Mugabe steeply increased his goal for the dispossession of Whites when he revealed a new plan calling for 95 per cent of all White farmland in Rhodesia to be turned over to Blacks. That, on top of the imprisonment of the 23 White farmers, caused a mass exodus of White families from farms in the area of northern Rhodesia where mobs of Black squatters have been most active recently. Three hundred women and children were evacuated from 130 White farms over the weekend, and more than 60 of those farms already have been invaded and ransacked by squatters, who routinely slaughter all pet cats and dogs left behind, carry off everything of value, even ripping out bathtubs and other plumbing fixtures, and destroy the rest. White evacuees in the town of Chinhoyi were attacked on the streets by Blacks, and White women who attempted to take food and warm clothing to their imprisoned husbands were beaten outside the prison.
And the controlled media here are silent. The politicians are silent. The Christian ministers, who used to preach crusades against Rhodesia when it was a White country, are silent. The various bleeding-heart types, who are terribly distressed over what AIDS is doing to the Black population of Africa and always are running around organizing international conferences and lobbying the government to provide more medical assistance to AIDS-stricken Blacks, are silent.
The media bosses are silent because they are happy with the present situation. This is the way they planned it. The politicians and most of the rest are silent because they really don’t care. Those who are a little uncomfortable about the stepped-up genocide being waged against Whites in Rhodesia are afraid to say anything lest they be accused of “White racism.” Everyone with any sense at all of Political Correctness understands that any expression of concern or sympathy for White people engaged in a conflict with Blacks is racist. The details are irrelevant: in any racial conflict, one must support the non-White side in order to be Politically Correct. It doesn’t matter what the Blacks are doing to the Whites: if you complain about it, you will be accused of racism.
I’ve seen this happen many times. My organization, the National Alliance, distributes leaflets and stickers with the message, “Earth’s most endangered species: the White race help preserve it,” and then our address. That’s all: no mention of Blacks, Jews, racial conflict, or anything else, just a call for concern about preserving our own kind. And yet every time we distribute this message, the news media begin shrieking hysterically about “racism” and “hate”: every time. Some of our “Earth’s most endangered species” stickers show up in a school or on a university campus or posted on traffic signs in a community, and the local media people begin shrieking about “hate propaganda” and urge local citizens to call the police if they see one of our stickers.
The big Jewish media bosses have everyone who works for the media, Gentile as well as Jew, so thoroughly conditioned, so thoroughly indoctrinated with anti-White propaganda, that any expression of concern for White people is denounced immediately as “hate” and “racism.” I’ll guarantee you, if the White Rhodesians were mopping up the Blacks over there, running the last of them out of the country and reclaiming their farms, there would be non-stop anti-Rhodesian coverage on every television news program in America and in Britain. There would be calls from the politicians in the Congress for our government to send in the U.S. Army to save the Blacks and punish the wicked White Rhodesians. A strict embargo on all trade with Rhodesia already would have been imposed. That idiot we have in the White House wouldn’t have to study the matter the way he did before issuing a statement on stem cell research; the Jews would have him on television immediately denouncing the Rhodesians and threatening grim reprisals. And his British counterpart, Tony Blair, would be shaking his fist and foaming at the mouth as he raved against the evils of “White racism.”
And do you know what the British and U.S. governments have done to discourage Mugabe in his current war against the White population of Rhodesia? The Brits are threatening not to let their cricket team play in Rhodesia when it goes on tour next year. Last week the U.S. Senate passed something called the “Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act.” It couples additional monetary handouts from the U.S. Treasury for various programs in Rhodesia to visa restrictions on those charged with violent repression of civil rights. Visa restrictions! That’s what’s supposed to make Mugabe behave himself!
Of course, there’s no hint in the “Zimbabwe Democracy and Recovery Act” of the genocide being waged against White Rhodesians. Really, the whole idea of the thing is to provide money for the so-called “democratic opposition” to Mugabe’s dictatorship: money to finance Black democrats, not to save White Rhodesians. Even so, the whole business is being handled very quietly, lest the media make a fuss about it and claim that it’s a “racist” act because by helping Mugabe’s opponents it may help the White farmers. But really, there’s no danger of the media making a fuss about it because the last thing the Jewish media bosses want to do is alert the White lemmings here about what’s going on in Rhodesia.
Well, as I said earlier, I don’t like to talk about what’s going on in Rhodesia and in South Africa, and believe me, what’s happening in Rhodesia now will be happening in South Africa soon. It depresses me to talk about this. I talk about it because it is a powerful lesson for us. It was only a few years ago that both of these countries were White countries. They were good, decent places for our people to live. I knew South Africans and Rhodesians. They were better people, on the average, than White Americans: better looking, healthier, better racially, better genetically. They had a small problem with Black terrorists, but it was a small problem. Fewer Rhodesians and South Africans were killed each year by Black terrorists than were killed in traffic accidents. Many, many more died each year from smoking cigarettes than from fighting a bush war against Black communists such as Robert Mugabe. And yet both countries now are under Black rule and are sinking rapidly into savagery and chaos.
How did it happen? The short answer is that it happened because both countries were persuaded to commit collective race suicide….
To learn more about how it happened, see here from Dr. Pierce 24 years ago: “WLP91: To Be, or To Be Nice” at nationalvanguard.org
DarkPlato: May 29, 2025 … Actually Kevin macdonald might be smarter than pierce, I just have physics envy
—
What an odd statement, DP. You have two brilliant, courageous White academicians who were not afraid to tackle the JQ honestly — one, Kevin MacDonald, from his position as an tenured evolutionary psychologist, the other, William Pierce, a tenured professor of physics and bona fide rocket scientist. Both men were attacked constantly by the Jewish ADL and SPLC hate groups, but both persevered. To compare the “smarts” of these two is like comparing a delicious juicy apple to a delicious juicy orange. What’s the point?
Pierce set his own unique path, I’d say, founding a movement and membership organization to organize our people for its preservation, the National Alliance, and a spiritual foundation for that movement, a religion for our people, Cosmotheism, that will be his lasting legacy.
MacDonald has written books, essays, and maintained a print quarterly journal and a wonderful Website. Pierce did the same, but would never have associated his Alliance with the big tent alt-right or the American Freedom Party as MacDonald has done. Also. unlike MacDonald, Pierce gave up his successful academic carreer entirely to dedicate the rest of his life to to work fulltime, telling the most difficult truths to save his race.
I’m not aware of an authorized biographer of Dr. MacDonald, but Pierce’s, Dr. Robert Griffin, wrote Pierce’s biography, Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, as well as “William Pierce: A Reminiscence” at nationalvanguard.org, after his death that gives an altogrther different first hand view of the man than did the smear of him by son, the paid Jewish tool, Kelvin:
Of course, there was his intelligence. Simply, he was the brightest person I’ve ever been round. I found it stunning the way he could sift through details, distractions, and surface realities and get to the essence of a concern… And there was his character. I found him to be a man of great integrity; there was the tightest fit imaginable between what he most deeply believed and the way he conducted his life. He had enormous commitment and dedication and perseverance. Day after day, year after year, decade after decade, he marched on. And he had courage. He put himself on the line. He went public; he used his own name. And he was incredibly hard working: twelve and fourteen hour days, seven days a week…
I spent hours upon hours with Dr. Pierce, often at the end of a long day when he was winding down. I never heard him denigrate an Alliance member or someone who worked with him. He didn’t gossip. He respected people. He was, and this has become as big a compliment as I can make about someone, a sincere man… I am coming to realize the great impact Dr. Pierce has made on my own life. So much more than before I knew him, I am aware of my own finiteness and the need to do what is truly important and lasting in whatever time I have left. So much more than before, I am committed to live publicly and fully as the person I really am. I won’t be silent or controlled by fear, not now, not after knowing him. I seek to live with the courage he demonstrated. I want, in my own unique way, to live as he lived, as an honorable White man. Dr. Pierce was an honorable White man.
I’m unaware if Greg Johnson ever provided a personal evaluation of Kevin MacDonald, but he had this to say about William Pierce ten years after he’d died, reminiscing about their meeting in 2001:
I found that Pierce had a deep feel for philosophical and spiritual questions and a first rate speculative mind…During our conversation on July 14, 2001, Pierce told us something that I will always remember. He loved physics, and he said that giving up academia was the hardest thing he ever did, but in the end, nothing could compare with the freedom to spend the rest of his life speaking the truth.
DP, since you say you have physics envy, imagine giving up your love of physics as Pierce did to dedicate your life to the daunting, seemingly thankless, life of trying to save the White race. Also, imagine giving up, much less ever loving this, Pierce’s doctoral thesis:
“ELECTRONICALLY INDUCED NUCLEAR QUADRUPOLE SPIN TRANSITIONS IN A GaAs SINGLE CRYSTAL”
The image of the impressive, full-page mathematical formula that accompanies Pierce’s thesis cannot be posted here on C-C but is available to view here at whitebiocentrism.com as “Albert Einstein, Shameless Plagiarist”.
If I had to list three books which epitomize our movement I’d say The Camp Of The Saints, The Turner Diaries, and The Culture Of Critique. Interestingly, in Fame Of A Dead Man’s Deeds Griffin provides a detailed analysis of MacDonald’s book in the context of Pierce’s reading.
Douglas Mercer: July 9, 2025 If I had to list three books which epitomize our movement I’d say The Camp Of The Saints, The Turner Diaries, and The Culture Of Critique. Interestingly, in Fame Of A Dead Man’s Deeds Griffin provides a detailed analysis of MacDonald’s book in the context of Pierce’s reading.
—
I’m not sure which chapter of Fame has Griffin’s analysis of KMac, but all chapters of Fame are easily accessed on nationalvanguard.org, as are all 26 chapters of Pierce’s 1970s non-fiction classic, Who We Are.
Our people seriously need serious non-fiction books. KMac’s are available on Amazon. I just talked to David Duke — going strong after 60 years of political activism. His Jewish Supremacism, though a little heavy on Biblical history for my tastes, still, is an eye-opener for those new to the JQ. Available, here: Jewish Supremacism – David Duke.com
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.