Counter-Currents
Irreconcilable Differences: The Case for Racial Divorce
Greg Johnson
1,455 words
Translations: Finnish, French, Spanish
To listen in a player, click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link as” or “save target as.”
Black America and White America need to go our separate ways. We need a racial divorce.
Political separation along ethnic lines does not happen every day, and it usually involves hatred, violence, and bloodshed. So most whites simply do not wish to contemplate it. But all-too-many whites are quite willing contemplate a smaller-scale form of separation, namely divorce. And indeed, the model we recommend for peaceful and humane racial separation is the so-called “velvet divorce” between the Czechs and the Slovaks.
If the relationship between whites and blacks in America today were a marriage, we would have divorced long ago. The same is true of whites and Jews, and any other non-white group. White Nationalists are simply proposing a policy of racial divorce.
Legally, there are two kinds of divorce: fault and no-fault. In a fault divorce, at least one party is held responsible for the breakdown of the marriage. Causes include:
- spousal abuse
- substance abuse
- incarceration
- adultery
- infecting one’s spouse with a sexually-transmitted disease
- insanity
- abandonment
In no-fault divorces, neither party is held to be singly responsible. The main causes are separation and irreconcilable differences. Irreconcilable differences include:
- Strong personality differences
- Strong lifestyle differences
- Strong differences between work and spending patterns
- Lack of trust
- Lack of reciprocity
- Constant bickering
- Long-simmering resentment
- Contempt
- Inability of the relationship to meet the emotional needs of one or both partners
It is interesting that even something as seemingly trivial as different work and spending habits can be a cause for divorce. But earning and spending are a large part of life, and mismatches there can easily spill over into and upset the rest of one’s life.
In the case of blacks and whites in America, there is plenty of fault on both sides. But focusing on historical grievances is actually a trap, simply because groups may be victims, but they are not perpetrators. Collective guilt is meaningless. And many individual whites and blacks today have not harmed or been harmed by one another, so collective historical grievances are not sufficient cause for many to contemplate racial divorce.
For instance, I think it was a terrible crime to introduce black slaves to the New World. But I do not feel a shred of guilt for it. And although my life has been negatively impacted by the presence of blacks in America, most black individuals have done me no harm, and some have actually benefited me. Thus my desire for racial divorce has nothing to do with guilt or innocence or moral judgments of any kind.
Racial divorce is not really about individuals at all. It is about the incompatibility of groups. There are above average blacks who are credits to white society, and there are below average whites who drag our race down. But the character of a society is determined by the average, not the outliers. Thus my desire for racial divorce is based simply on the recognition that whites and blacks as groups have irreconcilable differences that make it impossible for them to be fully happy when forced to live in the same system.
You can buy It’s Okay to Be White: The Best of Greg Johnson here.
All the common causes of no-fault divorce apply to the relationship of blacks and whites in America: on the whole, the races have different personalities, different lifestyles, different work and spending habits, etc. When forced to live in the same system, these differences create tensions. To use a trivial example, blacks have a very different sense of the passage of time, and when a long line of white people forms while a black Post Office clerk inanely chats away with the customer at the window, the result is resentment. We resent blacks for failing to live up to our standards, and blacks resent us for imposing white standards in the first place.
These problems are not based on history but on nature. Even without black slavery and black crime — even if the past could be completely wiped away and blacks and whites could start fresh on a desert island — these differences would give rise to new frictions and new resentments.
Given these differences, it should come as no surprise that relations between whites and blacks are poisoned with endless bickering, distrust, contempt, and long-simmering resentment and bitterness. Reciprocity is central to our idea of moral conduct, and unequal peoples cannot practice real reciprocity.
Again, if this were a marriage, it would have ended in divorce a long time ago. Any responsible marriage counselor would recommend a no-fault divorce as quickly as possible, because such a relationship is on the road to a fault divorce, when bitterness becomes hatred and hatred becomes violence.
It is false to claim that White Nationalism is based simply on racial hatred. As the author of Confessions of a Reluctant Hater, I do not deny that hatred plays a role. But I believe that hatred must be seen primarily as the product, rather than the cause, of bad racial relationships. I hate other groups because of multiculturalism. I believe in racial divorce because I don’t want to hate other groups.
Most people who divorce do not simply hate one another. Presumably, they originally married out of affection. So usually there is a love-hate relationship. And although blacks and whites in America were forced together — the equivalent of a shotgun marriage — elements of genuine affection have still managed to grow up between the races. So there is a love-hate relationship here as well.
But in some cases, there is no hatred in divorce at all. Both parties simply recognize that they would be happier on their own, and they cordially separate. Furthermore, once people divorce, it is not uncommon for them to like one another more. It is easier to admire some people at a distance. Some people remember why they got married in the first place. Some even make the same mistake twice.
The main reason why individuals are willing to stay in unhappy and even abusive marriages is the conviction that their own happiness does not matter. They believe that duties to God or community or family are more important. Or they believe that they deserve to be unhappy because of feelings of guilt and worthlessness. Divorce is legitimate only if individual happiness is legitimate.
The same is true of bad racial relationships as well. Whites will never be free until we recover the conviction that we have the right to be happy, to flourish as a race rather than just fill the stomachs and empty the bedpans of the Third World.
When Barack Obama prissily reminds whites of the alleged horrors of the Crusades a millennium ago, lest headlines about ISIS give us any ideas about separation from the Muslim world today, or when Jews traumatize our children with Holocaust “education,” we have to see them for what they are: abusive spouses telling us that we are worthless, that we do not deserve to be happy, to keep us in subordinate, exploitative, parasitic relationships.
There is nothing more obscene than being exploited because of one’s conscience, by means of one’s conscience, by those who lack conscience altogether.
White Nationalists tend to be uncomfortable with divorce. We think that divorce rates are too high, because people are too individualistic and unwilling to compromise or to grow as individuals to make marriages and families work. But for all that, we recognize that individual happiness still matters, and that, try as we must, some marriages cannot work and should be dissolved for the good of all.
Our reluctance to condone divorce and our willingness to work to save even doomed marriages should give us insight into the minds of white liberals, many of whom are trying to make multiculturalism work out of the same essentially decent motives.
Yet white liberals are also willing — perhaps too willing — to condone divorce on the grounds of individual happiness. We need to make this tendency work for us. White Nationalism will seem much more appealing if our people come to see that multiculturalism is a marriage made in hell.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
12 comments
***||| ….lest headlines about ISIS give us any ideas about separation from the Muslim world today… |||***
Yes, we have differences and that we should dwell in our own lands, but as far as ‘ISIS’ was concerned, it was the creation of the same (((forces))) which put a police officer in the dock for doing his job.
I didn’t form my opinion of contemporary American Whites or the White race by reading the hateful editorials and reports of Jew York Times or consuming nonsensical non-White publications.
I hope my White friends too would not rely on the Jewphilic media when they form their opinion on Islam and the Muslim world.
I have absolutely no problem with Islam and the Muslim world; as long as it stays in the Muslim world, and away from Christendom.
That’s the rub though, innit?
I wrote as much, however, lately, it is the nasty political elites of Christendom that have been intervening in and inviting people from the Islamic world thus making life difficult (perhaps deliberately) for their own White native population.
Just because one receives an ‘invitation’ doesn’t mean it has to be accepted. I have no real issue with Islam and the Muslim world either, as long as it doesn’t arrive in the West and stays where it is. I can’t even imagine why someone with Muslim beliefs would want to come to a decadent liberal West, except for financial benefits of course. … So much for Islam taking the High Road. In my opinion, Muslims are just as unwelcome as any other non-White into my lands.
Islam is an imperialist territorial theocratic system.
It has been the enemy of the Christian world and its successor, the West, since its inception.
Even without ISIS, it would be, as it has always been, incompatible with European civilization.
This is as deftly argued case for racial separation as I’ve seen. One major obstacle to racial divorce is the property settlement. That will be something that will have to be negotiated, so it would be a mistake to become wedded to one scheme, but I’d like to see Mr Johnson’s thoughts on the subject.
There’s more of us. We are, as a whole, richer than the 40% non-white pop. Easy enough to buy them out, no? Especially of We can regain control of the printing press from our small hat friends. Blacks and browns own less property anyway.
The hard part IMO will be getting the white folks residing in the territories that will be given away to leave their homes and heritages behind.
But it will happen whether we like it or not. So we might as well do it now, while we have some semblance of a numerical and monetary advantage and can thus conceivably drive a harder bargain.
Case in point: I’m currently visiting family in Los Angeles. My father is the last remaining family resident on the last remains parcel what was once our family “compound”. When the patriarch, my granddad, died, his sons began selling everything off.
It’s a Saturday night and I’m hearing Arabic type music being blasted from the house my grandfather built and where I spent the best years of my childhood.
It’s over, and not by my choice. Its time to go while we still can. I see this as a small example of the terrible tragedy that is unfolding in what was once our country.
White flight has been the only option open to us for decades. In Mr. Johnson’s marriage terms, we’ve been abandoning our nonwhite “spouses” in droves for ages. Unfortunately, the options of where to flee are growing steadily less and less, with many having no option but to suffer in endless abusive relationships. It’s getting more and more difficult for people to find separation. A tipping point, if not already reached, will occur very soon.
Thank you for your two very excellent articles today, Greg.
Problem is, they don’t want a divorce. They really don’t even know what they want aside from black vengeance and what jew or white liberal tells them they want. The only way they could achieve that is hang on our legs until they give out.
There is no point is trying to ever reason with them. For blacks, in the end it’s all or nothing. The MORE they are given, the more they want.
I was having a big laugh at the amount of praise dished out to Marcus Garvey among blacks this past Black History Month. When a white person presents them with Garvey’s exact beliefs and suggestions they are outraged. They don’t even have the intelligence to know or understand what their own leaders and intellectuals thought and for all the praise for Garvey, I have yet to see any blacks show any initiative or trying to continue what he tried to start.
These blacks can’t understand that is Garvey was alive today, he would be far more interested in a sit down talk with Jarrod Taylor than any BLM marxist black. Something they would never wish to do.
To compare blacks and whites in America with Czechs and Slovaks in the former Czechoslovakia is seriously misguided. The vast majority of Czechs were living in Czechia and nearly all Slovaks were living in Slovakia. Political separation is easy when there is already geographic separation, as was the case with the Czechs and Slovaks.
That is definitely not the case with blacks and whites in the US. There are blacks and whites in all states. The blackest US state is Mississippi, but even there blacks are no more than 37% of the population. Given that whites and blacks are so geographically mixed, political separation would be a nightmare with frightful consequences.
Brilliant article, as usual. There is no reason, either, why there should be animosity between states after the divorce as well, as long as they stay in their state. After all, a black state will surely require plenty of malt liquor and tennis shoes, and not have any one smart enough to make them. So a White state will have a brisk trade with a future failed black state.
And what form of currency will they use to buy their Jordan’s, menthol and malt likkkah once they are off our welfare rolls? BlakkBuxx? I wonder how long it would be before BlakkBuxx beats Zimbabwe in the hyperinflation race?
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.