902 words
Attention all tax-payers! Are you aware you are being forced to fund your own replacement with millions of random financial deadweights from abroad? Of course you are, you read Counter-Currents. But what about readers of other, more mainstream, old-news outlets, like the dead-tree press? How well informed are they about such indisputable facts?
In March last year The Daily Telegraph, the most Right-wing of UK broadsheets, reported the nation’s foolish Treasury was vomiting away £7.5 billion each year on funding Bangladeshis to breed and Uzbeks to be unemployed. According to the newspaper’s detailed analysis, over a million foreigners were likely to be in receipt of a specific domestic welfare benefit called Universal Credit, with Congolese, Iraqis, and Afghans claiming it at four times the rate of native Brits. So, quite commendably, sometimes these trends are indeed reported in mainstream outlets, just like they are on Counter-Currents. . . but for how much longer?
One year later, in March 2026, this same story came back to bite the Telegraph, when the UK press regulator IPSO intervened to officially censure the newspaper for printing it—on the specific grounds that it was true. Initially, the Telegraph published its scoop based upon extrapolations made from then-available incomplete data: extrapolations which subsequently released Government figures later showed to be true. IPSO accepted the Telegraph’s story reflected these later released official Government figures, which were accurate, and that therefore the story was indeed correct. And this, of course, was a major problem.
Prompted by a single reader complaint from a lone libtard, the regulator pedantically ruled that, between the time the Telegraph’s original data had been compiled and the publication of the story, some of the foreigners concerned may potentially have legally gained passports magically making them British, and therefore, viewed from a certain angle (i.e., a false one), the description of the foreigners as being foreigners at all could technically have been considered inaccurate after all—even if they were born in foreign lands, had foreign names, and were foreign. Accordingly, the newspaper was forced to print a prominent public apology. . . for telling the truth.
As the Telegraph argued in a subsequent editorial:
If the result [of the ruling] is farcical, the implications are not. IPSO was invited by the complainant to intervene on a topic it acknowledges is of ‘significant public interest and debate’ in a manner which arguably would have put a thumb on one side of the scales. Government data on sensitive topics is, shall we say, frequently published in less than ideal form, if it is published at all. In the absence of official figures, the national discourse must often rest on attempts to construct estimates of what that data might indicate if it were freely available. A policy which deprecates all but iron-clad official statistics presented in the most anodyne of terms would jeopardise the ability of newspapers to contribute to this conversation. The watchdog risks enforcing a consensus on issues [like immigration] where no such consensus actually exists … IPSO has begun to intervene in contested issues almost as if they are settled matters of fact. Such adjudications could diminish the diversity of opinion on offer in the national press. This would be to the great detriment of informed public discourse.
Some may argue that “to diminish the diversity of opinion” (the only kind of diversity these people don’t like) on offer in the public sphere is precisely the point of such interfering media watchdogs. IPSO is, supposedly, a voluntary body for individual British newspapers to join, much as mafia protection rackets are voluntary for individual shopkeepers to join. These same papers have to pay a fee to be members, which means that, ultimately, IPSO is funded by ordinary newspaper purchasers—who are therefore being duped into unknowingly handing over their cover-price each morning in order to fund an organization explicitly devoted towards preventing their chosen daily reads from telling them the truth about the twisted anti-white world they actually live in.
Needless to say, this present website is not compromised in any such manner. Counter-Currents isn’t a member of any similar “regulatory” body to IPSO, and won’t be joining one any time soon: IPSO facto, this will never happen. But, unlike the neutered newspapers—which are now increasingly forced to hide the truth about the Great Replacement by their own regulators, the above case literally proves it—Counter-Currents doesn’t have a cover-price at all. Nor does it have much by way of advertising revenue. So, we humbly rely upon donations from ordinary Joes and Jolines like you to keep us going.
If you could spare a small donation (or even a large one, a large donation is also good) to Counter-Currents to help us with our work, then please do so. It’s far cheaper than buying a quasi-state-censored newspaper every day, and often far more informative. Counter-Currents carries all the news that Big Brothers like IPSO think is not fit to print. That’s why, unlike most newspapers these days, it’s still worth reading. On the other hand, you can’t shine your shoes or wipe your posterior clean with it, but I suppose you can’t have everything. Like a more traditional physical newspaper, you can still light a fire with it, though: the fire of knowledge and awareness.
Here is how you can help:
- Donate here by Credit Card (NEW),
- Donate by echeck below.
- Explore other options on the donate page here.
3 comments
I’m submitting a CC fundraising idea – I m confident it will work.
We set up a live – “best female Identitarian influencer” and readers can vote in a $ auction on who they like best.
It will be a mix of both a White beauty contest, with fun and often insulting commentary about the contestants body counts, mud sharking etc and also on the quality of their social media influencing. We can offer the contestants some publicity if they win, maybe a % of the money raised though that probably won’t work, it will probably result in something like Ron Paul making a big deal about returning the campaign contribution of the
EVIL WHITE RACIST STORMFRONT HOST DON BLACK.
Yeah, It’s probably best not to offer any $ to the winners.
This should be a great fun and raise some solid $.
So here are some Hu White women influencers that I’d like to nominate:
Brett Cooper – she was formerly the highly rated Daily Wife “The Comment Section with Bret Cooper” and she was staring in an alternative traditionalist Snow White movie to counter the God Awful Woke, Feminist Disney live action move staring the bitc* Latina actress with the Je* last name Rachel Zegler. As I recall Brett Cooper left the Daily Wire because of some principled dispute with the Daily Wire Je* owner Ben Shapiro.
Lilly Gaddis – IMO a solid pick she’s principled, names Black criminality, BLK BlackLiesMatter and occasionally “Names the Je*”. IMO she’s very attractive in a healthy, not slutty way
Leonarda Jonie – very funny comedian from the Bronx, very tough, very based, race realist, names the J, opposes Je Zionist wars in Gaza, Iran, AIPAC etc. Leonarda J is IMO really GREAT at insulting East Indians, ANTIFA, LGBT Pro Abortion Fat ugly women – I Leo her act and really like her – probably some “issues” with past ‘Dating” but I go with the Christian idea of embracing reformed sinners.
Pearl something – she had a big following, seemed to have had a niche taking the side of (White) men against hosing women, promoting the idea that everything good was built and maintained by men.
Lauren Southern – Canadian SM influencer worked for, with Rebel Media – very pretty. I haven’t heard much from her lately – did she drop out, renounce her evil White racist ways, marry a Je*? Adopt Black Haitian orphans? Sell her mind, body and soul to AIPAC, the ADL?
That’s just a short list, what comes to my mind.
I envisions something like a blog with lots of nominations, photos of good looking, sexy but not slutty photos of these women. Commentary by our women readers (do we have any?) on the size of their rivals’ butts – that’s a big thing women think about ALL THE TIME.
Let’s have some fun with this and raise some $ for CC
JR
I really hate to tell you this, but I think you have mistaken C-C for a jewy day time talk show, like Jerry Springer or some such monstrosity. You should contact Zionist Fox fake news with your idea, they have a lot of jewy and ethnic females like some of the ones you describe. You may have a hit.
You shouldn’t “Hate” yourself for expressing your honest opinion about my propaganda suggestions, outlook etc. Good for you.
And yes you are right, I am advocating a much lower end, lower class, mass propaganda appealing forms of media content. Maybe not as low as the Jerry Springer show, more like Rupert Murdoch’s very successful Tabloid newspaper media in England and Australia that featured Center Right, nationalist politics (yeah, I know didn’t “name the J) with working class sports featured – Football/Soccer instead of Golf or Bruce Springsteen’s spoiled daughters Equestrian Olympic competition and (This is Key).
Sexy White young women in swimsuits or even topless “The Page 3 girl”, Celebrity gossip etc.
No this isn’t high brow Greek Philosophy, Stoicism, Austrian School of (J) economics, Martin Heidegger in Chicago or (my favorite) Savitri Devi time cycle views of history and religion.
My view is to go more the way of Goebbels and George Lincoln Rockwell of Alfred Rosenberg the official NS Court Philosopher who wrote the largest selling book in German history that nobody really read (Goebbels).
IMO most of the excellent articles on Counter Currents are going over the head of the average American, British, English speaking White working men and these are the men and the women that love them, these are the Hu Whites we need. GL Rockwell stated this as a critical principle of his activism.
“Rockwell believed that it was time for the White Man to take America back from the aliens, the minorities and the terrorists now in power under the demagoguery of cheap politicians. To do this we must win not the few in the right-wing, or the upper classes, but the millions and millions of our people. And to win these people we must offer something besides a lot of empty platitudes about freedom and the Constitution. Only National Socialism has a positive and progressive program for all the people, rather than just the upper class, and combines a concern for the purity and protection of the great White race with a fighting determination to stop all further mongrelization of our people.”
I respond:
GL Rockwell, Goebbels, Rupert Murdoch, Lee Atwater were very very good, every effective at Propaganda which is IMO both a science and an art.
In contrast, my experience in various American Conservative, Right Wing, Trad Christian or even White identity activism/politics is these Hu White people tend to be not very good at propaganda. And yes, some of the Js in the media you mentioned like the very low class, vulgar Jerry Springer or worse Maury Povitch “Jamal You ARE the father”, pervert Js such as Harvey Weinstein – they are crude, vulgar by they are effective in getting large audiences, including large audiences of Whites. And the J Jerry Springer once was elected Mayor of Cincinnati OH!
JR
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.