2,339 words
The following was originally published in Polish in July 2023 in the Do Rzeczy weekly magazine. This translation was published at the English-language Polish conservative site Sovereignty.pl.
Laurent Obertone wrote a novel about France’s descent into civil war in 2016 with the title Guerrilla. The description on the back cover reads:
Police intervention in a no-go district turns into a drama: a policeman caught in an ambush loses his nerve and fires indiscriminately. The district goes up in flames and the whole country is teetering. Fire spreads from city to city and the Republic disintegrates.
Obertone described a situation in which the cumulative actions of angry suburban youth, Islamic terrorists, and Leftist militias led to the collapse of the French Republic in just a few days. Was it a similar spark that fell on the French powder keg on June 27?
What will happen next?
It all started in Nanterre, a city on the outskirts of Paris. According to the prosecutors’ preliminary findings, two police motorcyclists spotted a yellow Mercedes A-class car with Polish plates (many car rental companies in France insure and register cars in Poland–Ed.) driving at high speed in a bus lane. The police officers began a chase with their flashers on. When the car stopped at a traffic light, they attempted to pull the driver over, but he set off again and ran the red light. The man behind the wheel was 17-year-old Nahel Merzouk. He did not have a driver’s license and already had a police record, including for his previous refusals to stop for traffic checks.
Further pursuit of the young man of Algerian origin and his two passengers lasted over 20 minutes. The driver ran more red lights and nearly hit a pedestrian and a cyclist at a pedestrian crossing, but he then got stuck in traffic. The two police officers got off their motorcycles and pulled out their guns. But when the traffic cleared, Nahel pushed the accelerator again. One of the officers fired and hit Nahel in the chest through his left arm. The policeman’s lawyer claims that he was aiming at his leg, and that the movement of the car pushed up the arm holding the gun. The officers also claim that they were scared that the vehicle would press them against the wall behind them.
A 17-year-old friend and one of Nahel’s passengers that night stated in a video he posted online that the second police officer had said, “Shoot him.” But after analyzing the video footage, the IGPN (the French police inspectorate) concluded that the police officers only shouted for the driver to turn off his engine and ordered him to put his hands behind his head.
An “angel” vs. “racism” in the police force
The identity of the police officer who fired the shot has not been disclosed. All that is known is that he is 38 years old, married, and has children. He is a former member of the military. For the past year he had been a police motorcyclist in the Hauts-de-Seine department, where Nanterre is located. No specific issues have been reported in his past service. On the contrary, two years ago he was decorated for bravery after apprehending the perpetrator of a kidnapping and robbery. This was not his first decoration, and he has received letters of congratulations eight times for his service in the police.
Nahel, whom football star Kylian Mbappé, a Frenchman of Algerian descent by his mother and Cameroonian descent by his father, called an “angel” in a comment after the shooting was no angel. Before he was killed while attempting to flee the police, he had been arrested 12 times for driving without a license, drug use and possession, and receiving stolen goods.
Without waiting for the investigation, a large part of the French political and media establishment began blaming the policeman and pointing to racism in the police. President Emmanuel Macron himself said Nahel’s death was “inexcusable,” which clearly implied the police officer’s guilt. Did he want to cool tempers by saying this? If so, it rather had the opposite effect. Likewise, arresting the officer as soon as he was charged, while in such a case a police officer would normally stand trial without being detained, did not help.
French police officers are accustomed to being treated thusly in clashes with young criminals from “sensitive” urban districts. Many years ago a good friend of mine, a policeman working in the eighth district of Lyon at the time, told me that if he sees a white Frenchman of mature age running a red light, he will chase him down and stop him. But if he sees a group of young Arabs failing to stop at a red light, driving an expensive car that is possibly stolen, then he pretends not to notice. Otherwise, whatever happens, the policeman will be on the losing end. If there is resistance, he will either be killed by better-armed opponents or risks shooting someone down and getting “screwed up” because his superiors will not take his side. At best, the young immigrants will not resist — but then a judge will simply let them go, so it is a waste of time.
Such cowardice on the part of superiors in the police and gendarmerie and those ruling the country at various levels has been around since at least the beginning of the century, and this has been a characteristic of both Left-wing and center-Right governments.
The French know this, as was shown by the fact that a fundraiser for the family of the jailed police officer had already attracted over one million euros after just four days. It was set up by Jean Messiha, a former politician from Marine Le Pen’s party, and later from Éric Zemmour’s party. Messiha is himself a Frenchman of Egyptian (Coptic) origin. The amount raised by Messiha far exceeded another fundraiser for Nahel Merzouk’s family.
In this case, the politicians’ and mainstream media’s cowardice was accompanied by that of France’s far Left, including the parliamentary Left, who expressed their support for the angry youths from the suburbs. These, on just the second evening after the young Algerian was shot dead, went on to attack law enforcement officers and other representatives of the hated French Republic, including firefighters engaged in putting out the fires they had lit. Cars, buses, and trams were burning. There have also been cases of Molotov cocktails being thrown at public transportation, so it was decided to shut down evening mass transit in major cities and impose night curfews in many municipalities. The “protesters” targeted police stations and posts, courts, city and town halls, libraries, schools, kindergartens, passing cars (especially with whites inside), city infrastructure, and so on. In Lyon’s city center an explosive detonated in front of a post office during the unrest, fortunately outside opening hours.
Less than a week after Nahel Merzouk’s death, the head of the MEDEF employers’ union estimated the losses generated by the unrest to private businesses at about €1 billion. Preliminary estimates put the direct cost of damage to public infrastructure at around €200–250 million. In the Paris metropolitan area alone, 25 city buses and two trams were completely destroyed in less than a week.
Of the 45,000 police and gendarmes deployed by the Interior Ministry, more than 700 suffered injuries in the course of six nights.
The growing scale of violence
The last time riots on this scale, involving cities in different parts of the country, took place in France was in 2005, following the deaths of two teenagers who were electrocuted in a transformer substation where they had hidden while fleeing from police. But police officers and gendarmes say the scale of the violence and its fury was greater this time, and that social media have contributed to a much faster spread of rioting and to incomparably greater coordination among participants. In addition, this time the violence also spilled over into city centers.
The rioters, as can be seen and heard in photos and videos as well as on social media, are mostly people of color, largely Arabs and blacks. They often invoked Allah and referred to their Muslim identity. For example, in the town of Givors (not far from where I grew up myself, south of Lyon), when an elderly Frenchman began firing a shotgun in the direction of a destructive mob, the call went out on social media: “Someone is shooting at Muslims!” In the Breton city of Brest, meanwhile, a group was gathering on a messaging platform to attack a gay bar, with calls to crack down on “fags” “in the name of the Qur’an” and “Allah.” The bar had to close quickly. Media outlets all over the world published a photo of a Muslim woman at the funeral of young Nahel. She was dressed in a burqa, leaving only her eyes visible (which is forbidden in public in France). She was also carrying a placard with the inscription, “Justice for Nahel! Allah y rahmo!” (“May Allah be merciful to him”).
Some of the most shocking incidents of violence included the massive looting of stores in the famous Les Halles shopping malls in Paris’ First District, the attack on a bus carrying Chinese tourists in Paris as well, and the attack on two police officers in Marseilles. The two men were recognized as they were returning home in civilian clothes after work. They were stabbed and then kicked on the ground by a group of enthusiastic young Arabs, and had to be evacuated to a hospital with serious injuries. Today in France many families of police officers live in fear, as their names and addresses often circulate on the Internet, and they are sometimes recognized and assaulted on the streets. Often, it does not seem to matter to the attackers that a policewoman happens to be with her young children.
One of the most drastic events in the days of major unrest was the attempted arson attack on the house of the Mayor in the town of L’Haÿ-les-Roses on the outskirts of Paris. While the mayor himself, Vincent Jeanbrun, was on guard at the town hall, which was surrounded with barbed wire, his wife and children, aged 5 and 7, were at home. The attackers rammed the gate of their property with a car, then set the car on fire and tried to push it onto the veranda in front of the house. When Mrs. Jeanbrun fled the house through the back exit with her children, they pursued her for some time. Fortunately, she was rescued, but she had to be taken to a hospital with a broken leg, and one of her children had a cut above one eye. The local prosecutor’s office has opened an investigation into a possible crime of attempted premeditated murder.
On June 30 two major police unions, UNSA-Police and Alliance, issued a communiqué stating that “France is already at war” and that “in the face of savage hordes,” republican order must be “restored” and these “vermin” must be neutralized by force, using “all means to restore the rule of law as soon as possible.” The message also warns the government of Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne and President Macron that once the situation is under control, police officers will enter a phase of “resistance” in the face of politicians’ inaction and lack of support for those in charge of law enforcement.
After a week of unrest, it seemed that France’s law enforcement was beginning to get the situation back under control. The number of riots and attacks on people (mostly white) and property was falling, as well as the number of police officers injured and arrests made on successive nights. The first fast-track prison sentences were kicking in. The fast-track judicial procedures apply only to adults, and the average age of those arrested was 17. A week after Nahel’s death, 360 of the approximately 3,300 arrested had heard their sentences.
Experts and commentators warn against excessive optimism, however. “This situation should be analyzed not in terms of what is happening now, but in terms of what could happen if it gets out of control,” Gendarmerie Colonel Philippe Cholous said on Sunday, July 2 on CNews . He further pointed out:
There is anger in the suburbs, of course, but I think there is also anger among the middle class, the decent citizens, France’s working people. There is also great resentment among the forces of law and order, who are very often left out to dry by the political classes. Nahel’s sad death was an example of this. . . . The level of irritation and resentment, the level of violence, and above all, the fact that in some areas there is real hatred of France and weapons circulating: all this makes the situation potentially explosive. And just because fewer vehicles are being set on fire or fewer stores are being looted doesn’t mean the potential risk is diminishing.
Will the events that shocked France and the world after a police officer shot down a 17-year-old be a sobering experience for the French? Will the French political class, outside of Marine Le Pen’s camp, which has been warning against such a development since at least the 1980s, finally begin to push for the national interest, restore the rule of law, and put the brakes on immigration, where numbers have been breaking new records under successive presidents? Officers of the gendarmerie, army, and counterintelligence services have long warned of the danger of civil war in France, and top politicians have also pointed out the existence of such a risk. In 2018 Macron’s first Interior Minister, Gérard Collomb — after resigning from his post — warned that the French were living side-by-side, but could soon be facing each other. Speaking to reporters, he explained that he believed France had about five or six years left to reverse the process, after which it would be too late. Although a socialist, he also made it clear that he saw a close connection between excessive immigration and the decay of French society.
That was five years ago. Isn’t it already too late?
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
The%20Last%20Alarm%20Call%20Before%20Civil%20War%20in%20France%3F
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
A Farewell to Reason: Houellebecq’s Annihilation
-
Washing Away the NAXALT Fallacy
-
The NAXALT Argument & What’s Wrong With It
-
Mechanisms of Information Distribution
-
The Worst Week Yet: August 18-24, 2004
-
Let’s Party Like It’s 1789!
-
Sonya Massey Is This Election Cycle’s George Floyd
-
The Fall of Minneapolis
6 comments
A few remarks — I’m French, unfortunately, and I live in exile in what is no longer my country.
Ordinary people are not armed, whether by force or by will. When the fight (“civil war” is not adequate a word here for it won’t be a war between brothers — unless brotherhood is defined as having a national ID card) starts, only one side will have the tools required — knives or guns — and the will to use them. Even rightists here cannot understand the first two admentments of U.S. Constitution. I’ve personally tried to have not too stupid people read Lemieux’s *Le droit de porter des armes* a.k.a. *The Right to Bear Arms*, one of the best books on this topic, without success.
The police is no longer here “to serve and protect” the citizens. It’s now a mere milice for the oligarchy. What is funny is that without the cops, the system collapses (Anatole France already stated it). Yet, the oligarchy can afford to despise its only defense against peoples — with an s : the imported ones, and the local one. It’s because the police and military only “honor” is to obey as dogs. A friend of mine coined the portemanteau word “milichiens” in order to refer to them. When they’re told to hit the average Joe with a yellow jacked, they do it with enthousiasm ; when they’re told not to do anything serious against other kinds of people, they do it too (accidents do happen, but they are accidents : a few years ago, two policemen burnt in their car because they did not dare to use their guns !). Oddly enough, they have the right to say “We merely obey orders”, while civil servants and the like are supposed to have their conscience guide them against the Hideous Beast’s orders, should it happen.
An Hideous Beast who is not the Blonde. She and her minions are so keen to be accepted by the mainstream they now condemn everything a little rightist. The R.N. will betray, as the others, including Les Patriotes (Philippot), the U.P.R. (Asselineau), Zemmour (a mere journalist, not a stateman) and Dupont-Gnangnan (who tries and be the free electron while he has strong electoral links with Les Républicains). Nothing useful will come from the ballots and elections. Once elected, the Blonde will bow in front of Ursula, E.U. and N.A.T.O.
A few weeks ago, every media told the public about the revolt of the cops, angry for a corporate reason (not for a public safety one !). It’s been handled with money and advantages, and no one seems to remember the state was about to fall. Abel Bonnard has stated it in *Les modérés* : “Ce qui plaît à une telle classe, ce qui lui convient, ce qui lui sourit, ce n’est pas une monarchie avec des principes, c’est une anarchie avec des gendarmes.” — roughly translated : “What pleases such a class, what is most convenient for her, what make her smile, it’s not a monarchy with principles, it’s an anarchy with gendarmes.”
Considering the current situation, unless a miracle, the France is down for ever, and a few people had seen this as soon as 1980 and possibly 1968 (such as Gaxotte). As they have not been listened to… “Whom Jupiter wishes to destroy, the god makes him open his eyes and see the situation as it it really.” 😉
Now, as an American f[r]iend told me a few months ago, “It’s France, ergo nothing.”
People wanting to check the progress of savagery here can have a look at fdesouche Web site : this press review (in French) is more and more frightening, not only because of the criminals but also of the friends they have in the System.
P.S. : Sorry for the typos and for the syntax. Poorer and poorer eyesight ; besides, English is a read-only language to me. 😉
As a neighbor, I suffer with you!
Thank you for your comment.
It’s the “white disease” everywhere. I suspected this as far back as the 80s, but kept persuading myself that it was merely the controlled media that prevented any mass reaction. The 2002 French Presidential race utterly disabused me of any remaining white racial illusions. The French finally had a chance to vote for the great Le Pen pere (I don’t know how to do internet accents). A chance to vote against what was perfectly clear to this American, who hadn’t been to France since the 70s, was a foreign invasion, colonization and conquest – not just a Great Replacement of an indigenous people by foreigners, but a replacement of a great and virtuous people by worthless aliens, criminals and jihadi scum.
What happened? Unless the vote was rigged (which is possible, but why haven’t other anti-NWO votes been rigged?), Le Pen could not even muster a fifth of the vote. Less than a fifth of Frenchmen wanted to preserve their ancient nation (if aliens with French IDs are allowed to vote in French elections, then maybe it was a quarter or even a third of the indigenous who supported Le Pen; it certainly wasn’t half, or the landslide it should have been). The vote should have been 82-18 for Le Pen.
That was a defining event in my life. I realized then that whites are an evolutionarily defective race destined to be replaced by more racist races. I realized that I do not care about whites as whites; I care only about “true whites”, or prowhites. We are the ones we must save. We must figure out how to create prowhite majorities in a few sovereign territories, white “reservations” and places of refuge for our people wherein our race can be preserved across the new planetary Racial Dark Ages we’ve already entered. Such ethnostates can serve as racial lifeboats until some far future time when a portion of our forfeited racial power shall have been reestablished (perhaps by breeding up, both genetically as well as culturally, a new white race within our territories), and we can begin to expand again into territories formerly our own.
In the 80s, I wondered why Le Pen did not have the idea of chosing a province and, as a new Moses, have all his supporters move there in order to create a small state. Alas, with his virtues, he was not really into grabbing the power : being the outside #5 seems enough for him.
One can dream a country placed under Freedom and Responsability flags, without a single one collectivist. Considering current populations and trends, it’s very unlikely.
Alphonse Allais, supposed to be a mere humorist, has had this idea and he expressed it in this paper which should have been taken and applied seriously :
https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/On_n%E2%80%99est_pas_des_b%C5%93ufs/D%C3%A9centralisation
(Sorry, I don’t know of any English translation).
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment