Counter-Currents
The Case for Trump 2024
Anti-Zionism vs Preserving the First Amendment
Hunter Wallace
1,157 words
As an activist, I have to weigh the importance of various issue priorities. Is the most important issue preserving the First and Second Amendment or anti-Zionism?
If I am being completely honest, I am ranking Israel, Iran and anti-Zionism as being less important in how I plan to vote in the 2024 election. When Donald Trump was president, I covered almost every moment that Trump sucked up to Jews and Israel. Every single article that I wrote about that is still in the archives. In the 2020 election, I was angry and alienated from Trump and bought into the argument which was pushed by activists that “at least Biden would be better on Israel, Palestine and Iran policy.”
In 2024, Joe Biden has presided over a genocide in Gaza and lynchings by Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Israeli soldiers are sodomizing male Palestinian prisoners while mobs protest any attempt to punish them. Israel is on the verge of war with Hezbollah in Lebanon. A proxy war with Iran has broken out in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. Israel has assassinated Hezbollah and Hamas leaders and IRGC commanders all over the Middle East. Congress has given Israel a record $26 billion in foreign aid and Joe Biden has signed a bill to force the sale of TikTok because there was too much criticism of Israel on social media. Also, thousands of people were arrested on college campuses in a massive crackdown for protesting the war in Gaza at the behest of top Democratic donors, which dwarfs what happened under Trump.
Having seen Joe Biden’s foreign policy, I am not persuaded that Donald Trump losing the 2024 election is 1.) a victory for Palestinian human rights or 2.) restrains Israel in any meaningful way or 3.) deescalates tensions with Iran or 4.) “sends a message” which is a victory for anti-Zionism. I am not persuaded that it will end Donald Trump’s political career. After all, he lost the 2020 election and came right back with the same pro-Israel foreign policy. Donald Trump losing the 2024 election does nothing about Jewish control of the media or Jewish donors purchasing our foreign policy or old people who are pro-Israel and who made up their minds back in the 1970s and 1980s. Instead, a Kamala Harris victory will be interpreted as a victory for the Jewish donors who are more powerful than ever after forcing Joe Biden to quit the race and who crushed the pro-Palestinian protests on the Left. It will be seen as a defeat for anti-Zionism.
Regardless of who wins the 2024 election, the next president is going to have a pro-Israel foreign policy because that is what the donor class and the public wants. In the long term, I think activists will prevail on the issue due to older voters cycling out of the electorate, the steady erosion of Israel’s public image and growing splits within the Jewish community. Ultimate victory for anti-Zionists is far from guaranteed though. It depends on the state of free speech on the internet and specifically on platforms like X and Rumble which are now the only means available to influence the national conversation.
When Donald Trump won the presidency in 2016, online free speech went into recession and to this day has never recovered. Donald Trump’s enemies unleashed an unprecedented deplatforming and censorship campaign. The Left completely wiped out nationalists on every internet platform which they controlled from YouTube to Facebook to iTunes. Trump himself was deplatformed from Twitter and Facebook after January 6. They used the DOJ to prosecute Ricky Vaughn for memes in the 2016 campaign. New York Attorney General Letitia James crushed VDARE which was strangled by years of lawfare and cancel culture. The Left has used state and corporate power to silence their opposition. In contrast, nationalists have been replatformed on X and Rumble and compete with conservative influencers.
If activists can get back on social media platforms like X and Rumble and batter Israel’s public image and it continues to deteriorate from death by a thousand cuts, anti-Zionists will likely succeed in undermining the pro-Israel “bipartisan consensus,” as younger voters already dislike Israel based on what they are seeing on the internet. Alternatively, if Kamala Harris wins the presidency and uses the federal government to retaliate against Elon Musk and strangle X, then the reach of activists will be greatly diminished and everyone will be ushered back to Gab and Telegram prison. Kamala Harris could also replace Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court. She will stack the federal courts with judges who will take us down the same road as the UK where activists are thrown in prison for “incitement to racial hatred.”
For any number of reasons, it is better for Trump and Musk to prevail in the 2024 election than Kamala Harris, but especially on the issue of internet free speech. Musk is also influencing the other tech bros and a Trump victory in the 2024 election could end up loosening the current stifling restrictions on free speech. A Kamala Harris victory followed by a successful campaign of punishment against Musk will have exactly the opposite effect. Owning Trump for a cheap laugh isn’t worth it and will only end up damaging the ability of activists and content creators to get their message out to the public.
Note:
In the UK, activists recently held a rally for Sam Melia outside the prison where he is incarcerated in for distributing It’s OK To Be White stickers. Patriotic Alternative is banned from X, but Musk himself has used the platform to echo their message to the entire world.
As usual, the point of this article is to explain my own thinking because otherwise you would not understand the shifts in my position. I am not telling you to vote for Donald Trump. You are capable of making your own decisions. This is my attempt to flesh out my own inner monologue.
1. The Right finally moves on from Trump in 2028
2. The Alt-Right has terrible political instincts
3. Joe Biden has been a sedative as president
4. Activist brain blinds us and creates prejudice against conservative normies
5. Trump is the leader because he is the best of the Republicans
6. “Worse is better” is a cope and was tried in 2020 and maintains the status quo
7. Voting is not a sacrament. Few know this
8. Voting is not going to change anything about Zionism in the next four years
9. Activists have the chance to ride the Trump wave without making the same mistakes
10. Activists are running out of material because the Overton Window has shifted so much
11. Donald Trump is a hunted dog who has been backed into a corner
12. Donald Trump is a divider, not a uniter and his legacy will ultimately be useful for us
13. Winning is still better than losing at baseline
14. The Left is still the enemy and wants to take away our freedoms
15. The cause of anti-Zionism depends on internet free speech.
This article originally appeared on Occidental Dissent and is reposted here with permission.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
21 comments
This is one of the best arguments for voting for Trump that I have heard. A vote for Harris is a vote against free speech for dissidents.
Nonsense. Trump’s DOJ pursued White ‘activists’ at least as much – if not more – than Biden’s.
Keep in mind all the GOP elected officials who have voted for ‘hate speech’ laws specific to ‘antisemitism’.
There is nothing of value for pro-Whites at the level of continental politics.
Everything that has the potential to advance pro-White policies is occurring at the state and local level.
Investing anything in Trump is going to be wasted.
He exists to disappoint White people.
There is no excuse for any white preservationist NOT to vote for Trump (or if you prefer, to vote against woke-commie-alien Harris). Indeed, to reject Trump, the only even minimally acceptable candidate among all current major Presidential contenders, is a sign of, at best, childishness, at worst, actual racial treason. Do I need to spell out why? (Hint: there are at least a hundred more important reasons – from securing the border and mass illegal alien deportations, to free speech, gun and self-defense rights, and private property preservation – than “Who Is Best For Anti-Zionism?” [whaaaat?].)
I’ll say some other things, again. I am not Jewish (though I have many Jewish friends), and I think the US should stop being so slavishly devoted to the welfare of Israel. Of course we should end all blood tribute (ie, foreign aid). But the disgusting Palestinians – this people who majority support terrorists and rapists of the most savage character – are not our race’s friends (duh!). No Muslims are friends of the white man; indeed, along with Han supremacist China, the Islamic world is the West’s greatest geostrategic enemy (and the number one threat to our kinsmen in Europe).
Rather than sniveling like liberal patsies about Muslim well-being (there is, strange to say, a lot of, yes, liberalism in the prowhite movement, especially when it comes to Palestinian thugs), we should be advocating whatever policies increase tensions and hostilities between Muslims and white men. (This especially includes working to remove Turkey from NATO.) Only when Muslims are daily massacring whites across most or all of Europe might our overly innately Kantian, but now sadly ethically misguided, race finally develop the will to fight back – and it will only be via a broad-based international clash of civilizations, both ideological and military, between the white/Christian and Muslim worlds that there will be a chance to cleanse Europe, and restore it to its oppressed and increasingly diversitistically enslaved indigenous peoples.
Once white warriors have defeated and destroyed or deported the Muslim settler colonialists in Europe, the subsequent dismantling of Jewish structures of power within Europe (and perhaps within the Anglosphere, too) will follow easily. Get your priorities right, white man!
You will get nothing of value for White people from Trump/Vance. They exist solely to pretend that there’s a choice between mass legal immigration and mass legal immigration, that there’s a choice between more anti-White ‘civil rights’ decisions and more anti-White ‘civil rights’ decisions.
The key as whether Trump/Vance were going to be anything other than whores for their jew and Chamber of Commerce donors was the Trump/Vance repudiation of Project 2025.
Now, I didn’t like everything in the programme document, but it specifically targeted ‘civil rights’ law and legal precedents that have hurt Whites for more than half-a-century.
The jews don’t believe in free speech if it makes them ‘uncomfortable’
The jews don’t believe that White Americans should have a say in governing themselves if pro-White policies makes jews ‘uncomfortable’.
The jews are a 2000-year-old broken record saying the same thing over and over again: What’s in it for me?
Sadly, Evangelical Christians and other jew-cucked Whites always say ‘Whatever you want!’
Trump doesn’t exist to help Whites get what they need.
Trump exists to help Zionist jews get what they want.
Nothing in continental politics is about giving Whites anything.
At least the Harris/Walz campaign is willing to talk to Whites as Whites.
Trump helps keep Harris out of higher office, and that advances White interests by default.
And even if he does nothing else, Trump’s court appointments will be light years better than the Dream Team.
Also, although Biden-Harris gave lip service for muh Brown Palestinians, don’t be fooled. The Democrats are entirely run by the Joos. Bigly. This has been the case since 1972 at the least when my aunt was DNC Chair and said so.
Jews are at least 80 percent Democrat. Even if they register as and donate to Republicans to make controlled opposition, they actually sympathize and support Democrats much more.
And even if all this were not true, the idea that White Nationalists should support Palestine ─ ’cause the Joos won’t be a-liking that ─ is dumb. It just ain’t our fight and it is irrelevant anyway, especially if we could give it far less attention.
If we had any real power, it would be to stop massive billions of foreign aid going to Israel. Both parties are for sending megabucks to Israel, and either party will get ‘er done.
Trump is the lesser of two evils, which is important unless one thinks that accelerationism will change things (very doubtful).
If anything, Trump’s feet should be put to the fire to keep him honest and focused:
“It’s immigration, stupid.”
🙂
If anything, Trump’s feet should be put to the fire to keep him honest and focused
What’s the plan for doing that?
Well, in my state some Republicans have actually been called “White Nationalists” by the usual suspects. That is why I am voting for ex-Air Force officer Wendy Rogers who has been playing a leading Rightwing role in the Arizona State Senate.
Being c alled a White Nationalist by the Leftwing press is never the case with Democrats.
If candidates are close enough to White Nationalist interests and not shilling for Israel or washing the feet of Negroes, then I will likely be voting for the ones accused of White Nationalism by people whom I despise.
I agree that ballot-boxing (elections) is not going to create an ethnostate, but it can do some good, and not understanding how electioneering works does immense harm. I am less an expert than I would like.
I think it is clear that Trump was nearly assassinated recently by a Leftist punk. Like JFK, a shot going just an inch the other way and the historical outcome would have been different. I hope Trump takes this to heart and really means what he says and will therefore do something decent with Immigration.
Even if an elected Trump does nothing, his court picks before were infinitely better than Biden’s, and that won’t hand us victory but it is hugely important.
🙂
There is not such thing as ‘advancing’ White interests ‘by default’. That’s just another version of ‘Vote for the person who doesn’t care about Whites because the other person doesn’t care about Whites more’. Lesser of two evils advances evil by default.
American jews largely vote DNC. But, oddly, the jewish impact on the DNC is much less than the jewish impact on the GOP (in large part due to Evangelical Christians).
The DNC doesn’t kow-tow to jews like the GOP does, so if I want less jewish influence in politics, I should go with the Democrats, not the Republicans.
Your whole digression into ‘Palestine’ has nothing to do with anything I’ve said.
The issue in my mind is whether Trump deserves the White Nationalist Vote and I say ‘No, he does not’.
Concerned Whites need to realize that White interests are not advanced by either party and vote accordingly.
I’ve voted for many decades and what I’ve noticed is that in areas of immigration, inflation, trade, industrial policy, affirmative action, and nothing changed no matter who I voted for President.
Eventually, I came to the conclusion that there is no ‘two party system’, there is only one party with two flavors (both toxic).
I’m not cynical. I’ve just let the world educate me on how this ‘Presidential election’ thing actually works.
When you vote in the GOP, the GOP passes laws that would never have passed under the DNC.
When you vote in the DNC, the DNC passes laws that would never have passed under the GOP.
Reagan passed the largest amnesty for illegal aliens in American history. Was he a Democrat?
>> There is no such thing as ‘advancing’ White interests ‘by default’. That’s just another version of ‘Vote for the person who doesn’t care about Whites because the other person doesn’t care about Whites more’. Lesser of two evils advances evil by default. <<
I mainly agree, but I don’t agree that voting for Harris and some Shït-Lib from the People’s Republic of Minnesota is any kind of “protest” in favor of White interests.
It is very much possible to retard White interests by default. Actually, Harris-Walz will not retard White interests by default; they will actively fight hard against them.
I don’t think all White Minnesotans are bad people. One of the reasons that Trump lost Arizona in 2020 was because the White Boomers (mostly retired) packed up their stuff and went home to their ten-thousand lakes during the Covid panic instead of staying in Arizona to vote like they normally would have.
Arizona is a swing-state in 2024, so I hope that we can swing it back to the GOP. That will help downballot candidates too. Most of them are not RINOs like John McCain or Mitt Romney, neither of whom I voted for. (No, I did not vote for the Mulatto.)
>> American jews largely vote DNC. But, oddly, the jewish impact on the DNC is much less than the jewish impact on the GOP (in large part due to Evangelical Christians). <<
I think that last part is unproven. The TRS radio network are arguing that a vote for the GOP is a vote for the Joos, and many others so argue. But if their solution is to vote Harris, then that is just stupid. Of course, these people usually come from hard-Blue states like New York, so whether they vote at all for President matters little.
>> The DNC doesn’t kow-tow to jews like the GOP does, so if I want less jewish influence in politics, I should go with the Democrats, not the Republicans. <<
The GOP might be more obvious about it, but mainly because the Democrats don’t need to kowtow to Jews (or Negroes). They just don’t need to.
Somebody is going to organize the vans and buses to the polls to vote for the Democrats, and afterwards theys gonna be wings and malt liquor at the hall. Thank God, Almighty. Free at Last!
So I think this is a cope. I assume that you live in a hard-Blue state anyway. I can sympathize.
>> Your whole digression into ‘Palestine’ has nothing to do with anything I’ve said. <<
Sorry, I am talking past you a bit. This is the position of the TRS radio network. I still support them with a subscription because they occasionally throw in some Holocaust Denials in their podcasts, and Mike Enoch has been reading many Revisionist books and educating himself. He has interviewed Germar Rudolf on his show more than once. I also support them because they are an overtly White business and say so. I don’t have to be agreed with on everything. And I don’t have all the answers.
What I will say is that in my observation of Gaza protestors on campus, they are just the same BLM and Antifa lesbos and richard-smokers that we saw during the canonization ceremonies (riots) for Saint George Floyd. Their demands to the Universities and others were even the same as before ─ defund the police and so on. And there were even activists wearing Israeli flags “policing” to insure that the pro-Palestinian protestors kept it Kosher. A call for an Israeli defeat in Gaza is a call for Genocide, and the Arizona Governor and the ASU President agreed. To their credit, they did disperse the protest camps for violating the rules, and the protesters had been stridently harassing students trying to get their Finals over with.
In any case, the Jews will get their Gaza ceasefire when they want it and not a moment before.
>> The issue in my mind is whether Trump deserves the White Nationalist Vote and I say ‘No, he does not’. <<
Probably not. I am not sure that anybody has “deserved it” since General Washington.
But having a broken-down burro is still better than humping one’s gear across the pass on foot. And with a President Harris, Whitey is getting thumbtacks put into his hiking shoes to boot.
>> Concerned Whites need to realize that White interests are not advanced by either party and vote accordingly. <<
How is this news except to the most uninformed?
>> I’ve voted for many decades and what I’ve noticed is that in areas of immigration, inflation, trade, industrial policy, affirmative action, and nothing changed no matter who I voted for President.
>> Eventually, I came to the conclusion that there is no ‘two party system’, there is only one party with two flavors (both toxic).
>> I’m not cynical. I’ve just let the world educate me on how this ‘Presidential election’ thing actually works.
>> When you vote in the GOP, the GOP passes laws that would never have passed under the DNC.
>> When you vote in the DNC, the DNC passes laws that would never have passed under the GOP. <<
I am not disagreeing with you on that, unless you don’t think that a Harris-Walz administration will in any case be worse.
>> Reagan passed the largest amnesty for illegal aliens in American history. Was he a Democrat? <<
Actually he was. Reagan became GOP mainly because he did not like paying high income taxes when he finally made it as a bankable Hollywood actor. (In those days the progressive income tax rates rates could be very high, so a flash-in-the-pan actor with long spells between well-paying gigs would be hit hard.) And being twice the President of the Screen Actors Guild in the 1940s and ’50s, Reagan had a healthy disregard for Communism, which is not usually said of Democrats.
I voted for Ronnie in 1980 because I was very angry with Mr. Peanut, who should have punished Iran harder for taking U.S. embassy hostages, and Carter also recognized Red China in 1979 and began the process of hardcore free-trade and American deindustrialization ─ although for which Reagan proved later to be an even more ardent Neoliberal disciple of.
Reagan was a huge disappointment! I never liked his doctrine that the Gubbamint was the source of all problems and that privatization and trickle-down was the one-true way of the Lord.
I voted for the Populist candidate in 1984 as a protest vote, a pole vaulter in the 1952 Olympics named Bob Richards who was one of the first athletes to be put onto a box of Wheaties breakfast cereal (and unlike Bruce Jenner, Richards did not go on to mutilate his genitals). Yes, I voted for a pole vaulter ─ it was that hopeless. But it would not have mattered anyway since I was voting in a hard-Red state.
Jimmy Carter was a decent enough Born Again Christian, and his deficit spending at around 100 billion dollars annually was still manageable.
Under Reagan, the national debt exploded out of control, and his trying to build a 600-ship Navy was pure Neoconservative insanity, although I think that the SDI research was valuable. The Nazis were basically Keynesian economists at heart and this has some merit for consideration. I am not a fiscal hawk like most GOP cucks. We can fix our economic and banking problems.
What really killed it for me was Reagan sending Marines to Lebanon as sitting ducks to focus attention away from Israeli shenanigans. I was still in the Army at that time, just about to be minted an NCO, and I don’t like to see troops put into harms way for nothing.
I also did not appreciate Ronnie’s open season on the air traffic controllers Union in 1981 ─ and the spate of Right-to-Work laws that came after that. In my experience, the NLRB talks the talk but can’t walk the walk. I used to be a television engineer and an IBEW Union steward. I almost went into Labor Law after that, but I realized that the problems of deindustrialization, Globalization, immigration, and race-mixing were not going to be solved by getting more Republicans to sign Union cards. And it was obvious that the pro-Labor Democrats were overtly very anti-White, especially when more Darkies were replacing the old-school Catholics, whom I learned very much from.
I think it is good to have WN debates on strategy and tactics. Much is learned. I do not have all the answers.
🙂
If people on our side are supporting Trump hoping that we might get a seat-at-the-table in the GOP or the conservative movement, those people are probably wrong, I agree. And besides, that would only dumb-down our message and compromise our long-term chances anyways. Wallace is wrong about all that. We have to go our own path separate from the mainstream, but that doesn’t mean who holds office makes no difference to our interests. And on the narrow question of who should get our vote, Wallace is right.
As White nationalists, we are something like unofficial outlaws in this country, and so our basic civil rights are always at risk. So for us the only question each presidential election is how will a win for either side effect those civil rights—what kind of judges will the administration appoint, who will staff the justice department, etc.? Obviously then, Trump is the better choice, and it’s not even close.
Thanks for the reply, Scott.
I hope Trump takes this [near assassination] to heart and really means what he says and will therefore do something decent with Immigration.
I don’t put any stock in ‘a miracle on live TV’ having happened. Has Donald Trump evidenced any change from his alleged near-death experience? Here’s what Anglin writes:
Donald Trump’s first appearance after the alleged “assassination attempt” was appearing for a speech by a pro-abortion, pro-gay, used-up old hooker with a face tattoo who is into satanism.
The ‘lesser of two evils’ doesn’t extend to Trump on the issue of sending White men to fight Iran– behind which are Russia and Iran– on behalf of Israel. Trump is serious in greenlighting Israel to “finish the job”. If you read an objection to that as taking a pro-Palestinian stance, you should know the Israelis plan to “finish the job” under cover of war with Iran. The kayfabe in Butler has worked to utterly bamboozle people into supporting Trump, especially on this point.
That’s why the first words out of JD Vance’s mouth at the RNC was nothing to do with the southern border, or mass repatriation of illegals or rejecting wholesale displacement of the White middle class with H1B Visa Indians and Chinese. You know, “It’s immigration, stupid.” Nope. JD Vance’s first articulation of his ticket’s intentions was their readiness and willingness to “bomb Iran”.
People need to get wise as to what is genuinely pro-White, instead of being manipulated by short-sighted notions about left or right.
Thanks. I don’t have a very high regard for Anglin and don’t think there is a heightened danger of war with Iran. I agree that this kind of rhetoric is off-track but it is an election year and candidates say stuff. I don’t believe that the Butler bullet miss was divine intervention any more than the JFK hit was divine intervention.
I have been to a few Trump rallies over the years and the people who go to them are nice White people (nary a Darkie) who will a bit sheepishly tell you if you press, that Trump being the only person who counter-signals the Illegal invasion, moves their heart. They are terrified of being called Rayciss because that is their programing from birth.
Trump is making it acceptable again to question some things that have always needed to be questioned.
Personally, I would want to end legal immigration for the most part as well, but baby steps are better than no steps. A few years ago nobody on the streets had ever heard of H1B visas, and many still find it baffling. I usually ask them how often they have called a call center for a problem with their bank account, or gone to a doctor’s office, and gotten a Pajeet whose Subcontinental accent was undecipherable. This is the Service Economy that Mr. Carter and Mr. Reagan and friends were touting as being the neatest future possible some decades ago.
Well, H1Bs bring them into our country to work. Most of the foreign students are sponsored by the Big Tech firms too. Furthermore, the (basically all of them, Marxist) Universities today have a new economic model ─ the “New American University” ─ where they can make more money educating Indians and Chinese than Americans, who usually have to take out exorbitant student loans and will likely end up working for Starbucks and calling out loudly to defund the police.
Biden did good by cancelling a lot of student loans. This is a horrible racket that needs to end.
The foreign graduates, however, have been either fast-tracked for U.S. Citizenship or they go back to the Subcontinent or Indonesia to manage industries like silicon microchip fabrication that used to be American. There are some chip plants in the Phoenix metropolitan area like Motorola and Intel, etc., but they are mostly for demonstration purposes and fab training.
My Uncle was an aerospace engineer and computer programer working in the office at the Motorola headquarters in the mid-1990s, and I went to pick him up after work one day to go dining. I got there a little early to avoid the rush-hour traffic, and while I waited I was appalled that the entire place leaving at quitting time was speaking Hindi. Some of them are good people.
I am not shilling for Trump, and I really don’t like Vance and his extended family of snake-charmers, but Harris-Walz will be unbearable ─ and I hope that this does not happen. Also, again, having fewer Communist judges appointed to the bench is always better.
🙂
This is a naive perspective. No matter who wins censorship will increase.
Will censorship always increase?
Greg Johnson: August 16, 2024 Will censorship always increase?
—
It can and will be considerably decreased, when it is we who are doing the censoring, seeking a consensus of racially loyalty among our own.
Unlimited so-called “free speech” has been a disaster with allowing our enemies and their apologists among our councils, spreading doubt and confusion, especially on the internet. It is a harebrained, built-in self-destruction mechanism. Look at the “Christ is King” GAB free speech platform with it large “Christianity equals White Genocide” sub-forum. How’s that working out?
Trump/Vance, despite their many negatives, will buy a little time and be better than the ((Emhoff)))/Walz clown act, but we will not vote our way out of the Judaized mess. The country will remain divided 50/50 as long as Jews rule the electoral process and control America’s mass mind through their news and entertainment media stranglehold.
—
Lord Shang: August 15, 2024 I am not Jewish (though I have many Jewish friends)…
Get your priorities right, white [sic] man!
—
Hear! hear!, White man. It’s what our priorities are when we get right down to what White racial preservation is all about.
I’m unburdened by having any Jewish friends and am somewhat bewildered that the #2 man on C-C’s Top 100 Commenters has many.
I genuinely hate to have to admit this, but some of the most based, racially solid men I know are Jews. I’ve read the brilliant Kevin MacDonald, of course, and laud his work to the limit. But in my experience, I’ve noticed that, with the exception of the ethnically manipulative, faux-conservative neocons, the (ideologically, not religiously) conservative Jews of my acquaintance tend to be much more race-realistically oriented than many of the Gentile conservatives I know. This might be because Jews are simply more ethnonationalist than Eurogentiles in general, and thus the more rightwing ones who identify with whites also tend to focus their opinions and activism on what we would consider the correct issues, like immigration, controlling black crime, DEI, gun rights, etc, while caring little about abortion rights, school choice, whether the US is defending a “rules-based international order”, etc.
Lord Shang: August 18, 2024 I genuinely hate to have to admit this, but some of the most based, racially solid men I know are Jews… [C]onservative Jews of my acquaintance tend to be much more race-realistically oriented than many of the Gentile conservatives I know… and thus the more rightwing ones who identify with whites [sic] also tend to focus their opinions and activism on what we would consider the correct issues…
—
Our struggle is racial — neither conservative nor right-wing — Lord. For serious biological race-thinkers, this eternal racial struggle is best defined as Aryan vs. Jew.
That you hate to admit your Judeophilia, albeit limited to conservative or right-wing Yids, in this nominally pro-White platform, is revealing — disreputable in my radical opinion since you attempt to influence C-C readers in the wrong direction.
This admission by you makes you ineligible for National Alliance membership since applicants must come through me to be approved. We’ll leave the door cracked should you become more intelligent, ditch your Jew friends and develop new friendships among serious pro-Whites who are not so quick to compromise on what is important.
Joe Biden has signed a bill to force the sale of TikTok because there was too much criticism of Israel on social media
TikTok was created with the support of Red Chinese Intelligence service and is used by the Maoist regime in Bejing to get informations and to manipulate people. It should be forbidden everywhere in the world abroad of the PRC.
To repeat a trope of radical politics: a prerequisite for an upstart movement seizing power is division among the ruling elites.
Whatever Trump’s motivations may be, he is widely seen as a threat to “Our Democracy” by much of the technocratic-oligarchic-deep-state regime. And while the attentions of the hostile elites are diverted to bringing down Trump, the infighting gives the Dissident Right room to maneuver if (big IF) the Dissident Right develops the correct strategy.
Thing is, there are factions within the regime which are contending for power. It just may be that the Dissident Right can cut a deal with one of these factions and carve out a base for operations. That can be translated into funding ($), access to IT platforms, legal defense, invites to big name conferences, and perhaps a seat or two at the table of power.
This will not happen if the Dissident Right gets into blackpilled doom spiraling, or sits out election cycles munching popcorn waiting for “our guy” to ride in on a white horse.
Might also note that the MAGA movement is capable of putting activists into the street. Thousands of activists over a span of years. No other movement to the right in America seems to be capable of such militancy these decadent days. Many of these people are open to White Nationalist politics, but that will not happen if their avatar (Trump) is being bashed on a daily basis by the Dissident Right.
To give one example: push the meme that the same lawfare tactics which are being deployed against Trump and the J6 folks are the same as the ones being deployed against the Dissident Right. So how about an alliance against the common foe in the regime?
It’s not what Trump will do once in office. It is what the Dissident Right can do, right now.
If you want Trump to win the election, then convince him to renounce his Israel-first foreign policy and instead adopt an America First foreign policy.
To win the presidency, Trump will need to win the Midwestern swing states. To win the Midwestern swing states, Trump needs the Uncommitted voters to stay home, vote 3rd party, or even vote for him.
It is impossible to overstate the importance of the Gaza genocide as a wedge issue. Biden’s 2020 voters are massively dissatisfied with his administration’s unconditional support for Israel. Many Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, progressives and young people are willing to be one-issue voters this year. More importantly, given a choice between a warmonger and a decisive peace candidate, Midwestern centrists always vote for the decisive peace candidate. Look at how good Obama did in 2008 in the Midwest, running as the peace candidate against warmonger John McCain. Look at how good Trump did in 2016 in the Midwest, running as a peace candidate against warmonger Hillary Clinton.
If Trump continues to run as an ultra-Zionist warmonger, he will certainly lose Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. He might even lose Indiana, Iowa and Ohio, just like John McCain did in 2008.
This will happen no matter how White nationalists vote. We are not the swing vote. Midwestern centrists and Uncommitted voters are the swing vote. Our most urgent task is to get Trump’s campaign to adopt a true America First foreign policy – for his own sake, and for ours.
and his trying to build a 600-ship Navy was pure Neoconservative insanity
It has given many jobs and salaries to White American workers.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.