Ten Questions for the Left

2,583 words

Enough people on the real right demonize people on the left. Some see the comprehensive left-Cathedral conspiracy (a conspiracy of universities, media, corporations, and high politics). Some people describe a leftist “long march through the institutions” to explain the cultural dominance of the left in real politics. But a lot of things on the left work because of interpersonal relationships, shared ideology, idealism, but also lack of self-awareness, cowardice, psychological problems, psychological blackmail, fear, and the desire for profit.

What I Like on the Left

The DIY – (Do IT Yourself) principle means that the left-wing creates everything themselves, interviews the bands, gets photos, makes graphics and art collages, and publishes a zine and then sells the zine themselves at concerts, or exchanges it for other zines or CDs, t-shirts, etc. It works the same way with bands – bands record their CDs themselves without expensive record companies and make their own logos and album covers. Bands often play benefit concerts for left-wing causes and often play exchange concerts, so they get to know new places for free and make a profit for other bands. The audience then has a great choice of bands from all over the world, a small club or band just needs to join this already existing left-wing music web.

The left also organizes its own concerts (punk, hardcore – HC, hip hop, avant-garde music, house parties) and often there is an intellectual dimension to these concerts (lectures on the present or affirmation of one’s own philosophical fetishism, i.e. affirmation of things that are taboo and must not be criticised – I will explain below). The DIY principle is very useful for the left because 1. It develops the left’s abilities to do everything themselves, without depending on the system. 2. It keeps money inside the left. DIY is often imperfect, but authentic. And authentic things are simply missing in the modern artificial world of mass production and consumerism.

Imagination. Another world is possible. The left can imagine a completely different world without capitalism, without rich and poor, a world where ideally everyone has opportunity. And that is especially attractive to idealists, moral people, but also to poor students with college loans and young people without a home of their own. It’s usually more attractive to young people than the old Jordan Peterson moralizing. The actions of the left are very cheap, so even the poorest students who have no money for culture can afford these actions. But this world is less attractive to white exploited workers with no future – neither woke corporations nor the left want them, which is why these people often vote for national populist parties. These people often work without a contract, as part-timers, or work more than 8 hours, with no hope of improving their situation. The left hates poor white people and does not bring solutions for these people, it just brings more problems for them.

Non-financial motivation. The left wants to live outside capitalism and used to have a lot of idealists within it. These people have organized benefits (for dog shelters, imprisoned leftists, support for squats), protests (against animal abuse, against racism, against war, against government and current issues), workshops (on dark web, computer crypto, cycling in the city, baking), non-commercial events – (bazaars , fixing things). The left has also managed to set up various non-political NGO’s that influence lived reality more than real political parties – Food not Bombs (giving vegan food to the people who need it and providing food for their events), Antifa (intimidating and monitoring political opponents), organizations for the homeless and their integration, organizing language courses for ethnic minorities. Unfortunately, the left has not been able to resist corporate libtardism. And corporate libtards are anything but idealistic. These people act purely out of cowardice and want power and money, and while libtards are anti-hate in their proclamations, they are the most hateful group of people I know. They are far more hateful than neo-Nazis. The left and the corporate libtards today have the same fetishistic philosophy.

Intellectual research. Previously, leading intellectuals belonged to the left (Noam Chomsky, Slavoj Žižek, Bernard-Henri Lévy, Jacques Lacan). And at events of the left, it was possible to discuss these thinkers with intellectuals or attend lectures for reflection. Some of the lectures were indeed intellectually stimulating. The left can criticize capitalism well and rightly. But there are taboos in leftist intellectual inquiry that the left will not or cannot answer, or will censor out of the discussion.

Catching young disaffected people. The left used to be a master of catching young disaffected people through its actions and through its presence. Only young ignorant people can be satisfied with the state of the world today. A young dissatisfied person is very happy to reach for the first revolt that is offered to him. And the most effective way to sell revolt was, until recently, to the left. That’s also why so many young people have supported the idealistic left, and in time these young people will either go into the woke corporation or leave the left definitively.

Non-political politics. The left can make even non-political things and everyday little activism a part of politics and lifestyle. To give a few examples: a vegan restaurant, a concert, an exhibition, a dinner party, fashion (subcultural, slow fashion, fashion without real leather). A leftist thus enters the style and already lives the left through life actions and connects his whole life with the left. This non-political politics is also practiced very successfully by CasaPound Italia (CPI). Gesamtkunstwerk includes all arts. Gesamleben includes all actions, thinking, values and all things in life that infiltrate the political style.

Reward for moral behavior. If you have the right views and behavior, you can enjoy all the benefits of the left and feel good about yourself and others perceive you as a good person. The left generally considers its supporters to be good people, although there is of course resentment about the various factions and money grabbing.

What I Don’t Like About the Left

Philosophical fetishism. “Racism”, “sexism”, “homophobia”. The left uses several pejorative words in the abstract, and thanks to the fact that there is no definition of who is a racist, sexist, or homophobe, anyone can be labeled as such. Even a newborn baby is a racist according to the left because it prefers people of its own appearance to strangers. These labels from the left are like hereditary guilt in Christianity, which the left is so fond of criticizing. Those who are born white and want to preserve their ethnicity automatically suffer from hereditary guilt. If the left were to define its labels precisely, it would lose the ability to label all its opponents and the ability to bully politicians who do not share the left’s taboos. The left is intellectually dishonest about this.

No high art. Within the Left, one cannot create high art and worship beauty, such as we find in Art Nouveau and architecture, or in Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. The left either uses pure modern design at best, and at worst downright ugliness. In its deconstruction of art and civilization, the left despises beauty and even classical music. In the left’s egalitarian world, things that are above average and beautiful are undesirable. Leftist sculpture must be iconoclastic, anti-civilizing, ugly, or it must celebrate a defect. Left-wing bands often use the symbol of a crossed-out note to let the listener know that it is not music – this can often be found in Grindcore. Grindcore is a mixture of garbage sounds of under-tuned guitars and instead of singing, it’s various farts, burps, blitzes and grunts. The left also likes to destroy various monuments that don’t suit their historical world view. You can’t create high art within the left and be a cultural elite there.

No place for healthy white men. The left offers no place for healthy, strong, heterosexual men. When it talks about white men, it talks about patriarchy, cis-normativity, and white privilege. The white heterosexual male is the main enemy of the left today, and it bothers them more than capitalism and the housing shortage. In the old days, the left defended the interests of white heterosexual workers but today it openly hates these people and does everything against them.

The need to constantly apologize. The left has a constant need to mentally blackmail its people. Either their people are guilty – of their carbon footprint, of having white skin, of the colonialism of their ancestors, of white privilege, or of being male, or guilty of their heterosexual orientation, or guilty of bringing children into the world. This is a very toxic mindset, and I’m not surprised that most leftists have mental problems. Although as I will say below, mental problems are very welcome on the left.

It doesn’t criticize ideas, it criticizes people. The left doesn’t criticize specific statements made by specific people, it criticizes and often misrepresents thinkers and politicians. The left invents stories and opinions of persons, but does not give specific persons any media space to defend themselves. Within the framework of free speech, the left will never stand up for its opponent. Freedom of speech does not apply to the left’s opponents. Some people uncomfortable with the left have the current status of the devil. I.e., cancelled bank accounts, cancelled all social media accounts, doxxing, reporting a person, threatening the owner of a rented home, calling an employer and demanding an employee be fired for his or her opinions, making Google searches less convenient, digital book burning, cancelling book sales through online distribution channels (Amazon, Barnes & Noble), banning people from speaking out and talking about issues in the mainstream media. This is bullying. David Duke has experienced all of it. David Duke is not allowed to sell his books has Amazon, but any liar can write a book about him and sell it on Amazon. An anti-white racist film BlackKKKlansman was made about a small incident in David Duke’s life, but all social media sites are deleting David Duke’s reaction to the film. So any fool can comment on David Duke, but he has to keep quiet about himself. Varg Vikernes’ YouTube channel ThuleanMysteries was shut down, but at the same time, a lying movie about him, Lords of Chaos, was made with worldwide distribution. Any fool can comment on Varg, but he himself must remain silent about his history and thoughts. The original founder of the RAF, Horst Mahler, is still alive in Germany, and there is a great film about him and the founders of the RAF, Baader-Mainhof Komplex, but Horst Mahler is censored everywhere and cannot comment on anything. The corporate cowardly left wants to make rebel films about non-conformists, but they don’t give any space to the rebels the film is about, even though the film supposedly describes their lives. This is stunningly perverse. The corporate censor left is stealing souls! The left doesn’t just ban ideas, it bans specific people. No person with personal integrity who knows about this problem can participate in this.

Vegan fetishism. The left has a vegan fetishism and will never acknowledge the arguments of omnivores. The left is leading us to the collapse of the entire agricultural sector with this approach because it says it is fighting against large-scale farms, but in fact it is banning animal production on small farms. That is why the farm protest movement has arisen in The Netherlands, France, and many other parts of Europe. The left does not understand that livestock and crop production are connected vessels, that one without the other is destructive to small farmers. The farmer needs to rotate crops, he needs cheap animal fertiliser, he needs to maintain the cycle of crops, he needs meat and animal products.

Picking up psychological and sexual defects. The left is very fond of picking up the psychological and sexual defects of its supporters. These people not only have to be tolerated, but they are promoted precisely because of these defects. At the request of a friend, I quietly attended a leftist party where leftists talked about themselves, their mental illnesses and sexual orientations. Whoever had the most of everything won. But unfortunately it works the same way with the placement of people in the leadership of the military, corporations, and state institutions. Such people win public contracts, etc. If it wasn’t sad, it would be very funny.

The left has several taboos. Things you can’t even ask about, which is why I’ve prepared the most controversial questions for the left.

Questions

Is it possible to criticize Jewish influence on the left and Jews as an ethnic group that promotes its ethnic interests at the costs of others through concrete actions? Or can Jews only be criticized for racism and can one only criticize the militaristic state of Israel?

Should the left promote cooperation between nations and peace? Or is the left to advocate that we move all people into one state and forbid any criticism of this phenomenon from the side of the original inhabitants and label them as racists and finance such a project from the taxes of the original population?

Why can’t the left define racism? Can there be black racism? Why does the left only rage against white racism? Why is the Good Night White Pride campaign only against white pride? Why does white pride matter but black, yellow, LGBT pride is encouraged? For the hypocrisy of the left, I recommend reading the Wikipedia entries on white pride, black pride, yellow pride, and LGBT pride.

Why does everyone have a right to an identity but whites don’t?

Does the left demand secularism in Islam or other religions such as Hinduism or Jainism? Can there be a non-authoritarian spirituality for the left – Wicca, magic, meditation, Buddhism? And does the left need such a spirituality and spiritual purpose or meaning? Or is the left only allowed to want secularism in whites and in Christianity?

Should we be allowed to criticize the hypocrisy of the left? Or is it better to ban all criticism, because the left would collapse due to its internal contradictions. Does the left need critical and thoughtful people or philosophical fetishists who don’t think and don’t ask questions?

Should there be freedom of creation and freedom to truthfully describe reality within the framework of the left? If I want to write a truthful article about how African immigrants murdered, abused and ate Pamela Mastropietro, I can do that. If a leftist writes such an article, even if he softens the gruesome details, his media won’t publish it and he will lose his job and be despised by the left. The same goes for all leftist underground zines. Only obligatory narratives can be published: the poor migrant hated and despised by racist white society. But it is no longer possible to describe Sunday’s experience at a public swimming pool in Germany – mobs of Pakistanis sexually harassed underage girls and beat up a lifeguard. This no longer fits into the left-wing narrative and cannot be written about.

Is a left that takes the same positions as most capitalist corporations the solution to the problem, or is it part of the problem itself?

Is the left supposed to represent working white conservative people with families? Or to refer to these people as white trash while wanting their votes?

What does the left get out of representing exclusively anti-civilization values? Why does the left promote anti-white racism, sexual perversion, repulsive art, and bullying of normal people who pay taxes and create civilization?