Print this post Print this post

White Genocide

RaceMixing2,239 words

Translations: FrenchGerman, SlovakSpanish

White Nationalists are united in the belief that our race is threatened with simple biological extinction. This is often dismissed as alarmism, but, as I have shown, one can make a very simple and compelling argument that whites will go extinct if present trends continue. The purpose of White Nationalism is to interrupt those trends.

Some White Nationalists go one step further, arguing that our race is being intentionally driven to extinction, i.e., that whites are the targets of genocide. This claim too is dismissed as not just alarmist but crazy. Nevertheless, I shall argue that white genocide is actually happening. There are people in positions of power who are promoting policies that they know will lead to the extinction of the white race. Unless, of course, we stop them.

To establish the white genocide thesis, we must do three things. First, we need to define genocide in a way that is consistent with a slow process leading ultimately to extinction. Second, we need to show that white extinction is not a mysterious force of nature but the result of human choices and actions. Third, we need to show that white extinction is not just an unforeseen, unintended consequence of these policies, but rather their deliberate, intentional effect.

It seems counter-intuitive to claim that whites are the victims of genocide. Whites are not being slaughtered by the millions, which is the image that most people have of genocide. To all appearances, our race is powerful, prosperous, and populous. But defenders of the White Genocide thesis point to the 1948 United Nations Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which in Article II defines genocide as

. . . any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; . . .

This definition of genocide is much broader than outright mass murder. In particular, points (c) and (d) are consistent with characterizing policies that destroy a group slowly, over long periods of time, as genocidal as well. So genocide comes in two forms, which we can call fast, hot genocide and slow, cold genocide. White extinction falls into the latter category.

White extinction means that in every white nation, reproduction rates have fallen below replacement, which means that more whites will die than are being born, until whites cease to exist as a distinct race.

There are five principal causes of white extinction. I am sure that other factors could be added to this list, but if just these five problems were addressed, I would no longer fear for the future of our race.

  • An ethic of hedonism, individualism, and selfishness that denigrates reproduction and family life;
  • Feminism, which encourages women to pursue careers instead of making family life their primary occupation;
  • The widespread use of birth control and abortion to decouple sex from pregnancy and pregnancy from child-rearing;
  • The rising costs of family formation, chiefly caused by racial integration—which is the driving force behind suburbanization and ex-urbanization in order to find safe spaces for whites to raise families—and by non-white immigration and offshoring industry, which lower wages for whites;
  • Miscegenation, in which individuals reproduce their own genes but not their race by mixing with another race.

These factors are not blind forces of nature, like an asteroid colliding with earth. They were all created by human beings. Some of them, like feminism, birth control pills, legalized abortion, and overturning racial segregation, immigration restrictions, and bans on miscegenation are quite recent. They were hatched in the minds of intellectuals, artists, scientists, politicians, educators, and advertisers. They were made real by changing people’s beliefs and values, and by altering the laws and institutions that govern us.

But all of these things could be changed. People could be taught to value family life over selfishness, hedonism, and careerism; feminism could be discouraged; access to birth control and abortion could be restricted; laws could be changed to make family formation affordable; racial separation, immigration restriction, and economic nationalism could become policy again; miscegenation could be outlawed. Indeed, White Nationalists support just such policies to halt white extinction.

But to establish the white genocide thesis, we must show that white extinction is the intended result of the policies we oppose. The first three causes of white extinction are simply products of the pursuit of individual freedom. The last two are products of individual freedom and racial egalitarianism. So isn’t it possible that white extinction is just the unintended consequence of individualism and racial egalitarianism?

Of course it is possible, and in many cases, it is true. The majority of people who advocate individualism and racial egalitarianism are simply unaware that these values are promoting the ongoing extinction of the white race. Our job is to inform them.

But when such people are informed, their reactions fall into several categories. Some will simply refuse to accept that white extinction is taking place. Of those who accept that white extinction is actually happening, some will wish to stop it, and others will not. Of the latter, some will simply not care, and others will actually cheer the process on.

There is, however, a difference between people who might sign on to policies promoting white genocide after the fact and those who might conceive and execute such policies before the fact and with full awareness of their consequences. What evidence is there that such people exist?

First, the burden of proof needs to be shifted. For is it really plausible that the leaders of dozens of white nations have adopted similar policies antithetical to the long-term survival of their own peoples, yet none of them knew what they are doing?

Yes, it is fashionable to deride politicians for thinking only in terms of the next election. But that is not really true. Politicians are, for instance, rather far-sighted when it comes to their personal career ambitions and plans. Beyond that, our ruling elites do not consist simply of democratic politicians. Moreover, the ruling elites in every form of society are noted for thinking and planning ahead. Both government intelligence agencies and private think tanks are in the business of generating long-term predictions based on current trends, and planning accordingly. Thus it is just not plausible that our leaders are unaware of white extinction. They either don’t care about it, or they want it to happen.

Second, it is no longer controversial that Jews are massively overrepresented among Western elites in politics, the media, business, academia, and the professions. Jews are, moreover, among the principal promoters of trends conducive to white genocide, for example: non-white immigration, racial integration, miscegenation, feminism, and sexual liberation. Of course any attempt to blame Jews for white genocide can be hijacked into hairsplitting about historical causation. From a practical point of view, however, it is more important—and less controversial—to note that the organized Jewish community is the linchpin of opposition to nationalist, especially racial nationalist, attempts to rectify these problems going forward. How we got here is ultimately less important than how we can save ourselves. And Jews are blocking the exit.

Now, is it really plausible that the leaders of the Jewish community “know not what they do”? Jews, after all, are the people most aware of the conditions that promote or prevent genocide. Thus Jews support the existence of a Jewish state, Israel, as a refuge from genocide. Yet they oppose any attempt to preserve white homelands for white peoples. Israel is for Jews, but Poland, Sweden, Germany, France, and so forth are for everyone. Jews see intermarriage as a threat to Jewish survival, but they promote miscegenation for other groups and oppose anyone who would ban it. Jews recognize that a strong sense of Jewish identity, including pride in their history and achievements, is necessary for Jewish survival, but they promote multiculturalism and white guilt for the rest of us.

Now, not all Jews promote destructive ideas merely for the goyim while exempting themselves. Jews may promote intermarriage for others, but they practice it as well and at higher rates than other groups. Jews promote feminism to others, but the primary victims of Jewish feminism are the Jewish men who marry these harridans, while other Jewish men marry out to avoid them. Jews promote an ethos of selfishness, individualism, and materialism to others. But they practice it as well, which is one reason why secular Jews have very low reproduction rates.

In short, many Jews don’t just preach nihilism, they practice it as well. Unfortunately, because Jews are so influential, they have the power to drag us along in their wake. They are the vanguard of nihilism. They are not hypocrites, preaching nihilism for thee but not for me. But that makes them even more evil, because hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue, and they don’t care enough to even offer lip service.

But while some Jews are leading us into extinction, others are goading us from behind but have no intention of sharing in our fate. These are the Jews who praise multiculturalism, open borders, and miscegenation for us, but prefer to opt out because they know that such policies would lead to their extinction.

They aren’t just being “inconsistent” about principles. They are being perfectly consistent with their real principle of collective self-interest. They are not upholding “double standards,” because their single standard is collective self-interest. These Jews have a live and let die philosophy. They seek to profit from our destruction as a people, and they not only promote our decline but actively suppress our resistance to it.

Aside from Jews that are actively pushing and pulling us toward our destruction, there are surely some who are doing neither. Some simply lack the power to do us harm, even if they might want to. Others are entirely ignorant of what their leaders are doing. But one category is conspicuous by its near absence: righteous Jews, i.e., Jews who know white genocide is taking place, who understand their people’s role in it, and who have warned whites and worked to stop it. That relative silence is actually more damning than the never-ending din of anti-white hatred emanating from the Jewish community.

In short, we know that white genocide is happening, because Jews in high places, with the power to promote or prevent white genocide, cannot be unaware of what is happening, yet they do nothing to stop it and everything to stop us from stopping it.

The third and most compelling piece of evidence for white genocide is that people actually say that they support it. The only people who say outright that whites should be exterminated are marginal cranks, like Dr. Kamau Kambon, a sometime Black Studies professor and the owner of Blacknificent Books, who declared, “We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet.”

The subtler advocates of white genocide, like Noel Ignatiev, a Jewish Harvard Ph.D. and the editor of the journal Race Traitor (subtitled Treason to Whiteness is Loyalty to Humanity), speak of “deconstructing” the “concept” of whiteness, which sounds like a harmless language game until you grasp that they think race just is a social construct.

MiscegenationalismBut the most common advocates of white genocide simply promote race-mixing as a solution to racism. They tacitly agree with White Nationalists that racial diversity within the same system leads to strife, so to eliminate strife, they promote miscegenation to create a homogeneous mongrel race. The most influential advocate of what I call “miscegenationalism” was European unity pioneer Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, who was himself of mixed race (his father was white, his mother Japanese). In his book Practical Idealism, he declared:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

Interestingly enough, Coudenhove-Kalergi did not envision the disappearance of the Jewish people but instead expected them to be the ruling elite of a miscegenated world. (He himself was not Jewish.)

Why is it important to establish that white extinction is actually white genocide? It is easy to understand why people might shy away from such a truth, for it implies that whites are not just the victims of a ghastly mistake, or an impersonal sociopolitical “system,” or an inhuman cosmic or historical destiny, but of knowing malice—of principled enmity—of diabolical evil. It is hard to accept that such evil exists, much less that it wills our annihilation.

But if we are to save ourselves, we have to understand the forces that are arrayed against us. We need to know that our attempts to raise people’s consciousness and win their allegiance will eventually come up against not just ignorance and indifference but diamond hard malice. Eventually we will make all the friends that we can make, persuade all the people we can persuade, and only enemies will remain—enemies that cannot be converted but must simply be defeated.



  1. Posted September 15, 2015 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    Great piece, thank you!

  2. Eosos
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    We could draw parallels from miscegenation to degenerated masonic thoughts that basically strive to achieve “oneness” that is their vision of God. Everything has to be the same, one, universal.
    From “E pluribus unum”(Out of many, one), communism, globalisation, egalitarianism, atheism to miscegenation.

    The world they are trying to create sounds horribly bland and depressing.

  3. Peter Quint
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    One of your finer pieces of writing, a good conclusion is necessary to drive home the argument and leave an indelible mark in the mind. This conclusion is one of the best I have read in a long time;
    “Eventually we will make all the friends that we can make, persuade all the people we can persuade, and only enemies will remain—enemies that cannot be converted but must simply be defeated.”
    I have long believed that ours will be a minority movement, this is how many whites are in America, keep in mind I found this on Wikipedia so I cannot verify how accurate it is.
    “Whites (including Hispanics who identified as White) constitute the majority, with a total of about 245,532,000, or 77.7% of the population as of 2013. Non-Hispanic Whites totaled about 197,816,000, or 62.6% of the U.S. population.”
    A minority movement out of 197,816,000 is still going to be several million; I hope at least 10,000,000. If we could just establish our own ecological niches that have not been corrupted by Christianity. When I was in the army I injudiciously told a captain that whites were going to be a minority in America one day. The captain thought about it for a second and replied, “Yes, but we will be a powerful minority.” I do not understand this type of thought processes, one should never want to be in a racial minority. That is what 2,000 or christian corruption can do to a race.

  4. Posted September 15, 2015 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Curiously, Evola met with Coudenhove-Kalergi in 1933, and even interviewed him for an article, which is included in Arktos’ forthcoming volume, “A Traditionalist Confronts Fascism.” C-K was actually quite positive towards Italian Fascism, which he saw as something that could be extended over all of Europe in order to bring about European unity. Nothing about C-Ks racial views or attitude toward the Jews is mentioned in it, however.

    • Jaego
      Posted September 15, 2015 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

      He had a huge Anti-Russian Communist persona that he used as a shield and open sesame. Probably he was like Soros, with any number of personas and ideologies that he could use to advance his real agenda.

  5. eyeslevel
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    The main cause of white genocide is mass non-white immigration coupled with forced assimilation in all white areas. Miscegenation is the natural result of these imposed policies which over time force-blend white people out of existence. Whites and ONLY whites are denied exclusive territory anywhere on the planet.

    • anon
      Posted September 15, 2015 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

      “The main cause of white genocide is mass non-white immigration coupled with forced assimilation in all white areas.”

      I’d actually say it’s not – at least not yet.

      What has actually been happening is localized ethnic cleansing. They dump a lot of immigrants in a settled area leading to conflict over housing, jobs and women. That conflict leads the parental age segment of the white population with school age children to move away – white flight – leaving the older population behind and a small chunk of the parents who for some reason couldn’t escape. The children of the families left behind got force assimilated but until now they have always been a minority – most parents could still afford to escape.

      This process is then repeated one neighborhood after the other so the majority of the white population don’t realize they are under collective attack.

      You could see this if you took a city and mapped the percentage of white children in the schools over time. You would see the ethnic cleansing visually spreading out from the starting locations.

      Eventually the white population will be herded into a smaller and smaller living space with no where to run. That’s when the forced assimilation or worse will occur.

      Although this is literally how it is being done it relies on knowing that the localized conflict driving it – especially sexual violence in and around the schools – is suppressed by the media. As time goes on the number of people who know this from experience is increasing but otherwise it is hard to prove that is the mechanism.

      (Understandable as if it was easy to prove the whole narrative would collapse.)

    • anon
      Posted September 16, 2015 at 4:00 am | Permalink

      actually on second thoughts my reply was a bit pedantic as it comes to the same thing in the end. as you say

      “Whites and ONLY whites are denied exclusive territory anywhere on the planet.”

  6. Robert Pinkerton
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    In my opinion (as one not Abrahamic in religion), the Jews are metaphorically “as if” the Gods’ heuristic example or classroom demonstration model of group survival. They appear to have perfected tribality as far as it can be perfected in this twenty-first century. If that is so, as I believe it is, then what is necessary is to study and analyse them in the farthest degree possible, then decide upon how to apply the lessons therefrom derived.

  7. Peter
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    The Jews’ claim to be world-rulers and their genocidal attitude to any who dare resist is clearly stated in their Bible.

    “Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee.” Genesis 27:29.

    “This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear report of thee, and shall tremble, and be in anguish because of thee.” Deuteronomy 2:25.

    “For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth.” Deuteronomy 7:6.

    “and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt rule over many nations, but they shall not rule over thee.” Deuteronomy 15:6.

    “the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth.” Deuteronomy 28:1.

    “And all the people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord; and they shall be afraid of thee.” 28:10.

    “And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only and not beneath.” 28:12f.

    “Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.” Psalm 2:1-3.

    “Ask of me and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.” Psalm 2:8ff.

    “for the Lord most high is terrible; he is a great King over all the earth. He shall subdue the people under us, and all the nations under our feet.” Psalm 47:2f.

    “For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles.” Psalm 54:3.

    “Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.” Psalm 82:8.

    “He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries.” Psalm 110:6.

    “Let the high praises of God be on their lips, and a two-edged sword in their hand; to wreak vengeance on the nations and to chastise the heathen: to load their kings with chains and put their nobles in irons; to execute the judgement decreed against them – this is the glory of all his faithful servants. O praise the Lord.” Psalm 149:6-9.

    “This is the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations.” Isaiah 14: 26-27.

    “For the indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and his fury upon all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered them to the slaughter. Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcases, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood.” Isaiah 34:2-3.

    “For it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompences for the controversy of Zion.” Isaiah 34:8.

    “that men may bring unto thee the forces of the gentiles, and that their kings may be brought. For the nation that shall not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.” Isaiah 60:11-16.

    “See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.”
    Jeremiah 1:10.

    “though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee.” Jeremiah 30:11.

    “For I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee.” Jeremiah 46:28.<

    “And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep: who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. Thine hand shall be lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all thine enemies shall be cut off.” Micah 5:8f.

  8. Franklin Ryckaert
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    The term “white genocide” is actually feared by the cultural Marxists because it can by no means be justified. Therefore we should use it all the time in our slogans : immigration is genocide, diversity is genocide, miscegenation is genocide.

    There are actually three forms of genocide :

    1) “hard” genocide by killing a group.
    2) “medium” genocide by sterilizing a group.
    3) “soft” genocide by miscegenation.

    Our enemies have chosen for the third form because it can be practised by stealth and deception, but of course the endresult is the same. Mulattos, mestizos and Eurasians are no more white. In them the white race has ended.

    White genocide by miscegenation has happened before in history. The original inhabitants of North Africa and the Middle East were white, which can still be seen from the Berbers in the Atlas mountains and from some Lebanese and Syrians. The rest of the Arabs are hopelessly mixed. The Aryans who invaded Iran and India got all mixed. In India more so than in Iran. Many parts of Latin America and the Caribbean have become meltingpots of Whites, Indians and negroes. In Latin America the term “white” even is more a social than a racial term.

    Social separation by caste or religion does not work, only territorial separation does work. Therefore the struggle for racial preservation is essentially a struggle for an exclusive territory. All our efforts should concentrate on that.

  9. Theodore
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Certainly, Jews, Eurasians and other non-Whites, etc. should be held accountable for White Genocide, and blaming Jews is of course popular among a significant portion of the “movement.”

    But that can only go so far. In the last analysis, all these peoples can harm Whites only insofar as Whites allow them to do so. Merkel, insofar as I know, is not a Jew, Negro, or half-Japanese Eurasian. Neither are other European leaders frothing at the mouth in favor of race replacement, and, in addition, most of the large crowds filling Western European cities in support of the “refugees” are of native stock as well.

    We could argue that all these people are “brainwashed by the Jews” and all the usual “movement” memes. But people need to be held accountable for their actions; if not, then we must accept that most Whites, including “elites,” are no better than children, who cannot think for themselves.

    If we accept that last bit, then this should inform how we go about changing the System, and what kind of new arrangement must take its place.

    • anon
      Posted September 15, 2015 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

      ” In the last analysis, all these peoples can harm Whites only insofar as Whites allow them to do so.”

      True but white people aren’t going to act to prevent them from harming us until they realize they are harming us.

      • Posted September 16, 2015 at 12:49 am | Permalink

        Harming us? There is no us. They don’t see you as one of them. They see anyone pushing the White Genocide tack as a vile racist, which is something the overwhelming majority of Whites do not want to be. This is the point the bug-juice drinkers just do not get. They do not understand that appreciation of Whiteness is a prerequisite of caring whether or not Whites go extinct (or are being “genocided” if we *insist* on loading the language).

        Tell them over and over and over and over again my friend – they don’t believe in the value of Whiteness, so why should they care if Whiteness is wiped out? If you can figure out how to get White people to care about Whiteness, you won’t have to warn them about the danger of anti-Whiteness, they will naturally take measures to defend their racial identity as rabidly as they currently defend their sports team, political, or national identities.

  10. Capercaillie
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    Resisting and defeating globalization, along with the globalist elites who promote this trend, is an important dimension of this struggle. It’s a cultural, meta-political and political struggle.

    Also, it’s worth noting that there are many non-White movements who are opposed to globalization all over the world. I think these are unwitting allies.

    The defeat of globalist elites would provide a more friendly environment for identitarian politics and ethno-nationalism, traditionalism and so on.

    “to eliminate strife, they promote miscegenation to create a homogeneous mongrel race”

    They promote miscegenation for whites, not for everyone. A glaring example of this: Nicolas Sarkozy.

    • whitewolf60
      Posted November 12, 2015 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

      “To eliminate strife…”

      And I think that anyone with half a brain should realize that “strife” will never be eliminated, even in a world composed entirely of Mulattos with frizzy, blond afros. The only thing eliminated will be racial diversity.

  11. anon
    Posted September 15, 2015 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Good stuff, some thoughts.

    1. Pushing the idea of genocide into someone’s head, even if they don’t accept it, will hopefully plant a seed that will help them see it sooner as reality gradually forces them to see.

    2. Proof of intent is inherent in the process of description. Once the mechanism of genocide is described and extrapolated to its logical conclusion then the other side can no longer claim lack of intent from that point on. They may claim they *had* no intent prior to that point but if they still support the policies that extrapolate to genocide *after* they have been told then a guilty verdict is the only conclusion.

    3. One difference with their miscegenation is they generally only do it with people from high IQ groups while promoting the opposite for everyone else. If you counted the Jews who marry out I doubt more than 1% married Africans.

    4. I think a lot of what they do is simply anti for the sake of it i.e. they are always paranoid and hostile about the host population so they attack the host’s culture to weaken them. An extension of that is the more healthy the host culture is/was the more warped and damaging their anti-culture is. This would be an example of an argument that doesn’t presume genocidal intent – up to the point where it is explained.

  12. Posted September 15, 2015 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    “People could be taught to value family life over selfishness, hedonism, and careerism; feminism could be discouraged; access to birth control and abortion could be restricted; laws could be changed to make family formation affordable; racial separation, immigration restriction, and economic nationalism could become policy again; miscegenation could be outlawed. Indeed, White Nationalists support just such policies to halt white extinction.”

    Very true. But liberals will disagree with the unstated but obvious premise that the “freedoms” we want to abolish are inauthentic and worthless. Most people see feminism, e.g., not as a brainwashing enterprise but a collective noun for individual women’s choices, and they regard the individual as the final authority on what is good for him or her, while denying any moral legitimacy to communitarian concerns.

    People I’ve talked to about this won’t make the conceptual leap to regarding what is happening as genocide because they think (1) that the average Joe, who votes for multiculturalism and has mixed race children, etc., is an autonomous, rational agent, and (2) a worse crime than the one we allege (“cold” genocide) would be for racialist authoritarians to stand in the way of Joe’s decisions about what make him happy.

    Sad but true.

  13. william Allingham
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 1:01 am | Permalink

    Regarding miscegenation i really believe that mexicans pose a greater threat to white people than blacks, i have been saying this a lot. I have read in American Renaissance people saying that mexicans are decent people and have family values and arent such a threat, bla bla bla… i disagree, mexicans are the biggest threat to America (beginning with their numbers), they are more mischievous and deceiving even than blacks (i believe blacks are more “openly brutal “and “honestly bad”) when i said that white people who marry mexican women are looking more for a servant than a human being with whom they feel at the same level, my comments were removed, mexican scholars recognize that mexican culture is a culture of deception and lies (and seem almost proud of it, Octavio Paz wrote “we lie out of pleasure and fantasy, lying has a decisive importance in our daily lives, politics, love and frindship..thats why denouncing it is futile”) thus it is not surprising that they court white people when in their hearts they feel contempt for white culture (famous sociologist Oscar Lewis recognized that mexican poors claimed to profess values they didnt practice).

    mexicans see the USA as a pinata they want to destroy in order to grab the benefits that are inside. mexican culture is totally incompatible with progress and science, they have always been pessimistic (since aztec times, every sunset they were weary that the sun wouldnt rise again next norning) and intolerant (as PhD, David Carrasco would put it “The aztecs were not tolerant of dissent, doing your own thing, hanging out or blurring distinctions”) mexicans are more like soulless communists by character (again, since aztec times they had no concept of “respect for the individuality’).

    one sociological study discovered that mexicans believe that “if something is true it must be bad”, with that mentality and culture how do we expect to keep progress and discoveries in the USA?.

    the aztecs when confronted with a problem that threatened the stability of their empire instead of making changes in organization or developing new tactics decided to increase the number of human sacrifices, when they were fearful of the spanish advances, the emperor (presumably the most learned person in the empire) decided to send magicians in their way to cast them spells in order to stop them (he was very disappointed to find out that it didnt work).

    regarding the bad impact of feminism on white birth rates I think that we should return to our pagan wisdom and start practicing Polygamy again just as the ancient Germans and Celts did, this would certainly boost white birth rates, it would not be so difficult since many modern morals are being questioned, ironically, by the Jewish media so maybe we could put a twist to what the Jews are promoting and use it in our own advantage,. Mexicans have higher birth rates than whites specially because they have children with different women (who in their turn have already had children from different men), if white women were to start raising more children even if from different men that would be the key to our survival (and at the same time they can feel sexually liberated, like a form of feminism but without contraceptives) more importantly since i suspect there is a greater ratio of women to men in the world.

    Even talented homosexual white men could be encouraged to pass on their genes just as in ancient pagan societies where men had the obligation to reproduce no matter their sexual preferences since it has been proven that homosexuality “most of the time”is not genetically determined (it rather seems to be “mostly” Epigenetic or related to brain development in the womb, as suggested by Dick Swaab). otherwise we could end up being too choosy about who, how and why should be encouraged to reproduce just to see our race die out.

    • Radouane
      Posted September 16, 2015 at 2:36 am | Permalink

      Dr. Samuel Francis believed(East) Asians are the biggest threat to Whites because of miscegenation. From what I have personally seen in North America, despite what the Judeo-controlled media will not show, is that East Asian women will practically pair themselves with any halfway decent conservative leaning White men in order to poach them. They are somewhat intelligent and know they are getting superior genes. The yellow women unfortunately will never stop until they are told they must not be around us. However, what you stated is true on the lower end for Whites in terms of income and intelligence, Mestizos and other non-White groups from Latin America will try to get superior genes where they can get them. This is on the lower end of North American White men. Thanks for your knowledge about the culture(s) in Mexico. If you have any links, please post them. I will do my research as well.

      • Theodore
        Posted September 16, 2015 at 6:40 am | Permalink

        I agree 100%. Exhibit A: Derbyshire, John.

        Although I’m not sure that Derbyshire is even “halfway decent.”

      • william Allingham
        Posted September 16, 2015 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

        A great, and unfortunately neglected book about modern mexican mentality is “Bordering on Chaos” by Andres Oppenheimer, it is the most crude and realistic i have read about the subject (i even think it should be reviewed in this site). regarding parallels with the Aztecs i had to dig into Mesoamerican history (David Carrasco would be a good authority).

        Good luck

    • Marc
      Posted September 16, 2015 at 5:11 am | Permalink

      Polygamy NEVER works!!! Since the ratio of Male to Female offspring is exactly one to one…If you marry, for example, with 6 women, you are actually DENYING to 5 other men the possibility of ever marrying or reproducing!! Simple logic!…

      • Franklin Ryckaert
        Posted September 16, 2015 at 9:25 am | Permalink

        Plygamy not only doesn’t work (it is rare even among Muslims), it goes against everything Western culture stands for. In Western culture woman is respected and treated as an equal partner. Our demographic decline only demands on average 2,1 children per couple. You don’t need polygamy to achieve that.

        • william Allingham
          Posted September 16, 2015 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

          yes, it was my mistake, i think the word Polygamy doesnt apply here, Perhaps I should have said that we should return to the sexual and moral openness of the ancient pagans.what i had in mind was that if white women have children, even if they dont want to marry (they can always change their minds, marry and have more children with another man) that would boost birth rates.

          many mexican women feel feminine pride about raising children by their own when the relationship doesnt work (which is not unusual), and then fall in love again and have more children with another man etc.. I dont know why i associated this situation with the aztecs being Polygamous (i realize are different things).

          I had a Swiss friend who was very receptive of ideas about racial differences and told me he didnt like foreigners nevertheless he had troubles with his girlfriend and said he had no interest in having to care about children, i think that if people like him end up having an affair that ends up with children it would increase birth rates, even if they dont marry (the single mom will be free to have as many children as she wants until she finds the right man)

          that said the ideal would be to have families like the ones of the past in which couples had up to dozens of children which would necessitate spending less on wars or immigrants and more on your own family but it seems unlikely that we will be able to return to a pre-feminist, pre-secular-values past and that would not address modern feminist concerns.

          if the Church were allowed, it would even try to tell you at what time of the day you should have sex, my point is that a sense of freedom regarding sexual expression existed among the Celto-Germanic peoples before the inception of Christianity, and i think thats what many women and men are looking for, When Julia Domna (wife of the Roman emperor Septimius Severus) was shocked by the openness whit which Celtic women chose their husbands AND LOVERS, the wife of the British chieftain to whom she had uttered her opinions responded “We Celtic women obey the demands of nature in a more moral way than the women of Rome, we consort openly with the best men, but you, of Rome, allow yourselves to be debauched in secret by the vilest”

          the idea of strict monogamy and human nature being sinful had always been alien to white people until the arrival of this lebanite ideology called Christianity.

          but perhaps im going to the extreme, maybe the only thing that is required to boost birth rates is a better economic system that allows white people to cope better with big families, if thast the case i would be content with that solution.

  14. Radouane
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 2:25 am | Permalink

    I just want to add one clarification. Miscegenation is sex, marriage, or reproduction with those of another race according to a dictionary definition I found. This makes sense given that all these things are inherently intertwined whether we choose to separate them or not to bring them together. This is why I believe we should morally stand against all of these things.

  15. R_Moreland
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 6:23 am | Permalink

    Here is one way to interpret the situation: the history of humankind is one long series of struggles in which various tribes, nations and races strive for dominance. Along the way, they wipe out or subjugate competing tribes, nations and races. The dilemma is that White people today no longer want to engage in this struggle. Consequently, other races consciously or unconsciously detect White weakness and pile in on it.

    Statements of an Ignatiev or Kambon are essentially probes, testing White resolve which is found lacking. The next stage is with guerrilla raids (flashmobs, Polar Bear punching, car burnings in Europe, etc.) which, since White people do not retaliate against them, open to the next stage. Third world masses migrate into Europe while US cities are sacked by non-White mobs (egged on by the usual collaborators). The No-Go Zones in ancient European cities, and the staking out of gang and rioter territory in places like Baltimore (with apparent collaboration of the city government) are unto barbarians establishing kingdoms with the frontiers of decadent civilized empires.

    Point is, the real dilemma is not so much the various enemies of the White race (though they are a menace). Really, they are acting per standard human operating procedure. I’d give you that your average African or Muslim would think it madness to believe in such things as equality or multiculturalism. How long would your tribe last if it fell for such nonsense?

    Really, the dilemma is in a failure of the will to power among Whites.

    Let’s note that up until the mid-20th century White people generally believed in the world as a place of racial struggle. This took form in such ideologies as Social Darwinism and Manifest Destiny. And it worked to give Whites global dominance. We did it once. We can do it again. The thing is in waking up White people.

  16. Capercaillie
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 7:00 am | Permalink

    Breaking news:

    Fidesz founder says racial war being waged against whites in Europe.

    Hungarian “Free Press”, haha!

    (Chances of a” color revolution” in Hungary? International sanctions? Stay tuned)

  17. _Shawn_
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    Good points in this post.

    The mainstream media is thee single most important instrument that will have to be under control by the government once our side is on power. So we will have to throw out “freedom of the press” as it is now interpreted. The mainstream media, as we know, is largely controlled Jewish oligarchs. Our elites and others are blackmailed by the media: support the policies and culture of White genocide or be called racist. Broader, nearly everything is shaped by news media and culture: whether or not Whites support a healthy future or whether we support our destruction.

    So who is to control the mainstream media once our side is in power? We have two choices, rich Gentiles (the new oligarchs) or politicians & bureaucrats. The benevolent government scenario is much more likely than the benevolent oligarch scenario. Do we really want Bill Gates and Ted Turner to run things, people who, through unconstrained individualism, have promoted mass immigration, among other evil policies, and enriched themselves at the cost of whites & yet have suffered none of the costs?

    Putin’s model has been rather effective. He essentially has control over the largest media outlets but freedom of speech is allowed for smaller outlets.

  18. _Shawn_
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 9:21 am | Permalink

    Historically Christianity has helped support a healthy future for Whites and at times has done the opposite. But today, generally speaking, Christianity is entirely race-blind, with pastors constantly officiating interracial marriages and engaging in race-blind “do gooderism.”

    A case in point is the Lutheran Social Services. I was raised Lutheran and am outraged by them. Do an internet search for “Stop Lutheran Social Services in Fargo!” for one example. Despite the signatures, the leader or LSS is going to go through with this project.

    This is another example of the importance of controlling the mainstream media. Control the primary information flow and the downstream will gradually fall in place.

  19. Peter Quint
    Posted September 16, 2015 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    The core problem has and always will be Christianity. Until we get our own religion our backs will be against the wall. You never see the white christian clerics (WCC) decrying the destruction and dispossession of the white race; they always gloat about it, anticipating it. You never see WCCs organizing against homosexual marriage. You never see WCCs organizing against sending our daughters to combat zones. You never see WCCs organizing against miscegenation. You never see WCCs organizing against integration. The WCC has been the jew’s man-on-the-ground for two thousand years, always suppressing, diffusing, and pacifying white dissidence. If a white dissident appears to be uncontrollable the WCC simply sends a report on that individual up to jew headquarters. The WCC has been sending annual reports up to jew headquarters for two thousand years. When you are confronted with a WCC, you are always facing a Marxist agent.

    • william Allingham
      Posted September 16, 2015 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

      historians tend to see Christianity as the benevolent counterweight to Roman despotism, but i think a better way to understand it is to realize that, Christianity is the spawn of a society like ancient Rome, it wouldnt have existed if it were not because of Romes imperialism and materialism, they are like different faces of the same coin, or like the two members playing a different role in a sick relationship (a relationship you dont want to be part of, neither be partisan of either side of it). thats the tricky part, just like controlled opposition, we are led to think that we must either endorse Roman values or Christian denial-of-the-self (the false dichotomy fallacy) Where is the healthy option for white people? i think we must look into our pagan roots

      Hitler understood that Roman law was unbrotherly and tended to the abuse of people, whereas Germanic law promoted reciprocity and responsibility towards the community, so where does canon (Christian) law falls? Christian law is self defeating (turn the other cheek, let yourself be preyed upon and humiliated) whats is the just price of a thing without concern for progress and quality, give indiscriminately without regard for merit, the greatest virtue is charity etc.
      Celto-Germanic peoples were willing to help when it was necessary but they didnt condition people to be saved they rather promoted independence, dignity and self-assertion, they were not obsessed with charity because in a society like theirs “there was something for everyone” and thus was not needed, neither was expected to become essential part of their society.

      thus we start to see the real (pathological) face of Christianity so alien to the practical and optimistic view of white people

      • whitewolf60
        Posted November 12, 2015 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

        Christianity might be the most clever trick ever foisted upon Humanity:

        “Let your abusers do what they will, and you will be rewarded AFTER you die… and so will your abusers be punished”.

  20. rhondda
    Posted September 17, 2015 at 9:44 am | Permalink

    ‘why is it important to establish that white extinction is actually white genocide? It is easy to understand why people might shy away from such a truth, for it implies that whites are not just the victims of a ghastly mistake, or an impersonal sociopolitical “system,” or an inhuman cosmic or historical destiny, but of knowing malice—of principled enmity—of diabolical evil. It is hard to accept that such evil exists, much less that it wills our annihilation.’

    Yes, it is hard to accept because most whites do not will another’s annihilation. Evil then is not ignorance which can be corrected, not original sin which can be atoned, nor self defense which is a natural reaction, but malicious intent developed over a period of time and carried out mostly by deception and surrogate killers. They go after what you value most and then mock you with your own values. ( need to share, need to help, need to give more)

    • Richard Edmonds
      Posted September 19, 2015 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

      Rhondda talks of our “values”: Let our values include modesty. Let us Whites say loudly and clearly that we cannot solve the world’s problems. Let us acknowledge the obvious fact that the Africans have lived in Africa, and the Asians have lived in Asia for countless millennia; and they have lived and thrived in their respective continents and regions for these many millennia quite without any help from us Europeans: proof indeed that they don’t need us.

      As for “mocking us with our own values” : the “value” that is mocked and cunningly exploited is the arrogance and the ignorance of Western liberals who do believe that they can solve the problems of the world. A very foolish concept.

  21. dolph9
    Posted September 18, 2015 at 3:40 am | Permalink

    Things may be too far gone to save white nations, much less any group that becomes too advanced. East Asian birth rates, for example, are just as low as whites, though they aren’t giving up their lands.

    The particular combination of generosity + crowded conditions + birth control is simply a killer.

    This is not defeatism! Remember, our current system is on its absolute last legs. It’s not going to survive. It’s not up to us to determine what happens 50 years from now, we’ll all be dead. This is true anyway, but it’s particularly true in an environment of diminishing returns, peak oil, resource decline.

    In other words, those arabs and blacks are just as dead as whites, they just don’t know it yet. Without constantly increasing oil revenue and aid, they will massacre each other in civil war.

    Let’s debate what the next system will look like, rather than trying to reform this one.

  22. Posted September 26, 2015 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for writing this excellent article. We are running this on our website with a link back to you guys. Cheers.

    • madeline clayman
      Posted November 4, 2015 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

      I totally agree. Can only hope more and more realize what’s said here is true.

  23. Kenneth Whitman
    Posted September 27, 2015 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    “White Guilt” = (b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group…I believe that this is being used on a massive scale in academia and media to speed up the process.

    • madeline clayman
      Posted November 4, 2015 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

      Absolutely right. I’ve seen virtually all of the items stated in Greg Johnson’s article to be true over my many, many years of interest in and research of politics and human behavior. The globalist/Radical Liberal power groups who control the U.S. and E.U. totally, rapidly more openly, are overwhelmingly successful in “wiping out” “Whites” (those identified as believing in the validity of Anglo/northern European standards and norms…at least as they were up until the 50’s-early 60’s). Up to recently they’ve been doing this rather slowly and clandestine. Now, it’s out in the open and accelerating at breakneck speed. I think this could be in part in case the Radicals don’t win the WH in ’16. The U.S election will impact both U.S. and E.U.greatly, even though I believe a Republican victory could indeed be just “fake” regarding any kind of real “change” in the present m.o. for both U.S. and E.U. The Whites are indeed in the middle of a race war with their extermination being the goal of their enemies.

  24. Posted October 5, 2015 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    FYI, I translated the article in french here :

  25. fuk u. white devils
    Posted October 11, 2015 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps it’s just karma. For thousands of years albinos have invaded every part of this world raping killing millions even claiming God gave them the right to rape steal and kill. Even remaking the image of God into their own. Extinction which is not genocide is something you devils earned. So be proud of this death you worked so hard for.

  26. Inception
    Posted November 12, 2015 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Forced “diversity” i.e., white genocide via non-white immigration and assimilation is OFFICIAL POLICY not some random, naturally occurring accident.

  27. Posted November 20, 2015 at 4:33 am | Permalink

    The crux of the White Genocide argument is that there are people who are supporting a program which will logically lead to white people being assimilated out through intermarriage and mass migration.

    The logical conclusion is obvious, and anti-whites admit to it, admit it is desirable and cannot put forward an argument or proof that this won’t happen.

    Anything which may be done to prevent this outcome is labelled by anti-whites as “racist”. Anything. Whether that be a single white nation putting in policy to stay white, or white people segregating, or white people suggesting against interracial marriage. They are ALL racist. They don’t support limiting immigration. They don’t suggest that maybe mass non-white immigration can cease when a threshold is reached.

    So anti-whites support everything which will result in whites being assimilated out. They reject ANYTHING which may be put forward to prevent it.

    Now, if this has been pointed out to them, and they cannot refute the argument, then they are then aware they are committing Genocide. Note that at this point, most anti-whites then don’t refute, but rather rationalise it, suggest it doesn’t matter, suggest that perhaps it’s deserved, or no big deal, or its “progress”, or better than the alternative, or whatever. They justify Genocide rather than prove it’s not occurring.

    It is irrelevant whether they “know what they are doing” or not. It has been pointed out. Many times. Not only by pro-whites, but by anti-whites.

    I simply don’t buy that they don’t know. The argument that “when the races are mixed, there will be no racism any more” has been put forward ad nauseum. Everyone is familiar with it. Everyone knows that it is only white nations which must become multiracial. How else do they know to get upset when Hungary doesn’t take in refugees but not care when China which has millions of empty homes begging for people doesn’t?

    Suggesting that perhaps anti-whites aren’t aware is a bad strategy. They say all the time that whites must go. They seem to be well aware of any perceived Islamophobia, of any comment which might cause angst for a person of colour, but aren’t aware of people saying it will be great when Whites are gone?

    Ignorance is no excuse. If someone tells you that the additive you put into coffee is going to kill someone, and you cannot prove otherwise, then if you continue to do so, you are responsible for the ensuing death.

    There cannot be any room, nor acceptance of ignorance of this matter. Once they have been told of the consequences of current policies and ‘morals’ leading to Genocide, and they’ve failed to prove that it doesn’t logically lead to it, then they are obligated, morally, if they don’t support Genocide, to reconsider their position. If they refuse, they are accepting the outcome.

    It must be put in such a stark matter. It must become as unacceptable to be neutral on this issue.

  28. VKC
    Posted January 15, 2016 at 5:08 pm | Permalink


    I think you need to look into why it is that so many white people of both genders/sexes are homosexual, asexual and/or single by choice. Couldn’t it be that white people(s) are genetically predisposed to some of the behaviors which inhibit reproduction? Perhaps more so than other races?

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted January 15, 2016 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

      The numbers are quite small. Is there any evidence that whites are more disposed toward those abnormalities than other races?

  29. Greg Johnson
    Posted February 27, 2016 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure you’re just trying to be funny. Asians are typically very ugly people, who produce ugly and puny hybrids with whites. I always ask white men who have Yellow Fever if they want a son that looks like her father or brother. The shuddering and revulsion are amusing.

    Asian girls are smart, orderly, and giggle cutely while clutching their math books to their flat chests. They have simplified sex doll faces. White men find it easier to overlook the racial differences. This is what makes Asians far more dangerous than whites. So we need absolute prohibitions against all forms of race-mixing.

    • Leon
      Posted February 28, 2016 at 1:51 am | Permalink

      I’ve seen good-looking White-Asian hybrids, and I’ve seen ugly ones, however areas where such mixing was historically frequent (i.e. Central Asia) tend to have rather ugly populations (although here Middle Eastern admixture has to be taken into account). However it’s no question that the most beautiful women in the world, and the cutest children, are White. As to Eurasians having “no racial confusion”, the falseness of that statement can be verified by visiting any one of the numerous websites created by Eurasians, specifically to share their confusion and frustration about their mixed origins.

  30. Matthew
    Posted May 15, 2016 at 1:31 am | Permalink

    Honestly the views expressed in this article are disgusting. Suggesting that things such as feminism and interracial couples are all part of some plot to cause the extinction of whites is completely ludicrous. Even if “white genocide” did actually exist, it would be a positive thing. If distinct races cease to exist, then all people can finally be equal. All of this talk about bringing back segregation and banning interracial couples to keep the white race alive is not only horribly bigoted, but also a completely idiotic idea that would never work. Anyone who proposed ideas like this would be committing political suicide. That person would be viewed as a racist and bigot for the rest of their career, and rightly so, because racist and bigoted is exactly what those policies are. These issues have already been dealt with decades ago. For once in your upper-middle class white male life, you’re in the minority. The only people who will ever agree with you on this are those who are just as bigoted as you are, and that is an extremely small minority. Like it or not, there’s absolutely nothing you or anyone else can do about this supposed “white genocide”, and the sooner you can accept that, the sooner you can stop sharing your racist opinions with others- although, let’s be honest, you’ll probably never stop spouting off your hatred to anyone who isn’t white.

    • Greg Johnson
      Posted May 15, 2016 at 10:07 am | Permalink

      Are you a Jew?

  31. Voco Veritas
    Posted December 23, 2020 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    There can be no doubt that the global genocide of whites is and has been underway for over 100 years. What astonishes me is so many “leaders” (mostly synonymous with “Traitors”) are working for the genocide of all whites despite them being white themselves! I suspect that should they succeed, God forbid, they will not live long but will be “eliminated” as no longer serving a useful purpose. Of course the interim period for them is full of things of this earth which are at best temporal delusions that will lead them to eternity in hell which is exactly where they belong.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs


    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics


    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles


    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace