Counter-Currents
To Burn or Not To Burn?
Reflections on the Burning of Refugee Centers in Ireland
Ganainm
1,121 words
Every nation likes to be best in the world at something. As things stand, we Irish Potato Negroes are world leaders in burning refugee centres without hurting anyone. Nobody comes even close to us. The prize for burning refugee centres with refugees inside goes to the Israelis, of course, but that is not a sport we want to indulge in.
Does burning refugee centers reduce the inflow of refugees?
Yes and no.
In the local and short term, yes, absolutely. There have been thirty-odd badly damaged refugee centers. None of them have had any refugees moved into them – yet. Only a handful of people have been arrested or charged with arson. One almost gets the impression that the Gardai are reluctant to investigate such fires: they dislike the refugees even more than the rest of us. There is rumour that the four fires in the Coolock refugee center were possibly set by the Gardai themselves, as a hint to government that they disagree with migration policy and strongly dislike their Commissioner, the notorious Drew Harris.
In the national sense, the record breaking, non-lethal arson attacks have happened at the same time as record breaking numbers of refugees and other foreigners coming into the country. Since the start of this year alone, refugee numbers are up by 60% or so. The government issued 250,000 social security numbers to charming, hard working foreigners in the last year. These are insane numbers. There are only 4 million ethnically Irish in the country. A quarter or more of all residents are foreigners. Ten more years of this? Do the math!
If we take each burnt refugee center as 200 residents, we have only reduced refugee accommodation by 6,000; a small number compared to the inflow. Just to match the flow of refugees, never mind general foreigners, we would have to quintuple the rate of burnings. That’s a lot of firelighters and thick toxic smoke from modern building materials. Count me out, boys.
Numerous people urged me to burn our local refugee center, including serving, uniformed members of the Garda Siochana. I declined: Ten minutes with a catapult could disable a building (windows and roof slates) without endangering human life through toxic smoke. That’s not endorsement or encouragement, just safety advice.
While burning refugee centers is 100% successful in the short term, peaceful protests are unfortunately 100% unsuccessful, so far. (There are some ongoing peaceful protests, and it is possible they will be successful. Let us pray.) If you want to see how they deal with our peaceful protests, look what they did in the Newtown MountKennedy in Co Wicklow. Coked up lunatics with English accents and Garda uniforms just wade into the women and children with truncheons and pepper spray. When the road is clear, the bus drives in with the jeering, gloating “refugees” inside.
The Leprechaun Factor
The modern leprechaun is a jovial character: all booze and pots of gold. But the old style boyos were potentially lethal. It was long a tradition not to disturb trees or destroy “fairy forts.” It was held that lots of grim misfortunes would befall you, including death. In Clonmel, the town that whipped Cromwell’s ass back in the day, there was a travellers site. They had the use of the field next door to run a couple of ponies, one of the positive sides of traveller culture that has not yet been exterminated. There were some fairy forts on the site.
Guess what our pretty boy Minister for Refugees Roderick O’Gorman decided? Let’s take the field away from the travellers and house a thousand single male refugees on it, right next to where the travellers live. This was deliberately designed to antagonise everybody in Clonmel. Why didn’t they leave the travellers their little field and put the refugees 200 yards away in the next field? Clonmel is surrounded by a thousand fields. Why take the travellers’ field?
Andrew Anglin has mentioned the concept of “cartoonish evil.” For some reason, they often go out of their way to do things in the most unpleasant and culturally inappropriate way possible. Is it to hypnotise us into a sense of despair and inaction?
There were numerous burnings of equipment and beatings of staff, but the preparations went ahead. They bulldozed the fairy forts. Then there was an accident. A weight of a couple hundred kilo fell nine or ten feet from a forklift. The site was badly organised. Someone was under the weight when it fell. The MSM are silent about it, but the word online is that someone is dead. Oh well. Sometimes that happens when you mess with the fairies. But the project is ongoing. Will the fairies strike again?
Legal Threats
There are two types of threats: criminal threats and legal threats. A criminal threat is when you tell the guy you will slice off his ear if he doesn’t stop renting his property to refugees. Obviously this writer does not endorse that. A legal threat is when you threaten legal action, and as the name implies, it’s perfectly legal.
For example, here’s a true story. A certain businessman had a property which he wanted to rent for refugees in the Dublin suburb of Finglas. Five other businessmen visited his house. They were wearing masks, possibly to prevent infection of Monkey Flu. Or possibly as an expression of their sexuality. You’ve heard of LGBT+? Here’s LGBT+MM (Masked Men).
Either way, wearing masks is perfectly legal. They engage the potential refugee landlord in general Potato Negro chit chat: the weather, the State of the Nation, Brit agents in the government, homosexuals in the hierarchy…
Then they get to the point: “The return on investment of refugees in your Finglas property will be lower than you think. We have some alternative suggestions as to what you could choose to do with it.”
The guy thinks it over, agrees with them, and the conversation ends in a friendly fashion. No crime reported, no crime committed. The system does not have the resources to protect all its hired helpers. Once the hired help are made aware of that, eyeball to eyeball, right on their own doorstep, many will prudently choose the path of least resistance.
“Wouldn’t it be great if it was like this all the time?” as Van Morrison sang.
Have you heard his recent album? Openly anti vax, anti Cranky Tribe and pro truth. It will chase your blues away, if you have them. Almost the only Irish/Ulster Scots artist with a functioning pair of cojones. A Jewish newspaper gave it a great review: “If you’ve ever wondered what The Protocols would sound like with a sax accompaniment, this is for you!”
As the Orangemen say: No Surrender! Ulster (and Connacht, Leinster and Munster) says “No!”
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
16 comments
A government that seeks the destruction of the nation’s people deserves to be removed from power. Since there is no popular mandate for what’s being done to you, and destruction is the inevitable outcome if unabated, then this is the situation at hand. The politicians must be delivered the message to stop their treasonable behavior immediately, or they will spend the rest of their lives in a prison cell.
“A government that seeks the destruction of the nation’s people deserves to be removed from power.” Removed from power? What they’re doing is straight up treason. They also have blood on their hands for the lives of our people who have been attacked, raped, killed, murdered by diversity.
XIV VERBA
If it were on my blog, I’d put it more strongly than that. If I get censored for it, I can set up another blog elsewhere, and I know exactly where I’d put it. Here, it’s different, and I try not to cross lines into being outright inflammatory. Most likely my editor appreciates it.
Are more people beginning to see that we have tried every way yet we continue to be attacked, which is leading to one option – millions of men marching mercilessly reclaiming our homelands, holding those responsible to account, & remigrate them all?
“There is no curse in Elvish, Entish or the tongues of Men for this treachery.”
Treebeard, in Lord of the Rings, The Two Towers.
Great reference! I shall remember it for future use.
For white preservationist intellectuals, the main philosophical task is the theorization of a new ethics of war for national survival in the face of contemporary ethnonational suicidalism (something I’ve been advocating for decades, but alas, to which I’ve been unable to contribute anything yet). By what moral right do one or two generations of pathological douchebags think they may destroy the work of millennia of ethnocultural development, and a million years of organic racial evolution?
War by non-military means (but backed up by the threat of military means) is being waged against our race by leaders of our race supported by substantial numbers of our race. Contra the disputed author of Ecclesiastes, this is truly something “new under the sun.”
I’m of the opinion that the invader resettlement should be opposed by the least harmful and least criminal means that work, with nothing being off the table.
It may or may not be wise to publicly advise people to follow the law, but I hope you don’t actually believe it! Otherwise, you give your enemies a trump card. What will you do when they declare all opposition illegal? Give up?
And it may or may not be wise to advise against violence and threats, but where would Europe be if they resisted historical Muslim invasions with only nonviolent, nonthreatening means? Think Muslims will be convinced to leave by a hunger strike, or even a general strike?
The Irish burning invader accommodations is one of the most inspiring things of the past few years. But even there you give your enemies a trump card. All they have to do is sneak one invader inside… or perhaps not even that, given your stated opposition to burning the local invader barracks to avoid toxic smoke. Ireland can recover from a bit of toxic smoke. It can’t recover from being swamped to the point where you’re heavily outnumbered. You’re still 3:1, but that won’t last long, and if we’re talking fighting-age men you may be nearly outnumbered already…
The problem there, here, everywhere, is that only minorities of whites are true patriots of race (or even, I would add, true conservatives). Whites could stop the invasions if they wanted to, at least in most white nations apart from the US. But while many feel uneasy about the colonization, they obviously don’t feel passionately enough about it to stop it. Look at France, look at Germany, look at England. All have what we in America do not have: overtly restrictionist parties. Are we asserting that elections in all those countries are actually being stolen, that the true recent winners were RN, AfD and Farage’s Reform? Maybe that is the case; I don’t know. But based on how white liberals or my acquaintance think and behave here, I doubt it.
This leads to the conclusion I’ve been making for years now. Prowhites are minorities everywhere, even though collectively in the world I believe we could approach a mighty number, very probably in excess of 100 million (out of perhaps 500-600 million objective racial whites on the planet; I include someone like Putin as white, but not all Russian citizens). Hence my conclusion that the only hope for genuine white racial preservation (WP) is massive territorial migration and ingathering of prowhites into one or a handful of existing sovereign, majority-white nations so as to make ourselves unchallengeable electoral majorities within them. Once we have those majorities, we can do exactly what’s been done to us everywhere, but in reverse: practice Dr. Johnson’s “slow cleanse”, and gradually transform these nations into white Racial States (ie, regimes dedicated to WP as their overriding telos).
The only alternatives to the slow cleanse being done to us everywhere, apart from this agenda of white migration and demographic conquest, are a) prowhite internal migration, so as to build up local prowhite majorities in the hopes of eventual secession when times become propitious, or b) some form of revolutionary violence aimed at ultimately reconquering our lost and stolen lands.
I would note that virtually no one here ever responds to this particular thought of mine, either to criticize or agree. I would love to see persuasive alternative paths to WP, ones that take into account the demoralizing fact that most whites, as evidenced in their voting, simply do not prioritize WP. But invariably this thought of mine is greeted with silence.
I think it’s a good idea. I would be up for it. Unfortunately, getting us to agree on where to go seems tricky…
In most countries the biggest party is the Apathy party: I think the UK turnout was barely 50%. I’m guessing that the Apathy party are not enthusiasts for migration. Is there any way we can get them to get off their backsides and vote?
Maybe I’m wrong, but even the liberals have had enough migrants at this stage. Apparently Sweden has FLIPPED: every political party, and every native Swede is like: Ok, enough already. We’ve been nice to them for years, but they are violent assholes. They have very few new refugees, and lots of them are leaving. Remigration has become normalised in Sweden. The problem will be to ensure that the politicians implement what they say they will.
Re migrating to a White Haven: Try Sweden? Or, if you’re prepared to learn Afrikaans, Orania.
Or come to Ireland. Just remember to import a legally held deer hunting rifle and get yourself a deer hunting licence when you land. There are lots of deer here, and the govt has extended the season.
Better still is to stand your ground locally. Home is home. Nowhere is safe from the migration madness, and perhaps you will be more effective in the resistance where you are most familiar with the culture. Get out of the big city and into the countryside, if possible.
Buy a chunk of land in the sticks with twenty or thirty others, everyone with their own private space, and cooperate on communal stuff. Might work out cheaper than you think.
One must be careful to avoid using words in a way that could be used as evidence against us. There is such a thing as FedPosting 🙂
I’ll post an update in a few days, but briefly, there have been major developments in the last few weeks. In Longford, there was a huge, fast fire in the town centre, and people in apartments had to scramble out as quickly as possible. I’ve asked the gardai were the people in the apartments foreign, and they haven’t answered, so I presume they were. First ever arson attack on a building where people were actually living. Nobody killed or injured, thank God. There was almost total media silence on it. In Merchants Quay, central Dublin a large group of foreign squatters were physically dragged out and roughed up by guys NOT wearing masks. The cops seemed not to have shown up at all, and very little media coverage. The lads were apparently hired by the owner, so it’s technically more of financial disagreement, rather than an anti-migration protest.
In Cork, an Indian student claims that a guy crept up behind him on the street and put a rope around his neck! The Indian now claims that he feels unsafe and uncomfortable in Ireland. I’m sure the Rope Guy, if he is asked about the incident, will explain that it’s just an old Irish tradition calling “slagging”, a bit of innocent horseplay.
If this leads to an uprising and the overthrow of the treasonous Jewish government, I support the Irish revolution. I hope this is just the beginning. Be brave white Irishmen.
Who in the Irish government is Jewish?
All mass immigration into White lands is spearheaded and organized by jews. This is simply a fact. The sad, smug White ruling class are just there to put a White face on the jewish supremacist agenda to dissolve White people into a sea of darkies.
There’s a great article over at unz.com, by Marshall Yeats on Jewish influence on Irish migration policy.
I’m of the opinion that there are a number of crypto Jews in the Irish cabinet. Check out the photos of Michael Martin, Leo Varadkar and our very suspiciously named Taoiseach (PM) Simon Harris. Plus we’ve got open English Jews in top jobs in RTE (Kevin Bakhurst)l, the media commission (Godfrey something). Some of the people directly benefitting from housing refugees are Jewish or Anglo-Jewish.
It will be easier to convince migrants that it is time for them to remigrate, rather than convincing the Government that it’s time to send them back. The Govt have a lot of protection and are making lots of money from it. The migrants are exposed to us Irish on the street everyday.
One tactic that we will have to use, is reduce our levels of politeness with dodgy looking foreigners. Another is to boycott them, by completely ignoring them: no Hello, no friendly smile, nothing. Look through them as if they weren’t there.
Another, potentially very dangerous, tactic is one I haven’t tried yet. Certain foreigners like to own the footpath. They won’t move out of the way, and will expect you to change course. We must stand our ground, and refuse to politely move out of their way.
Another tactic is the Gaelic Glare. Stare at them, with a snarl on your face. Let them be the first to break eye contact.
Basically, they are playing male dominance games with us. We must play them back at them!
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.