Jacob “Jack” Lew:
Obama’s Nominee for Secretary of the Treasury
Andrew Hamilton
President Obama recently named several top-level appointees for his second term. They require Congressional approval.
The most contentious is former US Senator Chuck Hagel (R.-Neb.), an Episcopalian of German, Polish, and Irish descent for Secretary of Defense. Neoconservatives castigate him as “anti-Semitic” because they deem him insufficiently slavish to Israel and its Amen Corner.
If only ’twere true.
Another is US Senator John Kerry (D.-Mass.) to be Secretary of State. Kerry’s father, a crypto-Jew who passed as an Irish Catholic, was a high-level Foreign Service officer who served in the State Department’s Bureau of United Nations Affairs. Kerry’s mother was a member of the social aristocratic Forbes family of Boston. Kerry is a product of the genetic intertwining with native elites that Jews invariably engage in as part of their inborn, non-territorial group strategy.
For CIA Director Obama selected John O. Brennan, currently “chief counterterrorism adviser”—formally, Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and Assistant to the President. Brennan, the son of Irish Catholic immigrants to New Jersey and a lifetime CIA apparatchik, seems to hate American freedom.
Finally, for the key post of Treasury Secretary the President chose—surprise, surprise—his White House Chief of Staff, an observant Orthodox Jew named Jacob “Jack” Lew, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Brookings Institution.
He is called “Jack” rather than “Jacob” as many Jews semi-disguise their Old Testament first names with more mainstream-sounding nicknames: “Ben” rather than Benjamin, “Dan” rather than Daniel, “Josh” rather than Joshua. Wikipedia‘s page about him, which has been around a long time because of the many prominent positions he’s held, was headed “Jacob Lew” until yesterday, when it was changed to “Jack Lew.”
Lew’s name was floated to news organizations three or four days before its formal announcement to the public.
Articles about the Treasury nominee in the Establishment press—AP, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, USA Today, National Public Radio, Bloomberg, the National Journal, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Yahoo! News—amount to little more than PR puff pieces.
The Mediator
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bf75/4bf75997f10ecb44573d12a19a15382d3d783268" alt="At the center of power: Jacob Lew (R) with Obama and presidential assistant Rob Nabors in the White House Oval Office. Lew, Nabors' mentor, elevated his subordinate to prominence in Washington."
At the center of power: Jacob Lew (R) with Obama and presidential assistant Rob Nabors in the White House Oval Office. Lew, Nabors’ mentor, elevated his subordinate to prominence in Washington.
Over the years Lew has served as senior adviser to Leftist House Speaker “Tip” O’Neill (D.-Mass.), Special Assistant to President Clinton, a member of Clinton’s National Security Council, and Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under both Clinton and Obama.
“My mother could never understand how I became OMB director,” Lew, an attorney, confided to a reporter. “Because I’m not an economist, I’m not a finance professional.”
Well, she’s not the only one. Now he’s advanced to Treasury Secretary, where he’ll lead a massive bureaucracy and act as principal economic adviser to the President of the United States.
Here’s how Lew perceives his particular expertise, according to Politico‘s “Ben” Smith:
The thing that I learned early on was there’s a space in Washington that is not deeply populated, which is a bridge between the highly technical and the political. You didn’t have to be the best politician, and you didn’t have to be the best numbers cruncher or analyst. But if you could be fluent in both worlds and respected enough in both worlds, you could have an opportunity to be a translator and to make a difference.
I can lay out complicated ideas so that people can see where they agree and where they disagree and not have fights that they don’t agree on and see the things that they want to work together on and identify where the differences are. That kind of civil discourse and that translating between technical and political—it’s not divorced from having a [Left-wing] worldview.
Smith noted that “Lew was in New York to give the commencement address at Forest Hills High School [his alma mater], where he extolled the values of immigration.” Indeed, Lew keeps a scale model of Ellis Island on his desk in the White House.
Publicly, Lew maintains a low profile despite his relentlessly upward Washington career path. A handwriting analyst told ABC News that Lew’s weird signature, which will appear on all US currency unless he changes it (which the media and those who speak through it are indirectly pressuring him to do), indicates that he is “not interested in communicating and . . . doesn’t want to give away more than necessary.”
For a clear graphic summary of Lew’s employment history see his Revolving Door profile at OpenSecrets.org, an online database of the Center for Responsive Politics, an Establishment website.
Secretary of the Treasury
The new Cabinet position is a plum job; the Treasury Secretary ranks fifth in the presidential line of succession after only the Secretary of State (John Kerry, if confirmed) among Cabinet officials.
Because in a surveillance state the Treasury Department plays an essential role in destroying the financial underpinnings of groups opposed to government policy and surreptitiously undermines the sovereignty of foreign nations targeted by Jews, Israel, the UN, the EU, and the US, Treasury posts are extremely important positions.
America’s first Jewish Treasury Secretary was virulent Germanophobe Henry Morgenthau, Jr. under Franklin D. Roosevelt—though the horrifying anti-Semite (we are constantly told because he expelled Jews from his war zone in 1862) President Ulysses S. Grant in 1869 offered the post to Jewish financier Joseph Seligman, who turned it down.
Morgenthau was responsible for the disgusting Morgenthau Plan, a “vicious campaign for the starvation of central Europe” drafted in conjunction with Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Harry Dexter White, a Communist spy. Despite his WASP-sounding name, White was also Jewish. See Prof. Anthony Kubek, “The Henry Morgenthau Plan and the Problem of Policy Perversion” (1989):
Never before in American history had an unelected bureaucracy of faceless, “fourth floor” officials exercised such arbitrary power over the future of nations as did Harry Dexter White and his associates in the Department of the Treasury under Henry Morgenthau, Jr. What they attempted to do in their curious twisting of American ideals, and how close they came to complete success, is demonstrated in the Morgenthau Diaries.
Unsurprisingly, Jews have become more common since: financier C. Douglas Dillon (a quarter-Jew) (John Kennedy), W. Michael Blumenthal (Jimmy Carter), and Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers (Bill Clinton).
Stuart A. Levey briefly served as Obama’s Acting Treasury Secretary prior to the appointment of Timothy Geithner. His main position under both George W. Bush and Obama was Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. He played a key behind-the-scenes role for many years undermining the economies of Iran and North Korea within the international financial system. He bitterly hated Saudi Arabia as well. Levey was succeeded in Treasury’s “Terrorism” post in 2011 by another Jew, David S. Cohen.
These are not positions of minor importance.
Financial Wizard
Lew’s father immigrated to New York City from Poland.
Jacob Lew attended Carleton College, an expensive private college in Northfield, Minnesota, where his faculty adviser was Left-wing activist and political science professor Paul Wellstone (D.), who later assumed the US Senate seat that Minnesota permanently reserves for Jews. New York City TV funnyman Al Franken (D.) is the current occupant.
Wellstone launched young Lew’s Washington career by securing a job for him with Jewish feminist battleaxe Rep. Bella Abzug (D.-N.Y.) in the nation’s capital.
Lew graduated from Harvard University in 1978 and Georgetown University Law Center in 1983.
After serving as a top aide to Irish American Congressman Tip O’Neill, one of the most powerful men in Washington, Lew spent five years (1988–1993) in the private practice of law. He also worked as Executive Director of the Center for Middle East Research (for a year) and Director for the Democratic National Committee’s Campaign 88.
The so-called “Center for Middle East Research” is an enigma. It appears not to exist anymore. It’s completely unclear what, if anything, it was.
Between the Clinton and Obama Administrations Lew worked for New York University, where liberals say he played the part of a “union-buster” instrumental in ending graduate teaching students’ collective bargaining rights. (Who knew they had any?)
From 2006 to 2008 he worked as managing director and chief operating officer of Citi Global Wealth Management and Citi Alternative Investments at Citigroup on Wall Street.
There he oversaw, or helped oversee, a half-billion dollar “fund of hedge funds” that placed a significant portion of its assets with hedge fund manager John Paulson, who made a fortune when housing prices collapsed (he’d shorted the market). Despite Paulson’s English- or Scandinavian-sounding surname, the billionaire speculator is a Jew.
Even so, in the first three months of 2008 alone Lew’s unit lost more than half a billion dollars overall. Citigroup subsequently received $45 billion from TARP, the federally-funded bailout program for big banks, and issued an additional $64.6 billion in taxpayer-backed debt through an emergency Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) program.
Lew received a salary of $1.1 million from Citigroup and, two weeks before joining Obama’s State Department in 2009, an additional $944,578 bonus after the megabank received its enormous taxpayer bailout. Despite media inquiries, the bonus was concealed from the public until 2010.
Left-wing magazine Mother Jones’s (note: the preceding URL links to a David Horowitz website) brief 2012 account of Lew’s stint on Wall Street, written by Siddhartha Mahanta, was subsequently reworked to soften or remove criticism. A note appended to the article now states “This post was edited to more fairly reflect Lew’s policy record.” Several “progressive” Jews are now quoted to the effect that Lew’s Wall Street activities were blameless; it is also claimed that Lew enjoys “enduring popularity with Republicans.”
For more on Jacob Lew’s Citigroup tenure, see Shahien Nasiripour, “Jack Lew: Obama’s OMB Pick Oversaw Citigroup Unit That Shorted Housing Market,” HuffingtonPost.com, July 14, 2010.
“A Very Committed Jew”
Jewish Week wrote last year that in a private speech to an Orthodox congregation in the Bronx Lew once came out “very strongly” (though “with a great deal of respect”) against early release from prison for Jewish traitor Jonathan Pollard, who will be eligible for parole in two years.
While this stance, if true, is more positive than not, it speaks volumes about this country and its Jewish community that such a position is not the norm among American Jews.
Michael Miller, executive vice president of the Jewish Community Relations Council (a major pillar of organized Jewry in America), where Lew served on the board from 2004–2006, called him “a very committed Jew.”
Lew lit the menorah on the National Mall under the aegis of the American Friends of Lubavitch. Rabbi Levi Shemtov, head of the Chabad group, agrees that Lew is deeply committed to his Jewish identity. Unfortunately, similar public displays of Christianity are illegal or otherwise strictly verboten thanks primarily to the strenuous insistence of . . . Jews.
Lew is very close to the Jewish community and has served as a go-to person for Jews in Washington.
Ominously, anti-white civil liberties foe Abraham Foxman, National Director of the ADL, has praised Lew—which raises a red flag about his so-called “centrism.”
Equally disquieting is warm praise from racist Likud apparatchik and chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel Nathan Sharansky.
Lew, Sharansky said, has a “warm place in his heart that is reserved for Israel and Judaism.” Lew will not remain indifferent to Israel. “For him, it’s not just another country. His faith and bond with Israel and the Jewish people is an important part of his life.” Lew
is a man who’s open to Israel and the Middle East and has extensive knowledge on the subject. He has worked in this field for many years, and it’s always good [for Jews] to have someone who cares and is in the know. Lew is a great Israel supporter and has always taken upon himself to help us.
Even before he became Obama’s Chief of Staff—i.e., when he was with the OMB and other positions having nothing legitimate to do with Israel—his son studied at a yeshiva in that country and Lew maintained a “close working relationship” with Israel’s ambassador to the United States Michael Oren, and met several times with Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon and Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz.
As a youthful aide to Tip O’Neill, Lew was instrumental in pressuring the American government to move thousands of Jews out of Russia into the United States while millions of whites and Christians continued to rot in Communist prisons, concentration camps, poverty, and ignorance as they had since 1917. As always, only Jews mattered.
Double Standards
Like all Jewish government officials, Lew holds Jewish and Israeli interests in high regard. Despite his low-key approach, he is definitely an ethnic and religious partisan.
In sharp contrast, white and “Christian” officials never represent the interests of whites or Christians. They give them the back of their hand: they discriminate, suppress citizens’ God-given, Constitutional, and legal rights, and adhere to policies that are indisputably genocidal.
A genuine, traditional Christian officeholder, unlike an Orthodox Jew, would never be applauded by the press and politicians for his piety. He would be savagely vilified, and his career probably destroyed.
According to an Orthodox Jewish source, when Lew worked for President Clinton in 1999 as director of OMB he had permission to take every Saturday off.
Even in an emergency, he reportedly once refused to pick up the telephone to speak to Clinton—even as the President begged him to, over the answering machine—until receiving permission from his rabbi. “I know it is the Sabbath,” Clinton could be heard saying, according to an MSNBC report, “but this is urgent. G-d would understand.” Lew asked his rabbi for directions as to when he was permitted to talk on the phone on Shabbos, and he was told that when the President calls urgently, he was allowed to pick up.
The story sounds crazy enough to be true. Who’s the bigger clown, Lew or his servilely begging boss, the President of the United States? Both are equally ridiculous.
How fortunate for American liberals that Lew isn’t a religious whack job (i.e., a believing Christian) and therefore poses no threat to the separation of “church” and state. After all, as a Jew he’s chosen by God.
The next time the global economy is on the brink of collapse, however, the world won’t have Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to rely upon. Pious Jacob Lew might be taking the day off—unless his Orthodox rabbi interprets halakhah so as to permit him to do his job.
Jacob%20and%238220%3BJackand%238221%3B%20Lew%3AObamaand%238217%3Bs%20Nominee%20for%20Secretary%20of%20the%20Treasury
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
20 comments
The jewish media went ballistic with Chuck Hagel appointment:
Chuck Hagel and His Enemies : The New Yorker
” The American Israel Public Affairs Committee comes knocking with a pro-Israel letter, Hagel continued, and “then you’ll get eighty or ninety senators on it. I don’t think I’ve ever signed one of the letters”—because, he added, they were “stupid.” Hagel also said, “The Jewish lobby intimidates a lot of people up here,” but “I’m a United States senator. I’m not an Israeli senator.”
All the pictures disappear from the print versions of C-C articles lately (when I press “print this post” on the top right corner). Normally that doesn’t happen. Have you changed some settings?
I noticed this, too. I believe the capability may be restored at some point.
Thank you for chronicling all of this. It lets us know what we can expect from this individual – the exact same thing to expect from virtually everybody in the Beltway/media/academic three-headed monster: anti-white, pro-Jewish, multiculturalism destruction.
One component I find interesting is the “crypto-Jew” thing (here, regarding John Kerry). As creepy as the Jewish supremacists are, their propensity for pretending to be other people while secretly betraying those people and serving Jews is….a whole new level. Secrecy implies that you have something to hide. What are they hiding?
If there is a definitive (non Jewish) work on crypto Jews, please share. The John Kerry, Madeline Albright tales are chilling to the core.
David, I am unaware of any source that discusses the phenomenon in-depth in one place. The closest I am aware of is Kevin MacDonald, who has index entries in all three volumes of his trilogy to “Crypto-Judaism” and “Deception.” Probably the most extensive sections are found in Separation and Its Discontents (1998).
By the way, I watched your videos. Very interesting altogether. You have a good voice for audio/video work. I wish you luck in your endeavor.
Thanks for the praise and reply, Andrew. I am always looking for paid work with my computer animation and video editing, so please feel free to refer me to anybody you know who happens to need such work.
I’m definitely a reader of Kevin MacDonald’s work at TheOccidentalObserver, but I’ll (someday) check into his books on the works of crypto-Jews. There seem to be many great researchers nowadays in the pro-white movement (here, at TOO, AlternativeRight, and others) and so maybe somebody will knuckle down and do a great piece of research on the creepy crypto Jew tool. It is insidious and terrifying stuff.
I have a thought to consider. So much is being made of Hagel’ s appointment and what a defeat this supposedly represents for the Usual Suspects. As Hamilton alludes, probably not really. I suspect he’ s right. Has anyone scrutinized Hagel’ s actual voting record to see if he actually really ever deviates from the lobby’ s policy? That would be interesting to know. It seems the Israel Lobby has been trying to fall back into the shadows lately, to become less obnoxious in its power. Perhaps this appointment represents a sham defeat to lull us into a false sense of security.
He’s not a dual national? Everybody dance!
“The story sounds crazy enough to be true. Who’s the bigger clown, Lew or his servilely begging boss, the President of the United States? Both are equally ridiculous.”
Simple: as I’ve explained over and over, Whites/Conservatives are dumb, Jews/Liberals are crazy.
Clinton is stupid for falling for the whole “religious observance” malarkey. Judaism is a set of elaborate obsessive-compulsive disorders that are set aside tout suite as soon as any inconvenience arises — like a chance to swindle a goy. Does Clinton actually think Jew Lew needs to consult a rabbi to figure out if JHVH-1 would be OK with his answering the phone? That was a test, and Clinton flunked; what he should have done was fire his ass right there and then.
Between the name games and his loopy signature, I’d say this guy was pretty disturbed, and likely to blow at some point. I can only assume his appointment is meant to serve as a part of the Revelation of the Method — look at this clown, goyim, we can do anything we want!
Speaking of Revelation of the Method, for months now “conservative” hard-money bloggers have been mockingly referring to “John Law Bernanke” in reference to the Scottish Economist who, according to Wikipedia, “held that money creation will stimulate the economy, that paper money is preferable to metallic money which should be banned, and that shares are a superior form of money since they pay dividends”. He also created the first “bubble” but, in typical fashion, died in poverty after escaping France dressed as a woman — just as Jews dress up as Esther at the carnivalesque We Killed the Goyim festival, Purim.
And now we have the hitherto unknown “Jack Lew”. Coincidence? Only the goyim would ‘think’ so.
Clinton is stupid for falling for the whole “religious observance” malarkey. Judaism is a set of elaborate obsessive-compulsive disorders that are set aside tout suite as soon as any inconvenience arises — like a chance to swindle a goy. Does Clinton actually think Jew Lew needs to consult a rabbi to figure out if JHVH-1 would be OK with his answering the phone? That was a test, and Clinton flunked; what he should have done was fire his ass right there and then.
Yes.
Regarding crypto-Jews, there’s a short section on the Marranos in Léon de Poncins’ Judaism and the Vatican, which includes the following excerpts from Louis Massoutie’s Judaisme et Hitlérisme:
“Judaism reacted to other religions in many different ways, but the most extraordinary reaction of all . . . is undoubtedly what we will call the phenomenon of Marranism. This is what Werner Sombart has to say on the subject (p. 385): ‘The sudden increase in the numbers of pretended conversions of Jews to paganism, to the Moslem religion, to Christianity, is such an extraordinary phenomenon, such a unique event in the history of mankind, that we cannot fail to be astonished and dumbfounded every time we come to study it.'” (L. Massoutie: Judaisme et Hitlérisme, pp. 97-99)
“The Marranos were Spanish Jews in semblance converted to Christianity. It was from 1391 onwards and, according to [Heinrich] Graetz, following religious persecution, that many Jews in Spain decided to adopt the Catholic faith. There was nothing new in this because, long before them, their ancestors of the dispersion had already had recourse to this ruse, either to escape religious persecution, or for motives of sheer material gain.” (L. Massoutie, ibid., pp. 97-99)
“However that may be, while they ostensibly practised Catholicism the Marranos all the while secretly followed the rites of Judaism to which they had remained deeply attached. The Spanish people were not deceived as to the sincerity of the religious beliefs of the new Christians. With good reason the Spaniards were suspicious of them and called them Marranos, which means ‘accursed, damned’, or in popular language, ‘swine’. An extraordinary aspect of the situation and one which I admit I fail to understand is that the Marranos were not satisfied with zealously submitting to the authority of the Church; they went much further still and carried their deceit to extreme limits. Thus it was that many of them, both men and women, did not hesitate to enter religious orders — which they were in no way obliged to do — and became monks or nuns. What is more, Marranos became priests and even bishops. If Jewish historians themselves had not told us this, we could hardly believe it.
“We can understand why the Spanish people became angry when this was discovered; it was following this discovery that the Spanish Inquisition was set up.” (L. Massoutie, ibid., pp. 100-101)
“The struggle between the Inquisition and the Marranos went on for several centuries in the dark, an unparalleled, unexampled struggle, Graetz tells us, in which all the techniques of deceit and doggedness of purpose were pitted against accusations and cruelty.” (L. Massoutie, ibid., pp. 103-105)
“Protestantism had its Marranos, too. Secret Jews were numerous among the Protestant refugees of the seventeenth century at the time of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, as Werner Sombart tells us. In Germany for instance, we can rate the famous poet, Henry Heine, as a Protestant Marrano. Amazing as it may seem, this is how Graetz refers to Heine and to his co-religionist, Louis Boerne [i.e., Ludwig Börne, born Loeb Baruch], both of them converts to Protestantism. I quote from a passage in Geschichte der Juden, volume xi, page 368, which was omitted from the French translation by Moses Bloch:
“‘They were divorced from Judaism only superficially, like fighting men who put on the armour and colours of their enemy in order to strike him down and destroy him with greater certainty and vigour. What can one make of such behaviour by the sensitive author of the Intermezzo and the lively writer of the Reisebilder?'” (L. Massoutie, ibid., pp. 103-105)
“In a passage of his History of the Jews, Graetz tells us of Spanish and Portuguese Marranos who, behind the mask of Christianity and in the habit of monks, ‘jealously cherished the sacred flame of their paternal religion, and at the same time undermined the foundations of the powerful Catholic monarchy.’
“If it is only reasonable for a Jew not to give up his religion and even to preserve the worship of his race and ancestors secretly, all the while behaving as a loyal citizen in the land of his adoption, it is incomprehensible that he should take advantage of his French or German citizenship, for instance, to undermine the institutions and customs of his new fatherland; in other words, to overthrow everything. If the modern Jew was to carry out on a national level what the Marranos of old did in the field of religion, it would lead to countless disasters for Israel. Modern nations, thus irritated, would plunge into savage anti-Semitism and there would automatically arise a new Inquisition, of a different type to be sure, but one that would perhaps be more terrible than Torquemada’s.
“In my opinion, if Israel wants to avoid the worst catastrophes, it is in her interest to work in the open. Unfortunately, dissimulation is an age-old habit of hers and even the most pro-Semitic writers, such as Anatole Leroy-Beaulieu, find themselves obliged to admit it.” (L. Massoutie, ibid., pp. 114-15)
Thanks for that info. I know some people like to say ‘evolutionary strategy’ but c’mon… tell me there isn’t some kind of supernatural- demonic element at play.
Yeah, thanks for all that effort, WR. Although it’s so troubling to the soul, that I almost wish you HADN’T shared that.
“Lies, deceit, creating mistrust are his ways, now.” -Yoda talking about Sith Lords.
Who lies, deceives, and creates divisions more than these Jewish Supremacists. It is not merely a tactic, it seems to be their defining trait. As the Mossad says, “By way of deception, we shall conquer.”
Unbelievable evil. Perhaps this, the Communist revolution and their slaughter of gentiles, and their creation of porn and mass perversion are the most head-slapping evils that I’ve learned of Jews. (Of course, I’m not a Palestinian, or else I’d likely have many other things to add to my list!)
I think I remember reading, maybe in a comment here, that Julius Evola or some other right esotericist thought Jews were an Earthly vessel for evil powers that operate on a metaphysical level.
Jews have always claimed direct descent from the Pharisees of which Jesus said:
You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
In the Garden of Eden story, Satan lies to Eve to convince her to bite the appeal. Taking this allegory on its own terms, it suggests that evil is bound up with lies and deceit — a Jewish speciality. The Jews and their lies (Luther). The great master of lies (Schopenhaur). By way of deception, that shall do war (Mossad). I like the gospel formulation best. Lies are the Jews’ native language whereas for our people lies are a source of shame. Among our people, only the sociopaths are comfortable lying.
Michael Hoffman made this observation about the esoteric angle and social control:
The issue of controlling humanity with esoteric words and symbols encoded within a play, a media spectacular or a ritual is one of the most difficult for people to comprehend. That is why most people are viewed with utter contempt as “cowans,” “the profane,” the “gentiles” and the “goyim” (cattle) by secret society initiates. “I think we are farmed,” Charles Fort said of humanity. It was Fort who also suggested that man deliberately invented the dogma of materialism in order to shield himself from the evidence of what was being done to him by means of psycho- spiritual warfare methods hyped by “coincidence,” symbolism and ritual.”
– Michael Hoffman, Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare
This notion that the elite regard people as animals to be “farmed” squares pretty well with the expressed sentiments of the elite themselves. Example:
“The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
“In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.”
– Zbigniew Brzezinski
I have no doubt Bolshevik style bloodletting against whites is their end game.
I recall that Joseph Goebbels wrote in Michael: “The Jew is the lie personified.”
“Protestantism had its Marranos, too. Secret Jews were numerous among the Protestant refugees of the seventeenth century at the time of the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, as Werner Sombart tells us.”
And when some of them later came back to France, in the 19th century, and found their way to the top positions, especially in the education ministry, they would simply say that they had German protestant origins. It’s the same strategy as in the Coneheads movie: Conehead aliens know that they don’t look like typical Americans… So, when asked about that, they just keep replying that they are French.
Andrew Hamilton writes: “How fortunate for American liberals that Lew isn’t a religious whack job (i.e., a believing Christian) and therefore poses no threat to the separation of ‘church’ and state.” To use a bon mot of the veteran French nationalist Pierre Sidos, what we really need is the separation of synagogue and state.
“Another is US Senator John Kerry (D.-Mass.) to be Secretary of State. Kerry’s father, a crypto-Jew who passed as an Irish Catholic”
John Kerry’s cousin Brice Lalonde (born Lévy), was a government minister in France in the 1990s. The French environmentalist political movement was taken over by the Jews in the 1990s, and Brice Lalonde tried to develop his image as a right wing environmentalist, even though he was in a socialist government. As the French “Greens” turned into loony leftists (led by Jews), he became the government’s reasonable environmentalist.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.