1,805 words
Part 1
Today on the Right, there is much discussion of religion in the West, and for good reason. Whether we are talking about reactionaries who wish to wind back the clock to Protestantism, Catholicism, Paganism, or esoteric Traditionalism—or futurists looking forward to a new Nietzschean or vitalist dispensation—just about everyone on the Right has some position (or positions, often contradictory) on religion and its relationship to Rightist politics.
Christianity is by far the most relevant religion among the Right in America. It may even be more relevant amongst the classical liberals masquerading as the Right, that is Republicans, than it is among the Dissident Right. There is a good, a bad, and an ugly to Christianity that should be explored if we are to have a full view of the religio-political situation. The good, from a Rightist perspective, is obvious. Christianity is the religion of white people and has been for over 1,500 years in Southern Europe and a bit shorter time in Northern Europe, although in some places Christianity is less than a 1,000 year tradition. For this reason, Christianity is the default “trad” position. Christianity has brought us great works of literature, from St. Augustine’s Confessions and The City of God, all the way to Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings in the modern era. Nearly every piece of great Western art has Christ as its context. Mozart’s Requiem is an unfinished Requiem Mass. Michelangelo’s David was, well, David. It goes on and on. There is no West as we know it without Christianity.
For over 1,000 years, Christianity was a religion in which only the priestly caste read the Bible. It is with good reason that they kept this a secret and, rather than translating it for the masses, would give them rules and dogmas that were indispensable for managing a working society, while still being relatively in keeping with the Bible. When one actually reads the Bible, one can imagine the horror that must have afflicted the clergy when the Gutenberg Bible began being manufactured. To this day, Catholics are mocked for not reading the Bible, preferring to go to Mass for religious guidance. I have heard Catholics say that reading the Bible “harms the soul” if not guided by a teacher who knows the true meaning of the passages. What I found when I read the Bible confirmed this. There is a reason a Traditionalist cannot read the Bible nakedly.
The bad of Christianity is quite simple: it isn’t true, at least not literally, but it claims to be literally true. I don’t wish to delve too much into this because it is trite and, dare I say, Reddit to do so. Suffice it to say that the wonder of Christ’s Passion dies away when you read Revelation and find that, behind all the hooplah is a band of homeless anarchists expecting the return any day for their cope personified to smite the evil doers . . . a cope that still hasn’t arrived. I still remember the feeling of disappointment reading Revelation 22:7 for the first time, that “I am coming soon! Blessed is the one who keeps the words of the prophecy written in this scroll.” Maybe “soon” can be interpreted in different ways but it seems pretty clear to me that, in this context, “soon” shouldn’t be longer than the duration between Abraham and Jesus. The first century Christians certainly did not think so, expecting the Second Coming literally any day. If you wish to keep your faith, do not go poking around this thorny bramble!
Another issue that I came across is that the Bible, specifically the Old Testament, is boring. When I say boring, keep in mind that I read Spengler’s Decline of the West cover to cover over a couple weeks. The furthest I’ve ever gotten is Deuteronomy, even skipping the lists of laws. It really is that boring. I’m told the stories of King David are interesting, and I wish I could confirm or deny this. Alas, the stories which are a deep part of our cultural roots — Samson, David, Jonah, etc. — could not motivate me past the sixth book.
This is not a theology issue. It’s an ancient Jewish issue. Homer’s epics, Hesiod’s Works and Days, the Bhagavad Gita, the Upanishads, and the Patanjali Yoga Sutras are some of the most interesting and enjoyable books I have ever read. They are rich, exciting, full of wisdom, and interact with the Indo-European spirit in a way that puts into perspective the fact that hardly anyone of European descent had ever actually read the Bible before the early modern era.
The ugly of Christianity should be no surprise: its Jewish origins. There has been a constant project to retcon this among those who are critical of Jewish influence in society. I myself grappled with this when I was Catholic. The ways that Christianity and Judaism are decoupled are generally quite silly. There was the Positive Christianity movement in Nazi Germany which combined Nazi ideology with Christianity, attempting to distance itself from the Jewish origins of Christianity and even the Bible itself. Later on, the Christian Identity movement claimed that White people are the true Jews of the Old Testament and that Jesus was in fact only preaching to the Jews — it’s just that by “Jews” he meant Europeans and Jesus was actually a White Nationalist. This motif goes back even further, perhaps centuries, to the British Israelism which gained prominence in the 19th Century but traces its origins even farther back, ironically to the era in which people began reading the Bible en masse — the early modern period. Not only are these ideologies demonstrably false but they excuse all the excesses of Jewry by claiming that their actions against other races and religious groups would actually be justified if they were the true Jews. In that case, how can you blame the Jews for their genocidal actions in the Holodomor and Palestine and their nefarious use of institutions to assault white hegemony? If they believe they are truly the Chosen People then their only sin is ignorance. It’s all very silly indeed.
This attempt to wave away the Jewish roots of Christianity continues today in the “based” Christianity of the Dissident Right. Many claim that Jesus was not a Jew and was in fact an antisemite for speaking out against the Jewish project of his time. By this standard, Theodor Herzl was an antisemite! (This claim has actually been made.) Yet even these people have failed to shake the Old Testament stories. I suppose they consider the Jewish heroes to be Christian as they all led up to Christ. Does this mean that Jews acting in Jewish ways was fine until Jesus said not to? They are a people who considered and continue to consider all other races, including Europeans, to be subhuman. To take people like these as heroes, people who thought of your ancestors as inferior, is problematic and uncomfortable. Ultimately, I was unable to see this issue clearly until I cleansed my palette of all Jewish influence, including Agnus Dei.
But European civilization would not be where it is at today if Christianity were incompatible with the European drive to expand, to discover, and ultimately to achieve great things. European man did not need to concoct complicated theories to decouple the new European religion from Judaism. The doctrines of peace did not prevent the aristocracy from forming a warrior code, incorporating Christian aspects, but far more pagan than Christian. It did not stop the conquistadors from turning proselytization into conquest. It did not stop Rome from hybridizing their Pantheon with Christianity, nor did it stop the rebellious Germanic spirit from doing what it does best — fighting the authority of the Romans. Christianity’s skepticism of science did not stop the Scientific Revolution. Europe achieved all of this neither because of nor in spite of Christianity, because Christianity was always more of an aesthetic for European man than a philosophy. It is certainly the aesthetics and history that are converting so many on the Right to Christianity today, specifically Traditional Latin Mass Catholicism and Orthodoxy. I don’t think “turn the other cheek” and “the meek shall inherit the earth” are converting young and politically energetic men to religion.
Objectively, in their heart of hearts, their code is more like Ragnar Readbeard’s. European man had a way of thinking and rationalized it through Christianity post hoc, no matter how contradictory the actions were with Jesus’ teachings. It is only now in our over-intellectual age that we make the mistake of taking religion per se too seriously, searching for meaning to counter the nihilism of progress and atheism. But within the fruit of greater religious understanding is the seed of destruction — the realization that this grand and beautiful cathedral, our cathedral, which has taken centuries to build, was in fact built on a foundation of sand.
With all this in mind, we have to ask ourselves if this religion is viable for a forward-thinking Right which wishes to reach out toward centuries, perhaps millennia. Is Christianity compatible with Right-wing thought in an era where people are not illiterate serfs and when the Right is not associated with following authority but questioning it? The Bible has much wisdom. If it didn’t, it could hardly continue to live on 2,000 years later. But its story is a bit of a hard sell if we are to treat it objectively. Perhaps all great civilizations require a noble lie. But what happens when the lie is no longer believable, or worse, not really noble? Do we double down? Fake it ’til you make it? I don’t think so. While the aesthetics of European Christianity will always influence Western Civilization, even into the stars, its historical claims are highly dubious, as are its moral teachings.
Nietzsche said that “God is dead” at the height of Christian European civilization, the mid-19th Century. What did he mean by this? He did not say that Christianity was dead but God, specifically the Yahweh-Yeshua of the Bible. This God was no longer a real force, when before it was no less real than your front porch or your dog. (The same happened in the late Roman Empire. It was quite hard to believe that the Roman emperor was literally the god Sol Invictus. A universal God that seemed consistent with a highly renowned Platonic philosophy, on the other hand, seemed more reasonable as a religion.) But it was real. To believe that it will be “real” again in its same form, to believe that it is “real” even among the most ardent of believers today, is living in fantasy land. It is not until something, a “god” if you will, is this real that there will be a solution to the question of religion. Until then, every man a LARPer!
32 comments
Whites are nowhere mentioned in the Bible. In the Christian religion we do not exist.
Jews do exist. Jews are the collective subject of Christianity’s sacred history.
Though in long-gone days the animal spirits of White might have overcome the strong innate preference of Christianity, when modern Christianity weighs the interests of the Jews against the interests of Whites it weighs something against nothing and decides against us Whites.
The religious hatred of the Archbishop of Canterbury against Whites who objected to a brown man slaughtering innocent White girls shows what this means in real terms. The authoritative interpreters of Christianity think Whites have no legitimate interests, not even an interest in a future for our children.
We can’t live like this. We are dying out, we are withering, with our churches cursing us all the way to death.
We don’t get to choose whether we will continue to live with Christianity; Christianity has decided that it will no longer live with us.
Great comment! I just wanted to offer a little white pill. White fertility is stabilising!
https://imperiumpress.substack.com/p/fertility-collapse-winners-and-losers-a69?utm_source=publication-search
Well said.
What use is a religion if it’s not synonymous with the survival & best interests of its people. There is but one option going forward, an ideology that places our best interests as a central theme. Anything less than that & we go extinct.
XIV VERBA
Christianity is a mind virus that is killing its host. The virtues of Western Civilization were, and remain, the vestiges of classical (“pagan”) culture.
The arc of Christian history is now reaching is zenith, as Western Man begins to take seriously the command to “love your enemy” and “pray for those who spitefully use you.” Xenophilia, coupled with the culture of critique, is the natural extrapolation of Jehovah’s command that all races are equal (Galatians 3:28, for example), and Marxism – accurately described as ‘Christianity for atheists’ – is the lever by which the agents of the meek are attempting to inherit the earth.
Your ethnic, ancestral faith beckons to you. Reclaim your birthright; it is not too late.
On the other hand, maybe Christian civilization is well past its prime, perhaps ending in 1913 but we are now into it’s echo. Spengler calls it the second religiousness. If that is the case, for people who have Christian community and find it a deep part of their lives, wouldn’t it make sense for them to choose the sterner passages from the Bible. For example, “Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before pigs, or they will trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.” Matthew 7:6
“If that is the case, for people who have Christian community and find it a deep part of their lives, wouldn’t it make sense for them to choose the sterner passages from the Bible.”
I continue to find much that is wise and valuable in Christianity, for example this:
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
Our priests and ministers have no love for White people; that’s why their words are of no use to us.
The fatal problem is that there are those with authority and those without it, those who interpret scripture and tradition in a binding way and those who do not, and the settled consensus of modern Christian authorities is antiwhite.
You or I can have a private opinion that the Archbishop of Canterbury is wrong or that Pope Francis is wrong. It means nothing. They have authority and we don’t. Their hearts, cold as tundra, incline to the destruction of our race, and there is nothing we can do about it.
Charity, too, is an ongoing part of the problem. The West has emptied its coffers in the fool’s errand of White Saviorism; we grow weaker and poorer while subsidizing, CAUSING, the exploding birth rates of peoples who openly despise us.
Want to advocate turning over the tables of the money lenders? You have my full support. Charity, though? For Americans, sure. South Africans? We give to them too. Anybody else? No. Charity should begin -and end – with our own.
These antiwhite “charities” of the churches are as though false shepherds were taking contributions from their sheep to fund programs to breed more wolves and to relocate them to wherever there were sheep to eat.
The fatal problem is that there are those with authority and those without it, those who interpret scripture and tradition in a binding way and those who do not,
Is that so? Did someone reconstitute the Spanish Inquisition and forget to tell me about it?
and the settled consensus of modern Christian authorities is antiwhite.
And the settled consensus of modern non-Christian authorities is what? There are many problems with this anti-Christian scapegoating, but what stands out to me here is the apparent assumption that Whites are naturally very racially conscious and proud, but reluctantly back down when their Christian leaders remind them that this is some sort of sin. This is nonsense. Whites are not racially conscious, and no, that is not because of Christianity. Different formulations of the Golden Rule are found in various faiths all over the world, and people take it for what it is: a rough and ready, common-sense moral guideline that makes the world go ’round.
Some Christians are racially conscious, of course, and they’re not letting clerics talk them out of it. They go to a different church, stop going altogether, or just ignore their pastor. After all, if “Christian authorities” actually had any authority, 80% of evangelicals wouldn’t have voted for the Avatar of Hitler.
I have to say, sometimes I get the impression that anti-Christian Whites in the movement just aren’t really WN in the way that Christians are. The Bible says that whoever doesn’t care for “his own” is worse than an infidel. (1 Timothy 5:8) Anti-Whites wave this off as irrelevant, but why? They do believe that your White racial extended family is included in “your own,” or don’t they?
There is a distinction which must be realized and that is between original christian philosophy and principles,, and the many christian sects, institutions, under the many different self serving titles which followed all the way to the modern political evangelical, who is viewed by many as the final phenomenal mutant. The principles of the messiah’s whether they be Christ, Mohamed, Buddha, basically preached love, brotherhood, charity, peace and inner peace. I find nothing wrong with this principle or how its concept can be used to overpower and shadow one group over another. Even scripture can be distanced, contradictory, distorted and confusing at times with all their amendments. I would at times poke fun at my very religious mom and say “The only reason the Jews were God’s chosen people was because they wrote the book before the Calabrese”.
accurately described as ‘Christianity for atheists’
I’m pretty broad-minded when it comes to figuring out who is and who is not a Christian. I’m totally fine with Christian agnostics (I’m not sure God exists, the Christian God is the genuine article.) But I’m afraid I have to draw the line at atheists. You can’t be an atheist of any sort and be a Christian, and there is no such thing as “Christianity for atheists.”
But then, we know how people equivocate to get the upper hand in an argument.
From Through the Looking Glass:
“That’s a great deal to make one word mean,” Alice said in a thoughtful tone.
“When I make a word do a lot of work like that,” said Humpty Dumpty, “I always pay it extra.”
“Oh!” said Alice. She was too much puzzled to make any other remark.
The point here is to single out Christianity despite the fact that literally every institution of White society is thoroughly cucked, and Christians are the least anti-White demographic in America.
What a great essay!
🙂
Until this essay I hadn’t thought about how even the David is ultimately a sculpture of a Jew…
If they are the chosen people, what does that make white Christians?
It is pathetic to see the subservience of my people towards an execrable group of desert thieves. This hanging of the heads, this sentimentalism…plus this belief in the superiority of the after life is the greatest trick. Sublimate your desires and your battle on this earth for the hereafter, leaving the spoils for the parasites alive today. I look at my uncle and aunt, and my cousins, and I can see them sheathing their swords every time they spout their scripture. Sure, it brings them comfort, but at what cost? We must build upon something more true. There are greater stories still to tell.
Tye: November 29, 2024 Until this essay I hadn’t thought about how even the David is ultimately a sculpture of a Jew… If they are the chosen people, what does that make white Christians?
—
Go back to admiring Michelangelo’s sculpture for his genius as an artist, sculpting an idealized human out of a block of marble, not “David,” the Yid, for his overseer.
Michelangelo greatly exaggerated his figures of men and women, adding dynamic muscle, altering proportions, and adding bulk to the figure. Michelangelo created small sculpture models first, then would create larger works, and he was only 26 when he received that commission [from the Church}. His work though in most everything has significantly exaggerated figures with very defined musculature.
—
It is pathetic to see the subservience of my people towards an execrable group of desert thieves. This hanging of the heads, this sentimentalism…plus this belief in the superiority of the afterlife is the greatest trick. Sublimate your desires and your battle on this earth for the hereafter, leaving the spoils for the parasites alive today. I look at my uncle and aunt, and my cousins, and I can see them sheathing their swords every time they spout their scripture. Sure, it brings them comfort, but at what cost? We must build upon something more true. There are greater stories still to tell.
—
Christian Secor’s essay is excellent. Perhaps in part two he will offer the logical spiritual alternative to Christianity for our race — specifically William Pierce’s Cosmotheism that is not only grounded in reality, but in science and the eternal laws of Nature, rather than to ancient, imaginary Jewish spooks up in the sky.
—
C.S.: The bad of Christianity is quite simple: it isn’t true…The ugly of Christianity should be no surprise: its Jewish origins…This is not a theology issue. It’s an ancient Jewish issue…
Later on, the Christian Identity movement claimed that White people are the true Jews of the Old Testament and that Jesus was in fact only preaching to the Jews — it’s just that by “Jews” he meant Europeans and Jesus was actually a White Nationalist… If they believe they are truly the Chosen People then their only sin is ignorance. It’s all very silly indeed… This attempt to wave away the Jewish roots of Christianity continues today in the “based” Christianity of the Dissident Right. Many claim that Jesus was not a Jew and was in fact an antisemite for speaking out against the Jewish project of his time…
Christianity’s skepticism of science did not stop the Scientific Revolution. Europe achieved all of this neither because of nor in spite of Christianity, because Christianity was always more of an aesthetic for European man than a philosophy… Objectively, in their heart of hearts, their code is more like Ragnar Readbeard’s. European man had a way of thinking and rationalized it through Christianity post hoc, no matter how contradictory the actions were with Jesus’ teachings…
Is Christianity compatible with Right-wing thought in an era where people are not illiterate serfs and when the Right is not associated with following authority but questioning it? … [I]ts story is a bit of a hard sell if we are to treat it objectively. Perhaps all great civilizations require a noble lie. But what happens when the lie is no longer believable, or worse, not really noble? Do we double down? Fake it ’til you make it? I don’t think so. While the aesthetics of European Christianity will always influence Western Civilization, even into the stars, its historical claims are highly dubious, as are its moral teachings…
Nietzsche… did not say that Christianity was dead but God, specifically the Yahweh-Yeshua of the Bible… To believe that it will be “real” again in its same form, to believe that it is “real” even among the most ardent of believers today, is living in fantasy land. It is not until something, a “god” if you will, is this real that there will be a solution to the question of religion.
—
With Christian’s negative conclusions that I’ve singled out above from his excellent analysis, if I were him I’d go down to the courthouse and change my “Christian name” to something more suitable.
Race and religion, my two favorite topics, address both what Christian says about how Whites following Christian beliefs “are living in a fantasy world until something, a ‘god’ if you will [offers] a solution to the question of religion — as well as Tyre’s, “We must build upon something more true.”
What we must preserve is our gene pool, not “Western Civilization.” That’s lost. So is America as we knew it. It’s lost also. We’re no longer “Right-Wing.” We are strict race-thinkers, race preservationists, something right-wingers are not.
Political organizations are transitory — they come and they go. Religions take centuries to take hold and are long-lasting. Look at Christianity. I note that C-C and the “movement” seem to pooh-pooh Cosmotheism, but to more serious race thinkers who have had enough of the rabbi Jesus and Jew-spawned Christianity they are looking at the philosophy, the belief system founded by Dr. William Pierce for our people. An excellent piece during this co-opted “Christmas” season is explained in this week’s American Dissident Voices broadcast: New Year’s Dawn Traditional Message, part 1 | National Vanguard
THE NEW YEAR is upon us. It inspires thoughts of where we’ve been, how we got there, and where we’re going.
1800 years ago, the Roman Emperor Aurelian first declared 25 December to be a state holiday, commemorating the Solstice — the rebirth of what he called Sol Invictus or “the Unconquerable Sun.” This is something that had long been sacred to Aryan peoples of many nations; Aurelian chose a specific date and made it official. He did this in hopes of establishing a new religious unity among Roman citizens.
If you’ve been reading National Vanguard for more than a few years, you already know that the three holidays we have this time of year — 1) the Solstice; 2) the day that the modern world calls “Christmas” and I call by the much more ancient name of Yuletide; and 3) New Year’s Day — are all really the same ancient holiday. The dates have been spread apart by a little more than a week because of calendar drift, the fact that ancient measurements suggested the “Sun stood still” for several days, cultural amalgamation, and the simple human desire for separate or distinctive holidays for various and usually temporary purposes. Nevertheless, they are all essentially the same holiday, all ultimately deriving from the return of the Sun to Europe and environs, as it begins its upward arc toward the ancient Aryan homelands of the Northern Hemisphere. We are a sky-focused and horizon-focused people.
Poor Aurelian! He and his holiday are seldom remembered now, even by residents of Orleans, France and New Orleans, Louisiana, cities that bear his name. He was trying to renew religion within a society that had become culturally chaotic and less Roman with the coming of the years of Empire, a society where Middle Eastern cults and superstitions were gaining a foothold, a society where it seemed that just yesterday the timeless myths of Europe still inspired, and had evolved into a poetic framework undergirding the greatest philosophical systems the world had ever seen. But within a single century, one Middle Eastern cult, a certain sect of the Jewish-derived cult of Christianity, would come to dominate Rome and all Europe, exterminate all the competing Christian cults, and even gain state, and eventually super-state, power. It closed the Aryan philosophic schools, banned our people’s indigenous religions, and wiped out many centuries’ worth of science, culture, literature, and art. The cult even hijacked December 25th, and “Easter” too — which originally had zero to do with Rabbi Jesus.
When our people chose — or, in many cases, were forced into — Christianity, that was a stumbling off the Path. For 1,700 years we’ve been going down the wrong path, a path far worse than a blind alley — a path that leads to death for our people.
But what is the Path, which Dr. William Pierce graced with a capital “P” — the right path, the Upward Path?
No one denies that Christianity as it exists today — after it was somewhat Aryanized by being the dominant religion of Europe, and (more or less) only Europe for many centuries — does teach some healthy values. It teaches responsibility and honesty. It opposes self-indulgence and degeneracy. It teaches kindness (though this requires ignoring large parts of the Bible). It teaches reverence for the family union (again, they have to ignore some Bible teachings to do that, but they are masters at selective reading and doublespeak). Like all religions, it teaches that there is a higher purpose to our lives than mere material advantage. At times, it has even campaigned against the worst excesses of the Jews, our race’s implacable enemies.
But let’s examine these good things more closely…
Read the rest of Kevin Strom’s part 1 at the link above. Part 2 will be next week’s ADV broadcast.
Link?
Tye: January 5, 2025
Link?
—
It’s buried in my comment to you: https://nationalvanguard.org/2025/01/new-years-dawn-traditional-message-part-1/
Here’s the second half of that ADV:
…But let’s examine these good things more closely.
Now teaching responsibility and honesty is undoubtedly a good thing. But young people, especially the brightest young people, want to know why they are being asked to behave and believe in a certain way. All that Christianity can say is be responsible and honest “because Rabbi Jesus says so.” This is merely a way of avoiding the question, and the best and brightest people can see that, so such an answer is the beginning of disenchantment and possibly even depression for them. The correct Cosmotheist answer is: “Be responsible because our people are depending on you to more than pull your own weight so we can advance the next generation 1) to survival itself and 2) further along the Upward Path of understanding and upward evolution. You are a link in a sacred evolutionary chain that reaches the beginning of Life at one end and Life’s great destiny at the other. You must be responsible so that our kind will reach that destiny. Your role is profoundly important. You must be honest — to all but our race’s enemies — so that your leaders, and your fellow members of our Cosmotheist and racial communities, will be better able to apprehend reality as it truly is and not be diverted by lies away from their sacred mission, which is also your mission.”
When teaching young people to be kind, the Christian church makes no distinction whatever between 1) helping those of our own Folk who, through no fault (or forgivable faults) of their own, have fallen on difficult times, and 2) helping aliens who want more resources to better facilitate the invasion and replacement of our own people. The correct Cosmotheist teaching would very definitely make such a distinction! — and see helping hostile aliens as, not kindness, but a sin against Life and the Creator, a horrible evil, to help in any way those who seek to harm us and thereby also depriving the deserving among our own Folk. Young people would be stirred and inspired by such a teaching and would respect such truthful answers!
When teaching young people to revere and respect the family union, once again the Christian religion can only justify said teaching by saying that Jesus said so, so don’t be unfaithful, don’t neglect your spouse or your children, and do your duty with respect to them. We Cosmotheists say to young folks: “The family is sacred, as it is the institution upon which our community is built — through the family new generations are born and raised — without it we could not even possibly exist — without it, no upward evolution is possible; the future of our community — and, in part, of all Life — literally depends upon you and your future spouse and your children. Your joy of love is sacred because it leads us to our future. Do not fail in this. You must not fail!” And the Christian makes no distinction between a marriage between a White man and White woman (which has the potential to create part of the next generation of our Folk), and a “marriage” between a brown Filipina or Mestiza and a White man; or the “marriage” of a White woman and her subsequent coupling with a non-White male. The Christian churches even bless and hold “sacred” such unnatural unions, which produce no White children and further blur the distinctions which Nature’s God has made — and is still making — between the races.
Likewise also with admonitions against degeneracy. The Christians, having no real overarching reason to condemn, say, homosexuality except “the Bible says we mustn’t!” are increasingly abandoning their opposition to sexual perversion, much to the happiness of Jews, who not only viscerally delight in all that is perverse and profanes the sacred, but who also see it as a most excellent way to prevent White births. Cosmotheism, on the other hand, teaches our young folks that their natural sexual instincts are good, even holy, and that they have deep purposes — the creation of new White souls, the bond of a man and woman to face life together and be part of our community together, and all the joys that that brings — and are not to be trifled with, not to be commercialized, not to be cheapened, and not to be perverted into other channels.
Furthermore, all such teachings of the Christian churches depend on the authority of a Jewish rabbi who gets his authority from the Jewish tribal god, who, we are told, is also the one true god of the Universe to the exclusion of all others. Thus, even the increasingly rare Christian churches who dare to question the policies of our Jewish misrulers always hold back to some extent. They dare not openly declare Jehovah’s people to be our enemies, though such a statement is 100 per cent. true, because they also consider themselves to be Jehovah’s people. With microscopically small exceptions, they see Jews as somehow especially “holy” and special and deeply connected to their shared “holy book.” This spiritual and mental slavery really is a huge impediment — probably the greatest impediment — to our people properly taking up the fight against those who are trying to kill us as a race.
And, along with all of these other deficits, Christianity also requires us to believe in things that are palpably not true, like 90 per cent. of the tales in the Hebrew Bible on which it is based. This leads to a stunting of mental growth among millions of our folk, who have become hopelessly superstitious Jew-worshippers largely due to childhood inculcation with Bible teachings. Among some even some quite intelligent folk, the contradictions between “Bible truth” and observed reality can lead to actual mental derangement. Among millions more, it leads to institutionalized hypocrisy on a gigantic scale, with decent citizens feeling they must pretend to believe in nonsense just to avoid the horrific anarchy, crime, and terminal social instability that might accompany disbelief among the masses.
Like hundreds of millions of European-descended people born after the Renaissance, I too realized as I became a man and became familiar with the discoveries of science that the Bible, in the light of what we knew about history and about the Universe, could not possibly be true. This hard and difficult truth desperately needs to be known by our people so they can find a better way. Thus the organized atheists and agnostics and skeptics do us all a good service when they show us how ridiculous the Abrahamic religions are.
But the atheists and agnostics and skeptics do us — on average, there are exceptions — a disservice when they give us as a substitute for the Abrahamic creeds either nothing — which leads to such dead ends for our people as libertarianism, the Jewess Ayn Rand’s “Objectivism,” anarcho-capitalism, and the like — or give us just a vague faith in “doing good,” or “helping others,” or a confused “humanism,” or an even more confused Communism, all of which are essentially just Christianity without miracles and without Rabbi Jesus — and none of the futures to which they lead us are ones in which White people survive.
And that is the key to everything.
Cosmotheism gives truthful answers to frank questions from the questing souls of young White men and young White women. We give answers that deserve — and receive — respect. We offer purpose for their lives. Purpose that inspires for a lifetime. Purpose that banishes despair. And we help them cast off the mental blinders and spiritual chains of doctrines that preach “equality” — doctrines that teach them that there is nothing special about them — that they in fact are the most evil and worthless people that ever lived, or are at the very least “wretches” who need to be saved by a Jewish “messiah.” We teach them the opposite of that. We teach them that they are indeed very special, the most precious people on this planet, people who are especially needed if the Creator’s Purpose is to be fulfilled, people without whom there would be nothing. And that is not only the exact truth, but it is also the message that young Whites need to hear. Start telling it every chance you get!
I will be continuing this important message next week, right here on American Dissident Voices.
I guess historically this turning another cheek never really went in the way of Christian nations defending themselves against foreign invasion. Maybe the only exception I can think of were the last stages of Roman empire. Mainly the non violence ideology was only reserved for the in-group. Like it was of benefit for any people not to kill each other in unnecessary conflicts and to settle them peacefully. In fact we would prefer the same among White nations today (see Uckraine vs Rossia).
Read Bible as it is, without adding to it your wishful thinking. Jesus proposed non-violence in all matters, be it against your own enemies or the enemies of your nation. More than this, Jesus rejects the very idea of a nation or race. He asserts the militant universalism according to which any biological or social distinctions are meaningless in the eyes of his god. The modern LGBT and woke movements are much closer to the true original Christianity than the half-wit right-wingers, seeking in Christianity their ideological foundation.
Jesus was actually quite Jewish supremacist when addressing the Canaanite woman with the “demon-possessed” child. That scripture didn’t seal the deal against Christianity for me, it was other things. I can understand Nathan Damingo and Morrakiu’s railing against Christianity as a Jewish derived cult just from that passage though. I guess some would see his earthly works as human and culture bound while his death and provision of atonement were divine and universalist.
Yes, I remember this passage well. In Jesus’ eyes the “sons of Israel” are the only humans and all others are dogs.
Christianity is a worship of Jews, regardless whether Christians themselves know it or not. Jews are the only humans; all others are slaves, equal and meaningless. The only value of a slave is to be obedient and useful to his master. When the alien woman grovels before Jesus, acknowledges her lowly dog-status and begs him for help, he graciously condescends to her pleas.
If there are people who like to be in the position of this Canaanite woman, let them go this way.
Bible is a compendium of fables from various tribes. These disparate fables were arranged in such a way as to serve as a historic justification to Jewish claims for supreme status. We need to read Bible as any other ancient literature. People who ascribe to Bible any divine status are mentally ill and unfit for any serious work in our field.
White Nationalism is the only religion any White Nationalist needs.
White nationalism is not a religion, Wimpy; It’s a very large tent that welcomes any White of any faith, or no faith at all.
My piece about Cosmotheism, above, is for the more intelligent among us who can wrap their minds around the belief system. Some here on C-C will eventually come to see that.
This is an important topic that should receive more attention before comments are closed.
—
Hamburger Today: December 2, 2024 White Nationalism is the only religion any White Nationalist needs.
Whether or not White Nationalism is a religion or not at least partially hinges on what you think ‘religion’ is (or means).
‘Religion’ comes to us from the Latin religio, whose root is ‘-lig-‘ meaning ‘to bind’. Thus, ‘religion’ is what binds. But binds what to what? In the case of White Nationalism as a religion, ‘White Nationalism’ binds Whites to Whites via the doctrine of ‘Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason‘.
As you indicate, ‘Cosmotheism’ isn’t for every White, but only ‘for the more intelligent among us’.
That doesn’t sound like a religion for Whites in general, but a cult for ‘the elect’.
White Nationalism as ‘Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason‘ is the only religion – a binding Whites to each other – that Whites need.
Everything flows from Whites embracing this ethos, this self-concept, this affective order of meaning.
Any part of ‘White Nationalism’ that purports to separate Whites from each other, to elevate one White over another on principle, isn’t really a White Nationalism suitable for the present task of bringing Whites together nor is it suitable for the long haul where Whites will have to confront the facts of mass non-White invasion and colonization by a jewish-supremacist ruling order.
Hamburger Today: January 31, 2025 Whether or not White Nationalism is a religion or not at least partially hinges on what you think ‘religion’ is (or means).
‘Religion’ comes to us from the Latin religio, whose root is ‘-lig-‘ meaning ‘to bind’. Thus, ‘religion’ is what binds. But binds what to what? In the case of White Nationalism as a religion, ‘White Nationalism’ binds Whites to Whites via the doctrine of ‘Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason‘.
As you indicate, ‘Cosmotheism’ isn’t for every White, but only ‘for the more intelligent among us’.
That doesn’t sound like a religion for Whites in general, but a cult for ‘the elect’.
—
I beg your pardon, Wimp. Are you suggesting Cosmotheism is a cult?
The last individual I recall saying that was Harold “Big Lie” Covington. Are you a fan of his scribblings?
Since you like dictionary definitions, the word “cult,” in a religious sense, means: a body of beliefs and practices regarding the supernatural and the worship of one or more deities. That sounds to me more like the Semitic creeds — Judaism, Christianity and Islam — that worship the supernatural deity up in the sky, Yahweh, aka Jehovah or Allah, respectively.
For those who may be interested in the transition of an intelligent man who was a dedicated Christian for much of his life, but eventually turned his back on the Jesus cult to eventually become a Cosmotheist and National Alliance member. Our most recent edition of his Magnum Opus, is available here: Which Way Western Man? (Third Edition) by William Gayley Simpson – Cosmotheism
Wimpy, you would probably prefer this review of Simpson’s WWWM? on C-C by another very intelligent White loyalist, Dr. Revilo P. Oliver: William Gayley Simpson’s Which Way Western Man?
—
White Nationalism as ‘Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason‘ is the only religion – a binding Whites to each other – that Whites need. Everything flows from Whites embracing this ethos, this self-concept, this affective order of meaning.
That’s some fancy double-talk, Wimpy, but what’s the spiritual foundation for this alleged big tent WN “religion”? Can believers follow any of the many denominations of Semitic creeds? How ’bout Satanism? Voo-doo? how do you bind them together if they are so divided by faith?
I have some more to say to you, Hamburger Today, about your WN “religion.”
—
Hamburger Today: January 31, 2025 …White Nationalism as ‘Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason‘ is the only religion – a binding Whites to each other – that Whites need…
Any part of ‘White Nationalism’ that purports to separate Whites from each other, to elevate one White over another on principle, isn’t really a White Nationalism suitable for the present task of bringing Whites together…
—
Thank you for that, Wimpy. You make the case that Cosmotheism is not part of your “White Nationalism” religion because it isn’t. We Cosmotheists realize enlightened White realists, or, as you call us, “elites (thanks),” will separate ourselves not only from non-Whites, but from the mass of whites (ower case) who are racially irresponsible.
Wolf Stoner, an experienced racial nationalist and modern Cosmotheist thinker, expresses the hard facts in his recent piece: The White race versus white rats, here: (184) Words of Wolf Stoner – Page 19 – White Biocentrism An excerpt:
...First of all, we need to understand the simple truth that the present White society is doomed. There is no need to save it. On the contrary, this society is in a state that fully merits the application of the famous Nietzsche’s advice: “that which is falling should also be pushed”. In our particular case we don’t even need to exert any effort on our part. Our task is to stop trying to prevent others from destroying the failing society. Let it fall! The sooner the better. The more pain is inflicted on this decadent society the better. They fully deserve it; they earned it by their laziness, stupidity, inattentiveness and greed. For too long they tended exclusively to their own materialistic needs and supposed that they don’t owe anything to their White brethren….
We can’t do anything about it and we must not do anything. Those who chose death and self-destruction, must die. Those who don’t value their White identity, don’t deserve it. We owe nothing to them.
Now let’s look onto those Whites who are clever enough to understand the reality but too greedy and cowardly to go against the prevailing current.
There are plenty of clever Whites who occupy the key social positions and who have enough intelligence to understand simple logical chains. They see the wrong path that society goes along and they understand the treacherous nature of the ruling class but their share in society is too high to risk it. They rationalize their support of the system (to their own consciousness) by defending their own interests and caring for the future of their children. Yes, they think that they serve good for their posterity by gaining wealth even when the whole society falls. These people think that in the future, somehow, they will be able to find their way in the different social environment.
This kind of people are ultimate rats. They are clever but devoid of morality and high spiritual values. Their main task is to survive and thrive in any environment and at any cost; even if it requires betrayal of their community.
It must be acknowledged that these people are very successful in modern society. The greater part of millionaires, billionaires, professional politicians and military leadership consists of this kind. The problem with their life-philosophy is that they fail to understand that, if the whole White society collapses, there will be no place for them too. The wild non-white crowds, to whom they cater now, will devour their own benefactors as well.
These clever white rats have high enough intelligence to successfully guide their way in the stormy waters of modern society but they fail to see beyond the horizon. They don’t have eagle’s wings for this.
But the time will come when these rats will perceive the great shift and start to clamber on our ship. This problem must be addressed beforehand; it is sure to happen in the future. I can’t suggest any fool-proof solution now but only warn that it will be this way. We must not allow this kind of people to have any decent place in the future White society. The only suitable place for rats is cellar and garbage-dump, not the royal palaces and military headquarters.
The main lesson that history teaches us is that the greatest decisive battles will happen between Whites themselves.
Most probably, it is arranged this way by Providence itself. As I said, the interracial competition was already concluded long ago. Now is the fight inside the White race itself; some kind of harsh natural test of durability. The final result isn’t predetermined. It could go both ways.
If the best part of Whites wins, then, there will be civilizational rejuvenation and the prospect of further evolution. If the selfish lowly part of Whites wins, then, the civilization will collapse and be destroyed by non-white crowds.
Therefore, it isn’t so much a competition between Whites and non-whites but between different kinds of Whites.
As it is well-known from biology the internal competition in species is much more harsh than external. It is why the both world wars were so uncompromising and bloody.
The fate of the White race will be decided not in a war against aliens but in a mortal struggle against other Whites.
We must accept this reality and act accordingly. The worst thing is to fall into delusion of possible White unity and peaceful coexistence of White nations. It isn’t going to happen. The final solution of this problem will involve boundless bloodshed and extermination of incalculable millions of Whites by other Whites.
Yes, there will be wars against non-whites as well but only as a side-show….
Read more of Wolf’s reasoned prophecy of the racial struggle to come at the link.
I’m glad you agree that ‘Cosmotheism’ doesn’t care about most Whites. Which is why I could not embrace it. And also why it does not strike as a White Nationalist belief system.
I want to suggest a practical advice for those interested in Cosmotheism. The best first step is to start looking at the stars. Acquire a star-map and start to identify noticeable patterns; read about Astronomy. The books on Astronomy by Ian Ridpath and Wil Tirion are the best for beginners. Astronomy is the most accessible science for everyone. You don’t need to be a billionaire in order to look at the night sky. This magnificent scientific laboratory is equally available for all. It is the best connection to the Universe, its laws and to our ancestors. They looked at the same stars and had similar feelings. Astronomy was the foundation for all ethnic religions before Semitic myopic religions conquered the world. In essence, Cosmotheism naturally incorporates all pre-Christian European religions. All people associating themselves with Odinism and other native cults, can easily make a further step into acquiring broader outlook and becoming cosmotheists. It was my path to this worldview.
Look at the stars and you will be cured from Christianity. It is the sure path shown us by Bruno, Copernicus, Galileo and other visionaries of our race.
I’m not sure how looking at the night sky will help you to connect with other Whites as Whites can to care about them. A ‘White religion’ that doesn’t steer Whites to care about Whites because they are White and no other reason is really a ‘religion’ for our people as a whole, but only some part.
And I will suggest to you that the influence of ‘the Right’ on White politics has been to separate Whites from each other in the pursuit of ‘Faustian’ this and ‘elite’ that or ‘excellence’ at something other than caring about Whites.
What the White Vanguard owe the White World is primal racial loyalty. How else can they have confidence that we are going to lead all Whites to the Promised Land?
This bit of political news should be considered here in “Religion & the Right The Christianity Question.”
Is “our” new, hard-charging Secretary of Defense (formerly Secretary of War) a right-wing Christian like that young nutcase Fuentes who styles himself a leader of Whites and has said that when his crew “takes over,” all who are not Christian will be eradicated?
Hegseth is even more dangerous with his unhinged Christian Zionism than I first thought back in November. Of course, the Democrat senators didn’t closely grill him on his Israel First positions at his confirmation hearing to be SoD because, as politicians, they are Zionists themselves, or close to it. They were more interested in rumors of his drinking and skirt-chasing 20 years ago.
From the Jewish periodical, The Forward: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/pete-hegseth-s-belief-in-christian-dominion-should-deeply-trouble-american-jews/
…But since the senators at Hegseth’s hearing did not press him further, he did not explain the specific source of his rightwing Zionism: his church, a small congregation outside Nashville. Its teachings dovetail with Christian Reconstructionism, a little-known evangelical movement with big dreams of establishing a theocratic Christian government. And if you, like me, are one of the 73% of Americans who think religion should not dictate government policies, Hegseth’s beliefs are a good example of why that separation is so essential.
Christian Reconstructionists believe that God’s law, in particular the legal mandates of the Hebrew Bible, should govern society. Their goal is a theocracy in which believers rule, and sinners, as well as non-believers, can be put to death. At its inception in the late 1950s, Reconstructionism was tied to Calvinism, but dominion theology — the notion that Christians should govern nations according to Biblical law — has been embraced by a wide range of evangelicals.
More about nutty evangelical Zionists at NV, like this close call with Mike Pompeo who had been groomed to be either President or Trump’s VP running mate, here: Patriotic Gore, part 2 | National Vanguard
Wolf Stoner: January 31, 2025 I want to suggest a practical advice for those interested in Cosmotheism.
The best first step is to start looking at the stars. Acquire a star-map and start to identify noticeable patterns; read about Astronomy. The books on Astronomy by Ian Ridpath and Wil Tirion are the best for beginners. Astronomy is the most accessible science for everyone. You don’t need to be a billionaire in order to look at the night sky. This magnificent scientific laboratory is equally available for all. It is the best connection to the Universe, its laws and to our ancestors. They looked at the same stars and had similar feelings. Astronomy was the foundation for all ethnic religions before Semitic myopic religions conquered the world.
In essence, Cosmotheism naturally incorporates all pre-Christian European religions. All people associating themselves with Odinism and other native cults, can easily make a further step into acquiring broader outlook and becoming cosmotheists. It was my path to this worldview.
Look at the stars and you will be cured from Christianity. It is the sure path shown us by Bruno, Copernicus, Galileo and other visionaries of our race.
—
Thank you for telling us your path to Cosmotheism, Wolf. It was disappointing for me to read Wimpy’s shallow comment below this from you:
—
Hamburger Today: I’m not sure how looking at the night sky will help you to connect with other Whites as Whites can to care about them…
—
It’s been my experience that it takes a open-minded, perceptive, cerebral person to see the order in our universe by studying the night sky as you describe. William Pierce looked at Nature as a scientist and explained it in simple terms, like you.
I read Thomas Paine’s The Age of Reason 30-plus years ago and he said something similar to your words about the macro view of our world. I should read Age again. I recall he said one can view the same universal micro order of Nature’s laws by looking through a microscope. The same laws apply and are mush easier to see now than in his day or in Bruno’s, Copernicus’s, Galileo’s and other visionaries of our race.
It’s no wonder that Jews and churchmen of all stripes feared enlightened Paine. I found these statements attributed to him:
I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.
All national institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.
Paine would have wished he’d said, “Look at the stars and you will be cured from Christianity.” ;o}
Hamburger Today: February 4, 2025 I’m glad you agree that ‘Cosmotheism’ doesn’t care about most Whites.
—
No, Wimpy, I do not agree with that statement by you. I care about many mainstream Whites who do not understand Cosmotheism (no scare quotes, please), even Christians, but most of them are not interested in our little tent.
There must be many things that you and I can agree on, but religion is not one of them. I suspect, though, that I’m more passionate about preserving our race than you, truth be told.
—
Which is why I could not embrace it. And also why it does not strike as a White Nationalist belief system.
—
Where can I see the points of your White nationalist belief system listed? So far all I can tell from you is that it is a very big tent that includes all Whites, including defectives.
Lexi: December 2, 2024 I have to say, sometimes I get the impression that anti-Christian Whites in the movement just aren’t really WN in the way that Christians are.
—
I cannot speak for the so-called “movement.” Is that Hamburger Today’s WN movement? He’s not anti-Christian. You can join his <ahem!> vanguard.
However, as National Alliance Chairman and Trustee of the Cosmotheist Church I can say our followers are not anti-Christian, as far as being against individual Christians for their beliefs, since most of us were raised Christian ourselves.
We do reserve the right to criticize those otherworldly Jew-spawned Christian beliefs as unsuitable for our people — Europeans, not Middle-Easterners.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.