Counter-Currents
903 words 
Talking about pro-white politics on social media is all well and good in terms of the nebulous moving of the Overton Window. But there are really only a handful of strategies the pro-white community can implement which would be long lasting, game changing, and decisive to our long-term goals. Among them:
- Building intentional communities where our kind live together to consolidate power.
- Convening a Council of Nicaea-like moot in which a general strategy and a public-facing spokesperson is appointed.
- Transitioning from a loose network of streamers and social media accounts towards the skeleton of formal infrastructure.
Point 2 has the same logic as Point 1. As a radical dissident minority, pro-white advocates need a way to consolidate their power for maximum impact on issues of broad agreement. “Concentration of force” or “mass at the point of impact” is one of the nine Principles of War articulated in Army Field Manual FM-3, distilling the tested combat techniques of earlier theorists like Carl von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. Although I’m specifically talking about implementing nonviolent political strategies like public information campaigns, pressuring political representatives, and the promotion of public policies aligning with our strategic objectives, the principles are the same.
On the first point, I’ll briefly promote a couple of these intentional communities already in development. There is the Return to the Land movement in Arkansas, a new pro-white Christian Nationalist movement in Gainsborough, TN and the famous Afrikaner community in Orania, South Africa. If you have the ability to pick up and relocate, these communities, if successful, could be more resistant to outside political forces and ensure the survival of your family line multi-generationally.
On the second point, the spokesperson for collective interests should have a focused message that articulates the priorities invested in him by the entire community. This probably means that the person should NOT be a livestreamer, or at least not a current independently active one. Livestreamers have done a lot of good in helping create a subculture out of pro-white talking points. But they also spend too much time in front of the camera, often saying wildly off-topic things which would be harmful to group priorities. The very nature of the e-celebrity streaming economy prioritizes shock jocks and having “hot takes,” not because they make sense to broad strategic objectives but in order to satisfy the job requirement of endlessly churning out content.
You can buy Jason Kessler’s book Charlottesville & the Death of Free Speech here.
The desire to have unique takes and to differentiate from market competitors, too often leads to contrarian “Well AKSHUALLY…” opinions where figureheads end up embracing left-wing positions like sabotaging Trump in support of Kamala Harris, dropping white identity to team up with blacks and Muslims, supporting the destruction of Confederate monuments and praising Antifa rioters in solidarity with Palestine. And that’s just Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with making a living from live-streaming. But white identity politics should really re-examine how we regard these people as de-facto leaders. There is just too much time spent in front of a camera saying wild stuff to get attention. Besides that there are serious concerns about the loyalty of many of these people to the community. Recent leaks regarding the left-wing streamer Destiny (born: Steven Bonnell II) show that he was in an intimate relationship with Alt-Light streamer girl Lauren Southern. Streamer Nicholas Fuentes called Destiny his “best friend” on several occasions. This is a guy who expressed satisfaction with Antifa thugs murdering political dissidents and called for even center right political commentators like Tim Pool to be driven from the internet with censorship.
Why I’m voting for Kamala Harris. pic.twitter.com/WpRVWSGuPd
— Richard Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) November 2, 2024
Allowing the community to revolve around the streaming eco-system ensures that the white identity community will always come second to the loyalties within the streaming community. That’s only natural because these people are running money making operations first, not political advocacy groups for the general welfare of our community.
It may seem like there is too wide a chasm between the objectives of American Renaissance, Counter-Currents, VDARE, The Right Stuff, the Groypers and other groups. And yet, anyone who is serious about making an impact in the brief years we have on the political stage should be willing to set their differences aside and agree on some very general strategic goals which are indisputably in the interests of Europeans in America and around the world.
This would almost certainly be a more moderate enterprise. It would necessarily have to be in order to find consensus between moderates and radicals. We probably wouldn’t see eye to eye on an approach to other races, and that’s probably for the best. It should be something unambiguously pro-white rather than anti-anyone else. Agreed upon strategies might be more conservative in nature, drawing from the playbooks of mainstream political lobbies so as to avoid embroiling risk averse parties and financiers into lawfare attacks. That doesn’t mean that consenting parties would not be free to continue advocated on other issues of their own priorities, it just wouldn’t be associated with the group.
Having a consolidated unified voice on matters of broad priorities, strategy and tactics would help white identity politics form a structural base and an engine ensuring we move forward in a defined and cohesive way. The alternative is what we have now: an informal polyglot of diverse voices echoing into the vacuum of social media, hoping it will conjure a deus ex machina from the abyss.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
4 comments
‘Concentration of force’ assumes the enemy does not have the ability to take advantage of force-concentration to destroy the army en masse. That’s not the case here. Consequently, ‘concentration of force’ would be ill-advised.
If one uses North America as the area of operation, then it doesn’t take much historical knowledge to understand that every formal ‘activist’ organization has been infiltrated or physically assaulted.
Every.
Thus, the concept of ‘leaderless resistance’ was originally introduced into pro-White politics by Louis Beam. Under the relentless antagonism and physical violence of the US internal security apparatus ‘leaderless resistance’ developed into the diffuse system of ‘nodes’ that currently exist and has been stable and effective at suffusing pro-White ideas into North American political culture.
Until someone solves the problem of the effectiveness of the US internal security apparatus at infiltrating and destroying public-facing pro-White ‘activist’ organizations, there is no advantage to investing in such organizations.
None.
The idea of a pro-White Nicene Council ignores the fact that those councils were formed under the protection of the authorities, not in face of official hostility.
I think the simplicity of Christianity allowed it to grow. Also, from the perspective of the lower classes, Christian association allowed them access to some of the middle class and upper class believers. These middle and upper class believers adopted Christian beliefs because those beliefs provided a very clear answer to the question, ‘What happens to me when I did?’, which was not the case with Paganism (or the Pagan answer had been undermined by the selling of sacred land by the Patriarchs of the Families).
For me, White Nationalism is ‘Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason‘. It’s my religion. It’s a belief that binds me to every other White person and to every other non-White loyal to ‘living while White’. It’s about racial loyalty and according dignity to every White you meet. No exceptions.
https://public.websites.umich.edu/~satran/Ford%2006/Wk%202-1%20Terrorism%20Networks%20leaderless-resistance.pdf
Remember, even though I’m using military strategy terminology we aren’t actually going to mass in a particular area. We’re talking about information war and traditional political lobby tactics.
Yes, there would probably need to be an in-person meeting but its not like people aren’t already doing that at various conferences throughout the year. Government protection of such a meeting would not be strictly necessary, although if you’ve ever seen the police presence at Amren you know that there are places where it can he obtained.
Once a direction is agreed upon, communication can be handled over the internet and telephone. All of us are already online, what I’m suggesting is a greater degree of coordination, because without the ability to mass we will be too weak to effectively push our agenda to the forefront.
This is an insightful article. I’ve long thought that we need greater and more cohesive organization. The question is how to get there, especially when herding cats is likely a simpler challenge.
I suppose such arrangements must grow out of an alliance of local organizations into district-, county-, state-, and eventually country-wide organizations. It’s much more feasible for us to gain power in our school board, city council, or GOP district than it is to gain statewide or national power. If white advocates in enough neighboring towns and districts are doing the same, they can be linked into a county-wide alliance, and so on… I don’t think we can go directly to a credible national organization without wealthy or institutional backing.
The major stumbling block is the egos involved in White identity politics. The nature of the information war we fight online selects for narcissistic personalities.
There are statesmen within our movement who could step up and act as a go-between if they so desired. Jared could do it. James Edwards. Greg could get a decent chunk of the community too, etc.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.