Biden is out. Trump is in. Is that a good thing for those of us who wonder if we were awake for the last four years or in an extended nightmare populated by a rogues’ gallery of psychopaths, racketeers, grafters, swindlers, weirdos and sundry lowlifes? All of whom appeared to have crawled out of that dark and fetid swamp; none of whom you would trust with your money, your safety or your children.
Here, however, is the problem with the question, at this point. No one I know can truly say: who Trump is. Or what Trump is. Maybe it depends on what the meaning of “is” is, per Bill Clinton, whose devotion to the truth was surpassed only by that of his highly principled misses, Our Lady of Chappaqua.
However, we do know who Joe Biden is, or better now, was, and anyone who followed what the old coot had been up to before 2021 could have easily predicted that post-2021 would be an orgy of corruption, maleficence and outright criminality. Joe Robinette, a serial plagiarizer, inveterate braggart and habitual buffoon, in charge of the government was like Ted Bundy running a battered women’s shelter. He did pretty much all you would expect (predict) given his clinical dementia, Obama’s patronage, the opportunists and ideologues pulling his strings, the absence of a serious opposition party and the state-run media managing the optics. The Party brass finally had to give him the heave-ho and replace him with a bungling, boozy valley girl whose singular distinction had to do with affirmative action. You must have thought that all the Democrats had left to offer the voters was nihilism – governing just for the hell of it!
Biden’s presidential performance as a life-long, Democrat, swamp-creature was predictable. Revoltingly, stupidly predictable.
Trump, however, is frustratingly, disconcertingly unpredictable. Which bring us to the question: who is Donald Trump?
Does anyone really know? We do know what he is not.
Since he rode down the golden escalator in Trump tower, June 2015, to announce his presidential candidacy, the vast legions of his enemies and detractors quickly drew the conclusion that he must be a “fascist,” with all the trappings: bigotry, intolerance and racism. A reaction of this sort comes from a logically disjunctive Manichean mindset permanently locked in the year 1939. “Good” is embodied in the “religion” of liberal democracy with its worship of “equality” and its embrace of the pathologies of wokeism. “Evil” must be the negation of liberal democracy as manifest in the person – do I have to say it? – okay, Hitler. Trump had risen up to affirm the interests and traditional values of white working-class Americans over the brown masses flooding across the southern border, a constituency of the needy and oppressed deemed the future of liberal democracy, and – dare I say it? – the new face of America. That made Trump an enemy of liberal democracy, an evil person, which, of course, was very scary and suddenly it was 1939 once again. Only Hitler this time had an orange comb-over instead of a Charlie Chaplin moustache.
Except, Trump is not a fascist, at least not in any remotely historical sense of what that term means, as I argued an article written several years ago. Anyone with the slightest familiarity with the biographies of Mussolini (fascism’s founder), Hitler (the German version), Oswald Mosley (the British version) – the original fascists, the “gold standard” to which Trump is constantly compared – would know how absurd the comparison is. Trump doesn’t claim to be a fascist and probably resents being called one. The Big Three proudly announced themselves to the world as fascists. They strutted around in black and brown uniforms, staged massive parades with banners, made the stiff-armed Roman salute every ten minutes, and bragged about how superior fascists were to everyone else.
While claiming superiority, mainly for himself, Trump has never called himself a fascist and never dressed like one. He called himself a Democrat for a while, rubbed shoulders with the Clintons. For a time, he said he was an independent. This was before he became a Republican and comically wiped the floor with the pre-selected doofuses like Jeb Bush in the 2016 Presidential primaries. The video montage from the Republican primary debates and the look on hapless Jeb’s face, as Trump in his inimitable carnival-show-hawker style heaped deserved scorn upon him, is priceless entertainment. The incredulous MSM talking heads sputtered and fumed – first reduced to mocking him, shortly after which he became a “fascist.” And, so he has remained so up through the 2024 Presidential election.
Ask yourself: Why in the world would Trump, who worships success, “winners,” identify in any possible way with three colossal losers, whose careers terminated with suicide, a firing squad, and prison? Look how things turned out for George Lincoln Rockwell.
Is Trump a crypto-fascist? Don’t be silly. From World Wrestling Entertainment impresario to Der Fuhrer? One cannot be a serious fascist over a long period of time, even secretly, without giving some indications. When he rode down the elevator, Trump was 71 years old. Before he ran for President in 2015 no one seemed to have the slightest clue or fear that he was Mussolini redux, plotting “the destruction of our democracy.” This was after decades as a high profile, New York City entrepreneur, a media celebrity, a serial monogamist with a decadent playboy lifestyle that invited national attention, attention that he greatly relished.
After so many years in the spotlight with no indication, just when did Trump become the whatever-sort-of fascist he is supposed to be? Did Hillary Clinton suspect that Trump was a fascist when she sat in that front row seat at his wedding to Melania?
People don’t, all of a sudden, become fascists in their late 60s. Fascism is, or was, a young man’s sort of thing. Mussolini, Hitler, and Mosley, all three were combat veterans from the WWI trenches, deeply disillusioned with the outcome, and radicalized at relatively early ages in the aftermath. They were openly hostile to and alienated from their countries’ political establishment. Trump was an ambitious rich kid who skipped Vietnam, became a workaholic hedonist, got even richer, then got bored and turned to politics later in life. He was never alienated from American society, rather one of its more colorful jet-setters.
Perhaps Trump is a Fascist but doesn’t know that he is one. So, whatever it is that he might think he is, he is confused, clueless or deluded and must really be a fascist without realizing it. Donald Trump doesn’t strike me be as a particularly introspective or self-reflective man, and being a fascist, psychologically speaking, I am confident to say, is a lot like being a communist, a socialist or a feminist. It demands serious introspection. You think, reflect, then put into play a tightly (fanatically?) embraced set of priorities because you firmly believe the world is not currently the way it should be, and you are determined to fix it. Many unflattering things can be said about Donald Trump, but “fanatic” is not one of them.
So, whatever Donald Trump was and is, rest assured, he is not, never was, and never will be a fascist – not a swashbuckling one, not a secret one, not an unaware one.
What else is Trump not? As noted above, he is not a serious, reflective thinker. He’s not religious. He has no discernable political philosophy with a set of principles that would guide him through difficult decision-making or the formation of his policies, and give him a consistent direction. Which accounts in part for his unpredictability. A “conservative”? A “liberal”? A “libertarian”? None of these or others I might propose are handles we can use to tell us what Trump will do in a given situation.
Is he an unprincipled opportunist, unlike, say, Hillary Clinton?
What Trump is, I believe, is a man profoundly changed by his entry into the political arena relatively late in life. The level and volume of vituperation, scorn and calumny poured down on him by the smart set of which he had been a part appear to be unprecedented in the history of American politics. Trump Derangement Syndrome should be covered in the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Every conceivable effort by the establishment was unleashed to destroy him, including bankruptcy and criminal prosecution.
All of this, I believe, brought about a conversion of sorts. Trump appears to be a different man than he was in 2015. In that conversion, he gathered up an extraordinary sense of purpose and determination, guided by instinct and intuition, with which he launched a political resurrection no American politician had ever before done. For all of his shortcomings, his powers of will and endurance in the face of enormous adversity are simple phenomenal. To achieve what he did one senses motives beyond a vainglorious ego or a craving for adulation, and that he has persisted because does have a love for his country and a vision of a better America for, as he said in his 1st Inaugural Address , “[t]he forgotten men and women of our country [who] will be forgotten no longer.”
With his convincing election mandate from last November, he is now poised to be a much different President than the first time around. Will he be? He remains an enigma and unpredictable. But there are still many who think they know him. For those that hate him he will remain the caricature “fascist.” Those that love him believe that he will “make America great again.”
And there are those of us who still don’t know him, but we see that during the last four years the ruling class has taken off the gloves. We know that it regards white, Christian, traditional Americans as “the enemy” and intends the very worse for us and our progeny. We know that Kamala Harris’s election would have continued the rolling catastrophe of Obama and Biden. With Trump there is hope that he will change the course, that he will demonstrate that he is on the side of those Americans currently being replaced, pardon the J6 demonstrators and Derreck Chauvin, shut down the war in Ukraine, and deport illegal immigrants…for starters. Soon we will know if Trump II is for real.

13 comments
“On Trump’s inauguration day, Stephen Paul Foster points out that we still don’t know who he really is or what he stands for.” On the contrary, we do know who he really is or what he stands for, Trump is a traitor. We have a short memory, don’t we ! A few weeks ago Trump had a very simple choice – back maga the people who elected him or cheap foreign labor(H1B). The Traitor Trump (TTT) chose cheap foreign labor.
Today, the pushovers know as maga, will go to his inauguration & cheer for the traitor. Maga is pathetically weak, is not a force to be reckoned with even though they represent the largest voting block. They don’t deserve their acronym in all caps. Maga deserves what it tolerates.
I prefer the capitalize MAGA, even though I agree with you about Trump. MAGA love Israel too much – that’s their real problem. If only they put America First and were neutral on Israel, then they would be better off.
“MAGA love Israel too much – that’s their real problem.”
Why bother calling themselves – make America great again – when they love Israel too much? They, maga, should be loving America too much, apparently maga has a defective brain.
“If only they put America First…”. Again, why bother calling themselves maga when they don’t put America First. Who needs enemies when we have maga. The ship of fools is maga.
Weakness causes problems.
They could put their own country ahead of Israel in their loyalty. That would be an improvement. They could go even further, and learn who is their real enemy, but that would be too much to hope for.
I share your distain for MAGA. They definitely put Israel first and America a distant second. Nevertheless, looking at the big picture, the Democrats manage to be even worse – ten times worse. Most leftwingers are anti-White, and they include Israel as a White country.
1John: January 20, 2025 “MAGA love Israel too much – that’s their real problem.”…Who needs enemies when we have maga. The ship of fools is maga….
—
Yes, MAGA fools’ logo might as well be the Mogen David.
Those few C-Cers who know well the answer to the JQ, and have the moral courage to say so, means they do not fear naming Jews as the primary enemy of the White race. For that reason alone they should not be docile MAGA enthusiasts.
Read this entire article from back in September to understand why: At DC Event, Trump Promises to “Make Israel Great Again”
President Donald Trump said Thursday at a ‘Fighting Antisemitism’ event in Washington DC that the upcoming US election is “the most important” in Israel’s history. Watch Trump’s remarks and event host Yehuda Kaploun…
Trump promised to not only “make America great again,” but to “make Israel great again.”
How can a parasitic tribe of liars that was never great be made great again?
Great article as always. Thank you so much for reminding us of the look on Jeb! Bush’s face. That is belly laugh material.
It will come as no surprise to readers here that “fascist” is the leftist/Jewish code-word for “White.” And so we have the bizarre situation of a leader whose base is at least 85% White, the reason why he is so hated, yet he hardly says our name much less advocates overtly for us. We have become The Race That Dare Not Say Its Name. In his inaugural he mentioned all the sacred victim coloreds, but not us. I have tried to think of a nifty analogy, but I know of no historical precedent for such an Alice-In-Wonderland political order.
The wretched tribe embodied by lifelong anti-White grifter Biden, so well described here as “a swamp creature” will be on the defensive for the next few years. That alone is satisfying and a huge relief. But I suspect the most we can hope for with Trump’s loose-cannon behavior is to take advantage of all the openings it provides. Who knows, perhaps his second term will ignite the Blues desire for secession and partition? A consummation devoutly to be wished.
The Blue leadership will not abandon the source that they use as scraps for their clients and a feast for themselves.
My impression of that speech was the same. After all of the scorn, vitriol an outright pogrom and overt calls for our genocide in the past four years, not a mention of us but a double mention for those votes he desperately needed.
Very disappointing opening salvo. We must use our time and energy wisely.
I hope the author is right about Trump’s epiphany. We’ll soon see.
Over the last 10 years (nearly), the attacks on Trump have been hysterical and hyperbolic. They resemble the Stalinists’ attacks against Trotsky for their level of absurdity and calumny. (In fact, Trotsky was a good communist, loyal to the USSR. Without Lenin and Trotsky, there would have been no successful putsch, and no victory in the resultant civil war.)
The entire lawfare campaign against Trump has been a massive Abuse of Process. It has permanently disgraced the legal system in certain leftwing jurisdictions, especially in New York.
Is Trump more like Biden than we wish to admit? Stories of his previous administration include his forgetting to sign off documents on his desk, confirming what Ann Coulter wrote about “policy was that of the last one he talked to”. Trump likes showmanship and Americans like that too. He’s not a Nixon or Kennedy, even discounting age.
If Trump’s subordinates can implement policy to placate some of the white middle and lower class with actual gains, the next four years could be better than I expect.
https://www.inquirer.com/politics/january-6-pardons-donald-trump-inauguration-executive-orders-20250120.html
well for those who doubted him on this issue, he’s making good on his promise. I hope he does the same for CVille pows.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/trump-pardons-about-1-500-jan-6-defendants/ar-AA1xyflL
Trump wasted no time lifting sanctions on israeli settlers.
https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-cancels-sanctions-far-right-israeli-settlers-occupied-west-bank-2025-01-21/
Stronza: January 23, 2025 Trump wasted no time lifting sanctions on israeli settlers https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-cancels-sanctions-far-right-israeli-settlers-occupied-west-bank-2025-01-21/
Since the 1967 Middle East war, Israel has occupied the West Bank of the Jordan River, which Palestinians want as the core of an independent state. It has built Jewish settlements there that most countries deem illegal. Israel disputes this and cites historical and Biblical ties to the land.
—
Ha! Jewish history from the Big Jew Book. How convenient for the chosenites.
Thanks for this, Stronza. Trump can throw hundreds of billions more of American taxpayers’ dollars to the “Israeli” occupiers, even a trillion from his new big tech Jew partners, but that doesn’t mean he/they will ultimately prevail against Palestinians. See “the other side of the story,” here: (183) Palestinians & Friends Attack Israeli Occupiers – Page 52 – White Biocentrism
Official: Hamas will defeat Israel in West Bank
“…A senior Hamas official says the Palestinian resistance movement will defeat Israel in the occupied West Bank as it did in the besieged Gaza Strip…
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.