Counter-Currents
“Only White Nationalism Will Make Wakanda Real”
Black Panther
Trevor Lynch
1,404 words
I saw Black Panther with a friend in Seattle last week. Judging from the reverent silence in the theater — broken only occasionally by our laughter at unintentional bits of humor — it was an all-white audience. The serious tone of Black Panther is a departure from recent Marvel movies, which constantly undercut heroism with ironic humor. But Black Panther is a movie about numinous, magical Negroes, and some things are sacred. God is not mocked. (Unless he is Thor.)
Given the massive media hype and grotesque, fawning patronage of white liberals, I was prepared to hate Black Panther. But it really isn’t a terrible movie, although I would not see it again.
The premise of Black Panther is ludicrous, but no sillier than most superhero movies. The superhero known as Black Panther is the hereditary monarch of a remote African kingdom called Wakanda. Wakanda, like Ethiopia, Lesotho, and Swaziland, was not colonized by whites. Wakanda also possesses a unique natural resource, a magical metal of extraterrestrial origin called “vibranium.” (One has to ask: when Stan Lee and Jack Kirby created the Black Panther character in 1966, was “vibrant” already a euphemism for non-white?) Because of their isolation and vibranium, Wakanda developed the most advanced technology on the planet. To protect themselves from white colonizers, the Wakandans used this technology to hide their futuristic capital city — complete with flying cars — behind some sort of ray shield, like an African Galt’s Gulch.
Black Panther is a deeply feminist film, even though feminism is as common in the real Africa as flying cars. Sometimes the costumes and set design look like they could have come from the pen of A. Wyatt Mann, especially the guy with the green zoot suit and matching lip plate. There is a hilarious scene in which some Wakandans shut up a white man by oogaing. (I pray that this catches on.) When a Wakandan flying car shows up in Oakland, the local urban youths immediately start talking about stripping it and selling the parts. Naturally, the white liberals around me were terrified to laugh at any of this.
But at a certain point, I simply decided to view Black Panther as a science fiction movie set a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, and this suspension of disbelief allowed me to relax and enjoy the spectacle.
The plot of Black Panther deals with the rise of a new king/Black Panther, T’Challa (played by Chadwick Boseman), who faces two challenges to Wakandan isolationism.
The first challenge is the liberal welfare statism of T’Challa’s ex-girlfriend Nakia (Lupita Nyong’o), a spy who roves around Africa doing good deeds for impoverished and oppressed Africans. She thinks that Wakanda needs to become a humanitarian superpower like Sweden, sending foreign aid and taking in refugees. (Let’s call this option “Dem Programs,” for short.)
The second challenge is represented by T’Challa’s American-raised cousin N’Jadaka/”Killmonger” (Michael B. Jordan), who wishes to spark a global black revolution by exporting Wakandan weapons and technology to black revolutionaries and gangsters around the globe. (We’ll call this option “Kill Whitey,” for short.)
There has been a lot of debate about the politics of Black Panther, most of it wrong-headed.
Wakanda is a black, isolationist ethnostate which cultivates a fierce patriotism. When T’Challa shares Nakia’s suggestion to open Wakanda to refugees with W’Kabi, a tribal leader played by Daniel Kaluuya, the response is simple: Refugees would inevitably bring their problems to Wakanda and destroy their way of life. I was shocked that such sentiments made it to the screen, but the reason soon became clear: W’Kabi is a villain, and Black Panther only voices such Trumpian sentiments to dismiss them.
To repeat: Black Panther is not an ethnonationalist, isolationist movie. To be sure, it shows how such policies created a great society. But the message is that it is selfish for Wakanda to keep its treasures to itself. It must share them with the world, even at the risk of losing its identity and independence.
Furthermore, although Killmonger is an eloquent advocate for the global extermination of white people, Black Panther is not Walt Disney’s Kill Whitey. (There’s a good meme in there, through.) Indeed, Killmonger is the main villain of the movie, and he is defeated and killed by T’Challa, who does not take his cousin’s ideas the least bit seriously. Instead, he regards them as merely a symptom of the malaise of black people under colonial oppression. He even blames his cousin’s downfall on his father’s decision to abandon him in America rather than raise him in Wakanda. This mistake, of course, was rooted in Wakandan isolationism.
Black Panther isn’t even anti-white per se. Yes, the only colonial oppressors mentioned are whites. Nary a word is spoken about the vast Arab slave trade. Yes, one of the principal villains is a white South African with the subtle name Klaue (“claw”) played by Andy Serkis. But one of the heroes of the movie is a white man, Everett K. Ross (Martin Freeman), who is an agent of the CIA no less. Yes, the good white guy works for the American deep state. Let that message to black America sink in for a minute.
So what is the political message of Black Panther, once both isolationist ethnonationalism and global white genocide are rejected? Dem Programs, of course. T’Challa comes to think that Wakanda has been wrong to selfishly guard its independence and hoard its wealth. Thus, at the end of the movie, T’Challa and his sister go to Oakland, California, one of America’s vibrant murder capitals, to outline his plans to uplift blacks around the world with Dem Programs. No doubt with the aid of their good friend in the CIA and other liberal white (((or whitish))) allies. Roll credits.
Black Panther is an entertaining spectacle, but in political terms it is a sinister fraud. It draws its energy by exciting black audiences with two Black Nationalist visions that, like it or not, resonate deeply with them: the advanced, isolationist, nationalist African Shangri-La of Wakanda and Killmonger’s project of global white genocide. But in the end, Black Panther rejects both forms of Black Nationalism and channels these energies into support for the present system of racial integration and liberal-managerial welfare statism under the tutelage of the Democratic Party and the globalist deep state.
Colonialism runs deeper than you think.
But this should come as no surprise, given that the creators of the original Black Panther comic are Jews. Writer Stan Lee was born Stanley Lieber, and artist Jack Kirby was born Jacob Kurtzberg. Moreover, both Marvel Studios and Walt Disney are completely loyal to Lee and Kirby’s Jewish vision of black-white race relations. As Kevin MacDonald outlines in his classic essay “Jews, Blacks, and Race,” Jewish organizations and individuals took a leading role in promoting black civil rights in America:
Jews have played a prominent role in organizing blacks beginning with the founding of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in 1909 and, despite increasing black anti-Semitism, continuing into the present. The NAACP was founded by wealthy German Jews, non-Jewish whites, and blacks led by W. E. B. DuBois. The Jewish role was predominant.
But Jews have promoted a very specific vision of black uplift, namely racial “integration” under the tutelage of the Democratic Party and the managerial state, which are dominated by a white and Jewish elite. Thus Jews have consistently opposed all forms of black separatism and isolationism, from Marcus Garvey in the first decades of the 20th century to Malcolm X in the 1960s to Louis Farrakhan today.
Wakanda is basically a black Switzerland: an neutral, isolationist society protected by high mountains that has grown wealthy and advanced by minding its own business. From the liberal-democratic-globalist point of view, Wakanda has no more right to exist that way than Switzerland does. Thus the fruits of its isolation must be shared. Its borders and bank accounts must be opened to the needy of the world. But there are just too many of these people. Thus global altruism can only tear down the advanced nations, not raise up the backward masses.
Only ethnonationalists oppose this globalist agenda. When White Nationalists come to power in the United States, we will create a black homeland on this continent, and we will call it Wakanda. Forget liberalism, the Democratic Party, and the managerial-welfare state. Only White Nationalism will make Wakanda real.
20 comments
You can’t learn anything about blacks from this movie, only about the non black creators.
Perhaps “programmers” would be a better term here than “creators.”
Political Correctness is a religion and no one is allowed to laugh in church.
I went to this once high end mall in the southeastern big city where I sometimes reside the other night, and it has been overrun by blacks. It was almost all white ten years ago.
But anyway I kept seeing this shirt on various males with a beautiful Marilyn Monroe/Madonna looking white woman’s face with the flesh rotting away to reveal the skull. Is this from one of those zombie shows, or is this some sort of propaganda and psychological warfare?
During WW2 the allies engaged in these bizarre psyops where the introduced currency and stamps into circulation in Germany that were identical to the real, but had the Nazi brass with part of their face rotting off. That’s what it reminded me of!
When I have brought up peaceful separation in the past and now again with this movie to blacks, they bring up Tulsa 1921. I usually just say that resulted because we were still in the same country. As a hilarious as it sounds, many blacks feel like whites would not leave them alone if they separated. Does counter-currents have any resources on this incident? I can’t find anything other than “whites are evil racists” bit.
Just google “Tulsa 1921” and it will bring up articles.
I have. The reason why I asked is there is always two sides to these kinds of stories and I am looking for a different point of view.
I think it says a lot that Wakanda is portrayed as being advanced not due to the efforts of the Wakandans in creating great art and technology, but just lucking out by finding a big cache of magic dirt. I guess understanding things like rule of law, property rights, and the scientific method isn’t as much fun to those with high time preferences. Stefan Molyneux has a great review on YouTube that I highly recommend.
I can’t bring myself to even rent this movie; the premise is just too stupid.
Good article but I have an issue with one assertion made by the author. He suggests that liberals don’t believe that Switzerland should remain isolationist. I have polled many liberals on the subject of the extremely elite building walls whether around their communities in the highlands of America’s big cities or in the most per capita wealthy countries like Switzerland, Monaco or Singapore. It may surprise most people reading this they almost without hesitation or exception they approve of this sort of separation as legitimated by the fact that these people earned their right to do as they willed, due to their immense fortune. And crucially, they openly state (to me) that this privilege is for that class alone and those not immensely wealthy have no such right to separate individually or collectively in like manner. What is good for the goose is most definitely not good for the gander here. Liberals are the pretorian guard cultivated by the international elite. It is important to confront them on this.
If you look on youtube many blacks are sympathetic and siding with the Killmonger character, not realizing the globalist message intended is for them as well as us. Of course I only care about how that affects whites in the long run but it shows the relative value of more primal instincts. This made a decent amount of money so expect more in this vein. A rich vein to extract more cultural critiques of our own.
Black Panther is, as are all superhero movies, an infantile piece of ((Amerikanische)) Unkultur. It should not exist.
Let me say this: all of this, including white superhero/fantasy movies, are an escape from the deteriorated real world in which we live.
All the while the Jewish studio owners sit in the background collecting trillions, including from you people who watch the movies.
I say with confidence that no-one here has paid a single shitty dime to watch / review these K-fests
” CLITORALLY HITLER “ or “The screaming stays with you forever”
( a quote from a White English policewoman who watched some FGM vids of babies being vibrantly enriched by diversity )
Some thoughts on FGM: But first, some thoughts on MGM:
Unfortunately all here are surely aware of those (predominantly) jew-produced , sick, garbage ‘horror’ films that reject traditional gothic spookiness and eerie ‘otherworldness’ and instead are increasingly reliant on hyper-realistic depictions of human torture and suffering , extreme gore, nasty sadistic voyeurism ,exemplified by the so-called “torture-porn” genre , made more traumatic and disturbing by the absence of the slapstick , kitsch or comedy , ketchup element of more innocent times, and more sophisticated, realistic special effects. (“You’ll believe a man can flay “)
( Joogle “Eli Roth” “Torture Porn” “Hostel” “Jigsaw ” )
The moral line between thrill-seeking cinema-goer and perverted sadistic voyeur is deliberately blurred to the point to where one wonders:
“Why the hell am i watching this ? Am I the sicko ?”
( for example , I walked out of Eli Roth’s ‘Hostel’ 20 mins before the end , and I was only mildly jew-wise at the time, first time I ever walked out of a film at the cinema )
The screaming stays with you forever
But even a sick k-ke bastard like Eli Roth would balk at portraying a screaming, terrified , very young girl being held down by evil-looking black women (often the mother of the child) in a shitty mud-hut in Africa , having her clitoris and labia sliced off with a rusty blade, with no anaesthesia or hygenic procedures in place.
(nor would he dare imagine or depict a “Satanic” ceremony in which a family gathered around as a “Priest” slices off the foreskin of a newborn male baby and sucks the penis until the bleeding has stopped…) And even if he did, the disgusted response from those all-important test-screenings would ensure those scenes be “snipped” and remain on the cutting room floor.
Even the sickest, most gore-hungry horror-film audience isn’t ready for THAT level of depravity)
As recently as 1984, in the UK, it was perfectly legal ( for some people) to take a knife or razorblade to the tender, hypersensitive, nerve-rich flesh of a baby girl’s genitals, and slice off the clitoris (the equivalent of the male glans) the clitoral hood, and the labia (equivalent to the scrotum in the male) without anaesthetic.
This obviously wasn’t because it was not thought BAD or WRONG ,
but because it was FUCKING UNIMAGINABLE TO WHITE EUROPEAN PEOPLE
(like the oft-quoted trope of Queen Vic and lezzers)
In 1985 this was no longer legal, but as of 2018 there has as yet not been ONE successful prosecution against practicioners or enablers of FGM , despite MANY, MANY THOUSANDS of, err “British” females having undergone this barbaric , satanic “procedure”.
“The screaming stays with you forever”
As described by the White ,do-gooder policewoman on Channel 4’s punch-pulling cuckumentary (in which some “communities” felt they were being “unfairly targeted” ):
Type 1 : The clitoris is entirely or partially cut off
Type 2 : Removal of the clitoris , clitoral hood and labia minora
Type 3: Both 1 and 2 , after which, what’s left is then pinned and stitched together
to ‘heal’ , to be sliced open on Lucky Abdul’s wedding night (if he can wait that long)
Maybe with the same knife he cut the cake with ?
4 ) Any other cutting/ slicing injury to genitals , often just a small cut so as to avoid detection by nosey busybodies in the West (RACISTS)
MEANWHILE : WESTERN FEMINISTS whine about saucy adult bum-pinching and succeed in taking millions of pounds taken away from sick and dying children ( see ‘Gropegate’ and “Oxfamgate’ etc) Well done, you rancid twats….maybe YOU are the real ‘mutilated cunts’.
WHITE WESTERN LIBERALS are ‘concerned’ about White parents giving their
shitty over-sugared ,hyperactive, under-exercised spoiled little sprog a light smack on the leg.
But it’s perfectly OK for wymminz to bleat about equality and slap a mans face..
Reality Check: If someone was caught doing this to a dog, or even a rat, , in the UK, they’d have to go into protective custody, with new identities, because millions of angry people would want to bash them to a pulp, with hammers.
As Theberton wisely states : “THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT THE SAME AS US. INTELLECT ASIDE, THEY ARE NEITHER OUR MORAL , SPIRITUAL OR ETHICAL EQUALS.”
A SPOONFUL OF MANURE RUINS A GALLON OF CREAM.
A TEASPOON OF CREAM IMPROVES A GALLON OF MANURE, BUT HARDLY.
some context: Channel 4 10pm ‘The FGM Detectives ‘
‘Filmed over two years, this documentary examines female genital mutilation‘
“Thousands of “British” girls have had their vaginas mutilated. Most are from African and Asian backgrounds ”
“In big cities it’s a tradition in some communities”
“FGM has been illegal in this country for over 30 years, but so far there has been NOT ONE successful prosecution …in Bristol, 2000 girls are at risk ”
(Err..so it’s a Japanese Shinto thing ? Nigerian Catholic? NO. IT’S EXCLUSIVELY A SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN MUSLIM THING, WHICH HAS SPREAD INTO SOME PAKI /ARAB MUSLIM ‘COMMUNITIES’ , VIA THE HALF NEGRO / HALF ARAB SOMALI TYPES )
A WHITE policewoman says:
“If this was happening to LITTLE WHITE GIRLS we wouldnt hear the end of it, people would be running around screaming to get it stopped ”
( ..err..like they did in Rotherham, etc, when YOUNG WHITE GIRLS were being systematically raped, beaten, tortured , branded, etc ? INDEED: IT WAS COVERED UP FOR 15 YEARS AND THOSE TRYING TO EXPOSE IT WERE THREATENED WITH ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT )
“It’s only because it’s a MALE-DOMINATED society, where women arent perceived to be EQUAL TO MEN, that this is overlooked ” she continues
Ah, so it’s a “man thing”. A WHITE MAN thing. It’s our fault.
(THE ACTUAL MUTILATION ITSELF IS USUALLY CARRIED OUT BY WOMEN)
“(BLACK, PAKI, SOMALI MUZZ) Children who are subjected to FGM ( BY THEIR BLACK, AFRICAN, PAKI, MUZZ PARENTS) suffer from extreme PTSD ”
You dont say ?
Finally, three words that should never have formed a sentence:
“BRISTOL’S SOMALI COMMUNITY“
It’s terrible, barbaric and plain evil to take a knife to the genitals of a baby or child. But only if it’s female.
If it’s a boy, it’s a “tradition” a “covenant with G-D”, a “custom” or ,
if that fails, a “necessary medical procedure, goy”
JEW on the left, JEW on the right, JEW in the middle: ‘JEWSNIGHT‘
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMyweUdvHUc
When White Nationalists come to power in the United States, we will create a black homeland on this continent, and we will call it Wakanda.
Let’s make it somewhere south of the United States. Our dreams should be attractive.
At present, all talk of a future white ethnostate is halfway between a plan and a fantasy.
If we are going to fantasize, we might as well have an attractive fantasy, which could eventually become a real plan in the future.
Creating Wakanda on American soil is _not_ an attractive fantasy, especially for anyone who lives in the states imaginatively set aside for blacks.
If we are going to relocate (whether in reality or in our fantasies) blacks to some location apart from us, why not Mexico?
It’s not so far away, and there would be nothing unethical in transporting the Africans now living in America to Mexico. For at least three decades, the Mexican government has been sending their citizens across the southern border. They not only encourage them to leave Mexico and criminally to enter the United States; they also instruct them on how to apply for welfare and how to send their earnings back to their own country. By transporting blacks to Mexico, we would be doing nothing to Mexico that the Mexican government has not already done to us. They send people they don’t want to the United States; we would be sending people we don’t want to Mexico.
Better still, a Wakanda located in Africa itself, which is less practical but more symmetrical, would be a fulfillment of the dream (whether real or rhetorical) of many black nationalist leaders in the past, like Marcus Garvey. Leaders respected by blacks today wanted their people to return to Africa, and we could bring their longstanding dream to fruition. We could then observe the successes, or failures, of the Wakandans from afar, with an ocean between them and us.
As I say, we should make our dreams attractive.
Good points all of them.
I think that there is some poetic justice in placing Wakanda somewhere in the black belt of the old South.
I also think there is some benefit to observing Wakanda close up, but in the age of the internet and high speed air travel, Africa really isn’t that far away.
I think we should forcibly create a livable Black ethnostate in Africa, similar to Liberia, but using covert US rule to insure a maximum possible order and to prevent tribal warlords from taking over. Use a serious talented tenth strategy to run the institutions. Sort of a disguised British imperial rule.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.