Counter-Currents
1,221 words
Immigration has become a major issue in Central Europe since 2015, whereas since the fall of Communism the primary social issue in this region had been emigration . But a lot has changed since the famous “migrant crisis” along the Balkan route — and the faces you see in the streets of Warsaw, Budapest, Prague, and Bratislava are changing, too.
Over a few weeks in the summer of 2015, a veritable migratory route was set up stretching from Turkey and Greece to Hungary, the guardian of the Schengen Zone’s southeastern border. This overland route was organized by networks of smugglers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Before long, almost 10,000 people a day were entering the Schengen area illegally. Overwhelmed by trying to apply the Schengen rules to the letter, Hungary called for help from the European Union — which then denounced Hungary’s xenophobic attitude. Viktor Orbán took a radical step: Within two months he built a border fence, which has since been guarded by the police and the army, with the help of the other countries of the Visegrád Group.
The operation was an immediate success. Illegal immigrants who still tried their luck were systematically sent back to Serbia, and those already in Hungary were transported en masse to the Austrian border one evening in September 2015. The Austrian Chancellor at the time, Werner Faymann, had been criticizing Hungary’s management of the situation, comparing it to Nazi Germany’s methods. He attacked Hungary for not allowing the illegal immigrants to continue their journey westwards. Thus, Hungary ended up bringing them to him.
Since then, the issue of immigration, particularly illegal immigration, has become a permanent political topic in Central Europe. As the countries of the former Eastern bloc began to achieve living standards that were attractive to those from outside our continent who are seeking a “better life,” all the political parties had to take a stand on the subject. With around 90% of the population hostile to immigration from outside Europe, even the progressive and Europeanist parties had to declare themselves at least minimally in favor of border controls.
Which brings us to another facet of the problem, and a far more complex one: legal immigration. Opposition in Berlin and Brussels to the management of the massive influx of illegal immigrants in 2015 led the Central European countries to win the first round of a tug of war. Opposition to redistribution quotas has remained a bone of contention to this day, even if we hear less about it than in 2016. It is also a tool in particular for blackmailing Poland and Hungary, who continue to oppose such quotas head-on, even if it means seeing the funds owed to them by the EU continue to be illegally withheld by the European Commission.
You can buy Alain de Benoist’s Ernst Jünger between the Gods and the Titans here.
It has to be said that neither the Law and Justice party (PiS) in Poland, which faces a difficult election in less than six months’ time, nor Fidesz, which preserved its domination of the Hungarian political arena by getting tough on immigration in 2015, can give up the issue of illegal immigrants. Be that as it may, the pressure exerted by the European institutions on Poland and Hungary over legal immigration continues to grow, and the EU’s two enfants terribles have been forced to relent.
This is because Warsaw and Budapest are being squeezed via illegal blackmail by the European institutions, which are in fact a façade for the German economic machine, which is taking its revenge for the illiberal rebellion of 2015. With billions of euros to these two countries suspended against a backdrop of inflation, the energy crisis ,and a particularly difficult post-COVID recovery, the non-disbursement of NextGen funds is a terribly effective instrument of interference. And at the helm are some miserable histrionics of European politics who are obsessed with sickly immigrationism, such as the German Green MEP Daniel Freund.
In both Poland and Hungary, two countries with both low demographics and low wages who are suffering as a result of structural emigration towards the west, which deprives them of a large part of their workforce, permanent economic growth has automatically brought about a new phenomenon: labor immigration. Although this is indeed a new phenomenon since the fall of Communism, it also existed in the past, especially in Hungary, when these two countries were major regional powers..
Naturally, Ukrainians top the list of legal immigrants who have come to work. As they are culturally, morally, and ethnically fairly close to the natives , especially in Poland, the problems posed by their immigration remain minor. Moreover, throughout Central Europe there is a tradition of living side-by-side with other ethnic groups in the region. Thus, it doesn’t seem shocking that Ukrainian communities are forming here and there, or that some neighborhoods are becoming Ukrainianized.
On the other hand, there has been an explosion in the number of visas issued by Poland and Hungary to countries such as Vietnam, India, Bangladesh, Turkey, Azerbaijan, China, Egypt, and South Korea. Increasing numbers of Arabs and Africans can also be seen in the city centers of the Central European capitals.
While it would be a shameless exaggeration to speak of the “Great Replacement” or “migratory submersion,” there is simply one change that marks a turning point: the countries of Central Europe have become attractive to non-Europeans who are in search of greater material comfort.
This phenomenon is inevitably the result of the draught generated by the labor shortage and a dynamic economy. Yet, we must also take into account pressure from the EU, which has a clear immigrationist agenda. So it seems that the governments of Poland and Hungary have chosen the lesser evil, by choosing to select their immigrants.
Poland issued almost one million residence permits to non-EU citizens in 2021, which is three times as many as France issued during the same year. Hungary, which issued 20,000 permits in 2015, issued 58,000 in 2021. In both cases, Ukrainians received the majority of permits. But the number of non-Europeans has also soared. We likewise know, although the figures are very hard to come by — and you can guess why — that a large proportion of those legal immigrants use Poland and Hungary as gateways to other EU countries.
But let’s not blame Poland and Hungary; it’s EU law that allows this to happen, that same EU which is madly and illegally blackmailing the two countries into accepting more immigrants. Thus, failing to prevent all immigration, Budapest and Warsaw are trying to select as many countries of origin and profiles as possible, doing their best to ensure that such immigration is only for work. The problem is that here, too, EU law imposes family reunification and its related procedures — or rather, often the absence of procedures — for remaining on European soil despite the expiry of a permit, paving the way for greater immigration in the future, including in Central Europe.
In the meantime, precarious industries, such as taxi and delivery services, stand as a stark image of things to come. In less than three years, the vast majority of drivers and deliverymen in Warsaw and Budapest no longer have European features. Several rapes by drivers-for-hire have already taken place in Poland. Same causes, same effects. Central Europe is opening a new chapter in its history in which nothing has yet been written — but this battle will be more difficult than the one against illegal immigration.
The above essay was reprinted from Deliberatio.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
17 comments
I was deeply depressed to see so many Indian and Pakistani delivery drivers when I visited Budapest. I thought it would be a 95%+ white city. Is there any white corner of the earth which the rising tide of color will ever ignore as it seeks to consume ever more resources, fleeing the last place it just destroyed? I hope the next generation of Hungarian and Polish nationalists can recognize the severity of this problem and challenge their governments’ bait and switch opposition to only illegal migration.
There are about 10,000 Indians living in Hungary. Please do not come again, obviously we are unable to meet your expectations.
The irony is, the “German economic machine” named in the article as an instrument of pressure against Hungary and Poland is rapidly declining. I don’t like to say it because I love my country, but in lieu of sane German politicans (and NGOs), maybe that’s a good thing for Europe as a whole.
You are correct about the German economic machine being in decline indeed the EU as a whole is becoming poorer and poorer relative to other regions and as such enormous changes are coming which will see the European nations hopefully going in different trajectories to those our current elites wish
A economically poorer EU with more nationalist populist parties coming to the fore could and can transform the the rotten EU institutions.
The msm politics as usual etc are all in decline and losing credibility all the while more and more European people are waking up and beginning to take our own side.
Interesting times
Interesting times, indeed. We’ll see how this will play out. I’m still holding up some hope for Europe, especially as we do see populist parties gaining ground in the EU right now – but as for Germany, I have the sneaking suspicion they’ll ban the AfD sooner than later.
Yes that is possible but the groundswell amongst ethnic Germans resisting the deconstruction of their country is only growing.
Winds are blowing in favour of European nationalists inspite of all problems we observe.
Thanks .
Unfortunately, the other European countries do not cover themselves with glory to stop the crazy Germans. It’s a pity that this country has to go down first, so that the others still have a chance.
Hear, hear.
The article makes an excellent point.
In August 2001, the government of Australian Prime Minister John Howard refused permission for the MV Tampa to enter Australian waters. The Tampa had rescued about 400 Afghan ‘refugees’, whose leaky fishing vessel had become distressed at sea.
In the mainstream press, Howard was painted as a tough-on-borders hero/monster, depending on the news outlet. Regular, patriotically inclined, voters believed this characterisation and rallied behind Howard, hoping that his stance on the Tampa represented a wider attitude to immigration.
This hope was sorely misplaced. Howard was typical of what Americans call Conservatism Inc. A faithful champion of business interests and big capital, Howard was simultaneously lifting legal immigration to 300,000 people per annum; a new record for Australia at the time. The vast majority of these new migrants were from China, given access to boost economic growth (GDP), address an entirely fake skills shortage, and ‘dampen wages pressure’.
By contrast – and for context – the Labor Party government of Paul Keating had run an immigration program which allowed fewer than 40,000 new entrants per year in the early 90’s.
Howard’s tough on borders image helped him in the polls, but ultimately his duplicity caught up with him. At the 2007 Federal election, the Howard government was defeated and Howard lost his own blue-ribbon seat to Labor. He was only the second sitting Prime Minister in Australia’s history to lose his own seat at an election. The primary reason for his loss was the demographic change – created by his own policies – which saw a higher proportion of Chinese voters turn against Mr Tough-On-Borders in Bennelong.
Refugees and illegal entrants are an issue, but we shouldn’t lose sight of the (often) overlooked and more serious issue of legal immigration; sanctioned and even demanded by global capital.
.
You seem to have immense conceptual difficulty separating the free market economic system from the Big Government program called “population replacement” (aka, “immigration”). The two are, in fact, totally separate concepts and projects. One can have both, but also one without the other: a capitalist-directed economy built on a substrate of economic freedom, strong property rights, sound (non-state/central bank-manipulated) money, limited government regulation, and low taxes, and a policy of zero immigration (or an immigration policy limited to white immigrants). The fact that greedy capitalist enterprises lobby governments for artificial expansions of the labor supply so as to lower unit labor costs (ie, wages) in no way undercuts the iron-clad logic of the economic supremacy of free markets versus planned or controlled economies.
The problem is not “The Market”, but the external, extra-market demographic invasion(s). Failing to understand this only bolsters the Left’s long term strategy of imposing both totalitarian socialism and the unGreat Replacement.
Legal immigration is only as “good” as the laws of whatever country you’re dealing with. America’s immigration laws are a joke and have been since 1965. It pains me to hear that my ancestral homeland of Hungary is going down the same path. My Plan B of emigrating there doesn’t seem like such a promising option now.
Our ancestors were the ones who didn’t leave even in the most difficult times. You clearly wouldn’t be a good fit in this country.
Not if it’s populated with humorless twats like yourself, no.
It isn’t for the most part, fortunately.
I have a few questions. Do you see Third World migration into Hungary as being a problem? Is this migration something that the people want, or just the politicians and Eurocrats? Was the public consulted about whether they approved of changing Hungary’s ethnic composition? If this migration is a problem, then what should be done about it?
Just wait until the globalist hegemons controlling the EHCR arrange for ‘flight from climate change’ to be a valid reason to enter and colonise Europe! Already in Britain we have the absurd situation whereby incomers can claim asylum on the grounds of ‘modern slavery’ i.e having been conveyed into our country by traffickers that they themselves have engaged and paid. And still our courts and even our elected representatives uphold this racket in defiance of the will of the indigenous populace! My feeling is that only the unrest that will result from the oncoming collapse of the post-war Western European social welfare/liberal capitalist dispensation has a chance of turning back the invaders, and only then if a true party of the Right can deliver a forceful stopping blow. Whether our peoples retain the ruthlessness and fortitude to rise to this historical moment is very much in the balance.
We must formulate and then propagate an entirely new understanding of social ethics: the ethics of race; intergenerational obligation; and war.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment