Jew: “And the Romans? Where are they now?”
Tony Soprano: “You’re looking at them, asshole.”
Francis Ford Coppola thought he was out of making Godfather movies in 1974 when he released The Godfather Part II. But Paramount pulled him back in when his 1982 musical One from the Heart bombed, and he needed money. Coppola had a standing offer for another Godfather sequel, so he decided to tell the Michael Corleone story for the third time. The danger, of course, is falling into mechanical derivativeness and farce. Neither sequel entirely avoided those problems, but both succeeded in spite of them.
Mario Puzo, author of the original novel of The Godfather, returned to help Coppola write the screenplay. Al Pacino, Diane Keaton, and Talia Shire reprised their roles. Robert Duvall wanted too much money to return as Tom Hagen, so he was written out of the story. Andy Garcia played Vincent Mancini, Sonny’s illegitimate son; Sophia Coppola played Michael’s daughter, Mary; singer Franc D’Ambrosio played Michael’s son, Anthony; Joe Mantegna played gangster Joey Zasa; and Eli Wallach played the treacherous Don Altobello.
Released in 1990, The Godfather Part III was a critical and commercial success, but everyone agreed that it was not as good as the first one. It is, nevertheless, an excellent film, and in many ways I prefer it to Part II. It is shorter, more artfully directed, and packs a much bigger emotional punch.
The first two movies open with a party at which the don of the Corleone family conducts some business. So as not to be derivative, Part III opens with Michael Corleone writing a letter to his children inviting them to join him at a ceremony in a New York church. Michael’s ongoing quest for legitimacy is approaching its summit: he is being awarded a medal by the Vatican. Next, we see the ceremony in which Archbishop Gilday awards the medal. (This scene was cut from the rerelease of the film, which is a pity, because it is splendid.)
Then we see the party. Unlike the party in Part II, this time there is Sicilian music and a performance from Johnny Fontaine, which returns us to the first movie. It seems more authentic, but that’s because Michael’s quest for legitimacy has brought him closer to his Catholic and Italian roots. At the party, we see how Michael earned his medal from the Vatican: the Corleone family donates $100 million to the church to help the poor of Sicily.
Naturally, Michael also conducts some family business at the party. His smug liberal WASP ex-wife Kay wishes to announce that their son Anthony is quitting law school to become an opera singer. And although Michael has now gotten out of business with the mafia, the mafia very much wants to stay in business with him. First, Don Altobello wants to donate a million dollars to the Vito Corleone Foundation. Then Joey Zasa comes to Michael about a beef with his nephew Vincent Mancini. Michael tries, and fails, to mediate between them. In fact, matters only get worse.
The opening scenes nicely set up the main conflict of the film: Michael seeking to trade mafia entanglements for legitimacy while the mafia has other ideas. But both Zasa and Mancini are crudely realized. Mancini is particularly problematic. He is established as a dangerous hot head like his father Sonny, but he doesn’t seem to have many virtues to balance that out. As for Zasa, he’s supposed to be a media-savvy dandy, so why cast an ugly actor with no charisma? Perhaps Coppola wanted him to be contemptible.
Archbishop Gilday is the head of the Vatican Bank. Under his watch, 769 million dollars have been embezzled. He asks Michael to help the bank become solvent again. If Michael will deposit $600 million, Gilday will transfer the Vatican’s 25% share of Immobiliare, a real-estate conglomerate worth $6 billion. (How is this even possible?)
Naturally, when Michael’s old mafia buddies hear about the deal, they want to “wet their beaks” a little. This would defeat Michael’s whole purpose, which is to go legit. So he comes up with a way to placate the old dons. He asks Don Altobello to set up a meeting of “the Commission” in a rooftop pavilion at an Atlantic City casino. At the meeting, Michael announces that he is not including the dons in the Immobiliare deal, but he has now completely liquidated his casino holdings and has their final checks for their investments, which Vincent passes out. (One don mentions that his check is for $50 million. $600 million here, $100 million there, now hundreds of millions more. Michael really has a lot of cash.)
Joey Zasa then makes an angry speech about how he feels like he is getting no “respect.” It is a string of mafia movie clichés, and it is not exactly clear what his beef is. He apparently didn’t invest in the casinos, so he has no reason to get a payout. Is he upset because he cannot invest in Immobiliare? Maybe. In any case, he storms out. Don Altobello follows to placate him. Soon, they hear the sound of a helicopter. From it, machine guns fire into the pavilion. Michael, Vincent, and Corleone assassin Al Neri manage to escape. But most of the dons are killed.

You can preorder The Best of Trevor Lynch here
It is all very cinematic, but it makes no sense. Zasa is clearly behind it. Did he go into the meeting planning to kill everyone? Or did he always keep a helicopter on standby, in case he decided to massacre his colleagues? And why? Honestly, Michael had a much stronger motive, namely to rid himself of his old mafia ties. Of course, if he planned to kill them, he wouldn’t have handed them checks immediately beforehand. Nor would he have allowed himself to be locked in the room when the guns went off. The whole thing is as incoherent as the assassination plot in Part II.
In the aftermath of the hit, Michael has a diabetic stroke and lapses into a coma. This plot twist seems very arbitrary. It is clearly modeled on Vito Corleone’s hospitalization in the first film, during which Michael comes into his own and assassinates two of the men who tried to kill his father. While Michael is sick, Vincent assassinates Joey Zasa with the help of Al Neri and the approval of Michael’s sister Connie. But unlike Michael’s transformation in the first film, we see no real deepening of Vincent’s character.
After Michael recovers, the action then switches to Italy. This for me is where the film really takes off. The Immobiliare deal needs the approval of the Pope but is put on hold when he falls gravely ill. Michael’s son Anthony will also have his operatic debut as Turiddu in Pietro Mascagni’s Cavalleria Rusticana at the Theatro Massimo in Palermo.
Michael begins to suspect that Archbishop Gilday and associates are swindling him. He asks the advice of an old family friend, Don Tommasino, with whom he is staying in Sicily. Don Tommasino recommends that Michael speak to Cardinal Lamberto, a man with connections who is also a man of conscience.
This is one of my favorite scenes. It is set on a cold morning in a cloister filled with rose bushes. Lamberto, played by the former footballer and movie heartthrob Raffaele Vallone, is a man of great dignity. To explain what Michael is up against, Cardinal Lamberto takes a stone from a fountain:
Look at this stone. It has been lying in the water for a very long time, but the water has not penetrated it. [He breaks the stone against the side of the fountain, revealing its inside.] Look. Perfectly dry. The same thing has happened to men in Europe. For centuries they have been surrounded by Christianity, but Christ has not penetrated. Christ doesn’t breathe within them.
What were the Italians before Christianity? They were Romans. The Godfather Part III is Coppola’s celebration of the paganism of the Roman Catholic Church, the Corleone family, and Italian culture in general. This pagan sensibility is reflected in the film’s sumptuous settings and costumes. Rich reds and warm browns predominate, as well as gold, copper, and bronze. Most of the architecture is renaissance, baroque, and neoclassical. But if Lamberto is right, it doesn’t have to be ancient Roman, for Rome never ended and is present in all later styles.
What is Rome? It is grandeur and luxury. It is sensuous, cynical, avaricious, clannish, and proud. It is violent and vengeful. It is the inversion of everything Jesus blesses in his Sermon on the Mount. It is the Corleones.
Of course a cardinal would claim that bad businessmen are “unchristian”, but there’s nothing Roman about the people behind the swindle: a drab Swiss banker named Frederick Keinszig (Helmut Berger) and the even drabber Don Licio Lucchesi (Enzo Robutti), who is as smug, slow-moving, and uncharismatic as a lizard in the sun. Archbishop Gilday’s offices look like renaissance ballrooms. By comparison, Lucchesi’s lair looks like an accountant’s office.
Michael has reason to suspect Don Altobello of being in cahoots with Zaza based on his convenient departure before the gunfire began. But Michael also comes to believe that Altobello answers to Lucchese, who was ultimately behind the attack on the Commission. But why? What was his motive? Was it to prevent Michael from taking over Immobiliare? But why would he want the Vatican bank to fail? Why would he kill the other dons?
Michael’s inference that Lucchesi is behind Altobello is similar to Vito’s inference in the first film that Don Barzini was behind Philip Tattaglia and Virgil Sollozzo’s attacks on him and his family. But in the first movie, Barzini’s motive was clear (an interest in the narcotics trade), and there was plausible evidence for Vito’s conclusion (the way Barzini ran the peace conference). In Part III, all such considerations are fudged. It is bad screenwriting.
When Michael comes to Sicily, Lucchese and Altobello hire an assassin to kill him. Why? When the assassin kills Don Tommasino, an ailing Michael hands control of the Corleone family to Vincent, who then arranges both Michael’s protection and the assassination of the family enemies.
As in the first movie, the assassinations take place during an important family event: in the first movie, the baptism of Connie’s son, in Part III, Anthony’s operatic debut. Opera, of course, was born in Italy as a conscious revival of pagan Greek and Roman drama. Matters are complicated by the fact that Michael’s enemies are hunting him while he is hunting them. It is a bravura sequence, even better than in the original film. In The Godfather, the mood was merely bitterly ironic, whereas The Godfather Part III ends in gut-wrenching tragedy.
Intercut with a stunning staging and performance of Cavalleria Rusticana, Al Neri kills Archbishop Gilday, who is hilariously depicted skulking through the Vatican after hours in a purple robe and miter. Obviously this is unrealistic, but Coppola does not care. Gilday has to look like a chessman being retired from the board. Keinszig is murdered by hanging, but it is staged to look like a suicide. Lucchesi is killed with his own dork eyewear by one of Don Tommasino’s loyal retainers on a suicide mission. And Don Altobello is dispatched at the opera by Connie, his goddaughter, who gives him a box of poisoned cannoli. The sly old don invites her to take the first bite, which she does with no ill effect. She either knew where the poison was, had ingested an antidote, or knew that a single bite would not harm her.
Unfortunately, the new Pope is murdered with poison tea. The subtle suggestion that Archbishop Gilday is responsible is a beautiful touch. Lucchesi’s assassin manages to kill three of Michael’s bodyguards but fails to shoot him in the opera house. However, when the Corleones depart, the killer strikes. Michael is wounded, but Mary is killed. It is a shocking and utterly heartbreaking scene, as grandly staged on the steps of the opera house as the spectacle we have just witnessed inside. The movie should have ended here, but a brief anticlimax is tacked on of an aged Michael in Don Tommasino’s garden.
I have already pointed out some weaknesses of the script. Some plot elements don’t make sense (the financial deal, the assassination of the dons, the attempt to assassinate Michael). Characters like Vincent and Zasa are developed sketchily.
Another problem is a lack of great turns of phrase like “an offer you can’t refuse” or “keep your friends close and your enemies closer.” The closest Part III comes to a great line is the scene where Michael laments, “Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in.”
As for the actors, Pacino is adequate but flat. Keaton is effective as a bitch, but is she even acting? Eli Wallach is excellent as Don Altobello. Franc D’Ambrosio is very good as Anthony Corleone and has a fantastic voice. Andy Garcia is flat as Vincent Mancini. Joe Mantegna is poor casting for Joey Zasa. Most of the minor characters are well done, however.
Coppola’s daughter Sophia was widely reviled as Mary, but I honestly don’t agree. Granted, there is little chemistry between her and Vincent, even though they are supposed to be kissing cousins. But it takes two to tango, and honestly I think Andy Garcia was the weaker of the two.
Amusingly, Coppola was also accused of nepotism for casting Sophia. He also cast his sister Talia Shire as Connie, his uncle Anton Coppola as the opera conductor, and his father Carmine Coppola as the band leader (he also wrote and arranged music for the score). Frankly, a bit of nepotism in a mafia movie just adds to the realism.
Much to my surprise, my favorite character is Talia Shire’s Connie. We barely even register Connie’s face in the first two films, but here she is both a compelling presence and an agent who gains in power as Michael fades. Connie is the most pagan character in the film. She is also the best-dressed. Her jewelry looks Etruscan or Roman. She is a scheming, vengeful noblewoman from the pages of Italian history: a Livia or Lucretia Borgia or Catherine de’ Medici. Her murder of Don Altobello could have been scripted by Suetonius.
Nino Rota, who composed the scores of the first two Godfather films, died in 1979. Thus the director’s father, Carmine Coppola, took over the music, creating new cues and new arrangements of Rota’s classic themes. Aside from the opera at the end, there are other scenes where characters sing. At the party scene, Connie leads the crowd in singing “Eh Cumpari” and Johnny Fontaine sings “To Each His Own.” Later, in Sicily, Anthony sings “Bruccia La Terra” to Nino Rota’s original Godfather theme. It is gorgeous and heartbreaking. After his disastrous musical One from the Heart, Coppola still can’t resist characters who burst into song. I wish he had indulged this side of himself even more.
The Godfather Part III is far from perfect, but the movie is so beautiful to look at and listen to, and Coppola’s direction is so compelling, that it is easy to forget about the flaws. My gut feeling is that Coppola was so confident of his vision and his ability to sell it that he refused to get bogged down in some of the details. Thus it makes sense that the last nearly 40 minutes of the film center on an opera house. Opera is notorious for weak plots, but fans are willing to overlook them because of the sheer magic of the music and the spectacle.
The Godfather Part III is Coppola’s tribute to the undying paganism of Italian culture. For most of us, high tragic drama is confined to the stage and screen. But for some, like the Corleones, it becomes real life.
Enjoyed this article?
Leave a tip in the jar!
So far we have a running amount of $3,00
Related
-
Meet Me Tonight In Atlantic City
-
Dirty Northern Bastards The Damned United
-
Ladies and Gentlemen, The Fabulous Stains: a Charming Punk Rock Time Capsule
-
The Name of the Highest Peak in North America
-
The Wettest County: Lawless
-
Leopards, Jackals, and Sheep
-
Alex Jones’ Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement, Part 1
-
I’m Still Here: Repression and Remembrance in Brazil
16 comments
Later, in Sicily, Anthony sings “Bruccia La Terra” to Nino Rota’s original Godfather theme. It is gorgeous and heartbreaking.
I think that’s my favorite scene in the entire movie. It put that song in a whole new light for me. It really hits you there how much Michael loved Apollonia.
And yeah, I couldn’t agree more re the film itself: it is massively underrated. And Sophia Coppola may not have put in some grand Oscar-worthy performance, but she did exactly what her role called for and seemed believable in it precisely because of her awkwardness–she’s playing a young, nervous girl, which is exactly what she was. Anything more would have seemed inauthentic, I think.
Yes, she is perfect as a young, naive girl at the start of her adult life. I think a lot of the critical ire was due to the fact the Coppola replaced Winona Ryder with Sophia. Ryder is no great actress, but she was a member of the tribe, thus it is no surprise that the likes of Maltin panned her replacement. Ryder was replaced, though, because she had a breakdown due to exhaustion. It was not a slight to her acting.
Pretty sure Robert Duvall didn’t price himself out simply because wanted more money. I heard that he initially turned down the role either because he didn’t believe in the project or didn’t like the script. Either way, Coppola kept pestering him to sign on anyway. And to finally get Coppolla to buzz off, Duvall simply presented a figure that was much higher than the film producers could afford.
On Bob and Tom the radio show Robert Duvall stated, “It is alright for Al Pacino to make twice as much money as me but not three times as much.” Bob went on to list his own accomplishments and he was right.
I bet he was too polite/diplomatic to say so, but he’s also a better actor. Any day of the week, actually.
I didn’t like his last movie with James Franco, Wild Horses which promoted homosexuality.
Vincent is the reason why I never liked this film. It’s refreshing to see someone else find his character obnoxious. The character is incredibly unlikable and I felt it was due at least in part to Anthony Garcia’s horrible acting. Sophia Coppola wasn’t bad and she behaved exactly how a young girl would. I didn’t know about the Winona Ryder thing, but the complaining about Sophia Coppola just seems like a standard accepted take about the movie. You know you really show how much you care about the art of acting by crapping on her. It’s the brain dead midwit take that is basically saying “I saw this movie. I have good taste because I dislike this character.”
If I had been Michael, I would have let Zasa whack Vincent. The biting incident in Michael’s house was the behavior of an animal incapable of thinking about the consequences of his actions for the people around him. What if a gun battle had erupted in a house full of women and children? Especially on a day in which Michael was celebrating his long battle to rise above people like that. Vincent was just too dangerous to keep around.
When I saw Scorsese’s Mean Streets, I thought for sure that the Keitel character’s rite of passage would be to realize that his friend, played by De Niro, was a liability and needed to be whacked.
That lesson was saved, in a way, for Goodfellas and Casino.
What is Rome? It is grandeur and luxury. It is sensuous, cynical, avaricious, clannish, and proud. It is violent and vengeful.
I have not seen the movie The Great Beauty (Italy; 2013), which takes place in Rome, but a person of my acquaintance says he thinks it’s about “the greatness of western civilization”. That sounded a tad pompous to me, but maybe I should take a crack at it anyway.
Have you seen The Great Beauty, and might the above viewpoint be somewhat correct? As far as I can figure, from reading, this movie touches at least a bit on what you have to say about Rome, though I’d add “overripe” to your list of adjectives (above).
From Criterion:
Jep unexpectedly finds himself taking stock of his life, turning his cutting wit on himself and his contemporaries, and looking past the lavish nightclubs, parties, and cafés to find Rome itself, in all its monumental glory: a timeless landscape of absurd, exquisite beauty.
It is on my shelf, but I have not yet watched it.
The backstory in Godfather III involving deep state echelon skullduggery surrounding the Vatican appears to be based on the Propaganda Due (P2) affair. P2 was a clandestine Italian Masonic lodge participating in anti-communist activities during the 1970s and was allegedly involved in the collapse of the Vatican associated Banco Ambrosiano. High ranking people both in Italy and on the international scene were adjacent.
Spinoffs involved allegations of P2 collaboration with three letter agencies, organized crime, money laundering and false flag attacks. There was also the 1978 death of Pope John Paul I who was investigating…things. His papacy lasted one month before he died of a heart attack. Robert Anton Wilson of Illuminatus fame has a few things to say about P2 in his compendium Everything Is Under Control: Conspiracies, Cults and Cover-ups. All just conspiracy theory, right?
On 18 June 1982 Roberto Calvi, chairman of Banco Ambrosiano, was found hanged under Blackfire’s Bridge in London, his pockets stuffed with cash. Initially ruled a suicide, later suspected as a ritual execution, and would anyone make a movie about this sort of thing?
Thanks for all that juicy info regarding P2. So I guess GF III could be called fictionalized history.
There is also the clash between the Sicilian Mafia and the Italian-American one for control of narcotrafficking, which, according to Salvatore Lupo, the foremost expert on the matter, is the real reason behind the hecatomb of the 1980s.
(The relevance of the P2 is in general wildly exagerated)
The young upcoming Don is schooled in the recipe of how power works when he humbles himself as being inexperienced to the old Don who tells him its very simple,
“Finance is a gun, politics is knowing when to pull the trigger” – Don Luchessi
Raffaele Vallone is from Tropea a very ancient beautiful place and in a province where the most powerful mob (Ndrangheta) still has a presence, and influences in a good part of the world.
“But in the first movie, Barzini’s motive was clear (an interest in the narcotics trade), and there was plausible evidence for Vito’s conclusion (the way Barzini ran the peace conference). In Part III, all such considerations are fudged. It is bad screenwriting.”
Not really because it reflects reality. Altobello never plays his hand like Barzini which is the smart way to go,, even if you think the movie audience don’t get it, but again it’s made clear.
“And the Romans? Where are they now?” (despite their presence everywhere)
The spirit, willpower, and strength of the old Roman ethics has never died in Italy, they just have historically coincided with the greatest spirits of empathy ever exhibited anywhere else (and of course for the innocent). As an Italian General once told me, we are the last bastion of true Christianity.
Can you elaborate on the whole Italian/Roman paganism thing?
I enjoyed the dialogue from The Sopranos in the openning line of the article. Godfather III has been the butt of many jokes. I recall watching one and two. One of course is a classic and tough act to follow. Two I recall being good but not in the league of one. Brando as Vito Corleone is simply the kino of kino. I think I’ve seen bits of three but mainly recall it being the punchline of jokes for how bad it was.
Not sure of your question, but I think paganism and Christianity both exemplify the cultures drive to believe in something bigger than themselves regardless of their actions throughout history. Something watching over us and eventually bringing us to atonement for our actions. There is even a fear of offending supernatural forces when they move from paganism to christian belief which is why they maintain the same holiday dates only to rename them and continue pagan practices from saints, Halloween, to performing the “evil eye” curing method. It is highly inspiring to have a special force behind you. The Legions had mythical creatures and gods blessing their standards for strength and protection.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.