When I’m trying to gauge whether a person is a friend or an enemy, I usually ask him to describe to me his victory state — which is to say, what will the world look like when he has won and no longer has to engage in politics (or at least, that of the radical revolutionary kind)? Most people I’d describe as friends have victory states which have no place for Jews in the lands of Europeans. Not even the based Jews, sorry.
The positive vision of a Europe of ethnostates is specifically a vision that excludes Jews, for reasons both racial and historical. Not only are they an alien racial presence which shouldn’t be in Europe as well as Europe’s overseas colonies, but they’re also a problematic presence which has historically undermined European states and has attempted to destroy the European people. So, no Jews in Europe. But another question, of course, poses itself almost immediately: What do we do with the Jews already in the lands of Europeans?
The most obvious solution would be to ship them all to Israel. This solution goes well with the pan-nationalist approach, which advocates granting each nation a state of their own as a matter of principle. The overseas Jews could be sent to Israel, which exists as a Jewish ethnostate securing the existence of the Jewish people and a future for their children. This is, of course, the favorite solution for any other non-white ethnicity living in European lands, and it’s not even that controversial. Already we’re seeing in Europe talk of repatriating the migrants from the 2015 migration wave by sources closer to the mainstream than I’d have expected seven years ago, when the most recent wave started. Germany for the Germans, Turkey for the Turks, Sweden for the Swedes, Morocco for the Moroccans, France for the French, Algeria for the Algerians. Sounds like a fair deal, doesn’t it? Why not Israel for the Jews?
In a recent conversation I had about the subject, I irreverently described my position vis-à-vis Israel thusly: I oppose garbage in the streets, therefore I support building and maintaining a landfill. So, if we are White Nationalists and we seek to rid our nations of Jews, we need to find a place to dump them. Of course, if Israel is destroyed as a result of pressure from the Muslim world, that would mean that there would be no place to dump Jews anymore. Sure, we could try sending them to Madagascar, or maybe Birobidzhan (the Jewish Autonomous Oblast in Russia), but both those places would be glorified shtetls. Then we’d be back to the same problem our ancestors faced before 1948: streets full of garbage and no landfill to dump it in. This is how the anti-Semitic case for Israel usually goes. Maybe if we can dump all the Jews there, it could be worth the $5 billion in aid (give or take) plus the diplomatic and security costs to continue propping up a Jewish state in the Middle East.
In theory, Israel is where the Jews are supposed to go and bother us no longer. In practice, this has not worked out so well. Indeed, since the creation of Israel, Jewish interference in European nations’ affairs has not decreased but has in fact increased, culminating in the takeover of the US foreign policy establishment by a cabal of Straussian neoconservative Jews in the early 2000s. Their Project for a New American Century was aimed at instrumentalizing America’s immense military, economic, and diplomatic power for achieving Israeli foreign policy objectives. It is precisely the influence of the Jewish state in the Middle East which has turned the region away from secular Arab nationalism, which looked towards securing the existence of the various Arabic-speaking nations of the region, and toward militant and expansionist Islamist fundamentalism, which looks outwards towards infidel Europe as the great enemy and seeks to conquer it. The Jewish diaspora’s subversive activities have intensified to the point that it’s no longer possible to find much in the way of healthy tissue in the West, as well as no cultural institution that hasn’t been taken over by them and isn’t being used to beat the white population into submission. In other words, we’re paying massive municipal dues for a supposed state-of-the-art landfill, but our streets are still full of garbage. It’s enough to make a concerned citizen consider taking action.
![](https://counter-currents.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Savitri-Lightning-Mock2-200x300.jpg)
You can buy Savitri Devi’s The Lightning and the Sun here.
We’ve yet to see a white nation with a government that has strongly suggested to its Jewish population that they bugger off to Israel — or else. We therefore do not know how Jews, diaspora or Israeli, would react to such a measure. We do, however, know that when the Third Reich attempted to forge trade links with Jewish leaders in the British Mandate of Palestine, the response from world Jewry was to overwhelmingly attack the Reich. This was at a stage when the Reich was not interested in exterminating Jews (if it ever was, but that’s a story for another day), but merely sought to remove them from the German national body, and it evidently attempted doing so through diplomacy. Thus, it can be reasonably concluded that the motivation behind Jewish subversive and anti-white activity isn’t a lack of a homeland to call their own, but rather a lust for power over gentile nations in general and white nations in particular. In other words, what Jews stand to lose is the privileged position they hold in the West today, which they prioritize over the position that the erstwhile counter-Semitic Zionist plans for them as citizens of the Jewish ethnostate of Israel. The Jews can therefore be expected to fight tooth and nail against their removal from this privileged position, and ultimately against their physical removal from white societies.
There’s also the delusional belief long held by some Rightists in the West that if the Jews were given a land for their nation and cease being stateless people that they’d turn into a normal people. This is a belief that is shared with the founders of Zionism, notably Theodor Herzl and the first Prime Minister of Israel, David Ben-Gurion. This is an attitude popular among people who deny the essential immutability of national and racial belonging, and thereby conflate nationality with behavioral complexes. The torturing of the definition of “Jew” into meaning either “Woody Allen lookalike” or “Hasidim” is what allows for flights of fancy such as the legendary 4chan post where an Israeli anon claimed that “Israel is the country closest to becoming 110” — which is to say, the 110th jurisdiction in history to have expelled its Jews, reflecting the Israeli’s state tensions with its Orthodox Jewish minority population, that refuses to pay taxes, serve in the Israel Defense Forces, recognize the Tel Aviv regime as legitimate, or even speak Hebrew (they insist on speaking Yiddish), all the while hoovering up massive subsidies for their kibbutzim.
Personally, I don’t like using the term “normal,” but I believe it’s fair to say that the Jews do not live like other nations. They’re the most diasporic of the diaspora nations. Other nations live in a similar small homeland/powerful diaspora duality, notably their fellow Eastern Mediterraneans: the Greeks, the Lebanese, and the Armenians. Greek and Armenian influence may be significant in the West, but the Armenians don’t have the clout to even have their own genocide at the hands of the Ottoman Empire recognized as such, to say nothing of enshrining it as a cultural and legal cornerstone of Western Civilization.
There’s an argument to be made that the overseas Chinese and Indians have similar behavioral patterns as diaspora Jews, even as China and India themselves are vast, internationally respected, and powerful states, but it is only the Jews who have achieved hegemonic cultural and political control over a foreign civilization. Much though the Chinese and Indians may want to replicate this success in the West, the Chinese in Australia and Canada, and the Indians in America’s tech industry, consistently they find that the Jews are always one step ahead of them and that they simply do not have the knack for developing a culture of critique to suit their own needs. None of this is changing because the Jews now have their own state. Farming and soldiering will not turn Grima Wormtongue into Aragorn — or Sam Gamgee, for that matter. The Jewish behavioral complex is downstream of Jewish biology.
And so we’ve come to the stage where we switch metaphors. We have to see Israel not as a landfill where we dump our unwanted Jews, but as a pirate cove where Jewish pirates seek shelter. It’s not even a question of dual loyalty as much as the Jewish behavioral complex itself, which uses the rights and privileges of Israel as a sovereign state for the purpose of undermining and subverting other nations as well as retaining Jews’ privileged position in the world. We’re therefore back to the Jew himself as a problem — not Israel, not Zionism, not even the ill-conceived Zionist fantasies of American Evangelical Protestants, but the Jewish nation itself as a social and biological entity. We’re back to the drawing board.
What the hell do we do with these people?
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
14 comments
You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here….
Personally, I’m glad that Israel exists. They’re over there, we’re over here, and everyone is happier that way. (If the country collapsed, they’d all show up on our doorsteps, of course.) The major problem is that their relatives abroad are playing their host nations for chumps. They need to knock it off.
I don’t think they can, even if they wanted to.
It’s a thorny problem, of course. However, I don’t think it’s hopeless. They simply need to get the proper motivation to behave themselves, one way or another.
The “State of Israel” was the worst British creation. It was a disgusting crime.
Britain facilitated the Satanic Zionist capture and colonization of the Arab land; a hundred years or so later her own highest offices are controlled by the likes of Sadiq Khan, Priti Patel, Sajid Javed, and Rishi Sunak, etc.
The Palestinians indeed did get a raw deal. Still, by far, the worst British creation ever, up to now and ever into eternity, is the Teletubbies.
I don’t disavow that Palestinians want their land back but woe to the conquered. I think what makes a lot of wignats butt hurt about Israel is that Jews won their land through Indo-European style campaigns of blood and iron. I’m sure a lot of people here won’t like to hear this, but I think white nationalism and Jewish nationalism (Zionism) are mirror images of each other.
The worst British invention in the Near/Middle East ever is the Wahhabism, created by the British spy Mr. Hempher 300 years ago.
@Kök Böri
The worst British invention in the Near/Middle East ever is the Wahhabism, created by the British spy Mr. Hempher 300 years ago.
Zionism and Wahhabism are siblings.
And, indeed, they share a common progenitor [British colonial/political administration].
Angst and perplexity shared.
“What the hell do we do with these people?”
AH was right in his planning. The only way is to subdue them by force and then send them collectively to live in a faraway place by and among themselves in an isolated and monitored state. It all boils down to whether or not the White people will be capable of getting it done.
I should also add that the kid under arrest in the heading picture really needs to lay off the soy. He makes Tevye the Milkman look like Rambo by comparison.
Well, I guess Tevye’s wish came true. He became a rich man (and got fat).
Great essay, Nick. You have arrived at that sublime state where ‘the Jewish Question’ reaches it’s final conceptual resting place. Either one believes in race or one does not. If one believes in race, eventually one comes upon the Jews and what they mean as a race with regard to our race (and all other races). Can we leave the vicious dog that has bitten us many, many times to wander free? Even with the promise of staying in their own back-yard? Is there any morality that transcends race that can make any promise between races meaningful in the absence of deterrence? When we put aside the notion of ‘universal rights’ and ‘universal morality’ along with ‘universal man’, we are left with what? Force and it’s analogs? I don’t think we have to answer these kinds of questions before we can actually see the horizon where we might have the power to act on our decisions. But I think it’s fair to say that every serious ‘race man’ is going arrive the point of asking Nick’s question: What do we do with these people?
There’s an argument to be made that the overseas Chinese and Indians have similar behavioral patterns as diaspora Jews, even as China and India themselves are vast, internationally respected, and powerful states, but it is only the Jews who have achieved hegemonic cultural and political control over a foreign civilization.
The comparison with Indians and Chinese is correct, but only in relation to Indians. The overseas Chinese, the Huaqiao, are not much different from the Jews in terms of their influence on the economy, politics, science, military affairs, and culture of other countries, where they live. Chinese communities support the Maoist government in Beijing, the second- and third-generation Chinese Americans are willing to cooperate with Chinese intelligence, as was well described by the American writer David Wise in his book “The Tiger Trap”. Chinese communities have great economic influence and are able to collect donations for American politicians. For example, Bill Clinton’s second presidential campaign received a lot of money from Chinese sponsors. In terms of culture, it’s been a long time since Hollywood made a film critical of Chinese politics (the last was probably Seven Years in Tibet with Brad Pitt, but it was also directed by a Frenchman). If the Chinese don’t watch American movies, then Hollywood will go bankrupt. If the Italians or Ukrainians do not watch them, it does not matter. Therefore, in films you can criticize white Americans, you can criticize the British, French, Germans, Russians, Türks and Qazaqs, but you cannot criticize the Chinese. The Chinese diasporas are acting in unison with the mainland Chinese in this, and also in many other issues.
So the difference with the Jews here is only in degree, and that is the difference in time. The Jews have been living in the Diaspora for two thousand years, while the Chinese have appeared in large numbers in Europe, the USA, and Asia (not including the Far East itself and the rimlands and islands of Southeast Asia, such as Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore), relatively recently. They are still ahead. And given the industriousness and loyalty of the Chinese, they will be able to rule the world much more effectively and harshly than any Jews that anti-Semites can think of.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment