A man defends his store from the roof during the 1992 LA riots.
1,336 words
Asians now fear walking the streets in San Francisco and Oakland. Locals continue to rob and assault them without warning. Assailants even target the elderly. The national media, which prefers to ignore crime waves, is horrified by this spate of attacks.
Left out of the coverage is the fact that pretty much all of the assailants are black. Instead, the attacks are blamed on whites, Donald Trump, and xenophobia. “Former President Donald Trump fueled anti-Asian sentiment during the Covid-19 pandemic by using discriminatory rhetoric to describe the coronavirus, and may have contributed to the racist and violent attacks across the United States,” declared Human Rights Watch.
“Oftentimes, perpetrators have used the exact language of the prior president, words like ‘Wuhan virus, kung flu, China virus, China plague,’” California Asian leader Manju Kulkarni told NPR. “And sometimes they have even weaponized the former president himself, saying ‘Trump is going to get you, go back to your country.’”
Vice President Kamala Harris also blamed the usual targets. “Hate crimes and violence against Asian Americans and Asian immigrants have skyrocketed during the pandemic,” she tweeted. “That’s why our Administration has taken actions to address these xenophobic attacks. We must continue to commit ourselves to combating racism and discrimination.”
The Biden administration’s actions to tackle the attacks involve no crackdown on crime. Instead, the administration just banned government officials from calling Covid the “Wuhan flu.”
Some Asians are taking proactive measures and forming community patrols to protect their vulnerable members. Many in the community want more policing and tougher enforcement. Other Asians, however, are exploiting the opportunity to demonstrate that they’re oppressed POC and need to show solidarity with blacks. Asian Americans Advancing Justice president John C. Yang says it’s now time for his people to link arms with blacks to find the root causes of the attacks, opposing increased policing because it will harm blacks: “An increased police presence isn’t necessarily going to solve the problem,” he told NBC News. “We worry about over-criminalization of communities. . . . We could develop community-based solutions — assistance for the victims, assistance for the businesses that are damaged.”
Blacks approve this message. “We’re not going to allow any narratives that disrupt the relationship that the Black and Asian community has,” social justice minister Cherri Murphy said at a solidarity rally last weekend.
You can buy It’s Okay to Be White: The Best of Greg Johnson here.
Asians rarely get opportunities to present themselves as the victims of racism. They have to go back in history to find examples in America. Many of the news articles brought up the “yellow peril” from the late 19th century, Chinese immigration restriction, and Japanese internment. So-called experts connect these trends to the current attacks. Apparently, black youths who dropped out of middle school are inspired by past white opposition to Oriental coolieism. Obviously, it’s a way to deflect blame from blacks onto whites. Blacks are our nation’s eternally blameless gods — the white man is always responsible for whatever blacks may do wrong.
Asians know it’s better to blame whites than the actual culprits. Pointing the finger at blacks opens them up to charges of racism and puts them into the category of deplorables. It will not gain them status or sympathy with the mainstream media. It’s much better for them to blame Trump and “systemic racism.” This places them firmly in the grand non-white coalition against the historic American nation and increases their moral status. It also diminishes claims that Asians are privileged and no different from whites. Asians and their conservative simps were outraged a few months ago when it was discovered a Washington school places this group in the same category as whites. No greater outrage can ever be conceived than to deny Asians their rightful place among the POC.
Asians earn more and are more educated than every other group. It’s hard to say how they face any discrimination outside of classmates slanting their eyes and shouting “Ching-Chong!” America has been good to Asians, but that’s not convincing this group to side with whites. Only 30% of Asians voted for Trump in the 2020 election. This demographic leans left on pretty much every social issue and they were repelled by Trump’s immigration rhetoric. Many Asians are leaders on the woke Left and younger, more assimilated Asians are more likely to support Leftist fads.
The one area where Asians find themselves discriminated against is in college admissions. The Ivy League rejects several Asian applicants in favor of less-qualified black and Hispanic applicants. The Trump administration sued Yale over its affirmative action practices that disadvantage Asian and white students last year. The Biden administration has since ended this lawsuit. Even though affirmative action hurts Asians, American-born Asians are far more likely to support it than their immigrant parents. They’re assimilated enough to know it is declasse to oppose affirmative action.
Conservatives still prefer to talk about Asians as the true victims of affirmative action rather than whites. You will rarely see an article in National Review or Washington Examiner that decries affirmative action as anti-white. It’s only castigated for being anti-Asian. National Review offered a recent example of this in a critique of the Biden administration. Yukong Zhao, president of the Asian American Coalition for Education, wrote for the conservative outlet that the White House fails in its pledge to defend Asians from discrimination by no longer contesting Yale’s racial preferences.
While affirmative action is bad because it harms whites and elevates unqualified non-whites, its discrimination against Asians may be the one good thing about it. We don’t want to live in a society run by assimilated Asian bugmen. Our country would probably be in even worse shape if Ivy League schools allowed more Asians in. They would likely take the spots of the few white gentiles admitted rather than the space reserved for blacks. The meritocracy is in part how we got to our present mess. The thought of Indians and Chinese fully taking over all of our elite institutions is horrifying. In our ideal society, we would want these quotas to ensure our elites remain largely like us. That would mean putting Asians at a disadvantage when it came to admissions.
The Ivy League is corrupt and should be destroyed, but not because it doesn’t allow Asians to dominate admissions. The “affirmative action discriminates against Asians” line is only useful insofar as it helps whites. If it leads to Asians becoming 50 percent of the student body, as it is at the University of California-Berkeley, then it does nothing to help whites. We still can’t get into these good schools, but now it’s because Asians rather than unqualified blacks gobble up the spots.
The anti-Asian crime wave in the Bay Area deserves similar nuance. If it convinces Asians to break away from the POC coalition and side with ordinary whites in support of law and order, then it could be a transformational event. But otherwise, it’s an example of people getting what they voted for. Asians voted for the politicians who coddle black criminals and cut police funding. Building coalitions with blacks ensures the attacks continue and the criminals walk free.
Asians need to realize their interests are not shared by their fellow POC. The world they vote for is what the Bay Area looks like now. Rising crime, failing infrastructure, soaring living costs, and human shit everywhere. A nice white country would never allow those problems to fester.
If Asians want to ensure their grandparents aren’t beaten to death, they’re going to have to switch sides.
If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every weekend on DLive.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
61 comments
“It’s hard to say how they face any discrimination outside of classmates slanting their eyes and shouting “Ching-Chong!””
But Mr. Hampton, don’t you see? That’s literal genocide! Worse than 9/11! And plenty of justification to destroy white society wholesale!
Asians are a stinking population though. The Chinese students at the dorms and family housing on California campuses smell up the place, spit everywhere and the grandma’s allow the black eyed lavae pee in the communal garden drains.
Asians are different. Japanese and Koreans are quiet different than Chinese. So as Vietnamese are.
The Chinese are not only smelling, they are dangerous, and they. while living in America, Europa, Qazaqstan or Russia, always have the strong loyalty to Maoists government in Bejing. The late writer David Wise has very good explained it in his last book TIGER TRAP, about Chinese espionage and influence in the US.
how are those asians different they all hate white people some show it implictly other openly like the Chinese, Indonesians, Filipinos etc.
This comment is really unfair to Japanese people who largely keep to themselves and their own country. They are nothing like the Chinese in terms of civility and general behavior that is why their country is the safest in the world while comparatively, in China, you have to worry about the food and water you buy because it can be fake or polluted(in case of the water) by some merchant trying to make more money by cutting corners. Not to mention, the thievery and scamming that goes on. Also, they have dai gou in everyone’s countries that buy up western merchandise and sell it in China to make a fat profit. Japanese people don’t do this stuff and they are not immigrating to our countries in mass and buying up our land.
“This comment is really unfair to Japanese people who largely keep to themselves and their own country.”
Except when they’re bombing Pearl Harbor.
…or dropping Plague-infected bombs over Chinese cities via Unit 731.
And what about Chinese human experimentations in Eastern Türkestan?
After we put them under an oil embargo. The USA wanted war with Japan.
And the Soviet Union pushed Japanese and Americans to war against each other. The Soviet agents of influence in Japan (not only Sorge and Co.) and Soviet agents of influence in the US (Harry Dexter White and many others) has made big efforts to provoke war in the Pacific and to thwart any attempt at compromise between both states.
Considering, we firebombed Tokyo burning at least a million non combatants alive that attack was many times avenged over, but let’s keep bringing up the past and antagonizing groups who are neutral towards us. Even better let’s group them in with other groups who they dislike who also hate us. Good idea.
Also, Japanese people suffer the same guilt tripping bs from other groups that white people do. Both China and Korea constantly smear and guilt them whenever they have the opportunity. Not to mention, the constant push for globalization in their homeland and the push for economic migrants from Africa to settle in Japan.
Now – and not 80 years ago – the Japanese and the Koreans are doing nothing bad and wrong. But the Chinese oppress and kill Uygurs and Qazaqs in occupied Eastern Türkestan and Tibetans in occupied Tibet. The Chinese has no attention to civil rights of the people in occupied provinces (former independent states), then why should we think about the civil rights of the Chinese?
The only asians I’m not hostile towards collectively are of the jungle variety, they’re pretty similar to conservative Whites whereas the “advanced” asians are effectively low crime negroes. Can’t say I care in the slightest that they’re being toll collected by blacks and getting treated like trash by jews, for such an allegedly intelligent group of people they sure seem to struggle with the cause and effect of endlessly voting democrat and relaxing around blacks.
This article covers all the important bases, and does so very efficiently. Asians are not the friends of White America. Indeed, this is possibly the first article I’ve seen that implicitly expresses a long held contention of mine, one that has triggered many an argument with normiecon friends over the past 30 years; namely, that Asians are a greater threat to white interests than Hispanics.
I oppose all nonwhite immigration (if I were a European in a European nation, or if this were the US as late as 1980, I would oppose all immigration, period; as a white American in a multiracialized nation, however, I do support more white immigration). This should be the first principle not only of ethnonationalists (or “sociobiological realists”, as we could also be called), but of authentic conservatives. What is being conserved first and foremost, if not the genetic identity of your people?
But given that we Americans are seemingly stuck with endless immigration, which race or group is preferable? My picks, from worst to best (with brief reasons):
1. MUSLIM ARABS (and WEST ASIANS). These are the worst due to the aggressive nature of Islam, combined with the strength of hostile purpose and ethnic-gang unity Islam gives to its Arab or South Asian adherents, especially outside of Muslim majority countries. In America, Muslims are able to hide their ethnonationalist viciousness behind our 1st Amendment freedom of religion guarantees (Jews, too, are able to veil their ethnonationalist actions under 1st Am “strict scrutiny” protections). And, of course, the more Muslims we have, the greater the chances of future domestic terrorist incidents, including the worst of all horrors, WMD terrorism.
2. BLACKS. I probably don’t need to elaborate on this one, given our era of BLM supremacism as well as 60 years of black criminality cum guerrilla race war against whites, and the whole monstrous edifice of affirmative action.
3. ORIENTALS. Many conservatives of a certain type extol Asians, esp Northeast ones [Chinese, Japanese, Koreans] as the “model minority” – industrious, lawful, familially stable, intelligent, and low in welfare use. This view, while accurate, is dangerously naive in the conclusions often extrapolated from it. Asians are out to better themselves. They have no concern for whites. They also are far more corrupt than whites, and far less charitable or altruistic or civic-minded. Asians will work hard to improve themselves, because that might be their best option. But if other options present themselves, ones which break the spirit if not the letter of the law, they will pursue those, too. Asians will take advantage of every POC opportunity at the expense of white men that treasonous white liberals grant them, even as they will decry the rare instances (eg, affirmative action) when they might lose out to another favored POC group. IOWs, unlike whites, both of the right and left, Asians rarely act in accordance with true, dispassionate moral principle. They are also very leftwing as voters (very much like Jews).
The main threats Asians pose are not, of course, those of terrorism and street crime. They are first, that Asians are genuine competitors with whites, even on meritocratic grounds. As Hampton sagely notes, Asian successes often come at the expense of the best whites – those of us who have the potential to be real racial/social/political leaders. Asian successes benefit individual Asians, and the Asian community – not whites. Second, Asians, being smarter than all other nonwhite groups, can be dangerous “thought leaders” – strategists and propagandists – within the broader antiwhite POC coalition. In this again they resemble Jews as a group. Finally, Chinese, the largest of the Oriental groups here (and the group which comprises the bulk of Asian immigrants, both now and potentially), are an obvious national security threat given their ethnic link to America’s main geostrategic and economic competitor. The more Chinese we take in, the greater the long term ability of China to manipulate American society.
4. HINDUS. The general dangers emanating from Hindu immigrants are that they are not white; there is an endless potential supply of them; and their IQ is low, and culture somewhat dysfunctional, meaning that masses of them allowed into our country would likely enable them to recreate the same squalid conditions here as in the old country. The specific danger they pose arises from the strange nature of US immigration policy in combination with their modal leftist (and often Far Leftist) politics (many of the really radical activists involved with both the repulsive Bernie Sanders, and the BLM movement, have been Hindu immigrants). Basically, Hindus are the one immigrant group that really are composed of the cognitively elite of their society. There are over a billion Indians; 700-800 million are Hindus (or Jains, or Sikhs: I’m using “Hindu” racially, not religiously). Most of the smartest want to immigrate to the West. So although sub-continentals are much less intelligent than Orientals overall, we are getting, due to the vagaries of US immigration policy, many of the smartest Hindus as immigrants (who are then often used to displace older white workers in technical occupations). Combine high IQ with extreme leftist/Third Worldist commitments (even worse than among the more strictly mercantile Orientals), and you get a very dangerous group gaining prominence and power in the US – at whites’ expense, of course. I only place them beneath the Orientals in undesirability because India will not be as great a threat as China for a very long time, due to both raw wealth and power considerations, and because India does not exhibit the same quest for global domination as does modern China.
5. HISPANICS. I have concluded these are actually the best nonwhite immigrants. Hispanics commit more crime than whites or Asians, but much less than blacks. Hispanics have no connection to major sources of terrorism. No Hispanic country is or will be a geostrategic threat to the US. Hispanics have the right level of modal IQ to be good “essential blue collar workers” (which is partly why so many normiecons have been so weak on immigration generally, given that the bulk of it has been Hispanic), but it is not high enough for them to pose a great internal cognitive threat to white interests.
Less objectively, but more interestingly, Hispanics exist on a racial continuum, and many see themselves as white (even when obviously somewhat mixed), or otherwise admire whites and want to be seen more as white than as some type of “colored”. Moreover, many Hispanics really are Christians, and tend not to be as automatically antagonistic to Western civ as others. I think white conservatives will over time be able to make greater inroads with Hispanics than with other nonwhite groups (possibly excepting Native Americans).
None of the above is to underestimate the dangers or general undesirability of Hispanic immigration. They commit more crime than whites. They use more welfare, and contribute less taxes. Their large scale presence also enables the terrifying Latino drug cartels to operate within the US with much greater ease. And the proximity to Mexico is worrying due to the continued pull of El Norte on the imaginations of vast hordes of potential border crossers.
All of this would be solved by a nice all-white Ethnostate, which must be our own (non-futile) Holy Grail. The above comparisons are just food for thought.
That’s a fair and well-thought analysis, meaning it would instantly get you labeled a “racist” and “white supremacist”.
Not a bad ranking, though I would rate blacks/Africans as worse than Muslims.
I live in a mostly Hindu suburb in northern Virginia. They don’t commit much crime and they keep their politics to themselves mostly. I had wanted my kids to have a childhood like mine, where their friends lived next door and in the same neighborhood. While none of the Indian kids are really hostile to my kids, they are not great friends either. They are clannish and mostly stick together. I would gladly take them over blacks though and maybe their presence will discourage the government from moving blacks to our neighborhood.
This was pretty good. I have a somewhat different ranking, which I may write up when I have access to a keyboard. This topic would be good for an essay, or even a short book, for counter currents.
Quite honestly, while the hispanic homicide rate in America is much lower than the blacks, they are by far the most terrifying criminals. Your assertion that say, Mexico, is not a geo-strategic threat to America I find astounding. You say that largely Americanized Chinese, of which there may be as few as six million, are a potential fifth column, but 40 million Mexican Americans with a geographic and linguistic continuity with their mother country aren’t? A country that funnels most of the narcotics that cause 100,000 overdose deaths last year? And has largely replaced our own agricultural and construction workforces in large parts of the country? And has drug cartels so bloodthirsty in their training and tactics they make ISIS look like a bunch of wilting daisies, who have shot down helicopters, who might have 50 billion in revenue each year? A culture so unbelievably shot through with corruption and ultraviolence that the defense minister turned out to be the leader of a cartel and people get decapitated in disputes over avocados. The 40,000+ homicides each year (but no-one really knows) certainly constitutes a more deadly war than the one currently raging in Afghanistan or Yemen, and in my lifetime I find it quite likely we will have a massive failed state to our southern border as the Mexican government can no longer provide even a semblance of order. Mexicans would have to be close to the bottom for me. They don’t read very much as a people. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/26/who-doesnt-read-books-in-america/
For Central Americans the problem is even worse. Replace the cartels with street gangs and even shorter statures.
Blacks don’t scare me in the abstract. If the US has 120 million Hispanics in the next 30 years, I may leave the country non-ironically and move to Newfoundland or Northern Ireland.
As for “hispanics/Mexicans don’t read,” there are Mexican and Spanish American publishers, supported by a Mexican and Spanish American readership. Not as robust as in the Anglosphere, but they’re there. Both the publishers and readers are white–you know, Spaniards, Argentinians, Colombians, etc., not “hispanics.” Instead of saying “hispanics don’t read” or “Mexicans don’t read,” say “mestizos and indios don’t read.” “Hispanic” is an anti-white term popularized by the US Census Bureau’s decision in the 1990 census, I believe, to create a new classification, Hispanic, who, unlike the other Census classes, can “be of any race.” It was designed to split off white Latin Americans and Spaniards from the rest of the white population in the US, by giving them a ludicrous “victim of racism” cachet to share with mestizos and indios. Please, everyone, stop using “hispanic” and use racial, ethnic, or national terms to describe peoples from Spain and Spanish America. It’s more intelligent and specific.
You’re correct that I probably should have used the term “mestizos” instead of “Hispanics”. However, “Hispanics” is the term in widest currency, and in the context of immigration, I did want to point out that at least some Hispanics are in fact white (I have two friends who fit this description; one is a white nationalist, “Catalonian division”). Moreover, many Hispanics are more genetically white than Indian, and really do behave more or less as whites, and prefer to see themselves as “white”. Many analyses of the 2020 election have come to the conclusion, correct imo, that vast numbers of Hispanics are more akin to working class white conservatives in modal outlook than to blacks (or white liberals). The raw numbers tell the same story. Democrats win the majority of every single group except white, Christian (or ancestrally Christian) heterosexuals. But the GOP won more Hispanics than voters from any other nonwhite group (except possibly Amerindians). Orientals, OTOH, are more akin to urban, (modally liberal) Jews in ideology, even if they are more law-abiding than Hispanic-mestizos (eg, Orientals are ferocious gun banners). I have observed this first hand for many decades.
Based on my personal observations, highly unscientific, Colombians read a lot.
Smartest Latino I ever knew was a mystery meat from Colombia. He made an Enigma Code replica for fun.
I don’t disagree with your observations. I did write in my comment:
“None of the above is to underestimate the dangers or general undesirability of Hispanic immigration. They commit more crime than whites. They use more welfare, and contribute less taxes. Their large scale presence also enables the terrifying Latino drug cartels to operate within the US with much greater ease. And the proximity to Mexico is worrying due to the continued pull of El Norte on the imaginations of vast hordes of potential border crossers.”
I oppose Latino immigration, along with all non-European immigration. No non-white immigration is actually good for white Americans. We’re being forced to share OUR country with those who are, at rare best, unlike us and unassimilable to us, and who are more usually threatening to us in myriad ways.
But I think one needs to look at the totality of Hispanic America in relation to white America. Many are truly white. Many are mixed, but wish to be thought of as white. They do not possess the same racial and/or religious hostility to white America that blacks and Muslims do. They have not so far been either a major terrorist threat, or prone to massive outbreaks of mob violence. They are, OTOH, not infiltrating power positions across society to the extent of Jews, and Orientals (and increasingly, Hindus, too). Mexico is a future demographic-social-civic threat to the US, but not a military one. Chinese espionage is a very real and huge threat; Mexican espionage probably does not exist. I see Latinos as the most truly assimilable of all the nonwhite groups; indeed, I would go so far as to say that I think many Latinos really can assimilate to white American norms and values, whereas Asians (like many Jews) often only due so externally, but not psychologically.
Again, I’m not pro-immigration (except for whites). I’m just offering up some thoughts about relative levels of racial threat and undesirability from a white-centric perspective.
That was an interesting list and you’re good at writing, but, like the article, you missed the biggest threat to American whites, which is jews – about 80% of them vote left, they usually pass as white despite having about 60% Middle Eastern ancestry, and diaspora jewish IQ is comparable to east asians.
Here’s an article by Ron Unz (a jew), with rough figures showing that in the Ivy League it is jews who mostly take the places which, on merit, should go to whites: https://www.unz.com/runz/the-myth-of-american-meritocracy/.
Thank you. I thought about Jews, and did make several implicitly unfavorable references (from a Eurocentric perspective) to them throughout my comment. I’m also, I admit, somewhat more “liberal” on the JQ than many other white preservationists, recognizing that Jews, unlike other non-Europeans, really do make many positive contributions to white America. This does not mean that I’m ignorant of Jewish antiwhite perfidy in US history, nor that I would have supported Jewish immigration here in the past, or that I would support more of it in the future.
But my comment was really c0ncerned with immigration, not racial threats to whites per se (I therefore did not racially analyze Amerindians, as they aren’t immigrants, past or future) and to my knowledge Jews do not make up a substantial component of present US immigration, nor are they a large potential source of future immigration.
I have replied to your comment about atheism and anti-natalism on the Singles Epidemic thread.
Just looked at that second monster comment of yours on the “Singles” thread. I need to reread it later this evening, and think how to respond. I agree with the other commenter that you really ought to write up your views in a post here. You’re thinking at a high level of precision and abstraction, and obviously you enjoy writing (as well as responding as fully as needed to the thoughts of others). I’m sure Dr. Johnson would publish a piece by you, and, equally, that it would generate a lot of commentary. Moreover, I think it would force the white preservationist community here to take our minds off our “bodily needs” (ie, the realm of fast-deteriorating quotidian politics), and focus for a spell on ultimate matters – why exactly we care so passionately about white preservation.
One thing that annoys me is that there are apparently some rules regarding the format in which you must submit a written work. In any case, you know that the bleakness of the subject matter, not to mention the charge of hypocrisy I lay upon ethno-nationalism, will make everyone here very angry with me. I am not in the best of health and I don’t know that I could withstand the onslaught of vindictive ad hominem attacks that are sure to be unleashed.
Again you’ve made a lot of very good points in a clear and well-written way; I agreed with everything you said, actually! I concede that your initial comment was primarily about immigration (afterwards I regretted the lack of nuance in what I said, and I thought I could have addressed what you said more accurately).
It was a pleasure to talk with you, thank you for your informed, balanced and erudite contributions. Cheers!
This is a great essay which quickly identifies and outlines our five greatest enemies worldwide. I do definitely believe China created that virus, whatever it is called — Covid-19 is the most ‘acceptable’ by our leftist compadres — and is using it to blatantly cause us vast amounts of economic and mental distress, without harming our infrastructure. It is therefore, the best and most undetectable ‘bomb’ ever used on a society. Sure, it’s taking out some millions worldwide, but it is aimed specifically at North America and Europe — and we have the highest death rates so far. ‘Nuff said about that.
The other races disliking us is easily explained by white leftists, of all people, stirring them up, and preaching revolutionary Marxism and such theories to them. Also, by the millions of Chinese communists which rarely ‘act badly’, with the obvious horrors of the 1948 takeover over of China, and ensuing starvation and concentration camps, etc., which most Americans never heard about.
But, the older I get and the more I hear our young people today, going on and on about ‘the sins of capitalism’, and about how their ‘parents’ generation’ treated the ‘poor minorities’, etc., I am beginning to think that these are the core of the hatred being spewed by the Left in this country. I seriously think that our youth are still rebelling against ‘mommy and daddy’ telling them to sit up straight, study their lessons and turn out the lights when they leave the room. Oh, and to attend Church on Sunday. It’ Rebellion against Authority in every instance. which we saw being played out this past summer. The White youth, who are supporting BLM and anarchists like Antifa, are using the POC minorities as a battering ram which exposes all the things that these children see as wrong. And the POC’s fuel them with their never-ending sob stores about how other ‘White People Abused Us’. It’s White people causing the trouble with other Whites — those of us especially who are older and have worked all our lives and have a bit of money stashed — not millions, but a stable pension and savings in the bank. Young Whites are rebelling about having to work 40 to 50 years in order to be financially stable in old age. I am convinced this is the crux of the problem. I have a Leftist roommate, 75, and all he does is whine about how his parents wouldn’t let him do ‘this and that’. He’s still whining about mummy and daddy, and seeing Trump and his followers as being his ‘oppressors’. And Leftists like him, see POC’s as oppressed people as well. And that is where the bond is formed.
I don’t know what to do about this mess, but I think it is just one more problem for us — coming from OUR OWN PEOPLE! Enemy #6.
For most of the year it was killing darkies and thinning out our aged useless population. Its ended tourism and stopped a lot of the work that is dominated by darkies like minicabs and restaurants. We must not lose this chance we got here in Europe. The incentive for these scum to live among us is dwindling fast.
I’m not so sure about the Chinese oirgins of Covid-19. After a lot of contemplation and reading, I’m inclined to believe that this mystery contagion which has dovetailed seamlessly with the largest wealth transfer in history originated stateside much like the anthrax business after 9/11 (Ft. Detrick, Md.). If this is the case ( heck, even if it isn’t), our neo-con and neoliberal national parasites pose a bigger threat to white interests or the interests of the overwhelming majority of struggling Americans regardless of background than all of the other five categories combined.
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/ap-and-atlantic-council-anoint-me-covid-conspiracy-super-spreader-and-erase-ron-unz/
I would put Jews at the top of that list.
I don’t call it the gook flu or anything like that.
I call it what it is: Regime Change in America.
“Asian Americans Advancing Justice president John C. Yang says it’s now time for his people to link arms with blacks to find the root causes of the attacks, opposing increased policing because it will harm blacks…”
Mr. Yang needs to get his head screwed on straight. What more is there to explain other than that under-parented youths with low IQ, low impulse control, and a pop culture glorifying violence aren’t the most pleasant people? That said, I do hope the Asians generally will figure out which side their bread is buttered on and quit Team Cultural Marxism.
“pretty much all of the assailants”? Who was the exception? Asians better hope mestizos don’t target them. They would attack them in a more organized and effective way than those idiotic blacks.
You know your nicotine addiction has got the best of you when your store and even your life matter less. Not even that photogenic, he should have had it dangling from his mouth like Robert Johnson or Eddie Van Halen while he held on to the rifle with both hands.
I saw an exception that appeared in a VICE article maybe a few days ago, which of course was the only article I’ve seen on the subject that featured a picture. The man looked white, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was some sort of plant to change the narrative, as it was just bizarre how he carried out the attack. Calculated. Other than that, all other attacks are by blacks on asians.
If an old huWhite person gets sucker punched by a negro that’s called being ‘polar beared’. So is a similar attack on an old chink called being ‘panda beared’? Is this what they call intersectionality? All I can think of is Carl Douglas…….”Evrabodee wuz kung foo fighting…..those kids were fast as lighting….in muh funky Chinatown.’
Regarding affirmative action, the short term answer is simple. Just give blacks the white spots in schools, jobs and other institutions that Asians are dominating. Everybody is happy except whites, who don’t matter and don’t defend themselves anyway.
Of course, pretty soon they will run out of whites and blacks will still want “their” spots. So, it is just kicking the can down the road for Asians. But maybe after whites are out of most positions of influence, politics will revert to simply racial politics and Asians will be free to run their (or what will become their) institutions without much interference or even with protection from Asian politicians/leaders.
Our #1 topic has got to b how to stop our numerical decline, we r being destroyed & we need to stop it. We cannot wait for the eleventh hour before we act fore it’ll b too late (our enemies r well aware of that, they’re not stupid, evil yes, but not stupid). We’re the stupid ones going along w/our genocide.
I am surprised and disappointed by the 30 percent figure (of Asians voting for Trump). Asian small-business people know exactly who robs and vandalizes and shoplifts and loots their stores. How could they not know? It’s a daily lived experience for them.
On the other hand, Asian-Americans are very tribal and have no visceral concern for the West’s plight. They will say (or not say) and do whatever is needed to survive.
I worked with a young Korean fellow some years ago, a South Korean army veteran. In hushed tones and very broken English, he opined to me that he did not think blacks were very intelligent. To which I diplomatically shrugged my shoulders.
So Asians know what’s up. But they also know not to reveal their awareness. They are not going to say or do anything that gets in the way of their economic or academic success.
And they also know that if worse comes to worst, there is an Asia they can emigrate to.
Having lived in the Bay, I have little to no sympathy for Asians. They’re passive conformists that enable every crazy Progressive idea imaginable. Oh they’re being targeted by Blacks you say? Then go back to China and the Philippines. They’re not “allies” and generally despise white people. They’re getting a taste of their own virtue signaling, BLM insanity.
The Asians, at least in public, will blame whites, “white racism”, and “white supremacy”. They’ll join forces with the blacks who are attacking them to turn whites into a despised minority in the country that their ancestors built. When whites have been crushed, the Asians and other anti-white elements of the population will kick the ignorant blacks to the kerb. The blacks will wind up wishing that whites were back in charge.
Should we call them “Asians,” or “orientals?” I remember a few years back, a commentator demurring against the term “orientals” (or was it “Asians”)? Do we have a commentator out there, who is erudite as to the correct descriptive, and why we should use one descriptive over the other, and why–inquiring minds want to know?
I may not be erudite about racial descriptors but I have developed my own theory about naming. The basic principle is that whatever the Sacred Victim Group was called by traditional White society must be changed.
It is not the aptness of the term but the identity of the namer which is the fulcrum. Had we Leukophores called them Asians in the past, we’d now we lectured about how racist that was and how we must now call them Orientals.
The entire PC lingo renovation is a form of White/Male humiliation. That’s it’s only real organizing principle.
Re: “That’s it’s only real organizing principle.”
It’s its, not it’s.
(Old school teacher here. Mea culpa. And altar boy.)
Asians are our biggest threat. They vote Democrat not because they believe in that stuff. They do so because they know the left liberal mindset will ultimately destroy their biggest competition which is us, Whites. Democrats will keep the borders open and allow further Asian immigration. They know that once Whites pass away, they will be more than able to handle Blacks and Muslims in a post-White Euro/American society. They just need to wait. And they wait patiently and help us along in our stupidity.
I am based in the UK. Boris the clown has just invited up to 5 million ethnic HK Chinese into the UK. Frightening insanity. Nobody can say anything. Racist and all that. Time to fight.
The addition of five million Hong Kongers into the British Isles may not cause them to capsize, a la Guam, and tip into the ocean, but with the continual destruction of farmland the population will become so light the wind might blow them away!
If you are a Chinese do you want to leave China? They are close to global hegemony. Why give that up for London or Birmingham?
Johnson is just trolling Beijing.
Because despite the new narrative that China is now wealthy and HK even wealthier, the place is still a sh*thole to live in. Even if you have a decent “middle class” income you will still live in a high rise chicken farm apartment 500 sq ft, crushed in by 1.4 billion of your compatriots.
So they will come and fill our spaces until our living standards in the West and East converge aided and abetted by our traitorous elite.
US, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are probably their favourite places with the larger houses and reduced population density but even the UK with its higher density still compares very favourably to living on the 40th floor of some cramped tower block in Shenzen.
Exactly, they overpopulated and despite what the Beijing government insists the infrastructure still isn’t there so people cram around the larger cities in tiny apartments. Chinese love to invade and buy up property in other people’s countries for the open space and they have the gall to complain about colonialism in the past.
Deport them all!!!!!!
I agree that Asians are less disgusting than Blacks, less violent, more intelligent, etc. Even so, I don’t want to be ruled by them. Never forget they have the same seething hatred for White people shared by all non-whites. Also, they have their own countries where they should be residing, NOT HERE.
The Asians are pro-Left anti-White and will not change sides. They hate us too much and are too afraid of being called racist.
Whites can only rely on ourselves for survival, not on the good intentions of people who hate us.
You forgot a group. White people that refuse to acknowledge or appreciate their own race and genetic inheritance – and celebrate the destruction and degradation of their race in order to be liked, or be cool, and because they are too stupid to respect their ancestors or their native cultures and/or too cowardly to stand up for themselves. They will be eaten alive one day – let’s just hope they don’t take the rest of us down with them.
If I have understood correctly, the effluvium of Whiteness somehow causes African-Americans to assault Asian-Americans, but not the reverse.
Perhaps this is because nineteenth century colonialist narratives portray Africans as bestial and Orientals as passive, and as we know the pernicious influence of such stereotypes persists to this day.
Wouldn’t the world automatically become a better place if the taint of Whiteness could be erased! The only question is how this should be accomplished …
In this case I am more sympathetic to the blacks, but as usual the expression of black discontent is crudely expressed. They see these recently arrived Asians come in and vault over them in the hierarchy and become a threat in terms of cutting into their share of the spoils system. Asians, as a group, have the least claim to be here, and most of them already have family still living in Asia- a prosperous part of the world. There’s really no good reason to have so many Asians around. Most of them should be encouraged to go home. After that happens, the blacks should be given formal divorce papers and we should be done with them entirely.
For what it is worth there is some unease among non-whites, never mind whites, in Britain over the impending influx of millions of Hong Kong Chinese, though Government and NGO preparations continue apace to welcome them. All around lockdowned London these banners are appearing “ Welcome to the UK ukhk.org “. Under lockdown restrictions protests and demonstrations against the impending deluge are of course forbidden.
Thanks for the link to ukhk.org. It confirms my worst fears. Tracing who is funding it is Welcome Churches.org a UK charity dedicated to welcoming refugees. Their tagline is “No refugee alone” Farcical when applied to people of HK. The “about us” page is full of smiling virtue signalling traitors in photos with the refugee of the day undermining their own race.
Of course I won’t find any concerns by whites on mainstream outlets but do you have links to the concerns by non-whites. I can’t find anything.
The Guardian had an article about how HKer will benefit the UK economy to the tune of £2.5 billion. T0 the economic illiterate clowns that is chump change against our GDP and not worth shifting the demographics of a nation for, Not that any price is either.
Comments defending Hispanics in America truly bothers me. Their culture is so very different, though you may get a handful of right-wing Hispanics you get many David Hoggs and angry Mestizos trying to be Black. And I really find them tough to look at. Like a Spaniard whom threw his genes away and created a monster.
Not to mention their crime rates would be much higher and White crime rates much lower if there were genetic tests done separating the two. The “Hispanic Effect” is just the tip of the iceberg.
I also think Japanese Americans are being unduly judged. They are quite brilliant as a people, much like other Asian groups, but yes more so than others. Still, I understand their voting patterns and that they too are walking on White peoples back for social gain. Much easier to respect and enjoy a people when you do not share the same home.
The Tower of Babel cannot stand.
And it’s easy to understand why all these immigrant groups vote Left – it helps their people and they and we know that the country truly belongs to Whites. Right-wing politics in many ways (Not Cuckservatives) is about the future of a nation and owning it and being responsible for it. It is ours, everyone knows it. Asians want the table scraps from the fat plump Blacks and Hispanics, we just want the table, we’ll bring our own food again.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.