Sand Seed in the Works

1,813 words

Pastor Dan Gayman
Ishmael and Islam vs. Isaac and Christianity
Schell City, Missouri: Watchman Outreach Ministries, 2002

There is nothing quite like the last few weeks of summer in North America. The stifling humidity of summer is gone, the leaves on the trees are a deep and happy shade of green, and the sky is often a severe-clear blue. There was no late summer quite like that of The Year of Our Lord, 2001. The weather was magnificent and the sky a brilliant azure blue.

Under a clear blue sky in the late afternoon the day before the terror attack, I was part of a group of bystanders that helped a victim of a traffic accident. I felt like I was a hero and among heroes, a solid member of an upstanding American community. I also felt that I understood the world and could quickly master all situations. The next day I watched the Twin Towers crumble, and everything got more difficult. Now, when late summer returns and the sound of crickets fills the air, the memories of that day and the troubles that followed flood into my mind.

In the immediate wake of the terrorist attack, the mainstream narrative’s response to 9-11 was dominated by the Jewish media and the spin in every news show, magazine, and newspaper leaned towards neo-conservativism – which was a Jewish ethnonationalist strategy mascarading as a philosophical call for law-and-order. As Ground Zero smouldered, the media hyped the works of a Jewish “expert” on the Middle East named Bernard Lewis (1916 – 2018).[1]

Lewis compared the situation in Egypt during the Napoleonic Wars to the circumstances of 2001 to imply that Europeans and Westerners could easily occupy Arab and Moslem lands and turn things around. Lewis, and his neo-conservative supporters in the Bush 43 regime, ignored the complex history of the region and the more recent changes, which included developments like Baathism and the acquisition of enormous stockpiles of arms and ammunition.

Now that 9-11 is more than two decades into the past, I thought it worthwhile to re-look at the words of a pro-white activist who was active at the time. The activist, Pastor Dan Gayman, is a Christian Identity minister. He published a book in 2002 which is a jeremiad calling America’s whites to walk the straight and narrow path and an exploration of the conflict between Islam and Christendom.

Ishmael and Islam vs. Isaac and Christianity has a sense of being hastily written in the immediate aftermath of the terror attack when the facts of the event were barely leaking out, so there is a first-draft feel to the book. Additionally, there are a number of errors. For example, Gayman says that the attacks came on a busy Monday morning – 9-11 was on a Tuesday. He also says that the nineteen hijackers consisted of fifteen Saudis (true) and four Egyptians (not true). He also claims that all Arabs are Moslems. This was widely believed in Middle America at the time, but it is not true, there are Christians, Yazidis, Druze, and Mandaeans among the Arabs.

Regardless of these errors, much of what Gayman says is correct. The 9-11 attacks were motivated by America’s support for the Zionist Entity in Palestine. This support is mostly due to Jewish pressure on American elected officials, plus the dubious theology of Dispensationalism, as well as the foolish idea of “Judeo-Christianity.” Jews have also thrown open the gates for immigrants which allowed the terrorists admittance in the first place. No sane country would allow Saudis entrance.

Gayman believes that the root of the conflict between Islam and Christendom goes back to the two sons of Abraham, Isaac and Ishmael. Ishamel is the mythical father of all the Arabs. In the Bible, Hagar, Ishmael’s mother is visited by an angel:

And the angel of the Lord said unto her, Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the Lord hath heard thy affliction. And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren. (Genesis 16:11-12 KJV)

God also promised to bless Abraham through his two sons saying:

That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice. (Genesis 22:17-18 KJV)

Therefore, the Sons of Isaac, which in Christian Identity theology are the Anglo-Saxons and related peoples, are the star seed and the Moslems, especially the Arabs, are the sand seed. The Anglo-Saxons are slowly spreading into space while the Islamic world sinks into the dry sand of darkness and decay punctuated by temporary moments of fanatical, violent brilliance.

Charles Martel in the Battle of Tours, 1837. Charles de Steuben

Pastor Gayman points out that Islamic pirates have been involved in slavery and attacks on Europe from its start. Islam has also spread by the sword, while Christianity has spread by peaceful persuasion. He is especially appreciative of the Franks, who are related to the Anglo-Saxons, who turned back a Moorish Islamic Army in 732.

The Franks, who came to rule Gaul after the collapse of Roman power in the West are closely related to the Anglo-Saxons. The French don’t consider themselves Anglo-Saxons, of course.

Pastor Gayman predicted further acts of terror because the Zionist Entity in Palestine remains supported by the US government and immigration has not been controlled. He also expressed frustration that the well-funded intelligence and law enforcement services failed to predict or prevent the attack. He correctly attributes this to the federal government’s wrongheaded focus on Anglo-European white advocates rather than actual foreign threats.

The book doesn’t have a solid read on the splits within Islam – nobody in American society in 2002 had a solid read on the Ghost Dancer movements of Mohommet. The most dangerous denominations of Islam are the following:

Wahhabism: A puritanical revivalist movement that arose in Arabia during the eighteenth century. It started out by criticizing the sacralization of tombs, the veneration of Islamic saints, and astrology. They aligned with the Saud family in 1774, and in recent decades Wahabis have sought to impose their worldview on Islam with violence backed by petrodollars.

Salafism: A movement which seeks to emulate the example of the first Muslim adherents. By the early twentieth century, it was increasingly radical. Its greatest proponent was Sayyid Qutb, who wrote the book In the Shade of the Qur’an. This movement was the ideological inspiration for the 9/11 terrorists and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Deobandism: Originated in South Asia as a response to what was believed to be the corrupting influence of British colonialism. They also sought to merge modern, Western technology with Islamic ideas. They encourage active participation in politics and a literal interpretation of the Qur’an. This ideology was adopted by Afghanistan’s Taliban after being spread there by the Deobandists when they instructed Afghan refugees in Pakistan.

Negro Worship and Two Decades of Failure

Two decades of war in Afghanistan started with people falling to their deaths from the World Trade Center on a bright, blue-skied day. The war in Afghanistan ended on a bright, blue-skied day with Afghan “allies” falling to their deaths while attempting to ride on the outside of a cargo plane. The war in Afghanistan started and ended with the Taliban in control.

During the twenty years in Afghanistan, the American government had spent piles of money and spilled a great deal of blood to turn Kabul into a functional society. None of that worked. Furthermore, the US Department of Defense was lying about progress the entire time.

The Afghan War ended in the same way that every war America’s been involved in since the armed forces desegregated in 1948 – with frustrating failure. The wars that came out of 9-11 are unique in that no great, inspiring generals emerged at any time during the fighting. Those that became household names, Stan McChrystal, David Petraeus, etc. are better known for the scandals stemming from their poor judgement than success on the battlefield.

There are many problems, but the most important one is the culture of casual lying in the military. The main cause of this lying is Negro Worship – the semi-Christian heresy of believing sub-Saharans are some sort of oppressed group of geniuses. On any day in any rifle company, or other type of unit in any branch of the service, there are problems with sub-Saharans especially involving crime and the issues of an IQ a standard deviation below that of whites. That issue is the central problem that has no name and no plan for resolution.

There really are senior military leaders who think they are suppressing “the Klan” or “white supremacists” while the sub-Saharan troops are gang-raping the female soldiers in the barracks. This isn’t hyperbole. Those who rise to the top in the desegregated military are men who misread data or are selected because they claim to misread the racial situation. They are liars, fools, and collaborators for an anti-white army working for a foreign occupation government.

A perfect example of Negro Worship in the military during the wars following 9-11 was the fact that the sub-Saharan Secretary of Defense wasn’t fired nor was he asked to resign after the disastrous retreat from Kabul. He benefited from both the soft bigotry of low expectations and Negro Worship. The results are catastrophic. The retreat from Afghanistan created a failure to deter and a war in Ukraine followed.

Nothing has changed. Recently a scandal the Pentagon has attempted to keep under wraps since March of 2024 is emerging. A sub-Saharan four-star army general is seeking to get his job back after being suspended for misconduct. He had attempted to improperly influence a command selection board to select an unfit officer for a major command. He is a sub-Saharan and his favored officer is sub-Saharan. The military is now like that of the forces in a banana republic, where promotions depend on identity and loyalty rather than ability. Osama bin Laden, 9-11’s mastermind, wouldn’t have been surprised by any of this.

Notes

[1] Bernard Lewis was mentioned by Wilmot Robertson in The Dispossessed Majority. He wrote:

The publishing and entertainment industries feed on ideas as well as events, and in the realm of ideas American Jews are just as firmly embedded as elsewhere. Below is a sampling of Jews who in the later half of the century have figured prominently in the social sciences.

PHILOSOPHERS: Mortimer Adler, Hannah Arendt, Morris Cohen, Irwin Edman, Sidney Hook, Abraham Kaplan, Herbert Marcuse, Robert Nozick, Murry Rothbard, Paul Weiss.

HISTORIANS: Daniel Boorstin, Herbert Feis, Peter Gay, Eric Goldman, Oscar Handlin, Gerturde Himmelfarb, Richard Hofstadter, Bernard Lewis, Richard Morris, Gerald Nash, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Barbara Tuchman