Senile Joe’s Kabul SkedaddleMorris van de Camp
Before you read this article, you need to drop everything and contact your elected official encouraging him or her to not allow any Afghan refugees into your country. While Afghans are white Indo-Europeans, their culture has some drawbacks. Those “translators” we are supposedly obligated to help were often involved in insider attacks, theft, and bacha bazi. It’s better to resettle them in the other “Stans” or in the United Arab Emirates.
The Fall of Kabul has caused me to reflect back upon 9/11 and the Great War of Terror Americans have been involved in for so many years. I’ve come to believe the following: The American intervention in Afghanistan after September 11, 2001 was just, and the withdrawal from Afghanistan was likewise a good move in the long run. The exact circumstances of the withdrawal were a disaster, though, equivalent to a defeat in battle. That disaster matters and needs to be discussed.
9/11: Just Before & Just After
I was in the US Army when the 9/11 terror attacks took place. I was assigned to a training course for company grade officers. What I recall of that week was the wonderful weather. The sky was azure blue and the temperatures were in the 70s. Before the attack the news had been slow, too; the media was focused on a Congressman whose intern and mistress had vanished (she had been murdered by an illegal immigrant), as well as some unusual shark attacks.
Then came 9/11. It was surreal to be on active duty during that time. We all knew we’d be off to war very soon, and soldiers temporarily became a very low level type of celebrity. In the weeks after the attack, if a soldier went away from the post — to one of the Anywhere towns with a college and seminary to get dinner at a chain restaurant, for example — the cute young waitress would flirt with us to no end. It was fun, in a way.
The National Guard was called up to secure airports. These soldiers would walk around without a magazine in their rifles; this came to be called “security theater.” Meanwhile, shirts and hats that spelled out NYPD or FDNY became high fashion. The country rallied round the flag, and President Bush gave a Texas tough-guy speech at Ground Zero in New York. The azure blue skies had no contrails, either, as flights were grounded for days.
In my little world of company grade military officers, the works of the late Stephen E. Ambrose were incredibly popular at that time. By the mid-1990s, Ambrose had moved to the top of the popular history scene. His books about the Second World War are entertaining and well-written, but portray the Americans of the GI Generation as something like perfect, plastic demi-gods. Ambrose also served as an advisor on the 1998 movie Saving Private Ryan. In 2001, HBO produced a highly-rated mini-series based on one of Ambrose’s books called Band of Brothers.
I’ve come to believe that the popularity of Stephen Ambrose’s books and TV shows like Band of Brothers were not particularly helpful for those of us who were about to be deployed. It caused too many Americans to view events through a simplistic lens, one where the Americans wore white hats, everyone else wore black hats, and there was an expectation that everything would turn out all right in the end.
In reality, the situation was completely different from the Second World War. The terror attacks were the result of a number of factors, including American support for Israel, American and Gulf Arab support for men who followed a dangerous interpretation of Islam when they were engaged in war against the Soviet Union, and an idiotic immigration policy bringing in people from an utterly alien culture who were incapable of embracing America’s ever-changing values. It was not possible for everything to turn out all right in the end this time around.
The first spectacular Muslim attack on American soil after the Cold War in fact happened on February 26, 1993. Two days later, what one would now call the Deep State besieged heartland Americans in Waco, Texas. While Islamic attacks increased and developed a pattern that became universally known, agencies like the FBI rather saw ordinary white Americans as a threat. A Muslim travel ban should have been enacted in 1993, but it wasn’t — and decades of war followed.
The Afghan War was a Just War
It was only a matter of time before Taliban-ruled Afghanistan was invaded by somebody. In the late 1990s, they were a less media-savvy version of ISIS’ later insanity. In 1998, Taliban fighters murdered Iranian diplomats – merely for reasons of blood lust, as far as I can tell. In late 1999, Taliban terrorists hijacked an Indian aircraft as part of a terror campaign to coincide with the arrival of the year 2000. The hijackers were al-Qaeda sympathizers. In 2001, the Taliban blew up ancient statues of the Buddha in central Afghanistan. All the while, they were harboring al-Qaeda. After an attack like 9/11, America had every justification to invade Afghanistan. (Indeed, the Iranians would have been justified in attacking Afghanistan in 1998.)
Moreover, had the Taliban turned Osama bin Laden over to the United States following 9/11 as the US demanded, they wouldn’t have suffered an American occupation for two decades. The war could have been completely avoided.
As American troops first deployed to Afghanistan in October 2001, there was frank discussion about Afghanistan in the print media. There were a number of magazine articles about the disastrous British deployment to Kabul in 1842, for example.
The Withdrawal from Afghanistan is Good in the Long Run
The failure to capture Osama bin Laden at Tora Bora in November 2001 was a disaster. It allowed Jewish neoconservatives in the government and media to goad an angry American population into going to war with Iraq, despite the fact that Iraq had not been involved in the attack in any way. It also helped justify the long-term American occupation of Afghanistan. And when Osama bin Laden was killed in 2011, careful preparations to leave Afghanistan should have begun — something along the lines of the American withdrawal from the Panama Canal Zone.
We had many reasons to leave after bin Laden’s killing:
- The Afghan government was illegitimate, corrupt, and ineffective.
- Afghanistan has a dangerous population. This population can be easily exploited by nations and groups hostile to the United States and NATO to create insurgencies to tie down military resources needed elsewhere.
- Afghanistan is a factor in America’s low-level (so far) civil war. The Deep State and anti-Trump media lied about President Trump tolerating “the Russians” paying bounties to kill Americans — but this lie can go the other way, too. Imagine if a right-leaning news outlet were to accuse a sub-Saharan US Defense Department official of tolerating “Russian” bounties for Afghans to kill white Americans? You think January 6 was bad? And these accusations don’t need to be true!
- No government that gets involved in Afghanistan in the future will fare well, either. If the Chinese go in, they too will face all the same problems the US had.
Even though the withdrawal was long overdue, Kabul’s fall to the Taliban is an epic disaster. There are two parties responsible for it that need to be discussed: the Biden administration and the US Department of Defense.
A Biden Cognitive Nosedive?
Presidencies are unpredictable. Bill Clinton was headed towards irrelevancy before Timothy McVeigh blew up a building. Clinton’s handling of that catastrophe helped him get re-elected. Politics is a strange, long game: Anything can happen — and suddenly. Biden, for his part, has the support of powerful figures in the United States; they rigged an election for him. The media still covers for him, but the Fall of Kabul has the feel of a mortal blow to the Biden administration, like the blow that Hurricane Katrina was to George W. Bush.
It might be the case that the Biden administration began its nosedive on election night. The vote was so obviously rigged that a quarter of a million Americans went to Washington, DC to protest its certification. This was a watershed moment in American politics, when whites no longer believed the media or the Establishment. And things haven’t gotten better since. Biden’s first executive orders were ill-conceived, and they immediately caused an ongoing border crisis. Then the Colonial Pipeline cyber-attack was poorly handled by Biden – and now we have inflation.
Biden’s cognitive decline, which was obvious during the campaign but denied by the mainstream media, is now undeniable. Biden’s routinely incoherent answers to questions attest to this. On July 8, 2021, when asked if there was a chance the US withdrawal from Afghanistan would end up being similar to the embarrassing end of the Vietnam War, Biden responded:
None whatsoever. Zero. . . . The Taliban is not the South — the North Vietnamese army. They’re not — they’re not remotely comparable in terms of capability. There’s going to be no circumstance where you see people being airlifted off an embassy the — of the United States from Afghanistan.
In a recent interview with George Stephanopoulos, Biden likewise bumbled:
Look, that’s like askin’ my deceased son Beau, who spent six months in Kosovo and a year in Iraq as a Navy Captain and then Major — I mean, as an Army Major. And, you know, I’m sure h– he had regrets comin’ out of Afganista– I mean, out of Iraq.
Biden has been on vacation throughout the Afghanistan crisis. He might be “on vacation” because he can’t cogently discuss what’s going on.
The Department of Defense
Ultimately, the logistics of the Afghan withdrawal were the responsibility of the US Department of Defense. American withdrawals don’t have to automatically end in disaster. The US left the Panama Canal Zone in 1999, and Panama didn’t collapse into anarchy. What has changed is that the US military is today producing less capable senior officers, and there is also the African Question.
For all of his many faults, I cannot imagine that the late Donald Rumsfeld would have screwed up the withdrawal if he had had enough time to plan for it. Also, having a retired general as Secretary of Defense is a terrible idea. They’re too limited, too used to being obeyed, and are inexperienced in local politics. The military can cover up a crime committed by a sub-Saharan on post or in the barracks with lies and omissions, but a local politician is forced to deal with it when African gang-bangers are threatening white schoolkids at a bus stop. That can’t be hushed up. The Secretary of Defense therefore needs to be a person who has such experience. The ideal candidate should have some military experience, also extensive experience in politics and industry.
But the overarching problem is the African Question. Sub-Saharans are the crack in the Pentagon’s foundation. The US military has too many sub-Saharans in its ranks, and those Africans are over-promoted. There’s no other way to put it. When you promote officers who believe in “civil rights,” you eventually get commanders who think they are fighting “the Klan” while sub-Saharan junior NCOs are carrying out “polar bear attacks” at the post exchange with impunity. Believe in “civil rights” and eventually you will believe anything, no matter how obviously wrong. Officers like General Mark Milley, talking about “white rage” while failing to adequately plan for a major troop withdrawal, are the natural outcome of believing in “civil rights.”
Besides this, the Fall of Kabul boils down to:
- An inaccurate understanding of the Afghan government: its will to fight, capabilities, and legitimacy.
- Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin is incompetent. Simply put, he is a sub-Saharan who was put into the job as a result of pressure from BLM and a belief in Critical Race Theory.
- In the months leading up to the Fall of Kabul, the Department of Defense carried out a demoralizing, anti-white “extremism stand-down.”
- General Mark Milley failed to protect American cities during a domestic Communist/sub-Saharan insurgency. He hid behind a dubious interpretation of the law and was insubordinate. Furthermore, it is possible Milley fears his black troops, but won’t utilize his white ones more fully out of his need to cater to the new order of the day.
- General Officers are selected today in part based on what they think about trendy Leftist flapdoodles such as transgender toilets, not due to genuine competence.
The best response to this crisis I’ve seen so far is from a blogger going by the name of CDR Salamander. (This is another problem: truth-tellers in our dystopian “civil rights” democracy must hide behind pseudonyms.) He argues that since the Afghan Army folded in a fortnight after twenty years of training and being equipped with trillions of dollars of equipment
[e]ven the most die-hard Biden partisan should be demanding the resignation of the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the National Security Advisor. In another age, they would have all resigned already — but we don’t live in that age.
All the Joint Chiefs of Staff need to resign as one. Either they own their collective failure because they offered this plan as a good one, or they don’t have the confidence of the President and their recommendations not to do this were ignored. Either are sufficient for resignation as honor demands.
They are imminently replaceable. We are bloated and thick with excessively credentialed General and Flag Officers who can take their place.
We might cut the unfortunate Biden some slack due to his dementia, but it is clear that the Democratic Party, the mainstream media, the organized Jewish community, federal law enforcement, and senior military leaders who so loyally support Senile Joe have developed a form of cruel, incompetent insanity. They don’t care if a senile president gets elected by fraud; if American towns are burned; if American monuments, statues, or museums are destroyed; if Afghans die while trying to escape their country; or if Afghan terrorists are settled in Provo.
And we are only eight months into Senile Joe’s regime.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
 After 9/11, the media hyped the Jewish historian Bernard Lewis (1916–2018), using his work to promote the idea that Islamic countries would be easy for the US to occupy.
The Fall of the House of Biden
We Need to Stop Taking Black Complaints Seriously
Three Episodes from the History of Racial Politics
Prioritizing Prestige Over Accomplishment: Britain from 1950 to 1956
Will Woke Capital Soon Go the Way of the Dinosaur?
Football’s Race War
Biden and Bibi
The Worst Week Yet: May 21-27, 2023
“While Afghans are white Indo-Europeans,”
Nope, except from a very small minority in places like Nuristan (formerly Kafiristan), most Afghans would stick out like a sore thumb in a homogenous European society.
I liked this article, as I do all of Morris’s stuff, but I’m surprised that he accepts the entire official 9/11 narrative. I’ve long stopped thinking it had anything to do with bin laden or Afghanistan. He rejects the official narrative on other things, like the stolen election.
Stay chill. What worries me as you point out is some damned veteran of Afghanistan, a fool like McVeigh comes along again but this time protests the withdrawal for abandoning females in Afghanistan. Hint Waco wasn’t the hill to die on, because 25% of the members were blacks and the rest were anti racist pentacostalists. The FBI and ATF had awkwardly massacred a multiracial cult. McVeigh neatly resurrected the reputation of the agencies involved. The women in Afghanistan are going to okay enough. They’ve been living with their men for millennia.
Good article & actually I did write my senator advising against bringing ANY Afghan refugees to the US. Why should we bring them? To encourage collaborators the next time our military decides to invade a small nation? I say let the military own up to their failures and leave the Afghans in Afghanistan.
It does bring to mind the thought that what if Sec of Defense Austin spent the 2 months planning the withdrawal from Afghanistan rather than ordering a complete stand-down of the US military to root out supposed white supremacists? Things might have gone better. Of course President Biden is saying the withdrawal went as well as possible and no mistakes were made. Thus if everything was optimal, no resignations are needed for our top military advisors.
Old white Joe send William Burns, Director of CIA to Kabul to negotiate with Abdul Ghani Barardar. I guess he offered him a billion dollars to extend the deadline. But Barardar said, “No, all foreigners have to be out of Afghanistan by the 31st…if they aren’t that will be crossing a red line.” (!!!)
I enjoyed the article, as well as the excellent one on Woodrow Wilson’s African army. I do think the author offers the official view about Afghanistan, which I completely disagree with, although historically the tribes in the land are always at war with each other; it will probably continue, because in this part of the world there is chaos until a strongman asserts power, and hence comes order. Much like Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
As for our leaving Afghanistan, I recall Harold Covington’s comment: “In colonial wars,
surrenders are made by the accountants, not the generals.”
The comments about the “sub-saharan” army are telling. I remember seeing black West Point cadets give the black power salute en masse.
I was in the U.S. army and national guard/reserves for fourteen years. The Guard was almost overwhelmingly white. In my artillery battalion, we had three firing batteries, a service and HQ battery. One of the firing batteries was in St. Louis, mostly black, and incompetent. At Annual training, we always had to fill the battery with whites so it could do its mission. It always bled troops, because blacks drop out of the guard at a high rate.
I agree with the reminiscences about 9/11. I recall the 1990-91 Gulf War. It was predicted there would be “thousands” of American casualties. Also, a lot of people cheered troops, and when my Guard unit was in a parade or doing training in front of our armory, people honked their horns, gave thumbs-up and shouted “Give ’em hell”, or F**k Iraq; kick the s**t outta ’em.” And this was in Boston.
I agree with the Stephen Ambrose hagiography about the Greatest Generation, but I like many of his other books. One early one of his is Crazy Horse and Custer: The Parallel Lives of Two Warriors. Very well-written and describes the personalities and worlds of these two warriors.
I would say that this government and nation is in a state of free-fall, and it’s almost intentional. Somehow I might offend some readers, but I would say satanic, for satan is the Lord of Misrule, and that’s what we have now.
The 911 attacks were conducted by Deep State, and the Mossad. I must respectfully disagree with everything you wrote.
And as evidence you offer up what? I certainly agree there were elements within federal government that wanted the ability to crack down on the citizenry using the dreaded patriot act, but I don’t believe they were so insane as to attack the twin towers and pentagon to attain it. Such colossal damage to the homeland seems too high for even the most cynical power addict. I have never been completely sold on bin laden either, but he was a prime suspect and had a willingness to go for it.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment