Election Rigging? Kanye West Wins “Anti-Semite of the Year” Award, but the Year Isn’t Even Over Yet
Hardworking anti-Semites worldwide are crying foul that black rapper Kanye West won the coveted “Anti-Semite of the Year” award from watchdog group StopAntisemitism on December 11. Without explanation, the award was issued 20 days before the year actually ended, prematurely thwarting all other anti-Semites’ valiant attempts to best Mr. West at the ancient art of Jew-hatred.
There are also grumblings that although West may have injected the JQ into the popular consciousness to a far greater degree than any possible competitor, he’s only been openly baiting Jews since about Halloween. The award is for the Anti-Semite of the year, and some feel this does a disservice to the legions of dedicated and hard-working Jew-haters who’ve been toiling in obscurity since the Sun rose last New Year’s Day. Don’t they get any trophies?
At least the Global Anti-Semite Community can breathe a collective sigh of relief over the fact that West was not awarded the coveted “Best Anti-Semite in World History” award. He’s performed admirably in the past few weeks, but he’s still not fit to carry the jockstraps of men such as Charles Lindbergh, Henry Ford, and Martin Luther. Come to think of it, Hitler was no slouch, either.
UN Tells Israel to “Renounce Possession of Nuclear Weapons”
The fact that Jews are not the most popular people on the planet is dangerous for Jews and non-Jews alike. Jews wind up feeling backed into a corner regardless of whether or not they’re actually being backed into a corner. This becomes far more problematic when one considers that not only is Israel the world’s only nuclear power that won’t admit it has nuclear weapons; it’s also the only country in the world to vote against a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East. It’s very bratty not for Israel to admit this, very uppity of them.
In a story that didn’t get nearly as much attention as it should have for reasons I can’t imagine, the United Nations General Assembly voted 149-6 last week commanding God’s Chosen Nation “not to develop, produce, test, or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons” and to “renounce possession of nuclear weapons.”
The six nations that opposed the order are Israel, the United States, Canada, Micronesia, Palau, and Liberia. Ukraine was absent from the vote but stood against Israel in a similar vote back in October.
The fact that Israel has nuclear weapons — while it cries out in pain about Iran possibly developing nuclear weapons — is one of the world’s dirtiest open secrets. Their strategy of total global annihilation lest anyone think of nuking Israel is known as the “Samson Option,” after the biblical Samson pulled down the pillars to kill the Philistines along with himself. The plan’s architects reasoned that taking the entire world with Israel was better than simply laying down and dying like the Jews did at Masada.
Israel had planned to detonate a nuclear bomb in the Sinai Desert during the Six-Day War just to scare the bejeezus out of the Muslim world. During 1973’s Yom Kippur War, Israel’s decidedly homely Prime Minister Golda Meir threatened to strap 13 nuclear bombs onto missiles and aircraft if the US didn’t airlift supplies to Israel. The US obeyed.
The UN is basically saying, “Jews, we know you have them, and now you have to get rid of them. Let’s be reasonable, Jews.” It’s a slap in the face to global Jewry, and if I know anything about Jews from personal experience, it’s that they don’t like being slapped in the face.
In a 2007 essay for the Los Angeles Timers called “Dark Thoughts and Quiet Desperation,” David Perlmutter wrote:
What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter. Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens? For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away — unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans — have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?
How about trying to get along with the rest of the world for a change?
Harvey Weinstein’s Rape Trial Hinges on his Savagely Deformed Scrotum and “Fish-Like” Penis
Although the lumpy clump of chopped liver known as Harvey Weinstein is currently serving 23 years on separate rape charges, he’s also on trial in Los Angeles on 11 counts of rape and assault on five women from 2003 to 2014. His allegedly repulsive genitals have been in super-high focus during the trial’s home stretch, leading to such wonderful headlines as “Harvey Weinstein’s Abnormal Testicles Are Key Focus of Final Arguments in Trial,” “Harvey Weinstein’s ‘deformed’ genitals could be a deciding factor in his LA rape trial,” and my personal favorite, “Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wife breaks down describing Harvey Weinstein’s ‘fish-like’ penis in court.”
Prosecutors told the jury that in 1999, Weinstein underwent surgery for Fournier’s Gangrene, which forced doctors to remove part of his ballsack and to place his testicles inside his inner thighs. One by one, accusers testified that the disgraced mogul’s genitals were even more repulsive than his face.
Defense lawyers allege that Jane Doe #1, described as “a European actor and model,” changed her story about whether or not she actually had Weinstein’s testicles in her mouth. Their “GOTCHA” moment was that after Weinstein commanded her to “suck his balls,” she at first claimed that she indeed had his balls in his mouth, then changed her story after she learned it was physically impossible for his testicles to have been in her mouth since his testicles were implanted snugly within his thigh. The witness pivoted somewhat and said she had his scrotum in her mouth but only could detect one testicle.
Jane Doe #2, who testified that Weinstein groped her and masturbated in front of her in 2013, said:
His penis was disgusting. It looked like it had been chopped off and sewn back on, like something wasn’t right about it. . . . I didn’t really see a full sack, I literally just saw a penis. I was disgusted.
But the most damning disses of Weinstein’s wineskin came from Jane Doe #4, AKA Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California Governor Gavin Newsom:
Lots of bruises, markings, yellow and green, lots of stretch marks on his belly, very not physically fit at all. . . . [His penis was] kind of fish-like. . . . something was distorted in the testicles . . . Lots of skin, lots of skin down there. . . . And then he puts part of his penis inside of me because he pushes me back against the bed. It’s not staying in because his penis is so weird and messed up. He realizes this. I was just worried I was going to get some disease. It was so gross.
I’m so glad that Mrs. Newsom didn’t elaborate on what she meant about his “fish-like” penis that I can barely contain myself.
During his opening statement, Weinstein’s defense attorney, Mark Werksman, suggested that Mrs. Newsom was “just another bimbo who slept with Harvey Weinstein to get ahead in Hollywood,” and it was refreshing to hear the word “bimbo” again, regardless of context.
Apple-Headed Nuclear-Waste Tranny Accused of Stealing Another Luggage Bag!
On December 1 I informed you, even though you hadn’t asked, of Sam Brinton, a “non-binary” and gay-as-all-get-out government official tasked with ethically disposing of our nation’s nuclear waste, but who seemed more preoccupied with giving seminars in kinky “pup play” and stealing random luggage bags from airports than in keeping us all safe from radiation poisoning.
Well, Brinton is in the news again because he apparently can’t keep his filthy gay paws off other people’s luggage.
Yet another felony warrant has been issued for Brinton, alleging he stole yet another luggage bag on an unspecified date at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas.
Although The New York Post, to its tremendous shame, dutifully uses “they/them” pronouns when referring to this rainbow-spackled fruit fly, at least his mom still uses male pronouns when referring to him:
I have not spoken to him directly, but my daughter has spoken to him though . . . We’re trying to communicate as little as possible because he’s screening calls and all. . . . Mostly, I am just praying for him. My heart is saddened for him right now that he’s dealing with so much. He’s my son. I absolutely love him and support him.
At least Brinton’s mom, unlike her son and the establishment press, can distinguish her son’s ass from a hole in the ground.
England Seeks to Criminalize Catcalling
England’s Crown Prosecution Service has decided that the nation’s women will feel much safer if mere “street harassment” were to be criminalized.
Street harassment includes such nefarious acts as “deliberately walking closely behind someone as they walk home at night” and “making obscene or aggressive comments towards a person.” Activists had also called for things such as wolf-whistling and “staring intently” to be criminalized.
“Every woman should feel safe to walk our streets,” declared England’s Home Secretary Suella Braverman, a brown-skinned woman of Indian descent who resembles Muppet-master Jim Henson’s idea of what a Hindu woman might look like. “We are putting the needs of victims at the heart of our decision, which will mean the criminals who commit these acts face the consequences they deserve.”
Apparently men deserve up to two years in prison for walking closely behind someone.
The easier and more efficient plan would be to prosecute the pedophilic Muslim rape gangs that run rampant throughout Old Blighty and seem to take a sadistic pleasure in deflowering and demoralizing young indigenous British females, but England is no longer designed to cater to the English.
Study: Short People Are Evil
When singer Randy Newman openly called for the mass extermination of the vertically challenged in his 1977 hit song “Short People,” was he wrong?
Everyone has had an unfortunate encounter with a nasty short person, usually male, who attempts to compensate for his inborn deficiencies. Such types are vindictive, petty, bitchy, and prone to strike, like a vengeful cobra, at any moment. It’s penis envy for the height-challenged.
A 2007 study concluded that shorter men are not more aggressive than tall men, at least not when you rap them on the knuckles with a wooden stick. But a 2017 study from the Netherlands concluded that men who were 5’5” were 50% more likely to exhibit signs of jealousy than men who were 6’6”.
A new meta-study by Polish scientists published in Personality and Individual Differences finds that all the hatred directed toward the height-impaired is entirely justified, since the spiteful little shrimpy creeps tend to be off their rockers and entirely devoid of character. The study is titled “The Napoleon complex, revisited: Those high on the Dark Triad traits are dissatisfied with their height and are short.” Researchers surveyed 367 people, nearly two-thirds of whom were men, and concluded that short people “may compensate for their shortness with antagonistic behaviors”:
We conceptualized antagonism as individual differences in the Dark Triad traits (i.e., psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism) and found they were associated with not only being shorter but also with the wish to be taller. . . . We discussed our results from an evolutionary (i.e., calibrating formidability) perspective. . . . The Napoleon complex could be a marker of inferiority as in the complex theory or an adaptive strategy to compensate for diminished intrasexual competitive abilities.
Monika Kozlowska of Poland’s University of Wroclaw drove the wooden stake an inch deeper into the hearts of short men worldwide:
Appearing more powerful may in turn make other people perceive them as taller than they really are. . . . Shorter men with traits such as psychopathy can use them to demand respect, impost costs on others and impress romantic partners. We propose that psychological formidability may provide advantages in survival and mating domains that offset losses in physical formidability.
It’s a relief to receive scientific confirmation that there is no such thing as “heightism.” In truth, the only things keeping short people down are their own rotten personalities and the immutable law of gravity.
Wanna Kill Yourself? The Canadian Government Will Help
The dystopian 1973 sci-fi film Soylent Green was set in a future where the state sanctioned both cannibalism and suicide. The film was set in the year 2022.
I try not to pay any attention to Canada, which is why I was unaware that the country legalized euthanasia in 2016. Last year, over 10,000 Canadians availed themselves of this government service — ten times as many as did the first year it was available. Why, it’s almost as if the ghost of the late lamented Jack Kevorkian now runs their national healthcare service.
A 37-year-old Canadian woman named Jennyfer Hatch, who suffers from Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, ruffled some feathers when she recorded a pro-euthanasia commercial making it look as if her imminent suicide was a wonderfully spiritual experience.
And 65-year-old Les Landry of Medicine Hat, Alberta recently made headlines when he announced that he will avail himself of the nation’s MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) program because he fears he will no longer be able to afford to live.
Landry is a former truck driver who suffered a hernia, which led to extremely high blood pressure, strokes, and epilepsy, which led to his driver’s license being suspended. He claims he lost state benefits in May when he turned 65, because Canada will apparently give you more welfare money for being under 65 and physically disabled than it will for being over 65 and disabled. He says he fears that an imminent rent hike next month may leave him out in the streets in the unforgiving Alberta winter:
MAID is when the pain of living is more than the fear of death. How do you shut out the switch to both emotional and physical pain in poverty? If poverty takes somebody in a wheelchair and basically makes them homeless, what’s the solution? I don’t want to go homeless. I don’t want to end up living in a van so I can’t make the van payments. I don’t want to end up homeless. Who would want to be homeless at 16, never mind 65? Before I turned 65, I was livable, I wasn’t suffering, I had my budget all set out, I’d know exactly how much I was going to get. And it was manageable. Now it’s like, I don’t know what I’m going to get from month to month. Sooner or later it’s going to get to a point where I just won’t be able to afford to live.
Landry noted how easy it was to download an application form, check off a few boxes, and sign off on one’s suicide.
One should be wary of any government willing to help you kill yourself.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
Who Drinks More, the Rich or the Poor?
White Altruism Revealed
The Union Jackal, September 2023
The Worst Week Yet: September 17-23, 2023
The Virgin Queen Chihuahua Has Spoken!
Having It All: America Reaps the Benefits of Feminism
The Virgin Queen Chihuahua Has Spoken!
Donald Trump: The Jews’ Psycho Ex-Girlfriend