2,155 words
It happened on August 9th, a date that carries a lot of bad juju. It happened in Wilson County, North Carolina, which has a population of about seventy-five thousand. 55.83% white, 39.33% black. Median income $33,000. Of households with children, less than half are married couples. 16.5% have a female householder with no husband present; 30.9% are “non-families” (presumably, non-married couples). Opioid overdose fatalities have tripled in Wilson since 2012. In short, it is a poor county with all the attendant social problems that now plague rural America.
But in the United States, no one who is “anyone” cares about what happens in Wilson. And that certainly applies to what happened to Cannon Hinnant. As most of my readers know, August 9th is the date that five-year-old Cannon was shot in the head at point-blank range by his 25-year-old black next-door neighbor Darius (no kidding) Sessoms. The murder occurred in the presence of Cannon’s two young sisters (ages seven and eight). While Sessoms fled the scene in his Toyota, Austin Hinnant, the little boy’s father, emerged from the house screaming, then cradled the dying boy in his arms. A neighbor who happened to be looking out her window watched in horror and disbelief as the scene unfolded. “They’ll never get over it,” she said of the family.
Darius Sessoms’ mugshot.
Apparently, Cannon was on his bike, playing in the yard with his sisters. Sessoms simply walked up to the boy, put a gun directly to his head, and pulled the trigger. His motive? No one knows for sure, but it has been suggested that Sessoms may have been “provoked” by the fact that Cannon had ridden his bike into Sessom’s yard. The murderer was apprehended hours later and is being held without bond, facing a charge of first-degree murder.
It’s one of the most horrific killings I’ve heard about in a while. People are murdered all the time in this country, but every now and then there’s one that really makes you feel something. You feel sick and angry, and you know that this one is going to stay with you. Said the neighbor: “My first reaction was he’s playing with the kids. For a second, I thought, ‘That couldn’t happen.’ People don’t run across the street and kill kids.” Then, inevitably, she added, “It’s almost like seeing a movie and then all of a sudden it dawns on you it’s not a movie.” No ma’am, it’s not like a movie. In a movie, it would be a white man shooting a black child.
The murder of Cannon Hinnant isn’t just “senseless,” it’s an obscenity. To say that it fills one with righteous indignation would be a gross understatement. Hopefully, Sessoms will be executed for this crime, since North Carolina has the death penalty. But the thought is curiously unsatisfying; like putting down a rabid dog. No, there are bigger fish here who ought to fry.
The story made local news, but despite the horrific nature of the crime, the big national news outlets did not pick it up — not for a while, at least. Nevertheless, the story began to be shared widely on social media. Those who circulated it agreed on two major points. First, the crime is utterly heinous. Second, if the races were reversed, it would have been plastered across every front page in America, and the talking heads would never shut up about it. It would be an occasion for warning us about the deadly rise of “white supremacism.” Blame would be laid squarely on the shoulders of — who else? — Donald Trump. The crime would be used as an excuse to deplatform dozens more, perhaps hundreds more, conservatives. BLM and Antifa would respond with mayhem of a kind that would make the last two months seem as peaceful as a Japanese tea ceremony.
So far as I can establish, Tucker Carlson seems to have been the first in the national news media to cover the story. On August 13th, he devoted a brief one minute and thirty-six seconds to it, simply reporting the facts without commentary. The next night he returned to the story in a segment that was longer, but still well under four minutes. This time, with guest Nancy Grace, he tried to address the question of why the story was not being reported more widely. I’ll return to what was said a little later, as it is very revealing.
You can buy Jef Costello’s Heidegger in Chicago here
Also on the 14th, CNN finally covered the story on its website, devoting a mere two hundred words to it. Reportedly, this occurred only after there had been widespread criticism of the network on social media. They, and other outlets, were accused of burying the story of Cannon Hinnant because it “didn’t fit their narrative.” By this point, the hashtags #SayHisName, #SAYHISNAMECANNONHINANT, and #CannonHinnant had taken over the trending page of Twitter. “Just imagine if the races had been reversed,” or words to that effect, was tweeted by many. On August 15th, ABC and the Washington Post finally covered the story.
Needless to say, none of these outlets entertained the possibility that the media and the Left’s non-stop anti-white rhetoric might have created the conditions that made possible this child’s murder. Even Fox wouldn’t go there. Not even Tucker. Now, I’m a fan of Tucker Carlson. Within the strictures imposed on him by the mainstream media, I think he actually manages to say some things that are rather daring. This was the one time when I truly felt ashamed of him. Apparently, Tucker was afraid to dish up some version of the “had the races been reversed” argument himself, so he tried to get Nancy Grace to do it for him. She didn’t take the bait.
As I mentioned, Grace appeared on a short segment of Tucker’s show on Friday, August 14th. After reminding his audience about the murder of Cannon Hinnant, Tucker said “The question is, why haven’t the media covered this story? What about it don’t they like?” Humm. Then he turned to Grace, asking her to “make sense of this for us.” Grace then basically proceeded to summarize what we know about the killing, then simply repeated Tucker’s query: “You’re right, this case has not been covered and I wonder why, too.”
But Tucker didn’t give up. He keeps pressing Nancy: “Look, I’ve said many times, and I mean it, that I don’t think you should draw broad societal conclusions from a single horrific crime. . . But to ignore something completely, and they ignore murders, by the way, every day on the Southside of Chicago as well, you really get the feeling that news coverage is guided purely by political imperatives, purely.” In others, might the press have political motives for not covering the murder of a white child by a black man? What say you, Nancy?
Amazingly, pathetically, Grace responded: “Well, it seems to me that right now, with the concern over COVID and not going to back to school and the issues surrounding that and the protests all around the country, even attacking a Ronald McDonald house while sick children were inside cowering, that’s all the headlines.” In other words, with all the COVID coverage, the media just had no room for poor Cannon. Then she quickly added, her voice rising, “What about this boy?! What about justice in this case?! What about my children and your children? They deserve to get just as much attention as all of the other headlines.” Tucker ended the interview at this point, calling Grace “one of the most direct people on television.” One hopes he was being ironic.
You can either take this exchange as an unfortunate display of cowardice, or as a kind of esoteric communication — what liberals like to call a “dog whistle.” Tucker posed questions that all of his viewers know the real answers to, regardless of what Nancy Grace said. What is it about the story that the media “don’t like”? What “political imperatives” caused them to ignore it? And what did Grace mean when she said “What about my children and your children? They deserve to get as much attention as all the other headlines.” Did she mean to suggest that white lives matter too? But perhaps I’m being too charitable.
Even if this was some kind of indirect way of communicating the obvious, the fact that the obvious cannot be directly communicated is an indication of what a terrible predicament we are in. It’s not like I’m expecting Tucker to plug The White Nationalist Manifesto. But would it really be career-ending to point out that had the races been reversed, coverage would have been different? Would it really be career-ending to point out that the anti-white bile spewed in this country on a daily basis might have encouraged Darius Sessoms to murder this child? Apparently so.
We will see what Tucker says in the next few days, but I am not optimistic. What needs to be said — what must be said — is that the Left has blood on its hands, just as surely as does Mr. Sessoms.
Cannon’s mother, Bonny Waddell (who was not, apparently, living with the child at the time) apparently gets what is going on here. She posted a passionate statement on Facebook that begins as follows: “THIS WAS NOT JUST BECAUSE MY BABY WAS RIDING A BIKE!! DONT LET THIS SOCIAL MEDIA AND NEWS FOOL YOU!” She then went on to say, “We will get our justice and I’m taking every damn body down right with him! . . . I lost my child, I lost my innocent child, and no one can give me him back. I will burn this country down if it’s what it’ll take to see this man burn in hell. I’m ready to flip this county upside down.”
That was posted just a day or so after the murder. A little later, the mother issued another statement, which has occasioned widespread comment: “My baby didn’t see color, my baby made sure you knew he loved you even if he only knew you five minutes [I don’t care] what damn color you are!” In other words, this grieving mother felt obliged to defend her dead child by reassuring us that he wasn’t a racist. What is the implication here? That if the child were “racist” he would have deserved to die?
I suspect, in fact, that little Cannon probably was a “racist,” at least by the standards of today’s Left. As has been demonstrated in psychological tests, young children naturally prefer their own kind and feel fear and aversion toward those of other races. This was the whole point of Newsweek’s infamous “Is Your Baby Racist?” issue. It takes years of brainwashing to get people to suppress these natural instincts. Brainwashing which, sadly, appears to have had its effect on Cannon’s parents.
You see, it has emerged that the night before the killing, Austin Hinnant actually had Darius Sessoms over for dinner. Now, to provide you with some perspective, Sessoms was previously convicted of felony larceny of firearms, misdemeanor maintaining a place for a controlled substance, and felony marijuana possession, all in 2016. Perhaps Mr. Hinnant thought he had turned over a new leaf. Sessom’s brother, by the way, is a convicted child molester.
I can’t help thinking that if Mr. Hinnant were just a bit racist, he would not have chosen to live near Darius Sessoms, much less socialize with him, and Cannon would still be alive. The good kind of racism protects our children from savages.
Austin Hinnant thought he knew Darius Sessoms. But there is no knowing the Darius Sessoms of this world, not really, not ever. What was it Kipling said? “Half devil, half child”?
While normal people feel disgust at the murder of Cannon Hinnant — as well as the Leftists who promoted it, the liberals who covered it up, and the conservative eunuchs who will say nothing about it — some of Sessoms’ brethren have taken to Twitter to celebrate. Dante Salvador tweeted, “Blew his little white privileged brains clean out of his head! #BlackLivesMatter.” Gosh, I wonder who taught Mr. Salvador about “white privilege”? The Hinnants, living in a poor neighborhood in a poor county in a poor state, don’t seem that privileged to me. “[I don’t] give a shit he is white its time for revenge we tired shit over with now we shooting yall go cry to yo mama,” wrote another. Don’t expect any mainstream media coverage of this either.
Kipling was wrong. They are more than half-devil.
If you want to support our work, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
38 comments
This calls to mine the recent protests in Seattle and Portland, where Andy Ngo, I believe, or perhaps another alternative media journalist, tweeted a video of a 5-ish year old black child, a little girl iirc, carrying a sign that said “FUCK THE PO-LICE” (a dog whistle for fuck whitey) and was cued on camera to repeat the slogan verbally.
A white woman has to defend her DEAD child who was killed by a black man in cold blood, defend him and say he wasn’t racist, yet black children can walk around with cameras pointed at them saying “fuck the police” (aka fuck whitey) and people (sick, disgusting people) think it is cute.
*calls to mind
It’s white liberals who are sick. I have thought liberalism is a mental disease (as Dr. Michael Savage says on the radio) for decades, but I used to think (in truly liberal fashion, I’m embarrassed to admit!) that people could be cured of liberal mental disorder via superior education – simply deconstructing the false liberal racial narrative. That was incorrect. Liberal disorder taps into something very deep (ie, genetic) in certain white people, and is thus mostly incurable for society at large. Liberalism is the phenotypical expression of underlying defective genes. Those genetic components need to be identified, and then bred out of the white race, either via embryonic engineering, or robust classical eugenics (anyone exhibiting past race-liberal attitudes MUST be excluded from the Ethnostate, and future whites born in the Ethnostate must be exiled should they ever exhibit race liberal tendencies; over a century this will mostly eliminate the defect).
I cannot overemphasize this point: though we must speak the language of relatively inclusive white nationalism, we must secretly understand ourselves to be “white nationalist nationalists”. The Ethnostate can only be for racial rightists; this must be incorporated into the Founding charter (there will still be normal political disagreements within the Ethnostate pertaining to non-racial matters, of course).
I guess about now is a good time to share with children: “The Talk” by John Derbyshire, Aug 8th, 2012.
This got him fired from The National Review, which has since gone down hill I believe.
I searched for Derbyshire’s article on 8-8-12, but was unable to locate it. Could you post a link? I do admit I am technology-challenged from time to time. Thanks.
Hi Alexandra,
Here’s a link to it from Taki’s Magazine; an identarian publication.
The Talk
If this doesn’t work, please reply & I’ll post pdf & Word copies of it on my own website.
Note that Googling for it first brings up hits for “The Progressive Response” to it which is a satrical rewrite based upon the progressive canon that “Diversity is Our Greatest Good”.
Ever notice how when white children are murdered by blacks, we don’t have to fish for 6 year old high school yearbook pictures to find a photo that is genuinely innocent and sympathetic?
If our subjugated people had any self-respect, a posse would be clamoring to get inside that jail as we speak and deliver proper justice to the savage subhuman monster. Cannon was supposed to start kindergarten today. Give it a few days. We’ll just move on, like we always do. This time, we can’t.
Dammmmn. Powerful.
Also recall the small child who was thrown from the third floor in a Minnesota mall a while back, and Mercer’s recent article informed me more about the Tyler wingate slaying. Jessica chambers. This is epidemic. Notice how in wingate they only showed the part of the video where he was hit once and went down. That one hit didn’t kill him. He was savagely beaten after that, but the media adjudged it was “too graphic to show.” You can’t even find the full footage on the internet. Now, did the media ever regard the Rodney king beating as too graphic for our eyes? It was plastered on every outlet for weeks. The edited video gives one the impression that wingate was fragile, and that the killing was more in the realm of manslaughter.
I don’t understand what the media hope to achieve from this misrepresentation. Who is behind this and what do they want?
“I don’t understand what the media hope to achieve from this misrepresentation. Who is behind this and what do they want?”
Look into the Frankfurt School. A bunch of Jewish intellectuals didn’t like the powerhouse that was a racially conscious Europe. After Hitler was defeated, they turned their focus on America. In order for economic Marxism to succeed (since the “prophecies” of the working class revolution didn’t come to pass in WWI), they determined they had to destroy the West (America) from within — eliminate their sense of racial consciousness/pride, as well as destroy their moral and aesthetic sense. We’re talking about high-level warfare here, not on the battlefield with guns, but in the battlefield of the mind.
Today’s media, and most of the rest of the Leftist establishment, as far as I can tell, are just the “useful idiots” who have imbibed this genius-level deconstructive/destructive strategy from much brighter minds and are playing their role in the game like pawns on a chessboard.
I will finish with this, as I mentioned in the post below. For me, the Jewish Question — in the fullest sense of the term — is by far the most important one. Blacks, Hispanics, and other “minorities” could never organize and mount a successful counterattack on the West. It takes a group with not only a motive to destroy the West, but a high IQ to mastermind the attack. But this isn’t just about the Frankfurt school, and other Jewish intellectuals, in my book. It is about the West’s spiritual foundation itself. We are often described as Judeo-Christian. Judaism is Jew-worship: the tribal god Yahweh, ruthless, genocidal, and xenophobic (Jews are the center of the universe); and Christianity is itself actual Jew-worship: they literally worship a particular Jewish MAN as God! The West has got to purge this Jew-worship fetish from its consciousness. Whether its the Left putting into practice the purposely destructive ideology of Marxist Jews, or whether its the “Right” (Christian conservatives) pontificating about a “colorblind” society and loving your enemy, they’re coming from both angles and the end result is going to be the eradication of European man from the earth.
Sadly, this started out as a great comment, needlessly marred by misunderstanding about Christianity. It’s true that the Faith is not good for the white man today. It’s untrue that this seeming enmity between Christianity and white preservation is inherent to the Faith, as opposed to a liberal deformation of it. Jesus was a Jew (rejected and crucified by Jews!), but the Christ transcends ethnic (and human) categories.
I suggest you explore the real issue (for you): assuming the non-existence of God, and the priority of white preservation, should white nationalists pursue a strategy of de-Christianization, or one of attempting to cleanse the Faith of its race-liberal heresies, and then coopt it as an ally to white preservation (or at least neutralize it as an enemy of such)?
I’d be interested in your and others’ opinions on this matter, which I think is one of the foundational strategic questions white nationalists face.
Ancient Slovenian culture was disgusted with this Semitic proto-communism, forced upon Indo-Europeans by fire and sword of Germanic barbarians:
“Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.”
Matthew 10:34-37 KJV
Christianity, New Testament included, is as filthy and as moronic as Islam or any other proto-communist cult born in low IQ deserts.
This sounds like crazed conspiracy theory to me. What about Einstein? What about the Holocaust? Why would you continue to impugn the most persecuted people who have done the most for humanity?
Trevor Goodchild:
What, exactly, are you calling “crazed conspiracy theory”? The Frankfurt School bit? Because that is documented fact. I suggest you become acquainted with scholar/author Kevin MacDonald and his work. There has been a concerted effort among a group of influential Left-leaning (i.e. Marxist) Jewish intellectuals to discredit and destroy the West, in order to advance the interests of their own people.
Now does that mean I despise Jews? Does it mean I don’t recognize Jewish genius (Einstein, in your example)? Does it mean I deny that Jews have been persecuted, or that I want to see Jews persecuted or killed? Quite the contrary. I admire them. As a group, they are probably the smartest people on earth (measured by IQ). I believe there are more Nobel winners who were Jewish than anyone else. I acknowledge them as a legitimate group with legitimate group interests, and the right to exist. I would never harm a Jewish person or anyone else for that matter unless my life was threatened, and absolutely abhor these unsophisticated racists who think they’re doing us all a favor by shooting up a synagogue. But when it comes to their activist efforts to discredit, demoralize, and destroy my people to the benefit of their own, then I have a problem with that.
This is a very complex topic. Of course, any time you talk of “this group doing such and such” or “that group having such and such traits” you are generalizing. Even if the quality holds true for the majority, there will always be exceptions. I don’t believe there’s any kind of grand Jewish world conspiracy (as some have believed and promulgated), I simply recognize that they are a distinct people with distinct interests and sometimes the smartest among them have worked against the European races in order to advance their own interests.
Every group of people deserves its own homeland. Historical causes and effects are complicated. But had the Jews’ sense of “chosenness” hadn’t antagonized the nations throughout their history, perhaps they would have never been invaded by the Romans, their Temple destroyed, and their people dispersed throughout the Empire. Maybe the Holocaust would have never happened. I don’t know. But what I do know is this: had the Jews never lived among us, they would have never had the opportunity to be persecuted by us and to then feel the need to seek revenge by destroying the foundations of Western Civilization in order to “save” their people. Again, if you doubt this is a real thing, just do some of your own research.
I’m glad to see you are learning. Of old the romans broke teuton power, but in their humiliation they were advanced in the qualities that make a good civilization. Now another Mediterranean group has been forced to collar the Teutons, but in time this will break them to the useful and the good.
Best wishes!
They want us dead, six feet under, all of us, because we are White, it’s really that simple. There is nothing to ponder, nothing to study, puzzle out, make excuses for, listen to “experts” about, try to reform, reason with, debate or compromise with. Such activities are merely a way of denying the terrible truth; most White people are signing their own death warrants and those of their children and grandchildren when they accept the Left’s premises that White people are “racist” for favoring one’s own kind, a natural, healthy impulse. Such racism is encouraged by the Left on the part of colored people as a weapon against White people and this poor child and his family are just the most recent casualties of this decades old war against White people.
The worst is yet to come and the U.S. Government and state and local governments are at best indifferent and at worst, encouraging colored people. Soros’s DAs in places like Philadelphia let black murderers run amok, DJT releases thousands of violent criminals, mostly colored trying to get black/Hispanic votes that will never appear and the media hits the snooze button on atrocities against White people. The next time the U.S. Government gets its nuts in a vise in a big war such as for “our greatest ally” or Taiwan White people have to say: “Let the colored people man the ships, fly the planes, be the cannon fodder” since apparently, we are deplorables and the coloreds are the Government’s pets anyway and the Government plans to replace us with them.
Believing that rabid animals are “just like us” is what results in these tragedies. We have been made into sitting ducks by the constant drilling that “we are all the same”. We are not.
I find it impossible to comprehend the monstrosity of the mind that committed this murder. Any rational society would be testing for such and eliminating them from the population by any means necessary.
Likely it will be discovered that the assailant has a history of insanity and/or was substance-impaired, and therefore this was not, officially, a “racially motivated” incident. And this is how MSM will call it, if they call it at all.
BUT, the 2017 Minneapolis police shooting of white Justine Damond was ALSO not “motivated” by race, AND neither was the 2020 death-in-police custody of George Floyd.
The point is that NONE of these 3 incidents were “racially motivated”, but MSM says one of them was, and thus the world is turned upside-down.
It is this colossal and criminal media power that is squarely the culprit in the current crisis, for almost all to see. And this current incident ought to make that clear to almost all – or at least enough of the electorate to tip the November election.
The negroes are a plague, a blight, and a curse; they were happy in the jungle clearings and savannas of Africa. So if there is such a place as Hades, Purgatory or Tartarus, I certainly hope the Lopes, de Wolfe and other families are being slowly and systematically worked over there. Surely the Sephardic Jews should pay reparations to the state governments for bringing hell on earth to North America.
Who is responsible ?
This worthless ape is primarily responsible, and then blacks collectively as a distinct biological group are responsible, and they have said as much according to those Twitter posts.
The negroid responsible – it has no real name that is meaningful, as blacks are not sufficiently differentiated by human standards, should be punished of course. But any law that has to encompass negros must include torture, as blacks have no remorse and don’t seem to especially fear death or even perceive it as a consequence of their own actions.
Its death is a convenience for whites, but it should not be seen as a punishment for blacks or the imposition of justice. Blacks should be tortured to death if they commit these crimes through new laws, because they feel pain. And in a just system, collective punishment should be brought on the ‘black community’.
Then Jews are responsible for fomenting, inciting, amplifying and directing black violent dysfunction and resentment towards whites. Jews are really the sole maintainers of a framework of lies that misrepresent black dysfunction, violence, failure and primitivism as a misunderstood demand for justice because of white racism to whites. At the very least those Jews involved in fomenting this stuff should be punished for their crimes collectively.
The punishment should be that these Jews are made to suffer the same black violence as suffered by their white victims, as Jewish incitement has helped create these white victims.
Finally there is also an issue of collective white responsibility. If this were any other topic, some issue in the workplace or whatever, and there is consistent failure to respond adequately to a problem or set of circumstances, then at some point someone has to take responsibility and changes need to be made to correct the problem . But because barriers to identifying the problem are continually put up and punishments, shaming and incentives laid down, whites just want an easy life.
Whites at some point have to be willing to make sacrifices so no more white children like Cannon are murdered. They have to accept all the facts as they are, and they must fully reject sentimental Jewish propaganda about race. They must take collective action as whites.
Whites must accept that all the norms and comforts and stability they want are not an end in themselves and life has put them in a situation where simply keeping your head down, obeying the law, trying to keep your job at any cost and hoping everything will go back to normal isn’t an option anymore. More is being asked of whites than that.
Just a quick aside about these negro comments on Twitter: It’s been my view for a long time that social media should not be for the scum of society. It should not be in their hands to give them a ‘voice’. Blacks should not have access to Twitter any more than have access to guns.
Wonderful comment. Agreed with everything you stated. This should be an article in its own right. Going along to get along is, as you said, no longer an option. Comfort is complacency. If we do not rise, NOW, then there will be nothing left to work for. There will be nothing left to make money for. There will be nothing left to protect. Are we keeping our heads down to be safe until the storm passes? The storm shall never pass. It is upon us. Do we leave this world with a whimper or with a bang? I choose the bang.
This comment is also wonderful. You’ve nailed once again (as others have in the past) the core issues. If our race goes extinct, what does the human future matter (at least to us)? And, what is our duty to the future, both considered abstractly, and in terms of our own specific descendants? Thus, is it ethical simply to do nothing – to, say, live a good and honorable life as a Christian, a white man, a family man, and/or an American citizen, but without making any special effort to save our race and civilization?
In ‘betwixt’ the hurlyburly of quotidian life, so much more complicated for Americans post-1960s than for past generations, I’ve wrestled with these questions for 40 years, constantly reproaching myself for having very early understood the essential racial dilemma, but not having really utilized my talents on behalf of arresting the decline of my people (beyond years of on/off volunteer anti-immigration activism, and endlessly hectoring friends and internet strangers to awaken to our ever-worsening racial plight).
I hope I can do better in the future.
A few more of the many white infants murdered by blacks the USA:
2017 Kane Friess-Wylie, aged 2
2016 Savannah Walker, aged 4
2015 Logan Tipton, aged 6
2014 Mercedes Blair, aged 4
2013 Antonio Santiago, aged 13 months, shot point-blank in the head
2011 Allison Griffor, aged 5.
The “root causes” argument says that blacks are so violent because they come from the slums, when in truth they live in slums because they’re so violent. I’d be super cautious from now on since the MSM cover up of this adorable little boy’s murder, which presumably blacks all know about by now, is effectively incitement for blacks and Antifa taking it to the next step, such as taking out an entire family at the park or burning their house down with them in it.
We see the “peaceful protest” and “hands up, don’t shoot” ruse effectively neutralizing police control and providing cover for rioting, looting, arson, and stomping whites into puddles of blood like that fellow in Portland last night. In the same way, blacks’ getting you to drop your guard for one moment by your responding to a question intended for no other purpose than sizing up your vulnerability may get you killed. Avoidance is the rule imposed on us by blacks.
The big story for our future, however, is the stupefying lack of will on the part of the Republicans and Trump White House suggesting their inaction is assent, if not complicity, on the grounds that no men could possibly lose so much of their manhood nor exhibit over and over the sort of caution cowards borrow from fear yet attribute to policy.
Who is responsible?
Anyone who ever thought or taught Love thy Enemy.
Agreed. I’m a bit of an outcast in most circles, even conservative ones, but I think the perversity of worshiping a Jewish man as God and thus hanging on every word attributed to him has rendered a large portion of the West braindead and immoral. I mean, somewhere, some pious White moron is praying for the soul of Sessoms, hoping he will somehow “get saved”. What kind of reality would that be if someone such as this useless thug could say the magic words and be whisked off to paradise for all eternity, when other people, who lived good lives, will burn in hell for all eternity simply because they didn’t suck up to the Jew-God?
I’ve said it before and I will say it again: Western Man is doomed until he can shed the shackles of the perverted Jew-worship that is the Christian religion.
I suspect that your actual knowledge of the Christian religion beyond caricature is nearly nonexistent. In your example, there is nothing contradictory at all in how classical (ie, pre-liberal-infected and deformed) Christianity would approach this monster. He would be encouraged to repent (sincerely). This would not save him from being hung (or stoned, decapitated, drawn and quartered, etc) for his crime, however – nor would it be any guarantee that his soul would be saved. He must pay, and would under a Christian dispensation (in this world or the next, though ideally in both). God is the soul’s judge, however, not you, me, or some lachrymose liberal, and only God can read the human heart (as is said; this means mouthing “magic words” doesn’t get you anywhere unless the repentance is sincere – and even if it is, many theologians have believed there will still be divine punishment for the thug’s soul, though not ultimate damnation).
Of course, all religions might be fairy tales. I don’t know if God exists in any form yet conceived, or at all. But the ancestral faith of our fathers is not that of primitives. It has accrued an immense intellectual edifice over the centuries. Does that mean that, even assuming the Faith’s final truth, all its mysteries have been plumbed, all problems resolved? I don’t think so. Theology, like philosophy, is a continuous work in progress (and with much regress along the way).
The real issue for white preservationists wrt the Christian Question is whether race liberalism is theologically necessary, as most Christians today unthinkingly assume (in conformance with hegemonic thought structures, today as always in the past, too), or unnecessary and even outright incorrect, as I believe. The answer to this will likely require great theological and philosophical understanding and subtlety.
You can “suspect” all you like. One thing I do know for certain, though, with regards to Christian theology, is that it undeniably worships a Jew as God. That is the perverse core of the religion, and everything else you mention is just fluff that may or may not serve some kind of utilitarian purpose.
Not quite, not as you put it. Christianity worships Jesus Christ, understood as the second ‘consubstantial’ person of the Holy Trinity, who was incarnated as a Jew. But his birth supersedes, and his crucifixion and resurrection desacralize, Jewry. There is nothing theologically special about Jews today, at least within the classical Christian religion (there is a monstrosity called “Christian Zionism”, which is composed of well-meaning but thoroughly brainwashed morons, that disagrees; but then there have been many heresies through time, and there is no reason that heresy should be thought of as a thing of the past; actually, we live in a time of tremendous and terrible heresy, not least wrt racial and national survival issues). Those Christians who accord some special place or privilege to Jews today are idiots, not “true Christians” (more precisely: their sycophancy towards the Jews is not theologically mandatory). There are idiots everywhere (including among white nationalists).
With all due respect, I am very well-versed in Christian theology, having been a student of not only the Bible but of church history and theological development for more than twenty-five years.
From my perspective, you can spin this all you want (“Christianity worships Jesus Christ, understood as the second ‘consubstantial’ person of the Holy Trinity, who was incarnated as a Jew. But his birth supersedes, and his crucifixion and resurrection desacralize, Jewry”), but I’m not impressed. If the religion of Christianity is even true in the first place (and I don’t think it is), whether a pre-existent divine being “incarnated” as a human being, or whether a human being was divinized, at the end of the day Christians worship a Jewish man as God. There’s no getting around this, because as the creeds state, whatever else Jesus was he was undoubtedly also fully human and the type of human he was was a male Palestinian Jew — to deny such is to deny the faith, the gospel. This perverse Jew worship seems to be something of a blind spot to most race-conscious White Christians, as if they don’t really grasp the implications of their belief system. Doubly so for those Christians who despise the Jews as a people yet nonetheless worship a son of Israel as God Himself. All I can say is the joke is on them.
This perverse Jew worship seems to be something of a blind spot to most race-conscious White Christians, as if they don’t really grasp the implications of their belief system. Doubly so for those Christians who despise the Jews as a people yet nonetheless worship a son of Israel as God Himself. All I can say is the joke is on them.
There is no blind spot. We just don’t care about his genealogical Jewishness. He certainly wasn’t Jewish in any other respect.
Has the inaptly named Mr Dante Salvador been suspended from Twitter for his ebonics screeds?
Surely under their Terms of Service, which, as we have all seen, Twitter zealously enforces, incitement to violence and collective punishment of an ethnic group is streng verboten?
The most telling remark, and by far, the most frightening that we all have to be aware of, is that of Mr. Salvador in the last paragraph. Those two semi-sentences need to be posted far and wide, for they are as dangerous as the stupid Corona Virus which we discuss and fear day and night. I would say that anywhere from 10% to 30% of BLM and Antifa Blacks subscribe to this scrambled viewpoint, word for word, in their heart of hearts, and in their sodden brains. Copy this post out, and teach it to your kids secretly, but tell them to keep their mouths shut about it. This is how we have to live now — knowing the truth but keeping as quiet as possible about it. Thank heavens we have a platform here for the truth, and courageous and alert writers as well, who ferret out these remarks and re-post them before they are ‘removed’ by the ever-vigilant Left, that actually protects these creatures of the night. “Know Thy Enemy”.
How were you able to write this piece without even a hint of fedposting? Chapeau.
That Dante Salvador guy seems Hispanic:
https://twitter.com/milck1979/status/1293954214981402624
He also says he meant it as satire/sarcasm.
https://twitter.com/lesleesays/status/1294147685457461253
Re the opening line “It happened on August 9th, a date that carries a lot of bad juju” :
Presumably referring to the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
Out of curiosity I searched for other August 9ths:
1969: Followers of Charles Manson murder pregnant actress Sharon Tate.
1945: Nagasaki is devastated by the Fat Man atomic bomb.
378 Battle of Adrianople: A Roman army led by Emperor Valens is defeated by the Visigoths.
All dates must suck for someone somewhere.
To her credit, Candace Owens also hinted at the issue:
https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1294682409871519744?s=09
The most horrific murder of a white child I have ever heard about (and I have read about many) is the black woman burning a white boy to death with a cutting torch.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.