1,922 words

In early April, a young Londoner called Finbar Sullivan was pointlessly stabbed to death in the suburb of Primrose Hill, allegedly by a pair of non-whites called Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu and Khalid Abdulqadir, whose very names evoke the final faint moans of a dying alphabet. Unlike his reported attackers, Finbar Sullivan came from a well-off, well-adjusted, upper-middle-class white family: his grandfather was a Hollywood cinematographer on movies like Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Elsewhere in London during this same time-span, it turned out the real-life Planet of the Apes had already dawned.

As previously reported on Counter-Currents, over in the borough of Clapham, hundreds of strange, ontologically uncertain beings known by the mainstream media only as “youths” went on a rampage through the high street, looting stores, letting off fireworks, assaulting police and security guards, and generally chimping out like angry bonobos. At first sight, the teenagers, who had organized the riot online after sending out invitations via social media, calling for attendees to bring their own nitrous oxide and cannabis lest the shelves of Sainsbury’s turned out to be low on stock, seemed to be out of control barbarians. Yet photographs of the chimper-outers subsequently published in UK newspapers demonstrated they were actually highly intelligent, somehow managing to coordinate affairs so that, remarkably, every time they appeared in front of a security camera, you could only ever see them from behind, thus making them completely unidentifiable to police officers.

However, these appearances later proved deceptive. It turning out the generic “unruly youths” were in fact very specifically groups almost entirely of black unruly youths, as rare reverse-images like the below prove:

Viewers of UK TV news still were not allowed to see this wonderful array of diverse black faces on their screens, however, with scenes like the above having all the miscreants’ faces blurred out when footage was broadcast for Very Important Legal Reasons. “No, you’ve not got cataracts, apparently we have to blur them,” complained the host of Right-leaning (t)rolling news-channel GB News. Ostensibly this was for legal privacy, but it was widely interpreted nonetheless as also being due to a cowardly desire upon behalf of the authorities to obscure the clear fact of the rioters’ race.

As GB News observed, whilst the Clapham riots continued, the area’s local Labour Party MP, the noted black race-Marxist Bell Ribeiro-Addy, was tweeting not about the embarrassing racial crimewave, but something called “International Transgender Day of Visibility”. What a shame all the area’s blacks weren’t as highly visible on-camera as its many out-and-proud trannies were.

(Bad)Enoch Was Wrong!

Was the fact the “youths” were overwhelmingly negroid relevant or not? The “youths” themselves certainly thought so, the riot-organizers’ Snapchat messages demonstrating plainly that, should police officers dare to intervene to stop their fun, the cops could easily be warded off just by calling them “rasict” (although calling them “racist” would doubtless have been even more effective).

However, the Nigerian-raised black leader of the UK Conservative Party, Kemi Badenoch, disagreed, saying “those making snide comments about race or black kids” were mistaken. It was not the race of the kids involved which was the salient factor, she said, but the permissive society within which they had been brought up, where there was “a total collapse of consequences” as figures of adult authority had allowed themselves to become far too weak to be feared (on the night following the Clapham riots, one soft cop was pictured playing basketball with the area’s youths as if nothing had even happened). Over in Kemi’s own Nigerian homeland, black parents, police, and teachers still sensibly provided “clear boundaries” and did not “wring their hands or look the other way.”

Kemi does have a certain point. Elders in lands like Nigeria are indeed stricter than those here in the West—probably because they are still legally allowed to be, thanks to the absence of restrictive Left-wing human rights laws which prevent adults hitting children who deserve it with fists, canes, belts, hammers, loose cactuses, dead fish and iron bars, punishments which are still allowed in “Lagos and Nairobi.” (Well OK, technically they’re actually not, but Nigerians just ignore stupid foreign-influenced child protection laws and beat delinquent infants anyway, considering this the obvious way for normal human beings to proceed, correctly regarding any regulations to the contrary as white Western moral colonialism in action.) This is why many black parents living in London are now sending their offspring back home to Africa to be schooled there, as the Third World, where teachers are still permitted to smash knife-wielding teens in the face with breezeblocks and laugh about it, is deemed to now be safer and more disciplined than the soft First World is.

This is a real headline, not satire.

Yet Badenoch somewhat misses the point here. Any child parceled away from London to school in Africa, no matter their race, would probably grow up better behaved than in England, due to the incredible strictness of African teachers. And yet, over in ill-disciplined London, it does appear to be more-or-less exclusively the black ones who go on collective mob-based street-rampages, not browns or whites. Such observations are not “snide comments,” they require actual explanation.

When black kids riot, as in Clapham, it often seems to hold no greater motivational purpose beyond seeming like a jolly exciting jape. Sometimes black race-riots have a deeper motivation, as with BLM, but black youths do seem to possess a greater propensity towards purely recreational rioting than other races do. Why might this be? It could be something to do with black inner-city urban culture, with its nihilistic glorification of crime and gangs, and the chronic levels of black absent fatherhood, flaws the overall “black community” remain stubbornly unwilling to confront. I remember an old documentary presented by black “community leader” (or whining Left-wing loudmouth) Darcus Howe, where, reminded of his abandonment of his own children, he became angry and began ranting on camera about how “You always ask me ‘Where were black fathers when their children were being born?’ I ask you this instead: ‘Where were black mothers when their children were being born?’” A question to which he genuinely did not appear to know the answer.

Then again, it could be more a question of genetics. As Darcus Howe ably proved every time he opened his mouth, blacks do have lower average IQs, and apparently lower impulse control. So, it would stand to reason they may be more prone to riot purely for the mega-LOLs. It may be that, as in harsh Nigerian schools, the average black is just innately more likely to need keeping in line via strict external discipline than whites, browns, Jews, Hispanics, or yellows do. If so, this may mean they simply cannot, on a collective average basis, function properly in more lenient societies like our own, which are designed for the general use of white people, not outsiders like themselves. Footage of the Clapham mobs thus appears akin to footage of polar bears weirding out in the Sahara Desert; evidence of a species completely out of place, totally unable to function within the inappropriate new environment into which it has been artificially inserted.

Such possibilities are difficult for many observers to admit, though, so mainstream commentators tend to settle upon other, less inflammatory, “explanations” for such events instead: like the platitudinous idea that it is all due to a simple lack of nearby youth clubs.

Miah Excuses

As a university student, during the summer holidays I used to work in a youth club. The character of the children did not miraculously change once they passed the building’s entrance. Bad kids still remained bad. Two very bad children once attempted to burn the building down—with all the other good children still inside it. If Clapham high street had been paved full of youth clubs, from end to end, those rioting black kids would still have acted like little shits and been kicked out for smoking weed or stabbing all the normal attendees.

Left-wing academics like Lee Elliot Major, a “Professor of Social Mobility at the University of Exeter,” know better than racists like me do, however, telling Left-wing newspaper The Guardian that:

There’s nothing new about young people organizing mass meet-ups. What’s changed is the context. We’ve dismantled the physical spaces where young people used to gather safely: youth clubs, community centers, even affordable public venues. Digital platforms have taken their place, organizing gatherings at speed and scale. We often frame these moments as problems of behavior. But they are also symptoms of a deeper shift: a generation with fewer structured opportunities, fewer shared spaces, and more uncertainty about where they fit.

The best place these people would “fit” is in a prison cell, Black Hole of Calcutta-style. Even more eager to make excuses was Bilkis Miah, the Bangladeshi-British CEO of some kind of teen-facing NGO called You Be You, which isn’t very good advice to follow, if You Be Worthless.

You Be You swings into schools full of non-whites and tells them how amazing they all are, instead of whipping them like an African teacher would. When Miah saw the scenes in Clapham, she rushed onto her website to declare “This is not a race issue,” the precise reverse message she spouts about everything else at all other times. Bilkis was then allowed to expand upon what she euphemistically described as the “unrest in Clapham” in a rejigged guest column in The Times, the nation’s newspaper of broken record, where she put as positive a spin on the black chaos as possible. Far from being worthless, the young offenders’ looting and violence demonstrated great personal initiative, she said:

Young people organized themselves in Clapham, in large numbers, with energy and urgency. That is not a lack of capability. That is a lack of direction. That is what happens when we stop creating spaces that make young people feel like they matter.

Imagine if someone described all the equally admirably self-organized white mobs who tried to burn down Britain’s asylum hotels in 2024 in that utopian fashion. Miah went on to explain how, if every single child who went feral in Clapham didn’t get their own personal taxpayer-funded back-yard crazy golf course immediately, things would only get worse:

When you cut youth centres, defund after-school programmes, leave young people with nowhere to go and nothing to do, and then act shocked when they fill that vacuum themselves, you don’t get to be surprised. You get to be accountable.

When will people like you be held accountable instead, for completely ruining what used to be a nice, orderly country? This is the logic of the racial protection-racket, nothing more: Give us non-whites free stuff, or we’ll burn down all your nice white stuff that you actually earned and paid for. Bilkis’ quest to provide “anti-racism and wellbeing education in schools” (as in, classroom self-esteem therapy for shipped-in teenage thugs) was inspired by the fact that, when young, “I grew up in a society that wasn’t designed for people who looked like me, thought like me, or moved through the world like I did” by slithering. Yes, it’s almost like it isn’t your country and you don’t really belong here or something.

Accidentally, Bilkis Miah does indeed hit upon the very nub of the matter. People like her and the black Clapham chimp-out mob really are “living in a society that wasn’t designed for” people who look and act like them. Well, they know what the solution is, then, don’t they?