Counter-Currents
Donald Trump has expressed the desire to purchase Greenland or conquer it by force, deeming it “absolutely necessary” for America’s security. He also claimed he wanted to make Canada the 51st state and retake the Panama Canal. For the purposes of this article, I’ll ignore the Panama and Canada issue and focus on the Greenland adventure. To sum it up, American white advocates should not support this effort.
Subscribe here to keep reading
Don’t Join Trump’s Greenland Adventure
Don%E2%80%99t%20Join%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20Greenland%20Adventure%0A
Don%E2%80%99t%20Join%20Trump%E2%80%99s%20Greenland%20Adventure%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
January 6 Pardons and Political Realism
-
Emperor Trump, Part 2
-
Emperor Trump, Part 1
-
What White Nationalists Want from the Trump Administration Part 3
-
The End of American Democracy
-
America’s Thermidorian Reaction Part 2
-
Obama’s “Transformation” and the Coming Trump Dictatorship
-
On Tariffs, Visas, and the Indian Programming Scam
4 comments
I completely agree that annexing a territory peopled by a foreign race is a recipe for disaster. Your article reminded me of John C. Calhoun’s opposition to the invasion of Mexico. Here is the great Senator in 1848, protesting against the prospect of annexing Mexico:
However much we might rejoice at the courage, bravery and skill of our troops, and the astonishing victories they have achieved, he was yet sorry to confess that the government had lost that reputation for moderation and justice which had been its crowning attributes in its early days. If we shall attempt to hold Mexico as a province, or incorporate it into this Union, we shall find it utterly impracticable. We had never assimilated any of the Indian tribes with our people when incorporating ther territory into our Union. We have removed them farther away. We have never incorporated any people into this Union but the Caucasian race—the free white man; and shall we now corrupt this free white population by introducing into our confederation the Indians and the mixed races of Mexico? Our government is for the free white man.
It was true then and it is true now.
Whites should be studying Calhoun, not ‘the Bible’.
Canadian Prepper called it cannibalism – you can’t win against your enemies, so you’re going after your allies.
One could debate the “allies” part, of course; I think “vassals” is a better word. Either way, what is Denmark or even the EU going to do? Our dear Chancellor Scholz was mouthing off, as were other European politicians, but really – if the US does occupy Greenland, who is going to send in the army? Who is going to break off ties with the US? Right…
We really lost something when the Bible stopped being taught on a wide scale.
No, we didn’t. A bunch of jewish propaganda designed to make Whites believe in ‘universal brotherhood’ while the jews continue to practice race-war against Whites is not useful or valuable.
Aesop would be a much better text to teach to Whites than ‘the Bible’.
I also note that your example isn’t from the ‘White people’s part of the Bible’ (NT) but, instead, from the ‘jewish part of the Bible’ (OT).
If every story Whites use to defend themselves ends up being a jewish story, why do we need to be White? Why not just convert to being a jew and join the enemies of Whites directly?
I suspect it’s because, in the end, ‘christians’ are really needed to keep Whites on the Abrahamo-Platonic Plantation.
Which way White man?
Away. Just ‘away’.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.