What White Nationalists Want from the Trump Administration
Part 3

1,812 words

(Part 1. Part 2.)

Policy 6: Nationwide Election Reform

Republicans did better in states that enacted election reforms in the wake of 2020. Many asked why the Left didn’t steal the 2024 election. The answer is that they probably knew they couldn’t realistically commit enough fraud to win, due to election reform combined with Kamala’s low popularity (which they knew about from internal polls even as they raised hundreds of millions from donors to spend on her doomed campaign). For example, due to the lax election laws in Arizona, Kari Lake probably had the election stolen from her, as evidenced by how she “lost” despite gaining more votes than Kamala. This apparent discrepancy is logically explained by Lake’s election being stealable but not Trump’s.

Election laws in the US are a crazy patchwork due to federalism. Article 1 of the US Constitution grants the states the right to regulate the “times, places, and manner of holding elections,” but this is balanced by Congress’ right “at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.” The commonsense interpretation of this arrangement is that while states have the right and duty to carry out decentralized elections, that right/duty cannot contradict the federal government’s centralized vision of elections. The federal government would be acting in accordance with its explicit Article 1 powers and not contrary to states’ rights by insisting that state and local election laws meet certain minimum standards of integrity.

This is justified because election fraud in one state or district affects the nation as a whole. First, it can alter the balance of power in Congress. Secondly, even if election fraud doesn’t alter the outcome of an election, it can gaslight politicians and citizens into misjudging the popularity of various policies, thereby warping electoral mandates. Thirdly, it can change the limited resources which donors, parties, campaigns, and citizens divert to future elections. Fourth, it undermines the legitimacy of the system overall. Thus, the citizens of all states have a strong interest in nation-wide election integrity. Ron DeSantis’s reforms in Florida are a good model to copy at the federal level.

But forward-looking reform is not enough. Election riggers from 2020 must also be thoroughly prosecuted to deter future election fraud. Despite the supposedly vast power of the deep state, they still need pawns to do their dirty work. Election fraud is a crime, and one of the best ways to fight crime is to make sure it doesn’t pay. In fact, this is something we want the Left and the center Right to hysterically cry about. The louder their outrage, the louder the message that rigging can have consequences, even if it is years later. We want them to blast our message for us.

Prosecuting election fraud is necessary because that’s what a serious regime in a serious country would do. Failing to vigorously prosecute riggers will send a dangerous message that either the 2020 election wasn’t stolen, Team Trump isn’t serious, or that stealing elections is not serious. Anything less than January 6-style mass prosecutions will undermine the regime’s legitimacy at home and abroad—perhaps fatally. However, generous plea deals should be offered to low-level riggers who can implicate more people, especially if they are higher ranking.

Tying into foreign policy, foreign collusion should also be thoroughly investigated in both the 2020 and 2024 elections. Trump’s campaign lawyer sent a letter to the FEC alleging that the UK’s ruling Labor Party sent volunteers and advisors to the Kamala campaign. The basis for this allegation was a now-deleted LinkedIn post by the head of operations of the Labor Party, Sofia Patel, which stated that almost a hundred people from Labor would be travelling to the US. While foreign volunteers can work in US elections, they must do so for free to avoid violating the rule against financial contributions. But Patel’s statement that “we will sort your housing” strongly suggests financial aid from Labor.

The rule that foreign volunteers are fine so long as there is no financial contribution does not accurately reflect the reality that volunteers can be compensated under the table or through promotions and raises. A quid pro quo need not be spoken to be real. Thus, a wise and defensible election reform would be outright banning foreigners from volunteering in US elections as “boots on the ground,” or at the very least requiring them to register to illuminate the true extent of the problem and that it is almost entirely Left-leaning.

Policy 7: Abolish or Curtail Federal Agencies

One of the issues on which White Nationalists have the most common ground with MAGA Republicans is the need to abolish or curtail federal alphabet agencies. For us, such agencies have a well-established pattern of being anti-white. Chief of these is the FBI, which partners with the ADL to target white dissidents.

Sadly, most conservatives primarily care about free enterprise and taxes. But those are sufficient reasons to want to cut the federal bureaucracy, which inflicts onerous regulations and costs enormous sums of money.  As I argue here for the Homeland Institute, federal funding is a myth anyway. The states can spend their money better than the federal government.

The FBI and Department of Education are best abolished outright. The few useful things the FBI does can be outsourced to the US Marshalls.

Budgets can also be slashed by reducing salaries and the number of employees. For example, the Holman rule can be used to reduce federal salaries to $1. This is an archaic rule that would undoubtedly be subject to litigation, but even if bureaucrats were to eventually prevail in court, only the most zealous of regime creatures would work on a volunteer basis in the meantime. Putting problem departments under the “boss from hell” may persuade many federal employees to quit voluntarily. In fact, some, most notably in the DOJ, are already promising to do just that.

Simply splitting up the federal agencies geographically would do wonders too. DC and its suburbs are a cesspool of fakeness. Geographic proximity allows bureaucrats to develop a separate group consciousness and shamelessly network and collude against the rest of the country. DC is also an affluence bubble that shelters a swarm of petty tyrants from the consequences of their policies. It is one of the richest parts of the country that became rich from the tax dollars of the people they tyrannize.

Ideally, these agencies should be relocated to deep red areas and/or on the periphery so that they can boost those local economies but not risk changing electoral politics. Their employees should be herded into living with the people they rule so they can’t deny or insulate themselves from the consequences of their policies. This will also help with recruiting loyal and competent employees, because applicants will have to be willing to relocate to various corners of the empire, or even better, come from the local area. This also makes it harder to “fail up” because failed employees of ABC won’t be able to be rehired by their friend a block away over at XYZ. Moreover, in the case of a domestic contingency it will be easier to apply pressure if they are surrounded by Republicans.

A combination of relocating alphabet agencies and cutting budgets would devastate DC, ironically similar to what they did to Appalachia and Chicago. Firing a million federal employees would be terrible for their economy but great for everyone else’s. Maybe they can become professional leaf blowers after the mass deportations.

The alphabet agencies are unpopular, but before abolishing them, the new administration needs to carefully build a case with the public to increase support and decrease resistance for abolition.

First, Trump or Musk could use their private wealth to help North Carolina recover from hurricane Helene. This would garner public sympathy while humiliating FEMA for its incompetence and malice, and by extension all alphabet agencies.

Secondly, conduct mass prosecutions and investigations for anything and everything: conspiracy against rights for January 6, election rigging, foreign collusion, corruption, discrimination against whites, Christians, and Republicans, etc. Give them a taste of their own medicine by doing this January 6-style. It does not matter if any of these prosecutions hold up in court. The process is the punishment.

The point is to do what the FBI and DOJ did with J6: intimidate our enemies, but more importantly, fill criminal complaints with embarrassing information so that it becomes public record to build a narrative. For example, after raiding patriots, ransacking their houses, and seizing all electronic devices, the FBI would fill criminal complaints with “evidence” which may or may not have stood up to a motion ad limine, even in DC. This included things like legally owning guns and pocket constitutions. Many J6 complaints read more like a Huffington Post hit piece than legal documents, but that’s unsurprising given that journalists and FBI agents are spawned from the same midwit milieu.

What do you think we will find when we raid these people? BLM coffee mugs, donations to Democrats, woke literature, disparaging comments about whites, Christians, Republicans, and flyover country, connections to or outright membership in antifa, foreign espionage for Israel or China, drugs, child pornography: all of these things can be included in the public record.

Law enforcement types don’t have a pleasant time in prison, which gives us a lot of leverage to turn them into informants. Generic federal employees are bullies who like to dish punishment out but not take it. Many have addiction problems. Going through withdrawal while in custody can turn them into informants. But despite initial threats, we should be lenient in offering generous plea deals for informing on others. This is a standard threat and rescue tactic.

Our goal here is not winning individual cases in court, but irreparably smearing the federal government in the court of public opinion to justify their total annihilation. So long as their agencies are destroyed and they can never be employed again in state or federal government again, let the toadies fail up with book deals. That’s between them and George Soros with his dwindling financial resources.

Consider what we already know: the FBI’s pedophile scandals, FEMA’s response in North Carolina, or the US Secret Service agent outed by the Justice Report as antifa and a self-proclaimed “anarcho-communist.” Imagine, then, what we will discover if we make systematic inquiries. This evidence can be used to explain to the general public what we already know: DC delenda est.

As with mass deportations, it is essential that the bureaucracy be tackled immediately, because there will be some short-term pain for long-term gains, and we want to see some of those gains before 2028.

I must emphasize that dismantling the federal bureaucracy must be complete, ruthless, and thorough. For as Machiavelli observed, “Men should be either treated generously or destroyed, because they take revenge for slight injuries — for heavy ones they cannot.”