1,390 words
Pearl Davis is one of the more interesting influencers on the Internet. I consider her a men’s rights advocate almost in the same way that Jared Taylor (or perhaps more accurately Jesse Lee Peterson) is an advocate for white people. Thick-skinned, smart, seemingly unflappable, she really likes to dish it out on what she calls “modern women”—especially when it comes to marriage and relationships (and apparently ruining New York City). She’s well researched, well-spoken, and seemingly comfortable in any corner of the Right where people are comfortable with free speech. My two favorite long interviews of hers are with MMA fighter Sean Strickland and comedian Leonarda Jonie. (Greg Johnson also had an excellent interview with Jonie here.) What makes Pearl so engaging, in my opinion, is that she’s wise to what she doesn’t know and fearlessly grants other people leeway in any wheelhouse that isn’t hers—and this includes politics, race, and “the Jays” (her term for our friends in the little hats).
But venturing into her wheelhouse can be a bit dangerous if she smells you “simping” or “white-knighting” for women. For example, here is Pearl digging hard into Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire over a video Walsh posted two years ago bashing Pearl for dissuading men from getting married. In Pearl’s defense, it seems that she’s not so much anti-marriage as she’s in favor of reforming anti-male divorce laws before advising young men to tie the knot. I’m extremely sympathetic to Walsh’s pro-marriage agenda, but what Pearl proposes is not unreasonable.
Pearl must be having Daily Wire on the brain however since she recently posted a video which struck hard at Ben Shapiro, who is, of course, one of the founders of the Daily Wire. The title: “Ben Shapiro is More Triggered Than Modern Women.” (The ultimate insult coming from Pearl.) At issue is Shapiro’s shameful avoidance of Nick Fuentes after Tucker Carlson hosted the oft-denounced, formerly-radioactive right-wing influencer on his program—something that Pearl did two years ago, for which she was summarily cancelled. Shapiro would rather run his mouth about Fuentes than actually sit down and debate him. Pearl finds this frustrating, baffling, and unbefitting a man.
And I was listening to Ben Shapiro on Triggernometry and his arguments are saying, “Oh, we can’t we can’t platform these type of people. I shouldn’t have to respond to this kind of thing.” And I’m like, Ben, again, what have we been giving you our money for? You know, Nick F. has a very big audience. Now, Ben Shapiro on this Triggernometry podcast is trying to pretend he doesn’t, but every guy that I know that’s a white male under the age of 25, most of them have at least heard of Nick F. And even the young women know who he is.
So Ben Shapiro keeps trying to come back and say, “Oh, he’s not that big. He’s not that big,” as he gets bigger every year. And so, you know, Ben Shapiro, if you disagree with Nick’s ideology—I don’t have an opinion either way on the foreign policy stuff, but as somebody that’s watched the Daily Wire for a long time, I’ve paid for like the Daily Wire Plus—I just want to know, like, what are we giving you our money for? You’re insinuating that people are too dumb to be able to sift through ideas that make sense and don’t make sense. Women are probably too dumb. That’s true. But men, in my opinion, have a gift from God. Especially white men have a gift from God to be able to reason and to be able to logic. I mean, there’s a reason they invented 90% of the world’s stuff. And a lot of conservative media is white conservative men. They could hear a debate between Ben Shapiro and Nick Fuentes and decide for themselves what makes sense and what doesn’t make sense.
Pearl goes on to urge Shapiro to put up or shut up about Fuentes. “Make him look stupid. That’s your job,” she says. And she doesn’t seem to care about who would win the debate; she’s not taking sides. Rather, she supports the principle of free speech and is calling out the hypocrisy of people like Shapiro who claim to support free speech but “think that they have the right to dictate who you can and can’t listen to.”
Amen.
My issue with Pearl on this particular topic is not that she’s wrong, she’s just trying to wring water from a stone. This is where being versed on the Jewish Question actually becomes useful since it would prevent Pearl from wasting her time, energy, and expectations on someone like Ben Shapiro.
Shapiro is a self-identifying Jew who supports identity politics for Jews and opposes it for everyone else. He’ll call white gentiles racist when they tell the truth about blacks, yet will say some of the most dismissively racist things about the Palestinians. He is essentially an Israeli patriot pretending to be an American patriot—in so many words, a shape-shifting grifter. Mark Dice, thankfully, has all the receipts on Shapiro. People on the Right have been complaining about this sort of behavior from Jews for decades. Pat Buchanan, Russell Kirk, and Joe Sobran are great examples. What makes Shapiro somewhat unique is that he’s coming from the conservative Right rather than the Left like most Jews—think a younger, hipper version of Marc Levin.
But this does not mean that Shapiro’s conservative, right-wing bona fides are genuine—they aren’t. He will promote conservatism and free speech as long as it does not adversely impact the Jewish diaspora or Israel. As soon as it does, he (along with Levin and a whole host of others) will abandon conservatism and free speech and behave no differently than the authoritarian Left. This is what Pearl is observing in Shapiro’s behavior today. Rather than debate Fuentes, he’d rather cast him out of respectable conservatism, just like Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter did to Buchanan, Kirk, and Sobran in the 1980s and 1990s. Furthermore, Shapiro and Levin would like to cast Tucker Carlson out as well simply because he gave oxygen to Fuentes’s perspective and humanized him in their discussion.
Pearl implies that Ben Shapiro is not man enough to debate Nick Fuentes, as if he’s afraid he would lose. I disagree. In a debate with Fuentes, I’m sure Shapiro would do just fine, perhaps even well. Pearl’s mistake, in my opinion, is to assume a certain amount of good faith in Shapiro—as if he cares about the truth more than he cares about Jewish power. Assuming this latter position, everything about Shapiro not only makes sense but is predictable. He avoids Fuentes because he fears (quite neurotically) that regardless of who wins the debate, granting him an audience would at best expose Jewish misdeeds to a broader public. At worst, it would lead straight to Auschwitz. In the first case, he’d rather hide Jewish misdeeds than expose and correct them. And in the second, he’d simply assume all white gentiles are potentially genocidal. This is a stereotypical Jewish anti-whiteism, and it is a reason why gentiles eventually get fed up with Jews. There is plenty of scholarship to back this up.
Due to his overt ethnocentrism, Ben Shapiro is not to be trusted, and it does not matter if he says the right things about abortion, gun rights, or social security. Just like a long line of influential Jews who came before him, he’s hitting for another team, and he won’t think twice about hitting against white gentiles if he feels he needs to (even if in reality he doesn’t). Yes, there are a small number of Jews who have bucked this trend, such as Murray Rothbard, Paul Gottfried and Stephen Miller, and yes, there are white gentiles who’ve done so as well, such as William F. Buckley, Glenn Beck, and until 2024, Charlie Kirk. Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes have given Ben Shapiro the opportunity buck this trend, and he hasn’t taken it. Thus we can only assume that he has chosen to revert to type and stick up for his own kind rather than the truth.
Knowing this, there should never be any question as to why Ben Shapiro won’t debate Nick Fuentes. He’s a Jew, Pearl. He never will.
22 comments
Great article, never heard of Pearl Davis, but she sounds interesting. 🙃
Pearl Davis is a pretty solid coalburner, and has only ever dated blacks. A lot of her commentary on men’s rights is likely due to her seeing the absolute dysfunction of the black community in regards to gender. Roger Devlin, who you have writing here for counter-currents, speaks up about that issue a bit, and has written about how the gender problems are worse for blacks than they are for whites. I keep some tabs on the black ethno-nationalist communities and they praise Pearl Davis for speaking up in favor of men’s issues.
It was quite funny that after Sarah Stock’s marriage announcement, Pearl Davis tried throwing some slander, and immediately all the other trad-right grifter girls piled on her for miscegenation. Talking about it as if it was an absolutely defiling thing. You would never have seen that ten years ago, even the alt-right frogposters canceling Lauren Southern for miscegenation had to keep that seetheposting to imageboards. It’s a sign how far the needle has shifted, women are actually holding other women accountable for racemixing now.
As for Ben Shapiro defeating Nick Fuentes in a debate. I think you’re right, Ben Shapiro is more intelligent. But I don’t even think they would actually debate as much as they’d try to goad each other, and one is more likely to lose his cool than the other. Ben Shapiro is a walking stereotype of a hysterical jew and could easily be baited into a meltdown after a few sensitive buttons have been pressed, and Nick Fuentes has spent 8 years brooding over the fantasy of being able to press Ben Shapiro’s buttons.
It is defiling, and a major fault. I have to wonder what went wrong in her life – too much television? The only way back from something like this is 1) don’t do that ever again, and 2) sincere repentance.
“what went wrong in her life –”
She lacked good & responsible parents .
Of course, it goes without saying that it is defiling.
But the point was more that the overton window has shifted so much that women are insulting and shaming one another for such behavior. For all the blackpilling we do, girls wouldn’t dare be overtly racialist on twitter ten years ago.
The trad-influencer to fox-news pipeline has been broken, that’s a huge part of it. Making it big used to mean getting a slot on a big network and appearing alongside Hannity, but that’s not special anymore. There’s a separate podcast circuit where they don’t get canceled for calling out jewish power or being “racist”, so they can let their true feelings. We have come a long way over the years in that respect.
Hopefully the general public gets the picture, and the sooner the better. Back in my younger days, we all knew that stuff just didn’t go.
Pearl Davis is a very ugly, very destructive person who cashes in on men’s resentments. Couldn’t be further from a constructive, idealistic man like Jared Taylor. She should not be endorsed.
People can evolve, so there’s a chance she learned her lesson. I just can’t imagine ever, ever, ever sleeping with a negro. It really makes me suspicious of anything she says unless she’s also willing to denounce that behavior. And to my knowledge, she hasn’t.
Pearl has a Black boyfriend (she calls him Dominican, as if that changes anything). I’m not taking advice from mudsharks – I find women like that very much repulsive.
I’m not a follower of Pearl’s, but nothing overt popped up that she’s dating yet another non-White. The black ‘influencer’ she famously dated in 2020, Oneya Johnson, known for his Angry Reactions TikTok videos, was arrested in Burbank, Calif. for domestic violence, per the New York Post, 2/18/2024.
I just read –she’s from a Catholic family?? I remember hearing that Pearl’s father had permitted Oneya Johnson to live in their home/garage. And theirs was a high-profile relationship. (Ironically, I once heard an American porn “actress” [filmed prostitute] comment that she’d never do interracial porn for any amount of $ because it would de-value her ‘career’ so much — the male stars in filmed sex-work wanted nothing to do with low-ranking White females who agreed to paid interracial performances.)
I can understand. I’d rather wife up a high-class hooker than the Kardashians.
Pearl Davis is exactly the dumb bimbo that our time needs.
Rollo Tomassi ripped on her for ages but what has Pearl above him? MOROSENESS!!!
She fails herself into the spotlight and that is what is needed in this day and age. People on here too often pose as if it’s still the 1970’s where intellectual debate takes place in a Parisian or Viennese Cafe with left wing intellectual giants debating Evola and FPJ. That is not where we’re at. We’re literally living idiocracy.
“…here is Pearl digging hard into Matt Walsh and the Daily Wire over a video Walsh posted two years ago bashing Pearl for dissuading men from getting married. In Pearl’s defense, it seems that she’s not so much anti-marriage as she’s in favor of reforming anti-male divorce laws before advising young men to tie the knot. I’m extremely sympathetic to Walsh’s pro-marriage agenda, but what Pearl proposes is not unreasonable.”
First things first, both Matt Walsh & Pearl are Catholic. (Serious Catholics are very Anti-divorce.) Matt is married & has six kids with his wife. And Pearl??
In general, Catholic women are particularly naive about how anti-male the entire divorce industry is because it doesn’t personally effect them or any serious Catholics they associate with. As a (raised Catholic) mom to 3 young men, all of whom attended church with their Protestant dad when they were <18 , & are now going Catholic in a BIG way, I’ve given lots of thought to marriage & the Catholic wives they’re likely to pick.
Personally, I think the point of marriage is to raise kids, & influence grandkids. When it comes to divorce & child custody law, I’ve seen one thing which had made a big & positive difference: As some state laws have changed to give divorcing parents 50-50 child custody, the numbers of divorces have plummeted. I’ve also seen arrangements where young men pre-marriage decide not to keep assets in their own name (using trusts, etc.) & this diminishes divorce filings, since there’s no big financial payout incentives for an ex-spouse.
“Knowing this, there should never be any question as to why Ben Shapiro won’t debate Nick Fuentes.”
Without commenting anything about Nick’s lifestyle choices, or lack of integrity, at some point, he will have to address: Do I stay with multi-racial Roman Catholicism or do I aim for a White-run, White American nation? There’s no having both. But until that realization dawns on rest of the nation, Nick, I suspect, would like to strive for Charlie Kirk level, big-tent popularity.
In recent conversation he’s tried to expand White American nationalism to include anchor babies. When he was recently challenged over his expanded support for “anchor-baby nationalism” he was not prepared, & just lashed out in the same typical style that both Jews, & Jew-ish commenters, do: I won’t dignify/clarify that! I’m done with you. [<– paraphrased]
I disagree that Shapiro could do well in a debate with Fuentes. That’s not a commentary on Fuentes’ debating skills. The problem Shapiro would encounter is that America’s degree of support for Israel is simply indefensible from any pro American perspective. The only way you can argue for it is by saying Jews are superior to other people and deserve special protection, which is the argument made by all Zionists, regardless of if they’re Jewish or Christian.
Pearl Davis is a purveyor of pornography for right wing men. She’s disgusting.
Also, her boyfriend is black. Or do I repeat myself?
The race-mixing Pearl strumpet allegedly said:
… Especially white [sic] men have a gift from God to be able to reason and to be able to logic. I mean, there’s a reason they invented 90% of the world’s stuff. And a lot of conservative media is [sic] white [sic] conservative men. They could hear a debate between Ben Shapiro and Nick Fuentes and decide for themselves what makes sense and what doesn’t make sense…
Good grief! See Greg Johnson’s essay from 15 years ago, “Why Conservatives STILL Can’t Win” here on Counter-Currents.
Why would any serious White preservationist care what this “expert” has to say beyond the fact that White men have been the most inventive in recorded history? We’ve known that without her reminding us. Who gives a shit what either the Jew Shapiro or the nutcase Fuentes have to say? She and they having any voice in the White preservation cause is a problem of popular social media.
Mention of Leonarda Jonie reminded me of her comedic speech at the AmRen conference Friday evening. Her funniest line to me was when she was relating to the gathering the exact moment she realized she was a WN: during a nightmare in which she had a baby fathered by a nigger. When handed her newborn to breastfeed, she exclaimed to herself, “I cannot put my tit in this little nigger’s mouth.” That’s funny, but only to a rare, racially conscious White audience.
Pearl Davis and Leonarda Jonie singing together at the piano is hilarious. Pearl’s Youtube channel, about 1 hr 35mn in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKBGb3NatOE
Doug Harrison: November 18, 2025 Pearl Davis and Leonarda Jonie singing together at the piano is hilarious. Pearl’s Youtube channel, about 1 hr 35mn in:…
—
Is this the best a supposedly pro-White movement has to offer, two fairly physically attractive, race-mixing white females yucking it up together for an hour and a half on Jew-owned YouTube? So much for social media.
Will, thank you for your comment.
I think the video serves the purpose of loosening restraints on speech, White people breaking our stupid taboo against honest discussion of race.
Here’s hoping Leonarda will strengthen and ecourage White women like Pearl Davis to drop the negrolatry.
Doug Harrison: November 27, 2025 Will, thank you for your comment. I think the video serves the purpose of loosening restraints on speech, White people breaking our stupid taboo against honest discussion of race. Here’s hoping Leonarda will strengthen and ecourage White women like Pearl Davis to drop the negrolatry.
—
You’re welcome, Doug. I didn’t watch the video long enough to see if in their 90-minute yuckfest either of the former paramours of Black men had sent a strong message to other White females about their depravities against their race and Nature’s highest law.
I know too many traditional White women who would be disgusted by these two’s video, if knowing their history, and who could have sent out a much more positive message: never have an intimate relationship with a non-White male.
Luckily, neither had nigger babies so are unburdened by having non-White dependents. They can be fully rehabilitated from their past regretful transgressions. I caught Miss Leonarda’s comedy routine at the AmRen thing Friday evening, but she didn’t stick around afterward. She’s way too Christian for my tastes but had some lines about niggers that were refreshing.
I have one thing to say about her: actions speak louder than words. That is, what people do is a better indicator of their true character than what they say. Period. Done. I have no respect for her.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.