Part 1 of 3 (Part 2 here)
Harold Armstead Covington (1953-2018), to paraphrase Franklin Roosevelt’s mellifluous rhetoric regarding Pearl Harbor, is a man of infamy. A White Nationalist extraordinaire, National Socialist (as Harold once told me, he was no “neo-Nazi”; he was an old-school Sturmer), and enemy of the Jew and his hangers-on, Harold was as much an enemy to White Nationalism, judging by the vitriol poured on him by the National Alliance, VNN, and several other White Nationalist institutions — and I’m certain a few here at Counter-Currents as well.
I’m not going to talk about that Harold. Instead, I’ll focus on Harold Covington the writer. His notoriety rests on his Northwest novels, a series of five books dealing with his — as well as that of many others in the White Nationalist community — dream of a separate white homeland. But he offered a diverse oeuvre of other works that are quite equal to the Northwest novels.
I first came to know about Harold in 2005, when I heard of a book called The Hill of the Ravens (THOR), the first of his Northwest novels. I had been writing a White Nationalist novel of my own for some years before that, Man and Nation. Reading THOR, I finally abandoned my work, realizing Harold was doing it far better than I was. I read a number of his other novels, was impressed, and wrote Harold to inquire about them. He gladly sent me copies of two of them, replying on March 18 in a very attractive cursive:
Dear Mr. Clark:
I deeply appreciate your periodic review of my fiction. I am sorry I’m unable to provide you with any more copies of my various books, but the fact is I am just plain, flat broke and these things are almost as difficult as medieval incubuses to bring into being.
88! Harold A. Covington
Harold grew up in Burlington, North Carolina in a semi-upper class family, at least by Tarheel standards, but his childhood was troubled. His father was abusive and unstable. Harold learned to maneuver around him, and his brother had his own emotional difficulties. He was stern about not wanting to dwell on his childhood, however, saying that he’d spent the previous three decades trying to forget it, so much so that he scorned the idea of writing memoirs: “I have no intention of going back there and wallowing in the mud for the titillation of Morris Dees, armchair Jewish psychologists, and other such slimy voyeurs . . . So there will be no My Life In A Looney Bin by Harold A. Covington.”
Harold enjoyed fantasy and writing from an early age. In a 2010 interview in the Historical Review Press, Harold recalled his father’s cardboard cartons of old sci-fi novels, pulp fiction which he devoured, with all the greats: Robert A. Heinlein, Brian Aldiss, Phillip K. Dick. Harold read them in bulk. At 14 he discovered H. P. Lovecraft; “love at first sight” was how he described it, and Harold always carried the three-volume Arkham House set of Lovecraft’s works wherever he went.
He wrote his first short story when he was 11. It was rejected by an editor when he was 12 — a Jewish editor. As Harold described it in A Revolution in Fiction:
The short story in question was a very bad H. P. Lovecraft knock-off. Okay, I have to admit that there are few things more ridiculous than an eleven year-old trying to write like a 19th century Victorian . . . the Jew in question was one Mrs. Feldman, who was “adviser” to the junior high school newspaper. She said my story was too long to publish in a sheet mimeographed on construction paper (well, fair enough, it was) but she also accused me of being “pretentious.”
Why? How can an eleven-year-old be pretentious? . . . I don’t think it was some big kosher conspiracy to deny publication to my childish Lovecraft pastiche. I think she did it by simple Hebraic instinct. It’s just what Jews do, like baby alligators seek water when they hatch.
After trying to get involved in theater, which he found too full of experimentalism and free-form, Harold went back to fiction and, at 16, wrote The Rose of Honor, his first novel. Yes, it was rejected by another Jew, a literary agent who claimed Harold had a chip on his shoulder. Harold had one anti-Semitic reference in the novel, which is set during the War of the Roses in the fifteenth century — although his reference was historically accurate. As Harold described it:
I wasn’t even an anti-Semite when I wrote the book, I was a teenaged kid with a Byron complex projecting his own mixed-up adolescent experiences onto a historical fictional backdrop, convinced I was doing the most clever and original thing in the world. My guess is that Fierst (The agent) picked up on little things in the book that even I didn’t know or understand myself. He instinctively understood that here was a goy mind that was not under control and he’d better stomp on it. Again, that irresistible Jewish urge to denigrate, to disrespect, to insult.
Harold admitted that a crucial part of his maturation was the integration of his school in Chapel Hill, with the resultant racial strife that forever influenced his views of blacks. It was, he said, his first view of racial reality, having to deal with blacks flashing knives. Harold refused to divulge what happened, but wrote that “on the day I finally left there, I looked back and made a silent personal vow that I would devote my life somehow to making sure that no young white person ever again had to go through what I went through in that place.
Another view of Harold’s racial education came in a very denunciatory interview that Harold’s brother gave to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) newsletter, recalling that Harold had in fact, been insulting black students, and had been cornered by a gang of them. They harassed him and he fell to his knees, beginning to be left alone. When he appealed to the Principal, the man took the side of the blacks, and said Harold had it coming. (We should bear in mind that Harold described his brother as having mental problems, and the SPLC is, at the very least, a highly prejudicial organization that has been found guilty of laundering money for Left-wing groups.)
By his own account, once he finished school Harold was kicked out of the house by his father and he joined the US Army, receiving infantry and Ranger training. While in the Army, Harold widened his reading to include such books as The Order of the Death’s Head by Heinz Höhne, a reasonably objective history of the SS. It influenced Harold to join George Lincoln Rockwell’s National Socialist White People’s Party (NSWPP). Stationed in Hawaii, Harold formed a local serviceman’s branch and ended up getting discharged early under honorable conditions.
After working with the NSWPP staff, Harold went to South Africa to work for a construction company, and then joined the army of Rhodesia, which was then under attack for its white-controlled government. Deported from there in 1976, Harold wandered from England to Ireland, and then back to America. He says he was always writing:
More than once I have tromped through Heathrow airport in London, or the ferry terminal at Dun Laoghaire, or Jan Smuts International in Johannesburg, or elsewhere, staggering out into the early morning of a foreign country with no place to go, lugging a suitcase that weighed about 60 pounds containing a dozen typed manuscripts and bits and pieces of manuscripts, a Sears portable manual typewriter, and a few changes of socks and underwear — all my worldly possessions along with the clothes I had on my back.
Nevertheless, Harold admitted he was a hack: “Charles Dickens I ain’t. Ernest Hemingway I ain’t. Robert A. Heinlein, not by a long shot.”
He ruminated that all of his wandering and involvement in White Nationalism kept him from getting down to working on his fiction and, as he put it, fleshing out his works more properly. Nevertheless, he left behind a good body of fiction — his original decompositions, as he put it: ten novels and a volume of short stories.
Harold’s fiction was a mix of the usual genres of murder mystery, action-adventure, and forays into the supernatural, the latter no doubt being the result of H. P. Lovecraft’s influence, but offering Harold’s own unique interpretations. The SPLC described Harold as an “occult” novelist, but this is too narrow and is meant to be derogatory. Harold remained unpublished for much of his life in part due to the demands of his activism, but also because of his inability to find a publisher, as he recalled in A Revolution in Fiction. He later praised the rise of print-on-demand self-publishing via the internet. It was, Harold observed, a great way to break the domination of the Jew-controlled publishing houses.
The Rose of Honor, his youthful first novel, was a medieval swashbuckler that had been revised from an earlier draft. In its pages Harold begins a lifelong chronicle of the Redmond family, whose members appear in his works across the centuries. Fascinated by the medieval period, Harold went on to write The Black Flame, a murder mystery pitting Sir Thomas Clave against witches, corrupt clergymen, and a demon. Harold described this work as “lots of gratuitous violence and perverted sex, sword fights, torture, looting and pillaging, strong White men, beautiful and evil White women, and general swashbuckling.” It is, however, very historically accurate, and Clave is a dynamic hero, ready to take on all to get to the truth. As Harold recounts, it sent Morris Dees into conniptions.
Harold moved on to Vindictus, which is set in the seventeenth century and depicts the first true gunfighter in Cromwell’s England. Denzil Redmond returns after fighting for King Charles’ army, unwilling to accept the Puritan edict that had led to his property being taken over by the state. Is it, as a reviewer put it on Amazon, an evil Three Musketeers? It is violent and nasty, but again, Harold’s depiction of the times is realistic, and Redmond is a cunning and courtly foe, ready to even up the score over the indignity his estate suffered from Puritanism’s presumed righteous mendacity.
While the story’s revenge story has a brutality that may cause some readers to blanch, Harold offers a softer, compassionate side of the character when Redmond winds up in Ireland during the gruesome Cromwellian excesses and saves Mary, an Irish woman from rape and death, and then makes her his wife. The story of Redmond and Mary is that of a war-weary man seeking redemption, demonstrating a continual theme through all of Covington’s fiction:a man seeking justice for a lost woman, even unto death. There is a binding, spiritual union between the sexes that is a constant leitmotif in his works. One wonders if it is a reflection of literary styles he admired, or perhaps a way of compensating for the death of his first wife, who had died in Rhodesia. Again, Harold chose silence on this issue.
Denzil and Mary’s struggle to overcome savagery and double-dealing and continue as a loyal couple adds a great deal of moral strength to the story, and belies Covington’s own notion that he was merely a hack. One feels a genuine pain requiring catharsis in his life. In the end, when Denzil deals with Kate, one of the last Puritans he takes vengeance on, he counters her charges that he is a madman by saying that, on the contrary, he is merely persistent in his methodical destruction of her usurping family. Satisfied at last, Denzil leaves for America to begin a new life and continue the Redmond family’s adventures in the new world.
Harold was especially amused by a feminist editor who accused him of having “a cavalier attitude towards women” in his works. Since Denzil was a cavalier, her rage was ludicrous. There is another example of this is in Other Voices, Darker Rooms, his volume of collected short stories. Most are supernatural. Some Harold’s of earliest work is here, where he begins with Lovecraft imitations but quickly develops his own voice. “Bringing Mary Home” is a third Matt Redmond story where he teams up with Irish detective Donovan to look for a killer and silence the sadness of a murdered girl. His story “Whisper Her Name on the Wind” deals with Beit Efrat, a Jewish community in Napoleonic Russia that must decide how to deal with Barmine, a ruthless Cossack officer who demands they return gold stolen from the Czar. It is also about how Hadass, one of the women , becomes involved in a gritty way to assert her independence in the avaricious and stratified Jewish world she grew up in. It was, Harold explained, the fruit of his lifelong ambition to deconstruct and lampoon Fiddler on the Roof, ending in an appropriately grim form of justice via the slow hiss of drawn sabers in a bleak Russian winter.
The pride of this collection is “The Madman and Marina,” which deals with Ivan Vasilievitch Yesenin, a state-sponsored killer in Stalin’s Soviet Union who is haunted by Marina, a woman he killed, and is compelled to find justice for her by searching out those whom she had lived around. The story features her ghostly voice while capturing a quick sketch of Soviet society, as well as an almost endearing miniature portrait of Stalin, the Father of the Peoples. Stalin observes that an interesting man is more appealing to him than a useful one — and thus Yesenin survives. Harold called this one his best work of fiction. He was honored when a Russian reader from St. Petersburg wrote to say that he had initially thought Harold was a Russian, as it was so authentic in depicting the people and period.
It’s likewise very intriguing that Ellen Sturgis Hooper, the Transcendentalist poet, provided Harold with one of her most inspirational lines:
I slept, and dreamed that life was beauty.
I woke, and found that life was duty.
This appeared in Other Voices, Darker Rooms, and Harold referred to it many times in his rallying cry to join the White Nationalist movement. The rest of the poem is equally a touchstone to Harold’s spirit:
Was thy dream then a shadowy lie?
Toil on, sad heart, courageously,
And thou shalt find thy dream to be
A noonday light and truth to thee.
His fiction is suffused with a struggle involving both inner and social strife between what must be done and what one wants to do. There is little romance in his novels and stories, but always a sense of duty. The Covington hero always has a divided, unfinished task, almost always seeking justice or trying to save a lost woman. This is displayed most openly in Fire and Rain, the novel where Matt Redmond meets Heather Lindstrom, and they are drawn together to become a detective team. There is a happy meeting, as Matt needs Heather to solve an unsolved murder from the radical circles of the 1960s. Matt, in his fedora and pipe, is an investigator for the North Carolina State Police and is a stand-in for Harold.
Heather gladly joins him in casting out her middle-of-the-road politics and helping to track down those Leftist radicals who had played a part in the gruesome murder of two girls. As Harold described it:
. . . It has a lot of anti-lefty stuff and some anti-Jew for those who can read between the lines. This one seems popular with older coots like myself who remember all that hippy-dippy crap in the Sixties. This one has some gruesome murders, some raunchy sex in by way of ‘commercial dirt,’ and a ghost.
He claimed he had created some black characters to help give agents the slip by demonstrating approved social behavior, but they are nevertheless well-drawn minor characters and help illustrate the locale and period. The ghost of one of the girl is the lost woman Harold always has in his works, and his way of involving her in the case is ingenious and never dull. There are also Russian agents, but they are hardly the usual Cold War types. Indeed, Harold’s foreigners are never stereotypical, but rather are well-rounded characters.
Harold’s spiritual and cosmological views are strongly on display here as the search for the murderer becomes a struggle against a greater, historical evil. As Matt explains:
But I’ve become convinced down through the years there’s kind of a pendulum swing of history between good and evil, and that whether we like it or not, we are living in one of those epochs which sees the near triumph of evil, a new Dark Age.
One of the villains of the story reveals a coldness infected by ideology when she reminds Heather that Lenin defined death as the permanent cessation of political activity, nothing more and nothing less.
Harold admitted that he doesn’t like to let go of his characters, and his theme of taking on liberal policies and acolytes was pursued in his second Matt and Heather novel, Slow Coming Dark. Matt’s nemesis here is the Clintons, and as Harold said, this book is a must for all Clinton-haters. He received a lot of praise from the Right, but also some criticism for his foul-mouthed Italian mobsters. One of Harold’s rules of writing was complete realism no matter what, and he claimed that this was simply the way real mobsters talk. It’s intriguing that in the book, Hilary emerges as both the brains and chief villainess of the duo from Arkansas, while Bill Clinton is a barely coherent druggie.
An even better sinister female nemesis appears in Bonnie Blue Murder, a murder mystery set in Charleston, South Carolina just after Fort Sumter has been fired upon at the start of the Civil War. Captain James Redmond, one of the Redmond clan’s Irish kin, is prevented from leading his regiment north to take on Lincoln’s army until the murder of a Confederate officer can be accounted for. This means following a wild, intricate trail involving the privileged and wealthy Jewish community, missing documents that jeopardize the Confederacy, and the need to clear a Jew who has joined the volunteers and has been accused of murder. Redmond must solve the murder after teaming up with the worldly Hugo Legare, a police inspector. Naomi Mendoza, the beautiful and much-desired belle of a Jewish community engaged in a deep cultural war, thwarts and entices Redmond at every turn, and the story is a delightful escapade through antebellum Charleston. Harold said of this work:
It said some very unkind things things about the the Chosen Ones. I was actually offered establishment publication if I would remove all Jewish references, which I declined to do.
He actually had a literary agent who was very keen on selling the book and tried to market it because he liked the Civil War detective mystery, but Harold said of it:
After a year he came back and reported failure. It wasn’t even the Jew thing, according to him. None of the readers or editors he tried to push my novel to even let him get that far. The problem with Bonnie Blue Flag was that no one in the Establishment publishing was even willing to consider a novel with a Confederate hero.
Harold said that the book is cerebral and written in a Victorian style, but it is nevertheless stylish and paints scenes of an antebellum Charleston that, Redmond admits to himself, was alrdoomed at the time.
Harold’s spiritual ideas were most fully realized in The Stars In Their Path, a novel dealing with reincarnation. When I bought a copy from Harold, he inscribed it thusly:
To Steven Clark,
Job 14:14 (look it up)
88! Harold A. Covington
The verse is: “If a man die, shall he live again? All the days of my appointed time will I wait, till my change come.”
In this book Covington depicts a couple throughout history who are continuously reborn and must connect with each other, but fail to — yet in their most recent incarnation it is vital they do so to save humanity. It is a story of love through the ages, but love for a moral purpose rather than mere sentimentality or personal satisfaction. He uses a variety of styles to great effect, starting in 1572 France just before the massacre of the Huguenots. In The Devil’s Work, he depicts a witchcraft trial in 1692 Massachusetts that includes a stern courtroom testimony recalling John Fowles’s 1985 novel A Maggot. In Her Name Was Julie Ann he imitates an Appalachian ballad, slips in an 1889 Wild West tone for Laughing Jack, and concludes with Her Best and Strongest Friend in 2001 Seattle, where Sam and Margarita, the present incarnation of the lovers, must come to terms. The series is always full of twists and surprises, and I’m in awe of Harold’s ability to set historical scenes.
Sam must exchange Margarita’s affection for that of a dangerous, inevitably diabolical man, but as Nostradamus, a kind of spirit guide, tells Sam, Margarita’s failures in the past have much to do with her judgements: “Women may admire courage, but it is the rare woman indeed in whom courage can prevail over charm.” Sam, the usual gruff and plainspoken Covington hero, must ensure that Margarita makes the right decision or else humanity will suffer.
Harold sad that “[m]y personal pick for the best novel I’ve ever done and book that ranks neck in neck for The Madman and Marina.” Harold admitted that it has been described as his “chick book” in that it resembles romance fiction. This was another work Morris Dees slimed, incidentally.
In a 2009 interview in The Occidental Quarterly, Harold, in response to the interviewer saying that he regarded The Stars In Their Path as a metaphysical novel, shared his spiritual views:
I believe in reincarnation because I myself have witnessed and experienced events that indicate to me that it is at least part of the process that happens to the human soul or personality after death . . . we are meant to live our lives in this world, not the next. My metaphysical world view has provided me with one invaluable spiritual asset, in that I do not fear death, although admittedly any Islamic suicide bomber can say the same.
Harold produced two works that he ranked as lesser efforts. Revelation 9 was a haunted house story, admittedly a Stephen King knockoff. He said it was the only story he wrote featuring a female protagonist, and believed part of its failure was due to the fact that he doesn’t write female characters well. As I’ve demonstrated, Harold actually did very well with his female characters.
One of his later novels was The Renegade, written in Ireland and dealing with an Irish vampire. It reads like a novelistic retelling of his Redmond story, Bringing Mary Home. That being said, it has a strong, understated energy set in a well-drawn Irish setting and containing a sense of the land of a country that had an enormous influence on Covington, especially when he started to work on his Northwest novels.
Reincarnation and spiritual rejuvenation of the human spirit over time is a strong Covington characteristic. He applied it to race in a thoughtful, humane manner. Harold was a great believer in spiritual power; to deny this is a misjudgment. He once told me that he considered Hitler to be an avatar, and he consistently urged the White Nationalist movement to seek a spiritual sense of continuity while at the same time openly struggling for solid social dominance. His use of the “occult” is more thoughtful and ennobling than, say, that of Stephen King, who dwells upon terror and evil with little balance. King’s protagonists barely survive their struggle with the darkness; Harold’s characters generally become enlightened, hoping for a progression of their souls to the next stage of spiritual unity.
Despite the violence and rancor in his stories, they always end in a sense of calmness and cosmic unity. This spiritual unity was pressed into the cause of White Nationalism and was best fulfilled in his Northwest novels, which I will comment on in the subsequent parts of this essay.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
The%20Fiction%20of%20Harold%20Covington%2C%0APart%20One%0A
Share
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
Related
-
Политика ресентимента
-
A Farewell to Reason: Houellebecq’s Annihilation
-
Ike Is My Shepherd
-
The Great Lawfare Event of 1944
-
Remembering Frank Herbert: October 8, 1920–February 11, 1986
-
Tony Martin, Pan-African Hero
-
How Infiltrated Is Conservative Inc.?
-
Remembering Savitri Devi (September 30, 1905–October 22, 1982)
21 comments
Harold I recall mainly from that appearance on Tom Snyder’s Tomorrow show in mid-1977. “Being a Nazi is never having to say you’re sorry.”
Yok yok yok. Harold turned out to be much younger than I thought. This little bio fills in some details.
Anyone have his birth data? I know someone born on or around his stated birthdate, but I need location and time. It seems everyone in these things is a sun Virgo, but that means nothing to me.
Sadly, I can’t afford Paywall access but would like to comment on Covington. I stumbled across his name, from where I don’t recall, and discovered his series of books about the Northwest. The only one I have read in its entirety is A Distant Thunder which I found extremely entertaining with cause for wishful thinking. Since then I’ve come across much negativity about him which I find perplexing but don’t know enough about the man to either agree or disagree. If any readers can point to media that supports either opinion, I would appreciate it.
Come back to it in a month and it should be viewable by anyone. It should appear in the “paroled from the paywall” list.
I never knew HAC. However, I did note some of his activities online back in the day. I observed him behaving pretty divisively in his Usenet posts from around the late 1990s. Of course, there were others sniping back, which also could be construed as divisiveness. So I have no opinion about who was right, other than that he and his detractors were probably both wrong. I chalked it up to one more instance of us fighting ourselves more than we were fighting our enemies – unfortunately business as usual around then.
I don’t remember the particulars. I’m not sure if any of that is still accessible; DejaNews got chewed up and spat out by Big Tech after that. Perhaps the conclusion we can draw is that HAC was a better novelist than an activist.
Thank you, Beau, for your willingness to provide feedback to my question. I look forward to reading the articles, both 1 and 2, when they become available. I am amazed by the number of books Covington wrote and have downloaded a number of them. I do enjoy his writing style. Thanks, again, for your input.
Deb
You can find the Northwest Front online and listen to HAC’s radio broadcasts. This will, I think, give you a pretty good idea of why he rubbed some (many?) folks the wrong way. Coming out of the WN 1.0 milieu – specifically the National Alliance – HAC had no patience for anyone who wasn’t willing to go ‘all in’ on White Nationalism. He was the vanguardist’s vanguardist. The funny/sad thing is that HAC promoted migration by Whites to the Northwest and never really got the kind of traction he (and the Northwest Front) hoped for. Instead, the Northwest is being invaded by liberal Californians.
Thank you. A search for Northwest Front didn’t produce anything other than the usual ADL, SPLC BS but I did find a number of podcasts on Internet Archive which I downloaded. They podcasts show up under his name while a search for Northwest Front on IA turns up a message informing the searcher the item is not available (meaning not to the public). Much of previously available material is now classified as such on that website. Thanks, again, for your response to my request.
Deb
Go to Northwestfront.info.
Use swisscows for your search engine
Thanks, I will.
I should also mention that I have a theoretical objection to HAC’s Northwest Front doctrine. The idea is essentially that we’re screwed, and our only hope is to exile ourselves to America’s version of Siberia, abandoning the rest of the country. When the poop hits the fan one day, this landlocked, snow-covered redoubt with middling resources will secede and then we’ll start fighting back like an invincible horde of berserkers. It’s not just HAC; others have expressed similar thoughts all the way back to Ayn Rand.
The problem with Generalplan Ostrich (as I put it) is that White flight has been the default strategy since the late 1950s, and where has it gotten us? Time to try something new! Community outreach is hard work, but it’s better than running away. It’s quite odd that HAC began by defending Rhodesia, literally one of the front lines of the White world at the time, then later on advocated total retreat.
Pretty funny there, but I still disagree (and I’ve never read Covington; maybe I will at some point). The idea of secession is finally gaining normiecon traction; I hear it constantly from semi-based GOP friends. Granted, this is Red State secession, but tell me it wouldn’t be easier to go from Red State secession to Ethnostate, than directly from Amerikwa to Ethnostate? I highly recommend prowhite physical ingathering as something (not the only thing!) proactive we can do in the pre-Ethnostate decades. Indeed, if prowhites don’t ingather, how precisely will the Ethnostate arise? And if nothing else, my friends in Red States have much nicer lives than I and other friends trapped in Blue States (I’ll admit this is partly because, after from my prowhiteness, I’m a fairly standard normiecon myself, except on abortion).
The subject is worth a long discussion, but I’m pretty tired presently. To summarize, when faced with the following two choices:
A) Move to the northern tip of Idaho, freeze my britches off while America goes to hell, hide out in a bunker until Doomsday, and then finally I’ll get off my big duff and heroically take the world by storm, or
B) Stay right where I am and do what I can to wake up the public in the most efficient and constructive manner as my evil mind can devise,
…then I’ll choose option B. Anyway, if the country does break up in the future, it will be remarkably better (for several reasons) if the coastal leftists are the ones to secede rather than us. FWIW, I’m not against planned communities as such, but I am against putting all our eggs into one basket.
Thank you for this initial review of HAC’s oervre. Like many self-made authors who largely worked without support, it seems like HAC underestimated the quality of his work.
Sigh.
Harold Covington was our best writer and a damn good teacher, public speaker (great voice). He wasn’t very good at many other things like fund raising, business or just working with others. He constantly fell down in to personal disputes, flame wars, spreading malicious gossip often started by anti White Js. I was one of HAC’s targets.
It’s just reality that American White nationalism isn’t a good place to make a decent living, meet women, get a GF or a wife. Because of this our “Movement” relies on volunteers, asking everyone to give their time, talents for “free” – our “Dad” talked about this same problem back in his day about “Folkish movements not being run on sound business principles and old “folkish movement” people being very jealous of younger people being successful, winning things, making $ money. We saw this big time in the “movement” jealousy of David Duke’s mainstream success in the early 1980s.
Here’s a video I made of H Covington’s excellent talk “Who Was George Lincoln Rockwell”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DyQrWPNKJYxX/
J Ryan
OD, TPC Radio Show
Jack,
I am grateful to you for providing two brief but, seemingly, honest opinions of HAC.
D
A lot of Covington’s fiction was not what was published as novels or stories. It was pure slander directed at highly principaled White advocates who were his superiors in every way. It was slander intended to destroy the reputations of good men, and possibly result in their false prosecution. Harold Covington was a backstabbing snake. The fact that he scribbled a few novels does not change that.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/07/death-of-a-con-man/
C.E.
I appreciate your opinion and the link to the article in NV. I believe a Covington “can of worms” has been opened as it has certainly resulted in varied discourse. I will continue my quest to find out more about the man.
Deb
We racial nationalists are in the truth business, Deb. We despise lies and liars. I’m unable to post links here, but carefully follow the one Mr. Whiteoak was able put up above from National Vanguard, and the one imbedded shortly down from the beginning of Mr. Strom’s article, to “Setting the Record Straight,” and you’ll find everything you need to know about the nefarious enemy of our noble cause, fiction writer “Big Lie” Covington.
Bottom line: character counts.
I just revisited that article and found below it this long-lost piece by the highly respected British nationalist leader, John Tyndall, about Covington:
—
ENTER THE MYSTERIOUS
MR. COVINGTON
In our investigations into people with contacts with Combat 18 one name kept on cropping up again and again. This was an American called Harold Covington, who was found residing in Britain for a while some years ago and was closely involved with a number of people from whose rands C18 emerged. It has even been suggested that he was C18’s founder. Mr. Covington’s political ideas closely parallelled those being peddled by C18 today.
It seems that at that time he was doing a lot of jetting around the world while pleading poverty to his supporters. It was a matter of interest to us that Mr. Covington was able to stay in this country for some while, while having no trouble with immigration authorities as an “undesirable” — a hospitality not extended to revisionist Fred Leuchter, as many of our readers will recall.
I happened to meet Harold Covington when he called at my home back sometime around 1981. I certainly found him to be intelligent, though there was something about the man’s personality that told me I should be on my guard. I did not think very much more about him until the C18 business forced us to take a further look at him.
I promptly did some writing and telephoning to my numerous friends and contacts in the United States to see what they could tell me about Mr. Covington. The picture that emerged only deepened my suspicions concerning his liaison with people over here.
Covington, I learned, had built for himself a notorious reputation throughout the racial movement in America as a catalyst of internal conflict, distrust and division. He made a specialty out of condemning some of the leading activators of the American Right, either just by disparaging their efforts as being of no value or by going yet further and blackening their characters with highly personalized smears. He spent a great deal of time sending circulars to people all around the world the contents of which were occupied with attacks made more on fellow racial nationalists than on our common political enemies. This latter I could confirm because one or two of these circulars had been posted to me. One leader of the movement in the US whom I know personally and whose judgement I greatly respect told me he thought it very likely that Covington had for some years been working for the FBI, though I have no way of proving or disproving this.
What is known is that Combat 18 had for a while used an American contact address for some of its literature so as to get around Britain’s draconian race laws. This address, when traced, turned out to be one supplied by Harold Covington. If my American contact’s theory about Covington’s connections are correct, it would mean that large numbers of people in Britain who have written off to his mailing address in response to C18 literature would have had their names and addresses passed on straight away to the FBI, who would in turn have supplied them to the political police in this country, whether MI5, Special Branch or both…
Deb: Sadly, I can’t afford Paywall access but would like to comment on Covington… I’ve come across much negativity about him which I find perplexing but don’t know enough about the man to either agree or disagree. If any readers can point to media that supports either opinion, I would appreciate it.
Deb, I’m thankful that I purchased C-C paywall privileges if only to straighten out some here who are fans of Covington’s fiction, but perplexed as to why anyone would say anything negative about the professional smear artist and political saboteur.
Talented fictional wordsmithing is not a virtue, not when used nefariously.
I couldn’t bring myself to read beyond the first paragraph of the puff piece by Mr. Clark, who is apparently a Covington fan. He writes:
—
Harold was as much an enemy to White Nationalism, judging by the vitriol poured on him by the National Alliance…
Much of the alleged “vitriol” that was heaped on “Big Lie” Covington came from me as I was a primary target of his poison pen, going back to 1988 when he sued me and Ben Klassen for libel — dropped by him after I answered the frivolous claim using as the truth of what we had written about him as the best defense against his defamation claim. That was 35 years ago. I venture to say I know more than anyone on C-C about Covington.
Covington continued his smears of me after I’d joined Dr. William Pierce’s National Alliance in 1992, even claiming then that Pierce was a “federal asset,” and I was a “deep cover FBI Special Agent who had “successfully infiltrated the White resistance movement for 14 years” and while Pierce’s employ. Yes, the vitriol was flowing from me — except that everything I had to say about him was true, and everything he said about me were bald-faced lies. His fans couldn’t distinguish his fiction from truth. They didn’t care to know the truth.
After he had spread all over Usenet that I needed to be “terminated with extreme prejudice,” and after he put in his cheesy newsletter that I was “John Doe #2, Timothy McVeigh’s handler,” I decided it was time for me to sue the SOB for defamation, which I did.. That was in 1996 — 27 years ago. 18 months later I easily prevailed in that action and was awarded a sizable judgement by the judge who had had enough of Covington’s bs and asked me in open court, “Will, how much money do you want?”
I eventually settled with the SOB after chasing his sorry ass around the country from state to state to exercise the judgment, that by then amounted to more than $250,000. He quit running, hired an attorney and declared bankruptcy. I still managed to squeeze several thousand dollars out of him. He never informed his dim-witted suckers that he declared bankruptcy to avoid execution of my judgment or that he was forced to pay me for his outrageous defamations.
You can read more about “Big Lie” here, where there is a link to much more from truth-teller Hadding Scott:
I’m unable to post the link, but try “Setting the Record Straight” at noncounterproductivedotflawlesslogicdotcom or at nationalvanguarddotorg.
Don’t take my word for it, but you can trust another truth-teller, Martin Kerr, who leads George Lincoln Rockwell’s successor group, New Order, who had this to say about Covington in a comment there a couple of years ago when Edmund Connelly tried to rehabilitate the fraud with another puff piece on TOO:
Again I can’t paste what Mr. Kerr had to say, but the article and comments are still up at TOO at “The War on Whites Harold Covington’s Northwest Novels.” Kerr said there: “No one did more harm to the cause of pro-White advocacy than Covington. From the mid-1970s until his death, he did everything he could to weaken, harm and destroy that cause…”
I’m presuming that is the same cause that is promoted here at C-C.
There is another puff piece about Covington and his trashy novels by Connelly at TOO from 2011 with 393 comments, many unfavorable as I recall, but comments are not only closed under that one, but, unfortunately, unavailable.
Will, thank you for a honest and thorough explanation of your experience and perception of Mr. Covington. An avid reader and fairly new to White Nationalism, I read to obtain a variety of perspectives on those who have become historical figures as well as what the movement entails. I agree that Talented fictional wordsmithing is not a virtue, not when used nefariously, however, I am comfortable with my praise of Covington’s A Distant Thunder just as I am comfortable praising Pierce’s The Turner Diaries. You, and two other gentlemen have provided valuable feedback and resources for me to peruse additional material about Covington. I am sorry your experience with Covington was negative and harmful. My journey to further knowledge and understanding of WN will result in my own opinions of its most prominent figures, past as well as present. Thank you, again, for taking the time to provide your personal history with HAC and I promise to explore the names and websites you’ve mentioned. I am familiar with NV and am humbled by the many earnest responses to my initial request.
Deb
I am no fan of the late Harold Covington, who I strongly suspect was a “double agent” for the FBI in their infamous COINTELPRO campaign against White nationalists such as Robert Shelton, Robert Scoggin, and James Venable. No one more than Sumner Humphrey Ireland (pseudonym Wilmot Robertson) did more to outline the “Jewish” destruction of basic American cultural values and liberties in his original classic 1972 bestseller, THE DISPOSSESSED MAJORITY.
jack ryan od: Harold Covington was our best writer and a damn good teacher…
Here’s a video I made of H Covington’s excellent talk “Who Was George Lincoln Rockwell”… -J Ryan OD, TPC Radio Show
“Our” best writer? I don’t know who “our” could be, but it doesn’t say much for your TPC Radio Show if y’all consider Covington to be your best writer and teacher. Or maybe you just haven’t read any other writers?
I’ll pass on your video of Covington’s “excellent” talk, thanks, but since you mention that it’s about GLR, you and your radio listeners may want further insight into who Commander Rockwell was and his assassination, from an honest writer and researcher on the subject, here: noncounterproductivedotflawlesslogicdotcomforwardslasharchiveforwardslash.
I must write the link like that because for some reason I’m unable to put the actual link here at C-C in a comment.
The piece is titled “On the Murder of George Lincoln Rockwell” in Hadding Scott’s “Setting the Record Straight.” Google Jews had removed Hadding’s valuable blog, but Kevin Strom managed to salvage it and put back up on flawlesslogicdotcom. If you can figure out how to reach the archive there from what I wrote, you will find at least a couple of dozen truthful testimonies from those who unfavorably interacted with your Mr. Covington. After reading a few of those you may want to reconsider the praise you heap on your “best writer and damned good teacher.”
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment