Counter-Currents
971 words
Even though it’s widely acknowledged in the scientific community that all personality traits are heritable, studying racial differences in intelligence is still a controversial matter. Some people worry that unpalatable findings may be employed by racists to justify black inferiority. Such concerns are misplaced, however. Though important, intelligence is not a measure of self-worth, and racists are in the minority.
According to researchers, IQ is highly heritable and genetic; thus, if blacks and whites pass on traits to children, why would some think that genes fail to even partially explain the black-white IQ gap? In fact, there is overwhelming evidence to suggest that the black-white IQ gap is genetic, and many of these studies are quite recent. Without an introduction to these findings, the public will be unable to form a logical opinion on the matter. In this piece, readers therefore will be invited to a synopsis of the latest findings in intelligence research.
The objective of this article is to disseminate obscure research to a discerning public with the expectation that readers will scrutinize these conclusions for themselves. Richard Lynn, in his pioneering 2015 book Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis, points out that when tests measure the intelligence of black and white university students from similar backgrounds, whites still record an IQ advantage. Similarly, comparisons of elite African students with European university students show an IQ advantage for whites.
Davide Piffer, in a recent paper measuring gaps in intelligence between Africans and Europeans, found that Europeans have higher polygenic scores for educational attainment than Africans. Due to significant differences between Africans and Europeans at the genetic loci linked to educational attainment, Piffer diminished environmental influences as a significant explanation for the black-white IQ gap. Furthermore, advances in admixture studies equally confirm the genetic basis of this gap.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s In Defense of Prejudice here
Using data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort database consisting of intelligence scores and the racial identity of participants, Jordan Lasker and his co-researchers examined the relationship between European ancestry and cognitive ability. That the researchers had access to the genotyped DNA samples of participants makes the findings particularly compelling. Intriguingly, the results reveal that European ancestry is a consistent predictor of cognitive ability and is significant in all regression models.
Additionally, a complementary study by Meng Hu analyzed the association between European ancestry and cognitive ability in an American sample and opined that European ancestry correlates with intelligence. The author also found that blacks with more European ancestry have superior cognitive abilities. Researchers often observe a positive link between European ancestry and intelligence; however, the association between African ancestry and cognitive ability is negative, as we will demonstrate.
A companion paper by John G. R. Fuerst and colleagues performed admixture regression analyses with data from the American Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Cohort and concluded that possessing African and Amerindian ancestry is negatively associated with intellectual ability. Even after controlling for socio-cultural factors, the authors still identify a negative link between non-European ancestry and cognitive ability. To explain these results, Fuerst and colleagues theorize that African, Amerindian, and other groups inherited alleles from their ancestors which make them susceptible to lower levels of cognitive ability.
Because these findings are so contentious, Fuerst conducted another study to explore the possibility that earlier results were a consequence of mismeasurement, but instead of refuting previous findings, he confirmed a robust link between lower cognitive ability and African ancestry. Even critical discussions of intelligence studies posit support for the black-white IQ gap. Russel Warne’s review of five strands of evidence in The American Journal of Psychology validates genetic explanations for IQ gaps. Warne’s summation of the data is quite sober:
The five types of circumstantial evidence here are not, individually, conclusive regarding the potential of genetic influences on mean differences among racial groups in the United States. Each has its own strength and weaknesses. For example, the GWAS evidence consists of just three studies, but these studies provide direct evidence of the influence of specific genes on intelligence in different racial groups.
Although most studies examining the black-white IQ gap measure the abilities of Americans, outside of America the conclusions are similar. Evaluating data on the intelligence of British workers on the Prolific Platform, researchers aver that the black-white IQ gap is substantial and tests for measurement invariance found no bias or bias of an insignificant degree. Indeed, there is a genetic basis for the black-white IQ gap. But what are the implications of blacks having lower IQs on average?
Based on data from the United Kingdom, we can deduce that IQ gaps between blacks and whites explain racial income gaps. For example, one study argues that as job complexity increases, the share of white and Asian workers will increase, but the percentage of black employees declines. Sophisticated jobs offer better compensation; if on average blacks are less intelligent, they will therefore be employed in less lucrative professions and earn less than whites.
Yet, this does not spell doom for black Americans. Living standards vary across the United States, so blacks residing in cheaper states can enjoy a relatively high living standard. Further, market economies respond to demand, hence even nonsensical pursuits will yield profit if they are embraced by ordinary people. Considering that America is a rich country, blacks in America do better than people elsewhere. Moreover, living standards are rising for black Americans, so it should not matter that on average whites are better off, because equalizing incomes would not ameliorate blacks’ conditions.
Disparities are the norm rather than the exception, and the black-white IQ gap is just one of several disparities. It’s evident that the black-white IQ gap has a genetic basis, and stating otherwise will not alter this reality, nor will it improve the status of black Americans. Our only option is to accept the science and desist from fixating on racial disparities.
* * *
Like all journals of dissident ideas, Counter-Currents depends on the support of readers like you. Help us compete with the censors of the Left and the violent accelerationists of the Right with a donation today. (The easiest way to help is with an e-check donation. All you need is your checkbook.)
For other ways to donate, click here.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
9 comments
That’s all very well, but these findings will be ignored or suppressed by mainstream media, for Oxford-educated British journalist and cultural critic Angela Saini is their anointed expert. She authored the 2019 book Superior: The Return of Race Science, which was praised to the skies by the Guardian and selected as a Top Ten Book by the venerable scientific journal Nature. And naturally her dusky yet easy-on-the-eye visage is frequently to be seen on the BBC whenever the need arises to police the boundaries of acceptable anthropological thought. For Ms Saini has shown that far from being natural categories, the notions of Race and the Measurability of Intelligence are merely a fiendish scheme devised by wicked white males to keep themselves at the Top of the Tree and to demoralise the Global Majority of Persons of Colour — as a prelude no doubt to enslaving and genociding them. Ex Cathedra dicta from persons as well-connected and impeccably credentialed as Ms Saini are simply not up for debate in our media — to dissent is to declare one’s own ignorance and inferiority (the pejorative of choice for such incorrigibles being gammon, referring to the unattractive complexions sported by middle-aged white British males of a conservative bent). I do hope we can bear this in mind in future: it will spare us a lot of trouble and wasted effort.
Nature is a piss-soaked yellow smut rag. And Ms. Saini’s existence slaughters the credibility of any institution that credentialed her.
If you want to add to the evaluation of Black vs. White I.Q. — ‘abilities’, ‘creativity’, ‘productivity’, and such measures of brain output, check the annual financial and economic measurements by country. For instance, the birth-rate in relation to economic output and that sort of thing. Check Africa. You will be amazed. Yes, the entire continent at once, in relation to single European countries like Germany, etc. These sorts of statistics are really eye-openers.
Africa has a population approximating 1.4 Billion, if indeed they can keep track of that sort of thing, and birth rates by countries within Africa average 5 to 8 kids for each woman in most. Compare that to the U.S., with 350 Million, and heaven knows what the birth rate is here with all the immigrants. It’s definitely below replacement for the White population of approximately 170 Million. We need to get busy in that department, regardless of who else lives here.
By measuring economic output, no one can accuse you of racism.
Another sound and solid piece from Mr. Matthews. I am a hard hereditarian, and obviously encourage all honest research into race (and other genetic) differences. But I’m also a white preservationist, and these studies, while very necessary, are nevertheless never in themselves going to end white oppression, or win us our Ethnostate (after all, much similar empirical research demonstrates white/Oriental and white/Jewish IQ divides disfavoring us). Our major foci must be building the ethical case for white separation, while simultaneously building up our power (from political to physical) to effectuate that desire for separation and new sovereignty.
Our enemies don’t care about truth, but only power. Only our people truly care about the objective truth. But truth without the power to act upon it is useless.
Great essay, Lipton.
It got duplicated
It’s good to read hard data every now and then.
In Farron’s Affirmative Action Hoax, the author provides data showing that the lowest socioeconomic group of whites still outperform the highest socioeconomic group of blacks on the SAT. I find that interesting because it means that the blacks with the highest level of educational advantage and stability still underperform the huwhites from the most unstable backgrounds, your meth heads, trailer trash, etc. It implicitly controls for social factors, in other words.
It’s not just IQ that is different but also motivation, values, ethics, priorities and others.
The average US black has an IQ of 85 and blacks are prone to stealing, raping, assaulting and murdering in far greater rates than any other race. They also litter far, far more than anyone else.
White people who have IQ’s in the 80’s or below do not commit crimes or litter anywhere near the rates that blacks do. In fact many White low IQ people have jobs (albeit unsophisticated ones) and are law-abiding productive members of society.
I wouldn’t have thought of litter as a particularly Black problem. It used to be associated with Hispanics, but it seems more like a foreigner thing than anything else.
Litter is a funny thing. I very rarely see anyone actually littering, and yet there’s still plenty of litter around, especially this time of year.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment