The unprecedented use of artillery, airstrikes, tanks, and a whole arsenal of other weapons have destroyed much of the infrastructure in Gaza, but the war rages on, as the Palestinian fighters are well entrenched. The pattern has been that, after the bombardments cease and Israeli armored vehicles roll in, Gaza’s defenders emerge from their tunnel complexes and attack the Israeli soldiers, sometimes destroying their tanks and personnel carriers. The fighting has been vicious. The displacement, dispossession, and death of civilians has been even more horrific.
As Israel continues its combined arms attack against the Gaza Strip to not only mete out a terrible retribution for the October 7 raids, but to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians once and for all, they are sustaining significant casualties. In an effort to preserve the genetic legacy of their dead soldiers, medical personnel have been deployed to harvest their sperm. Jewish families, in conjunction with the Israeli military and the state, have given the go ahead for medical teams to capture and preserve this sperm so that the dead may still procreate. This may seem shocking to many, but it stands to reason that the hyper-ethnocentric Jewish state would take the necessary steps to preserve the reproductive material of its soldiers.
Talia Geva, the head of the Israeli Health Ministry’s fertility and childbirth department, knows that time is of the essence when harvesting sperm from dead Israeli men, as it cannot survive more than four days after a man’s death. “The faster we do it, the greater the chance of finding moving sperm,” Geva said. “The best chance for sperm preservation is within 24 hours of death, and there are differences between the first half of the day and the second.”
Those military personnel assigned to inform loved ones of their sons’ passing also provide the families with information about sperm extraction. Israel is a “fertility powerhouse,” with over 10,000 in vitro fertilization (IVF) babies having been born in 2021 alone.
According to the Knesset’s Health Committee, as of November 15, 2023 sperm has been collected from 39 dead men since the fighting began. Of that number, 32 were soldiers and the remaining 7 were civilians. That total has undoubtedly risen, given that the fighting is ongoing. Normally in peacetime, permission to harvest sperm must be granted by both the families and the legal system, but that process has been expedited since the current conflict began.
In a 2014 Counter-Currents article entitled “Against Good Breeding: Understanding Jewish Opposition to Eugenics,” Marian Van Court states:
Eugenics is widely reviled as “the ideology of the holocaust,” the most diabolical scheme in all of history. Furthermore, the very idea of Jewish eugenics may seem strange, since eugenics is associated in the minds of most people with the Nazis. Nevertheless, eugenics is now, and has always been, practiced in Israel . . .
Van Court then goes on to describe the state of eugenic breeding initiatives in Israel at the time (italics in original):
Today in Israel, abortion is not a controversial issue. Human embryos are not considered sacred. The new eugenic reproductive technologies — pre-natal diagnosis, abortion of defective fetuses, in vitro fertilization, surrogacy — are all encouraged by the government and widely utilized by the population. (It should be noted, however, that Palestinians are not encouraged to take part, as their fertility is seen as a threat to the state.) In fact, surrogate mothers are paid by the government. There are 16 sperm banks in Israel, and more in vitro fertilizations are performed there per capita than in any other country in the world. Stem cell research is not strictly regulated in Israel. In short, their pragmatic attitude towards issues surrounding human reproduction contrasts sharply with that in America.
This is further confirmation of Israel’s historic and ongoing adoption of eugenic measures. Furthermore, it illustrates the Jewish state’s view of Palestinians and their fertility as an existential threat.
Despite the widespread vilification campaign that Jews have waged against eugenics and white gentile eugenicists, Israeli Jews are harvesting human biologics for their own purposes. Thanks in large part to the efforts of scholars on the dissident Right, Jewish hypocrisy on any number of issues has become glaringly apparent. Whether it is eugenics, immigration policy, racial differences, diversity, transgenderism, globalism, or any number of other issues, Jews do what is in their interests — depending on where they reside. If modern-day eugenics was being practiced by whites in America with the express purpose of racial improvement, there would be an unprecedented vilification campaign aimed at combating the resurgence of breeding programs, with inevitable comparisons made to the Third Reich and genocide.
The Jewish effort to vilify those who advocate for eugenic policies — other than themselves — is consistent with their strategy to weaken their racial and religious enemies. In Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition, Kevin MacDonald states that “[b]y 1938 eugenics — a commonly held perspective among all political persuasions earlier in the century — was ‘shunned in public discourse of the day’ because of its associations with National Socialism.”[1]
The science of eugenics is based on the notion that humanity can be improved by selective breeding. This view is essentially correct. Physical characteristics such as height, hair, and eye color, along with intelligence, physical strength, and overall health, are heritable traits that can be selected for. Even though the notion of selectively breeding humans to allow our race to grow in strength, intelligence, and beauty has been unjustly vilified, eugenic initiatives, if implemented, would undoubtedly lead to vast improvements.
It is possible to breed certain genetic traits, such as eye color and temperament, into animals. The practice of animal husbandry has been ongoing for centuries. All domesticated animals that proliferate throughout the world are the beneficiaries of some form of selective breeding.
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, during the high watermark of eugenic thought, there were numerous academic departments devoted to the new science, which gained widespread attention and popularity, especially in the English-speaking world. Francis Galton, Karl Pearson, Charles Darwin, and many others on both the Left and Right subscribed to the notion that racial improvement through the selective breeding of humans of high genetic quality would undoubtedly be beneficial for the societies in which they lived.
Negative eugenics, with its focus on the sterilization of the mentally handicapped, alcoholics, and the criminally prone, contrasted with positive eugenic policies, which aimed to breed the best offspring by bringing together physically and mentally desirable parents. Eugenics or racial hygiene policies were enacted in National Socialist Germany as well. Because of post-war Jewish ethnic activism, however, the legacy of eugenics in National Socialist Germany acts as the fruit of the poisonous tree, thereby rendering the practice of eugenics by any white non-Jews morally reprehensible. And yet, Jews themselves have practiced eugenics for centuries.
As the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict grinds on, the Israelis will continue to harvest the genetic material they need from their dead. Even though sperm extraction and artificial fertilization practices are relatively new, it is consistent with Israel’s historic affinity for eugenics.
For all their protestations about eugenics and their opposition to white gentiles who wish to preserve their own genetic heritage, the Jews are actively engaging in it. Whether it is through securing their own borders or opening those of others, inter-ethnic networking, promotion or vilification, genocidal annihilation, or eugenics, Jews do what is best for them no matter where they reside. Meanwhile, non-Jews are vilified and subjected to genocidal policies. Many whites are completely unaware of the war being waged against them, even if they know intuitively or instinctually that something is amiss.
How do we ensure that our genetic legacy is here to stay and that our children have a future in the lands that were carved out of the wilderness by our ancestors? I think the answers are contained in the writings of the dissident Right’s key figures, as well as the once-revered figures of the past such as Karl Pearson, Charles Darwin, Francis Galton, Lothrop Stoddard, Madison Grant, J. Philippe Rushton, or Richard Lynn.
Jews avail themselves of the most advantageous group strategies, including eugenics, while denying those same tactics to non-Jews. Whether it is whites of Northern European heritage or Palestinians in Gaza, Jews do their best to annihilate their enemies by any means at their disposal.
Note
[1] Kevin B. MacDonald, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition (Self-published, 2019), 301; see also Kevin B. MacDonald, “Enemies of my Enemy,” in Cultural Insurrections: Essays on Western Civilization, Jewish Influence, and Anti-Semitism (Atlanta: The Occidental Press, 2007), 262.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
13 comments
Israel has a department of fertility and childbirth? That’s a new one on me. Well then – where’s ours?
On a side note, around 1977 or so, I remember government funded PSAs on TV encouraging people not to have kids. From what I read, there was a measurable dip in the birth rate nine months after the ad campaign. (Golly, I wonder if they made any of these PSAs in Spanish?) More recently, the MSM did their “childfree” push, including glossy magazine colors – the happy couples were all White, of course.
My parents subscribed to the idea of zero population growth that resulted at least in part from (((Paul Ehrlich’s))) 1968 book, The Population Bomb. Not coincidentally, most of my friends had one sibling, although I knew some Catholic families with three children. Predictably, my Gen X cohort mostly has one child or none. It doesn’t take too much guesswork to figure out where this trend is going.
Jews are defeating us Whites and Jews are successfully genociding us Whites because Jews are superior to us Whites in racial ethnocentrism. All the Jewish advantages of aggressiveness, mental intensity, collectivism and team-mindedness, and intelligence and wealth serve and benefit from the devotion of the Jews to taking their own side in genetic group competition. In comparison to this, we are not good enough. That’s why we are dying.
We cannot reduce Jewish aggression, racial ethnocentrism, or eugenic determination; we can only devote ourselves to do better.
Responding to facts like these in the proper way is more important that any amount of talk about “right” and “left,” and “nationalism,” and “tradition,” or what is supposedly best for “all mankind” in a future our race won’t live to see unless we start competing on the necessary level.
Instead of vilifying Israel, the White Right should be arguing in favor of emulating it. I recall way back in the 80s, when I was prowhite but much less knowledgeable, thinking how I wished whites would behave more like Jews, at least wrt community issues. The Jews are by far the most ethnocentrically successful people I know of. Don’t we wish to be like them, ethnonationally-speaking?
The good news is that if the Zionist Jews could win their ethnostate, the much larger number of prowhite whites can win ours.
It’s not a dichotomy. We should both pursue our own interests while cheering on the destruction of an enemy group.
Do married women really want to have another kid with their deceased husband, or would they rather just remarry another nice Jewish boy? It seems to me that any Jewish military losses can more than be made up for from the Diaspora. And if dysgenics were really a concern, one could donate to a bank before getting deployed, like getting vaccinated. What are the Israelis doing with all this sperm harvested from the dead? The dead have little or no baggage, so methinks this is meant to encourage Jewish Lesbians to procreate.
🙂
As ugly as the Gaza thing is, it’s not exactly a meat grinder war, but more like a major flareup of the same spit-in-your-eye war they’ve had off and on since 1948. So I don’t think that fear of depopulation is what it’s about. The only thing that makes sense is that it’ll be a way for their wives to have more kids with their late husbands. Still, the whole thing seems a bit macabre, if that’s the right word for it. I wonder if the Israelis themselves have described why they’re doing all this?
Yeah, unless the military death benefits for Israeli widows are extraordinarily generous, I have trouble imagining why a woman would want to start and raise a big brood of fatherless children. Weird.
🙂
The Israelis are clearly applying the concept of tikkun olam to their vision of Valhalla. The fallen heroes will live again in a place that has a more hospitable climate than Asgard and plenty of opportunities to die in battle.
This is just weird. It reminds me of the conception of Garp in John Irving’s novel and also of Evelyn Waugh’s plea to humanity in Brideshead Revisited to accept the limitations on it ordained by God.
What’s the value in breeding a race of super-intelligent, beautiful psychopaths? Give me a love story between good-hearted relative simpletons any day.
That must be the reason also that Israel was prioritized by Jewish Pfizer so it became the “first country to vaccinate its way to safety”.
We should advocate for eugenics, but also a system that’s driven by healthy lifestyle choices. There should not be a need for fertilization clinics if young healthy white people just get married and procreate in their twenties. Creating lab babies instead of having natural births because people are too busy partying it up is part of the dystopian nightmare we find ourselves in.
Scavenging sperm – wow! Utterly incredible. The valley of The Jewish nadir gets ever deeper.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment