The Best Nationalist Pamphlet Ever:
26 Concrete Legal Measures for Remigration
Patrick Le Brun
The Identitarians are leading the intellectual work to prepare a moral and legal framework to begin Remigration. This brochure is by far the best political pamphlet I have ever seen. It lives up to the great pamphlets of the past in that it makes the revolution seem possible. I hope that readers in other countries can borrow and adapt some of the points to their own countries and convince their countrymen that “these measures are at once possible and necessary.”
26 Measures for a Policy on Identity and Remigration
Immigration-Islamization.
Tomorrow Remigration!
Inside
- The end of birthright citizenship
- The end of chain migration
- The automatic expulsion of all foreigners who have committed a crime on our soil and a ban on their return
- Put in place agreements with the countries of origin so that naturalized foreigners who have committed crimes here will finish their sentences there
- Retroactive removal of French Citizenship for naturalized foreigners who have committed a crime or misdemeanor in the last 10 years
- Automatic removal of French Citizenship of dual citizens who have committed a crime or misdemeanor
- Put in place an Aid Fund for Return associated with the launching a public relations campaign encouraging immigrants to go home
- Create a High Commission for Remigration
- Freeze naturalizations for countries outside the EU for 10 years, with the exception of Military visas (Foreign Legion)
- Put in place agreements with countries on the south coast of the Mediterranean that stipulates economic and military aid on controlling their emigration zones.
- Put in place a real protection of the EU’s borders, or leave the Schengen zone if this fails to materialize.
- Limit the social safety net and subsidized housing to French nationals and other European nationals.
- Shut down the program of free healthcare for migrants.
- Put in place a system of preferences (local, national, and European) for employers seeking employees. The employers must prove that no local, national, or EU citizen was capable of performing the job before offering the position to foreigners.
- Refuse the concept of H1B immigration and put in place a true partnership with the countries of origin. The objective is to leave elites in their countries of origin while creating cross-border partnerships, particularly with Universities in their own countries.
- Automatic prison sentence for bosses who knowingly hire illegal immigrants.
- Stop the financial support and outlaw organizations who support illegal immigration. Enforce the laws in place against helping illegal immigration and put repeat offenders in prison.
- Outlaw propaganda in favor of immigration through media that is supported with public funds: radio and television channels, but also newspapers that benefit from government aid.
- Outlaw all public and foreign funding to build mosques. Outlaw minarets.
- Outlaw preaching in Arabic.
- Outlaw wearing the hijab in public spaces.
- Outlaw UOIF [similar to CAIR or ISNA in the US] and all organizations linked to the Islamist international network.
- Outlaw ritual slaughter. Create a supplementary tax for all Halal products which are imported. Use a part of that for associations that protect animals and give the rest to the Aid Fund for Return.
- Defend our culinary identity and refuse to submit cafeterias in schools and commercial establishments from accepting the food taboos of foreigners.
- Fight against urban segregations and racism that hurts the true French in certain neighborhoods.
- Create a Minister of Identity and Rootedness
Back
The Socialist government has proposed their “paper on the road to a policy for equality and integration.”
The Bloc Identitaire has decided to respond to this umpteenth provocation by proposing this “sheet on the road to a policy of Identity and Remigration” including 26 measures (covering culture, economy, education and institutional reform) looking forward to ending uncontrolled immigration and replanting immigrants in their country of origin.
Far from the fantasies of “reconciliation” or massive assimilation, we think that the only way to avoid chaos that fatally springs forth from multicultural (and therefore “multiconflictual”) societies is to proceed to remigration, in a peaceful and organized fashion, that is to say the return of a majority of extra-European immigrants from our territory to their countries of origin.
Stop immigration, condemn those who encourage it, stop Islamization, organize remigration with the countries of origin, etc.
The Bloc Identitaire simply proclaims that the French have the same fundamental right as any other people around the world: that is to live in peace, in their homeland, according to their Identity, with other people like themselves. If today, these measures seem “impossible” or “radical” to some, we are persuaded that the time to come will take care of that and make these measure at once possible and necessary.
Related
-
The Unnecessary War
-
It’s Time to Wind Down the Empire of Nothing
-
The Lost Soldiers of Meymac
-
The Last Alarm Call Before Civil War in France?
-
Jonathan Bowden’s Final Lecture on Video: Charles Maurras, Action Française, and the Cagoule
-
On the Hypocrisy of Progressives
-
It’s Not a Revolt, Sire, It’s a Secession
-
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 541 Millennial Woes & Pox Populi on the French Riots Part 2
14 comments
We can think up a range of legislative and administrative rules to be enforced by a bloated bureaucracy that may potentially reverse the flow and pace of immigration. I can think of tougher rules than the ones above.
But the real reversal of that toxic flow can only happen if living circumstances of a migrant become worse on a day-to-day basis. It will happen only when European lands become a less appealing destination for them.
But how will that be accomplished when European governments are doling out welfare cash and the populace are drunk on ”tolerance”? When you ”tolerate” as a people you make room for the alien parasite to get attached to you and bleed you dry. Without these basic attitudinal changes, I believe, Europe has already lost the war of mass immigration. Those who dream of bringing about the reversal of mass immigration with changes in bureaucratic rules are day-dreaming.
Mass immigration is war by another name and means. When the Huns and the Goths took on Rome and eventually destroyed it, it wasn’t just a Hunnic or Gothic army that did brought that fate on the Western Roman Empire. The nations of Goths and Huns moved and encroached into Roman lands and piled pressure on its borders. A Christianised, weak Rome stood no chance.
Caution fellow Europeans – observe closely the role of various X-tian denominations, all actively supporting immigrants and clamouring for tolerance. This faith is your ancient enemy. Its the enemy of your native spirituality, its the enemy of your ancestral memories, its the enemy of your Aryan soul. It rendered your own gods homeless in their own lands and now it comes to dispossess you of your ancient lands. Wake up!
You recognize the problem (immigration = invasion by non-military means), and then heap insults on the ancestral faith of the West. What a fool! Christians had no trouble repulsing the Mohammedans for centuries. They lost their will in tandem with their loss of faith. Most Christian leaders today are repulsive, but there is no need to “toss the baby with the bathwater”. The Churches must be racially reformed, forced by their laities to acknowledge the basic human right of communitarian existence. But Christ is far beyond the actions of these little priests and ministers, liberals in ecclesial vestments.
Are there any subtle ways to encourage jewish Aliyah that could be added to this?
The “subtle” way to expell both Jews and Muslims is to outlaw circumcission and ritual slaughter. And you can do it without appearing “racist”, just by invoking human and animal rights. They will self-deport.
27. If you’re not white, you’re out.
This could be the #1 and only requirement, make permanent residency for non-whites illegal, all non-whites would be required to have a Visa (no longer then 1-2 years), any violation of the law you result in an intimidate and permanent expulsion.
TOTAL EXPULSION of all nonwhites from the European continent. This is the sine qua non of the Racial Right. If the purpose of this pamphlet is gradual radicalization working towards that end goal, fantastic! But I hope the ‘generation identitaire’ actually wants expatriation, and not merely immigration controls (however salutary such would be at the moment).
One step above (or below perhaps) kosher conservative. I laughed out loud at this plainly kosher document. If this is the cutting edge in Europe, then I’ve had my fill of bad news for the day. So how many Jews are involved in this outfit anyway?
I suppose now is as good a time as any to say this contributor Patrick LeBrun has been irritating this reader here and at Radix for a couple of years now with his nonstop promotion of kosher mainstreaming perspectives that come to the edge of European cuckservatism.
While I have not read all of LeBrun’s essays or listened to every one of his podcasts, what I have read and heard from him the last couple of years fully justifies labeling him a European variant of a kosher-approved, American civic-propositional nationalist and mainstreamer. In some podcast either here or at Radix, LeBrun basically stated he wasn’t particularly put off by Marine LePen refusing to defend Golden Dawn. That’s just one of many examples of comments by LeBrun that I’ve read or heard that suggest mainstreaming.
It has been sad to watch your decline into a jaundiced, monomaniacal, paranoid crank.
Sad indeed.
I liked a lot of what Lew had to say back when I was actively involved with BUGS and the comments of his I read on C-C. I guess I really have been out of the loop for too long on my personal/career hiatus.
I haven’t read anything else like this from Lew that I can recall, but this definitely was a disappointing comment to read from him.
What happened to no enemies on the Right? We should all be working to push leaders like Marine LePen and others to the Right, showing and demanding that leaders respond to their constituencies that are moving progressively rightward (just as the left has done). That’s a far cry from completely writing them off and anyone who even speaks of them positively. How is that any model for success?
I failed to mention in my introduction that all of the laws listed are constitutional. Some have been enacted or partially enacted already. For example, France used to have birthright citizenship but now has citizenship by descent. Another example, while it is not illegal to preach in Arabic (#20) Mosques (or any other House of Worship) which receive state funds must conduct all preaching in French.
Also, many of these laws have popular support and politicians willing to sponsor them.
Some of the suggestions submitted by commenters would require an abrogation of the constitution, the European Declaration of Human Rights, and the end of democracy. A dictator who agrees with us would be a very efficient way to redress our issues and could even be called a “divine surprise” (to borrow Maurras’ phrase). However, whether or not we were sure of such a future coup d’etat happenning, there is no point in advertising the unpopular decisions the future dictator would later enact. The current political terrain involves constitutional rights, periodic elections, and a media which will distort and supress our message. This pamphlet is adapted to that battlespace.
Sentata,
Franklin is right. Basically anything that marginalizes them as a community by highlighting their sins then linking those as manifestations of group character flaws will start ringing alarm bells. It is enough to simply make the statement wightout cacophonous reproach. They cannot handle criticism. Also, insecurity vis-a-vis Muslims (but not skinheads, etc.) is linked with rising Aliyah rates. Read https://counter-currents.com/2012/08/demographics-and-jewish-destiny-part-1/ for more details on the situation from that perspective.
Lew,
If this article irritates you, then you’re really going to hate my upcoming articles on Planned Parenthood & the Pope and on the constitutional differences between France and the US. I’m still waiting for my personal proofreader to have a look at them. He’s been a little backed up ever since the High Holidays. Hope you have a sweet new year.
Shana Tova,
Patrick
Patrick,
Just heard your podcast on Red Ice Radio and then came to check this out. Good stuff! Thank you for translating and sharing it with us. I think sometimes we forget how much could be done completely within the legal framework as it exists right now. Whoever starts the ball rolling in our direction will need to work within the legal framework as it exists.
Obviously, it would be best if we had a total revolution and pried control of our nations/”the West” away from the hostile elite completely. That, however, is not a realistic possibility at this time. Moving in this realistic direction and continuously pushing rightward is a much more feasible approach. It is a forward thinking, long-term approach that sets the metapolitical groundwork in place for our future hegemonic prosperity.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment