2,119 words

People do seem to have developed an increasing number of allergies these days, don’t they? Peanuts, gluten, lactose, pollen, hard work, dog-semen. . . the list just keeps on growing. Wait, what was that last one again?

Darren Moore was a Welsh drag-queen found lying dead beneath a pile of cardboard boxes in central Cardiff in January 2023. The cause of the demise of this apparently perfectly healthy (physically, not mentally) 39-year-old seemed a mystery at first. As this supposedly much-loved “social butterfly” was last seen wearing “full face make-up, a luminous green dress, a blonde wig and diamante heels and carrying a matching clutch bag,” the strong implication was that he had been cruelly murdered in some transphobic hate-crime incident.

When news emerged that someone had subsequently been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter (surely “personslaughter”?), the BBC interviewed distraught queers gathered around at a public vigil in Moore’s memory, wailing things like “It’s rocked the community, that’s all I can say, no-one’s safe anywhere.” Myky Webb, a Welsh tranny who dresses like a nun made from cheap curtains, called the news “very worrying for Cardiff as a city and for queer people in Cardiff on the scene, to think that this kind of thing still happens in 2023.”

But what kind of thing had just happened in Cardiff city center? Not quite what the BBC initially imagined. . .

One Man and His Dog

This February, an official inquest finally determined the circumstances surrounding Moore’s final hours. On the night in question, after performing in a nightclub, Moore spotted a total stranger out walking his dog shortly before 6 AM. Inviting him towards a deserted carpark for sex, the dog tried to join in too, and his owner quickly “lost interest” in Moore once it became clear the drag queen was more attracted to his animal than he was to him. However, the man told police, “because it was consensual and desired, I let him [the dog] do what he was asked to do.” Moore then fell asleep in an alleyway, where the dog-walker left him. What the stranger did not know was that Moore was severely allergic to dogs, causing the coroner to consider the possibility he had later suffered anaphylactic shock from his exposure to the dog’s seminal fluids.

This was all very embarrassing, as following his death, Mr. Moore had been treated as a veritable St. Darren of Drag, described in gushing terms like “I’ve known him for 20 years, he was the life and soul of everyone’s party, just an amazing guy.” Following his death, Cardiff City Council was so keen to mark his tragic passage (as it were) that they closed a number of main roads in the city-center to all non-gay vehicles for a full 90 minutes, to facilitate his elaborate Victorian-style funeral cortege, complete with black horses and a top-hatted coach-driver, the whole procession protected by policemen. This process basically amounted to Moore being given a quasi-state funeral; councils won’t close their roads and send ranks of cops out for just any old coffin.

Still, one might say in the council’s defense, in the immediate wake of his death, as far as most people knew, Moore simply appeared to be a fun-loving cross-dresser, not a pervert sex-offender. Except that, in 1999, Moore had been imprisoned upon four counts of raping an underage boy, and banned from all future contact with children (judges didn’t think of ordering him to stay away from any puppies). In 2011, he was sentenced again, for breaching this court-order after working as a kids’ gym coach. Several news outlets at the time of Moore’s death and funeral did not bother to report this fact—but they did know. They must have, as the BBC website made a very brief grudging reference to his prior convictions right at the end of one of (but not most of) their own initial reports upon his death—knowing full well most web-users wouldn’t bother scrolling down that far.

Child Labour Abuse

The ongoing police investigations into figures like the Con-Artist Formerly Known As Prince Andrew for their alleged links to Jeffrey Epstein may have given American readers the impression that the main current pedophile scandal across the Atlantic in the UK, just as in the US, has been the close association of corrupt and powerful men with a known millionaire child-abuser. Unproven innuendos about the Left-wing Labour Party Prime Minister Sir Queer Starmer being a connoisseur of barely-legal “twink” Ukrainian rent-boys, or Epstein’s bosom bum-chum Peter Mandelson, Starmer’s chosen ambassador to the US, enjoying the taste of imported young Chinamen’s chopsticks (surely false—he prefers nice young Brazilians) are easy to find online. [1]

As such, you may be led to conclude that this is the reason why fake Labour Party logos like the one below are now trending on British social media:

Meanwhile, other, purportedly genuine, old Labour logos have been satirically repurposed to ask suggestive questions like these:

But looking at it like this is to somewhat misunderstand the present spreading idea of Labour as being enmeshed within a wider Establishment pedophile ring. Emma Lewell is an obscure backbench Labour MP, who recently complained to Sir Keir that she now had “people screaming at me in the street that I am a member of the ‘pedo protectors party.’” It’s the word “protectors” there that is most germane. It is not that the Labour Party are all personally pedophiles themselves—it is more that, if a pedo happens to come from an approved designated victim-group or politically “moral” sector of society, many Labourites automatically tend to quietly leap to their defense.

A Piece of the PIE

In the 1970s, newspapers alleged that the future Labour MPs MPs Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt allowed a self-styled “pedophile rights” group called PIE, or Pedophile Information Exchange, to gain affiliate membership of their organization, the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL). PIE campaigned for the age of consent to be lowered to as young as four and incest to be legalized.

There were even claims the 1970s Labour government funneled tens of thousands of pounds’ worth of taxpayer-funded grants to PIE. Certainly, by 1978, PIE felt so confident its campaign was making headway it sent every British MP a copy of its informative booklet Pedophilia—Some Questions and Answers, in an attempt to cement their described position as “the political wing of pedophilia.” This same year, whilst acting as an NCCL lawyer, a Daily Mail investigation alleged Harman had made attempts to “water down child pornography laws.” In response, she called this a “smear” and insisted she had “nothing to apologize for.”  In the sense that she was definitely not a pedophile herself, this is quite true. Even the Daily Mail said that:

We have never suggested that Harriet Harman supports paedophilia. [But] Everybody who was running the National Council for Civil Liberties at the time in a sense was complicit for not disassociating with that group. It’s a very serious error of judgement.

But what was behind this “serious error of judgement,” precisely? Ideology, probably. Harman, often known as “Harperson” due to her obsessively PC nature, is the inhuman entity most responsible for drafting the Equalities Act 2010, one of the UK’s key early pieces of oppressive DEI legislation. In this light, just look at how PIE’s former leader once reportedly justified his niche sexual tastes: by saying it was “as much a healthy part of the natural diversity of our species as red hair or left-handedness.” “Diversity is our strength” even when it comes to pedos, eh?

Amongst the groups given the most explicit protection by Harperson’s Act are transgenderists and Muslims, of whom most public bodies in the UK are, quite frankly, now scared. This is unfortunate, as a disproportionate number of both groups have clearly been involved in acts of mass organized child-abuse. The way the Labour Party tried its best to cover up the Pakistani grooming-gang scandal is well-known; but the way bodies like Cardiff City Council, which is Labour-controlled, happily closed down the city center streets for the funeral of a known kiddie-fiddler, and the manner in which the equally Left-captured BBC reported on the same man’s death so sycophantically, just because he potentially happened to rape his underage victims whilst wearing a tight sparkly miniskirt, is also part of this same mad diversity-worshipping pattern. Institutional capture is now so bad that, in one case in Bradford, a 15-year-old child’s actual social worker personally attended her illegal marriage to a Pakistani pedophile who raped her, forced her to convert to Islam, and locked her in a cellar.

You can buy Spencer J. Quinn’s Solzhenitsyn and the Right here.

If the offender belongs to a favored minority-group, and revelation of their crimes might act to “stigmatize the wider community,” then the Left-wing hive-mind views the “moral” thing to do to be to cover up or downplay their crimes. That’s why we now get Labour-run councils encouraging schoolkids as young as five to send Valentine’s Day cards to young male “refugees” in order to “dispel prejudice,” despite the fact the universal implications of Valentine’s Day in the Third World are specifically sexual in nature.

It isn’t just Labour; the even Leftier UK Greens made the news this month after one of their number, Councilor Anne Cross, boasted about having her own grandchildren send Valentine’s Day cards to local adult male illegal immigrants in their camp. Cross justified this by saying “there is no evidence children or women are at a higher risk from people seeking asylum than other sections of our society.” No evidence apart from all the constant rapes and murders, that is.

A Nation of Dog-Lovers

In a way, this is all far worse than an Epstein-like elite pedophile cabal operating secretly at the heart of government. What we have instead here is systemic rather than individual corruption, in which kids’ innocence is sacrificed en masse upon the altar of political correctness. This is obviously terrible, but it can potentially be leveraged to our own political advantage. One of the key ways the Left in Ireland managed to ascend to power from the late 1990s onwards was by deliberately exploiting that country’s pedophile priest scandal in order to undermine the traditional, conservative, Catholic state as a whole. Unsurprisingly, most normal people don’t want to be governed by those who cover up for child-rapists on an industrial scale for selfish ideological purposes, and are willing to vote against them.

In 1990s Ireland, however, the Leftists had the already compliant mass media largely on their side, hammering home their point on a relentless daily basis. Nowadays, with the rise of social media, people in Britain have a chance to discredit our own current corrupt Left-wing ruling caste in a similar manner. It should be easy to do. The public appear receptive to the message that Leftwingers are happy to trade their children’s safety and innocence for keeping hold of precious client-class votes, and the evidence is abundant—and not only in terms of quasi-state funerals for dog-bummers.

If an offender simply happens to be Left-wing, they are often given the automatic benefit of the doubt, too. The latest Labour scandal involves Lord Doyle, Keir Starmer’s former Director of Communications, who kept on campaigning for a friend of his named Sean Morton, despite Morton having a prior conviction for possessing explicit child-sex images (and ones of people like Darren Moore raping dogs) from 2017. As a result, voters are now openly calling Labour MPs “pedo lovers” on the doorstep, leading none other than Harriet Harperson to step in and offer an allegedly “obvious” potential solution: if there were so many male nonce-facilitators at the top of Labour, the PM should appoint a female Deputy Leader of the party immediately, as they were obviously far above all such moral corruption. What, like you were in the 1970s, you mean?

Supposedly, Starmer didn’t know about the link between Doyle and Morton until very recently, but questions have been raised about whether or not this is really true. As one of Labour’s own peers, Ayesha Hazarika, observed of the scandal:

This guy was convicted of very, very serious pedophilic crimes. Forget the vetting process, what’s happening with the nonce-detector at Downing Street? [2]

It’s been deliberately turned off, Ayesha: otherwise they’d lose the Muslim and the trans vote. And, now that they’ve comprehensively lost the normal person vote, that’s pretty much all they’ve got left. That and the dog-lovers’ vote, of course.

Notes

[1] Before Starmer or Mandelson sue, we should make it clear we possess no evidence such rumors are in any way true; anyway, so bloodless is he, I’d personally be less surprised to find Sir Keir reproduced parthenogenically, like an amoeba.

[2] In British English, a “nonce” is a male sex-abuser of little boys.