Counter-Currents
1,361 words
Allexis Ferrell was drawn into a national controversy during the summer’s presidential campaign about black people eating cats. (Canton Police Department)
Cat-Eating Black Woman Finally Sentenced for Eating a Cat
One the most memorable events during this year’s presidential campaign, one that grandparents will fondly recall to their grandkids in generations to come, was Donald Trump’s allegation during his debate with Kamala Harris that Haitian migrants in Springfield, OH were eating cats and dogs. At the time, many said that this alone would sink Trump’s chances of reelection.
Although no hard evidence exists to suggest she’s also eaten a dog, and even though she’s a Jamaican woman from nearby Canton, OH, 27-year-old Allexis Ferrell was sentenced to a one-year term last Monday after pleading guilty to animal cruelty. Late last summer, police bodycam footage captured her on all fours eating the hapless slaughtered feline in the parking lot of a public housing complex.
In the words of the criminal complaint filed on August 16: “The Defendant did kill a companion animal (cat) by stomping its head then eating the cat.”
In sentencing the cat-eating Negress, Judge Frank Forchione sternly intoned:
You’ve embarrassed this nation…. To me, you present quite a danger to our community…. This is repulsive to me. I mean, that anyone would do this to an animal. And an animal’s like a child. I don’t know if you understand that or not. I can’t express the disappointment, shock, [and] disgust that this crime has brought to me.
Maybe Ms. Ferrell does understand that an animal’s like a child. At the time she ate the cat, she’d been on probation for a 2023 case of child endangerment. Court records do not specify whether she’d also stomped on the child’s head and eaten it.
Now that Donald Trump has been reelected, here’s hoping that black people across the nation—whether migrants or native-born—have been put on notice that they will no longer be able to get away scot-free with eating house pets. Such things come with penalties.
Newsweek: Joe Biden Pardoned His Son, So Why Didn’t He Also Pardon Thousands of Black Crackheads?
Last Sunday, wandering corpse Joe Biden issued his son Hunter a full and unconditional pardon “For those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024…”
In June, Hunter Biden was convicted of three felonies for federal gun violations. In September, he pled guilty to three felony tax offenses and six misdemeanors. He hasn’t been sentenced for any of these convictions but faced a combined 42 years.
Audio version: To listen in a player, use the one below or click here. To download the mp3, right-click here and choose “save link/target as.”
The interesting thing about his dad’s blanket pardon was that it extended all the way back to January of 2014, when Hunter was allegedly involved in shady operations in Ukraine, and all the way forward to December 1 of this year, right up to the minute that Joe issued the pardon. For crimes both charged and uncharged, he was covering his son’s ass—something Hunter Biden failed to do in his sordid laptop porn videos.
As we all know, Hunter’s dad had previously promised not to pardon his son, and yet here he dodders along and pardons him, anyway. What a hypocrite!
Although Hunter Biden’s innumerable crimes had nothing to do with black people—unless he purchased his crack from them—along comes Darvio Morrow on Newsweek to make it all about black people, anyway. In an Op-ed titled “Where’s the Pardon for Thousands of Black Men Locked Up for What Hunter Did?,” he writes:
As a senator, Biden was one of the authors of the law that his son violated, the prohibition against drug addicts owning guns….
Now consider that Hunter was seen multiple times on tape smoking crack cocaine and wasn’t even charged with possession ….
Well, if Hunter Biden was Hunter Smith from inner city Chicago or Cleveland, he would probably be in prison for multiple years.
There’s so much to unpack here. First off, the gun charges were from 2018. Second, the laptop footage was discovered in 2020, so the crack-smoking may have come after the gun ownership. Third, I don’t think you can be charged with drug possession merely based on a video. Fourth and finally, there has never been, in world history, a black man from inner-city Chicago or Cleveland named “Hunter Smith.”
After Making Millions in Royalties From Trump’s Use of the Song “Y.M.C.A.”, Village People Founder Threatens to Sue Anyone Who Says It’s a “Gay Anthem”
Everyone has always assumed that all members of the disco group Village People are gayer than a rhinestone-encrusted butt plug, but some members of the group deny that. In the Village People’s 1980 movie vehicle Can’t Stop the Music, non-Village Persons Bruce Jenner and Steve Guttenberg were easily the gayest-presenting members of the cast, and this was back before Bruce Jenner transitioned into a she-beast named Caitlyn.
The group’s biggest song, selling over 12 million copies, was 1978’s “Y.M.C.A.” Donald Trump has been using it as an unofficial theme song and frequently dances to it at live rallies.
“Y.M.C.A.” was cowritten by Village People founder and lead singer Victor Willis, who most often appeared dressed as the cop. Last Monday on Facebook, Willis threatened that come January, he will direct his “wife” to sue “each and every news organization” that dares to classify the pulsating, hard-thrusting tune as a “gay anthem”:
The financial benefits have been great as well as Y.M.C.A. is estimated to gross several million dollars since the President Elect’s continued use of the song. Therefore, I’m glad I allowed the President Elect’s continued use of Y.M.C.A. …
There’s been a lot of talk, especially of late, that Y.M.C.A. is somehow a gay anthem. As I’ve said numerous times in the past, that is a false assumption based on the fact that my writing partner was gay, and some (not all) of Village People were gay, and that the first Village People album was totally about gay life. …
Therefore, since I wrote the lyrics and ought to know what the lyrics I wrote is [sic] really about, come January 2025, my wife will start suing each and every news organization that falsely refers to Y.M.C.A., either in their headlines or alluded to in the base of the story, that Y.M.C.A. is somehow a gay anthem because such [a] notion is based solely on the song’s lyrics alluding to elicit [sic] activity for which it does not.
When the Village People’s founder goes MAGA, that’s a seismic cultural shift.
Popular Black Podcasters The Hodgetwins Interview David Duke and Agree on the Great Replacement
David Duke is eminently polite, rational, and loquacious if you let him talk. If you’ve ever had the opportunity to let him talk, you’d know it’s difficult to stop him once he gets started.
Keith and Kevin Hodge are two bearded conservative black podcasters and standup comics known professionally as The Hodgetwins. They have millions of followers across social media. Last Friday, they aired a convivial two-hour interview with David Duke.
Topics covered included:
- David Is Banned From Banking
- Zionism is What Created Nazism
- David Duke Exposes the Sackler Family
- Transgenderism in the Talmud
- The Origins of Porn
- America Went to War With Iraq Because of Israel?
- Is David Attracted to Black Women?
- David Duke Was the Original MAGA
At one point in the interview, Duke said, “When I ran for office, and I got elected to office two or three times, my slogan was, ‘Equal rights for all, special privileges for none,’ and I said unless we stop this immigration, it was gonna be bad news for all the American people – blacks, whites, everybody else that’s in the country. It’s not Great Replacement theory, it’s Great Replacement fact. It’s happened.”
One of the Hodges piped in: “Even blacks have been replaced. We used to be number two in this country.”
“That’s exactly right,” said Duke. Even blacks have been replaced. That’s a really good point.”
The Hodges posted a smiling selfie with Duke in their studio and captioned it, “David Duke is a Real One.”
What a thrilling time to be alive. Black cat-eaters are being brought to justice in Ohio, the Village People’s founder supports Donald Trump, and token black conservatives are giving David Duke’s ideas free rein. Even a month ago, I would have thought it impossible.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
22 comments
And Daniel Penny was found not guilty.
The Best Week Yet.
It’s been an early Christmas since November 7th.
A funny moment in the interview, one of the twins handed Duke a card, an “N-word pass.”
Duke’s amused response: “I never used that word before; should I start??”
The actual quote is “…I never use the N-word” (present tense). The idea that Duke has never used the word “nigger” is laughable. I have heard him use it multiple times while in his presence, although a long time ago. More important is his claim to never have advocated violence. I’ve heard him say that a bullet in the head was needed for a certain person(s). I’ve always thought he would be a communist if he thought he could make more money in it. He’s a convicted shyster.
Now that’s a hoot! I knew what the Village People were all about back when the song came out. It wasn’t even a big deal then, why would it be now?
Absolutely right that black people have their own great replacement by immigration. They are taking working class jobs and elite university positions (something like half to 2/3rd of the blacks at Harvard are immigrant blacks). So immigrants get a hearty helping of the affirmative action to make up for slavery.
It may be debatable about how significant the “first 100 days” are for a presidency, though it makes sense to me that it is the time to get things done when approval ratings are high and congress is tilted on their side (the opposing side does well during the midterms after the presidency switches party affiliation).
There is already a wikipedia page link for Trump’s (2nd term) first 100 days in office.
The best week yet…
And on top of all those improbabilities:
Daniel Penny is free, and no nog rioting!
There will be lots of talk about Luigi Mangione, whose real name sounds more made up than the “Mark Rosario” on his Fake ID. I’m not sure where it is coming from, but he is said to be blogger/writer Zero HP Lovecraft, who lurks in the dissident right and seems intrigued with NRx, Yarvin, Nick Land, BAP, Lovecraft, RF Kennedy, the Kaczynski Manifesto (for a Hawaii book club) and possibly Brandon Cronenberg’s Possessor.
Mangione comes from a quasi neo-artistocratic family who built health care facilities, but he suffered from chronic back pain and had an unsuccessful surgery for it. I think people may have been expecting a loner or incel, not an Ivy League grad, high school valedictorian, rocking climbing guy who may have been flirting with the clerk at the NYC hostel when planning his act… “Hey, toots, I’m from outta town. Who makes good calzone in this neighborhood?”
BLM was quick to respond to the Daniel Penny verdict.
“We need some Black vigilantes,” New York BLM co-founder Hank Newsome said following the verdict. “People want to jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud? How about we do the same when they attempt to oppress us?”
Mangione is not Zero HP Lovecraft… now the hoaxing seems to be about which circulating manifestos might be the real one.
Irony alert for blm idiot. Blacks have been terrorizing whites and anyone else who lives in nyc forever. If there ever was a white guy acting like the deceased on a subway train, I definitely wouldn’t expect any black to do anything. Certainly not one man. They prefer to have lots of backup. Black men or women depend on outnumbering their targets. Why can’t this twit be thankful for the marine who protected all the other passengers regardless of color? At last a good deed goes unpunished. Bravo!
This line jumped out at me from a recent CNN article about YMCA.
“On Facebook, he wrote people assumed that because his writing partner and some members of the band were gay but he said he did not know the YMCA was a place for gay men to hang out when he wrote the song.”
So, it’s not that people wrongly assumed the song was meant as a homo anthem, it’s that the dude who wrote it just didn’t realize the Y was a giant homo hangout. Got it.
“What a thrilling time to be alive. Black cat-eaters are being brought to justice in Ohio, the Village People’s founder supports Donald Trump, and token black conservatives are giving David Duke’s ideas free rein. Even a month ago, I would have thought it impossible.”
…and Israel & it’s American puppet state have just knocked over Syria & can now give free rein to zionazi terrorism all over the M.E. & beyond. Even a month ago, it would have been thought impossible…what a thrilling time to be alive – but for how much longer?
Bashar Assad was an evil man – as evil as Stalin. His regime killed and tortured hundreds of thousands. The people of Syria have been delivered from a tyrant.
This is also a victory for Israel and for US aggression in the Middle East. Usually that’s a bad thing. Nevertheless, in this case, it’s worth the trade-off. The liberation of Syria from the Assad regime is a huge benefit for the whole world.
kolokol: December 11, 2024 Bashar Assad was an evil man – as evil as Stalin.
This is also a victory for Israel and for US aggression in the Middle East. Usually that’s a bad thing. Nevertheless, in this case, it’s worth the trade-off…
—
Bullshit! Written like a true Shabbos goy.
“Our” leaders said the same thing about Saddam Hussein so he could be murdered for Israel. U.S. aggression in the Middle East is always for the benefit of our Jewish masters. Support of that shitty little nation against her neighbors is always a “bad thing.” Let Israel solve her problems without “our” assistance (military, financial or diplomatic). Don’t look to Trump and his team of ultraZionists to do that.
Evil or not, unlike Saddam, Bashar has lived to see another day, rumored to be secured in Moscow. Good for him.
The people of Syria rejoice in their liberation from the tyranny of Bashar Assad. He is a mass murderer, like Idi Amin. It’s good that he’s gone.
However, for the record: I oppose the on-going genocide of the Palestinians by Israel. And I oppose all US aid for Israel – military, financial, diplomatic.
The IDF is guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and other members of his government. The US subsidizes and supports Israel in all its crimes. However, this does not mean that we must support Arab tyrants, such as Bashar Assad.
Luigi’s “manifesto” seen in a comment, here: The Order 2024, part 3 | National Vanguard
—
J Webb: December 10, 2024 … now the hoaxing seems to be about which circulating manifestos might be the real one.
—
This version seems authentic. It clearly addresses the motive for Luigi’s deed. Why would controlled media and the Famous But Incompetent authorities withhold it from the American public?
…Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming. A reminder: the US has the #1 most expensive healthcare system in the world, yet we rank roughly #42 in life expectancy. United is the [indecipherable] largest company in the US by market cap, behind only Apple, Google, Walmart. It has grown and grown, but as our life expectancy? No, the reality is, these [indecipherable] have simply gotten too powerful, and they continue to abuse our country for immense profit because the American public has allwed them to get away with it…
Not racial, but quoted for truth.
There is no justification for Luigi’s deed. Shooting someone in the back is murder in cold blood. If he is convicted by the court, he deserves the death penalty. I don’t care about his so-called “manifesto”. Nothing justifies such a crime.
kolokol: December 12, 2024 There is no justification for Luigi’s deed. Shooting someone in the back is murder in cold blood. If he is convicted by the court, he deserves the death penalty. I don’t care about his so-called “manifesto”. Nothing justifies such a crime.
—
Luigi strikes me as an honorable man who, right or wrong, took up arms in his own way against what he sees as a terminally corrupt System. He understands the power of the deed. You think you do but you do not.
Would his assassination of the fat cat United Health Care CEO have been justified had he asked him to turn around first so he could eyeball his assassin? You watch too many movies. You would not like William Pierce’s second novel, Hunter, the theme of which is this:
How should an honorable man confront evil. Should he ignore it, with the excuse that it is not his responsibility? Should he ally himself with the evil, because that’s where the “smart money” is? Or should he take up arms against it and fight it with all his strength and without regard for personal consequences, even if he must fight it alone?
This might become one of the Trials of the Century. I can’t remember the last time the media was so soft on a murder suspect, including previewing various defense strategies (studly guy who couldn’t have sex due to back pain, interviews with friends saying what a good guy he was, insinuations of depression). The prosecution will no doubt show all the footage of him not appearing to be limping in back pain. And at the same time Amazon and ebay can’t keep up with removing listings for shirts and other merchandise supporting him. The McDonalds he was arrested at has been bombed with negative reviews, saying the place was infested with ‘rats’. People from the left and right are enamored with him looking for opportunity to springboard their various platforms (ex. convert US health care into something like the UK NHS… for which Americans will hate the long waits, restrictions on seeing specialists, and cost cutting set by the government rather than the insurance company… plus Mangioni was rich and could have afforded whatever was possible). Anyhow, there will be a new CEO picked from many wannabees, just one with better security as part of his mega compensation package.
I agree with the observation in Wired that Luigi trafficked in forbidden ideas that used to only be allowed in 4-chan or places like here, but now the general public are discussing them. So that’s why this is a relevant topic. He’s a true millennial having given the Ted Kaczynski Unibomber Manifesto a 4 star review on GoodReads. Considering the context of all that, I would think the reviews should either be 5 stars or zero stars.
J Webb: December 12, 2024 This might become one of the Trials of the Century. I can’t remember the last time the media was [sic] so soft on a murder suspect…
—
The most memorable was O.J., thanks to being televised. Hopefully Luigi will request a jury trial and his defense team will seat a jury that is loaded with his peers. The murderer O.J. walked because his jury was mostly his racial peers who more or less invoked jury nullification.
For the youngsters who weren’t around 30 years ago to enjoy that spectacle, Dr. Pierce provides an excellent overview, here: The End of Justice in America: Lessons of the Simpson Trial | National Vanguard
…[L]ook at the Simpson trial itself, completely aside from the unjust verdict: the trial, up to the time the case went to the jury, certainly wasn’t anything that a White American could be proud of. It was hardly even a trial; it was a multicultural circus, a long-running soap opera made for television.
It was a paradigm of multiculturalism and trendiness: We had a Japanese judge married to a White woman who is a police captain. We had a prosecution team consisting of a Black male and a Jewess currently being divorced by a White man. We had a defense team which, with the exception of F. Lee Bailey, was entirely Jewish and Black. We had a Black defendant who likes to run with White women — and beat them up. We had one Jewish murder victim and one White female victim who had been raised by her liberal parents to couple with Blacks. We had a racially mixed but mostly Black jury. And the whole thing seems to have been run more for the benefit of the television networks than for the sake of justice.
Can any White person seeking justice in the courts or accused of a crime by the government have faith that justice will be done for him in such a circus setting?
I think not.
Can the public realistically hope to be protected from murderers and other criminals — especially if those criminals are rich and Black — by such a system?
I think not.
Imagine that you have to walk into such a courtroom as a defendant. Imagine that you are charged by the government with being Politically Incorrect — with, say, failing to rent an apartment to a pair of homosexuals or to hire someone with AIDS — or, perhaps, daring to defend yourself against an armed Black assailant. Do you believe that you’ll get a fair trial?
I think you’ll agree with me that you almost certainly will not.
How Did This Happen to our Justice System?
The sad truth is that we let it happen. Remember, it didn’t happen overnight. The O.J. Simpson verdict may have burst upon the consciousness of the public like a thunderbolt, but the subversion and wrecking of our American justice system have been going on quietly for decades. And we didn’t oppose it. Some of us wanted to be trendy and fashionable, and so we went along with the multiculturalism. Some of us were cowards. We knew what was happening was wrong, but we were afraid to say so: we were afraid of being called racists and anti-Semites. And many of us were just indifferent to what was happening: we were too selfish to get involved. And so, we let America’s enemies destroy our justice system. We let them destroy the only shield we had against governmental tyranny on the one hand and mob rule on the other hand: our only shield — and now it’s gone.
We didn’t stand up for our honest, decent White policemen, for our racially conscious White policemen like Detective Mark Fuhrman, who, God bless him, fought the multicultural terror and anarchy in the streets in the only way he knew, without any support from the politicians and the bureaucrats. He may have been a little rough in his methods sometimes, but he knew the nature of the beast he was fighting. He knew that if we don’t destroy it, it surely will destroy us.
We let the politicians and the bureaucrats follow the lead of the controlled media and weed out the racially conscious White policemen and replace them with Politically Correct trendies, who collaborate with the multicultural terrorists instead of fighting them. The same thing has happened in the courts that has happened in the police departments around the country. The honest, no-nonsense judges have been replaced by media-conscious trendies like Lance Ito.
During her closing argument the Jewish prosecutor in the Simpson trial, Marcia Clark, said that we all wish that there were no one like Mark Fuhrman on this planet. Do you remember that? When I heard her say that, it really infuriated me. I suspect that many of you who also heard her say that thought at the time, as I did, that, no, we are happy to share this planet with Detective Mark Fuhrman. Instead, we will welcome the day when there are no longer any Marcia Clarks, or people of her type, on this planet.
So how will we reach that day? How will we oppose the multiculturalists who have destroyed our justice system — and much else in our country? How will we fight them? How will we reclaim this planet for our people? How will we take it away from her people and undo the damage they’ve done?
Ultimately, we’ll have to fight them the same way our forefathers fought King George. But we have much fighting of another kind to do before then. We have to wake up millions of our fellow citizens who have been indifferent to what’s been happening in this country for the past 50 years, and we have to pound some sense into their heads. Maybe we can’t change the fact of their selfishness, but we can make them understand that it’s their country which is being destroyed. It’s their heritage and their future. And as for the millions who are too shortsighted to care about their future or their heritage, we must make them realize that the danger to them of a failed justice system is here and now, not just in the future. The O.J. Simpson trial was real. The George Loeb trial was real. I didn’t invent them. The government did. The multiculturalists did. But we have to fight them…
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.