Klaus Schwab looking like a Bond villain.
4,019 words
Part 2 available here and Part 3 here.
On July 9, 2023, a hiker stumbled upon the decomposing remains of a teenage boy at a campsite in Gunnison National Forest, Colorado. The hiker alerted the authorities who found two additional corpses belonging to middle-aged women in a tent at the campsite. All three bodies were severely underweight, and their cause of death was determined to have been starvation. The three were estimated to have already been dead for several months at the time of their discovery.
After an investigation, the deceased were identified as 42-year-old Rebecca Vance, her 14-year-old son Tallon, and her 41-year-old sister Christine. The three of them had left their home in Colorado Springs on August 1, 2022, with the intention of living an off-the-grid lifestyle. During the Covid pandemic, the sisters had become convinced that ongoing events in the world at the time were being orchestrated by the World Economic Forum, led by Klaus Schwab, in order to institute the Great Reset which would merge man with machine. They were under the impression that the only way to escape from the impending tyranny was to isolate themselves deep in the wilderness where no one could find them and that their time to do so was running out.
The Vance sisters’ plan was to live off the land by growing their own food, building their own shelter, and making their own provisions such as clothes and footwear. Neither had any outdoor survival experience, but they believed watching several YouTube videos in preparation would have sufficed. They were found to have been living in an $80 nylon tent from Walmart with a simple tarp on the ground underneath. Their provisions included granola bars, canned stew, Vienna sausages, and ramen noodles. The trio had attempted to build a shelter, but it amounted to nothing more than a few logs stacked four feet high over a hole they had dug. They had brought seeds for carrots and potatoes but didn’t realize that they would need to have been planted in adequate soil during the correct season to grow.
Rebecca and Christine Vance could be described as conspiracy theorists. However, they went far beyond simply believing that powerful and influential people occasionally engage in dishonest behavior in pursuit of ulterior ends. Conspiracism was the very foundation of their understanding of the world. They believed that every single event happening in the world was being meticulously choreographed by malevolent forces. They were so convinced of this that they thought a course of action which resulted in them starving to death in a flimsy tent lost in the freezing forests of Colorado was a good idea. While the foolhardiness of the Vance family might be an extreme example, this mindset which led to their demise has become endemic in recent years.
Before I explain the folly of such a worldview, I first need to define what I mean by “conspiracy,” “conspiracy theory,” and “conspiracism.” “Conspiracy” means a group of people colluding for unlawful or harmful means. “Conspiracy theory” is the belief that powerful and influential people have deceptively conspired to orchestrate events in order to carry out an ulterior agenda. “Conspiracism” on the other hand, is not simply the belief in a conspiracy theory. It is a worldview centralized upon conspiracies, viewing them as the main driving force behind events unfolding in the past, present, and future.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The Year America Died here.
Conspiracy theories are not a new phenomenon, but I would attribute the rapid spread of conspiracy theories and conspiracism as a worldview to two major factors. The first is the rise of the internet. The internet has made information far more accessible and made its dissemination far easier than ever before, giving greatly increased exposure to alternative explanations for world events. The second is the dishonesty and corruption of the political, cultural, and educational establishment in the West. As living standards in Western countries have declined and the various narratives advanced by the mainstream have failed to reflect observable reality, the credibility of once-prestigious institutions has significantly diminished in the eyes of the public. Inevitably, more and more people today are seeking alternative explanations.
The phrase “conspiracy theory” has taken on negative connotations within the mainstream over the past few decades. It now conjures images of a paranoid schizophrenic wearing a tinfoil hat shrieking about the hidden reign of lizardmen overlords. However, I consider the concept of a “conspiracy theory” to be neutral. I accept that the powerful engage in conspiracies quite regularly and I’m open to the idea that a number of conspiracy theories are likely true. I will also add that a degree of skepticism of authority is always healthy, and as a critic of the ruling consensus of the present day, it is imperative that the establishment is questioned.
The issue is not with questioning authority or even believing in a number of conspiracy theories. The problem arises when one adopts conspiracism as the prism through which they attempt to conceptualize the entire world. While I recognize why such a mindset has become so common in the present era, I will posit that conspiracism is neither an accurate way to understand the world, nor useful for any cause which its adherents hope to advance.
The first flaw with conspiracism as a lens through which to understand world events is that it assumes an impossible level of foresight among influential individuals. A grand conspiracy spanning a century or more, masterminding historical events as a roadmap to reach a specific desired end goal would be impossible due to the unpredictability of how history plays out. Any century-long step-by-step plan would be made moot within a few short years by the rapid and unforeseeable changes in circumstances.
For example, no one in 1900 would have thought that within 20 years, the German, Austro-Hungarian, Russian, and Ottoman Empires all would’ve ceased to exist. The idea that Europe would be divided into a liberal democratic versus communist block 50 years later during the Cold War, then united under the liberal democratic European Union 100 years later would’ve been unimaginable for someone in 1900. No one possibly could’ve predicted that, much less, made a plan for bringing about these radically different realities.
Even more unpredictable than the effect of political developments is the effect which the development of technology has on the historical process. For example, before the invention of the steam engine, it would have been impossible for a conspiracy to plan out in advance historical events which were to take place after it was invented. No conspiracy from decades ago could possibly have factored in the enormous impact that the internet would have on society and plan out historical events in the internet age accordingly. The full implications of new technology are never fully understood until after said technology is adopted.
The idea that advances in technology were planned out is clearly false due to the fact that new technologies always undergo a wild west period before they are fully implemented and regulated. The internet was much less regulated as recently as a decade ago because its full implications on society hadn’t yet been realized. AI is currently undergoing somewhat of a wild west period because its widespread usage is new and we haven’t yet figured out how to grapple with it. Looking back a century, you can see how at the beginning of the First World War, it took trial and error in battle to fully understand the new reality of mechanized warfare. The development of technology has an enormous impact on how historical events play out, yet that impact is always unpredictable.
The second major failing of conspiracism as an explanation for historical and current events is that it assumes an impossible level of coordination. Influential individuals have varying interests which constantly conflict with one another. Conspiracy can’t be the overarching driving force behind the historical process because it would be impossible to get the entirety of a ruling elite on board with a grand conspiracy due to the radically divergent agendas elites wish to pursue. The way history and current events play out is determined by which competing elite-driven agendas win out over the others, not a preplanned roadmap.
For example, a member of the elite class whose fortune was built on the oil industry has conflicting interests with another elite who has invested in the sustainable development agenda. They each have vested interests in society going in different directions. Which one gets their way will depend on who is able to lobby for their desired outcome more effectively. The two are in conflict with each other. The outcome couldn’t have been predetermined by a conspiracy formulated years prior because there are always influential actors who desire contradictory outcomes.
Furthermore, for every agenda which did succeed, there were many extremely powerful and influential individuals throughout history whose ambitions never materialized. Cecil Rhodes’ Imperial Federation, Vladimir Lenin’s worldwide Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Adolf Hitler’s Greater German Reich, and Benito Mussolini’s revival of the Roman Empire never ended up becoming a reality. A considerable amount of elite-backed effort was put into these aspirations, but they weren’t successfully brought about. All historic outcomes were realized in competition with alternative potential outcomes desired by unsuccessful factions.
If conspiracism is an inaccurate way to understand the world, how can we explain the appearance of pre-planning and coordination in the realization of historical and present-day events? While various conspiracies do occur, the main driving force behind broader trends in the historical process is not a grand conspiracy, but shared outlook among elites. Like-minded people tend to form similar opinions on the world, reach the same conclusions, and decide upon the same courses of action. Influential individuals who share loyalties, a worldview, and a vision for the future will inevitably work towards the same ends, whether they are actively conspiring with one another or not.
This can be facilitated without formal coordination. All that is necessary for this to take place is an ideological consensus among the ruling class. By attending the same prestigious universities, consuming media from the same sources, and belonging to the same elite social cliques, a consensus is established which informs the agendas which the majority of elites will tend to favor. Moreover, while elite interests are never uniform, they usually overlap among those functioning under the same consensus, meaning they have an interest in pursuing the same agendas. In a sense, this constitutes elites conspiring with one another, though it doesn’t suggest pre-planning or that they act as a monolith as conspiracists believe.
I’m now going to go over several commonly held positions in my sphere of politics which I also subscribe to and explain why this framing is a more accurate way to understand these issues than the conspiracist ones. The first is what is referred to as the Jewish Question. This is the theory that Jews, as a small minority, have a disproportionate amount of power in Western countries and use that power to benefit their own group interests to the detriment of the white majorities. They do this through advocating policies such as mass third world immigration, censorship, and affirmative action, promoting a universalist egalitarian worldview through media and education, and pushing unhealthy social norms. Simultaneously, most Jews lobby for supporting the State of Israel from Western countries, a country which has the opposite policies from those they advocate in the West.
In my view, this theory of the impact of Jewish influence is verifiably true. However, some attribute this phenomenon to a conspiracy outlined in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a plot by the Rothschild banking family dating back to the Napoleonic wars, or some other esoteric Jewish prophecies from thousands of years ago. A much more apt explanation for the Jewish Question is not a pre-planned and coordinated single centuries-long conspiracy, but simply the fact that Jews are highly ethnocentric. Kevin MacDonald posited in The Culture of Critique that their ethnocentrism is evolutionary, meaning they act collectively by their nature.
The outlook they share is that Jews are a distinct ethno-religious group with their own evolutionary group interest interests. Advancing those group interests are their highest priority and they do so in opposition to the group interests of the European-descended populations of the Western countries which they inhabit. Part of this disposition is also a shared belief in historic and present-day persecution of Jews at the hands of Europeans, which explains why their actions are informed by a deeply held ethnic resentment against the West. This shared outlook makes it such that the existence of an overarching conspiracy which they are all involved in isn’t necessary for Jews to work in unison with one another. It’s just something they do as a result of their disposition.
While the organized Jewish community is a highly coordinated political force, there also exists discoordination and disagreement among Jews as well. For example, Jews were among the most prominent proponents of communism with figures such as Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, and Rosa Luxemburg. Meanwhile, they were also among the leading intellectuals behind libertarianism including individuals such as Ayn Rand, Milton Freedman, and Murray Rothbard. The issue of Zionism and the State of Israel is also disputed among Jews. Jewish organizations such as AIPAC or the ADL are explicitly Zionist while an organization like George Soros’s Open Society Foundation is critical of Israel. Most Jews tend to be atheists, but others are devotedly religious Orthodox Jews.
It’s also not the case that their rise to power has followed a pre-planned roadmap seeing as many of the agendas they’ve advanced have failed and they’ve changed courses regularly. Jews were the most powerful group in the Soviet Union in the years immediately after the Russian Revolution, but eventually, the Soviet system turned against them and their power significantly declined in the later Soviet era. They played a more pivotal role than anyone in establishing the universalist egalitarian ideology of the Left in the postwar era. However, since October 2023, Israel and the Zionist lobby have come under immense scrutiny from the Left in the West on the basis of the exact same values which the organized Jewish community were the leading advocates of.
The unforeseeable advancement of technology has impacted the ebbs and flows of Jewish power as well. During the 20th century, their influence in mass media, particularly in the film industry, played a crucial part in the enormous political power they gained. The inventors of motion picture were not Jewish and had no connect to the organized Jewish community. A number of Jews merely saw an opportunity in film in the early 20th century and established Hollywood in the 1920s, which went on to become an enormously influential outlet under their control.
In the early 21st century, the organized Jewish community has come under immense scrutiny from both the Left and the Right for the first time in the postwar era due to the new technological reality created by the internet. The rise of social media and alternative media has broken their stranglehold on narrative control and given voice to widespread criticism of the power they wield in Western society and its effects. The beneficial impact of motion picture and the detrimental impact of the internet on the organized Jewish community was not planned out in advance. It was a result of individuals reacting to organically changing circumstances.
The next position I’ll look at is that of large-scale demographic shifts in Western countries, a process known as The Great Replacement. This is the idea that majority European and European-derived populations in Western countries are being gradually replaced by those of non-European ancestry as a result of mass immigration. The portion of the population made up of those of European descent is declining across the Western World. Below replacement birthrates combined with continued immigration will cause the white populations of these countries to decline and eventually disappear if current trends continue.
This trend of demographic replacement is clearly observable statistically and is a direct result of the deliberate policies of Western governments. However, many on the Right take the conspiracist belief that this process is a result of a century-old, preplanned conspiracy called the Kalergi Plan. The theory is that Richard Kalergi, a proponent of European integration who envisioned a future mixed human race, formulated this plan along with a group of mostly Jewish integrationists in the 1920s and these are the marching order of the present day.
Rather than The Great Replacement being planned out by Kalergi a century ago, I believe a more accurate explanation is that the worldview, which individuals like Kalergi subscribed to, became the elite consensus in the West in the years following WWII. As mentioned earlier, the organized Jewish community, whose power rose exponentially in the postwar era, push for mass immigration as a means of advancing their own ethnic interests. Simultaneously, gentile elites in the West adopted a universalist egalitarian worldview in the postwar era which resulted in them abandoning their ethnic loyalties and supporting mass immigration from the Third World.
With this as the ideological consensus in the West, the existence of a single coordinated and preplanned conspiracy like the Kalergi Plan isn’t really necessary. The elite class are of the belief that white ethnocentrism is immoral, that all people are interchangeable and that ancestry has no impact on human potential, and that the historic prosperity of the West was illegitimately gained at the expense of the rest of the world. As a result, they enact policies which are in accordance with this worldview such as mass immigration whether they are formally in a conspiracy with one another or not. There exist a great number of organizations which consciously promote this replacement agenda, but there isn’t a singular centralized node directing them all.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here
Disproving the conspiracist framing of this agenda is the existence of disunity on other issues among elites who hold the same views on the issue of race. For example, the epicenter of Jewish power is the United States, where they have been the most prominent advocates of mass immigration while also lobbying for supporting Israel. Meanwhile, there are very few Jews in the political class of many European countries such as Ireland or Sweden. The Zionist lobby is a lot less powerful in such countries which is why they have shown a greater support for Palestine. However, Sweden and Ireland still have large scale third-world immigration because their gentile elites believe in this same universalist egalitarian worldview. The disagreement is whether or not Israel should be beholden to these values or given an exception.
Further to that point, while Russia is waging a war in Ukraine and saber rattling back and forth with the rest of Europe, Putin holds very similar beliefs on the issue of race to Western countries. He supports multiculturalism, strongly opposes basing nationality on ancestry, has facilitated mass immigration to Russia from central Asia, and believes that the lack of prosperity of the “Global South” is a result of the West’s “racism” and “colonialism.” Putin clearly isn’t in a conspiracy with Western elites as they are at each other’s throats geopolitically, but he is carrying out his own Great Replacement because he holds a not-too-dissimilar worldview.
There is also a severe lack of foresight among elites facilitating the demographic transformation of the West. These countries are now facing a competence crisis created as a result of DEI policies predicated on the falsehoods of their egalitarian ideology. Amid rising geopolitical turmoil they are unable to motivate the populations of Western countries to commit to national defense seeing as they’ve deconstructed nationalism, the force which serves at the impetus for national defense among the masses.
Returning to the theme of the unpredictability of technological advancement, the arrival of increased automation will make the third-world masses which have been imported into the West economically obsolete and an even bigger burden. The impacts of demographic shifts have been detrimental from the perspective of the ruling class, who have no coherent idea how to deal with these consequences in the future. The elites causing demographic replacement are acting upon short-sighted ethnic resentment or egalitarian delusions, not a well-thought-out scheme.
The third theory I’ll talk about is one which revolves around the World Economic Forum and what was called the Great Reset. The conspiracist notion is that the WEF is an elite globalist circle led by Klaus Schwab (before his retirement) which has infiltrated governments around the world with the goal of orchestrating world events towards an international technocratic new world order. A great number of the most influential people in the world are in fact associated with the WEF. However, the conspiracist framing of Klaus Schwab as some kind of James Bond villain and the WEF as something akin to SPECTRE is an incorrect way to understand the organization and the actions of the individuals who congregate at Davos each year.
The WEF is not a centralized global conspiracy with agents controlling the governments of the world. It’s just a forum where world leaders congregate and discuss various issues which they consider important. Those who attend Davos have a common technocratic managerial ideology and an internationalist cosmopolitan outlook which is why they pursue similar policies in countries in which they hold positions of power. However, the WEF isn’t dictating the policies for them to implement in their respective countries. It is only one of many outlets which influences the decisions made by the leaders who attend.
The conspiracist framing of the WEF and a global conspiracy fails in the same way conspiracism always does. First of all, if Klaus Schawb really were a Bond villain with ambitions of global domination, why would he have retired from his chairmanship of the WEF? The association world leaders have with the organization are pretty loose. Simply attending an event once a year or being given an honorific title does not mean that such individuals are devoted servants of the WEF as if they’re agents of SPECTRE. Those who interact with the organization are likely influenced by it, but they still have their own agency and often disagree with each other.
One agenda which conspiracists like to portray the WEF as the grandmasters of is Covid. A similar framework of policies was implemented worldwide during the Covid pandemic leading some to believe that it was all being choreographed by one centralized force. A more likely explanation is that the policies of governments around the world were simply influenced by organizations like the WHO, which share a great deal of overlap with the WEF and those who attend their annual meetings at Davos.
Countries which are in conflict with each other geopolitically such as Israel and Iran pursued similar Covid policies. They weren’t following the dictates of a centralized authority, but rather a general outline. Conspiracists often claim that digital IDs are part of a diabolical plot for global technocratic domination out of the mind of Klaus Schwab. In reality, all governments have an incentive to implement digital IDs independent of one another in that they provide increased control. A central grand conspiracy isn’t necessary for them to pursue a digital surveillance grid on their own.
It’s also incorrect to believe the WEF are masterminding world events to reach desired internationalist ends seeing as many recent developments have not been conducive to such goals. The geopolitical strife of the past five years has derailed many of the global projects which the WEF supports. There is an acknowledgement among world leaders that the so-called “rules-based international order” is coming to an end. Some governments have rolled back climate change policies due to their impracticality when implemented. The feasibility of the technocratic managerial grid they envision for the future runs in contradiction to their egalitarian beliefs on the issue of race and the competency crisis which these ideas have created. The Davos crowd have a vision for what they want for the future, but their plans to reach such an end state are highly flawed.
28 comments
Putin clearly isn’t in a conspiracy with Western elites as they are at each other’s throats geopolitically
As I have already written elsewhere, Putin and Russia are not anti-globalist. They are simply another kind of globalists. The Western globalism is Jewish-Anglosaxon, while Russian one is Asian, where the Chinese play main role.
Great article! It is the jews, and I will always believe it is the jews. 🙃
Yes, the hyper-conspiracy thinking is a path to nowhere.
Author may just be reflecting these people’s views, wonder if a droplet of this conspiracism has even managed slip its way into this article. Count Kalergi, as much a figure of deserved contempt as he is, becoming an emblem of a lot of these problems, wasn’t a Jew himself.
And that’s a deep part of their belief. Everyone is a Jew, including Iran’s religious leaders, which are actually secret Jews playing a role in a Jewish script. It’s a very bizarre understanding of the world..
Having said that, it’s not entirely clear to me how much European elites believe in diversity and interchangeability vs how much they are afraid to disagree with it. Absent the three loaded guns of: the destruction of Germany after WWII, Jewish lobbying, and then acquired economic dependency on immigration, I wonder if their views would be quite as unified. That said, absolutely these cosmopolitan elites also seek a barrier between them and their own masses. Diversity provides that barrier and is used to police the masses, to protect the 0.1%. In that sense they absolutely believe in it.
Would also just ask much Putin believes the global south is poor because of Western racism, rather than it’s something useful to say as a rhetorical weapon.
No question though, covid sent this stuff into overdrive. The information threshold was bad before and then went insane afterwards. What you can say is, with aspects of it, it demonstrated how coalesced power had become and it was shock to many of our people it could just be rolled out that way. But this stuff had been forming behind the scenes for years, while people, ironically, were focused on more titillating conspiracies.
There is a ‘conspiracy’ if you want to call it that – I mean it’s a trend, but there’s a big effort to make it happen, to gather power and make it more and more unaccountable and remote and difficult to uproot.
I guess the WEF is one part of that sort of thing. It’s bit like the Trilateral Commission or Bilderberg.
There’s an element of truth in Epstein’s strange interview. He said something like, “Politicians are temporary and don’t understand money, therefore businessmen and investors need to take a stronger hand in getting a grip on the world’s problems”. That view is not something Epstein invented. It’s been around for ages.
Countries which are in conflict with each other geopolitically such as Israel and Iran pursued similar Covid policies.
Right and that’s lost on these types. They have this myopic America-decides-everything view of the world. Fauci did this, Fauci said that, therefore….
But it’s not how the world understood covid.
“Politicians are temporary and don’t understand money, therefore businessmen and investors need to take a stronger hand in getting a grip on the world’s problems”.
If any race understands money, it is the jews. Cryptic comments like these, and the fact that everything redounds to the benefit of jews, only reinforces my belief that it is the jews. 🙃
European elites believe in diversity and interchangeability vs how much they are afraid to disagree with it
Here the economics matter. The white people are considered as useless eaters from economical point of view, they eat too much, so they have to get better salaries, it reflects on the prices, and so the existence of the white people as labor is not economically profitable. The elites bring non-Whites simply to spare money, not to annihilate white peoples.
Agree basically. Good article. The only transgenerational conspiracies or wide conspiracies that I give credence to have to do with that one group, and even then it’s not from some secret codex somewhere, it’s just sort of an emergent genetic behavior. And many times the mainstream narrative is as useful politically as the conspiracy narrative. For example, I’m very sympathetic to different forms of 911 truth, but really the simple idea that disgruntled Arabs committed it is more useful politically to us. Because if it could be proved that it was really some sort of Cobra Commander figure who did it all, then that would really say that mass immigration was OK and it had nothing to do with our actions in the Middle East.
On the other hand I do believe in mandatory Covid vaccination and mask enforcement. I still wear a mask in public. The conspiracy is the anti-VAX and ivermectin loons!
Kalergi was not a Jew, he was half-Austrian, and half-Japanese.
Yet another reason to be against miscegenation.
This article gets it right enough. However, I suspect conspiracism is the normal way some people think. It’s not something they can turn off.
Unfortunately, a lot of those people drift towards WN.
““Conspiracism” on the other hand, is not simply the belief in a conspiracy theory. It is a worldview centralized upon conspiracies, viewing them as the main driving force behind events unfolding in the past, present, and future”
Your distinctions between criminal conspiracy, conspiracy theories, and conspiracism as worldview, are pretty much irrelevant.
What we should say is war is the “main driving force behind events unfolding in the past, present, and future.”
That’s not a conspiracy theory.
War is the father and king of us all. Always has been, is now, always will be. It’s not what you believe on this unstable, endless war planet, but what you can defend. Your argument just distracts us from what we should be focusing on: Militarism.
Break that down into a worldview and you’ll be closer to the truth.
Watch out for this bad ass.
Excellent article. Logical and analytical thinking, as well as how to evaluate evidence in general, is crucial for anyone involved in legal matters, historical research, etc. White Nationalists especially should be well versed in such things.
🙂
“Conspiracism” is not inherently bad and may be useful and even healthy if properly channeled by the right forces.
The “paranoid style” in American politics no doubt emerges because American society is profoundly dishonest and constructed upon a pyramid of elaborate lies and propaganda. The legitimacy of its institutions rests on the myth of “democracy” and “meritocracy,” when in fact it is one of the most profoundly oligarchic, elitist, anti-populist, nepotistic, and corrupt states in human history. People are constantly lied to about the nature of their system and then feel drawn to conspiracies, because conspiracy is the only way to rationalize the stark disconnect between the way people are told the world works and the way they instinctually feel and see that the world functions in practice.
While conspiratorial thinking can be extremely counterproductive, it can be harnessed if redirected by the right movement or leadership. While it is not true that the WEF is secretly pulling the strings around the world, the basic instinct behind this theory – i.e., that the world is governed by elites who are pursuing specific agendas contrary to the interests of most people – is correct. Perhaps the theory is analytically flawed. It’s backwards to state that the WEF, CFR, Trilateral Commission, etc. “run the world” – rather, as the Washington Post clarifies, the Trilateral Commission is “a club for people who run the world anyway.” But the instinct is correct. All the corporate and billionaire members of these organizations are “power elites” who run the world, and they use these organizations as policy-planning networks to coordinate and push agendas as an organized capitalist ruling class. So the WEF doesn’t “run the world” and many of the conspiracies associated with the idea are ridiculous and outlandish, but the idea that Schwab is manipulating world governments behind the scenes is way closer to the truth than “democracy”, “meritocracy,” “equal opportunity,” “the American dream,” etc.
Our Neolithic brains can’t grasp all the subtleties of complex sociological phenomenon in our radically complex modern world, so many try to comprehend the world through simplistic conspiracies. However, the essential instinct behind the “paranoid style” is correct and even healthy, because it’s a primal gut reaction against our disgusting parasitic ruling class and can be tremendously potent if harnessed by the right movement. NSDAP antisemitic propaganda about Jewish financial power was crude, primitive, “conspiratorial,” but it was also effective and it worked
“Conspiracism” is not inherently bad and may be useful and even healthy if properly channeled by the right forces.
I disagree, this is really just “the One Ring used for good” fallacy demoralized fringe Rightists tends to invoke when frustrated with enemy victories. Those arguments often revolve around standing with nutjobs and cranks, because “the Left protects theirs!” or embracing tactical nihilism.
A rise in conspiratorial thinking does signify a loss of trust and a recognition that powerful interest groups exert disproportionate influence on politics. It is also true that it allows to “rationalize the stark disconnect between the way people are told the world works and the way they instinctually feel and see that the world functions in practice.”- as You put it. The problem is people WANT to believe in the System. The injuries and insults are what make them think they’re being denied fairness by some nefarious forces. In the end, despite egalitarian lies, people believe in an ordered, hierarchical reality. There is the peasant and the “milord” above him who provides protection and other benefits in exchange for tribute. Sometimes however, the milord appears to be taking more than he should and that’s when the fanciful ideas start to hatch and the “wicked noble” tropes come from.
The paranoid and conspiratorial thinking however take it further and create a new alternate reality with the theorists as one of the “player characters” (as opposed to the “sheep/NPCS”). This is often where the main character syndrome and persecutory delusion start manifesting along with the associated traits, attracting very specific individuals and creating very specific environments. To think one could harness such people for good is a delusion. Instead the conspiracy merchants proliferate, purity spiraling becomes unrestrained and narcissist spats create frictions. Conspiracists are parasites at their core (just like the evil “Them” they proclaim to fight) who feed on their audiences and any groups stupid enough to accommodate them.
However, the essential instinct behind the “paranoid style” is correct and even healthy
Spreading mistrust towards the System (through FUD or other tactics) is part of every revolutionary movement however, putting the genie back in the bottle is then usually resolved through mass terror as there is no trust to build from after the revolution. Russian peasantry and Bolshevik authorities post-Civil War are a good example. Commissars responsible for grain collection did not need to lie to themselves about peasants hiding food, because that’s what often happened during the Civil War as wandering armies didn’t like offering any hard currency in exchange for food (gold was for arms purchases). Combine fundamental distrust between the state and the farmers with unrealistic economic projections and planning failures to get a recipe for a famine.
NSDAP antisemitic propaganda about Jewish financial power was crude, primitive, “conspiratorial,” but it was also effective and it worked
Somehow I doubt this was the crucial factor that delivered the electoral success or the alliance with the Weimar elites. Speaking of German conspiracies, I wonder how well the Dolchstoßlegende did for the honest appraisal of the German Army’s performance in the Great War. It certainly helped characters like von Hindenburg and Ludendorff avoid post-war scrutiny. Shame how it all ended for Germans though.
The German Army’s performance in WWI was actually quite good.
According to the military historian and U.S. Army statistician Col. Trevor N. Dupuy, on average it took 3 or sometimes 4 Allied soliders to fight 2 Germans to a standstill.
German Army performance in WWII was even better, as were elite units like the first few Waffen-SS divisions and the Luftwaffe’s Hermann Göring Panzer Division (originally paratroops).
Hitler noted in Mein Kampf that the criticism of Gen. Erich Ludendorff was curious when he above all others nearly saved the situation at the end with his unprecedented tactical victories on the Western Front in the Spring of 1918.
Where offensive progress on the Western Front was usually measured in yards, German Sturmtruppen during the Ludendorff offensives had advanced as much as forty miles and had come close to splitting the frontline junction between the French and British forces, which would have forced an Allied retreat to protect Paris, and one in the other direction to protect the Channel Ports.
The Germans actually faced the same bifurcation dilemma in 1940 when the Panzers actually did break through and top German generals called upon Hitler to delay the Panzers for rest and repair while the British waited on the beach at Dunkirk and the French retreated to defend Paris.
Hitler agreed to this pause and tried to turn it into a diplomatic overture to the British, but it flopped since Churchill wanted war at any cost, and the BEF was “miraculously” able to evacuate their personnel minus their equipment. Churchill also knew that the German Navy in WWII was too weak to support a German invasion of the British Isles, and that this was never seriously contemplated by them anyway.
Also, I would note that had Field Marshal von Hindenburg not had the stunning 1914 victory against the “Russian steamroller” at Tannenberg, the World War might have ended sooner at Germany’s expense.
Hindenburg’s Dolchstoßlegende (stab-in-the-back myth) contains a great deal of truth, unless one interprets it to mean that Germany would have otherwise won the war. That is basically a straw-man argument.
In fact, Germany losing the Great War was virtually certain once the United States entered it officially in early 1917. However, the Russians leaving the World War for a separate peace with the Germans at Brest-Litovsk meant that Germany still had a chance to negotiate a favorable peace with the West, and Ludendorff’s Spring, 1918 offensives were enormous tactical successes ─ though they did not roll up the Western Front or even separate the Allied armies, which came very close to happening. This was when British Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig gave his famous “backs to the wall” speech (LINK).
By the Autumn of 1918, Ludendorff believed that the war could no longer be won by military means. However, Germany still had many diplomatic cards to play, namely that a huge amount of Allied territory was still in defiant German hands.
President Wilson’s Fourteen Points effectively demanded Unconditional Surrender because, before the Allies would even negotiate an Armistice or a final peace treaty, the Germans would need the monarchy to abdicate and for the unbeaten German army to completely demobilize and to evacuate occupied Allied territory in shame.
When the new Republican rulers complied, they dutifully surrendered all of their future diplomatic leverage at Versailles ─ but they were more interested in International Law, global plutocracy, and Bolshevism than in any German national interests anyway.
Germany might as well have been “stabbed in the back.”
Plus, the Allies retained their naval starvation blockade after the Armistice for many months until the Versailles Diktat was signed in June 1919, which demanded accepting War Guilt as an ideology, and its obvious corollary, the unspecified and open-ended Reparations demanded.
American Nationalists in the Senate ─ derisively called Isolationists ─ who blocked the ratification of the Versailles Treaty and Wilson’s pet project, the League of Nations, clearly understood the implications of a peace based upon destroying a nation’s economy in perpetuity. If nations are forced to become economic colonies for the sake of peace and to interact with the world, it makes little sense to keep them in ruin. To sow hatred does not sow peace.
Early on there were serious efforts to clearly delineate and to refinance German Reparations into something more manageable with the Dawes Plan (1924) and the Young Plan (1929) that might get the German War Debt paid off before the 21st Century, but all this became moot with the international stock market crash of 1929.
In fact, in spite of President Wilson pretending to keep the United States out of the World War, it was almost obligated to enter it against Germany anyway because of the real danger that the Allies might default on their massive American war debts. German “Reparations” payments actually enabled the Allies to pay their Wall Street loans.
Funny that the Jews were both for and against the Germans until the Bolshies took over the hated Tsarist Russian Empire and signed a separate peace with the Germans ─ and then they were all “stabbing” for a German defeat.
🙂
I agree with the basic tenet that there’s too much conspiracy mongering in our circles, especially when it’s not even necessary to make a point. I can’t stand hearing people go on about 5g nanobot vaccines, mudfloods, and so on.
That does not mean, however, that conspiracies do not happen and that coordination of narratives across most of the mass media does not frequently happen. Most of the mass media and social media after all is in the hands of just a few large companies, most of them in the hands of Jews or Judeophiles (like Elon Musk, Rupert Murdoch etc.) which in turn are heavily influenced by an even smaller number of investment companies like BlackRock. Under these conditions, a media-wide conspiracy only takes about a dozen people with similar backgrounds and interests to agree on something, and none of them live in the shadows, you can look them all up on Wikipedia.
In fact, many of the more ridiculous conspiracy theories are deliberately promoted by Jews and intelligence agencies for various political ends, including some anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.
Not a very convincing point because the leadership cadres of the US, Ukraine and Russia are all heavily Jewish, with both Trump’s and Putin’s entourage enjoying strong ties to Chabad, and the Ukraine war is both furthering Jewish ethnic interests (killing off White soldiers on both sides and enabling BlacRock to buy up Ukraine) as well as playing into their prophecies (Edom <-> Ishmael divide with Russia paradoxically on the side of Ishmael as explained by the Vilna Gaon, NATO emptying its stockpiles so Europe can eventually be steamrolled by China as described in Zohar Shemot 32A).
I don’t know much about Ireland, but Sweden’s media is in fact very Jew-heavy. Also, there are 0 Jews (aside maybe from a few cryptos) in the Vatican, yet somehow the Catholic Church never openly talks about the very obvious and pressing issue of near-total Jewish control of the media in the West. Same goes for most gentile-owned media in European countries. The reason they shy away from such an urgent topic is that Jews have levers of control that go far beyond direct overrepresentation in some government bodies.
The version of the Protocols that has come down to us was heavily falsified by the Christian fanatic Sergei Nilus, who among other things removed references to the Old Testament. An Italian linguist whose name escapes me right now has reconstructed the original publication, which was written in a mix of Russian and Ukrainian and serialized in a newspaper. I haven’t read this reconstruction and therefore can’t say anything meaningful about the veracity of the original document, but I have a hunch that neither can you.
> a plot by the Rothschild banking family dating back to the Napoleonic wars, or some other esoteric Jewish prophecies from thousands of years ago
Lumping these together betrays a level of ignorance on the subjects of Judaism, Jewish history and Israeli politics that frankly disqualifies you from writing on the merit of Jewish conspiracy theories. Netanyahu, Naftali Bennett and even the “moderate” Yair Lapid have all publicly affirmed that the goal of their respective parties is the fulfillment of the Jewish Messianic prophecies.
Hidden beneath various levels of obfuscation, Jewish religious literature contains long-term goal statements as well as psychoanalytic profiles of their enemies (us), stratagems and tactics to be employed to achieve those goals. Acknowledging this fact does not imply that all of Judaism is run by a monolithic group of conspirators that meets in underground synagogues, or that every detail of their conduct was planned when the Torah was written.
To the contrary, it recognizes the reality that for 2,000 years the Jewish nation’s intellectual elite did not have the luxury of secure archives beyond the reach of their enemies and simply employed the same method we use today when we want to communicate securely on a public medium like the internet: encryption and obfuscation. Jewish plans were continually discussed, scratched and refined by luminaries like Rashi, Isaac Luria, the Gaon of Vilna and Menachem Mendel Schneerson, and they did so in language that was inaccessible to Gentiles, because as the Zohar states with regard to the Scapegoat ritual, “if the Goyim knew what this is really about, they would not let Israel live for even a single day.”
Before publishing part 2 and 3 of your article, I recommend reading up at the very least on the influence Jewish religious figures like [Shabbatai Zvi](https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Heretic+of+the+month:+Shabbetai+Tzvi.-a0162697150), [Jacob Frank](https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Heretic+of+the+month%3a+Jacob+Frank.-a0162697168) and the [Vilna Gaon](https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/interviews-and-profiles/did-the-vilna-gaons-students-pave-the-way-for-modern-israel/2020/10/07/) had on the eventual founding of the state of Israel, including through their descendants (like Netanyahu’s family who are descendants of the Vilna Gaon) and followers (like the Dönmeh who overthrew the Ottoman Empire and the Frankist Louis Brandeis who was instrumental to Zionist interests during WW1). On this topic I recommend the book “Forbidden History of the Armenian Holocaust” by Christopher Jon Bjerknes, and for a good lesson on how to decipher Jewish religious literature there’s [Beware the World to Come](https://cjbbooks.com/books/) by the same author, as well as his [interviews with Adam Green](https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1?view=content&search=bjerknes&sort=old). CJB is too much of a conspiracist for my tastes, mind you, but that does not diminish the amount of real, verifiable documents he has dug up.
Dear Julian,
Your astute comment captures my own response to this article PERFECTLY. While we can dismiss certain conspiracies (e.g., nanobots) as demonstrably ridiculous, the larger conspiracies against (and within) Western civilization are thousands of years in the making. I was so relieved that someone had the courage to say this, because while I agree with much of the article, I have profound misgivings about it as well for exactly the reasons you elucidate. Weirdly, I’ve found that it has become very challenging to get others in the “alternative right” (to the extent that’s even a viable thing) to understand the realities you document so well. Judaism has never been a neutral force, but rather the most insidious and nefarious force the world has ever seen. If you’re inclined to communicate more about this, please feel free to email me: brandonbishop672 AT gmail DOT com. I would love to discuss some of the links you posted.
All the very best,
Brandon
If you’re right, we may as well give up. We don’t stand a chance, and we never did.
Why the fatalistic attitude? Your perspective is why the West is in such bad shape. Had society stood up to the PTB over time, we wouldn’t be here.
I’m saying your attitude is fatalistic. But perhaps I’ve misunderstood.
The conspiracy of Lenin’s revolutionaries with the German intelligence service in 1917 has changed the world history once and forever, and fundamentally.
Endeavour... [T]he Jewish Question. This is the theory that Jews, as a small minority, have a disproportionate amount of power in Western countries and use that power to benefit their own group interests to the detriment of the white [sic] majorities…
Thank you for tackling the all-important, so-called JQ “conspiracy” subject, Endeavour. Jewish supremacy is not a theory, however, but is a well-documented fact that you more or less confirm.
I didn’t need to read 4,000 words to find out what you have to say but simply did a word search on ‘jew’ to hit the high points about the JQ. Good job. The more we realistically discuss the JQ, the better.
no one in 1900 would have thought that within 20 years, the German, Austro-Hungarian, Russian, and Ottoman Empires all would’ve ceased to exist
In 1879, Wilhelm Marr predicted the Jewish-led Russian revolution, and that other European empires, especially Germany, would be dissolved and completely subjugated by Jewish forces.
In 1925, Hitler’s Mein Kampf asserted that Bolshevism was a tool used to enable the plunder of Russia by international capitalism after the inevitable collapse of the Soviet Union. This of course very accurately predicted what happened almost 70 years later when the Soviet Union’s infrastructure was sold for kopeykas on the ruble to what would become the oligarchs, many of them Jewish.
It appears that those who believe in Jewish conspiracies are often capable of predictions so amazing that you would deem them “impossible.”
Your discussion of Kalergi, apart from getting his ethnicity wrong, is misleading in that the “conspiracy theory” surrounding him did not start as an ex-post-facto thing among 21st century nationalists. His dream of a Pan-European Union flooded with Africans and Asians was presented by the SS as a Freemasonic vision of what to do with Europe if the Reich were to lose the war. This is expressed in the 1944 edition of the booklet Fremasonry – Ideology, Organization and Policy, which was compiled after the SS and Gestapo spent a decade raiding Masonic lodges across Europe and capturing numerous internal documents in the 1930’s and 1940’s.
Good comment. I like to say that while I am conspiracy theorist, my enemies are conspiracy practitioners.
In Endeavor’s final paragraph, below, I have to wonder why any serious White loyalist could possibly be interested in this nigger woman’s endless stream of podcasts or in anything she has to say about anything.
In her endless stream of podcasts on conspiracies, Candace Owens routinely contradicts herself from one week to the next. If one were to compare her most recent claims to those she had made a month or so earlier, glaring contradictions would be apparent. However, her audience does not question the continuity of any of her claims because the blatant falsehoods are buried under an endless tide of new content within days.
—
Will Williams: March 29, 2026 I couldn’t care less about what Candace Owens has to say about anything…
I thought that the article Becoming Based Black Girl – which exposes Candace’s past involvement with the NAACP, ridiculous stories, run-ins with the law, and history of fraud – was quite interesting:
https://national-conservative.com/the-rise-of-candace-owens/
She’s never been a serious person but conservatives at TPUSA wanted a “Based Black” spokeswoman so they looked past an immense amount of red flags.
Thanks, for the link Dani. I don’t know what “Based Black” means in that context, but her background for a nigger podcaster, popular with whites on anti-social media figures.
There are are millions of gullible, “conservative” white Christian Zionists following TPUSA, and a few Black ones now, thanks to the the former White-hating Negress, Owens.
Dani Vypont: April 5, 2026 I thought that the article Becoming Based Black Girl – which exposes Candace’s past involvement with the NAACP, ridiculous stories, run-ins with the law, and history of fraud – was quite interesting:
https://national-conservative.com/the-rise-of-candace-owens/
She’s never been a serious person but conservatives at TPUSA wanted a “Based Black” spokeswoman so they looked past an immense amount of red flags.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.