Counter-Currents
Alejandro Mayorkas helps us by showing just how ridiculous the Left’s positions really are. (Photo from the Department of Homeland Security website.)
2,125 words
Missouri Senator Josh Hawley grilled US Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas about the crisis on the Mexican border on February 2, stating in part that Mayorkas’ performance was “despicable” and that his unwillingness to provide answers was “absolutely atrocious.” Mayorkas attempted to deflect blame by stating that he is the child of a holocaust survivor, thereby implying that he, and by extension most Jews, should be above criticism.
It was hard to tell if he was being devious or if this is what he actually believes. Mayorkas’ blunder was so egregious I wouldn’t be surprised if Jonathan Greenblatt gave him a call afterwards about feeding “problematic anti-Semitic tropes.”
🇺🇸⁉️ Senator Josh Hawley: “You’re doing a terrible job as Secretary of Homeland Security.”
Alejandro Mayorkas: “I am the child of a Holocaust survivor.”
You can’t make this up… pic.twitter.com/tGAVb3ghye
— Censored Men (@CensoredMen) February 3, 2024
This blunder illustrates a broader phenomenon of the Left not understanding optics. I define “optics” as the good presentation of policy positions. It is essentially rhetoric, except that rhetoric applies only to verbal communication, while optics also includes non-verbal communication and particularly aesthetics.
First and foremost, the Left’s skills have atrophied because they have been playing on easy mode since the 1960s against their domestic and foreign opponents. The Left was able to mesmerize and indoctrinate the masses through TV, which they had a monopoly on, because only they could afford to acquire the mass media. But while technology grants power over external things, it tends to leave its users’ interior qualities unchanged — or worse off. The Left was able to pull off Waco, allow September 11 to happen, and paint Martin Luther King as a saint in large part due to their media monopoly. But now that this monopoly has been broken by alt media, they don’t know what to do as their actions finally catch up with them and their legitimacy crumbles.
Aside from inculcating an arrogant sense of entitlement which also contributes to their optics blunders, decades of dominance have likewise led to decay on the Left. The Left’s “long march through the institutions” was no easy task, but the old guard who accomplished that feat are retiring or dying off and failing to train their replacements (with some notable exceptions such as George Soros and his son, Alexander). Regardless of whether this was due to greed for power on the old guard’s part, a lack of promising candidates, or both, the end result is undeniable: The contemporary Left is arrogantly entitled and unskilled, and they are now confronted by their predecessors’ chickens coming home to roost.
They don’t know what to do. Maybe they don’t have any good options at all. As such, they usually elect to clumsily follow their predecessors’ playbook.
For example, Saul Alinsky in his Rules for Radicals knew how to be devious and think long-term, and many were able and willing to follow his guidance. But now, Alexander Soros and Gavin Newsom seem to be the only two adults of the Left capable of real leadership, and they have precious few competent troops. Furthermore, we have learned the Left’s playbook and developed appropriate counter measures, while they have failed to adapt to our counter measures. Overusing cheap parlor tricks invariably leads to people figuring them out. The times they are a changing, but not in the way Bob Dylan sang about.
Second, the Left has used democracy as its prime method of subversion. But for all of its backroom deals, bribery, blackmail, and influence peddling (the Arizona GOP Chair’s failed attempt to bribe Kari Lake comes to mind, as does Epstein’s Mossad blackmail operation), democracy inherently lacks centralized command and control. It is therefore easy for sub-factions and individual players to make dumb moves — that Klaus Schwab, George Soros, and Jonathan Greenblatt probably cringe at.
Soros might fund prosecutors, but can he tell them to hit the brakes when it comes to going too far too fast, thereby making propaganda for us? While the judges, journalists, and professors who have been marinated in and have wholly internalized the Leftist worldview might be loyal to a centralized vision, their execution of that vision is decentralized and thus liable to go off the rails, especially when they are true believers. Greenblatt can make his call to Mayorkas, but only after a blunder, and there is no guarantee that Mayorkas will even listen.
When we take power, we should not allow judges to remain unaccountable and thus prone to making stupid decisions that undermine our order’s legitimacy. In the meantime, we should viciously exploit this critical weakness of liberal democracy as much as the regime exploits us.
Third, the Left is inherently neurotic. Curtis Yarvin’s Cathedral theory of power holds that elite opinion is mostly molded by the media and academia. This is true, but there he overlooks one thing, which is that a substantial number of the elite, especially in media and academia, are Jewish.[1] Thus, because Leftist thought as expounded by the Cathedral is essentially Jewish thought, and Jews tend to be neurotic, those who internalize Leftist thought tend to pick up Jewish neuroticism. This reinforces the Left’s aforementioned sense of entitlement.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Toward a New Nationalism here.
This combination of entitlement and neuroticism means that any type of resistance to their will at home or abroad triggers an overreaction, because it is taken as a narcissistic slight. Machiavelli advised one to avoid being hated for being a bully and despised for being weak; the Left’s constant overreaction makes them both hated and despised. But every overreaction is a golden propaganda opportunity.
Neuroticism also leads to the Left putting pet theories such as global warming and racial equality ahead of hard facts. These hard facts then invariably slap them in the face, allowing us ample opportunities to humiliate and thus delegitimize them. This phenomenon has only intensified with the advent of “current things” such as Black Lives Matter and COVID.
Neuroticism also leads to a lack of introspection on how other people will interpret and react to their antics. In a rare example of introspection, however, on October 31, 2022 the Atlantic ran an article titled “Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty.” This was despite the fact that as late as January 2022, 59% of Democrats were in favor of confining the unvaccinated to their homes at all times except for emergencies, while 29% were in favor of temporarily taking children away from unvaccinated parents and 45% were in favor of temporarily placing the unvaccinated in “designated facilities,” a euphemism for concentration camps. No, thanks. I’d rather play hardball in the era of absolute politics. Freedom to act out one’s hall-monitor fantasies doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.
Fourth, the search for the latest “hot take,” which often devolves into absurdity, is not a problem limited to dissident podcasters. In fact, the Left and the dissident Right mirror each other almost perfectly in this regard. For example, the author of Harry Potter, J. K. Rowling, has been relegated to being whatever the Left’s equivalent is for a “cuck” because she is a TERF (Trans Exclusive Radical Feminist). Rowling would have been a vanguardist trailblazer in the 1990s, but now her feminism has been eclipsed by the transgender agenda, and her views seem downright retrograde compared to drag queen story hour.
Furthermore, there are essentially two Overton windows now: one for the radical Right and one for the radical Left. In each, a small but highly passionate minority can drag those who are closer to the center along with them. Our vanguard was able to force Charlie Kirk, of all people, to mention the fact that liberal Jews had shot themselves in the foot by funding anti-Semitism in colleges and universities, which opened up the floodgates for tasteful discussion of the Jewish Question.
But while our vanguard pushes the Right’s Overton window toward factual truth, the Left’s vanguard pushes theirs into absurd theories and moral repugnancy, as epitomized by drag queen story hour and ever-more creative excuses for why black people perpetually fail. Their optics are now worse than the edgiest wignat podcasters of 2016.
This phenomenon is further exacerbated by the way in which the current winner-take-all, two-party system encourages radical polarization, as has been explained by Christopher Zurn in Splitsville USA. Because every vote is needed to defeat the other party, radicals are able to force centrists submit to their demands. The Republicans cannot afford to alienate their pro-life sub-faction any more than the Democrats can afford to alienate their pro-abortion sub-faction. In a multi-party parliamentary system, radicals can form their own parties, and then centrists can decide whether to support them or not. In a two-party system, to not ally with them is suicidal, even if they detract from other policy positions and galvanize the opposition.
After Charlottesville, the Left went on a campaign of character assassination by wielding guilt by association. We should do the same — and for us, the Left’s associations are a lot less tenuous than the ones for which they attacked people on the Right. Any politician or influencer who fails to decisively disavow drag queen story hour and critical race theory should be as viciously smeared as the Left smeared us after Charlottesville. Few of them will be able to disavow their radicals, because they need them. In the meantime, we can continue pressuring our centrists into normalizing our policies and beliefs. If Turning Point USA morphs into a multiracial version of Identity Evropa, that will be a win.
The fifth and final issue is that the Left has too many hedonists and bioleninists. Hedonists naturally only think in the here and now. No depraved child molester thinks of the broader interests of the so-called “minor attracted person” community for even five seconds into the future, let alone five years. Hence, they are constantly trying to normalize pedophilia and are caught committing horrific crimes, despite the fact that this undermines their own position as well as the broader Left’s. Individuals with gender dysphoria make excellent shock troops for the establishment, akin to the Ottoman Empire’s janissaries, as explained here. Pedophiles do, too, and for many of the same reasons; thus, the two categories frequently overlap. But they are also naturally repulsive to decent people, especially since they have almost no control over their depraved impulses. The FBI and antifa are therefore doomed to pedophile scandal after pedophile scandal. Exploiting this is easy, highly effective, and righteous.
The Left’s pedophile and transgender problem is part of the broader issue of bioleninism. Marxism’s ultimate goal was never to uplift the working classes, but rather to destroy European society via internal revolution as part of a Jewish vendetta. The Marxists initially targeted factory workers because they thought they had “revolutionary potential” due to the atrocious working conditions they underwent during the Industrial Revolution. Their underlying idea is that the more broken and miserable a person is, the more revolutionary potential he has to tear down his own country.
You can buy Tito Perdue’s novel Opportunities in Alabama Agriculture here.
It soon became apparent, however, that white workers did not have much revolutionary potential, because capitalism was able to provide them material comforts following the Industrial Revolution’s excesses, and also because they did not inherently hate their own countries. This is why Marxism came to adopt an anti-white, anti-colonial stance and began using blacks and the Third World as a wrecking ball against white nations.
This ultimately wasn’t enough, either, though. Too many non-white immigrants either adopted the West’s decadent culture and saw their own birth rates plummet. Others assimilated into their new countries and were thus loath to wreck it. Many of them are simple people who came here for economic reasons, and are thus indifferent to politics. The fact is that most people simply aren’t nasty enough to fulfill Marxism’s true goals. 1990s-style immigration could very well have replaced white people through a slow process of demographic decline, but it was not working fast enough for the Left, which has become ever more impatient.
Thus, the Left embraced the lowest, most disgusting dregs of society as their final option: pedophiles, transgender individuals, the homeless, drug addicts, ultra-violent criminals. The worse they are, the more fawning the Left is. Aside from a few sophomoric idiots who drank the Kool-Aid in their undergraduate days, this is not driven by any real sympathy, but rather by hatred for the European race and its civilization. Associating with, let alone embracing, such creatures as favored pets is terrible optics. We must ensure that the bioleninist strategy’s negatives come to far outweigh its positives as a matter of our survival. Thankfully, this is an easy task.
Note
[1] An Anonymous January 6th Prisoner, The American Regime (Quakertown, Pa.: Antelope Hill Publishing, 2022), pp. 202-203.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
34 comments
Fuck optics.
Because of optics you are writing a well written article in a website nobody reads, while Mayorkas is the Director of DHS.
We don’t need optics. We need real political power. And that power is not given, but taken. And in order to take it, you need real political actions, not well written articles complaining about big bad jews who are mean to some race traitor.
NND wrote:
>> Fuck optics.
Because of optics you are writing a well written article in a website nobody reads, while Mayorkas is the Director of DHS.
We don’t need optics. We need real political power. And that power is not given, but taken. And in order to take it, you need real political actions, not well written articles complaining about big bad jews who are mean to some race traitor. <<
Bullshit. Power is “taken” by rhetoric. This is Grug Brain 101.
Julius Caesar gained power by throwing lavish parties for his rich friends in Rome and by publishing potboilers about his foreign military exploits.
If you try to seize power with guns or pitchforks and barricades, you will get clobbered by regular army troops and police because political establishments do not easily hand over power. This is true even in Third World countries with dodgy institutions and subpar cadre.
There is a reason why historically all regimes have dealt with mutiny and treason most harshly. You will probably have to impose revolutionary power from without ─ and that is not so easy to do even if you already have powerful legions at your command.
One of the reasons why democratic regimes are so stable is because Gridlock ─ i.e., never getting anything done ─ is baked right into the political cake. So there are not really any stakes risked between electing Tweedledee or Tweedledum.
But democratic dogmas can be used against their own cognitive dissonance. And I can think of a good example.
Hitler found that despite plenty of popular support and even support from elites like Gen. Ludendorff and the Bavarian President von Kahr, and a dangerous threat of Marxist insurrection, the Nazi coup was easily crushed despite its popular support.
What this means is that Hitler then resorted to Rhetoric and Optics ─ explaining the situation and its solutions to all classes of Germans from every angle possible, and using the media of the day: rallies, newspapers, speeches, radio, planes, trains, and automobiles.
A former Bavarian Army corporal in the war, Hitler was running against Field Marshal von Hindenburg for Head of the [Freaking] German State ─ and he did respectably in the Presidential elections, twice.
By the time the Zentrum coalition cucks had given up the ghost in the Reichstag when the last Allied iteration of German war-debt restructing failed due to the Stock Market Crash, the NSDAP had the plurality in the legislative body and Hermann Göring was elected the Reichstag President.
This normally would have led to Hitler becoming Chancellor as the head of the major Party, but Hindenburg tried literally everybody else first, all of whom at least partially ruled via emergency powers. Eventually, President Hindenburg appointed Hitler Chancellor (with the old Marshal’s favorite, former Chancellor von Papen, now becoming the Vice Chancellor).
With the NSDAP controlling the Reichstag and with Hindenburg’s support, it wasn’t difficult then to ban the Communist Party as a foreign menace and to get things done. The bourgeoisie and the industrialists fell in line as they always do. Some elements of the Junkers military caste took longer to get onboard with Hitler, but they had always served Germany loyally in the past, and for the most part continued to do so.
Jews were removed from political power and in academia, law, and the media, and stripped of German citizenship. I used to think that this measure was rather harsh but I no longer do.
The Western and American plight is far more complicated than it was in Germany a century ago, and there are no easy answers.
But if you have any better ideas, Hasbara, do tell.
🙂
Scott,
You seem to have a very firm understanding of German post World War I, Weimar Republic history and Hitler’s path to power.
You also seem to be very practical and a good writer.
Are you familiar with my/our (Occidental Dissent, Farstar) political comics.
I share your views about Harold Covington’s excellent writing, Resistance Zion and his Northwest Independence novels. Yes, I understand his personal failings, he did slander, spread malicious gossip about others including about yours truly.
This is my first week as a inside the paywall CC member. The US Mail is taking a very long time to deliver my contribution.
Keep up the good solid work, let’s talk in a safe, privacy protected manner.
Jaye Ryan
TPC Radio Show hosted by James Edwards (I was the cultural correspondent)
OD Occidental Dissent – I’ve been a contributing writer there and LOS activist for many years.
I’m actually not, but it sounds interesting. Anyone can contact me via e-mail. It is not a secret address. But do put something in the subject line that captures my attention. I get a lot of Spam. The address is: [email protected]
🙂
It’s a website sort of like cc, run by hunter Wallace, mostly just his occasional musings. Basically the same pov, but it’s a little more newsy. The commenters there are really funny.
To have power, you have to have oodles of money.
So, start working two jobs, save like crazy and studying finance.
The road to power will follow.
Be kind to everyone you meet and observe quietly how they got there.
Keep our goals for Whites always in mind quietly.
I’m so glad to be sharing these pages with you and your enthusiasm.
You forgot to mention the Jewish involvement with banking and small merchandising in the towns and small villages, especially the banking practice 0f usurious rates of loan interest. Farmers were ruined when they borrowed to buy seeds, or replace an old cow that no longer gave milk. Many farmers and small businesses were destroyed and Jews bought up the properties, further enriching themselves and their families. However, Germans and other wise Europeans have long memories, and when the ‘holocaust’ came along, they turned their backs as just rewards — as I see the whole JQ problem from the beginning,
I hope someone far more scholarly than myself can research this angle because it is the only way to shut down the ‘holocaust industry’ and its weeping and wailing and blaming that still obsess the Europeans and Americans.
First, the use or praise of one tactic is not to the exclusion or disparagement of others. This is a common fallacy in online discourse for whatever reason.
Second, I would be shocked if there has ever been even a single political force in history which has gone from zero to a hundred overnight. I suppose the extensive pre-revolution writings of the American Founders was just a frivolous waste of time.
And for the record, I have also served the movement as a front-line activist.
Great article, but I think the clip of the Hawley-Mayorkas exchange looks different when viewed in context. Hawley was complaining that Mayorkas wouldn’t confirm whether an employee of the Dept of Homeland Security had been fired for posting anti-Israel and pro-Hamas messages on social media. It was Hawley who was suggesting that the employee was “anti-semitic” and “pro-genocide” and, therefore, according to Hawley, needing to be fired on the assumption that the employee couldn’t be expected to perform his/her work duties fairly. And Hawley suggested that Mayorkas was at fault for allegedly not doing all he could to terminate the employee. So that’s what prompted Mayorkas to puff up and respond with essentially, “how dare you, as a child of holocaust survivors, I take great umbrage, blah blah.”
I do think that jews often pull the “we’re above criticism” or “criticism of us should be banned and seen as evil hate” games, but this particular exchange isn’t as great an example of it as it looks to be upon first glance. It was a bad response and more or less exemplified the practice that you describe, but his evoking the idea of jewish victimhood didn’t come out of the blue here and was first raised by Hawley, who suggested that Mayorkas was insufficiently concerned about jewish victims.
I would ask Hawley, “when was the last time you got so worked up about anti-white speech? Why don’t we see the same fire from you when people, including those in positions of power, celebrate the ethnic cleansing and replacement of white people?”
Thank you for this comment. As much as I like Zsutty, he didn’t do his homework on this one.
Thank you for pointing out the context here. It is good to stand corrected if it is needed. I will say that the point stands if taking into account Mayorkas’ appointment as DHS Komissar. Both Mayorkas’ and HIAS celebrated his appointment explicitly saying it was a triumph and a blessing and that he is accepting the position as a member of his tribe. The optics are further worsened because he sat on the board of HIAS as he lay in waiting for this opportunity. They are still worse because of the clips of him smirking demonically at Biden’s side when he said there would be an unrelenting stream of immigration to make Europeans a minority. His smirk widened when Biden emphasized that making Europeans a minority was a good thing and said, “It is a source of our strength.” Now who the our is in the our strength bit has a strong tie to it. That tie and that optic is still further worsened by the fact that under the leadership of Mayorkas, DHS has shoveled at least $100 million into the coffers of HIAS to fund the invasion and the dispossession of European man.
Point taken that this is a problem. I would also say that Hawley has an optics problem. I suspect that in the next few years, Hawley, Blake Masters, DiSantis, Kristi Noem and others who signed away the first amendment for a specific group but never said a word on behalf of our folk in the face of brazen dispossession and genocidal polemics from centers of power, will also have an optics problem on their hands. Just as the system delegitimizes itself day by day, the aforementioned, “white conservatives”, have laid their cards on the table and are going to replaced – either by enemies who they refuse to fight back against or by us with people who will do what they lacked the wisdom and courage to do.
Szutty is right. In sum Mayorkas has an optics problem. It is up to the DR to sieze upon the sum total of the things I mentioned and blast it on Twitter with memes and short video clips to put it in front of everyone’s eyes.
I absolutely agree! And I didn’t realize that Mayorkas was the grinning bald man next to Biden in that infamous “source of our strength” clip. That man is scum.
And, just so it’s clear, I wasn’t trying to knock the article’s author. He’s outstanding and has written another excellent piece here. I just hate to see the other side be able to claim “out of context” as a way to dismiss a valid argument and conclusion. So I think it’s better to always lean on the side of showing full context to deprive the other side of being able to claim they’ve “debunked” something without having to address the argument. Selective and misleading editing usually ends up backfiring in the long run. And I’m not suggesting the author was misleading in any way. I just think there’s so much dirt and material to convict the other side with that we don’t ever have to leave out any context or feel like we have to make their words sound worse than they are.
Through the buddy system, exercising good faith we help each other get stronger and avoid our own optics and legitimacy problems. Doing so, we will realize the promise of our righteous cause. Good work broadening the context. It not only reveals a weakness in our optics, but it expands the bad optics from Mayorkas to Hawley.
Mayorkas looks like a rat. It’s a regular Jew, disloyal to its host population.
I think we should stop using the terms “Left” and “Right” to describe the likes of Department of Homeland Security Mayorkus – he’s an international J. His homeland if and when he ever wants to go there for more than an R&R rest up is of course the J ethnostate called Israel.
Any Conservative White American, GOP who wants to waste even a minute “grilling” Department of Homeland Security Mayorkus or the US Attorney General Garland another Hebe Chosenite – those Conservatives GOP might as well waste their time calling the J corporate heads of CNN, MSNBC, WaPost, New York times complaining their news coverage of Saint George Floyd, BLM “protests” wasn’t fair and accurate or trying to get the TRUTH out that Iraq really didn’t have weapons of mass destruction and David Frum’s worst ever speech for then President George W Bush (twin of Beverley Hillbillies “Jethro”) – that the USA was fighting for Freedom and Democracy against an “Axis of Evil”.
C’mon folks. We know better.
Those terms “Left” and “Right” are left over from the time immediately after the French Revolution where French stood in the French Assembly from Left to Center to Right on how they felt about atheist, no private property to the Left, to Constitutional Republic in the Center, to hereditary Catholic monarchy to the extreme Right.
Everything is racial now and in this case with Director of Homeland Security Mayorkus …. It’s the Js Stupid.
A good article, but one flippant comment is not as simple as it sounds – holding judges accountable. The whole point of a judge is that he must be in some way objective and impartial. Firing judges every time they make a (according to you) bad judgement, and solely because they make a aubjextivrlh bad court judgement, defeats the whole purpose of a judiciary. In the American system judges who are bad are typically not promoted upwards, which is a controlling mechanism.
While I certainly agree with your point generally, it kind of ignores the uniquely difficult situation we find ourselves in. Yes, in a healthy and sane society, it is important that the judiciary remain independent and free from strong-arm influence, especially when they make decisions that are politically unpopular yet legally correct. Dragging a judge in front of some all-powerful committee everytime they make a decision not liked by the Politburo would be not only impractical but also contrary to the rule of law. Not to mention who in their right mind would even want the robed position knowing that was a possibility? However, what do we do when the judicial branch themselves becomes the tyranny they are supposed to protect us from?
Think about it like this: if the President doesn’t like something Congress does, he has the veto power; if Congress doesn’t like the President’s veto, they can override it. If the SCOTUS doesn’t think one of the other branches acted constitutionally, they can overturn the action with a majority ruling. But what happens when the SCOTUS ignores the Constitution and starts making up rules based on its own subjective philosophy (which is exactly what it has been doing since at least 1954, arguably even longer). What is the check on power then? Federal judges are appointed for life under Article III of the Constitution, so there’s really no getting rid of them outside of manufacturing some personal “scandal,” and that just never works, not even for a “conservative” justice like Clarence Thomas. The only answer you’re really left with is a constitutional amendment, which is a gargantuan process to undertake in comparison with the checks available when other branches overreach their power. I honestly don’t know if the framers envisioned the situation we are in today, or they would have included language and tools to prepare for/deal with it.
Richard Chance wrote:
I agree with the point made about the Constituional independence of the Judiciary, but it is high time for a major purge.
Just how, I don’t know. I’m not sure that FDR was 100 percent wrong with his court-packing scheme. (The “Nine Old Men” had decided that “the Business of Goverment was Business,” as Pres. Coolidge might have put it, and that the “Free Market” was God Almighty.)
If Trump is reelected in 2024, he might not do very much for us, but at least his judicial appointments will be loads better than what Biden or Hillary’s would have been.
🙂
I’m repeating myself but we should stop using enemy terms like ‘transgender’ except in quotes. They’re made up and give undeserved dignity to a delusion, tricking too many into believing a ‘gender-reasssignment’ surgery can perform magic. Sexual-identity disturbed, for the psychological state and cross-dresser (whether by surgery and hormones or not) for the behaviour are more accurate without being derogatory. It’s another front in the meme war. Make sex (never ‘gender’) binary again. Banish gender to grammar books where it belongs.
The left may not understand optics, but the left understands how to seize and exercise power.
“Any politician or influencer who fails to decisively disavow drag queen story hour and critical race theory should be as viciously smeared as the Left smeared us after Charlottesville.”
Absolutely! And I would add that they should also be expected to acknowledge the fact that critical race theory is anti-white as a reason why they’re disavowing it. It shouldn’t be enough for them to say, “because it is based on identity politics,” or, “because it’s divisive.” Explicit denunciations of anti-white programs should become normal and mainstream, and those refusing to call out anti-white programs by name should be made pariahs. They should feel pressured. Today too many of them will answer, “I oppose all forms of racism” and will refuse to say “white,” when asked if they’ll condemn anti-white programs. And when asked about affirmative action, they’ll fall back on, “it’s unfair to Asians,” without explicitly denouncing the programs as anti-white. This needs to change, and I believe it’s already happening.
“Thus, because Leftist thought as expounded by the Cathedral is essentially Jewish thought, and Jews tend to be neurotic, those who internalize Leftist thought tend to pick up Jewish neuroticism. This reinforces the Left’s aforementioned sense of entitlement.”
This reminds me of something Guillaume Faye said at an AmRen conference many years ago; ie, that Jews are excellent tacticians but poor strategists, as they always push things too far. They can’t help themselves.
People in this sphere are always going on about how Marxism is in power, how they’re allowing the Chinese to take over the world, and how the Left dominates everything, while Bernie Sanders is systematically cucked out of the primaries by his own Democrats and whenever a real Marxist party comes close to power anywhere in Europe the system recoils and conspires against it, the same way it does with the Right. Marx is patronized by the system, but kept in his kennel – he is by no means the head of the household.
Power is held not by the Marxist Left, rather power is expressed through the Marxist Left, often against its own interests. No Marxist in the 70s or even 80s gave a damn about homosexuals or the newly invented transgenders, both of which weaken and divide the proletariat and make them less capable of revolution.
Real power is held by the radical center of Neoliberals who peddle the one-dimensional Left-Right framework and are able to play both sides when needed. They plagiarize Marx for their own devices but within the modus of the free market open society, because their rhetoric suits them, but will keep the Hard Left well out of power and are just as comfortable hitching their wagon to the Conservatives if needed. Anyone outside of their power is not even electable. This is the only version of the system as it is that makes sense to me. Jews are players, power brokers, big movers and shakers and have more power than they ever had, but it isn’t solely Jews either. It’s a many-headed thing, a hydra, and thats part of what makes this system so complicated and hard to understand, and thereby hard to resist effectively, but luckily for us, also why it sucks to much at governing.
There is something to this mindset that people in power use. It’s a type of arrogance and they don’t care that they look stupid. There are a lot of examples if you pay attention. Back in 2016, the commanding general of the air force academy, a three star idiot, General Silvera attempted to take advantage of the hate crime hoax that a black cadet committed. He gave a press conference telling the racist cadets to leave the academy, although there wasn’t any evidence that there were any racist cadets in attendance. He was talking to non-existent Nazis. He said that he didn’t care that it was a hoax. He also made a sympathetic reference to the black rioters in Ferguson, MI. Of course the ADL gave him an award and fawned over him. He received criticism from various commentators, but it didn’t amount to anything. He should have received a lot more criticism, especially from his superiors. He said in so many words that he didn’t care about the truth of the situation. Also, anyone of average intelligence could see that the riots in Ferguson were not based on any type of police conduct, that the black rioters were completely at fault. He had this attitude that since I’m taking a stand against racism, you can’t criticize me. That’s one the moments when I begin to notice the lack of competence in the military’s leadership. When Kyle Rittenhouse killed a Marxist pedophile in self defense, a lot of commentators couldn’t understand why he got off. They had this detachment from reality, as if the fact that it was self defense was irrelevant. Another example is Biden’s press secretary. In the recent past, when she got agitated and couldn’t answer a reporters question, she reminded the journalists present that she was a black female, as if everyone was supposed to stop asking her difficult questions. These people should have been mocked the way the left mocks people on the right. Tucker Carlson was good at exposing this mindset. That’s one of the reasons that he was taken off of Fox News.
David Zsutty is the only personality in the CC ecosystem who isn’t blocking me on social media. He has a future.
Which social media? I think my profile is shadow banned on Twitter. Because I haven’t gotten a like or reply in a long time.
For what it’s worth, I’ve never blocked you anywhere.
What the hell are you even talking about?
Why would a life long fed like this twirp immediately pull out the holocaust card in congress? Truly shameless. I can’t believe his family would even support this kind of shallow pandering.
From the above article: “Marxism’s ultimate goal was never to uplift the working classes, but rather to destroy European society via internal revolution as part of a Jewish vendetta.” – That is true. Communism is a Jewish ideology. Jewish finance moguls (such as Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg) financed the Bolsheviks not out of any sympathy for the Russian masses, but out of hatred for the entire White race, including the working classes.
Jews enthusiastically supported Russia, when the Bolsheviks ruled it. They denied its genocide against the Russian people, while simultaneously endorsing it – just as they do today with the Great Replacement.
Jews are genocide deniers, except for the one case where Jews themselves were the victims. Often, Jews are the perpetrators of genocide, which they celebrate in the Old Testament and the Talmud.
Today, once again, Israel commits genocide in Gaza, while the Jews cry out in pain
Whenever I hear someone throw out, “as the child of a holocaust survivor,” I think of the Phil Hendrie radio show character that always used to say, “as a gay man and a gay journalist.” Anyone else remember that show? It was a joke that revealed how such a declaration could easily put people on notice to watch their words and muzzle themselves and behave in a deferential way. And, sure enough, some callers to the show did respond deferentially once they heard they were dealing with a gay man and a gay journalist, even if the topic being discussed had nothing to do with homosexuality and even if the gay character was talking complete nonsense. It was quite funny.
“Freedom to act out one’s hall-monitor fantasies doesn’t mean freedom from consequences.”
If I ever meet you in person, I would like to shake your hand for writing this. You have given me fresh hope.
Whites are facing all sorts of attacks from all corners, and the only way to save our collective skins is to have oodles of money. If you are in college, drop out after the next quarter and get a job, and then another job. If need be, sleep in a camper and save every penny. Getting into the top 10% of richest people in the world needs a total of 250K — one quarter of a million. Go for it. Set your goals now while you can. You will need it for safety, security and SURVIVAL.
If you ch0ose to remain in college, make finance your second major. Learn how the world is constructed in economics. Learn how Jews have plunged 60% of Americans into credit card debt of tens of thousands of dollars. And above all, do not get yourself into debt!
Just a warning from a person who went through a lot of losses, but has finally got savvy, and is passing it on because someone intelligent like you is needed in this crisis, quietly and safely tucked away with money for survival.
Another way is to convince people to not spend money in anything that is hostile or a threat to our race. This would be difficult, but not impossible. You would have to convince a lot of people, and I’m talking about whites, to stop spending money on sports, movies and tv, and other things that we spend money on. Whites are abandoning the military for this reason, so it’s not out of the question.
Thanks for your comment, and I agree totally with you about not spending on sports, movies and TV, and I would add nonsense on the computer such as Tic Tik (which I’ve never seen), and I would also add, playing the lottery, etc.
I am thinking in terms of Whites having a War Chest of money to get each of us and our families through whatever our serious enemies throw at us, and I’ve set $250K as our goal to be working toward. And I’m open to new ideas.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment