Image source: Flickr
1,841 words
Part 1 of 2 (Part 2 here)
I haven’t commented on this website for a long while, and have only managed to read some occasional essays and comments over the past two years or so due to major life changes and heavier loads of work. Now, in my summer vacation as a college instructor, I can finally squeeze in some time to write something about China.
Besides being an ardent East-Asian supporter of White Nationalism and a big fan of the invaluable Counter-Currents, I have lived in China for more than a decade and consider myself an old China hand — i.e., an expert on Chinese affairs. I speak Chinese, English, and Japanese fluently and use my proficiency in Chinese to voraciously read all their sources of information, both official and in its more popular forms, and both online and offline, to observe them firsthand. I also actively interact with Chinese from all walks of life and from across the social spectrum, down to the vagrants in the street and up to the level of local politicians. I have lived there for years, unlike tourists who stay there for a couple of weeks at most.
Admiration of China has been going on in White Nationalist circles for a while, at the sites of Andrew Anglin and Ron Unz, among others. Mr. Fred Reed has recently written two essays on China which were published at Counter-Currents on June 3 and July 17. Like some of the others, Mr. Reed’s articles do have some factual basis, as he rhapsodizes over the formidable and admirable advantages that the country possesses. On the other hand, such essays also contain no small amount of emotionally-driven exaggerations, oversimplifications, and half-truths that are the result of limited vision, a lack of in-depth knowledge about China, or the (completely justified) hatred of the anti-white rulers of today’s West. These cause some people to embrace the broad-brushed theory of “enemy’s enemy is my friend.”
There’s also a tendency to lump China and the Ukraine-Russia conflict together in an implicit attempt to lend legitimacy and tenability to a conciliatory and appeasing stance on China by confusing the China Question with the mistrust many White Nationalists feel toward mainstream Western politics and the Biden government. However, in his misperception and misjudgment, Mr. Reed has indeed failed to grasp the evil and sinister nature as well as the enormity of the China Peril and sacrificed the cause of justice for the white man. This is disappointing, misleading, and dangerous.
You can buy Greg Hood’s Waking Up From the American Dream here.
Mr. Reed elaborated and extolled China’s prosperity, technological advancements, major strengths, and vast human pool of future technicians and engineers, among other things. These things are largely true and objective for their own sake (with some exaggerations). But they are an incomplete story, as those facts are one-sided and superficial, which render their referential value limited.
It is one-sided is because the author mostly likely did not venture into any of the small towns or countryside in China, and only traveled to the so-called “first-line” fancy big cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and a few others). He thus failed to grasp the complete picture of that country. Secondly, the author only witnessed — or chose to look at — the bright side of China, as lavishly harped upon in his articles, but again failed to perceive the vast, sprawling, systemic, deep-seated, irresoluble, and simmering problems and crises in China. For example, it has one of the world’s worst levels of corruption, it has an ongoing severe economic recession, there is an immense social and wealth gap accompanied by surging resentment from the grassroots, an intense and fierce power struggle within the upper power echelons, as well as subtle but definitely unmistakable and growing trends among the youth to become increasingly inward-looking and listless. As a result, they are self-absorbed and sometimes even rebellious toward the government. All of this combines to present seriously volatile and destabilizing factors that have the potential to lead to China’s implosion and collapse.
To say Mr. Reed’s writings on China are superficial is because while the author witnessed China’s impressive infrastructural and technological achievements, as well as the humungous human pool in technology and engineering that form China’s power base, he failed to understand that all that science, technological knowhow, and expertise originated from the West — mainly America and Western Europe, as well as Japan to a lesser degree. China has stolen this knowledge by means of spying, hacking, and bribing in the most ruthless and relentlessly disingenuous ways the world has ever experienced. China has virtually no scientific innovation of its own, as all the sources of its much-trumpeted progress have been other people’s intellectual wealth, from the late nineteenth century to the present. The Chinese learned, copied, moderated, and in some cases improved on it, admittedly, and then claimed all the credit for themselves by concealing or distorting the truth in order to boost public morale and promote its own image internationally. This is besides the fact that many of China’s infrastructure and industrial projects, despite their shining veneers, contain structural defects and usually do not last long.
Because of this critical and fundamental deficiency in scientific and technological innovation, the West should muster the collective wisdom and willpower to deprive China of any additional significant information in this regard by cutting it off from the cream of the Western intelligentsia, ending its spying and theft, and putting a stop to the stream of Chinese students who go to the West to study (i.e., steal) as well as all forms of bilateral exchanges, whether human or material. (Elon Musk, I’m speaking to you! You’re a good guy, but don’t be stupid or naïve! China will rob you of all your high technology if you refuse to listen and fall into the trap of believing the unctuous talk and empty promises of the Chinese and persist with your headstrong investments there.) This essentially means that if the West stops being the ignorant blood donor for China, the country will most definitely cease to be a dazzling wonderland in the eyes of some Westerners and stop being a dire threat. It is my prediction that the liberal-democrat bigwigs in the Biden regime and their ilk will take only small and highly limited steps in this direction, despite their impositions of sanctions on this and that, followed mostly by talks of little substance. Even those sanctions which were implemented were incredibly weak and full of loopholes that China can easily exploit. Hopefully a second Trump presidency can do more, but will likely still fall short of being enough to put the final nail in China’s coffin. Only a truly White Nationalist-led America would have the sagacity and resolve to complete the job through a total, categorical, unmitigated, and uncompromising disengagement with China.
Now comes the most critical and crucial part: The whole nation of China — including the majority of the Han Chinese and a sizable number of the Han-assimilated ethnic minorities — hates and envies the West and its white people down to their marrow. They are hell-bent on destroying, subjugating, replacing, conquering, or enslaving the white race. Once they reckon that they are capable of doing it, they will not hesitate for a second to put a knife to the collective throat of whites and launch wars of genocidal destruction upon the Western nations. This is not hyperbole, but a plain truth, and any person who can read Chinese only needs to take a quick look at the large numbers of vlogs and comments on Chinese Douyin (TikTok) and other Chinese domestic social media sites to see that they are all infested with hyper-nationalistic, jingoistic, and chauvinistic content spewing the most toxic kinds of anti-Western and anti-white messages. Meanwhile, the all-powerful and all-controlling Chinese government turns a blind eye to their blustering and hate-mongering, if not actually actively encouraging them.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Against Imperialism here.
If you think that China and the Chinese are the enemies of the West’s anti-white elites, or that only the Chinese regime is against the West, you are completely wrong. It is the entire Chinese people who are determined to target whites with an implacable animosity. This is not simply due to the fact that they are brainwashed by their regime, which they undoubtedly are, but more because of their ultra- ethnocentric and hubristic “Central Kingdom” (the literal meaning of “China” in Chinese) complex, which has been written in their blood for a thousand years. This is characterized by a combined sense of arrogance and inferiority, as manifested by their alternating envy and hatred for the white race. Their wicked intentions regarding the white race knows no bounds and can only be countered by permanently rendering China weak through defeat, division, and reeducation, and by means of containing and starving it of all West’s “nutrients,” as discussed above.
Thus, as it should already be clear to all who can see, the idea of China-worship is silly and pointless, as it is both distracting and self-defeating. An avowed and hardened enemy who is determined to exterminate or enslave you, for all its ethnonationalism, collectivist efficiency, grit, resilience, and ruthlessness, is not worth worshipping, but is certainly worth studying and emulating. We should not worship China, for the common-sense reason that you don’t worship someone who wants to destroy you, just as we do not worship Israel and Jews for their political and financial supremacy. Nor do we worship the current American regime for its power and wealth. Let me repeat: China should be studied and emulated in certain aspects, but it should not be worshipped blindly and must be contained — resolutely and effectively.
To contain and defang China, it is ideal to avoid a direct military conflict with it. Rather we should put in place a constant mental and physical preparedness opposing it. Besides cutting off its access to Western knowledge, it is key for the West to leverage and utilize allied powers as well. This is the role that countries such as Japan and Taiwan can play, as they can be effective buffers geopolitically. My consistent opinion on this is that unless critically necessary, the US should stop short of direct military intervention while actively and unequivocally aiding Japan and Taiwan. This can be done by rearming Japan and selling advanced weaponry to Taiwan, as both of them share the same basic humanistic values as whites and are peace-loving and non-threatening to the white race, as long as they are left alone and not permitted to immigrate to the West en masse.
The Japanese and Taiwanese are a quite different and better sort than the Chinese and Koreans in my long study of East Asian racial subgroups. Koreans are jealous, petty-minded, narcissistic, rude, and rowdy, but it is the Chinese who harbor inextinguishably insidious and spiteful intentions toward whites and will aggressively seek to harm and displace them. Through combining the strategies of isolating China and assisting Japan and Taiwan to counter it, the dragon can be subdued without shedding white blood.
While some may say I don’t know America, I would say they don’t know China.
24 comments
“These cause some people to embrace the broad-brushed theory of “enemy’s enemy is my friend.”
Wow, this reminds me of a different contemptible contingent within WN, which (surprise!) includes Anglin and Unz also.
“[T]he West should muster the collective wisdom and willpower to deprive China of any additional significant information in this regard by cutting it off from the cream of the Western intelligentsia…”
(((Prof. Jeffrey Sachs))) for instance, who runs interference for muh China every chance he gets, and often gets signal boosted by credulous Neo-Nazis.
Very interesting, cheers. Perhaps in your second half you can include some personal anecdotes from your years in China. So far your article puts forth many bold claims I expect are accurate, and demonstrating some of these thru firsthand experience could be powerful. I confess that I enjoy this battle of the ex pats. Your turn, Fred Reed.
But can the author indicate whether their ancestry is partly from China or Japan? This is important.
During election night 2016 I was aboard a ship to Antarctica, and a quarter of the guests were Chinese. The following morning I spoke with the Chinese guide about the results. “Oh, we love Donald Trump” he smiled. “He is so stupid.” I won’t even go into the experience standing behind them in the buffet line.
As for the extent to which the West has fallen, a copy is not supposed to improve upon the original. Let’s not help China buck this trend.
It’s a hard pill to swallow, so there is some willful ignorance in play. Russia and China are not our friends. They actually like our hostile occupation regime because they correctly access that it erodes our power. They are still the enemy.
Jewified China certainly is a threat to the collective West, but the inherent pride and strength of the Chinese and their ancient culture should not be viewed as such. Much can be learned from these people and this part of the world.
Their hate for white people? It’s only a reflection of our bourgeois/Zionist-infused spirit of defeat. What healthy people or culture would view “woke whiteness” any other way? At least they have been able to name it—“白左” “baizuo” or “white left”—so as to potentially root it out if it seeps too far into their own modern culture.
America is in a state of collapse and if someone is going to come into our globalized house to clean up the mess (through “pest control”, perhaps), it would probably be the folks from the “Middle Kingdom”. Any other culture or civilization left on this shithole (called planet earth) simply wouldn’t be able to.
You’re very very wrong. The hatred the Chinese hold for whites has nothing to do with Jews, very little to do with commies, and China is not “Jewified”. It’s simply the deep envy Joe Sobran talked about combined with an ugly, petty, meek, and narrow-minded soul. I’ve met too many Chinese on the Internet exhibiting all of those traits to consider it anything but the norm. A look at Chinese history and philosophy (incredibly unimpressive if you decide to actually engage with it) would highlight the same characteristics, and I’m often puzzled what exactly is the “ancient and sophisticated” civilization a WN would refer to in regards to an ossified nation of bureaucrats like the Chinese. Read your Duchesne!
I’ve met plenty face to face and besides a common politeness reserved for “foreigners” when you scratch the surface you start to see the same traits as those you’ll meet online.
Was at a dinner party a month ago and the older Chinese male in the group began attacking America with the same talking points you’ll see on many of the so-called alternative right websites. He then asked me how to safely invest his money into American real estate. I asked if he was so patriotic why didn’t he buy another local property? The silence was deafening.
The situation is indeed dire for the White West. But the fault does not lie in demonizing the Chinese, especially the talk about their “shallow” “evil” souls. They themselves have basically been minding their own business for most of their history. But now they have been set up in opposition to “take over” from the White Western world when or if it fully collapses.
The author tries to distinguish between China, Taiwan, Japan and Korea but really they are very similar ethnicities (with similar “souls”?). The difference between them is that the latter three countries have been pacified (Americanized and feminized) since the Second World War. They are all too Western in their degenerate social norms and “pleasant” demeanor towards foreigners and, indeed, themselves.
The Red Chinese, like the American blacks after the Civil War, didn’t really win anything after the Second World War (Chang Kai Shek did most of the fighting for the rival Red Chinese rival Kuomintang against the Japanese and he himself was bailed out by the Americans when they nuked Japan and forced its overall defeat).
The Red Chinese were given their status out of some sense of white perversion and lunacy just like the current elevated status of the blacks (which Jim Goad pointed out a few weeks ago when discussing Juneteenth in Counter Currents). It doesn’t mean the Chinese or the blacks are “bad”, “dripping with vindictive hatred for the white man”. That’s nonsense. It’s just how they have been trained to behave in this world. They, like the blacks on a smaller scale, are a reflection of a dichotomy that has been set up.
To actually speak of them, the Chinese are some of the most stable, industrious and contented people on the planet; of course they have their own petty faults and foibles ( I suppose you could count their “Jewish” interest in money as one of them) but every racial group has them in one way or another.
It’s dangerous to label the “Chinese soul” as having particular characteristics. What do those who say so really know about the soul? Are they mystics? Sounds like hogwash to me.
If we are to talk about their “soul” or racial identity it’s important to note that they have not been left alone; they themselves did not want to get to know the other racial groups. After all, it is Zheng He, the eunuch, who decided to turn around the Ming Emperor’s armada in Equitorial Africa and head home (instead of head off to Europe to cause who knows what type of damage), hence which, upon return to China, they burned their ships and vowed never to set out for foreign lands again. If anything describes “the Chinese soul” or identity, it’s that event.
To be charitable to them one could say they are relatively “stable” (certainly compared to whites and blacks) and interested in harmony and continuity while also being “harsh” and, indeed, sometimes petty. They also can be quite ruthless, cunning and unscrupulous. Indeed they never had a Christian era.
In any event what other people have lived on the same land for six thousand years without really moving? Talk about blood and soil! The Chinese have that in spades.
You obviously have read some books on Chinese history and possessed a deep emotional attachment and affinity to that people. While feigning neutrality and maturity in your arguments by mentioning their “flaws and foibles” in a fleeting fashion, you still admire and swoon for the Chinese culture and history and oppose probing the “soul” of the Chinese, something you regarded as ludicrous and impposible, huh? However, the majority of your arguments here are riddled with holes of shallow observations, follies, distortions and half-truths, which I would not examine and discuss one by one here due to my limited time and energy.
Just two quick rebuttals. You said, “…hence which, upon return to China, they burned their ships and vowed never to set out for foreign lands again. If anything describes “the Chinese soul” or identity, it’s that event.” This is so absolute. The eunnuch chief Zheng He’s inability to continue his seafaring adventures was caused by a myriad of complete political and economic factors within the imperial court of Ming Dyansty and from an largely unimpressed Emperor Chengzu himself. It is true that because of mainly domestic reasons and myopic condiserations, the later emperors of the same dynasty and the succeeding dynaty i.e. the Manchurian Qing Dynasty, the last feudal dynasty of China consistently banned outward activities for commercial or other reasons, but the modern China deeply regretted and deplores that historical fact, as many Chinese are doing now. In your imagination, China and Chinese are so immutably stable and monolithic, to the point of never changing their behavioral patterns, which is simply not true.
You said, “In any event what other people have lived on the same land for six thousand years without really moving? Talk about blood and soil! The Chinese have that in spades.” Six thousand years?? Give me a break!! Even the Chinese themselves claim a number smaller that you give them credit for. In fact, the real documented history of the Chinese civilization is four thousand years or so, while in China they use the inflated number of five thousand years when bragging about their long and rich history and civilization. Meanwhile, it also must be pointed out the actual China proper, that is the traditional landmass the Han Chinese inhabited, was only half to one-third of the land that China occupies now. The rest of the land the Han Chinese annexted through invasion, forced annexation, intermarriage or other ethinic cleansing and assimilation actions throughout the history, up to this day. That is the ugly truth of the “peaceful” and “stable” Chinese in your mind!
What’s not to admire about thousands of years of one people living on the same land? The funny thing about the Chinese is that they are a very “old-fashioned” people (like how white people used to be, perhaps up to a century and a half ago). Their cities are ultramodern but their customs still reflect the themes of a Jane Austin novel. It’s like they have been “stuck” in a time rut and this has saved their civilization up to a point. Beware they copy the west too much and they’ll fall down the hole just like we have. Hence their effort to build a fortress around their country both physically and digitally.
All Chinese wars were inter-Chinese wars, internal feuds and strifes. External conquerring were achieved not by the Han Chinese, but by their FOREIGN rulers, such as Iranoaryans Saka, Türkic-Mongolian Yuan, or much later by the Manchu. Well, and Chinese cavalry always have been Türkic mercenaries, since Huns.
Thanks for your comment. To candidly repond to and argue against some of your observations in your comment,
You said, “Jewified China certainly is a threat to the collective West, but the inherent pride and strength of the Chinese and their ancient culture should not be viewed as such. Much can be learned from these people and this part of the world.” My opinion is exactly the opposite of it. A Jewified China would hardly pose any threat to the West and the White race, as a Jewified China would become culturally corrupt, vitiated, and emasculated just like today’s West and Japan (slightly less so compared to US and Western Europe), that would be ideal to get rid of this collosal menace to the West, but in reality it’s very hard to realize, because the Chinese, like Jews and Arabs and Africans, are inherently ethno-egocentrist and nationalist toward themselves, unlike the fair-minded, self-criticizing and altruistic Whites and Japanese who are more inclined to be guilt-tripped, making the infiltration and permeation of Jew-preached toxic leftist liberal values very hard to suceed in the Chinese folk society. This is indeed an enviable quality from the current plight of the West. On the other hand, it’s also exactly these racial traits, pride and strength of the Chinese, coupled and catalyzed by their vast ambition, vanity, rancor, and morbid vengefulness that make China an implacable and irreconcilable enemy and threat to the collective West.
As for the concept of “Baizuo” (a shortened form of Whit liberal/leftist), a term that Chinese, esp. its younger generation invented and used to mock and ridicule the White leftist libeals whom they found despicable, you can click on the third word in the first paragaph of this post i.e., commented (underlined and clickable) to find and read more article written by the same author in the past, in some of which he had discussed about the term, its use and implications by the Chinese. It seems that while most of Chinese uber-nationalists undoubtedly and rightfully look down upon laught at White libeals for their sanctimony and suicidal urges to care for non-White minorities and immigtants at the expense of their own survival with some even undestanding the Jewish hand pulling the strings behind the curtain, which points to their fondness of Trump for its implicit representation for the Whites interest (right or wrong), they are also celebrating the erosion and evisceration of the White nations by Jews as they believe it presents China with an excellent chance to defeat and replace the White race on this planet.
You said, “…if someone is going to come into our globalized house to clean up the mess (through “pest control”, perhaps), it would probably be the folks from the “Middle Kingdom”. My visceral reaction to your remark is that unfortunately, if one day that really happens, the one who walks into the globalized house of North America to clean up the mess, the Asiatic folks you so admire and expects from the “Middle Kingdom”, may indeed “clean up the mess” in the house, but not before they decimate, subjugate and enslave the White race. They will do the house cleaning over the cold, dead bodies of the White folks and take over the entire house.
Jewish-led White genocide is going ahead with vigor and success. The pro-Jewish antiwhite system is ending us. This system dominates “the West.”
If there are no successful challengers to the hegemony of the antiwhite, Jewish-run, genocidal “West,” that’s the end of us.
As long as this situation continues pro-Whites have no stake in the hegemony of “the West” and a great stake in the success of White challengers to the antiwhite “West.”
We shouldn’t get confused, advocating for proxies of our race like Christianity or “the West.” We have to aim for our actual genetic group survival.
A successful challenger to the White genocide system has to have things like an alternative to the ruling Jewish financial system and enough military force to hold off an American invasion or an American regime change operation.
The possible candidates are Russia. Russia may not be big enough and strong enough to challenge antiwhite hegemony, but if it isn’t there is no alternative White state that would be.
Russia is not pro-White, a situation that is bad. However Russians are White and an important part of our race, and the Russian government is pro-Slav, which is just as good as being pro-German or in favor of any other ethnic fraction of our race. So we pro-Whites have a stake in Russian survival.
For Russia to survive despite the implacable and genocidal antiwhite hatred of the Jews, Russia must have important allies, mainly important economic allies.
There is a shortage of White states able and willing to play that vital role.
China is able and willing to play that vital role. Therefore pro-Whites have an instrumental stake in the success and prosperity of China.
With due respect, what overly simplistic equations you have made, sir! Wow!
I strongly disgree. Here’s why:
No.1 , the Chinese civilization and the Chinese people, as the successor to one of the four oldest non-Western ancient civilizaitons in the world, has survived well to this day, while other three (the ancient Egyptian, the ancient Babylon, the ancient Indian) either perished or got irrecoverably eclipsed, is due to a few unique factors. Besides its huge landmass and population that makes any invader and conquerer from the outside hard to rule and dominate over it for too long, there’s the also another unparalleled and unrivaled factor of the unique ethnic and national traits of the Chinese, namely its overarching ruthlessness, unscrupulousness, duplicity and chicanery that not only will startle and stupefy the common White people, but make even the most hardened Western Machiavellians pale in contrast. The head of the White Europeans and the Japanese as the most Whites-resembling non-White people (in honesty, honor, fairness and law-abiding spirit) simply are not wired in the same way as the Chinese.
Examples about the Chinese treachery and cunningness abound in real life and I’ll only give one relatively light-hearted anecdotal example here to illustrate that point. The Chinese government likes to mouth the so-called “Win-Win” strategy when they are yearn for Western investment or cooperation on the international stage. But do you know in private what they said? Win-Win means that China Wins Twice, and this is uttered not just on the Internet space in China, but on real life occasions by their top American study expert, some one called Dr. Jin Chanrong, among other luminaries in official academia and think-tank groups.
No.2, as a matter of fact, Russia has never had China’s wholehearted back. The alliance between Russia and China is temporary, volatile and unstable, based on circumstances and contingencies. And China only support the Putin regime, not the Russian nation, and as a seasoned and informed White nationalist should know, Putin is NOT a Russian nationalist but an imperialist harboring imperalistic dreams of territorial expansion at the expense of shedding White blood of both Russian lives and Ukrainian lives. What’re more, the majority of Chinese deeply resent, hate Russia and nurse an entrenched revanchist and irredentist ambition againt Russia for the historical takeover of its alleged Northeastern land (the far East of Siberia) by the Imperial Russia in the 19th century. An uncountable number of Chinese are airing the spiteful hatred toward Russia and calling to take the land back from Russia either through future wars or massive immigtration into this sparsely populated land rich in natural resources and geostragetic value. Meanwhile, the current ChiCom regime, for all its superficial friendly gestures and material assistance to Russia (out of selfishly calculated reasons), is also trying to extort some geopolitical and resouces-linked interests from a cash-strapped, emaciated and crestfallen Russia and is encouraging Chinese peasants to emigrate en masse to Russia’s Far Eastern territory as contracted farm hands and to intermarry with Russian women, with some successes on both cases.
China is playing a big game against Russia, indeed. Russia also knows it deep in heart but cannot explicitly protest or oppose China due to obvious reasons now. But once the Russo-Ukrainian War is over the dust settles, Russia will raise its guard against China and even a new Russo-Chinese war is quite possible if China continues its advances and inroads into Russia. It is alleged that the both sides are already plotting on the scenario of a future military confrontation. Though today’s is a shadow of its Soviet past in power and prestige, this kind of hearkens back to 1970s when the ties between the two Communist brothers soured to an level of acute mutual hatred which boiled over to the brim of a nuclear war. It has long been revealed that the Soviet Union then was secretly plotting a devastaing nuclear strike against Mao’s China, only to be detected and reported to China through back doors by the globalist forces represented by the Jewish and Rockefeller East Coast elites behind the ZOG government of US who is ogling at China for its huge potential market and profits, the same force that was behind Kissinger’s and Nixon’s ice-breaking tour to China that helped release the feral Chinese beast to the civilized world. Thus the war was forestalled.
No.3, the latent and looming crack and even rupture between Russia and China brings us to the very sagacious and far-sighted strategy of Donald Trump that is to further drive a wedge between Russia and China, to reconcile with Putin’s Russia (or a Post-Putin Russia) by brokering a reconciliation between Russia and Ukraine as early as possible and then focus on the China Menace full-heartedly. To do that, Trump not only tries to de-escalate and diffuse the aminus and tension between US and Russia, but also tries to isolate China by reconciling with and winning China’s traditional communist small state allies, such as North Korea and Vietnam (both are resentful against China for the latter’s imperialist hubris and bullying stance). Trump (and perhaps Vance) and some of their advisers truly perceive China, not Russia or anybody else, as the largest existential threat to the West and this show their vision. If that is indeed his strategic planning and he will persist on following through that plan, White nationalists should fully espouse Trump’s foreign policy on Asia-Pacifics and cheer him on, as it will best stave off the China monster and its stretching claws.
“If you want to see what traditional Chinese culture was really like, you need to visit Taiwan”
I’ve been told this many times. When I first arrived to the mainland my Taiwanese friends pointed out to me all the rude, selfish, boarishness you see around you was a result of the cultural revolution. Mao and his boys really did a number on China…and I don’t see the current great helmsman doing enough to receive the accolades of so many on the “white-right” that he is reviving some sort of Neo-Confucian Taosit Reich…it’s more like a pretty well run shopping mall with occasional graft and unclear mission statements with managers who don’t know what OKRs are.
Chinese treachery and cunningnes
What the Chinese do can be seen as treacheries by IndoGermans, Türks, Japanese etc., but for the Chinese themselves there is no such thing as treachery/betrayal/break of trust. These all are stratagems, and when it is possible to get to the aims, the Chinese would do so without thinking about “amorality” for a second. This is stratagematic thinking.
the Russian government is pro-Slav
Laughed out and very loudly.
I appreciate the author’s candid portrayal of the China never exposed here. I’ve been there a few times as a family guest and treated very well yet not by everyone. Some seem more interested in a picture with the white man as the first one they may have ever seen live. I do believe that if they are given the opportunity to replace white America as the world hegemon they will do it gladly. The Chinese people are not blameless in this either. They chose communism over capitalism long ago. Why the US ever brought them out of the dark ages I’ll never understand. I guess the same money hungry forces in play today. Great piece.
Take this fellow’s piece and change “China” to “America.” Uighurs to Negros. Chinese financial depredations to those of the IMF.
Aggressiveness: Which country always has wars going and new ones in planning. which country has over seven hundred military bases everywhere. Everything this fellow says is almost exactly what the world outside of the American vassal system says about America.
With due respect, Mr. Reed, what you have just argued here concisely were irrelvant, sentimental, and logically unsound, that constitutes an dishonest attempt to deflect blame for China, regardless of being intentionaly or unwittingly.
“Take this fellow’s piece and change “China” to “America.” Uighurs to Negros. Chinese financial depredations to those of the IMF.”
Acknowledged. I also believe that the prominent international financial organizations such as IMF and World Bank, which are in the hands of anti-White, corrupt, venal and unsrcupulous bankers are conducting financial depredations on US. But does that abnegate or justify the Chinese financial predation on America? Certainly not! Not to mention that China now has presented itself as a card-carrying, flag-waving leader of globalism on Davos Forum and other venues of international high-finance and its interested is already deep connected with and woven into agencies like IMF and the forces behind them. A highly reasonable and credible conclusion is that both IMF and China are working actively against Western working class Whites in parallel and the their intentions and interests overlap.
In addition, the Chinese regime has rounded up Uighurs civilians and put them into concentration camps, slaughtered those who dared to protest or rebel, imposed forced labor and brainwashing on the rest, and ethnically cleanses and assimilates Uighurs and Tibetans through draconian measures such as forced intermarrying with Han people, forbiding them to practice their religion and use their own language in education. Are you suggesting that the American Whites are doing the same to the Negroes now?
“Aggressiveness: Which country always has wars going and new ones in planning. which country has over seven hundred military bases everywhere. Everything this fellow says is almost exactly what the world outside of the American vassal system says about America.”
Which country now has the largest Navy in the world and is still actively building more warships? Which country is quicking building up more nuclear warheads when the rest of the nuclear powers are reducing theirs? Which country has the most border disputes with other countries (India, Japan, Korea, Vietname, the Philippine…)? Which country is shamelessly claiming waters and islands hundreds of miles away from the Southern most tip of its own continental territory, ones that almost touch the homeland of another smaller country (the Philippines), as seen on the map, to be its own sovereign territories, and if the other side refused, used flagrant and brute force to bully and beat up the smaller neighbor country? Which country is building more military bases overseas at a fast pace through its debt-trap schemes (in places such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka, East Tip of Africa…)?
Also, when you said “the American vassal states”, you surely meant most democratic countries, those in the civilized world, those who at least enjoy some freedom and basic human rights (warts and all). And when you spoke about the “world outside of the (aforementioned) American vassal system”, you certainly referred to those corrupt, venal, dirt poor shithole failed countreis in Asia, Africa and Latin America who are ready to serve anyone for material benefit and thus constantly follow China’s orders and speak favorably of China in UN and on the international stage, simply because China frequently tosses them a bone or two. To borrow a cynical and derogatory proverb in Chinese to describe those countries that belong in the “world outside of the Amrican vassal system” that you seemed to like and respect, they just believe in “有奶便是娘” (as long as one has milk to feed me, she is my mother).
In addition, the Chinese regime has rounded up Uighurs civilians
Not only Uyighurs. Qazaqs too. Anyway it should be remembered here, that neither Qazaqs, nor Uyghurs are “immigrants” into the Eastern Türkestan. Not they have come there from outside to. The Han Chinese have come to them and stole Uygurian and Qazaq lands.
Wisdom or Misguidance?
Neither, nor. Just bribing. Peter Schweitzer has wrote some good books to the topic.
The Japanese and Koreans have nothing in common with the Chinese, even if their histories intertwined. The Japanese are knight, the Koreans are merchants, and the Chinese are swindlers.
I mostly agree with this article, except ‘The Japanese and Taiwanese are a quite different and better sort than the Chinese and Koreans in my long study of East Asian racial subgroups.’
Taiwanese have 89% Y haplogroup O, which is slightly higher than mainland China. Korea has much less haplogroup O, especially O2a-M324, which is the primary haplogroup of Han Chinese. The cultural differences between Koreans and Han Chinese are even more significant.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.