8 comments

1. Afterthought says:

   February 2, 2021 at 2:48 pm

   Good on you!

   Notice the resilience of the movement in the face of the panic and rage of the Enemy after Jan 6th.

   0

   0

   Reply
2. Bowden says:

   February 2, 2021 at 11:18 pm

   Excellent. This abomination of multiculturalist communism needs to end.
   Forcing people to live together is not promoting liberty or the pursuit of happiness. I’d just as easily agree with members of the black community I’ve heard expouse wants of a black ethnostate. There is a obvious apparent problem among certain ethnic groups (and political groups) that as been underlying tension over many years. What I’d actually suggest is designating zones for different people as they wish to be involved and join. Many seem to self segregate anyway it isn’t too much of a reach. The majority of the country (vast majority) would of course be open areas for all. The closed areas would still be open to all traffic just restricted in residing ethnic and cultural makeup.. I had actually divised a computer simulation plan for this which would amount to people filling out simple questionaires in which they would be informed of where they would be happiest moving to and living. Basically, around people they themselves would prefer to live around. So it would have a voluntary aspect in which over the next generation people would naturally move to where they would be most content and happy. The questions would be not just ethnicity but a multitude of general beliefs. Guidance in re-locating if you will as the best realestate agent you can have (computer algorithms). Voluntary. Yet on top of that for those predisposed to REALLY not want to be around other cultures then basically ethnic, cultural protection zones. Where these peoples culture and ethnicity is protected (not to mention easing tensions and general happiness).
   It is important we recognize peoples rights of culture, self association and determination, and ethnicity. In our rush to integrate and create multiculturalism we’ve dismissed peoples other rights and trampled on various peoples and cultures. And while most are generally content, there is still a large fraction of the populace that is not. While many speak of secession i am not so sure as of yet that would ever be necessary. But a further limitation of federal laws and more power to these zones(ethno etc states) would be necessary so they can maintain their self determination legally. People with completely different cultures, beliefs, mindsets, do not do well being infringed upon by others culture, beliefs in overarching broad federal laws. What is most odd, is forcing people together that don’t generally want to be together. Much like forced marriages of years ago except forcing not just 2 people but entire groups of people together and expecting good results. While many adapt and integrate it will never be a complete integration. Nor will we set this great example to the world in continuing down our current path, which is actually quite dangerous and reckless to all involved if the societal threads break. History does not favor our experiment nor give it good odds of sucess. People with much in common have fought wars over things. However with our current society of those with even less in common (near opposing forces) it seems we have been placed in a tinder box of some sort that would undoubtedly breakdown into chaos if tensions are stretched through any number of possible societal breakdowns. I’d consider our current predicament actually quite dangerous and irresponsible as the divisions are there even in these many years of good times. Poor times would undoubtedly unravel the society and quite unpeacefully.
   Happiness, rights, and respect of all involved.

   0

   0

   Reply
3. E says:

   February 3, 2021 at 1:04 am

   You’ve lost 10% of your referrals – probably around 20,000 unique visitors – in December because there’s a trivial error in your RSS.

   Orbán with his potbelly would jump three tripple toe loops in a row for 20,000 sympathizers.

   Get serious.

   https://www.similarweb.com/website/counter-currents.com/#referrals

   https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcounter-currents.com%2Ffeed%2F

   0

   0

   Reply
   1. Greg Johnson says:

      February 3, 2021 at 1:45 am

      What device/app are you using to read RSS?

      0

      0

      Reply
      1. E says:

         February 3, 2021 at 3:10 am

         Feedly. I suspected censorship and tried a couple of others, some work, some don’t. The best strategy is to work on the feed template until it passes W3C validation.

         Taking the string “Counter-Currents” out of line 1 would probably make it parse in most readers.

         Before:

         
Counter-Currents


         After:

         Suggestion: Every time you or your authors complain about tech platform censorship, plug newsletter and RSS. Make it a rule.

         (Platforms were built on people’s unwillingness to spend 5 minutes to learn RSS.)

         0

         0

         Reply
         1. E says:

            February 3, 2021 at 3:13 am

            Code filter doesn’t work. Try again with square brackets:

            Before:

            [?xml version=”1.0″ encoding=”UTF-8″?]Counter-Currents[rss version=”2.0″…][/rss]

            After:

            [?xml version=”1.0″ encoding=”UTF-8″?][rss version=”2.0″…][/rss]

            0

            0

            Reply
            1. Greg Johnson says:

               February 3, 2021 at 2:17 pm

               Once we get this fixed, would you be willing to write a tutorial on RSS feeds that anybody can read in five minutes?

               0

               0
4. J says:

   February 5, 2021 at 10:48 pm

   Greg, the international traffic rankings are intriguing. Would you be able to share more information about the respective numbers of international visitors for greater context?

   0

   0

   Reply