Counter-Currents
3,913 words
Czech version here, Hungarian version here
See also the follow-up article here
The mass-marketing of interracial relationships, particularly white women with black men, has become so ubiquitous and so militant, even the least observant members of our culture have begun to notice. Walking through a mall recently I noticed three large marketing images of couples in three different stores. Two of the three were interracial couples, depicting a white woman and black man; the third couple was white. Perhaps what struck me as most peculiar was the fact that the city where I was shopping, whites make up about 97% of the population, blacks are less than 2%. I wondered if the purpose of “diverse” advertising was to sell more products, or really to indoctrinate, to condition, and signal how “progressive” they are.
Based on small glimpses of culture, one might assume half or more of all relationships involve some sort of race-mixing. If a person who had no information about the US or Europe were to see our television, magazine, billboard, and storefront advertisements, he might assume there were virtually zero normal white men anywhere to be found. The combination of white women with black men is hands down, the most common mixed-race couple depicted in advertising; that combination will be the focus of this essay.
I thought about the probability that two of the three advertisement couples I saw in the mall that afternoon were there by mere coincidence. Between men and women, white, black, Hispanic, Asian, and “other,” there are 25 possible combinations of couples. Twenty of which are interracial. Here are the possible interracial combinations.
Mixed-Race Couple Combinations
White women: black man, Asian man, Hispanic man, other man.
White men: black woman, Asian woman, Hispanic woman, other woman.
Black man: Asian woman, Hispanic woman, other woman.
Black woman: Asian man, Hispanic man, other man.
Asian man: Hispanic woman, other woman.
Asian woman: Hispanic man, other man.
Hispanic man: other woman.
Hispanic woman: other man.
If the “diversity” in advertising was truly about appealing to the greatest number of customers or potential customers, showing white women with black men at such a high level, seems to be a very odd strategy. To focus so much on one combination, while ignoring so many others – there simply must be some other goal beyond selling merchandise.
Outcomes
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here
There is a notable and interesting body of research on interracial relationships and marriages, it is not exhaustive by any means, but we can synthesize the available data to form an accurate view of such relationships. Pew Research 2012 conducted a large study of interracial marriage that provides a considerable amount of data. Since 1980, the total percent of interracial marriages has risen from 3.2% to 8.4%. Of new marriages, the rate rose from 6.7% to 15.1%. In 2010 the most common intermarriage was white/Hispanic, at 43.3%, other mixed at 30.4%, white/Asian at 14.4% and white/black, the least common, at 11.9%. Not all interracial relationships, of course, are marriages, but we can use the marriage data to reasonably extrapolate the information to the wider society and relationships.
As of 2010, whites, on average, were the least likely to marry outside of their race, less than 10% of whites intermarry, while Hispanics, blacks, and Asians are all two to three times more likely to intermarry.[1]
In terms of combined median incomes of interracial marriages, black husbands with white wives earned the lowest amount of any other combination. The black husband and white wife combination were also the least educated. Of the interracial combinations, marriages between whites and blacks were found to be the least stable, and the most likely to result in divorce. The divorce rate is higher in all interracial marriages for white women relative to a white marriage.[2]
A study of over two million online dating interactions revealed distinct racial preferences between groups. White women responded most frequently to white men, and least frequently to black men.[3] In light of this data it is all the more bizarre that the combination of a white woman with a black man is seen so frequently in advertising.
Sexually transmitted disease rates per the 2016 Center for Disease Control speak for themselves.[4] [5] [6]
A 2015 study examined the outcomes of women that have children with black men, the results were staggering. Currently, 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, however when the mother is white and the father black, the rate jumps to 97%. 98% of white mothers studied reported the father does not support their children financially, 97% report the father is not in the child’s life, and 97% of the women have used welfare to help support themselves and their children. Only 10% of women that have children with black men out of wedlock end up marrying. The vast majority of white women that have children with black men live far below the poverty line.[7]
Not bloody likely
A 2013 study of intimate partner violence in relationships, surveyed nearly ten-thousand people, the authors hypothesized that interracial couples would experience higher levels of violence compared to intra-racial relationships. They found that compared to white relationships, both black couples and interracial couples experience statistically significant higher levels of relationship violence. Intimate partner violence is classified as threats, physical, or emotional violence between two people in a committed relationship. The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control estimates that relationship violence costs around $4.1 billion a year in medical and mental health care costs.[8]
Unlikely
Attitudes
Among whites in 1958, only 4% approved interracial marriages between whites and blacks; in 2007, 75% of whites reported they approve of such unions. Historically and contemporarily, blacks and Hispanics have always held a higher approval rating of interracial marriages.[9]
From a 2011 Pew Research study, 40% of whites, 51% of blacks, and 48% of Hispanics report that more people of different races marrying is a change for the better in society. 12% of whites, 8% of blacks, and 9% of Hispanics say it is for the worse, and the remaining of those surveyed said there is no difference. The younger the cohort, the more likely they were to say the increase of interracial marriage is for the better, liberals were more likely than conservatives to say interracial marriages is for the better, and college graduates were also more likely to support the notion.[10]
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Toward a New Nationalism here.
As a side note, my personal opinion from a considerable amount of spent time in academia is that “more educated” members of our society are not more “open-minded” than “less educated” members. It is my contention that on average, the longer one spends in academia, the more apt one is to be indoctrinated by critical theory. There is likely also a self-selection bias at work as well. Those who are more likely to buy into the narrative of critical theory, are more likely to thrive in an environment that echoes their sentiments.
Pew Research 2010 found that 69% of people surveyed said that single women having children is a bad thing, 43% say unmarried couples raising children is a bad thing, yet only 14% say interracial marriage is a bad thing.[11] There is something oddly ironic about being in favor of interracial relationships, while at the same time abhorring the logical outcomes of those relationships.
Both Pew Research and Gallup’s latest findings report the majority of US citizens approve of interracial marriage and relationships. Although these are generally self-reporting surveys and anonymous, a study of brain scans suggests that there is a social desirability bias coming into play. Social desirability bias is the tendency of survey and study participants to reply to socially contentious questions in a way that is socially and publicly acceptable, even when the surveys are anonymous.
A 2017 study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology looked at insula activity in the brain when participants viewed images of interracial couples compared to same-race couples. Insula activation is responsible for a variety of emotions. Evidence shows that insula activity is present when a person experiences disgust and is thought to be a reliable marker of both disgust and aversion. The study found statistical significance between insula activation of participants looking at same-race couples compared to interracial couples. Despite a minority of participants explicitly stating they disagree with interracial dating and marriage, the electroencephalogram (EEG), told a different story.
This study also used an implicit association task (IAT) to measure response times of participants in categorizing interracial couples and same-race couples with either a silhouette of a human or a silhouette of an animal. Participants were placed in two conditions, one primed with disgusting images, the other with positive images. Researchers found that all participants showed an implicit bias towards matching interracial couples with animals, and the condition primed to be disgusted was even faster, showing a greater implicit bias against interracial couples. There was both a neural reaction of disgust and an implicit reaction of disgust, to interracial couples. The authors write in the abstract of this paper that “These findings are particularly concerning, given evidence of antisocial reactions (e.g., aggression, perpetration of violence) to dehumanized targets.”[12]
The Psychology
You can buy Greg Johnson’s It’s Okay to Be White here.
We now know that whites are the least likely to marry outside of their race. We know that when white women marry outside of their race they are more likely to be abused, to become a single-mothers, live in poverty, and that whites dating outside of their race exposes us to a higher chance of contracting a sexually transmitted disease. We know that despite the feigned acceptance, white people show a legitimate disgust response to interracial relationships. We also know that despite the barrage of “diversity” in films, television, and in advertisements, same-race couples are still the most common, by far. So, what’s the purpose of the blatant propaganda?
David Vinjamuri for Forbes writes; “What’s the advantage of a wider variety of gender, ethnicity and sexual presence represented in media and advertising? Simply put, we are more likely to identify with someone that looks like us.”[13]
Michelle Castillo for CNBC suggests that Americans want even more “diversity” in ads, where she cites a survey of 2,000 people, where 66% report diversity in advertising is a factor to consider when purchasing a product.[14]
These are excuses, at best. We still have not answered why we see the very particular arrangement of white women with black men, time and time again. I do not believe for a second that interracial advertising under the guise of “diversity” is about selling clothes or laundry detergent or cereal. It is propaganda through and through. The purpose of which is to present a distorted worldview, to humiliate, to mock, and to make complacent. White men are the last vanguard against this occupation of a hostile elite. White women are displayed with non-white men not to sell items, but as a tactic of psychological warfare against our civilization. Very rarely anymore are white men portrayed in a favorable light, they are often the overweight, goofy, clumsy, half-wit that relies on women and non-whites to save the day. From films to television to advertisements, this is an increasingly common anti-white canard.
The increasing acceptance of interracial relationships over the last 70 years has not been a function of anything other than increased propaganda efforts. The outcomes are socially and individually undesirable, little if any good comes from promoting white women to date and marry outside of their race. What we are seeing is a systemic attack on white identity, we are seeing but one of many aspects of the war on whites becoming a creeping normality in the West.
The psychological effects of advertising have been well-documented. Advertising has the ability to make people chose an inferior product simply by manipulating the affective conditioning.[15] Studies suggest the average American is exposed to as many as 5,000 advertisements in a day. The American Psychological Association has concluded there is a link between unhealthy food advertisements to childhood obesity, and a link between tobacco and alcohol advertisements to underage smoking and drinking. The APA found these effects to be so strong they have called for strict regulations on advertisements that are marketed to children.[16]
The power of advertising is so strong, it has the ability to override central-route processing and rationality, to sow subconscious discord, persuade us to make irresponsible decisions.[17] Further, advertising has the power to condition us to be more accepting and to usher in social change. The prevalence of mixed-race couples and an increase of LGBT representation in advertisements has in no small way changed social perception.[18] Although visceral reactions of disgust remain, outward social attitudes have become accepting of all forms of degeneracy and social decay.
The Danger
You can buy Greg Johnson’s In Defense of Prejudice here
White people are not the only ones seeing constant images of white women with black men plastered across the Occident. These images have an effect on black men as well. They are being told by the film industry, TV, and advertising, that it is not only natural, but also common that white women are choosing black men. I have no doubt that this imagery plays no small part in the increased rate of victimization white women face at the hands of non-white men. These advertisements send a clear message to black men: white women desire you. This plays out in reality when black men, despite being conditioned by advertising to believe white women desire them, are rejected by white women in reality. They often become angry and lash out at the women (as seen in this video),[19] believing they are taking “what is theirs.” Nearly 100% of interracial rapes are white women being raped by non-white men (National Crime Victimization Survey, 2008, Table 42). These advertising images, which have no small part in warping mentality, not only promote a dysgenic society, they place our people in a grave danger.
Purveyors
The most recent and perhaps belligerent example of anti-white propaganda came from Netflix via a set of three commercials for the company. The series of the three commercials is titled The Couple, which features a white woman and a black man. The commercial “Open Relationship” from the series depicts two couples, an interracial couple, and a white couple, where the white man is depicted as small, weak, insecure, “unprogressive,” and “closed-minded.” His white girlfriend quickly decides to cast him aside to spend the evening with the interracial couple, as the black man quite literally steals the man’s girlfriend in front of him, humiliating him. This is a commercial, with the alleged intent to encourage more people to subscribe to Netflix.
Let’s Netflix and cuck
It came to my attention that this commercial was not a result of white ethnomasochism, but perhaps something far more disquieting. HLG Studios out of Los Angeles was behind the production of the three commercials. HLG has worked on advertising campaigns for a myriad of national brands, from fast food chains, to banks, technology companies, and clothing retailers. HLG Studios was founded by Yuri Baranovsky, the same man who directed Netflix’s race-mixing, anti-white propaganda pieces. Baranovsky is Jewish.[20]
This revelation piqued my interest and sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole in the advertising industry. I quickly found that the marketing industry is very much akin to the media industry. Just four mega-corporations control the vast majority of all advertising agencies. The Omnicom Group of New York, WPP of London, Publicis of Paris, and Interpublic of New York are the key corporations in the West. Dentsu of Tokyo is the next largest group, and fifth globally.
The New York Times states that these companies are so powerful “they can indirectly set network television schedules and starve magazines to death or help them to flourish,” by deciding how and when to spend advertising dollars.[21] Each company owns dozens if not hundreds of smaller agencies; Omnicom has bought over 150 firms alone.
CEO John Wren, of Irish descent, currently heads Omnicom Group. Omnicon was founded by Allen Rosenshine, Keith Reinhard, and John Bernbach, all three Jewish.[22]
Long-standing CEO of Publicis (1987–2017) has been Maurice Lévy, who cited his Rabbi grandfather as his greatest inspiration.[23] Lévy has been honored by the Anti-Defamation League, for his work fighting anti-Semitism, and his relentless promotion of “diversity”.[24]
WPP of London was founded and is currently run by Martin Sorrell, of Jewish descent.[25]
Chairman and CEO of the Interpublic Group (IPG), is Michael Isor Roth. I found no mention of his ethnicity. Roth did however condemn the “white supremacist ideology” at Charlottesville and founded the whole event to be “deeply disturbing,” as he wrote in an internal memo to 50,000 IPG employees. Roth further wrote that the actions cannot be tolerated, and that of course “diversity” is an American value. Finally, he suggested the events at Charlottesville are not political issues, but “an issue of basic humanity, and standing up for what is right.”[26] I agree with the sentiments of Roth. This whole movement really isn’t political in many ways. This is about basic humanity and fighting for what is right. It just so happens, that some of us do not see our cultural genocide and dispossession as an issue beyond basic humanity. We have the right to exist, whether Roth and his ilk like it or not.
For a brief moment, I thought I was on to something. There seems to be a disproportionate number of Jews and those with Jewish sympathies involved in advertising. From small start-up firms to multi-billion-dollar corporations, all of which are promoting hostile anti-white canards, while praising “diversity” and “inclusion.” I’m sure it’s just another coincidence.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Confessions of a Reluctant Hater here
If you wanted to destroy a civilization, how would you go about it? If you wanted to create dysgenic chaos in a society, what would be your weapon? To destroy our civilization, you would want to start by destroying one of the cornerstones of our culture, the nuclear family. And what better way to destroy the white nuclear family, than to encourage white people, especially white women, to mate with foreign men that are unlikely to support them or raise their children. If you wanted to create a chaotic society that is easy to lord over, you would ensure that the children are raised by the state, the women are dependent upon the state, and that the men were marginalized and seen as social pariahs by their own people. What better way to destroy a people than to promote a relationship that can never produce white children and that is by nature dysgenic?
The media, the press, and advertisers have created a culture of anti-white hatred. These companies are not simply promoting “diversity” and trying to appeal to a wider range of consumers, they are promoting the increased abuse of white women. They are promoting heightened rates of communicable diseases amongst our people. They are promoting a generation of poor, fatherless children, where our tax dollars will be funneled. They are not just trying to sell products, they are trying to recreate a nation, our nation, without us. They are saying they do not want white children to be made. They are telling white men they have no place in society. And that is where we come in.
We need to stand guard with unwavering and watchful eyes, and shine a light on the constant barrage of attacks. Every single time I come across an advertisement that highlights “diversity” in an absurd way or promotes miscegenation, I make a point to share it online and with my friends and family. I personally take note of companies that insist on promoting miscegenation and do not spend my money with them. If they want the “diverse” consumer, they can have them. When the hostile elite sends a message that young white men have no place in society, it is our job to be there for them. To give them a place and more importantly a purpose. The future of civilization, the future for our people, is only being offered by one group of people, and that is us. We are in many ways the last vanguard against a system that would greatly prefer our extinction.
Every film that has a hostile anti-white message should be reviewed, critiqued, and dissected by those of us writing articles and creating podcasts. We have the intellectual ability to develop our very own critiques, to be the warriors against this cultural insurrection, and to let the current occupation know they can write us out of their silly commercials, awful sitcoms, degenerate films, and miscegenation promoting magazine ads, but that is all they will be able to accomplish.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Truth, Justice, & a Nice White Country here
And one last thing, as for Dentsu, the Japanese advertising giant? Their entire history of executives has been Japanese.[27] Every July new employees and newly-promoted executives of the company travel to Mount Fuji to climb the mountain together. A company tradition dating back to the 1920s. Somewhere in this story of race-mixing propaganda amid the throes of degeneracy, there is a profound lesson to be learned from the Japanese. Although they are not without fault (Dentsu has a reputation of overworking their employees), there is something to be admired about a group of people honoring tradition, country, nature, nation, and each other.
And for us? We have our own Mount Fuji ahead of us, rising with the dawn and reaching towards the sky, waiting to be conquered. In a hostile environment that would much prefer we lie down and accept fate. I submit instead, we pull each other up that mountain — as we always have.
See also the follow-up article here
Notes
[1] Wang, Wendy. “Chapter 4: Public Attitudes on Intermarriage.” Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project, 15 Feb. 2012, www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/chapter-4-public-attitudes-on-intermarriage/.
[2] Zhang, Yuanting, and Jennifer Van Hook. “Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples.” Journal of Marriage and Family, Blackwell Publishing Inc, 27 Jan. 2009, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00582.x/full.
[3] King, Ritchie. “The uncomfortable racial preferences revealed by online dating.” Quartz, Quartz, 20 Nov. 2013, qz.com/149342/the-uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-by-online-dating/.
[4] “2016 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 26 Sept. 2017, www.cdc.gov/std/stats16/minorities.htm.
[5] “Genital Herpes.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 22 Sept. 2017, www.cdc.gov/std/herpes/stats.htm.
[6] “HIV/AIDS.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 29 Nov. 2017, www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html.
[7] Calloway, Tiffany N. “Ninety Two Percent: Examining the Birth Trends, Family Structure, Economic Standing, Paternal Relationships, and Emotional Stability of Biracial Children with African American Fathers.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, doi:10.2139/ssrn.2625893.
[8] Martin, Brittny A., et al. “Intimate Partner Violence in Interracial and Monoracial Couples.” Family Relations, vol. 62, no. 1, 2013, pp. 202–211., doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00747.x.
[9] Gallup, Inc. “Most Americans Approve of Interracial Marriages.” Gallup.com, 16 Aug. 2007, news.gallup.com/poll/28417/most-americans-approve-interracial-marriages.aspx.
[10] Wang, Wendy. “Chapter 4: Public Attitudes on Intermarriage.” Pew Research Center’s Social & Demographic Trends Project, 15 Feb. 2012, www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/chapter-4-public-attitudes-on-intermarriage/.
[11] Ibid.
[12] Skinner, Allison L., and Caitlin M. Hudac. “Yuck, you disgust me!” Affective bias against interracial couples.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 68, 2017, pp. 68–77., doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.008.
[13] Vinjamuri, David. “Diversity In Advertising Is Good Marketing.” Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 20 Mar. 2017, www.forbes.com/sites/davidvinjamuri/2015/12/11/diversityinadsisgoodmarketing/#376232b54248.
[14] Castillo, Michelle. “Study: Americans want more diversity in ads.” CNBC, CNBC, 7 Mar. 2016, www.cnbc.com/2016/03/07/study-americans-want-more-diversity-in-ads.html.
[15] Markman, Art. “What Does Advertising Do?” Psychology Today, Sussex Publishers, 31 Aug. 2010, www.psychologytoday.com/blog/ulterior-motives/201008/what-does-advertising-do.
[16] Dittmanin, Meliss. “Protecting Children from Advertising.” Monitor on Psychology, American Psychological Association, June 2004, www.apa.org/monitor/jun04/protecting.aspx.
[17] Tytyk, Kimberly. “The Psychology of Advertising,Manipulation in Advertising | StopAd.” StopAd Blog: Practical Content and Insights, Not Just about Ads, StopAd, 323 Oct. 2017, stopad.io/blog/manipulating-maslow-how-advertising-is-hijacking-our-heads-and-making-us-unhappy.
[18] Scheybani, Omid. “How Advertising Has Become an Agent of Social Change.” Medium, Medium, 11 Feb. 2015, medium.com/@moonstorming/how-advertising-has-become-an-agent-of-social-change-148aa0ef303a.
[19] Black immigrants in France hit white girl for not giving number, https://vimeo.com/91783904
[20] “Biography Yuri Baranovsky.” IMDb, IMDb.com, www.imdb.com/name/nm3060354/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm.
[21] [21] Elliott, Stuart. “Advertising’s Big Four: It’s Their World Now.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 30 Mar. 2002, www.nytimes.com/2002/03/31/business/advertising-s-big-four-it-s-their-world-now.html.
[22] Delo, Cotton. “DDB’s Keith Reinhard on the Origins of Omnicom – Beet.TV.” Beet.TV – The Root to the Media Revolution, 5 Aug. 2015, www.beet.tv/2015/08/reinhard-ddb-2.html.
[23] Thejc.com, www.thejc.com/news/world/maurice-levy-s-inspiration-his-grandfather-rabbi-1.43194.
[24] “French Advertising Magnate Honored By ADL.” Anti-Defamation League, www.adl.org/news/press-releases/french-advertising-magnate-honored-by-adl.
[25] Bunder, Leslie. “Top Jewish Earners.” Top Jewish Earners, 11 Mar. 2003, www.somethingjewish.co.uk/articles/553_top_jewish_earners.htm.
[26] Coffee, Patrick. “IPG’s Michael Roth Becomes First Holding Company CEO to Speak Out on Charlottesville Violence via Internal Memo.” AgencySpy, AgencySpy, www.adweek.com/agencyspy/ipgs-michael-roth-becomes-first-holding-company-ceo-to-speak-out-on-charlottesville-via-internal-memo/135876.
[27] “Corporate History.” Corporate History – WHO WE ARE – DENTSU INC., www.dentsu.com/whoweare/sp/summary/corporatehistory.html.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
101 comments
Makes me want to vomit. The act of race-mixing with blacks and other non-Whites. And those responsible for this genocidal agenda make me want to round them up, put them all in one place and NUKE that place.
It would be nice if all the jews would move back to Israel, and we could do it.
Peter Quint: You can bet the jews would try to take all the wealth that they have raked off of productive people’s work. I wouldn’t allow this if I were President; I’d make them leave empty handed.
Actually, if I were a President (in a future fantasy world, he! he!) I wouldn’t let them leave at all; I would put them to work somehow.
Maybe use them for manual labor building a moat/entrenchment/no man’s land across part of the Florida peninsula and use the land south of it as a dumping ground for the non-Whites (including the jews who just built it) who will not leave North America willingly and go to other continents; cut off all food and coal supplies to the area.
Maybe put them into the infantry when it comes time to invade Mexico in order to take it over and fix it so it takes back all of its (and all of latin america’s) wet backs who’ve invaded over the last century. Make those jews do the initial fighting instead of getting our best White men killed/maimed like has happened in previous wars.
But hey, that’s just me. I’m just spit balling. For now.
Whenever I see any of these FAKE, FORCED and totally FRAUDULENT interracial commercial con-jobs I ask “why”? And the only reason I can come up with given that the DEFINITE prevailing social/cultural sentiment is AGAINST race-mixing is the no-longer subtle political agenda to destroy whites around the planet.
I live in a state that is easily over 95% white and seldom see interracial couples, but when I do it is when I drive by the welfare office or on the evening news when there’s yet another homicide at one of the local low-income housing projects. And given (per this article) that 98% of white women who “cross the racial line” wind-up alone to raise their mulattos, the anti-white agenda of these corporate Hate-America-First, the anti-white agenda becomes even more blatant and absurd.
I just don’t get it…do these corporate “titans” really think that they are serving their companies well by catering to a FAKE demographic that doesn’t exist and where it does, it exists in abject failure??? SMH
The bi-racial and gay couple BS being pushed in advertising is enough to make a maggot gag!
I noticed that as well. And not only are they doing this but they are also pushing this diversity in our schools. I read an article about a teacher was having a kindergartner read a transgender ABC book. Which had B is for Bi and so on. And now all the white teachers are required for taking their white privilege courses. That is where we need to start is tearing down the school systems that are indoctrinating our kids.
I have also noticed the prevalence of black scientists, providers, doctors, professors, customers and good Samaritans in advertisements (including movies).
In everyday reality, the most frequent combination to be seen by walking down the street is black male – white woman. This is borne out by the pictures accompanying the article, as well as everyday personal observation.
Apparently, white women are the link in the chain that is weakest for racial cohesion.
Very, very rarely have I seen a Black – Asian couple, and the one time that I can remember clearly was a black male and an Asian female.
Asians do not really seem to exist in the advertisement campaign:
It is always blacks in the foreground and perhaps a white person in the background. Look also at advertisements of universities, institutions, banks, hospitals:
The lead-scientist, the doctor in the foreground, the important person is mostly a black person.
Of the 25 race combinations brought up in the article, it would be interesting to compare the correlation between racial reality and advertisorial practice.
Actually white women are less likely than white men to date outside their race. They need more propaganda to do it. But it is worth it, because a woman can be a mother far fewer times than a man can be a father. Therefore, women are less expendable than men from the point of view of preserving our race. So white women are naturally the number one target of a campaign of genocide against us.
Another factor ro consider: in my region one sees mixed race couples with children and the white female is always obese. I wonder if unattractive white women choose black fathers for their children because they cannot land a white man for the task. The black man gains caste by fathering children on a white woman. Both win, according to their own logic.
You are ignoring One Night Stands. White women will casually sleep with blacks. They probably won’t have children with these men but they’ll risk having an abortion.
Vortrekker: I wish there could be a national data base of mudsharks and coal burners. A White man has to be rather low/base/mean to marry, have children, with a White female who does this. I wouldn’t even touch one of them sexually.
I know it is unrealistic to catch all of them, since many White females who do such a thing probably do it often on the sly. Even identifying all the ones who are public about it would be a county/city by county/city, state by state effort. Maybe copying the IRS foundation and structure would be successful. I do know that one particular group to watch would be the college co-ed sect.
This is great content. This is what we should be talking about. From my own intuitive observations, the white women who pair with black men are often obese. Blacks don’t mind fat women the way whites do, bc most black women are fat, and whatever the statistics claim, it’s almost always a black male with a white female.
There is a suburb of New Orleans called Kenner near where I live—it’s where the airport is. Traditionally it’s been lower class white predominantly, although there are some tony parts. Recently I went to the large Walmart there and was treated to a scene right out of mos eisly cantina. It’s at least half Hispanic. Multiple white/black and white/Hispanic couplings. Big obviously first gen mullatto teenagers. This is a place that was almost 100% white before 2000. The transformation is real and progressing rapidly; I’m glad in a way that I have no children.
I reread the second part with greater attention. I think this is why we are having these ructions of young white male violence of late, such as the school shooters and the Austin bomber. White males, particularly those of lower caste, have no real place in the society that is forming, as you say. They feel cheated by society, and react in a violent inappropriate manner.
Many years ago (I don’t know on what website and by whom but I think it was some anonymous NatSoc psychologist), I once read an article the thesis of which was that a lot of spree killing is at least partially caused by interracial couples in media and advertising and the promotion of non-whites basically everywhere in general. The article argued that a lot of these killers were racially conscious as could be seen from their manifestos and so forth, and that their unconscious mind was basically interpreting all the miscegenation/non-white promotion as having been conquered by a foreign tribe, requiring a violent retaliation.
I read this article before I was even “redpilled” or cared about race and politics at all, but never forgot it because it was interesting.
USbank is another corporation that endlessly promotes miscegenation, every time I go to their site that is all you see. I have noticed an increase in the past two years of white male, and black female pairings on television. If “Chinese Maiden” is reading this I would like to ask you if the jews are promoting Chinese women with black males on television over there?
I have observed since when Obama was in office it has been ramped up dramatically. Now its on TV every single night and pretty much in every commercial. If you did not now know that America was majority white (for now) you would think the country was majority black.
This is being done by the usual group that shall remain nameless. If you call them out you will immediately be labeled. Thats how they keep everyone in line even though people dont like it. People are afraid of being labeled. This I can say – people are nowhere near as tolerant as these studies and polls suggest. White women who go out with black men are labeled as damaged. And they know it. White men dont want white women who have been with black men. Women know this quite openly and will go to any lengths to hide it.
This is a war, make no mistake. They know that the white population is waking up. And are frantic to keep the remaining whites in line. However when liberals start to comment on it and noticing it than you know its over the top. And its definitely over the top.
What is being done to America is what was done in Germany during the Weimar period. Read up on the debauchery and debasement of German culture. Its the same cast of characters as always.
Is Michael Isor Roth, chairman and CEO of Interpublic Group (IPG), which is engaged in anti-White advertisement, Jewish ? The last name Roth, though often used by Jews, is not exclusively Jewish. It is German and so is the name Isor. So the names cannot give us a clue. There is no Wikipedia page about this individual either, but if you search his name in Google, images you see a face that resembles Charles Kushner, father of Ivanka Trump’s Jewish husband Jared Kushner. Michael Isor Roth’s face looks definitely Jewish. The war against Whites is Jewish, no doubt about it.
Yes,, you don’t know whether to be outraged or stunned or both at the white presenting blacks in lab coats or cashmere sweaters behaving like white people. It is true some blacks do like to LARP as whites, and a few lost soul whites vice versa but the reality falls far short. I have no doubt young white girls are fooled by this and believe also the accompanying image of the cucked, idiot white male . I ignore all ads and limit TV to travel docs (as long as they are not fronted by a lefty type – sadly not uncommon) but vulnerable young whites lap this vile propaganda up. I fear for the white children being born now. In Australia (which timidly offered to take some SA farmers) the left are busy promoting the “myth” of farm murders. God go with you, whites.
I thought taking the harassed Boer farmers as refugees was Peter Dutton’s best idea yet. Interesting how the globalist left, usually not too worried about what actually constitutes a ‘refugee’, suddenly wanting to get very specific about definitions.
I’d love to see RAAF troop carriers sent to South Africa to relocate people in white squatter camps – like the one at Munsieville – en masse to Australia. With a corresponding reduction in the number of economic migrants posing as refugees from elsewhere, of course.
“the left are busy promoting the “myth” of farm murders”.
To think there was I time when I did not believe in evil. Now I know better.
The abandoned Black women must find those ads offensive.
Yes, this actually really angers black women. You can see black women constantly raving on twitter when a black guy is with a white woman. Several of black panther’s stars were criticized by black women for dating whites
What makes you think that the black femal has been abandoned? Are you suggesting that the hyper-androgenic, low-executive function, sexually incontinent black male can keep it in his pants?
The black buck stud is used as a psychological motif for at once marginalising and denigrating Whites and this is the basis of their Psy.Op. arsenal.
It is telling it is particularly White females who are targetted and manipulated into accepting this state of affairs – it plays to whatever ‘daddy issues’ might be at play, and also lends a certain frisson to the illicit sexual encounters. I have also noticed that the White female will often flaunt the sexual transgression – goading and baiting conscious and awake White males to retaliate appropriately.
Also, the cocky, arrogant and self-regarding black male starts to believe the hostile interloper elite’s propaganda, feeding the narcissistic self-regards that inheres to their psychological makeup.
Ultimately, people have a choice as to how they respond to this stimulus and I think that if we are ever in a position to do so, we should make a note of the White females who have transgressed this most fundamental and profound interdict of our society and our racial future.
How do we get the media back? This is BS! I’ve be Calling out these commercials for over a frickin year! We need to start spreading the word, these apes are useless…..all the do is fuck and leave, we need to bring that to the world!
Thank you R. Houck. High quality and well sourced articles like this make for premium red pilling. Grateful for your efforts.
I’ve been wondering if anyone else noticed this. I’m glad I’m not alone. While I always expected that there was collusion between a few advertisers, they couldn’t get away with it if all the companies that order these ads didn’t buy into this type of messaging.
I’ve also always wondered if black women ever get pissed off about this. They should.
Anyway, some other things to look for are the more subtle variations: a white woman alone but with mixed race kids. The ambiguous couple with 2 white women and white man and a black man. Then there’s the commercials with every race and gender minus white males. When white males are featured, it’s often as a senior citizen, gay, or handicapped. Or more likely, playing the role of clown, criminal, or idiot.
At one time I shopped at a US-based website that mostly specialized in Euro military surplus clothing and equipment. They had a bag I was interested in and to illustrate the utility of the bag they had photos of a purple african and a Blonde woman cavorting around with it. I never shopped there again of course but was curious why they would assume the sorts of people who buy European military surplus items would also be drawn to such images. Once something enters the mainstream it is unthinkingly taken up by almost everyone.
No way is it more tragic to lose Germany and Sweden than Britain and France. We deserve a homeland as much as anyone else and If you think you can get by fine without us you are wrong.
“Fellow white Briton” by any chance?
Great read!
This is war. No doubt about it. All Jewish influence must be purged.
They should all be forcefully expelled from the West and all ties with Israel should be severed for good.
One of the NAACP’s most important campaigns in the 1950s and the 1960s was banning degrading images of Blacks in the media. Getting rid of “blackface” and the “coon” stereotypes were a major focus of their efforts.
They were extremely successful. Perhaps Whites can take a page or two from their playbook.
As much as we loathe miscegenation, the greatest threat to the white birthrate is white female careerism. I’m not talking about a white woman working just to pay the bills, but the increasing amount of white girls who want to pursue a professional career and delay raising children.
This is attack from all fronts. It is our job as mothers to raise future generations that value family and see the value of their own race.
For my part I’ve done what I can to counter this, but I’m extremely pessimistic about blacks and the future of America.
You see, we largely inhabit a fantasy media reality as it is now, anyway. We drift further and further from reality. As this occurs, it takes events to shock people back to reality, but then we go right back into our slumber.
And yes, blacks can run fast and can be very athletic. While having low intelligence. The setup is almost perfect to use them as a biological weapon.
Until I see white people refusing to go to basketball or football games, or refusing to listen to rap, I have no hope. To combat blacks, you have to defund their heroes and culture. Unless you do that, the media can always portray them as athletic, cool, hip, etc. And then more and more women fall down the rabbit hole never to recover.
Excellent point! Here’s an example in the usa where a woman has her head bashed in by 2 black sisters w/baseball bats.
The black tries to state she called her racist words naturally the white woman denies being racist.
The power of the media is so great that the white woman was wearing a shirt promoting a black rapper!
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/26/florida-woman-savagely-beaten-with-baseball-bats-in-alleged-road-rage-attack/amp/?source=images
Dolph: Well said!! Unless it is an all White high school team, I wouldn’t have much to do with any football/basketball. Matter of fact, I would teach any children of mine to eschew those two sports because of the possibility that a female child might grow up and fall for the propaganda of “getting wit a brudda”. I would also go so far as to inculcate in my children’s mind a dislike of any team sports or even group activities. Only individual pursuits, sports or otherwise.
In the ’90s, John birdman Bryant called it the Jewish war against gentiles and not the war on whites. He meant specifically Jews attacking whites.
Jews and their control of the weaponized media are the visible face of the on-going White genocide, of that there can be no doubt, but I suspect they receive approval and support at the highest levels of politics and government. Bribery and threats can only partly explain their apparent immunity to criticism and government censure. It almost appears the non-Jewish elite are using Jews and their hatred of European people as a convenient tool to achieve the political and cultural goals the elite wish to force on an unwilling population.
Coudenhove-Kalergi and his 1920s blueprint devised to convert Europe to an Afro-Islamic extension on the Mid-East is coming widely known in WN circles, but what is less recognized is the long term support Kalergi received from that creepy old aristo Otto von Habsburg. We in our ignorance would expect aristocrats like the Habsburgs to look with fatherly affection on the peoples of ‘old Europe’, but that is evidently not the case. The old money aristocracy appear to have formed an alliance with new money technocracy and Jews for the purpose of fathering ‘mud man’. It is an alliance of convenience, but at present shows no signs of potential fracture.
The elephant you fail to perceive, though you’ve touched its trunk, feet, ears and tail, is psychopathy. Psychopathy is physiological, thus genetic, thus inheritable. Jews do in fact make up the biggest percentage of the globalist elite, but all of them, Jew or non, are psychopathic, and it is psychopathic dynasties which have ruled humanity for millennia.
However, it is Jew supremacist ideology which is the driving force behind the globalist agenda. More equal animals and so forth. Being atheists, they worship their own bloodlines as “God,” and thus believe in their inherent right to rule over the entire Earth. I see people insisting that the Jews are simply pawns in this game. They are not. They are its mainspring, driven by psychopathic self-aggrandizement and insatiable, damnable powerlust.
European people (are sheep) are being hunted like a prey by wolves (Jews) and people who acknowledge they authority.
I wrote about the psychology of miscegnation in my essay, “Mixed Race Infants Are Unhealthy Because Of Complex Gene-Environment Interaction”. Basically, in the United States, White women are the least likely overall to race mix despite approving of it at slightly lower rate than White men in the United States. So there is a clear and obvious limit to what propaganda can do to us.
https://preservingeurope.wordpress.com/2018/03/15/mixed-race-infants-are-unhealthy-because-of-genetics-and-epigenetics/
Hybrid vigor? LOL. I’ve done a bit plant hybridizing and the main thing is: you don’t know what you are going to get. The new vegetable or flower might be vigorous indeed, and beautiful, too. So you save the seed from the new plant and grow it out and it might be a big disappointment. So you have to do this over and over and over and over until the new product is stable and reliable. We can’t exactly do that with people. And that is the other side of the coin: a few good results just by fluky good luck, but mostly not.
Modern advertising is no longer about appealing to existing consumers, but about shaping demographic categories. It is about creating entirely novel categories of consumer identities. The most blatant example is the high school cliques, which are more often created by advertisers intentionally crafting a consumer identity than arising organically. Advertising companies will create a certain “identity” and accompanying “lifestyle” that fits, such as “skater” or “jock,” all with corresponding patterns of consumption and brand loyalties (music choices, clothing, even food items). This is not confined to high school either, but with adults it is necessarily more subtle. Apple is a good example for adults, attempting to craft a “creative artistic urban hipster” consumer identity.
So the interracial advertising is certainly meant to push that as a consumer identity category. It is probably part of a larger strategy of creating a rootless mass, which is good for consumption. Advertisers want people identifying with brands, not with ancestry or religion or similar traditional identity groups. You’re no longer defined by these categories, but by whether you choose Alexa or Siri home spying device or prefer Pepsi over Coke.
I liked the article, also many comments. Find it dull to see a reference to Mt. Fuji, ynu in the USA have many mountains, can’t you choose one of your own as particularly sacred? Fuji is a joke in a way, it lonks nice from a distance, but the lower slopes have a golf course, amusement park, among other things, parking spaces for cars and buses further up, the best part is the suicide forest, on the south-eastern side. At least that is almost pristine,.
It was disqualified from World Heritage (meaningless designation, but very popular in Japan for purposes of internal tourism) because of litter and human excreta.
I gather that a temporary cleanup before the last visit from the UNESCO morons gained it the status so coveted for internal tourism.
In Tokyo. nig (as Zelda Fitzgerald would say) music is relentlessly pushed, since the mid-ninnties, autotuned crap now, slowly, some women are making new little picaninnies.
The black fathers are absent immediately after impregnation or birth.
Much like the mating strategy of the cuckoo bird.
Most of those piccaninnies in Japan are the result of black military servicemen stationed there. Most likely to local Okinawan women as opposed to Japanese women. This is another poisonous effect that American hegemony has around the world. It has bases stationed all over the world, blacks of whom left to their own devices would never be able to travel to these places, end up stationed in these exotic places and hook up with a local women. The American military REALLY needs to be rolled back severely because of the dysgenic contamination it is reeking across 1st world countries.
Yes, and blacks behavior foments resentment against white Americans simply by the virtue of blacks being American.
Aiser: I read somewhere that after WW2 Iceland agreed to a U.S. military presence on the condition that no negroes were ever to be stationed on the island. Good job, Icelanders. I have also read that Iceland has the tallest mean population, one of (if not the) highest literacy rates in the world as well as the most Pulitzers (for what that is worth, these days) awarded to a nation’s denizens. Good job, Icelanders.
Not true of Tokyo and nearby places. On the rare occasions that a father is present, it is usually African. They do, however, often claim to be American at first, this is an assessment from when there were still print mags that ran on ads, and from observation.
In the top photo the white girl looks like she’s pulling away from him. Chateau Heartiste would say the relationship is doomed for failure. It wouldn’t be irregular since black man white woman relationships are twice as likely to end in divorce.
Or much worse. And the O.J. Simpson case is but a small portion of such tragedies.
Do you suppose they make these mixed race couples to try to appeal to two races at once or to appeal to rootless mixed race couples? A lot of black men want white women, so do you think they’re trying to tempt the average black guy into thinking subconsciously that the product will get him a white girl?
I wonder if these companies have any data which suggests that interracial ads are more effective. If the data suggests they are, then we can chalk this up to cold, Machiavellian ways. If they are less effective, we can say for sure that the ads represent an ideological push. I think what is most sick is that these Jewish CEOs can feel like they have the moral high ground as they try to wear down racial existence. It shows how little they think of whites as a group.
These commercials have been some of the most useful entries for planting seeds in the minds of whites anxious about the coming demographic shift. Many of them are visibly uncomfortable with this and you can point it out in public spaces and areas like Walmart or Chili’s or whatever. A smile and an almost whimsical demeanor seems to work best with both acquaintances or strangers. Of course you try to get their ‘measure’ first so to speak.
A főleg algériaiakból álló 10 fős migráns bűnbanda kiskorú lányokat drogozott be és tartott fogva 24 órán át, miközben erőszakolták őket. https://www.hirado.hu/kulfold/cikk/2018/03/24/tiz-migrans-egy-napon-keresztul-eroszakolt-fiatalkoru-lanyokat-spanyolorszagban
You’ll love what I saw Sunday morning: an advertisement for some medication featured an urban white man early 40s picking up his black daughter about 10 from school and taking her out for ice cream
Dale Gribble:
I saw a frontpage of a magazine yesterday, showing two girl of the same age and, according to the story announcement, are “twins”. Perhaps that’s possible if the mother played it loose and fast, but the friend I stood in the check-out line insisted that “science had shown that such a thing was possible due to the re-emergence of genetic code buried for many generations.
I think that this “discovery” in such an opportune time for furthering the current human breeding agenda marks it as highly suspect, and, should the girls indeed be twins, they are non-identical with two fathers.
“Science” is (or has become?) very flexible in adapting to the needs for certain findings.
Excellent article loaded with referenced facts that will directly counter the Liberal Propaganda lies. I would recommend everyone to reference this article and facts within, to counter any arguments promoting the so called joys of interracial relationships. Youtube is loaded with videos of young giddy white women showing off their black boyfriends, while promoting interracial relationships to other white females.
This needs to be mentioned; from the original article: “There seems to be a disproportionate number of Jews and those with Jewish sympathies involved in advertising. From small start-up firms to multi-billion-dollar corporations, all of which are promoting hostile anti-white canards, while praising “diversity” and “inclusion.” I’m sure it’s just another coincidence.”
There are Liberal Jews (who promote this propaganda) and there are conservative Jews (who don’t), just as their are Liberal Christians (see churches that promote the importation of black Africans into white towns and neighborhoods) and conservative Christians (who don’t). However it is a well known “secret” that Liberal Jews are overwhelmingly represented in the Mass Media and advertising Agencies. From Hollywood to paper advertisements.
My question is why do the Liberal Jewish run advertising agencies and mass media almost always use blond Germanic looking white women with black men in commercials and in the mass media, and never dark haired Jewish princesses with black males….A little revenge against Aryans and Christians who they personally blame for the Holocaust perhaps, while protecting the “purity” of their own daughters?
Another important factor for this BM/WF Interracial Propaganda to succeed is the absolute necessity to destroy the image of the White Male in the eyes of white women. As mentioned in the article they do this by portraying white males in every negative characteristic they can think of, while glorifying black males. “Very rarely anymore are white men portrayed in a favorable light, they are often the overweight, goofy, clumsy, half-wit that relies on women and non-whites to save the day. From films to television to advertisements, this is an increasingly common anti-white canard.”
They also use the power of visual imagery in the mass media to increase the guilt factor in whites and rage in blacks.
The portrayal of slavery in America is ALWAYS shown in over the top extremely exaggerated negative examples of “evil sadistic white slave masters” committing one abusive outrage after another upon their overly “suffering black victims.” One purpose of this is to increase disgust, anger, and outrage against white men, while promoting white guilt and sympathy for black males in the eyes of young impressionable white females.
A classic example is the Fox Network series ‘Legends and Lies: The Civil War’. Last night in an episode about John Brown they didn’t miss a beat. From portraying, in all its bloody gory detail, a white male beating a black man to death with a shovel. To an innocent young black boy being tortured by hanging him by his wrists.
Remember NOTHING in the mass media is done by accident. Every detail is planned and intentional.
So why is it NOT racist for the Liberal Mass Media to purposely manipulate race, exploit race, and use race to push a certain racial narrative in commercials for the purpose of social engineering the races…..But it IS racist to notice, or disapprove of such manipulation?
The insanity of Liberalism: “Whites are Oppressors. Non Whites are Victims. But Race doesn’t exist. Yet I love Racial Diversity. And I celebrate our Differences. Because we’re all the Same. So let’s destroy Diversity. By mixing Together…But ONLY in White Christian Countries.”
I like the idea of suing the store for only promoting white woman black male out-of-race pairing while discriminating against Asian male/black woman, etc. pairing.
The store owner obviously has a fetish. His fetish is discriminatory.
We should demand more images of Jewish women with black men. Mulatto-Jews will be less intelligent.
Franklin: A US President should publicly extol the flooding of Israel with african refugees/migrants. Claim that diversity is strength, that diverse cultures are healthy/wholesome for Israelis and that miscegenation of african and israeli jew is one of the most beautiful things the world could ever witness.
Then watch the Jericho missiles get rolled out and initiated. You might even hear the proverbial steam whistling out of their collective ears!! ((( The Tribe ))) are some of the most shameless hypocrites on the planet.
Excellent account of White genocide, but the evidence that there’s a malicious (((agenda))) behind it is purely Cohencidental.
I think part of the propaganda fed to white women over the past few decades is you must date a “tall” man, no matter what. Many strong, smart, athletic white men are not wanted by white women because they are 5’7 or below. These brainwashed white women want to be liked by “society” so they say I’ll only date 5’11” and above, for example. They don’t care if that 5’11” is a black man with huge lips who didn’t graduate college. Its mind boggling. And these women love shorter cute white men when they’re younger. It’s just as they get older that the 5’11” cutoff kicks in.
I hate your way of thinking..you can keep your white women and student loans ..I’ll keep my big lips ,whatever that has to do with it..Im personally glad I dont have lips so small you cant see them lol. I’m happy with a small business or electrician apprenticeship
White woman/black man being the least common combination of interracial marriage may be explained by the statistic revealed later in the piece that 97% of children born to white woman/black man relationship are out of wedlock.
In London in the UK, where I live, white woman/black man relationships appear to be very common. In fact sometimes I feel surprised to see an attractive white girl with a white guy in my neighborhood.
Comment by Adrian:
“In London in the UK, where I live, white woman/black man relationships appear to be very common. In fact sometimes I feel surprised to see an attractive white girl with a white guy in my neighborhood.”
Well, Adrian, it seems that beautiful white girls are soon going to be extinct in England. What I find hard to understand is why so many beautiful white women who no doubt love their own European features (such as their light eyes, long smooth hair and narrow noses) would choose to produce an African child that looks nothing like them.
In real life it has been frequently observed that the negro female suffers greater incidences at the hands of the negro male of:
1) poor economic productivity 2) financial failure (even when getting lucky with sports income, lottery wins or raysis law suits, the money is soon exhausted, usually profligately) 3) domestic violence 4) STDs 5) illegal drug use, including the trafficking of such 6) some kind of law enforcement or criminal justice system involvement, many times due to the aforementioned 7) lack of involvement of negro father with progeny and 8) abandonment of progeny after no longer involved with mother of brats
White females suffer equally, or as this article states, more in some cases. It doesn’t matter how high the social value of the negro male or of the White female. Look at O.J. Simpson and that White female who married him and had two kids with him. Except for financial and economic parts, she suffered just about everything a female suffers at the hands of a negro male.
Simpson was considered good looking by many/most. He played a sport thought to be the pinnacle of sports fandom. He made very good money at it and then later in the entertainment industry; another high status career. Many Whites who knew him well considered him part of the White world. But look at what she got from him. Tons of domestic abuse; she was even raped on her first date with him and she went back for more and got murdered. She was terrified of getting AIDS from him due to his screwing everything in a skirt. She was involved in cocaine with him and he was said by that Kato Kaelin to have gone to a McDonalds parking lot to try out some meth sometime between divorce and her murder. She complained that he spent little time (when at home) with the kids.
Didn’t seem to matter what negro male she cavorted with.
Bill Cosby was another negro who self destructed despite being as highly regarded by Whites as can be. No matter how well Whites think and treat a negro, no matter how much better the negro’s life is by being part of the White world, no matter how well the negro can, and does, fit into the White society/culture, self destruction seems to be ingrained. Genetic, to be precise.
True…but I loved how you spelled racist as ‘raysis’!!!????
Applehead: Thank you. I do use the pidgin “raysis” to imitate the ebonic form of “racist”. But I didn’t see it in my post you responded to. Either I didn’t use it or my post was edited. Hmm????
What I wonder is whether there are groups that incentivize this through ad subsidies and such IF your ad features a black man and white woman. THAT to me would constitute social programming.
National Association Advancing Uncolored People (www.NAAUP.org) on K Street in Washington DC, around the corner from the NAACP who inspire us to advance our race too, links to your excellent work.
100% agree
The same thing is happening all over UE and sadly it’s working.
Yep it sure is an international push and I dont know if its for an infuse of Melanin to combat the effects of an increasingly heating Sun or if they are trying to reduce black on black births.It sure is puzzling.
I have noticed the same thing and I’d just like to point out that, White Men aren’t the only ones being effected by this and in my opinion it seems to be more of an attack on the black units than the white. I keep seeing white women with black Men or vice versa but I have also seen a show where a black family adopted two white children, another where a black woman married a white man instead of the children’s black father or even another black Man. Believe it or not this social engineering push could hurt a black minority far more than a white majority. Even in a show where there are multiple black male characters they will male the black woman hook up with a white person. You are most definitely not the Target, if anything it seems more like a half wit plan to reduce black numbers, even though that surely won’t work. Black genes are dominant over White. Black Man White Woman, Black Baby, Black Woman White Man, Black Baby.
I am African American and I’ve been bothered by this obvious agenda to “white out” the black gene for few years now. It’s gotten much worse over the past year. Although I agree with some of the points addressed in this article, most of it is a stretch to say the least. The white community has always esteemed the white woman as an innocent bystander. I have witnessed (on several occasions) white women aggressively go after black men. Not every interracial couple you see (BM/WW) was pursued by the man. The reason I know this agenda is designed to target the black race is because although you see the interracial couples shoved down our throats, we still continue to see plenty of white couples married on TV, but do me a favor…count the black couples that you see…they are rare! TV either Portrays the black character as either in a same-sex relationship or interracial. Gone are Heathcliff and Clair Huxtable relationships (The Cosby Show). Make no mistake about it my friend…this is black genocide!!!
Nada! There is a big agenda. The global elite that run this country do everything they can to bring about order out of chaos. This interracial nonsense is just about that. No way are the mega corporations going to promote such a tiny customer base knowing well the majority of this country will not buy it! God created all the races. If he wanted a malotto race he would have created them! I see nothing morally wrong with mixed marriages. What I do find morally wrong is to promote it for a particular agenda! RACE AGAINST RACE to control both races. Hegelian Dialectic
I’m a white man from an inner city on the east coast of the U.S., here is what I observed coming of age as a poor white male minority living in black ghettos for the first 17 years of my life.
In inner city’s across America white women choose black men as a survival strategy. Black boys physically mature faster than white boys and in general black boys are able to completely dominate white boys physically before they become teenagers. Blacks also tend to live and cooperate in large groups or gangs giving them an advantage in overpowering white males all throughout their childhood. The few white males that do fight back are met with an overwhelming black response as well as condemnation and alienation from “progressive” whites if they do resist black violence.
White girls that grow up in these conditions see white boys and men as unable to offer them basic physical protection while being reinforced with types propaganda presented in the article. Jews may control the overall narrative in mass media however, white girls and women control the narrative at the community level. They reinforce the mixed race relationship lifestyle with black males to their rural white female counterparts in an effort to create a community of peers.
In short, as a white male that suffered black violence all throughout my childhood I deeply resent rich rural whites, they talk a good game on the internet but when it comes to assisting their inner city brethren, they are cowards. They leave the poor inner city white men to fight outnumbered and outgunned while sacrificing the cities that our ancestors built. Then to make matters worse, rural whites alienate poor inner city whites when they try to escape inner city black violence.
If you want to nip this multi-racial culture in the bud then put your money where your mouth is. To “pull each other up that mountain”, venture into any American inner city and offer poor white children surrounded by black violence a pathway to safety and an alternative to the survival strategies they are forced to develop.
Paul Cancel: I am a White male who grew up in small town and then rural East Coast. I was around very few negroes and those that I was were found in the public schools. I thank my good luck for that. After high school, I went into the Army (1980s) and found negroes from every corner of America and they were mostly the same; violent, lazy in some way, irresponsible etc. Even the negroes treated by White officers (at that time political correctness was rampant) as “The Shit” were always a buffoon in some way. Nothing but token promoted negroes.
I also at the same time met Whites from every corner of America. The ones from urban cities were the ones who would take the side of a negro against their fellow Whites during some conflict, verbal or physical. The Whites from the North East were always preaching the jew propaganda from jew Hollywood and news media that all White southern men were the “slowest” minds. Mostly, the NE Whites invented and used slang expressions and passed that off as some indicator of intelligence. I never once saw any repeated/consistent superiority in ASVAB test scores, grades in technical MOSs, no better spoken or written speech, no better grammar, diction or English usage. Their sense of superior intelligence is just more jew propaganda.
If any Whites need your advice to help poorer Whites in urban areas, it would be those who live in those White cities. The few left, that is.
I do agree with all you wrote about how negroes and their gang-like activity. I saw it in Army basic training. A fight between me and some trash talking negro evolved into all the other negroes jumping into it, while most Whites sat out the fight and just stood there. I was dragged to the ground and only got one shot landed on that negro and it just about broke my hand. He punched like a literal girl. Many of the other negroes selected a White they did not like, who they had previously exchanged hostile words with, and attacked them. I learned a lot that day about the general negro. And that brawl was a small glimpse to what will happen societal wide when the coming race war begins; many Whites will sit it out and leave those Whites willing to fight to their own fate as all non-Whites plus LEFTIST Whites gang up on those race proud Whites. Just like happened in your small microcosm.
I do not care if you are pink, green or black but this Untrue social engineering has been exponentially annoying me for months now.
It is time for the normal population fought back.
I suggest we enable a worldwide boycott of any company using this type of advertising, just stop buying their products?
This is beyond my expertise to initiate so any experts out there to start a social media campaign?
The fact that black men see winning the affections of a white woman as a badge of honor, betrays the fact that they still see us as superior to them, subconsciously more than likely. That is NOT the way it is when white MEN get with black women. Whether they will admit it or not, they know their TRUE place in society. They’re living vicariously through the achievments of the white race and no amount of hookups with white women will ever change that reality.
This is a great article.
Has anyone compiled similar data on the white male asian female propaganda? I feel like that is strongly pushed as well.
I’ve seen quite a few european alpha males date asian women. They were probably after the femininity.
THANK YOU for this article !! I just now came across it when I googled “show me some advertising with White people in it” because I am so damn SICK AND TIRED of seeing nothing but Black people in every ad, on every website, in every print ad, on every package —- Everywhere. That, or race-mixing as so brilliantly illustrated above.
Many, many attempts have I made to contact either the webmaster of a company’s website, the “customer feedback” window, or even the customer service e-mail to ask these cowardly, Anti-White, craven bastards to ask them, “Why are you afraid to show WHITE people in your advertising??”
It’s amazing. It’s been over 2 years later since this article was written and the interracial agenda has gotten even worse. Black people are literally in 85% of commercials and are thrown in almost every movie now to meet a quota. White men are always portrayed as the idiots and there’s plenty of interracial commercials. Movies today are insufferable to the point of me now waiting for an agenda to be shoved in my face versus actually enjoying a movie that has good content without a message. White people need to wake up but I fear it’s too late. The town I group up in is now being taken over almost completely by Indians and the US is selling out hard. With that said it does make me feel good reading this stuff because it makes me feel like I’m not alone in feeling this way.
Excellent article, destined to be a classic for years to come. I have one quibble, though: “… while at the same time abhorring the *logical* outcomes of those relationships”.
This *logical* is off. We know of the outcome of mixed-race relationships after the fact (because we have troves of data), not a priori. Thus, I would suggest writing *empirical* outcomes (or ‘real life’ outcomes, or something like that), but not *logical* outcomes.
I wish it was the time I grew-up in the early 60’s with the Andy Griffith show, Mayberry and Leave it to Beaver Era! I miss those times very much!! You can have your smart phones and computers! Rose
Recently retired ad exec here. Biggest reason is that if you *don’t* have at least one black person in your ad, the left will unleash complaints, threats, boycots, and as we’ve seen lately, worse. The easiest way to do this is to mix the couple. Otherwise you have to introduce another couple and you can’t always do that due to time or space.
If you *do* have a mixed couple, the right doesn’t like it but won’t do anything about it. So guess which side wins?
That said, there are some creative directors who insist on mixed couples to “send a message” but those are fairly rare. It’s mostly a CYA move to protect yourself from the angry mob.
Good thing you retired, because I’m not buying what you’re selling. It is virtually always black man – white woman. Did you even read the article above? It is not just some lazy decision. It’s tactical and it’s devilish. Now go blow smoke up someone else’s ass.
If you support ‘Only Black Lives Matter’ even tacitly, you are contributing to the racial tension you claim to oppose. Nothing can be gained until these divisive terms are targeted for what they really are, hate. They all must go or the arson, looting and killing over George Floyd is just the beginning.
If it please the editors; I’ve split my comment into five parts. I believe that it’s very timely, and difficult to give in precis form. The subject has filled many books; I hope it will be of interest.
Part One of Five: It’s time to dissipate a Jewish smoke screen. Although the term “Judeo-Christian” has entrenched itself in the West; it is an oxymoron. It’s similar to coining the absurd term “Christians against Christ.” A more historically correct term would be “Hebraic-Christian.” Why? The Jews practice Judaism. They mostly reject Moses’ Hebraic teachings. Judaism is a man centered; mostly anti-God; anti-Christ collection of rubbish. God “listens to their counsel”? What colossal arrogance. The Talmud approves of sex with pre-pubescent girls, and lying to the “gentiles.” Let’s call the Jews–in the main–Talmudists. The *Talmud*; a sixty-six volume of “rabbinical/sage” writings. Jesus scathingly called the religious leaders of his day “A brood of vipers.” My thesis: The Jews call themselves “Semitic.” It’s an abused term, and used as a weapon against “gentiles.” It’s pure propaganda; akin to “never forget.” By the way–an individual cannot be a “gentile.” It’s a generic term; having several meanings. It primarily means nations. In places; the Bible also refers to the Jews as “gentiles.” There are many highly credentialed Jewish historians/professional researchers who are not afraid to go against the grain. Their research findings: Most of today’s Jews have not a drop of Hebrew blood. As high as ninety-percent.
What I am about to write will surprise–or shock–many people. However; my points can be proved biblically, and by multi-disciplinary fields of good quality; academically respectable evidence. It begins with this overlooked fact: The Old Testament patriarch Jacob had twelve sons; through four wives. One son he named Judah. Note well. Only one son named Judah. It’s importance will soon become apparent. Search the entire Bible–ONLY descendants of Judah were called Jews; or Judahites. There is nothing magical; or “sacred” about the name; or the people. It only describes tribal affiliation. Example: The tribe of Dan: Danites. Asher: Asherites. Reuben: Reubenites. Simeon: Simeonites, and so on. After King Solomon’s death; God split the twelve tribes into two kingdoms; the ten-tribed Northern Kingdom of Israel, and the two-tribes of the Kingdom of Judah. The two kingdoms were quite separate: They had different histories/politics, and prophecies. In several places in the Old Testament; “The Jews were at war with Israel.” They were separate; but related; people groups. Here is the critical point to know: The Jews–and Israel–were NOT interchangeable terms. Contrary to popular; but ignorant Bible teachers; The Jews/Judahites were not–ARE NOT–Israel. NOWHERE in the Bible is this taught. The huge mistake anyone reading the Bible can make is this: Mentally substituting the word “Jew” when they see the word “Israel.” The Jews. Are. Not. Israel. Period. That is the Bible’s testimony. End of Part One.
Part Two of Five. Additionally; apart from Judah’s offspring; the descendants of the twelve tribes were not “Jews.” ONLY descendants of the patriarch Judah; one of Jacob’s sons. (Became known as Jews.) Only the descendants of the ten tribes were collectively known as (biblical) Israel. Despite naming their country “Israel;” today’s tiny Israeli nation is more accurately named Judah; or Judea. The Jews have appropriated the name Israel–either intentionally; or through sheer ignorance. The Bible cannot be properly understood if one confuses the inappropriately named; 1948 “Israel;” with the descendants of the ten tribes of Israel. If the 1948 Zionists had properly named their country, and people; JUDAH–There would be far less confusion. It would also end Christians obsequiousness toward Jews.
This information is not new; or the modern domain of Christian-like “cults.” It has a fine pedigree; going back many; many hundreds of years. It has been studied/appreciated/expounded by kings-/queens/high ranking politicians/military men/professors/Educators/the “common man”/men of science/Well known historians. It has often been ridiculed/attacked/denounced by people who are ignorant of what the Bible, and history; teaches. Its detractors use ad-hominem attacks, and straw man arguments against it. They refuse; however; to honestly engage the subject matter. Why?? A little thought will give us some answers. The Jews don’t want anyone knowing these facts. It would expose their lies, and weaken their political/theological position. Secondly; People who hate the Bible–and there are many; of all stripes–Do not want/would not want this coming to light. Anything that affirms the veracity of scripture must be vehemently attacked/ridiculed.
The Jews call themselves the “Chosen People.” Chosen to do what; exactly? I’ll soon answer that important question. They call themselves “Semitic.” Newsflash: Jacob had twelve sons, not one. (The word Semitic is derived from Abraham’s ancestor Shem.) Judah was Semitic. Therefore; Jacob’s other ten sons–Judah’s brothers–are; by birth; also Semitic. As I have said; it’s easily proven–Just by carefully studying the Old Testament. Remember! Jewishness only denotes tribal affiliation; by one’s birth. The descendants of the ten brothers were Semitic–But not Jews. Example: Descendants of Dan’s tribe–Judah’s brother–were not Jews; they were Danites. to repeat: ONLY Judah’s descendants are the Jews. (Are the British Scots? The Irish English? Canadians Americans?) The terms are not synonymous. (Jew is not = Israel.) The four groups of distinct people are derived from common ancestors; but different. Churchmen have no excuse not to see this glaringly obvious fact. Why are they so blind?? Because! They prostrate themselves before the “holy” Jews. It beggars belief. The Jews are known to be virulently anti-Christ; but Christian’s blindly prostrate themselves at the feet of God’s “Chosen ones.” The Jews weave a modicum of truth with many falsehoods.
Part Three of Five. Three years ago; I set out to learn about my Scottish ancestry. I reasoned that they didn’t suddenly spring up like carrots. Who were their ancestors? I rejected the poetic nonsense that they “appeared out of the mists of time.” Give me factual history; not Aesop’s Fables. Who are the European’s “mists of time” ancestors? The respected first century Jewish historian Josephus wrote that “…wherefore there are but two [Jewish] tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the ten tribes [israel] are beyond Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers.” *The Antiquities of the Jews. 11.133.* During the Parthian Empires’ waning days; the ten tribes began a mass migration through the Caucasus Mountains. (Parthia had a border with the Caucasus Mountains.)
Historians note that “these [Parthian] people” “suddenly disappeared.” Mysteriously; by sheer coincidence; a group of the same magnitude began appearing on the northern side of the mountian range–into today’s Europe. The Parthian empire was founded by the descendants of the–you guessed it–ten tribes. They were known to be polite; well educated; well dressed, and skilled in battle. They defeated the mighty Roman Army…Twice. The men wore trousers, and used horses and wagons. They were well known for fairness, and kindness. Whites are today known as “Caucasians.” That’s a pretty big clue as to our ancestor’s identity. Hint: They came through the Caucasus Mountain Range. The pass today is still known as the “Pass of Israel.”
Some background. The non-Jewish; but Hebrew; ten tribes–were exiled by God. They angered him to the point that the said they were “Not my people.” They were henceforth “Without mercy.” They were “strangers to the Covenant; without God in the world.” He exiled them after pleading with them for several centuries. They refused to obey him, and went “a-whoring” after false gods. He led them throughout the centuries; to a land that “their fathers never knew.” Where? The Bible uses Jerusalem as the starting reference. They were led “north and west” (Northwest.) Where did they finally come to rest? What were these new land(s) called? The Bible describes them thusly: The “Isles of the West.” Exiled Israel’s descendants were to multiply “like fish.” Draw a line northwest of Jerusalem. Stop when your line reaches the “Islands of the West.” It is th eend point; before the Atlantic Ocean. Where do you find yourself?
Part Four of Five. Final point(s). Most of Jacob’s descendants were not/are not; Jews. ALL of his descendants are therefore Semitic. Contrary to egregiously bad Christian teaching; God did not permanently reject the ten tribes. He promised to restore them; bless them richly, and greatly multiply them. Their multiple material–and spiritual blessings–would reach fruition in what the Bible calls the “end-of-days;” or the “latter days.” They would NOT be called by their former name–Israel. Rather; they would be known by a “New name; that God would name them.” They would be multiplied greatly; as the “sand of the sea.” They would enjoy (undeserved) blessings: Choice; temperate countries. Abundant agriculture. “Treasures of the deep.” Treasures beneath the hills” (Mineral wealth; etc.” They would be feared , and envied. They would have powerful militaries, and formidable naval power. They would “possess the gates of those [nations] that hate them. (World-wide; military chokepoints.) They would “No longer be bothered by their former (Mid-
East) enemies. They would live in nations surrounded by oceans. They would–according to the word meaning of “Hebrew”–Be colonizers. The descendants of the ten tribes (and the many Judahites that migrated with them) would form a latter-day “[Great] Nation, and commonwealth (or) company of nations.” A sizable group of one brother’s descendants would complain that the new land was “too confining.” They were (biblically) destined to break away from the Mother Country, and also become a “Great people.” Sound like a country you know?? (The trade routes between the British Isles and the Mid-Eastern Holy Land were well known, and well traveled in the centuries–millennia- preceding Christ.) Most of the tin was mined in Britain, a very important metal in those days. The Hebrew people were not–as commonly pictured–sheep herders. They were cultured; mannered; well educated people. Their military prowess was well known, and they ruled the sea.
Spiritually; the multitudinous; multi-national descendants of the ten tribes were to be known as “God’s Servants.” That brings me back to the much maligned term “Chosen People.” Only one group of blood related nations on earth have been God’s servants. Only the Christian West has obeyed Christ’s great commission to “go into all the world, and preach the Good News to every creature.” Apart from the Western “Great nation, and commonwealth of nations;” the rest of the world would have remained in spiritual darkness. God commanded the Israelites/Hebrew families to marry ONLY within the twelve tribes. NO RACE MIXING. Again; politically incorrect. Tough. God want(ed) to keep his two families untainted by foreign blood. (Two families; Judah, and Israel.) This had biblical ramifications; nothing “racist” about it. One reason: Pure worship; not intermingled with paganism.
Part Five of Five. Although the residue of Judah can still be called–loosely–God’s “Chosen Ones”–They cannot lay sole claim to that appellation. It especially belongs to us–the provable descendants of the exiled ten tribes; who were to be found; not in “Israel”–but in the Islands of the West, and from there; colonize a large number of non-Hebrew nations. They (we; their non-Jewish “gentilized” Hebraic descendants) would form a “great nation, and company of nations.” A formidable group. An inference can be drawn from the attacks on the West…Multicult/”White privilege” White this, and White that. Only the Western; blood related group of nations are under this internal; multicult based attack. No other countries on earth. These wonderful countries are our (literally) God given birthright. God has given us the highest ranking, and world dominance. Not because we’re better. We were to be a “blessing to the other nations.” Many honest scholars; Dr. Ricardo Duchesne comes foremost to mind; have enumerated the long; long list of exclusively Western achievements. Arts/Education/Law/Medicine/Science/Music/The creation of almost ALL of the musical instruments ever produced/The Magna Carta/Ethics/The internal combustion engine/The Diesel engine/The Scientific Method/Genetics/The DNA Code/….The list goes on, and on. As God said; We would be a blessing to the undeveloped world; in so many ways. One other role God had for us: We were to be his “Battle Ax.” What does that suggest? I think we can argue; successfully–That the USA has been the protector of many nations around the world, and fought against the enemies of weaker nations/peoples.
We too are literally a part of God’s Chosen Ones. Chosen to be a light to the world, and to be God’s Servant people. His ambassadors–Presenting a knowledge of him to the world. We have been only too human. Succeeding, and failing. He chose our ancient forefathers “Not because you were the strongest; but because you were the weakest of the nations.” They failed him; time, and time again. Like our ancient; Baal worshipping forefathers; WE have become a debauched, and evil generation. We have turned our backs on the God of our fathers. God is forgiving; but he is also just. We have enjoyed rich blessings above all the other nations. That is inarguable. We have chosen to reject him, and act profanely. He must therefore bring judgement, and sift us like wheat. Are we for him; or against him? As recorded in 2 Chronicles 7:14–“If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.” That’s a promise. “My people; called by my name.” Our pre-exile ancestors used to be called Israel. Now he has given us our new name: Christians. We have been mostly faithful to our task. As God said; the Jews would be a “byword; a hissing.” They would remain “few in number.” End.
If my “five part” commentary is not published; there is a post-script: Despite their oppressive propaganda; the Jews are not a “race.” Judaism is a religion. Jews come in all types; including proselytes. Jews identify as White when it benefits them, and denigrate us when it suits their purpose. Jews are racially White. Period. If one desires historical proof; Let the Bible speak: (1) “Israel’s Nazarites [Hebrews] are described as being “purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies.” (Lam. 4:7 KJV.) This word “ruddy” is from the Hebrew word “awdome” and means “rosy.” (Rosy cheeks; Showing blood in the face.) That excludes darker skinned people. (2) Many theologians are convinced that the “Husband” in the Song of Solomon has a dual fulfillment in both Solomon, and, prophetically, in Jesus the Messiah: “My beloved [husband] is white and ruddy….(Song of Solomon 5:10 KJV.) King David, and his son Solomon–were Jesus’ ancestors. They were born into the tribe of Judah; from which today’s (genetic) Jews are descended. Despite any baseless arguments; genetic Jews are White. Anyone who denies this needs their eyes/senses checked. I challenge anyone to walk along the main-streets of any Western country–and say “Look! There’s a Jew!” Physically; they are identical to “us.” (With the minor exception of the Ultra-Orthodox; Hasidic Jews who wear traditional garb): Black coats; beards; curls dangling from their black; brimmed hats; etc. Apparently; this is a clothing custom that originated in Poland. So! The next time someone tries to dupe you into accepting the ridiculous assertion that the Jews are a “race” (not White) knock down their baloney w/ a few scripture verses. And; ask them about a Jews skin color. Imagine the Roman Catholics claiming to be a special “race.” (Other than White.) They wouldn’t be taken seriously.
Look at the likes of Bernie Madoff, Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein…..the Kushner family that Ivanka Trump is married into, the Jewish family that that homely Clinton child married into….all of them in prison for horrible crimes! Do you think that is just a coincidence? Of course not, they are trying to “mongrelize” the white race by encouraging this inter breeding that produces such unfortunate looking offspring. It disgusts me to see this blatant propaganda pushing the black man with usually always a fair skinned, blue eyed blonde woman! Ugh. Wherever you find Evil, you will find a JEW! This is a great and informative article.
I, too, as a black person am sick of being bombarded by these images of black people (especially men) being paired with white, Asian and even Latino partners. Despite being constantly told and shown by these very groups that everyone hates black people, and we are the least desired, that does not reflect in the images shown in almost every ad, commercial, film and television show- where you see non black people throwing themselves at black people or at least overtly sending the message that they desire interracial children or friendships. After reading your article, I got the impression that you believe white women/people are the victims. My questions concerning this inverted message is:
Q1. If black people are an oppressed group with no resources, and it costs millions of dollars to produce ads, print, commercials, TV shows and movies (which we all agree features way too many instances of interracial couples)- then who is the group or entity responsible for mass replication of this message? Who is funding or fitting the bill for the millions it takes to produce this media?
A1. Fiscally, black people are not capable of this. Black men are especially not behind this, because financially they are the poorest and most under-deserved group. It is fiscally impossible for black people to fund this propaganda at this scale because Black people do not capital to pay the type of advertising dollars required. On the other hand, white people are capable. Not only are they capable but they are infact the ones producing these ads and paying to advertise them. So how are white people the victims when they are funding and pushing it down everyone’s throat?
Q2. Finances aside, who is making the decision to cast these black people in these interracial roles?
A2. It is well documented that black people are under-represented in corporate America and the workplace in general, especially when it comes to executive, leadership and management positions. Top executives and decision-makers are the people who decide marketing, branding, advertisement, etc. Provided this, it would make sense to say that white people in high positions are making the decisions to flood us with interracial promotions. Also, many of these brands are not black-owned brands. These are traditionally white owned media companies, but 90% of their ads feature the black man. How are white people the victim when they are the only ones in a position to make these decisions?
Q3. If black men/people are so hated and despised (slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, etc), then why spend the money and effort to immerse your products and branding around them in such an over the top way? How are white people the victim still?
A3. I dont understand this myself. It either has to be some type of shameful deep-seated hypocrisy or some type of diversity initiative. If we go with the diversity excuse (we bombard our media with interracial couples to show we value diversity), then why isnt that promoted outside of advertisement? I mean, if you truly wanted to diversity then why not diversify the organization? For example, often times I see these interracial images everywhere. I see them on websites, tv, billboards, shows, movies-everwhere. Each time I see it I often look up the staff or senior leadership. Depsite the billions of black images in the ads, I often see all white staff members running these companies. So, diversity is important in the ads but not in the workplace? You want to pair black people with white people romantically but not employ black people? You want them to market the products but not provide them a share in the profits?
Q4. If the reality (according to you) is that white women often reject black men in “real life” then how do you explain the overwhelming number of white women partnered with black men all over the place?
A4, You cited a statistic about interracial marriage being low but does that number represent reality? If white women are rejecting black men in such large numbers then why every where I turn, all I see is white females with black men? Need proof, then who do you explain the ridiculously large amount of white female celebrities with black men? Not only that, but I see an unreal amount of white women dating black college athletes. I see even more white women dating or married to black male professional athletes. All over youtube, all you see is white women with black men channels. In the large cities I have visited (I swear) all I see is white women with black men, everywhere. Seems like even lower profile black men (attorney generals, surgeon general, etc) are with black men. Even porn is saturated with interracial stuff. It is almost as if they dont even cast white women with white men. It is so bad, me and my friends have discussed it. I dont know what “reality” you live in but I see too many white women rejecting black men.
Q. If “the woman chooses,” then how do you explain the black man imbalance?
A1. I was always told that the woman chooses the man. I was also told that white women are the standard of beauty. Statically, we know that white women are among the wealthiest and most affluent in the world. This tells me that white women should be the most desired women in the world (because of their wealth and beauty) and thus they should also have priority over a mate, because they get the pick of the litter. Out of all the men in the world, why are so many white women (who can have whoever they want) choosing black men, many of who lower their status and cannot match their wealth? With all the affluent and good looking white men, why choose the black man who, historically, no one has ever liked or respected? It’s even worst with high profile white women. I mentioned previously white female actresses, celebrities, socialites, etc mostly dating black men. Like these women are super beautiful and rich but yet they are with black men.
Q. If black people are only 13% of the population, then why do blacks occupy 90% of the screen time?
A. In a majority white county-it does not make sense that global, domestic or even local brands would spend so many millions to include a disliked minority in all their advertisements. As a marketing major, I learned that every thing from the smallest to the largest details in ads were included for mass appeal and target marketing. Why would you want to advertise your products to the smallest purchasing demographic in the country? Why would I market to 13% of the population instead of 60%?
Conclusion: I could go on and on with questions, answers, and examples but I will not. I just felt the need to respond to your post because it bothered me that you actually said that white women/people are the victims. I was especially offended by the STD charts and etc you posted. It’s funny to me how Latinos and Asians are not classified as “white” on the CDC statistics but otherwise are classified under “white” on the Census statistics. And why not cite the raw numbers instead of percentages, which is just bad data. And despite the negative stereotypes of blacks having these STDs, that doesnt seem to stem the countless amount of white people I see hugged up with black men/people. At the rate everyone is throwing themselves at black men for sex, look like the whole country is going to have an STD. And my second point, I find it super immoral how everyone wants to subject black people to global racism and poverty but at the same time want to have interracial relationships, children and families with them. One minute you are watching an interracial love fest and then you change the channel and see an anti-black news incident- you turn on the award show and watch the interracial couples arrive on the red carpet together and then forced to listen to BLM speeches throughout the show. Personally, If I hated a group of people as much as people claim to hate black people, the last thing I would do is interracially date, and I darn sure would not spend billions of dollars and hours building my brand, products, livelihood, creative products, inventions, resources and/or profits on those very people. Seems like the only victims of this madness is black men. People “hate you” because 1) you are more desirable than them 2) you are cooler than them 3) you are more talented than them or 4)
French translation of the video here: https://www.egaliteetreconciliation.fr/Decouvrez-la-video-La-guerre-contre-les-Blancs-dans-la-publicite-62409.html
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.