Print this post Print this post

The End of the Nation-State:
The Privatization of Politics

1,297 words

The nation-state is the triangulation of people, territory, and sovereignty. If this triangulation is threatened, the idea of the State itself is threatened.

Of course, we know that the idea of a people is under attack in the West: the Left, the progressives, and the liberals (please don’t call them “cultural Marxists,” they are not “cultural” nor “Marxists”) are working to destroy the idea of “heartland,” common values, ethnic homogeneity, et cetera.

We can say the same about the concept of territory. The sanctity of national borders is routinely violated by internet superpowers, NGO boats making landfall, and corporations that choose where to produce, where to sell, where to abuse state subsidies, and where to pay — and not pay — taxes.

But the most important point is sovereignty, which stands for a state being able to make its own choices.

Supranational powers are trying to kill the idea of a nation-state by killing the sovereignty inherent to it; a typical example is how Facebook can modify the normal political process of a country. Take the Italian case, where the company deleted the page of the radical Right political party and movement CasaPound Italia (CPI) and the pages of all of its activists, going so far as to ban even the symbols and logos of CPI as “hate propaganda.” This was done despite the party being legally admitted to the national and local elections in the country. As a result, Facebook is actively interfering in national and local elections in Italy, as CPI candidates can no longer rely on Facebook as a tool of political campaigning. [1]

Likewise, Twitter has decided to completely remove certain keywords from the totality of political discussion, branding them as “hate speech” — which is quite laughable. Google is actually in a position to accept or reject whole ideas or questions in society. But this danger is not limited to elections or small fringe parties and movements: this is happening every day.

For example, we know that Google or Facebook knows more about the Irish public through data mining than the Irish government knows or even can know. But if this information superiority is already a reality, as I underline today, this means that in the near future we’ll see the end of the most intrinsic quality of the state: the monopoly on violence.

You can buy The World in Flames: The Shorter Writings of Francis Parker Yockey here.

How is this happening? Currently in two ways, which will probably intensify.

First of all, private military companies (contractors) are technically able to challenge the military forces of many states. They are recruiting members with elite backgrounds (previously trained for years by the armed forces of one state or another) and they have the capacity to conduct “regime change operations.” Of course, at this moment in time, they do not operate in the same manner or areas as standing armies of first-world nations, but there is reason to believe it is simply a matter of time before they begin acting with more agency.

After all, as we saw in many second and third world nations where contractors organized riots, they used the reaction of the “rogue state” to create and weaponize a narrative (by exploiting media and marketing experts) and applied “direct military force” to “defend people” and overthrow an “illegitimate government.” This could happen tomorrow in France during the yellow vests protests, or in the US by maneuvering the Antifa/BLM/Never Trump movement.

The second field to keep under a watchful eye is what is called “the public order.” Taken for granted until yesterday, peace could very well be considered an asset you’ll have to pay for if you don’t want riots and chaos to take place in your neighborhood. If, for example, BLM’s calls to defund the police remain a powerful argument in the future (and we are sure that it will be), you’ll still need someone to patrol the road in the absence of a public police force. That’s where private police come in.

This seems to betray the motivations of corporations like Amazon or Netflix; why are they such good friends of the BLM movement? Because they are looking forward to the big business of security. Really, they can’t wait for it. Naturally, this means that in the future the laws of a given state will be less and less sovereign — and way less effective — than Amazon’s or Google’s laws.

The white identitarian movement has to think about this scenario: what are our choices? What do we have to defend? What do we have to prepare for?

There are several points of view and many examples of identitarian movements that have tried to confront this new post-political future on their own terms. If the erosion of the traditional political landscape is taken to be a given, then the most important question to reflect on is how we can divert this process in our favor.

Take Italy, for example. Movements like CasaPound are opting out of the electoral struggle and the use of their own symbols for external “marketing” purposes, urging their militants to pursue politics within mainstream right-leaning parties, particularly at the local level or in the youth association of parties like “Lega” or “Fratelli d’Italia.” It’s basically using an old Italian Leftist tactic known as la doppia tessera — “double enrollment” or “dual membership,” as in holding two membership cards. [2]

For a long time now, Greek activists in Golden Dawn have attempted to replace the official police in destitute neighborhoods with their own patrols. This is done both to gain popularity in these parts of towns — often traditional strongholds of the Left — and to defend the locals from the Islamization of the suburbs.

During the American BLM/Antifa riots, we witnessed the frequent absence of police when and where it mattered most. The message seems to be that if you are able to organize patriots for local patrols and defense of your neighborhood, you can minimize the chaos. If not, you may very well up end up seeing your business, your vehicle, or your own home burning.

The State can’t — or won’t — help you. We have to accept this — and choose to organize ourselves for the future instead.

If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every Friday.

Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.

Notes

[1] Facebook tried to interfere with both the official political process and the informational process — in other words, informing the public of your campaign. You will find some false information about the party as grounds for it being deplatformed, though it must be noted that Facebook lost the legal trial defending this decision because an Italian judge ruled that a private company has no legal grounds to decide if a registered political party is legitimate or not. In any case, despite the official page of CPI being back online as Facebook has been forced to reinstate it, Facebook upheld the bans and deletions of accounts belonging to individual militants who, of course, are in no position to contest these actions in court. Facebook also unsuccessfully tried to shut down the accounts of newspaper and publishing houses linked to the movement.

Di Ilaria Saccheroni, “Il giudice condanna Facebook: vietato oscurare CasaPound,” Corriere della Sera, May 27, 2020.

Casapound: Facebook censura pagina Primato Nazionale,” Adnkronos, October 31, 2019.

[2] You can find the full theory behind this strategy of using radical militants to influence the political output of mainstream Right-wing parties in my book: Guido Taietti, Trattato sul Sovranismo, ed. Fonte di Connla. Collana Chimera, 2019, pp. 117-172.

 

7 Comments

  1. Robert Clingan
    Posted September 30, 2020 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    This is a good article and very concise. You’ve given me a bit to think about, Guido.
    “After all, as we saw in many second and third world nations where contractors organized riots, they used the reaction of the “rogue state” to create and weaponize a narrative”
    I’m not quite clear what you mean by this. Some examples would be helpful, because I’m not aware of contractors doing this sort of thing.

    • Guido T.
      Posted October 1, 2020 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

      Dear Robert,
      You’re right, maybe I was a little bit too shortly.
      If I have to do one example in a second world country I can say the “white helmets” in Siria: helping the oppositions of Assad (so “helping Isis” ), trying to create the “use/of/chemical/weapon”fake news and spreading it on the occidental media…an humanitarian NGO with a chief and founder, James le Mesurier who was a former (former, sure 😉 ) MI6 agent… a tipical curriculum of a person with humanitarian issues how you imagine

      But probably we can do a similar analysis about movement like BLM: a web of NGO and strange money who have create this “antifa network” that is trying to alterate the political process in the US

      • Lord Shang
        Posted October 3, 2020 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

        A good post, pregnant with unsettling implications which need to be explored at greater length. I have written many extensive comments here at CC extolling the need for offline patriot (read: implicitly white, to morph someday into explicitly white) networking and organizing, both for political and self-defense purposes. Men who are organized for self-defense are obviously far more effective than a collection of even better armed but random individuals. The atomization of whites has been a key mechanism by which white majorities across Europa have been kept in check (from securing their racial interests).

        Indeed, a virtuous circle can be created. The key to white advance (and ultimately, preservation) is collective action, the key to which in turn is offline organizing. Organizing for self-defense also begins the networking and “social deepening” process that can lead to political action. Or, organizing for political consciousness raising can in turn create the network of acquaintenceships and friendships which can be the base for a self-defense force.

        The author is correct that whites must look to themselves for protection, not governments usually controlled by (((hostile elites))) and/or active race traitor-collaborators. This also means a new politics relentlessly focused on opposing anything which weakens us and strengthens our enemies; specifically, stopping immigration (and deporting nonwhites wherever feasible); protecting white access to the means of personal defense (which includes both preserving or restoring gun rights, and maximizing the scope of self-defense rights); and reforming Western militaries and police forces in ways which maximize the number of real white soldiers, and minimize the presence of nonwhites and white traitors.

        I hope for more and lengthier posts from this author.

  2. nineofclubs
    Posted October 1, 2020 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article covering many important ideas. Keep them coming, Mr Taietti.

  3. wanred
    Posted October 2, 2020 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    I like your take on current events but I felt the article was too short and only touched on interesting notions that I would like to see elaborated on: Are Facebook et al really interested in becoming rent-a-cops? How is the strategy mentioned working out for Golden Dawn?

    • Guido T.
      Posted October 2, 2020 at 2:49 am | Permalink

      You’re totally right; I’ll write a more deep and complete article soon about the same argoments.

  4. SRP
    Posted October 8, 2020 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Data mining by Google. I have no doubt that electronic dossiers on people are being collected, gathering search terms, websites visited, comments made online, etc. Sounds like paranoia, but the economic and political power afforded by such data aggregation are irresistible, so it must be happening. And it is being done by corporations, not government.

    Between mining for sales/marketing to mining for discovery of political allegiance, is a very short path. I guess we can just wait for a knock on the door.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.
 
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
 
Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Our Titles

    White Identity Politics

    The World in Flames

    The White Nationalist Manifesto

    From Plato to Postmodernism

    The Gizmo

    Return of the Son of Trevor Lynch's CENSORED Guide to the Movies

    Toward a New Nationalism

    The Smut Book

    The Alternative Right

    My Nationalist Pony

    Dark Right: Batman Viewed From the Right

    The Philatelist

    Novel Folklore

    Confessions of an Anti-Feminist

    East and West

    Though We Be Dead, Yet Our Day Will Come

    White Like You

    The Homo and the Negro, Second Edition

    Numinous Machines

    Venus and Her Thugs

    Cynosura

    North American New Right, vol. 2

    You Asked For It

    More Artists of the Right

    Extremists: Studies in Metapolitics

    Rising

    The Importance of James Bond

    In Defense of Prejudice

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (2nd ed.)

    The Hypocrisies of Heaven

    Waking Up from the American Dream

    Green Nazis in Space!

    Truth, Justice, and a Nice White Country

    Heidegger in Chicago

    The End of an Era

    Sexual Utopia in Power

    What is a Rune? & Other Essays

    Son of Trevor Lynch's White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    The Lightning & the Sun

    The Eldritch Evola

    Western Civilization Bites Back

    New Right vs. Old Right

    Lost Violent Souls

    Journey Late at Night: Poems and Translations

    The Non-Hindu Indians & Indian Unity

    Baader Meinhof ceramic pistol, Charles Kraaft 2013

    Jonathan Bowden as Dirty Harry

    The Lost Philosopher, Second Expanded Edition

    Trevor Lynch's A White Nationalist Guide to the Movies

    And Time Rolls On

    The Homo & the Negro

    Artists of the Right

    North American New Right, Vol. 1

    Some Thoughts on Hitler

    Tikkun Olam and Other Poems

    Under the Nihil

    Summoning the Gods

    Hold Back This Day

    The Columbine Pilgrim

    Confessions of a Reluctant Hater

    Taking Our Own Side

    Toward the White Republic

    Distributed Titles

    Reuben

    The Node

    The New Austerities

    Morning Crafts

    The Passing of a Profit & Other Forgotten Stories

    Gold in the Furnace

    Defiance