847 words
It’s interesting to note that, following the shooting of a number of Black churchgoers and their minister by Dylann Storm Roof, a young man apparently motivated by a sense of racial revenge, the Liberal Left is not calling for the abolition or racism but instead is focusing its wan energies on the banning of guns.
The first article I saw, following this act of violence, was this one by the Guardian’s token Black writer Gary Younge: “Charleston church shooting: Without gun control, racism will keep killing black people.”
Racism isn’t dead. We know this because it keeps killing black people.
The fact that Clementa Pinckney, a state senator, was among the dead indicates that nobody is safe. The fact that it took place in a church during a prayer meeting indicates that nowhere is safe.
America does not have a monopoly on racism. But what makes its racism so lethal is the ease with which people can acquire guns.
Notice the glaring, reality-free assumption that racism only ever kills Black people and never the other way round. But just as important is the unwitting assumption in the article’s headline that the way to go is to abolish guns, not racism, even if all they mean by that term is White racism. This is actually not Younge’s view as he correctly remains entirely cynical about America ever banning guns, but it is the main position being taken by the Left in America, as revealed by the comments of America’s own lame duck Black President:
Now is the time for mourning and for healing. But let’s be clear. At some point, we as a country will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries. It doesn’t happen in other places with this kind of frequency. And it is in our power to do something about it. I say that recognizing the politics in this town foreclose a lot of those avenues right now. But it’d be wrong for us not to acknowledge it, and at some point, it’s going to [be] important for the American to come to grips with it, and for us to be able to shift how we think about the issue of gun violence collectively. (italics added)
Liberals and Leftists are well-known for their love of unrealistic panaceas and utopias. Indeed, that was the reason many of them voted for Obama in the first place, motivated by the hope that having a Black President would signal the start of a post-racial era. How has that worked out? Race relations in America are now almost as bad as they were in 1968 – in fact worse, as there are no more cards left to play.
The alacrity with which the Left has jumped on the gun control band wagon over this case is yet more proof of their busted flush. Even Obama’s comments, which have already alarmed so many in the powerful pro-gun lobby, are tentative. Linguistic analysis suggests they are larded with their own defeat and future irrelevance:
I say that recognizing the politics in this town foreclose a lot of those avenues right now.
Great words from a politician who will be gone next year! His statement is also predicated on an impossibility:
. . . it’s going to be important for…us to be able to shift how we think about the issue of gun violence collectively.
America thinking collectively and in liberal lockstep! LOL. Any sane person knows that gun control is not going to happen, especially at a time when America’s police are being leashed in and held back in case some low IQ thug or rampaging mob suffers a broken fingernail.
Gun rights are also the main beneficiary of the ever-growing cynicism that people feel about the failed policies of the ruling elites:
If you are for gun control, then you are not against guns, because the guns will be needed to disarm people. So it’s not that you are anti-gun. You’ll need the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns. So you are very pro-gun, you just believe that only the Government (which is, of course, so reliable, honest, moral and virtuous) should be allowed to have guns. There is no such thing as gun control. There is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political elite and their minions. — Stefan Molyneux (from his Facebook page)
Given how hard it would be to actually institute gun control in a country as large, dysfunctional, and welded to a tradition of gun ownership as America, the Left’s focus on it is a de facto admission that racism is ineradicable. Of course racism, or simple racial consciousness of one’s group and interests, can never be abolished. This is one of the foundation stones of the New Right and the Alternative Right. But it is nice to see that this point is also implicitly admitted by our enemies. Perhaps this constitutes the first step to arriving at realistic solutions to the hitherto irresolvable problems of the modern multicultural state.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
22 comments
In this time of demonizing the white man I did a double take at work when on CNN the interviewer was saying how these nice people (the blacks) were studying the bible when amongst them was the devil himself ( a white man).
What you said about gun control never being able to happen at a time when the police are leashed in is so very correct. The left, and the media, just keep on presenting distorted news stories to fit the anti-white narrative, not understanding the consequences of their actions. For example, the most recent example, the “McKinney pool party”, which the media keeps on casting as a racist issue (“big bad ‘rich’ white people not letting poor innocent blacks swim in the pool”), when the reality is that it is a private property and trespassing issue. So now a policeman who came at the call of legitimate residents who were being attacked by invading and attacking blacks who trespassed into the private community pool now has lost his career and is in hiding. So what’s next, the lawless will invade our living rooms and bedrooms with impunity? We will enforce our property rights and our safety ourselves if the police are hamstrung from doing it. Also, we see the example of South Africa, except that blacks aren’t 80% of the population here but more like 15%. Still, when white farmers in South African can’t protect themselves from being tortured, raped, and suffering horrendous deaths, there’s not a whole lot the government here can do to take away the guns of knowledgeable American citizens (maybe the Bostonians and the New Yorkers will give in without a fight, well, good riddance, there…), but I wouldn’t expect the bulk of Americans to ever give in. Definitely not now.
Manchurian Candidate
If this guy was a plant somehow, then this will be very effective. Not sure what the world is coming to.
Another jewish psyop operation like the “Sandy Hook Hoax.” The jews brainwashed this young man and turned him loose. Ever since the successful jewish psyop the “Dunblane School Massacre” made the ownership of privately owned firearms illegal in the United Kingdom, the jews have been trying to replicate that success here. I was surprised that the jews with their policy of incrementalism allowed Barack Obama to conduct the “Sandy Hook operation” and now this “Charleston Church Shooting operation.” Barack is such a lightweight, non-entity he peaked with the socialization of medicine (which was his original assignment) . Barack Obama was not able to create a storm of anti-gun legislation with the “Sandy Hook Hoax;” why do the jews think he will be anymore successful with this “Charleston Church operation?” I am convinced that the jews are behind all these school massacres. You will notice that before the immigration reform of 1965 school shootings and massacres were almost unheard of. I think there was only one incident of a disgruntled farmer blowing up a school prior to 1965. The thought processes of white people do not run to killing children when they are stressed out, work place shootings would be more realistic. No, I reiterate the jews are behind all these school shootings and church massacres, they are seeking “maximum emotional impact” to fuel anti-gun legislation.
I see no point in entertaining unproven speculation. It just makes us look like paranoids.
There is no evidence that Sandy Hook was a hoax.
I consider this to be a hoax as well, for a number of reasons:
1) The attack was on a church – these are rarely if ever, the focal point of white nationalist hostility. [Mosques and synagogues maybe, temples even – but churches?]
However, churches – as the symbols of the USA’s Christian heritage, are something another group (you know who) hates. Moreover, having the attack take place in the church – appeals to the Christian wing of the Republican party – precisely the kind of people who might otherwise oppose the agenda that the manufacturers of this hoax intended.
2) The ostensible shooter fits the description of a patsy – in the words of Webster Tarpley – ‘people who clearly don’t have the mental capacity for the crimes that they are charged with.’ Compare him with Anders Behring-Breivik – and it’s evident that he’s not remotely in the same league.
3) The timing – as others have noted – coincides with the vote over the controversial TPP.
4) The shooter supposedly complained about blacks raping whites – yet the majority of his victims (if I’m not mistaken) were women. How ridiculous.
They’re really slipping with the quality of these hoaxes. By now, you’d think more people could realize that these events resemble a B-grade movie because….
[I know Mr. Johnson does not want counter-currents to be considered a cesspool of conspiracy-thinking and paranoia; a certain respectability is necessary to gain influence. However, there’s no need to defer to everything the mainstream media feeds us, and to accept its lies and fabrications at face value in order to gain respectability. Indeed, it is often more respectable to treat its narrative with the contempt it richly deserves.]
These shoddy hoaxes have all the marks of reality. Perhaps ZOG will consult you to improve its products.
While I think some conspiracy theories are nonsensical and farfetched, I also think it is rational to question the official narratives put out by the government and media. However, the government and media seems to be flamboyantly open about its agendas and intentions rather than acting in a clandestine manner like conspiracy theories posit. It is clear that they will use any event as an excuse to trash the founding stock of this country and push their culturally damaging agendas. Rather than speculating about jewish operatives secretly training mind controlled assassins, it is more important to speak out against the absurd narratives being pushed in the open and provide our people with intelligent counter points to win cultural battles.
All excellent points, but let’s not forget that police brutality is a genuine problem (albeit much less from White dislike of Blacks than from generalized police corruption). For that matter, I was recently apprised of the story of a White Nationalist brutally beaten by cops once handcuffed (they blamed his black eye on ‘broken glass’) whom citizen advocates have been forbidden to see on the basis that their drivers’ licenses were ‘illegible’. http://thefifthcolumnnews.com/2015/04/police-accountability-groups-repeatedly-denied-access-to-prisoner/
Police officers will always abuse and kill whites that they perceive as racist at every opportunity. I have said it before, the police are never our friends, they will kill white nationalists in a heartbeat and brag about it in the break room afterwards.
Does anyone believe this strange “Storm Roof” lad is NOT just another pay-op pawn? (Raymond, why don’t you play solitaire.) Perhaps it’s so obvious no one bothers to mention it anymore.
psy-op, that is
Rampant daily acts of Anti White Terrorism by blacks = SILENCE;90% black on black homicide rate = SILENCE. If White people had a country of Our own THIS would not be happening.
I really hate this guy for what he has done. There was another case like this with an old klansman that shot some people at a Jewish community center, or other. Even if WN have the most articulate message in the world it won’t matter. The message would be drowned out by this kind of God-awful violence. Of course, it might not matter if we are articulate or not anyway.
You hate this guy because the anti-white media will use it to say anti-white things??? Who cares what the media says at this point, nobody with a brain believes anything the media says. As for the church, I am not all that remorseful due to that “historic temple of worship” being a Marxist staging point of using the dindu’s to attack, riot, and loot against white society for over 75 years. The medias megaphoning of all white infractions no matter how small, and then barely whispers when there is a black on white violence has become obvious to all.
That’s the first time that I have heard blacks described as “dindus!” Is that an Aussie or South African descriptive?
It is an African American term: Trayvon “dindu nuffin.” Michael Brown “dindu nuffin.”
“Don’t do the cowardly thing and shoot defenceless God fearing men, women and children in their churches and places of worship, find some drug pushers, some pimps, some thieves or muggers — or find a corrupt politician – but visit your violence upon somebody who deserves it, so we can at least respect you for it afterwards.”
.
http://www.westernspring.co.uk/boom-boom-boom-boom/
A point that has been overlooked in this article, and elsewhere in commentary on this issue by our like-minded folk, is that the first released photo of Dylan Roof showed him wearing a jacket emblazoned with the original flags of South Africa and Rhodesia.
.
From this image and the surname “Roof” we can perhaps assume that he is of Dutch extraction. Is this recent unconscionable violence in retaliation for the ethnic cleansing of Whites in southern Africa[1]?
.
.
[1] https://www.change.org/p/european-commission-allow-all-white-south-africans-the-right-to-return-to-europe http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.co.uk/
.
Charleston Shooting: What They’re Not Telling You: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsTykXcyLXQ
You might be on to something there. That may add an interesting twist. Also, I think we should expect some kind of Black retaliation, not that there is any shortage of Black-on-White violence anyway.
I am worried about what is going to happen to this lad after he goes to prison. I hope he is sent to a prison with a strong chapter of the Aryan Brotherhood, and they take him under their wing. Perhaps he should have killed himself after the deed; he obviously did not think it through.
Comments are closed.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment