Counter-Currents
Artemisia Gentileschi, “Judith and Holofernes,” ca. 1620 oil on canvas Florence, Galleria degli Uffizi
1,424 words
Czech version here
Gentiles, all Gentiles (well, almost all), love the Jews. More than that, they worship them. Why?
There are many reasons, but one is Jews’ innate brutality.
As Sigmund Freud, following French psychologist Gustave Le Bon, wrote in Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1922), a group “respects force,” and “What it demands of its heroes is strength or even violence. It wants to be ruled and oppressed and to fear its masters.”
What are a few things virtually synonymous with Jews?
Communism and the murder of tens of millions in Russia and Eastern Europe, “unconditional surrender,” the Morgenthau Plan, the development of the A-bomb to destroy Central Europe, terrorism, Zionism, Irgun, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), Mossad, contemporary war-making, endless foreign intervention and “revolutions from above,” the “Russian” and Jewish mafias, “American” mobsters like Dutch Schultz, Louis “Lepke” Buchalter, and Meyer Lansky, Murder, Inc., the ADL, SPLC, JDL and JDO, AIPAC, the US Justice Department’s Office of Special Investigations (OSI), disgusting decades-long persecutions of Ernst Zündel, John Demjanjuk, and dozens of other innocent people, assassination, torture, political correctness, “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws, replacement migration, and arbitrary imprisonment or reputational and financial ruin for exercising one’s freedom of speech or thought.
Strip away the Persecution Myth, the preposterous fairy tale of the “poor, persecuted Jew,” and one is left with Jews as they really are: wealthy, powerful, domineering, self-centered, greedy, lying, cruel, indifferent to the suffering and rights of others, socially, educationally, financially, politically, and ethnically advantaged, racist, top dog, intolerant, violent, mass murdering, genocidal.
Jews are the Bully writ large, quasi-psychotic, not right in the head. (One of their famous gangsters was nicknamed “Bugsy” for that reason.) Paradoxically, this fundamental disconnect from reality enhances rather than detracts from their power.
Jewish behavior is not constrained by internal morality or external laws. And no de facto countervailing power exists.
When present in sufficient numbers, and their power becomes consolidated, Jews distort both state and culture.
The state becomes little more than a Jewish instrument or tool, a criminal enterprise vested with the veneer of authority. The governments of the world, including transnational and international organizations, are thereby delegitimized. Force and power supplant organic forms of authority.
In the Jewish-Gentile dynamic, Jews represent the masculine principle, whites the feminine, Jews the brutal sadists, whites the adoring masochists. The greater the psychological, emotional, and physical abuse the victims suffer, the more admiring they become. And it is no false adoration.
Whites are demure, available coquettes in the presence of the psychologically commanding Jew.
Fear of the Jews
Closely related to the same Jewish evil is a diametrically opposite response: “fear of the Jews.” Some whites fail to challenge Jewish attacks upon their race, culture, religion, customs, laws, liberties, or persons not because they love Jews, but because they fear them.
Such fear is well-grounded.
Therefore, one might mistakenly imagine that, in general, fear motivates professions and acts of devotion, while secretly abhorrence trumps fealty.
But it seems likely that genuine love for and worship of Jews is a much greater contributor to Jewish success and power than fear.
Still, there remains the issue of widespread ignorance due to lies and censorship. Most whites are probably completely unaware of the truth about Jews.
If they knew it, would they hate them?
Jews assume so. That’s one reason rigid censorship goes hand-in-hand with Jewish power. (Totalitarianism is also innate to them.)
But simply because Jews are convinced the truth would harm them does not make it so. Jews entertain many crackpot notions. Conceivably, currently clueless whites could respond to the truth with heightened adoration.
Yet Jews think not. Perhaps they’re right. At any rate, censorship has become obligatory. It’s good for the Jews!
Admiration Exposed
You can buy Tito Perdue’s novel Opportunities in Alabama Agriculture here.
Philo-Semitism rooted in admiration for brutality is understandably not openly expressed very often. Still, it exists.
One vivid example I recall is a syndicated opinion column from the 1980s or ’90s by conservative writer Jeffrey Hart, a longtime fixture of William Buckley’s National Review.
Hart described in loving detail, and with unbridled enthusiasm, the Israeli assassination of a Palestinian or Arab. I believe the victim was a dissident poet or literary figure. The Jews killed the man by booby trapping his telephone handset with a bomb. To detonate it, they simply rang him up.
The writer could hardly contain himself as he described with joy how the explosion blew the man’s head off, causing it to roll across the floor.
Hart, a professor of English Literature at Dartmouth College, has a surname that could go either way, was born in Brooklyn, and graduated from Columbia University. But I think he’s white anyway. If he’s Jewish, the column simply expressed innate Jewish brutality. I strongly suspect, though, that his paean to politically-correct assassination was the demented expression of a certain type of white soul.
Another example, not explicitly relishing the Jewish lust for homicide, but nonetheless indicative of deep admiration for Jewish aggression and power, is the following statement by movie director John Huston (The Maltese Falcon, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, Key Largo, The Asphalt Jungle):
[Hollywood is] the jungle. It appeals to my nature [emphasis added]. . . . It’s more than a place where streets are named after Sam Goldwyn and buildings after Bing Crosby. There is more to it than pink Cadillacs with leopard-skin seat covers. It’s the jungle, and it harbors an industry that’s one of the biggest in the country. A closed-in, tight, frantically inbred, and frantically competitive jungle. And the rulers of the jungle are predatory and fascinating and tough. L. B. Mayer is one of the rulers of the jungle. I like L. B. He’s a ruler now, but he has to watch his step or he’ll be done in. He’s shrewd. He’s big business. . . . L. B. is tough. He’s never trying to win the point you’re talking about. His aim is always long-range—to keep control of the studio. He loves Dore [movie executive Dore Schary, subsequently National Chairman of the ADL]. But someday he’ll destroy Dore. L. B. is sixty-five. And he’s pink. And healthy. And smiling. Dore is about twenty years younger. And he looks old. And sick. And worried. Because L. B. guards the jungle like a lion. But the very top rulers of the jungle are here in New York. Nick Schenck, the president of Loew’s Inc., the ruler of the rulers, stays here in New York and smiles, watching from afar, from behind the scenes, but he’s the real power, watching the pack close in on one or another of the lesser rulers, close in, ready to pounce! Nick Schenck never gets his picture in the papers, and he doesn’t go to parties, and he avoids going out in public, but he’s the real king of the pack. And he does it all from New York! God, are they tough! (Quoted in Lillian Ross, Picture, 1952, pp. 11–12.)
Yes, they’re tough.
As Huston well knew, the movie capital was a hotbed of upper class Communism and deviance.
It also furnishes lush soil for organized crime. A “Golden Age” example is Columbia Pictures’ well-connected president Harry Cohn. When Ronald Reagan was governor of California, he called upon his Hollywood connections to enlist the services of a Jewish racketeer to end a troublesome strike. And recently Hollywood’s attraction to gangster/private eye Anthony Pellicano continued this unbroken tradition.
Hollywood was established partly for the purpose of violating Thomas Edison’s motion picture patents, for which early Jewish moguls refused to pay royalties. Since Edison’s enterprise was based in the East, the pirates fled to Hollywood to escape costly legal fees. California was remote enough from Edison’s reach that Jewish entrepreneurs could effectively pirate his inventions without practical fear of sanctions, despite operating in violation of the law.
This is the sort of “toughness” Huston admired, though he was politic enough not to spell it out so explicitly. But he knew all about it.
Hart’s and Huston’s fervent philo-Semitism typifies the feelings of all too many goyim. They fully understand what’s happening, but don’t care—indeed are enthusiastic about it. To such Gentiles, Jews are more gods than demigods. Even popes bow to their “elder brothers” and “fathers“ in the faith.
Humanity seems deeply attracted to the sort of atavism, cruelty, viciousness, hatred, and iniquity Jews personify. So in a sense it has chosen (or, rather, had imposed upon it) a near-perfect god, ideally suited to its black soul.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
57 comments
Well, Huston clearly wasn’t admiring these bosses because they were Jewish, but because they were tough, like him. That hardly makes him a “philosemite”.
Overall, this article is the sort of Jew-bashing demonology I find rather silly, because it doesn’t bring real insight into the Jewish Question, but rather simplifies an anthropological problem (like violence/bullying and the masses, the sadomasochism of power relations) by focussing it on Jewish groups as if they alone were Evil incarnated and nothing but and no-one else but them. The issue isn’t Jews vs. Humanity here. That is misleading – it is a real issue of humanity, who “loves” its brutes and mass killers.
Or does it? I hardly think that it is true that Gentiles actually “love” and “worship” Jews. When it comes to Jews hypocrisy is huge. Hell, I don’t even know people who honestly and truely like them. If so it is mostly rather the victim image they fall for. The things named “virtually synonymous with Jews” are not those “virtually synonymous” as far as the mainstream is concerned – only few people have an idea of Stalinist Russia’s elites or what the Irgun was. “Cruelty, viciousness, hatred,iniquity” aren’t personified by Jews for most people (they rather think of “Nazis”), nor do these seem exclusive Jewish traits for me.
Also it blows the alleged Jewish commanding dominance out of proportion, and makes Whites look too much like sissies. Sorry to say, but it reads like phantasy straight from a S/M novel for White Nationalists. No, that is too much obsessive demonising going here for my taste.
I think that Hamilton is onto something here. Particularly in right wing circles, philosemitism and pro-Zionism provides an outlet to sublimate the fascistic, aggressive tendencies of otherwise gelded conservatives.
If you want to understand philosemitism, then the crowd mind’s feminine submission to brute power is definitely part of the equation. It is irrelevant that Jews tend to be physical weakling and cowards as individuals. It is irrelevant that they are cowards when faced with strength. Because right now they are united and in a position of dominance, and they are acting the part.
Perhaps there’s a parvenu mentality at work here. As Leszek Kolakowski defined it, a parvenu is someone who grovels to those above him and tramples upon those beneath him.
Thanks for including the painting by Artemisia Gentileschi of Judith and Holofernes. She is a particular heroine of mine. I figure the violence of this scene is the sublimated result of the artist’s own rape. However, I do not know for sure.
Jewish women in the Bible are often depicted as seductive, aggressive, a slayer or betrayer. They are also soundly denounced by Christian theologians who may in their inmost hearts harbour fantasies.
I do not think this post demonizes at all. Jews manipulate and seduce and love gratuitous violence. Just read the old testament. They have taught us to love it too. It is very sexy. The devil is that which distracts to use Christian terms.
I do not believe that there are any whites who sincerely admire the Jews when they see them for what they truly are. The masses love a strong leader, certainly, but not a vicious one. They want a noble God, not a super mafioso. That is why Hitler and Mussolini were adored. White people are not as ignoble as Mr. Hamilton supposes!
I don’t really agree with the article either.
Jews are not darkness incarnate, they’re just a group of humans with a parasitic tendency. From what I know, Jews are often very cowardly when they’re not in positions of power.
I think you are attacking a straw man. Jews are the dominant force in the white world today, and it behooves us to explore the origins of our misfortune. Jews are nothing more than a highly ethnocentric, parasite tribe. A high end version of the gypsies. And they would be no more significant than the gypsies if they did not control our destinies. What explains our submission to these people? Part of it is the feminine submission to the dominant power.
Greg, the gypsies own up to what they are. I saw some on tv saying, “We don’t like to work, that’s why we’re thieves. We will always be this way.”
I suppose that part of the neo-conservative admiration for Jews is their brutal attitude. I’ve noticed this about several conservative Americans before; that they’ve been told not to be proud of their own ethnic group, so instead they’re nationalistic for the Israelis. So we end up with this Israel-worshipping militarism.
Of course, that’s only a part of it. Another important part is that we’re conditioned to see the Jews as “poor victims”, and feel sorry for them.
I don’t buy the stories about gelded white males. Men simply do not change so quickly. Many white soldiers still fight very bravely, only in the wrong wars.
The white man’s sense of honour requires him not only to fight valiantly, but also for a just cause, to fight and sacrifice himself for his people and the greater good. This idealism is the distinguishing feature of superior, culture creating peoples, according to Hitler ( this may not sit well with narcissistic Nietzsche aficionado’s ).
Whites do not lay down their lives for Jewish mafia bosses, but for the noble vision of rescuing innocent Jewish victims. Their sense of moral obligation even requires them to attack intimate friends if these appear to attack these “poor innocent victims”.
It is all a question of ideology. The reigning ideology endorses absolutely fighting for Jews, and therefore you will see whites fighting with enormous bravery for the Jews. I guess those so called “philosemitic” whites do not love Jews as such (who could?), only their own heroism.
White conservatives are not gelded, they can be extremely aggressive, they are just misled. They do love militarism, they do want fascism, but it MUST be for a just cause. When their actions are thus sanctioned, they display a great fighting spirit.
Jewish domination is not at all caused by open brutishness, on the contrary. Jews use deceit and moral and emotional blackmail to have the white heroes do their bidding. This is consistent with their effeminate, hysterical nature.
The “satanic” character of the Jews lies exactly in the corruption and abuse of the best a white man has: his idealism, his sense of honour and duty.
When the Jews show their brutishness, for example in Palestine, it causes more and more whites to doubt the fairness of the Jewish cause, and become opposed to it. That is how Israel lost the support of the European left. And on the right, those who have seen through the deceit won’t submit anymore, either.
The Jews guard the Holocaust story as their most precious asset, their scepter to rule the white peoples. They demolish any attempt to steal this holy victimhood from them, for example by the Gypsies.
But there is hope, because nonetheless the lies WILL fall. White eyes will be opened, and revenge will be swift to follow.
Rabbi: Gentiles jealous of chosen people
‘They hate us because we are ‘called by the name of the Lord”
http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/rabbi-gentiles-jealous-of-chosen-people/?cat_orig=faith
(We can think of other reasons…)
In Genesis, the Jews wrote of themselves that God gave Abraham the power of “judgment and justice” over the world. Later, Jacob (“Israel” eventually) cheats his father-in-law through a genetic selection breeding experiment with the livestock. The tactic worked, and Jacob profited with the best of the herds.
Of course, the origin of the rot is the acceptance of Christianity, not just the Jew religion but the religion of the Jew, i.e., literal worship of a Jew. The Roman Church, as Evola noted, was a compromise formation, which is why the Prots whine about its “paganism”. Protism itself, of course, is the resurgence of the True Jew: sola scriptura = only Jew books; corruption of the will = castration.
Thus, feminization. Interesting that Weininger and others have identified the Jew as the “feminized” male. Does Christianity serve to ‘offload’ this onto the goyim?
There’s always a creepy fagginess to Christianity. Groveling worship of the all powerful Yah, priests in dresses on the one hand, wimpy Flanderses on the other. The crucifix, a ‘verkrempte Jessele” as the old Jew grandma said of her peek into a church, flaunting his “swimmer’s physique” as Dennis on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia says.
The key here is that Christianity promotes both fagginess [Flanders] AND “family values” a la the Jew. The true Homo of the Mannerbund, free of family and society, is verboten. Notice how the Church, like the military, the Boy Scouts, the schools, etc. is obsessed with “no homo” but filled with… fags? Men in skirts who have never had a woman denounce the “disordered nature” of homos. Alexander the Great is dishonorably discharged as a fag, but Bales [Christian Bales?] is welcomed — rip off a family’s life savings, like a good Jew, then join the Army!
Last week, revealed that a Catholic orphanage in Ireland dealt with accusations of child molestation in the 50s by having the accusers castrated to “cure their homosexuality.” Christendom in a nutshell.
I have a deep respect for the beserkers and the men of the mannerbunde. I just want them on my side. They scare the heck out of me. What are you fighting for?
I agree about the men in skirts. I do like men in kilts though, especially a whole army of them. (for protection, I can cook, really!).
I admire the mannerbund and think they are necessary for society. It’s not so much “Why do you fight?”. But “What do you have to lose?” For the married man with children, it is everything, and for the mannerbund, it is nothing (but himself). I believe that is why the push towards frivolous, destructive behavior and/or “family formation” from The Enemy.
O’Meara makes a good point about the fagginess of Christianity- I would say not so much with Catholicism, but most certainly Protestantism. If anyone has ever had the misfortune of visiting a Pentacostal or Baptist church you will see grown men in short sleeved button down shirts and khakis, balding and puffy, unable to control their weeping because they just fucking love this dude so much. Blubbering, unserious fools tripping over their tongues to serve Israel. I don’t know how any of these women could take a man like that seriously. Every time I see it I always want to go all Godfather on them: “YOU CAN ACT LIKE A MAN!!!”
I think he might be on to something. Since we have lost touch with our own Warrior Tradition, we are vulnerable to admiring their’s. To admire is a need after all and a starving man will eat grass: Black Athletes and Jewish Strong Men.
Hitler said they were harder than Whites are now. Just one more reason he wanted them out of Europe.
Yes, white males are gelded, and the only approved outlets for their aggressive and competitive instincts is worshiping blacks and fighting wars stirred up by Jews.
THEIR GOAL IS GENOCIDE. OURS. WHAT’S YOURS?
If memory serves, Hart is a Gentleman of Color. The National Review was one of the most philosemitic publications ever. Financed by Jewish supporters, it was the Trojan Horse that took point in converting (Taft) Conservatism to neo-Conservatism, at all points having as the central point of its foreign policy one question: “Is it good for Jews?”
Greg Johnson hits on a point that is more correct than many might accept, because of what it implies about them, and the course of their lives.
The “Progressives” have had over a century of practice in turning us into their Idea of what we should be – soft, quiet, gentle, and tranquil grass-eaters. The Frankfurt School took full advantage of this nutrient-rich environment. The wide-spread adoption of color television, starting in 1964, and the Religion of Mandated Equality have resulted in far too many people trapped n a learned helplessness framed by Bateson’s double-bind.
In effect, far too many of us are too soft to even see clearly, much less make decisions, much less act with masculine certitude upon them. They deal with this by retreating into fantasy worlds, with drugs to dull the pain, and World of Warcraft to compensate for their self-selected softnss in other areas.
So, they, like women, become as soft and weak as water, flowing in blind service to Power, wherever it is found, in whatever Form it may take.
I’ve noticed that the Jewish advocates in the media all, to a one, describe Israel as “a people that is tough, and will fight like Hell.” True, providing it is someone else’s blood being shed in the service of Judaism. Anyone remember (was it) Michelle Bachmann’s statement to a Jewish group in Florida, “We want to be like you”? Talk of baring your throat to the Alpha wolves…
The two advantages the Jewish Race has over us – incredible organization, in a common ethnocentric purpose that controls all actions – can be easily replicated. Our own metapolitical project can be defined in actionable terms with one simple criteria, borrowed from Bob Whitaker’s eminent commentators: “Is it pro-White?”
Period.
One of the problems with historically defined White Nationalism is it’s ability to appeal to the head – “We are correct!” – while ignoring an appeal to the Heart. Yet, it is the heart that moves us to action. We ACT on feelings. The best Ideas, absent emotional identification, remain suspended in a state of Platonic perfection. Look at how easily Derren Brown manipulated people in “The Heist” by shaping and controlling their emotional responses to external stimuli.
You DO see a response to this need for emotional power, and validation of those emotional responses by appropriate Authority Figures – “The Tribe,” for example – and we can work with this.
Those of us who “love” them do so only out of sense of helplessness, and the acceptance of their cuckoo’s egg in our emotional nest.
All of these issues can be dealt with in an “apple-pie, strictly legal, sort of way” (HT: Jim Giles) by simply replacing THEIR values with ours.
“Is it pro-White?”
That is the overarching theme for all issues, great and small. Emotional identification with the outcomes will insure productive activity, for a welcome change.
Summing up, the weak among us need
conquerorsa Patriarchal Leadership. Lead by Example, and the best of them will follow. If they don’t, wish them well, and move forward, becoming the living foundation of a new nation, based in a Homeland for the Racially Conscious Community, the Northwest Republic.What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!
I think the article is extremely valuable, but its conclusion only applies to a few individual whites, and not even to all Neocon whites who are water-carriers for Israel.
The question the author poses is this:
“Gentiles, all Gentiles (well, almost all), love the Jews. More than that, they worship them. Why?”
It’s not, in fact, their strength or brutality that makes Jews love whites, but the belief that the Jews are perpetual victims. Ours is the ultimate era of slave morality and the worship of the underdog, the victim; thus the more slave-like, the more victimized a group makes itself appear, the more it makes whites feel good to love them.
We, here, are aware of Jewish brutality, but the general public has been conditioned not to see it; in fact, to see the opposite. We, here, recognize the Jews as the controllers of culture, but the general public (or, let me specify, the white general public) still sees them as the underdog.
If the public ever came to recognize the Jews as the dragon, not the dragonslayers, as the bullies, not the bullied, they would turn from them.
And in that respect, the article is very valuable, in that it exposes and enumerates Jewish brutality. If there were more public awareness of this, it would not lead to more Gentile love of the Jews, but less.
This has been the Jews’ greatest trick: becomes the victimizers while still playing the role of victims, in a time when victimhood is seen as a badge of moral superiority.
Whoops. Typo.
“It’s not, in fact, their strength or brutality that makes Jews love whites…” should obviously read, “It’s not, in fact, their strength or brutality that makes whites love Jews…”
Quote: “Ours is the ultimate era of slave morality and the worship of the underdog, the victim; thus the more slave-like, the more victimized a group makes itself appear, the more it makes whites feel good to love them.”
This analysis of course originates with Nietzsche, and I think it is blatantly one-sided.
I agree that our culture tends to like the underdog too much, but no one “worships” the underdog. Our heroes are still the great explorers, commanders and kings, much to the frustration of the liberals.
Furthermore, one should distinguish between an undue love for the underdog and a manly love of justice: the noble white knight who rescues the INNOCENT. A love of “fair play” does not at all have the detrimental effects that a preference for low-lives has, on the contrary.
The external actions may be the same, but there is a world of difference between a love of low-lives and a love of justice. This is something Nietzsche does not consider.
In Christian theology, the preference for low-lives may stem from the idea that we are all sinners who need the grace of God. The justice of God however, points towards the other motivation.
Yes, white males are gelded, and the only approved outlets for their aggressive and competitive instincts is worshiping blacks and fighting wars stirred up by Jews.
Indeed! I thought it was a great article. We see this in movies, Scar Face, and Wall Street, both directed by Oliver Stone, two romances of the vicious, calculating, human animal, much adored by the American dough boy.
But why? I’ll-rip-off-his- head-and-suck-his-scull Gordon Gecko gives us the clue in his manual for business, SunTzu’s, Art of War. No society can function when individuals are engaged in such thinking and Jews have no psychology directed toward building societies.
Brian de Palma was the director of Scarface.
The confusion is easily explained: Oliver Stone wrote the screenplay of Scarface and Brian De Palma directed it.
The Jew understands what the White man seems to have forgotten. Power must be gained by any means necessary. National Socialist Germany was the White man’s last attempt to forcefully regain power from the Jews. Hitler lost the war largely because he under-estimated the brutality and deception of Jewry. We will never regain our power by trying to be “Mr. Nice Guy”. Only a Pan-Aryan Movement that is Militant and Authoritarian can win.
I object to the conflation of white nationalism with Nietzschean or even Machiavellian ideas. This disregards the fundamentally idealistic nature of the white man. But a white man will in the end only fight for a cause he perceives as just.
This fight is not the same as playing “Mr. Nice Guy”. On the contrary, justice adds to the fierceness of the Aryan warrior.
Your error is the assumption that Nietzsche or Machiavelli have no ideals.
Thank you for your feedback. However, both seem very cynical about human nature.
The Jew Rony Guldmann writes that Nietzsche’s “cynicism is best understood as but a tool by which to expose the limitations of slave morality, and does not reveal his most basic views on human nature. ” I shall investigate this claim.
Maybe I am too prejudiced towards Nietzsche, but the fact that so many Jews love his work makes me suspicious of him. The Jews are after all egoists and mafiosi that only stick to each other, not out of idealism, but out of fear for reprisals from the goyim. Not exactly an idealistic mindset I think.
Overall, this was a rather insighful article by Andrew. I think that he has a pretty good read on racial dynamics and race psychology. I do think, however, that when he refers to ‘Whites’, he is obviously refrencing ‘Anglo’ Whites, the most gullible of the “Goyim”. Continental Whites, especially Slavs, are much more Jew-wise, and less intimidated by Jews. Fourmyle also had an incisive take on the subject as well. Jews always portray themselves as victims, never as perpatrators. They have, of course, done this as well with the Negroes: witness the current media agit-prop about the Negro “youth” shot in self defense in Florida by a Mestizo neighborhood watchman. This deceit is typical Jewish boiler plate propaganda used to hoodwink the White milk herd.
Someone mentioned Sun Tzu – we do well to study him and his school. Power is magnified in restraint. And people who are hard outwardly are often soft inwardly. Whites are extroverted but soft inwardly in both mind and heart. Jews the exact opposite – so they rule us. Brains over Brawn? Any day. Or to quote Lao Tzu, “Know the Masculine but cleave to the Feminine.
I see this dichotomy amongst ourselves as well: Conservatives are hard outwardly but soft and sentimental inwardly. Liberals the opposite – so Liberals usually win. Even in meeting people you I see this. Conservative people are gruff and judgemental on first meeting. Liberals warm and welcoming. But let them hear you deviate from the group mind and you’ll feel their steel. Now which life stategy makes more sense in terms of building a Movement? The latter.
“Whites are extroverted but soft inwardly in both mind and heart.
Conservatives are hard outwardly but soft and sentimental inwardly.”
I agree with both points. This, in fact, is why so many ostensibly conservative whites are so vulnerable to Jewish propaganda — not because Jews advertise themselves as being tough and powerful; on the contrary, because Jews present themselves as a vulnerable group that needs protection.
Here’s the real perversity in all of this: Jews present themselves (and Israel) as a damsel in distress that needs protecting from the big bad ogres (“Neo-Nazis,” “the Muslims,” etc.). And it fits into the white-knighting impulse of hard-outwardly-but-soft-inwardly conservatives to want to protect this supposedly vulnerable group.
This argues, in fact, that the whole approach that some White organizations take, of presenting themselves as tough warriors, is counter-productive in attracting the support of mainstream, conservative whites. (1000 Antifa scum badger 15 Blood-and-Honour marchers, and the press still portrays the Blood-and-Honour members as the bullies.) Rather, the opposite approach, an endangered-species rhetoric, a depiction of the fact of ever-increasing white victimazation, would stand a better chance of winning over many thus-far neutral individuals.
It won’t work because Jewish victimhood is a millenia old “meme” of mythic proportions, embedded deep in the Western collective subconscious. Hard to compete with that. Playing the victim card too hard here wouldn’t work, but what could is the emphasis of spectre of the disappearance of the White race(s), which still few can imagine today.
David Duke likes to settle for this tune in his videos, with an emphasis on family values and peaceful self-preservation etc.
Actually, I think that pointing out Jewish brutality might work. Consider this: of all people on the world, the people least likely (one would think) to see things our way are the leftist types. After all, to them, anti-“racism” is a religion. And yet they do condemn Israel for its appalling cruelty. One would think that these leftist types would venerate the Jews above all people; yet the brutality of Israel repulses them.
Also, there was an undercurrent of recognition of Jewish exploitation, of Jews comprising the hated 1%, in the recent Occupy protests.
A little more work on this score, and one might see the crumbling of the Jews’ hitherto-unassailable victim card.
Think of it: the modern “equality” paradigm might finally be wielded against the people who exploited the premise for so long.
What is needed, I believe, is something like a “Loose Change” movie dealing with this topic. NXSchell’s “The Enemy Within” has some elements that could work. One would just need to present the video in terms that the general mass, schooled as it is in egalitarian ideology, would respond to.
Karsten: “the people least likely (one would think) to see things our way are the leftist types”
There isn’t a leftist type, but several different types. Some of them are very naive and suggestible, others are nihilistic with a mean streak… The fact that the leftists support race-replacement and avoid criticism of the Jews is not something natural. It indicates Jewish interference. There is no reason why naive, suggestible, well meaning leftists would wish to destroy the White race. And there is no reason why nasty and angry leftists would decide to hurt White people, rather than Jews and other non-Whites.
On a Voice of Reason radio program, last month (here), I listened to Keith Preston interviewing Thomas N. Naylor, a Vermont secessionist. They were discussing (minute 22) how the anti-war movement on the left was very weak, even though the left is proud of its opposition to the Vietnam war, a few decades ago. According to them, there has been a shift away from the anti-imperialist left towards the PC left (race and gender issues, abortion rights, affirmative action, social programs…). They say there has been a contract with the devil: the Democratic Party told the PC left: we will give you what you want (affirmative action, gay rights, etc), but just keep your mouth shut about corporate America, Wall Street, and issues of war and peace about Israel.
We know that the left is largely organized by Jews. They set the agenda, co-opt the leaders, manipulate people through the media, provide the financing, and so on. If a leftist discovers the Jewish problem, he is no longer classified as a leftist, but as a far-right lunatic. That’s because the Jewish media get to decide who is on the left and who is on the right.
So, it would be very useful to educate some of the leftists about the Jewish problem, Jewish brutality, and the US wars for Israel.
In the Voice of Reason program that I linked to, the Vermont secessionist said something to the effect that he was not a racist and had never protested against race-replacement, except in defense of the Palestinians. As a result, his organization was attacked by the SPLC under the pretext that he talked with other secessionist movements who are more race-conscious than he is.
It shows that it’s very useful to spread information about the Palestinians’ sorry plight. It’s an issue that brings division into the left-wing coalition. The same information should also be shared with all the conservatives who have been neo-conned, so they will come back to our side. In fact, White Nationalists should put on Palestinian keffiehs when they organize street actions.
By the way, David Duke has a new video on that topic. (We are all Palestinians now).
By coincidence, I recently added The Seven Military Classics of Ancient China to my ever-growing reading list. Translated by Ralph D. Sawyer, this book contains Sun Tzu’s The Art of War and six lesser-known works, so it may be regarded as the most comprehensive textbook of Sun Tzu and his school.
In his article “The Unforeseen, the Chinese, and the Favorable Moment,” Dominique Venner noted similarities between ancient Chinese strategy and the metis of the ancient Greeks. I intend to study both. Unfortunately, as Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant note in Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society, the Greeks never produced a treatise on metis, which was deprecated and marginalized by Greek philosophy.
And people who are hard outwardly are often soft inwardly. Whites are extroverted but soft inwardly in both mind and heart. Jews the exact opposite – so they rule us. Brains over Brawn? Any day.
But that is the recipe for a good nation, hard outwardly, soft inwardly. Jews operate nationalism within our nations. Whites allow this for a very superficial reason, they look like us.
Liberals have no understanding of grand politics, but they have an excellent grasp of petty politics. Conservatives have no grasp of politics at all, which is why they are effectively little more than camp followers of liberalism.
I thought more Slavs died than Jews? Slavic collaborators? I wish. Hitler hated us : /
Can you elaborate on this? I’d like to know more.
Unfortunately, Hitler took with him a great frustration with the Slavs, as is quite clear in “Mein Kampf”. In the Austro-Hungarian Empire the leading role of the Germans in the country was more and more subverted by Hungarian and Slav nationalism. Also in “Mein Kampf”, Hitler followed the idea that the Germans should have more “Lebensraum”, and this could only be acquired from the Slavs. This explains Hitler’s fatal mistake not to make the Slavs his real allies. They were more than willing to fight with him against Jewish Bolshevism. History could have turned out so much more positive!
I can’t believe the well deserved eternal victim status of a people who’s name is derived from constantly being the chattel of Europe has been stolen by the people who literally run the world (and made us said chattel).
You may take our lives, but you will never take our techno-folk!
True, more Slavs died than Jews. However, you won’t hear much about that, since the Sacred Six Million have a sort of monopoly. No business like genocide business.
I’m originally from Ukraine, a country that received the brunt of both Stalin’s and Hitler’s policies, so I know quite a bit about this. Ukraine was actually very positive towards the Germans, until they did stuff that made the Holodomor look mild in comparison. It must be said, not all the Nazis were brutal war criminals, and Rosenberg was quite positive about collaborating with the Ukrainians and treating us like allies. The Wehrmacht generals also favored this idea. However, as far as Hitler was concerned, Ukraine was populated by subhuman scum.
I don’t know exactly where Hitler got this attitude from, but it was probably from the Austrian Empire. Someone else here must know better.
I would say that the jews are the masters of human inter group competition. While we europeans (especially north europeans) have fought against nature and the elements to survive in a harsh environment, the jews have instead focused their energy on competing with other people (often without the other people even knowing it). Most of the tacticts of the jews are really the most effective tactics (but devoid of all ethics) when it comes to competition with other ethnic groups but as the parasites they are they could never build a society on their own and their tactics would be distastrous if everbody in the society used them.
Always refreshing to read someone who understands the dynamics of the relationship between the laughable goyim and the dominant Jew. Always depressing to see the predictable excuses.
Even more obvious seems to me the obsession both liberal and rightwing Whites have for Muslims, who are more notoriously open bullies. The Lefties play the feminine part of the intimitated appeaser and clinging beaten wife towards them (a sort of Stockholm syndrom), while the Righties often admire them for being so badass towards liberalism’s holy cows and having all the guts, militance and good conscience for their cause which most Whites nowaday lack.
Reading Hamilton’s opening description of modern Jews, the thought occurred to me, “Are Jews really human?”
One author who thinks not is the eccentric Brit David Icke. Let me stress that I am no one endorsing his science fiction theories, but what if he is right to make us reconsider what we are dealing with?
Jews might not literally be what Icke says, a hybrid between alien reptiles and humans, but they might not be the same kind of human the rest of us are.
I know C-C readers have many unique insights, so I thought I’d solicit them with this comment.
Jewish behavior is not so unique as to lead to the conclusion that they are a distinct species, or even a distinct race, although they are a distinct subrace of Caucasoids. Genetically, Jews are first cousins of Kurds and Armenians. All these peoples are wired for high levels of ethnocentrism as well as high verbal intelligence. But what makes Jews a uniquely malevolent group is their religion and culture. A friend once asked me what would happen if one adopted a Jew and raised it as an Aryan. My somewhat flippant reply is that one would have and Armenian, which is, roughly speaking, true. Armenians are Near Easterners, not Europeans, and although they have roughly the same genetics and occupational profiles as Jews, they show no sign of the malevolence toward Europeans that Jews do. Race does matter, but I think that what makes Jews distinctly hostile to Europeans is their history and culture.
Genetically, Jews are first cousins of Kurds and Armenians. All these peoples are wired for high levels of ethnocentrism as well as high verbal intelligence. But what makes Jews a uniquely malevolent group is their religion and culture.
Armenians built a country. Jews have always existed as a Nation in diaspora, a nation within nations. They spend no energy on class or hierarchy but are able to direct their efforts completely into group competition, while their opponents have larger concerns, the building of a society.
THEIR GOAL IS GENOCIDE. OURS. WHAT’S YOURS?
Greg Johnson in blockquote:
Without becoming too metapolitical, for the moment, can we view Judaism as the EXACT opposite of Christianity? Yes, and this analysis is all the more correct when considered in the context of Lash’s Gnostic definition of the Archons, and their interaction with Mankind.
Incidentally, Dr. Gary North’s father-in-law, Rushdoony, was Armenian. His singular effort in defining Christian Theonomy stands as an example for us all. I believe Dr. North said once that the Armenian’s ran the Jews out of Glendale, California.
No holders of illusions, they!
What’s In YOUR Future? Focus Northwest!
Exactly, the Jews are not a race and you can see this from two facts:
– there are white and black Jews
– you can become a Jew by converting
Judaism is not a race, but an IDEOLOGY of race. The Talmud posits them as a special race, created by God himself. If there ever was a supremacist ideology, this is it.
Jewish behaviour results from a world view in which the Jews are the masters, chosen by God, and all other people are only there to serve the Jews. The Talmud calls them no better than beasts.
Of course, Jewish marriage policy has resulted in genetic similarities amongst many Jews, but Talmud ideology comes first.
Fourmyle of Ceres wrote: “[C]an we view Judaism as the EXACT opposite of Christianity?”
E. Michael Jones essentially takes this approach in his seminal work “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.” Jones is a staunch Catholic and takes Scripture to heart. He starts with St. John’s account that says Jews’ father is of the devil. Since “Jews” (Jones says that the Jews who rejected Christ became a different kind of “Jew”) explicitly rejected Christ, then, yes, they could be seen as the opposite of Christians. Material vs. spiritual, for instance.
Next, Donar Van Holland wrote: “Judaism is not a race, but an IDEOLOGY of race.”
The exceptions you note may be true, but as a practical matter, the vast, vast majority of Jews share enough unique genetic sequences that they do operate as a race. This is a core assumption under which Kevin MacDonald, for one, writes.
Of course, the book on genes and race is not yet finished. No doubt there are many surprises that await us.
Karsten: I wholly agree with you, and if Duke is not having as much success as he should it’s because the most shocking, gruesome atrocities committed against the German people right after 1945 have not been intelligently advertized by the nationalist community. If I were a native English speaker I’d certainly had dozens of YouTube speeches on this subject alone, together with what the Jews did in the Holodomor: a de-brainwash therapy of potentially paradigm-shifting proportions.
“In the Jewish-Gentile dynamic, Jews represent the masculine principle, whites the feminine, Jews the brutal sadists, whites the adoring masochists. The greater the psychological, emotional, and physical abuse the victims suffer, the more admiring they become. And it is no false adoration.
Whites are demure, available coquettes in the presence of the psychologically commanding Jew.”
Best analysis, as yet.
I think this article is quite mistaken.
Before I became jew aware (only within the last year) I also had a grudging admiration for them when they did some ‘strong’ thing like tracking down and assassinating arab ‘terrorists’. Finally the poor persercuted jews had developed a backbone and were not taking it anymore. In other words it was satisfying that they were fighting fire with even more fire, instead of turning the other cheek.
Now that I have learnt that by and large they are a bunch of pychopaths, intent on destroying us, I have zero admiration for them.
———-
Anti racism is a code word for anti white.
I think Evola’s interpretation still holds.
From what I can gather, the Jew is like that nightmare woman who tricked the handsome, heroic, talented man into marrying her in spite of the warnings. Like Delilah, I guess. She gets him to fight her enemies for her and pay all her bills & debts. She’s taking credit for his achievments. She’s cheating on him constantly, mixing ground glass in his food, & plans for the day when she can get her hands on all his accumulated wealth & reputation for herself. Because he’s so masculine he can not detect that she’s his true enemy because his nature is to suspect & fight other men only, not women who he’s been brought up to respect & protect. The way women network & spread rumours & lies amongst themselves is alien to him. Nor can he imagine a woman, least of all his wife, being as evil as his relatives (& the men he’s been beating up) are telling him she is. It doesn’t help that she gets hysterical every time she’s accused. He’s so outraged that he falls out with everyone. Even when he’s gotten so sick from the ground glass in his stomach & and is on his deathbed he still doesn’t see it.
Paleo-Cons (Derbyshire would be a good example) are like those pathetic, weakling, men out there who know exactly what their horrible, domineering, wives are about but they won’t dare stand up to her.
Interesting article. Can someone here please explain to me or dirt me towards a sensible answer in regards to evangelical Christians and thier live for isreal and Zionism. And thier undying support for Zionism?
I understand that the bible has been perverted so much so by Zionist that the evangelist and Many Christians believe that isreal must be around for the messiah to come. I also understand that many quotes directly from thier canon says things like ” to ally with the Jews is paramount for heaaven.” but can someone shed light as to how zionists have achieved such a great collaboration especially from pragmaticist based, nationionalistic, conservative evalabgovlcals?
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.