1,492 words
Editor’s Note: Below is an an excerpt from an essay I published last June in the run-up to the Twelve Day War. I was planning to republish it today, in the hope that it might encourage people to protest and stop a new war. Obviously, I was too late. The Twelve Day War was mercifully brief, and everyone breathed a sigh of relief. Because of that, Trump (and America) may have dodged some of the worst outcomes I feared. I doubt we will be so lucky this time around. I fear that when future Chinese historians write about the end of the United States, they will say that the nation died because it was hijacked by Jews, who always put Jewish interests ahead of American interests. No nation can survive such policies, and America was barely clinging to life when Trump returned to the White House.
Will there be war? It is hard to say. But in a battle of wills between Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu, I wouldn’t bet anything on Trump. And this brings us to the horrible truth: for many of his followers, everything depends on Trump—a weak, unprincipled, corrupt, egomaniacal Boomer.
Trump really is America’s last chance to halt its slide into a multiracial one-party Leftist dystopia. American democracy is finished. Multiparty democracy means being willing to hand a loaded gun to your political opponents every few years, on the assumption they won’t use it against you.
Ask yourself: Would you hand a loaded gun to any of the freaks, hysterics, and criminal aliens who are marching against Trump’s immigration policies? Would you hand a loaded gun to Hillary Clinton? You’d be an absolute fool.
If the Left get back into power, they will never relinquish it voluntarily. They think we’re too dangerous to have power again. They will ban all opposition then go back to Biden’s policy of opening the borders to push the Great Replacement to the point of no return.
That means an end to America as we know it. Elon Musk and other technological utopians can kiss their dreams goodbye. Favela dwellers, welfare queenz, and potheads are not going to colonize the galaxy. Musk and his buddies will go to jail, not Mars.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s Is America Doomed? here.
What is my red line? What would turn me from a Trump supporter to a Trump opponent? For me, the red line is immigration, not foreign policy. I didn’t drop Trump over his shameful treatment of Ukraine or his sycophancy toward Putin and Netanyahu. I wouldn’t drop him over a war with Iran.
Last year, we had a binary choice between Trump and Harris, and Trump was clearly the better candidate from a pro-white point of view. Both of America’s political parties are Israeli occupied territory. Israel has been agitating for war with Iran for years. Thus we would probably be in pretty much the same situation under a Harris presidency.
The last election was not a referendum on Jewish power. It was largely a referendum on immigration. And on that issue, Trump was clearly the better candidate. If Trump had been worse than Harris on immigration—and honestly, it would have been hard to be worse than Harris—I would not have bothered to vote.
I knew I was voting for Zion Don the Moshiach. But I was hoping to get some closed borders and mass deportations as well.
The most pressing issue of our time is securing America’s borders and halting the Great Replacement. This is more important to me than any foreign policy issue. In fact, immigration is so much more important than foreign policy that it strikes me as irrational to blow up the Trump coalition over Iran.
But most voters are not rational. Even a lot of highly intelligent people don’t actually vote on the choice offered them. They think that voting for the lesser evil is somehow a moral compromise, when in fact it is pretty much the definition of rational behavior. They vote on fantasy tickets, as if the alternative to Trump had been Otto von Bismarck not Kamala Harris. They pretend that if they abstain from politics, someone—their mommy, I guess—will give them better options next time around.
For Trump, the greatest danger are the people who will vote against his agenda out of spite, meaning that they are willing to hurt themselves in order to punish his betrayal. The sight of Trump surrounded by the same neocon vermin who sold us the Iraq War, trotting out the very same lies and hysteria, is the sort of betrayal that activates a spite response. Spiteful men kiss rational self-interest goodbye. They are political wild cards. They can’t be predicted or controlled. They must simply be appeased.
If Trump goes to war with Iran, it will destroy his presidency and any hope of making America great again.
First, war with Iran will shatter the coalition that put Trump in office: many anti-war liberals, centrists, independents, and Rightists who voted for him will defect. In the midterms, they will sit the election out or punish the Republicans by voting Democrat. Congress will swing to the Left, and Trump will be a lame duck. Then it is adios America. The Republicans need to fortify the next elections. War with Iran will have the opposite effect.
Even though opposing immigration is my primary concern, the anti-war people in effect hold Trump’s immigration agenda hostage. Thus we must stop this war.
Second, a war would divert time, energy, and political capital away from the immigration issue. This is another good reason to oppose any war. To halt the Great Replacement, we need to keep the peace.
Third, a war with Iran would be enormously costly—especially when global energy prices spike—and America is already worse than broke.
Fourth, America’s military, and American society at large, are far weaker than in 2003, when the Iraq War began. Iran, moreover, is a far more formidable foe than Iraq. I have no doubt that the United States could defeat Iran. (Imagine being a racist and betting on Iran.) But at what cost?
Even if the United States beats Iran, it will deplete manpower and supplies, leaving the US weaker and with less will to fight vis-à-vis China, which is a far more important foe. Iran is merely Israel’s enemy. China is America’s enemy.
Beyond that, world peace depends upon deterrence, which depends as much upon perceptions as upon reality. For years, most people believed that Russia had the second strongest military in the world. Russia’s inability to defeat Ukraine showed that to be false, emboldening Russia’s enemies. Mere underperformance in Iran would embolden America’s enemies in the same way.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here
Fifth, Israel is deeply and deservedly loathed around the world. America is already too closely tied to Israel. Another war at the behest of Israel will make America even more enemies.
Note that I said nothing about whether this war can be justified in terms of American or global security interests. It can’t, but that’s really beside the point, because justified or not, going to war with Iran would be deadly for Trump, America, and the MAGA agenda.
Fortunately, we are not powerless to stop this. In the long run, ideas determine the course of history. We have the right ideas and priorities, and these are now increasingly mainstream. As with Trump’s immigration betrayals, there has been a great deal of energetic, articulate, principled opposition, including from people who were conservative normies only a few years ago. I was particularly pleased to see Matt Walsh, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, and Marjorie Taylor Green taking strong stands. Public pushback seems to have staved off Trump’s latest immigration betrayal. It could stop a war with Iran.
X is the main vector for mainstreaming our ideas. I am not allowed on X, but I want all of my writers and readers to get X accounts, share my takes, and boost the signals of our most prominent accounts. Don’t be afraid to chimp out a bit. It’s important.
There also needs to be resistance to this war from within Trump’s camp. If Trump’s presidency fails, his family and his biggest backers and advisors face the prospect of losing their fortunes, their freedom, and their dreams once a crazed and vengeful Left returns to power. They need to rein him in.
But what if we fail to prevent a war? Never let a crisis go to waste.
First of all, another catastrophic war for Israel will be highly educational. Millions will awaken to the Jewish problem and the hopeless corruption of our political system.
Second, such a war will surely hasten the end of the American empire, which will give opportunities for whites in America and around the world to create or restore white homelands.
Never forget that Trump may be the last chance for America, but he’s not the last chance for white people.
116 comments
I’ll say this again.
Whatever we think of the domestic agenda of President Donald John Trump and how adequate it was, it doesn’t matter any more. The Great Society of President Lyndon Baines Johnson ended in Vietnam and Make America Great Again is ending in Iran.
There wasn’t a better alternative to vote for or to cheer for, and we only wanted what was right. We have nothing to regret.
This is on the Jews and their puppets. We should hang the Epstein files around their necks forever for this. The Jews have dragged us into war by corrupt and morally filthy means. We should tell young Whites who are forming their political views now to assign the blame accordingly.
Preventing Iran’s Islamist regime from acquiring nuclear weapons is serving the broader international interest, regardless of where one stands in the Israel–Middle East conflict. Regime change in Teheran would also not be the worst thing that could happen. As long as the military operation remains limited and short-term, there is little reason to react as if the sky is falling.
Every stupid policy begins with someone saying “Wouldn’t it be nice . . . ” with nary a thought about the costs. The US simply can’t afford this. Foreigners like you don’t care, for obvious reasons.
That’s your presumption. Few foreigners care about the US as much as I do. Lets see how things unfold.
I specifically said, “as long as the military operation remains limited and short-term,” and I genuinely hope it does. Large-scale wars don’t seem to be Trump’s style, and I believe he will try to avoid one this time as well.
You can choose when to start a war. You can’t choose when to stop them. That requires the consent of the other parties. Thus such assumptions are pretty much meaningless.
When an operation takes place far from home, you can just withdraw once your objectives have been achieved. Iran does not have the capacity to wage a conventional war against the United States, and I find it unlikely that we will see anything resembling a full-scale invasion.
Trump likely hopes that the military actions will weaken the regime from within and create conditions for a popular uprising, rather than attempting to remove it through a large-scale ground war.
The US will remain involved as long as Israel is near Iran. So no, the US does not have the option of just going home, unless we first eject the Zionists from our own society.
You seem to expect the worst possible scenario. I believe we will see a slightly longer version of the 12 day war and that will be it. Time will tell which of us were right.
Israel will for sure continue to have issues with their neighbors and zionist lobby will remain a factor in Washington but that is another conversation.
Serious people consider the worst possible outcomes before acting.
You don’t really believe that this was about Iran’s nuclear problems, do you? The fact is crystal clear. US government puts the interests of Israel ahead of the American people. Greg is right as always.
The nuclear threat is real, even if it is currently a more immediate concern for Israel than for others. That said, it is in everyone’s interest that Iran — and other muslim countries in the region — do not acquire nuclear weapons. Over time, such proliferation could also become a direct security concern for Europe and beyond.
I don’t care about the Paki atomic bomb. So why should I care about the Iranian atomic bomb?
If I had a nuke, I would give it to Iran. If Iran had nukes, this war would not be happening.
Pakistan developed nuclear weapons as a direct deterrent against India in a specific bilateral conflict. Iran, on the other hand, is already deeply involved in regional power struggles, which makes its potential nuclear capability far more destabilizing in the eyes of its neighbors.
If Iran were to acquire nukes, countries like Saudi Arabia or Turkey would likely feel compelled to pursue their own deterrent, triggering a regional arms race. The issue isn’t just Iran – it’s the chain reaction that could follow, which in the long run could also pose a security threat to Europe in any future confrontation involving Muslim Middle Eastern states.
Oh, well by that logic, let’s begin by denuclearizing Israel.
Not realistic. Now the discussion is drifting off into sophistry. I could argue as well that by your logic every country should be given nukes – then noone would ever dare to start a conflict.
My position is simply this: if Trump manages, through a limited operation, to eliminate Iran’s ability to acquire nuclear weapons – and if it possibly even contributes to a regime change – then there is little reason to be upset about it. In fact, it could be seen as a positive development for the wider world.
Moreover, Iranian-supplied drones have played a not unsignificant role in Putin’s war in Ukraine. Even if that was not the motive behind the attack, from our perspective it is hardly a negative thing if an ally of Putin suffers a setback.
Your argument is simply that this war might be nice if there are no downsides. There will be downsides, and none of them are worth it, in my opinion.
Beyond that, justice lies with the Iranians here.
Yes, I much prefer Iran use its drones on Israel and the Gulf States, not export them to Russia. This really is the only bright side of the conflict.
You are credulous at best for believing the official narrative of the administration. How is bombing children’s schools a “deterrent”?! It has nothing to do with nuclear weapons, which, by the way, according to Trump were “obliterated” in the 12-Day War.
Regime Change in Iran should have happened in 1980 after the Islamists took hostages from the U.S. embassy.
President Carter seemed to imagine a world where Pearl Harbor could have been prevented by prevaricating over the fate of a few hundred hostages.
Now it is a day late and few dollars short, and Regime Change with Iran today is dicey at best ─ with Israel and Natanyahoo as the primary beneficiaries.
I agree with Greg’s analysis, 100 percent. If Trump goes to war with Iran, MAGA winds up in the ashcan for good. We might as well hand over the Republic to the Democrats and Leftists who venerate if not deify Illegals far more than American citizens, for obvious reasons.
Trump has already lost the plot by not going after AntiFa after the Charlie Kirk assassination, and not going for the jugular in Minneapolis with ICE and Sanctuary Cities.
Already the pro-Replacement Left are declaring victory and chuckling about letting the Donald think that he won.
🙂
“serving the broader international interest”
That is not the purpose of the US government; its real purpose is to serve US interests. It does not serve US interests to be perceived internationally as a war-addicted bully. Nor does it serve US interests to place ourselves in the role of GloboCop–that will just bleed us dry and anger every other country. The world is advancing technically–are we to attack every country with nuclear capability? Iran is no threat to the US, other than the close US-Israel relationship.
Attacking Iran also does not serve broader international interests. It only serves the narrow interests of Saudi Arabia and especially Israel. And a weaker Israel would be good for US–and European–interests. There’s a whole lot of trouble emanating from that place. So maybe a stronger Iran–and good US-Iran relations–is good for US interests. Enough of these endless Jew wars.
“Enough of these endless Jew wars.”
Amen to that.
100% Correct
Nothing good can come from this. No nation to include Israel will send troops to fight a real war as opposed to shooting Palestinian fish in a barrel. The US will have to deploy on the ground or accomplish nothing. And in the mounting international hate, we have lost all our old coalition partners starting with Danes and NATO members, this will include our Arab friends when their own people threaten their leaders and our leased property for the situation they are now in. Our elite draft dodging war hawks will not send their family members either. Nothing that Trump can do for you can outweigh the present and future damage (regarding every social / economic aspect), or negate the abortion we now call his appointed cabinet officials. This is an unqualified self serving government, now driving the most powerful and potentially destructive or constructive country in the world.
As for two oceans and your sense of security, Frank Nitti proved to Elliot Ness no one is -Untouchable. Nations that desire nuclear will eventually make it or get it. How it is used depends directly on our foreign policy and our very divisive statecraft polity.
I appreciate Trump for shifting the Overton Window and for some of the meaningful victories last year, especially in attacking DEI and closing the border.
I resent Trump for how much political capital was frittered away on the Reaganite DOGE crusade that fell far short of its goals, the complete PR bungling of Epstein that handed that issue to the left, and the continued slavish devotion to Israel and international Jewry. I despise the Republican establishment for doing so little with nominal control over all three branches of government.
The Republicans were already likely to lose badly in the midterms. This will only hurt them with voters. On balance, Jewish donors and opinion drivers will not return the love here, as always.
Well Greg… Here we go again.
Be prepared for an upsurge in islamic terrorist attacks here in America, and all western nations. 🙃
Also be prepared for Mossad’s many false flag operations.
Dangerously demented Donald Trump, sometimes referred to by breathless newscasters as “the-most-powerful-man-in-the-world,” is nothing more than Benjamin Netanyahu’s obedient attack dog. I doubt that Vladimir Putin actually possess photographs or videos of Trump doing disgusting, perverted, unspeakable acts, but if he does have such items I hope he releases them and they are spread far and wide. That would be horribly embarrassing for America but might save us additional grief in the long run. Sometimes you have to know how dirty things are before you can clean them up.
Trump has once again brought disgrace on everything, dancing to what Israel wants at any cost.
I had suspected, although a lot of the usual talking heads were 50/50, that these negotiations were a sham anyway to get forces in place and ready to roll. And Trump did this before. He talks the language of diplomacy (albeit with impossible and unreasonable demands), only to drop bombs on the same people as he’s doing so. It’s vile behavior. No country in the world should trust the US over anything and every country has to have nuclear weapons if they want to be free of the US jackboot.
It’s all openly admitted this is all orchestrated with Israel and has been in planning for months. Trump’s another tool. Another idiot like Bush, but probably worse than Bush, he’s far more pro-active. (Side note: Can anyone find that brilliant cartoon of Bush as the falcon on the Jew’s arm? It was around for years and then vanished.)
There’s no moral component to this. Special little Israel with its special little people feels entitled to be surrounded by countries bombed to rubble and set back to the stone age. It thinks this is its right.
The Jewish lobby has corrupted US politics, actually Western politics, to a point that’s ridiculous. It’s a like a parasitic alien with its tendrils going into the host brain. I’m quite happy to have healthy ‘antisemitism’, to have ‘hate’, to have discrimination, instead of these wars. It’s no-brainer trade.
“The Jewish lobby has corrupted US politics, actually Western politics, to a point that’s ridiculous. It’s a like a parasitic alien with its tendrils going into the host brain.”
Yes it is. Jewish power is parasitic and hostile.
We have to tell young Americans clearly and often that this war is not happening because White nationalists wanted it or because right wingers wanted it but because the Jews wanted it, because the Zionists wanted it, and because they used corruption and the filthy means revealed in the Epstein files to subvert the American government and get their way.
We are going to be called anti-Semitic for saying this. Good. Let the political battle lines be drawn.
Right, bring it on. Bombing Iran is nothing to do with white nationalism or white interests. It’s not even conservative in any serious, historical sense of the term.
It’s Jewish power gripping our leaders by the hairs on their head as Churchill said; becoming practically the “undisputed masters of this enormous empire.”
You can have a choice of course:
You’re allowed to vote for anti-whiteism, endless immigration, diversity, trannyism
or,
You can have perpetual war against Israel’s enemies and some level of non-advancement or even domestic pull back on the other issues.
But you can’t have both. You can have Zionism or Bolshevism.
And it looks very much like with Trump, the more aggressive the pullback on one, the further you have to go on the other. So there’s no net change in Jews getting something they want.
The entire political system has got rigged this way. It’s etched into the firmware now, that politicians have to be running around groveling to Jews and Israel and implementing any wars they want, or cracking down on whites domestically. They can’t explain why they are doing it. They’re just doing it. “Values”,”democracy”. The parasite has turned them into zombies.
And there’s important implications in this, it means they are not/were never fit to serve in office. They are so zombiefied, they will start wars on behalf of the parasite.
That reminds me of something from Yockey if I remember right, something about the “Asiatic” diplomacy of Bolshevist Russia, its kidnappings and assassinations, and whether the West could learn to be equally devoid of scruples.
Well, insofar as the U.S. is fit to represent the West, that certainly seems to be now the case; it’s difficult to think of something more treacherous or “Asiatic” than attacking the people you yourself invited for negotiations, like some kind of villainous barbarians in a schlocky fantasy film. Where can you even go from here? Perhaps they could abduct the family members of enemy leaders and livestream their tortures (let’s not give them ideas).
But, then again, I think it would be out of place, even sentimental to criticize such undoubtedly contemptible methods, springing presumably out of a somewhat understandable “winning-at-all-costs” impulse, if, one day, they were actually deployed for a pro-White purpose, which of course is not the case here.
War is the realm of Chaos – ancient military wisdom.
It just may be that limited airstrikes will lead to regime change in Iran, and with that bring an end to Iranian support for anti-Western operations in the Persian Gulf and beyond. Maybe.
But does the United States have the wherewithal to fight what could be a protracted conflict in the Persian Gulf? After all, the federal government does not even control the streets of cities like Minneapolis. What makes anyone think that control can be gained in downtown Tehran or Qom? One might point out that the collapse of homefront morale during the Indochina, Algerian, and Vietnam Wars, as well as the pulling the rug out from under the Rhodesians, led to de facto military defeat in the field for Western forces.
The 2001-2003 US interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq were predicated in the mass rally of public opinion behind the government caused by the attacks of 9/11. Remember the NYC firefighter and police badges which US forces scattered about Afghanistan? Is a New York City under its current regime going to stand tall in a fight against an Islamic state?
There’s also the condition of the US military. In 2001, American armed forces were at a peak of combat power. They deployed the cutting edge technologies of the Revolution in Military Affairs as well as such doctrines as the Army of Excellence. There was also the morale boost from the successful Desert Storm campaign of a decade prior. These paid off in the Coalition’s rapid initial victories, routing the Taliban in Afghanistan and then seizing Baghdad. All this was dissipated by two decades of counterinsurgency which culminated in the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in August 2021.
Today’s military has been debilitated by years of DEI policies. And yes, President Trump has officially banned DEI at the Pentagon. But like good guerrillas, the DEI commissars have retreated to their sanctuaries, changing the names (but not the functions) of their offices or falling back on Beltway bandit enclaves. And they will be waiting for the opportunity to return – say, a egregious military failure by US forces, or a war that drags out over a span of years
There’s only one way to find out if the Department of War can fight and win, and that is the test of combat. And alas, we may see this play out in the coming weeks in the Persian Gulf.
Another piece of ancient military wisdom – Dig ’em deeper, lads!
“Therefore if you do not compete for alliances anywhere, do not foster authority anywhere (and everywhere), but just extend your (disastrous) personal influence, threaten opponents, this makes town and country vulnerable” — Sun Tzu, “The Art Of War”.
Excellent breakdown as per usual
Greg Johnson: “You can choose when to start a war. You can’t choose when to stop them. That requires the consent of the other parties.” Yes, but you can force the consent of the other parties, if you know what I mean.
Yeah, well, that means that you have to assume that you will win. If your planning depends entirely on winning, that’s bad planning.
I think Greg makes a great point about how it’s easy to start wars, not so easy to end them. I reckon that was why perhaps the US opted not to bomb the emperor of Japan. The optics of their leader surrendering speaks volumes. We no longer have that if, assuming the reports are true, Khamenei is dead.
I’m not a big fan of Iran but this just comes off as Trump being Netanyahu’s buttgoy. There are so many domestic problems in the US that I don’t think Trump can manage with a Mideast war to boot. Frankly, he would have been better off stationing the armada in Lake Ontario and threatening Mayor Frey and Governor Walz.
This war might be bad for Israel. If the US military runs out of ammo as some have said is likely, then Iran’s ballistic missiles that get through the dome will cause damage.
As for “future Chinese historians”, this clash of civilizations is just getting started and I am not betting on the Middle Kingdom.
“For Trump, the greatest danger are the people who will vote against his agenda out of spite, meaning that they are willing to hurt themselves in order to punish his betrayal. The sight of Trump surrounded by the same neocon vermin who sold us the Iraq War, trotting out the very same lies and hysteria, is the sort of betrayal that activates a spite response. Spiteful men kiss rational self-interest goodbye. They are political wild cards. They can’t be predicted or controlled. They must simply be appeased.”
That’s right. And President Trump has done what it takes to activate that spite response.
We have no choice but to try to channel that inevitable response as best we can, away from White nationalists and sundry right-wingers who didn’t want this war, and toward the truly guilty parties.
Young White Americans will have to survive and thrive in a hostile environment. They won’t be able to do it by blaming their friends and giving their enemies a pass. Young White Americans have to interpret their situation correctly and we have to help them.
Iran does not have to win, they just have to keep from losing. Just like Vietnam, they can stretch out this war for years, making it a “money pit,” progressively destabilizing the region. 🙃
It will depend on China’s position. If Comrade Xi will support Iran, Iran could fight for a long time.
I just listened to the Greg-David discussion.
I agree with the major points.
I don’t understand the point made about the Fellaheen.
It’s been about forty years since I cracked open Spengler, but the Fellahin are the Egyptian peasant class, so I believe that Spengler was giving a critique of populism in that a jumped-up camel jockey class is not a “based” political elite.
In spite of the admiration that Thomas Jefferson might have had for the virtues of the “yeoman farmer,” the joke is that the heartland bourgeoisie are still just rubes and contrarians at heart. This describes Trump in a way, although his political sense is much better than it was in his first term.
Also, the idea that with the passing of the Baby Boomers, a Renaissance will spring forth, is masturbatory delusion at its best.
I’m old enough to remember a lot of generations from the octogenarian World War I veteran who visited my Government class in High School in 1979 fitted sharply in his old Doughboy uniform, who still believed that fighting the Kaiser would “make the world safe for Democracy,” as promised.
My experience ─ most of it predating the Internet ─ says that the only generations worst than the last are the ones next.
Also, the idea that this will involve some sort of “generational wealth transfer” is delusional as well. Just visit a nursing home some time. These old-timers were bilked of their life’s savings after a year or two of their care, and some of them are strong enough that they could still hang on for five or ten more years.
My own Dad is pushing 90 and in the beginning stages of dementia. Once he designed reliable solid-rocket boosters for the 1961 Minuteman ICBM missile, and studied systems problems like the 1979 Three Mile Island nuclear meltdown and the 1986 Space Shuttle explosion. He made a pretty good engineering income, an “aristocracy of labor,” I guess.
Now we are wondering how we will pay for future nursing home care because it is becoming too much for my sister to handle. He could still live for another ten years and my Mom isn’t doing much better.
I do agree that the GOP are scum, but they are at least our scum. The Democrats are the Marxist enemy and they cannot be accomodated.
Last point. The Epstein matter was bungled by Trump, but this will not lead to any fresh air on the JQ. You either “noticed” years ago or you did not.
I don’t think anybody is going to gin up any actionable prosecutorial evidence now. (No, I don’t like Pedos any more than you do.)
Some ditzy journo asked Hillary Clinton recently why Ghislaine Maxwell was at daughter Chelsea’s wedding if she really had no ties to Epstein.
Well, obviously, because Chelsea married a member of the Israelite Tribe.
🙂
These old-timers were bilked of their life’s savings after a year or two of their care, and some of them are strong enough that they could still hang on for five or ten more years.
They could survive 5-10 years if they were left alone as regards medical treatment (excluding emergency treatment for broken bones, “accidents”, etc.). However, if they are in a nursing home, they’ll be regularly given poison in the form of the standard-issue flu shot and if they really have a death wish will take the corona 19 killshot, too.
Old people decrepit enough to be in a nursing home no longer have the strength to withstand the vaccine ingredients when injected directly into the bloodstream. Apparently, from what I hear anyway, after a whole bunch of old folks get their flu shot at the same time in a hospital or other facility, there is an increase in death from flu or they just decided to die (without getting vaccine-induced flu) because the poisons pushed them over the edge.
Really sick old people in hospitals and homes are sitting ducks for those who think the western world is overpopulated and underfunded, and that these “useless eaters” are the major problem. The staff find all kinds of ways to launch these old folks into Eternity. Sorry, Scott, about your family.
Iran and the Iraians deseve no sympahy, because they have none for us.
In situations like this, we must look to our own intersests. This war is not in the interests of Americans or white Americans. It is in the interest of Israel and certain Jews. It has to be opposed on that basis only.
Iran is a beautiful country, and Iranians are nice and friendly people. Ayatollahs in Qom, Pasdaran, Basiji, etc., do not represent the interests of majority of Iranian peoples.
This kind of thinking (which I share myself) shows misdirected white empathy in action, bleeding over even among people here; unrecipocated empathy hits deep wiring in whites, and our enemies exploit it to the max.
it’s one reason Jews and their white gentile fellow travelers have gone back to the well with that hoary propaganda line “The poor Iranians just want freedom.” It’s a twist on the immigrant just wants a better life, welcome the stanger, and so on. Stop caring.
Can you imagine dissident Iranians telling each other “you know the US and England are beautiful places with rich histories. It’s really is too bad about those rape gangs and Jews leading the US from 90% to 55% white in a few years and still headed down.”
Iranians are White. And they are Aryans per se. It is one of the most ancient civilizations in the world history. The Iranian culture is much older than Islam, and even the Islam was imposed on Persians forcefully and brutally.
First two points wrong, last three right.
Only 6% of the average Iranian’s DNA falls into a DNA cluster that made up 55% of the DNA of the historical Aryans, meaning that modern Iranians are only about 11% Aryan. Then there’s maybe 1% Mediterranean DNA. The remaining ca. 88% are far Middle-Eastern i.e. definitely not White.
Sources:
https://eupedia.com/genetics/genomic_analysis_ancient_europeans.shtml
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GWhNZcfTQ2hMSK9Ni1IqG7aXHB00SRE5L6ED2osPs9M/edit?gid=0#gid=0
Stop overreacting. You sound like some hysterical ninny. This is going to be nothing more than a repeat of the 12 day war. They’ll blow up a few buildings and be done. And no, the five-o party (negro/latino/judeo/homo/psycho) will not win the midterms. Stop the predictive programming.
Stop coping. Trump is blowing it.
Where are the best places online to get up to date unbiased accurate information on what is going on? Which X / Telegram channels / Websites / etc?
Nowhere at this stage. When the war is at its hottest, the information flow remains highly manipulated and leaves too much to pure speculation. For example, only recently we’ve been learning more about the early episodes of the Ukrainian War like the Hostomel landings or what happened during preparations of the ill-fated counter-offensive.
I much prefer Iran use its drones on Israel and the Gulf States, not export them to Russia.
Russia produces its own drones in thousands, yes, they are based on Iranian design, but the Russians do not need import UAVs from Iran anymore.
This is originally not an Iranian design, this is an Israeli design.
Remember that odd confession from Trumpstein a while back when he pondered an afterlife in eternal hell? I guess we now have more context; the timetable for Iran was immutable and even back then he knew then the course he’d take. No brakes!
In hindsight, the death of ‘Win Bigly’ author Scott Adams in January, someone who literally sacrificed his life for his MAGA/Warp Speed zealotry was a symbolic omen.
Owen Shroyer’s been on fire lately, freed from the infowars yoke, his most recent stream on this terrible day no exception.
Totally agree
Israel is eliminating Iran with help of Trump who will probably be arrested after mid- term elections. Theu are using a bad White guy to do dirty work and replace him later. Bonus if Europe gets all kinds of Iranian refugees as result of conflict inside of destroyed country like it happened in Iraq. Shame of this clown’s actions fall on all Whites like it or not. I also feel cringe about his daughter who married Kushner and has kids with him ( doing dirty work is in the family ). As a White woman I feel ashamed and disgusted she is one of us too.
“They vote on fantasy tickets, as if the alternative to Trump had been Otto von Bismarck not Kamala Harris. They pretend that if they abstain from politics, someone—their mommy, I guess—will give them better options next time around.”
You say that voting for the lesser evil is rational, and disparage abstaining from electoral politics as an ineffective strategy. Then, in the next paragraph, you describe ‘people who will vote against his agenda out of spite’ as unpredictable men who must be appeased.
You have admitted that voting against one’s immediate interests has political power, in contrast with your stated belief.
During the last UK election, you encouraged people to not vote for the Conservatives, as part of the zero seats campaign. The strategy was that the party was traitorous and needed to be destroyed to allow space for a real alternative. That strategy was harmful to the immediate interests of British people, as Labour were known to be more anti-White than the Conservatives (and this was shown in their handling of the Southport riots), but beneficial in the longer term as it would encourage Reform, and now Restore, to become established.
I think that this strategy is potentially applicable in your country. Sometimes not voting for the lesser evil is the rational option as it prioritises longer term interests over short ones.
At the end of your essay you differentiate between American and White interests. I suspect that the Trump administration has consolidated power for America as a multi-ethnic empire and extended her lifespan as such, when what needs to happen is her dissolution, so that a real alternative for the White peoples of the North American continent can develop. I think that when you angrily wrote that everyone should vote for the coloured woman as gay space communism was inherently unstable, that your instinct there was correct.
Yes, it is rational not to follow rational self-interest when you are ruled by people who will exploit that.
As of this post, three Americans are confirmed dead. Zero Jews are dead.
As of this morning, Sunday, 1 March, it is reported that a negligible nine Americans have been killed in the back-and-forth aerial attacks between Iran and Israel/America.
Big deal. This morning, Israel/America murdered Ayatollah Khamenei. FLASH!!:
Iranian state media reported the death early Sunday of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei after a major attack launched by Israel and the United States.
Aside from “our” murder of Iran’s long-time leader and other Iranian leaders today, the news that grabbed me this is the American/Israeli murder of 128 young Iranian school girls (up from first estimate of 51) and the wounding of scores more yesterday when “we” bombed their elementary school. The U.S. deserves all the retaliation it will get from Israel’s many enemies for killing Iran’s leaders and school children in this latest bullshit from the “most Jewish non-Jew,” self-styled “peace president.”
Where’s the proportionality from “our” Jew-controlled media? It’s like the month-long news cycle bullshit on the electronic Jew about Savannah Feldman’s missing mother compared to the 81st anniversary of the 100,000 German civilians murdered by us and the Brits in the real Valentine’s Day Massacre in Dresden at the end of WWII.
—
Former CC Regular: March 1, 2026 As of this post, three Americans are confirmed dead. Zero Jews are dead.
—
The Child Murder Begins: US and Israeli attack on Iran – At least 51 girls reported killed in strike on school – THE INTEL DROP
Dozens of children aged between seven and 12 hit in attack on Minab city
Video posted on pro-government Telegram accounts show Iranians searching through the destroyed school in Minab (Telegram)
By MEE correspondent in Tehran
28 February 2026
At least 51 girls have been killed in an air strike on an elementary school in southern Iran, local authorities said, as the United States and Israel ramps up attacks on the country.
The attack on Saturday morning hit Shajareh Tayyebeh school in Minab city in the southern Hormozgan province. The victims were between seven and 12 years old, according to Iran’s Tasnim and Fars news agencies.
The air strike on the school caused many of those inside the building to become trapped under the rubble.
There were 170 female students at the school at the time of the attack. So far, at least 45 people have also been reported wounded.
“During the Israeli missile attack this morning (Saturday) on a girls’ primary school in Minab County, 51 students have so far been killed and 60 students have been wounded,” the county governor said, according to state media….
.
This.
If you look at the entire Western mainstream media, there’s no condemnation at all about this attack on Iran in any dimension. There’s actually advocacy of it, but headlined to look like criticism, in the NYT, where the ‘criticism’ is that Trump hasn’t hasn’t positioned himself to do this properly, and that he said the last operation ‘obliterated Iran’s nuclear production’ when it only set it back a bit. That’s their criticism.
Surreal.
Although Reza Pahlavi followed the Trump pattern of marrying into jewish bloodlines, he’s probably going to be far from a hapless puppet. Iran is simply too big and too proud (with the bicentennial period of Russo-British humiliation in memory) to turn into Syria-redux. Then there’s the memory of what (and who) did his father in and elevated Khomeini to power. New Iran, if it comes into being, will have to grow nationalistic to legitimize the new power and check Turkey’s expansion in the region. Incidentally, this nationalism is being raised by various Shah-skeptic articles as it was the Pahlavi dynasty that began the policies of Iranian nationalism, starting with the re-naming of Persia into Iran. I don’t know how the US-Israel want to handle the regime change, but it’s clear that the half-measures won’t work here. The same protesters that cheered for the Shah will agitate for radical policies. Perhaps this is why the usual suspects waited until they are sufficiently pacified by the Basij.
The best option would be nationalistic and progressive military dictatorship in Kemalist style. But a) I do not know if there is a potential Atatuerk in Iran, and b) Ira is very multiethnical, so we can expect internal strifes, when Azerbaycaners, Kurds, Arabs and anothers begin their struggle for national independence against Persians and against each others.
a) Tehran has been traditionally francophillic so the secular politician à la Atatürk could perhaps emerge there
b) This might be what Israel is ultimately aiming for, not the regime change. Apparently the American ground invasion is not going to take place so Iran could be targeted for infrastructure collapse and ethnic irredentism from the neighbors.
Until 1942 (Anglo-Soviet occupation) the Shah was moderately pro-German.
Although they may have coined the term, but the notion of Nationalism doesn’t come from the West. Iran with its ancient civilisation has obviously had the sentiment since yesteryear.
Greg, you went from previously writing about Epstein saying you support the chaos in hopes that the whole system comes crashing down. Trump would be taken down with it because he’s clearly implicated. This could lead to midterm losses and a Dem or RINO prez in 2028, this ending maga deportation policies.
Then you write how war’s OK and not your “red line” because Trump is still better on immigration than Democrats. Immigration is your no. 1 issue and you want maga immigration to keep going.
Wtf? I think your’re confused on whether taking down Jewish power, or immigration, is your no. 1 priority.
By the way, we’re not getting mass deportations and self-deportation numbers are fake and based on voluntary surveys.
I didn’t vote for Trump to be anti-Jew, since that was never in the cards. I voted for him because I hoped we would get our border back and mass deportations. Sadly, we won’t end up with anything because this dumb goy traitor is destroying his presidency. It was always a long shot, but Trump could have saved America. Sadly, he has other priorities.
Yes, it is a great opportunity to expose Jewish power and corruption. But I don’t get much pleasure from being right while everything goes to hell. I’d much prefer to see Trump’s gains extended and secured.
Instead, every good thing he has done will be reversed, and he will be discarded once he trashes Iran for the bloodthirsty Bronze Age cultists who are giving this country one last squeeze before their power here is over.
All the things we hoped to get by sticking with Trump were good things to want, and we were right to trust some leaders to stick to what they said. Marjorie Taylor Greene did stick to what Trump said and what she said. That could have been Trump too.
Greg Johnson: March 2, 2026 I didn’t vote for Trump to be anti-Jew, since that was never in the cards. I voted for him because I hoped we would get our border back and mass deportations. Sadly, we won’t end up with anything because this dumb goy traitor is destroying his presidency… Sadly, he has other priorities.
—
We’ve all clearly seen Trump’s priority during the past few days; it ain’t immigration reform. No one voted for him to be ant-Jew because he isn’t and never will be.
Your disappointment in Trump for his half-baked deportation of non-White illegals while welcoming in hundreds of thousands more (like Chinese students) is not unique for a politician.
I received this news, written by failed British nationalist politician Nick Griffin:
Foreign Wars and Mass Immigration –
Trump and Meloni Mock Their Voters
Nick Griffin
Mar 3 2026
With the first body bags already on their way home, and threats to send even more US personnel into harm’s way, Donald Trump’s betrayal of his most important election pledge is as complete as it is devastating to the millions who once trusted him.
But this is nothing unusual. Promising what voters want to hear, but then delivering what powerful and wealthy vested interests want to happen, is not some shocking aberration – it’s just what populists do. It’s such an established ‘thing’ that, to be blunt, the fault lies not so much with the leaders who lie, as with those who believe their lies in the first place.
The thing to grasp is that Trump is not alone in his deceit and his treachery to his base. While all eyes are on the US President’s despicable but all-too predictable blitz on Iran, one of his favourite European leaders is betraying her core voters with an equally cynical and destructive stab in the back.
The guilty party is Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, and her shocking abandonment of her anti-immigration pledge should serve as a warning to British voters tempted to believe the rhetoric and promises being made by her friend and admirer [pantywaist politician] Nigel Farage.
Meloni, a youthful fascist activist turned ambitious ‘right-wing’ politician, was elected by Italians desperately worried about the growing impact of mass immigration on their country, jobs and security. She played on those fears ruthlessly, talking tough to give voters the impression that she would stop the influx, and even reverse it.
The moment she was elected, however, Meloni turned her coat. She shifted from righteous indignation against the EU’s permissive immigration policies, to becoming a collaborator. Worst of all, even as she made a show of cutting the number of immigrants entering Italy illegally, she opened the floodgates to an unprecedented wave of ‘legal’ immigration.
https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com
Trump being the most pro-Israel prez of our lifetime and going to war for Israel isn’t your “red line” to make you oppose Trump because Trump’s immigration policies are good. Really?
Trump is all talk on immigration and no action. Only 4K deported in MN before Trump retreats. H1-B is stronger than ever. 600K Chinese students are pouring in. And self-deportation numbers are extremely exaggerated.
You have to eventually come to the realization that mass deportations aren’t happening. Then maybe you’ll realize that the root of the problem and question whether you’re really OK with Trump going to war for Israel.
I don’t platform people who spread wignat and Fuentard disinformation about Trump’s immigration policies.
Greg Johnson, to D: March 2, 2026 , I don’t platform people who spread wignat and Fuentard disinformation about Trump’s immigration policies.
—
I have no idea who “D” is, but it seems unfair to me that you will threaten to deplatform him because he apparently puts “taking down Jewish power” as priority 1 ahead of Trump’s half-baked mass deportion of illegal, mostly non-White, invaders. I agree with D’s priorities. Expose Trump’s Shabbos goyism while exposing and taking down Jewish power, then racially responsible Whites, with strong, determined leaders, are likely to deal with millions of invasive non-Whites into their living space as they should.
I understand what a Fuentard is — an infantile “far right,” or “alt-right” Groyper frog — but I had to look up what a wignat is. Found this at X-owner Elon Musk’s Grokipedia (that I don’t trust any more than I do WikiJews):
Wignat is a pejorative slang term, abbreviating “wigger nationalist,” that emerged in the late 2010s within the English-speaking online far-right communities to deride white [sic] nationalists perceived as crude, low-class, and overly explicit in neo-Nazi sympathies, traits seen as undermining the movement’s potential for mainstream appeal on platforms like 4chan…as the alt-right experienced internal fragmentation and debates over ideological purity and public presentation. “Wignat” is a portmanteau blending “wigger,” a slang term for white [sic] people who emulate urban Black cultural elements such as mannerisms, language, and fashion, with “nationalist” to specify white [sic] nationalist ideology. [3][4] This construction targets white [sic] nationalists viewed as crudely adopting lowbrow traits, often marked by overt Nazi sympathies that prioritize shock value over strategic appeal. [4] The derogatory connotation underscores their perceived lack of presentability, portraying them as counterproductive to the movement’s mainstream viability by contrasting with more refined far-right archetypes.
Ha!
Hasn’t Elon banned you from his X platform? His Grokipedia’s footnote [4] leads to your 2020 C-C essay Wignat Whexit: Why “Punishing” the Republicans Won’t Change Them You concluded that with “Don’t be a chump. Vote Trump.”
Positions change. Your position, advising followers to vote for Trump, seems to have changed since then. Maybe your priority will evolve to putting the taking down of Jewish power over the issue of immigration reform. I hope so.
Trump’s blustery war against the sovereign nation of Iran is turning many more Americans than before against their support for Israel. If Americans knew about the stranglehold Jewry has over their mass mind through their control of the news and entertainment industry, they may well turn on Jewry, not just Jewry’s shitty little nation: Read and digest this: Who Rules America 2010
Groypers can call me a wignat. I really don’t give a shit what they or Fuentards or others in the failed alt-right have to say. I appreciate the race preservation and anti-Jew lessons of National Socialism, no matter what the Judaized “mainstream” herd thinks.
Anyone listen to Tucker’s recent interview of Catherine Fitts? She states this military operation is not about nukes but instead is linked to the creation of a control grid. ALL central banks need to get on board to do programmable money and that digital IDs have to be inoperable globally. Iran and the BRICS are “sticking points”. Banks are known to be behind a lot of wars (obviously).
I don’t buy that for a second.
A while ago, Ms Fitts was on a podcast where she “revealed that interdimensional beings are pulling the strings in this world”.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1928314325942296576/vid/avc1/1920×1080/r4ZP_e-idiCcva-A.mp4
While the revelations about Epstein & Co do certainly make the Western elites seem unnaturally evil, Ms Fitts seems to be too uncritical and undiscerning regarding alternative information (hence the use of Nick Redfern’s “Final Events” as a source – I could talk a lot about Redfern, but let’s summarize that with the statement that he’s a conspiratard), so even if her metaphysics are fundamentally correct, her scenario on how the (Western) world is run and who is fighting whom and why, is most likely not correct.
The global Central Banking theory is an older conspiracy narrative, more grounded and less schizo than theories which arose in the Alex Jones era. However, it’s an exaggeration (as if Central Banking was the only thing overt and covert politics was about!) and applying it to the current conflict seems like a “If all you have is a hammer …”-situation.
Controlling a nation’s central bank is certainly important, but controlling its natural ressources, its media, its government, its stock exchange, its universities etc is equally important, and power in each domain can be used to expand your power in the other domains i.e. central bank control is, as far as I can see, not the ultimate “key” to controlling a country (belief systems/supermyths are, in my opinion).
Note that other, competing conspiracy narratives put Secret Societies or intelligence agencies in that position instead, arguing for example that “The Freemasons” rule the Western world, or that the CIA rules America. In my experience, the conspiracy fans who say “It’s the CIA” are the most Anti-American, while the ones that say “It’s the Masons” are the most schizo. The ones saying “It’s the Central Banks” are generally better than the other two.
I remember years ago the Coast to Coast radio show would have her on as a guest from time to time which was mildly entertaining. Tucker seems to take her seriously at this point in his journey. While he does seem kooky at times, he is open to hearing different views and he favours free speech. He has helped people realize that no nation–including Israel–is beyond criticism. Plus, he had Peter Brimelow on!
And where do the people who say it is the jews fall in? I guess that they would fall under the “central bank” conspiracy. 🙃
Peter Quint: March 2, 2026 And where do the people who say it is the jews fall in? I guess that they would fall under the “central bank” conspiracy.
—
I just learned that stupid people call us “wignats.” ;o}
You’ll like this, Peter:
—
Only Three Countries Left Without a ROTHSCHILD Central Bank!
John Morse January 30, 2017
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
[…]
Rothschilds Want Iran’s Banks
Could gaining control of the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (CBI) be one of the main reasons that Iran is being targeted by Western and Israeli powers? As Teensions are building up for an unthinkable war with Iran, it is worth exploring Iran’s banking system compared to its U.S., British and Israeli counterparts.
Source: linkedin.com
Some researchers are pointing out that Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.
Islam forbids the charging of interest, a major problem for the Rothschild banking system. Until a few hundred years ago, charging interest was also forbidden in the Christian world and was even punishable by death. It was considered exploitation and enslavement.
Since the Rothschilds took over the Bank of England around 1815, they have been expanding their banking control over all the countries of the world. Their method has been to get a country’s corrupt politicians to accept massive loans, which they can never repay, and thus go into debt to the Rothschild banking powers. If a leader refuses to accept the loan, he is oftentimes either ousted or assassinated. And if that fails, invasions can follow, and a Rothschild usury-based bank is established.
The Rothschilds exert powerful influence over the world’s major news agencies. By repetition, the masses are duped into believing horror stories about evil villains. The Rothschilds control the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the IMF, the World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements. Also they own most of the gold in the world as well as the London Gold Exchange, which sets the price of gold every day. It is said the family owns over half the wealth of the planet—estimated by Credit Suisse to be $231 trillion—and is controlled by Evelyn Rothschild, the current head of the family.
Objective researchers contend that Iran is not being demonized because they are a nuclear threat, just as the Taliban, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Qadaffi were not a threat.
What then is the real reason? Is it the trillions to be made in oil profits, or the trillions in war profits? Is it to bankrupt the U.S. economy, or is it to start World War III? Is it to destroy Israel’s enemies, or to destroy the Iranian central bank so that no one is left to defy Rothschild’s money racket?
It might be any one of those reasons or, worse—it might be all of them.
Peter Papaherakles, a U.S. citizen since 1986, was born in Greece. He is AFP’s outreach director. If you would like to see AFP speakers at your rally, contact Pete at 202-544-5977.
Source: Only Three Countries Left Without a ROTHSCHILD Central Bank! – The Event Chronicle
AFP, American Free Press?
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Jee-zuz! It’s worse that I thought; thanks for the information, Will.
Banking and Oil ties;
“The US/Israeli Attack Was to Prevent Peace Not Advance It.” That’s the headline of a new article in CounterPunch by the economist Michael Hudson, who details how President Trump opted to attack Iran despite progress made during last week’s U.S.-Iran negotiations in Geneva. In the piece, Hudson writes about the significance of these comments by Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi, who appeared on CBS’s Face the Nation Friday, one day before the U.S. attack.
BADR ALBUSAIDI: If the ultimate objective is to ensure forever that Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, I think we have cracked that problem through these negotiations by agreeing a very important breakthrough that has never been achieved anytime before.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re joined now by the economist Michael Hudson, president of the Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends, distinguished research professor of economics at University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Thanks so much for being with us, Michael. I mean, it seems that the Oman foreign minister flew to Washington so he could directly address this issue, saying more progress had been made and that the deal was going to be one better than Obama’s. He didn’t trust President Trump’s envoys, Jared Kushner and as well as — he didn’t trust Kushner to convey the level of progress that had been made, so he spoke directly himself to the American people through the U.S. press. Your response?
MICHAEL HUDSON: The fact that progress was being made, and that Iran negotiators had agreed not to only — not to have an atom bomb, but to reduce their refined uranium, to shift the refined uranium outside of the country, and to submit to an unprecedented degree of oversight, made it urgent that the United States attack Iran immediately, because what happened was that after the Iranian negotiators went back to Iran, Khamenei and his religious leaders and the military leaders sat down to have a meeting to draft their reply accepting the U.S. demands.
But none of this was about an atom bomb to begin with. The whole reason that America has attacked Iran has nothing to do with its getting an atom bomb, because it wasn’t getting an atom bomb. The aim was to control Near Eastern oil by the United States. And General Petraeus, years ago, had outlined this whole plan in saying, “Well, we’re going to conquer seven Near Eastern countries, culminating in Iran.” Well, actually, the plans go way back to 1974, when OPEC quadrupled the prices, and the United States said, “Well, you can quadruple the prices, but we need to control the world’s oil trade, because oil is a chokepoint. Every country needs oil for its industry, for its transportation, for its electricity, to heat the home. And if we can control the world’s oil trade, then we can use that as an arm of U.S. diplomacy. And we don’t have to own the oil. We don’t have to overthrow the OPEC countries like we did the Iranian government in 1953 when they wanted to nationalize oil. You OPEC countries can nationalize your oil. You can take control of Aramco and the other countries. But you have to make an agreement that all of your profits and rents from the oil will be lent back to the United States, recycled in the United States, priced in dollars and invested in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. bonds and U.S. stocks, so that the money, the vast dollar inflows from your oil exports, will all be part of the U.S. economy.”
I sat in on meetings in the White House in 1974 when this was discussed, because I had been the specialist at Chase Manhattan for the U.S. balance of payments and specifically for the oil industry. And from the very beginning, the U.S. foreign policy was based on if we can control the world’s oil trade, then we really have control of the world’s economy. But in order to do this, we have to prevent other countries from buying oil from countries not controlled by the United States — first by Iran after the shah was overthrown; then you can’t let them buy from Russia after 2022, so you had the sanctions against Russia and the destruction of the oil pipeline; then the sanctions against Venezuela to prevent countries from buying from Venezuela; and now back to Iran to prevent Iran from selling its oil to China. Eighty percent of Iran’s oil exports had gone to China.
So, the whole idea from the beginning was to consolidate the U.S. ability to control oil, and thereby to give Trump and the U.S. administration the ability to turn off the lights, to turn off the power, to turn off the electricity to other countries if they did not agree to follow U.S. foreign policy, to maintain sanctions against other oil countries, against Russia, China also and Iran.
Strictly speaking, neither. An ethnic mafia as the center of a conspiracy is a fourth category besides secret societies, intelligence agencies and banking cartels. If elites cooperate because of their ethnic & religious ties to one another, then there’s no need for a particular organization like the Freemasons or the CIA or the FED. But you’re right that said fourth category is most closely related to the central banking narrative (for obvious historical reasons).
Typo: interoperable, not inoperable
Let’s take it step by step. Russia doesn’t need oil, they bought the license from Iran and they can manufacture Shahed drones in Russia. Also they are quite OK with an increase of the price of oil in order to save their own economy. China has a monopoly on rare metals worldwide, they’ve been working on that for over 30 years. Both Venezuela and Iran were major energy suppliers (oil) for China. If the Americans gain control over these countries (democracy is not an issue, just control), it’s a major strategic move. Don’t think that’s not important from the white nationalist perspective. If China dominates the world in the future, that will affect America, even related to internal policies. Remember, after WW2 the dominance of America over the world (and Europe in particular) led to the destruction of the nation state framework and the emergence of the open system neo-Marxist ideologies that still dominate Western Europe even today (with mass migration and the rest of the neo-Marxist bullshit). The Jewish lobby, very powerful in America, probably played a role in the American decision to attack Iran, but that is not the whole story, it’s a convergence of factors that usually lead to action. It’s known that US used Anthropic’s Claude in this action, in order to design the military strategy. I am reasonably sure that if you also use this tool to analyze the geopolitical state of affairs, it will probably tell you that this move is optimal. The problem here is that a long term war with Iran will lead to millions of refugees going to Europe, that’s the real problem. So I also hope that this will end quickly. I could be wrong, but Claude is rarely wrong.
Ethnic Russian nationalist Wolf Stoner wrote the following sober essay nearly a month ago, 6 February, on the small National Alliance forum, WhiteBiocentrism.com, anticipating the present war to come:
The Crusade of the Orange Jackal against Persia
The situation around Iran needs some clarifications from the position of healthy White Biocentrism; free from any alien influences.
Despite of the fact that Iran presently is an ally of sorts with Putin’s Neo-Bolshevik Russia, the Islamic republic is a thing of its own. Its cooperation with the Kremlin is the product of necessity.
The first axiom which we must apply is that all affairs in the non-white world, if they have no immediate bearing on us, must be left alone. The White Man must have nothing in common with any internal squabbles inside non-white communities. What happens inside Iran is their internal affair with no bearing whatsoever neither on Europe nor on America. Therefore, any military action against Iran by Trump must be considered as pure aggression and a war crime; a crime against White race because it would yet again expose Whites in the most unfavorable light before the whole world.
There are no “vital interests” of America in the Persian Gulf; Iran doesn’t present any threat to the United States; Iran doesn’t keep White girls on a pedophile island; Iran doesn’t swindle American tax-payers money; Iran doesn’t even promote mass non-white migration into America and Europe. Iran does nothing that threatens the core interests of the White people. Therefore, any idea that Iran, somehow, is a threat to “our democracy” is a lie promoted by our eternal enemy; the enemy that does all those evils that threaten very existence of the White race.
Now is the time for White people in America and Europe to raise their voice against this insane war-mongering of the Trump administration; the administration that resembles more of a mad-circus than a governing body.
If Trump plunges America into a major war against Iran, he must be considered as the worst president of America of the last decades.
So far, the only real benefits of the Trump’s rule were enjoyed by Jews and Israel. Trump is the more Jewish ruler of America than even sleezy Bill. He acknowledged Israel’s occupation of Jerusalem and Golan Heights; he pardoned Jewish criminals; he supplies unlimited amount of weaponry to the most genocidal state of the world. When reading “The art of the deal” I felt disgust to Trump’s sycophancy toward Jews. Jews are invariably good, honest and smart according to Trump. Trump is the obedient Jewish dog since his earliest years; the same like Putin. Both of them have Jewish close friends since childhood; both of them grew up in close connection with local Jewish communities.
The most important point is that Trump, being considered by the whole world as the president of the White Americans, does everything possible to implicate White people in the worst crimes whose real masterminds are Trump’s Jewish backers.
I frequently chastise modern Russians for their impenetrable stupidity and cowardice. But here I must note that present-day mainstream whites in America are not better. They allow themselves to be implicated into the conflicts that have no relation to their true interests. They remain silent when their elected rulers trick public opinion in order to produce required slanted perception of reality. There is not much difference between insane Putin’s followers who believe any TV garbage amply produced by Moscow’s predominantly Jewish media on the one side and not less insane Trumpists who are ready to support any wild idea born in the inflamed brain of their spiritual leader.
The greatest failure of the White people is their inability to act independently; their tendency to seek some kind of saviors and prophets who would bring a magic solution of all problems. It isn’t going to happen. But what really happens is that each time there is some new swindler who presents yet another lie in gilded wrappers. Each time mainstream whites believe this swindler to be the real savior and yet again fall for the dirty tricks of the same vile tribe that is always ready to produce any amount of “saviors” and “prophets” for the gullible goyims.
Enough is enough. I think that now is the time for the White people to cross-out Trump entirely, to designate this creature as yet another mortal enemy of our race.
If Trump orders an all-out attack against Iran, it must be the signal to act. All those who consider themselves to be White realists, must immediately start an anti-Trump campaign. Trump and his whole jackal-gang must be thrown into abyss. Attacked from left and right, they will have nowhere to hide.
Iran is the very important strategic counterweight to Israel in the region. If destroyed, it would create the most unpredictable consequences not only for the region but for the whole world. The only actors that crave Iran’s annihilation is Israel and worldwide Jewry.
Those whites who allow themselves to be implicated into this war on Jewish behalf must be considered as the worst enemies of our race. Yes, not even Jews but white traitors and blockheads, unable to see the simple strategic reality. Sometimes stupidity and malicious intent are equally dangerous and must be punished accordingly. I don’t care whether General Jack Keen is stupid or intentionally lies on behalf of Israel. His militant agitation in support of an all-out war against Iran is a crime against White race and he and his ilk (and their posterity) must bear responsibility for this crime.
There are some points that must be considered in relation to Iran.
1. Iran is one of the few countries which allows free research of Holocaust subject; it doesn’t impose state-sanctioned lies about WW2. There is no delusion in Iran about “glorious allies” that “freed the world from Nazism”. On the contrary, Iranians perceive allies (Britain and USSR first of all) as aggressors who occupied Iran during WW2. I have read Khomeini’s books. He was equally hostile to the liberal West and communist Russia. In this regard the Iranian outlook is much more compatible to ours what pertains to WW2 issue.
2. Before 1979 Islamic revolution Iran was, essentially, a puppet state of USA and Israel. Tehran was a den of vices, like 1920es Berlin: “free trade”, brothels, moral decadence of all kinds and corrupt state apparatus. The shah’s regime was a historic disgrace for the Persians. It is why the rebellion against it was supported by the whole nation.
3. Iran is the only state that dares to openly challenge the dictatorship of the rotten globalist post-WW2 system. It is why it is hated so much by Jews and their white gay/pedophile sidekicks.
4. Iran successfully curtails the destructive influence of the Jewish pop-culture. For example, it is forbidden there to use western pop-music in public places. Western decadent clothes are not allowed as well. I always supported those measures; they are necessary in order to preserve mental and physical health of a society. Iranian women are not herded into Epstein’s pedophile islands. I suppose, it is what drives Jews mad most of all. For Jews the most important mark of their victory is the unlimited access to the women of the conquered nation. In this regard the West is totally subjugated by Jews. White mainstream women are under mental spell of Jewish pop-culture, which goads them into the most self-destructive behavior, devoid of morals and self-respect. The nation that allows its women to become prostitutes (in the wider sense of this word), can’t claim any real sovereignty; it can’t preserve its identity and compete with the healthier nations.
5. Persians are the ancient nation that had to deal with pernicious Jewish influence yet thousands of years ago. Iranian collective understanding of the Jewish problem is far deeper than among any European nation. Mental incompatibility between Persians and Jews isn’t going to vanish even if Islamic republic is destroyed by American Golem and the puppet regime is brought in its place. The Iraq example shows perfectly well that any project of establishing “our democracy” in those lands is bound to fail.
Considering all those points, we must adopt the most uncompromisingly anti-Trump position on this issue. There is no justification to tolerate this brazen militant drive against Iran. This issue must become the stumbling block on which this Jewish jackal Trump falls.
*NOTE: Wolf capitalizes the word White when referring White loyalists and lower case when referring to Judaized white herd animals. Not a bad Idea once you get used to it.
The Jewish lust for power and lebensraum cannot be quenched, blood only makes them hungrier, and angrier, like sharks at a feeding frenzy. Someone has to put a stop to their power. It’s optimistic of you to think that China, which has a Jewish element already, will be some sort of anti-Jewish force in the future and not the next Golem.
China is the next world cop and only one world superpower, the globalist elites have already agreed about that. The domination of the Jewish-Anglosaxon West is over.
Greg’s Red Line idea of writing off Trump if he gets us into another protracted war will unfortunately empower the Democrats, but it is correct for the same reason that flogging a dead horse will not bring it back to life.
That is a pretty low bar, unfortunately.
However, I disagree with those who think that Iran is so based.
I remember back in 2006 when Iranian President Ahmadinejad held an International Holocaust Conference, which was pretty remarkable because in no other venue that I know of can there be a true academic discussion that allows doubting the Big-H and flirting with anti-Semitism or anti-Zionism.
At Ahmadinejad’s conference, ultra-Orthodox Jews who believed that modern Israel and Zionism were impious were allowed to state their case. Holocaust Revisionists Prof. Robert Faurisson, Mark Weber, Bradley Smith and many others attended this landmark historical Holocaust conference in the Persian land. Was this a rare venue where free-speech academic rules actually applied to the Big-H?
Shortly after the Teheran conference, I attended a get-together at a subpar corporate pizzeria in Scottsdale, Arizona with some fellow White Nationalists, Holocaust Detectorists, National Socialists, etc. The shop was across the street from my humble apartment, in fact, and I came along with the late Columbia-educated engineer and Holocaust Revisionist Friedrich Paul Berg.
The Canadian gentleman Frederick Paul Fromm was in town and explained there as he knocked back glasses of house Vino that he had tried to arrange attendance at the recent Teheran Holocaust conference himself but it was like herding cats. I can’t remember now all that Mr. Fromm said, but he was under no illusions that the Iranians were ever really very serious about Holocaust Revisionism.
Make no mistake that Iran is still a Third World country. Attendance may have worked out a little better for the late Bradley Smith (founder of CODOH) because he was used to living and travelling in Third World countries and carried no purse or scrip on a good day.
Mark Weber, the Director of the Institute of Historical Review, also attended the historic 2006 Teheran Holocaust Conference and gave some IHR boilerplate about Zionism or free-speech there ─ but upon coming home, Dir. Weber botched (badly) his one opportunity to give a decent sound bite on the subject of Holocaust Revisionism on National TV with (((Wolf Blitzer))) because the Institute of Historical Review had already ashcanned Holocaust Revisionism as irrelevant and was not even publishing its academic journal anymore because it made no money. (Academic journals are called loss leaders by publishers for that very reason, duh.) Mr. Weber actually denied being a Denier on national TV. Some people can sell vacuum cleaners and some people are better raking leaves ─ and do less harm that way.
By way of context, I was actually mentioned in the 2002 “Whistleblower Letter” against Mr. Weber’s helmsmanship of the IHR by Ted O’Keefe, the former editor of the Journal of Historical Review.
I wrote a couple of minor reviews for the journal and for Germar Rudolf’s brief successor publication that I’m proud of. All of them are preserved at Germar’s CODOH archive. My 2009 anti-War post (not an actual article or review) about whether Memorial Day was worth it was especially popular.
https://codoh.com/library/document/author/smith-scott-l/
Anyway, I’ve never claimed to be a particularly good wordsmith. My point is that Iran is not as “based” as some of us seem to think. Even President Ahmadinejad was not really very serious about Holocaust Revisionism. The Iranian President just vaguely understood that global Israel uses the Big-H as a major propaganda tool.
The late Fredrick Töben of Australia also went to the 2006 Teheran Conference. He styled himself as a Holocaust Revisionist, but in reality he was mainly just a Sedevacantist or Puritan-style moralist who yearned for a medieval puritanical regime and somehow thought that Islam was “based.”
Mr. Toeben loved those honorary Aryans of the Mohammedan persuasion, and he confused academic Holocaust Denial with “fighting the Joos,” which is not fully understanding the JQ either.
🙂
Myth of the 20th Century podcast recently had Germar Rudolf as a guest. Nick asked Rudolf about David Cole. Rudolf said Cole was not a scholar but a journalist and Coles book title Party Animal is apt. Cole is a good networker. His getting his article in the Guardian in 2013, I believe, underscores this nack at networking. That begs the question of why such a privilege was not accorded to Rudolf.
I don’t endorse David Cole’s “Holocaust Lite” stance, but I enjoyed his book about Republican politics in Hollywood and about his interesting life ─ his Dad killed Elvis! ─ and I would buy a sequel. Stop drinking and get to typing, David.
🙂
In that podcast, Rudolf indicates his hope for future historical analysis and work with a fresh crop of historians. The podcast is on Bitchute, among other platforms.
The world is witnessing that Trump is a world class bully, his puppet master being Israeli big cheese Bibi Netanyahoo. Jewess Amy Goodman, on Jew-owned CBS, granddaughter of a rabbi, credits her four-decades-long journalistic career and dedication to free speech <snicker> to her secular Jewish upbringing. She is absolutely surrounded by fellow Jew “journalists.”
james Smith: March 4, 2026“ “Banking and Oil ties”...[T]he Oman foreign minister flew to Washington so he could directly address this issue, saying more progress had been made and that the deal was going to be one better than Obama’s. He didn’t trust President Trump’s envoys, (((Jared Kushner))) and as well as… [his cohort (((Steve Witkoff))).
—
Why should the Oman’s Foreign Minister be expected to trust Trump’s Jewboy envoys? Was he looking over his shoulder during the interview with Miss Amy on Friday, expecting to be assassinated like his boss and 40 other top Iranian political and military leaders would be the following day, Saturday?
“Banking and Oil” are bargaining chips for Trump, james, but subordinate to the larger objective of further consolidating and securing Jewish power in the Middle East, America and the world. Fact!
Vainovalkeat: Edit: remove duplicate comment.
Vainovalkeat: March 4, 2026 The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Jee-zuz! It’s worse that I thought; thanks for the information, Will.
You’re welcome, V. I believe the part in that headline about central banks is accurate, but to throw the Rothschild family name into the mix smacks of conspiratorialism.
As usual, Greg’s logic is very persuasive; especially for rational people. He elaborates his case point by point and proves it beyond doubts; like mathematical theorem; in the best ancient Greek tradition.
I don’t want to challenge any of Greg’s assertions. The only thing that I would like to mention is that history proceeds not according to logic of the cleverest men but according to some unknown mechanisms that always defy human logic and perception. In this regard Dr William Pierces’ take on politics and history was much closer to reality. You can’t predict the coming events by logical analysis and intelligence alone; you must feel it. It is like animal’s inborn ability to navigate. It is why the historical events will be steered not by high IQ professors but by passionate visionaries; by religious fanatics devoid of instinct of self-preservation; people who put the idea far above their personal interests.
I say it not to blame Greg for anything. He is indispensable man who does his work excellently. His logical perception is invaluable; he helped to mainstream White nationalist ideas more than any other politicians of our views.
But the key battles for the future of the White race will be decided by such men like Robert Mathews and like those suicide bombers who have, eventually, expelled American Golem from Iraq and Afghanistan.
For such people to emerge among White race, our countries must lose their opulence. Desperate circumstances produce desperate fighters.
We don’t need to save America or any other political structure in the West. We need these structures to fall. The ensuing chaos will compel remaining Whites to fight and survive. White women will start producing multiple babies not when they are given social handouts but when there will be no medical facilities to make abortions. The White race will start to revive when put into conditions of Afghanistan. Yes, it is difficult to understand for people who for generations lived in comfort but the only way out from this liberal mess is through immeasurable hardships and return to natural life-style.
We must stop fear social collapse; we must crave it. It will bring ultimate salvation. Not preserving America (Russia, Britain, Austria-Hungary, Holy Roman Empire etc.) but destroying it, must be our main task. All major political formations inherited since the last division of the world 80 years ago must cease to exist. All honorable White people must absorb this simple but powerful idea
Yes, it will be difficult to survive without central heating, running water and electricity; but who said that the existential struggle must be easy?
We must abandon this 19th century aristocratic style of objective judgement. It can’t solve the kind of problems we face.
For now, the task number one is to punish Trump as harshly as possible; starting in informational sphere. Warren Balogh does a good job in this field.
White people must abandon their lukewarm attitudes and to adopt radical approach. They must become passionate. They must hate with boiling intensity. Such feelings make difference, if channeled properly.
Everyone living in America can make his input in destroying Trump’s political career and to harm his family interests. This jackal must feel the pain. We don’t need to consider in what Trump is right and where he did wrong; we must simply destroy him. It must set an example for others like him; for all those who want to exploit nationalist electorate in order to push their nefarious agenda. “Trump is pedophile”, “Trump is baby killer”, “Trump is war criminal” slogans must be pushed everywhere. The same applies to the junior jackals like Vance and Hegseth. They must be hit relentlessly and without respite; as long as it takes to bring them down (like Hegseth wants to do about Iran). This scum must suffer.
Wolf Stoner: March 5, 2026 As usual, Greg’s logic is very persuasive; especially for rational people. He elaborates his case point by point and proves it beyond doubts; like mathematical theorem; in the best ancient Greek tradition…
===
For now, the task number one is to punish Trump as harshly as possible; starting in informational sphere. Warren Balogh does a good job in this field.
White people must abandon their lukewarm attitudes and to adopt radical approach. They must become passionate. They must hate with boiling intensity. Such feelings make difference, if channeled properly.
Everyone living in America can make his input in destroying Trump’s political career and to harm his family interests. This jackal must feel the pain. We don’t need to consider in what Trump is right and where he did wrong; we must simply destroy him. It must set an example for others like him; for all those who want to exploit nationalist electorate in order to push their nefarious agenda. “Trump is pedophile”, “Trump is baby killer”, “Trump is war criminal” slogans must be pushed everywhere. The same applies to the junior jackals like Vance and Hegseth. They must be hit relentlessly and without respite; as long as it takes to bring them down (like Hegseth wants to do about Iran). This scum must suffer.
—
I’m glad to see your non-nonsense message here on C-C, Wolf. Our people need it. Where can I find Warren Balogh’s anti-Trump talk? I met him when he was 12-years-old, around 1992. His dad had been an outstanding National Alliance member.
I had planned to post what’s below about Trumps’s war on Iran, then saw this comment by you:
* * * * *
I’ve been watching Trump’s murderous ass-kicking of Iran a little on TV this week, mostly on Fox News. It’s not surprising that Fox is leading cheers for what Trump and his Jew pals are doing to the nation of Iran. I’ve often heard the news readers at Fox say that Iran has waged war against the U.S. for 47 years.
Ha! they even include the lone truck bomber who disposed of 241 U,S. military personnel when he drove his massive truck bomb into the Marine barracks in Beiruit in October 1988, reportedly with a wide smile from ear-to-ear on his face as he drove through the gate to the barracks. Iran was blamed for that. That bombing could be considered a success since Reagan withdrew U.S. military from the region shortly thereafter.
Tit for tat?
What Fox News has not mentioned, is that the U.S.S. Vincennes, cruising Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf in July 1988, shot down an Iranian airliner, killing all 290 innocent civilians aboard. American officials lied, saying Vincennes thought it was under attack (shades of lies about when the U.S.S. Liberty was nearly sunk by the Israelis during the Six-Day War in 1967 killing and wounding all of those American sailors — an act of war).
I found this essay by John Massaro by putting ‘Vincennes’ in NV’s search block: “Journey to a Politically Incorrect Land” at nationalvanguard.org
“BOY, you really do like danger, don’t you?” “Better not bring any Bibles with you.” “What are you going there for? They hate us.”
I turned a deaf ear to all the nonsense. People whose horizon is no wider than a television screen, who wouldn’t know a visa from a lottery ticket, are not the kind of people I take seriously when I plan a trip, even if they’re family and friends. So where do you think I was off to? If you guessed Israel, you’d be wrong, but that would be a more sensible answer than the country which had thrown everyone into a tizzy.
There’s only one bad thing I can say about traveling to Iran, and that is that the tourism authorities there make it so restrictive for Americans to visit that it would discourage all but the most determined. To discuss all the red tape and related hassles would take several paragraphs, so I’ll just touch upon one aspect. Before even applying for a visa, you must furnish all your flight details (among much more information) which are reviewed in Tehran, which in practice means purchasing an air ticket before you do anything. But your visa application can still be rejected, and if it is, the Iranian interests section in the Embassy of Pakistan, with whom you must deal, even though they almost never answer the phone (there is no Iranian embassy in Washington D.C., and inexplicably, the Iranian UN consulate in New York, one hour from my home, does not issue tourist visas) is not responsible for any financial loss. Catch-22, Persian style.
Visas, for countries that require them of Americans — and most countries outside Europe and the western hemisphere do — are, for the most part, easy to obtain. Depending on the country and how and where you apply, you can almost always get them on the spot, or within three working days at most. It took me nearly two months from the time I booked my tour to the day a FedEx driver knocked on my door requesting a signature for the packet containing my passport with Iranian visa attached. Ridiculous! And that was another thing — booking a tour. I had called the Iranian UN consulate to ask if I could travel around the country independently, and was told I could. Winging it has always been my style, except in those few countries where this is impractical or impossible. Yet everything I read on the Internet indicated that U.S. citizens were required to join an organized tour. Tiring of all this confusion, that’s what I finally did, booking with a British outfit with a solid reputation for down-to-earth travel. When I finally got to Iran I discovered that there’s an extensive and low-cost public transport network with plenty of budget hotels everywhere — my kind of place — but it is indeed true that American and also British citizens can enter the country only if they have pre-booked an organized tour. All other nationalities are free to go where they want and do as they please — except, of course, Israelis, who are banned from Iran and most countries in the region…
Younger readers of these lines may not be familiar with the 1979 Islamic Revolution that ousted Reza Pahlavi, better known as the Shah, and brought the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, his nemesis who had been living in exile in France, into power. The Shah was a corrupt and despised puppet of the U.S. and Israel who leased his country to corporate oil interests. Washington’s relations with Iran immediately soured after the revolution, and the situation became critical when students in Tehran stormed the American Embassy and took 52 U.S. diplomats and citizens hostage. They were held for 444 days before being released. The glowering visage of Khomeini, who died in 1989, was permanently stamped in the psyche of those Americans who today are older than 50 or so, and Iran has been demonized in the controlled media ever since. The low point of this antagonism came on July 3, 1988 when the U.S.S. Vincennes, a ship in our naval fleet which is always looking for trouble somewhere, then as now in the Persian Gulf, shot an Iranian civilian jetliner out of the sky, probably by mistake, killing all 290 passengers and crew.
Iran, an ancient nation known as Persia until 1935, and a respected member in the comity of nations today, is obviously detested by the media mass mind controllers, and every negative image of the country flows from that fact. The reasons for this hatred, as I see it, are fourfold: Iran is one of the few countries on Earth that will not “play ball” with Jewish international finance; the leaders of Iran recognize that America is a belligerent and decadent nation and refuse to take orders from Washington; they also understand that Israel is terminal cancer and that its days are numbered (the widely parroted story that they have threatened to “blow Israel off the map” — an idiom that does not exist in Farsi — can be dismissed as just another slice of kosher baloney: Iran has not attacked another country in more than one thousand years); they also have had the gall to openly dispute and even mock the Holocaust tale, going so far as to host an international historical revisionist conference…..
Read more about John’s trip to Iran at the link.
Very important notes on Iran. Many years ago, I have listened Iran’s Russian and English broadcasts on short wave radio (in 1990es-2000es). It was especially valuable at times of conflagrations on Middle East, particularly in the years of Iraq war. Iranian radio provided ample information, which was absent in other sources (internet was still unavailable before 2010 to the majority of Russian population). I have even corresponded with them. They have sent me for free a few books about Imam Khomeini and other related topics. In my letters to Iranians I openly wrote about my hostility toward the official version of WW2 and my dislike of the globalist system imposed on the world after 1945. They have read my letter on the radio (Russian service). It was around 2004-05. No other radio in the “free world” would do it. In the “liberal” countries you are not supposed to have such ideas.
It is important to note that Iran never invaded anyone in modern history. This fact is concealed from the western mainstream public. The last major war that Iran had was against Iraq in 1980-88, when Saddam Hussein invaded Iran, using its weakness after revolutionary turmoil. This invasion was surely facilitated by USA. It was exceptionally bloody war with the number of victims approaching a million dead. Iran had successfully defended itself, despite of scarce military hardware. This war was a shaping event of the new Iranian society.
I suppose that such blockheads like Hegseth don’t know this history. They hope to destroy in a few weeks of bombing campaign a nation that 8 years fought a WW1-style bloody war.
Most probably this attack marks the beginning of the end for the insane American empire; the empire of pornography, perversions and financial trickery. The Iraq quagmire has shaken the American state; the Iran war has the potential of decisively pushing it into abyss.
It is Warren Balogh’s telegram channel. https://t.me/warrenbalogh88
Wolf Stoner: March 6, 2026 It is Warren Balogh’s telegram channel. https://t.me/warrenbalogh88
—
Thank you. I don’t do social media, even Telegram since it had a phony Cosmotheist group there a few years back with folks who were not Cosmotheists, misrepresenting the creed, causing trouble for us. Cosmotheism will be around long after Telegram is gone.
I hit Warren’s link and was pleasantly surprised to find he had written this (undated):
Iran is the underdog in this fight and is holding out against incredible odds, we are witnessing a real life moment of the kind of heroic fight for existence against a fearsome and cruel aggressor that live on in legends for generations.
I agree with Warren wholeheartedly, though ours is a minority view among Americans so far. Iranians will fight on despite Trump’s devastating pushbutton war against them in their homeland. When U.S. munitions are sufficiently depleted, what remains of the Iranian people will live on heroically.
Like in Afghanistan (where empires go to die) the U.S. wasted all those years and American lives chasing bin Laden, only to be humiliated in defeat by its former ally.
Ambassador Ryan Crocker joined the Middle East Initiative’s Faculty Director Tarek Masoud on November 19, 2021 for a discussion about the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. Crocker is a seasoned public servant who has represented the U.S. as ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, Kuwait, and Lebanon. He was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President George W. Bush in 2009.
Crocker first examined the context of the U.S.’s hasty withdrawal; “At the time of Biden’s inauguration, the Taliban couldn’t hold a single province. It was a presence [the U.S.] could afford, literally,” he said. He characterized the U.S. presence in Afghanistan as an “insurance policy and an affordable one” because, in his view, it managed the threat from the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in a manner which kept U.S. costs and personnel losses to a minimum.
Ultimately, “we ran out of strategic patience,” Crocker explained. He referenced the loss of Americans’ political will to stay in the fight and their disinterest in making it a policy priority, as demonstrated by Afghanistan’s absence in the national political conversation. America’s unwillingness to invest in Afghanistan ultimately benefitted the Taliban. “Americans have the watches; the Taliban have the time—we ran out of patience…Failing to be ready to stay the course is a huge problem for American diplomacy.”
Invading a sovereign nation, especially for Jews, will not end well for America.
Vietnam comes to mind. We lost 58,000 American lives in 14 yeara — not to mention while losing the Jew-led counterculture war stateside. But that was nothing compared to the 3,000,000 North Vietnamese we killed. We could not kill their spirit. They knew they would eventually win and unite the South Vietnamese with the North Vietnamese in their homeland, as it should be. I remember a North Vietnamese general saying “You Americans have the watches, we have the time” decades before Ambassador Crocker said it about the Taliban..
Wolf, your conclusion above about Trump’s war on Iran is not un-American and should be understood and repeated by every American — especially White loyalists — concerned about our nation being controlled by Jewish masters:
… The last major war that Iran had was against Iraq in 1980-88, when Saddam Hussein invaded Iran, using its weakness after revolutionary turmoil. This invasion was surely facilitated by USA. It was an exceptionally bloody war with the number of victims approaching a million dead. Iran had successfully defended itself, despite scarce military hardware. This war was a shaping event of the new Iranian society.
I suppose that such blockheads like Hegseth don’t know this history. They hope to destroy in a few weeks of bombing campaign a nation that for 8 years fought a WW1-style bloody war.
Most probably this attack marks the beginning of the end for the insane American empire… the Iran war has the potential of decisively pushing it into the abyss.
ZOG is even weaker now, and Trumpy is even dumber than Buahy a quarter-century later.
I remember on 9 Sept. 2001 when ZOGlings panicked lining for half a mile waiting to buy gasoline for $2.00 up from $1.56 at the Granby FastTrip because they thought gasoline would be $10 within the week — that’s how much they thought Dumbya Bushy was going to save them. I loved it because I knew Dumbya was gonna start another ZOGs_War in Iraq and aginst the ragheads in general for the benefit of the Canaanite jews to steal up a Grater Shitty Bandit State for Grater Khazaristan-on-the Jordan. And I loved it because the ragheads would bleed ZOG dry and open up all manner of Civil War 2 precursor situations. And so it did. Mighty Evil Imperial ZOG got its ass kicked with ZOGling whiggers getting a reduced standard of living.
Courtesy of ZOG’s Rot Whigger & jew From 2014.
https://odysee.com/@PastorLindstedt:f/Courtesy-Of-the-Ret-White-and-blue-parody-360p:9
Vainovalkeat: March 4, 2026
The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Jee-zuz! It’s worse that I thought; thanks for the information, Will.
—
WikiJews list 214 nations:
List of central banks – Wikipedia
I don’t know about the “Rothschild family” connection these days. I’ll leave to someone else to verify, but in 2000 there still were allegedly nine countries without a Jew-controlled Central Bank: Those below highlighted in bold are the only ones left. Iran and Cuba are next — North Korea may be a little more tricky.
1. Iran
2. Iraq
3. Cuba
4. Syria
5. Libya
6. Sudan
7. Venezuela (coming soon)
8. Afghanistan
9. North Korea
Will Williams: April 9, 2026
Vainovalkeat: March 4, 2026 The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are:
Cuba
North Korea
Iran
Jee-zuz! It’s worse that I thought; thanks for the information, Will.
—
WikiJews list of 214 nations with central banks: […]
I don’t know about the “Rothschild family” connection these days. I’ll leave to someone else to verify, but in 2000 there still were allegedly nine countries without a Jew-controlled Central Bank: Those below highlighted in bold are the only ones left. Iran and Cuba are next — North Korea may be a little more tricky.
—
‘Cuba’s next,’ Trump says, as US pressure on island continues
Kate Perez USA TODAY
Updated March 29, 2026
President Donald Trump once again hinted at potential action coming to Cuba amid monthslong sanctions that have put pressure on the island and sparked conversations between the United States and the country situated around 90 miles from Florida.
Trump slipped in that “Cuba’s next” while speaking about the U.S. presence in Venezuela during remarks at a Future Investment Initiative summit in Miami on March 27. The U.S. launched a military operation in January that captured former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and shortly after imposed sanctions and tariffs on Cuba.
“We have been very, very successful. You know, when I went into Venezuela…I built this great military, I said, you’ll never have to use it, but sometimes you have to use it,” Trump said, before adding, “And Cuba’s next, by the way, but pretend I didn’t say that please.”
Trump then continued, imploring the media to “please disregard that statement, thank you very much,” before adding once again, “Cuba’s next.” He did not elaborate on the statement…
The comment is the latest of a series of pointed statements toward Cuba from the Trump administration in recent months in the wake of the U.S. sanctions, including an oil blockade that has put pressure on the island’s aging electrical system that has recently suffered nationwide power blackouts…
It’s not smart to disregard Donald Trump’s braggadocio.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.