1,775 words
So why are we turning on Trump? Why are we anathematizing the man and burying him with ad hominems? Why are we treating him like an enemy or a traitor? And, more importantly, why are we jeopardizing the November elections by fracturing the MAGA coalition which helped put him the White House to begin with?
Of course, the obvious answer is that by invading Iran for no good reason Trump turned on us first. He betrayed us. He broke his promises about no new wars and displayed sheer contempt for his base and everyone else with this stupid and pointless invasion. He also lied to the American public—and to everyone else—when he claimed that it’s in America’s best interest to send soldiers to fight and die thousands of miles from their homes—to say nothing of killing Iranians. Obviously he’s dancing to the tune set by Israel and its neocon missionaries in America. This is not our war. This is Israel’s war. Only Israel gains from regime change in Tehran. The only thing America gains in the bargain is more enemies and more debt. It’s like Trump learned nothing from George W. Bush’s near-decade-long adventure in Iraq when the Israeli-angle was even less obvious than it is now. Remember how Trump turned the tables on the hawkish Bushies during the 2016 campaign? Oh, what a rebel. Now look at him.
So people are galled by this war. I get it. I’m galled by it too. But why fever pitch? Why the drawn knives and screaming bloody hatred?
I have said this before. Donald Trump is the most pro-white US President we’ve had since Ronald Reagan. Minus this colossal blunder in Iran, his second term has been splendid. Do I really have to once again list all the unprecedently good things Donald Trump has done in his second term? What other Republican has even come close to his accomplishments? Starting January 2025, what I have seen for the first time in my life is an honest-to-goodness pushback against the seemingly inexorable march of the Left. Peaking with the Biden presidency, the Left—with all its concurrent insanity regarding race, degeneracy, and immigration—seemed unstoppable. It seemed like only a matter of time before the United States would descend into the next incarnation of the Soviet Union. I wrote about it at the time. It was terrifying.
Yet with Trump 2.0, so much of this was quickly and assertively reversed. It made me wonder if Trump was a mere hiccup for the Left, or did he truly represent a turning of the historical tide. Until late February of this year I was quite comfortable with the latter possibility. Despite all his flaws and mistakes, Donald Trump has raised expectations among American whites to the point that we won’t be guilted into accepting second-class citizenship anymore. He has given us a sense of ownership of this country and a sense of pride for who we are. He has banged home the idea that not anyone can be an American—especially if a person comes from the Third World. Would Mitt Romney, John McCain, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, or anyone with the last name of Bush have dared to take such a stand?
Trump did, and he won the popular vote in 2024. Am I the only one who sees how miraculous this is? Am I the only not taking all of these gains for granted? Am I the only one not wanting to throw all of this away? Imagine losing in 2026 and 2028 because the Right can’t stop eating itself. That could happen. And for what? Because Trump made a mistake by invading Iran? Because he doesn’t edit himself on Truth Social? Because he gets touchy and egotistical and impulsive from time to time? Is all that really so important?
Well, let’s break it down. Why is the Iran war so important that the Right is willing to risk squandering the great gains of 2025 over it? Is it because of dead Iranians? No. The Iranians themselves have done a pretty good job of supplying us with dead Iranians for over a decade now—perhaps up to 30,000 of them—and the American Right wasn’t up in arms over that. It is because of dead Americans? Well, we’ve had thirteen so far. Tragic, sure. But would it be worth it to throw away a decisive political advantage going into the midterms over thirteen dead service members? If so, then Ronald Reagan would have been in trouble over Grenada. What about a fear of another forever war? A legitimate concern, certainly. But we’re only a month in. It’s still too soon to be gnashing our teeth over slogging into another quagmire. And then there’s the fear that Trump’s actions will trigger a nuclear Armageddon. Another legitimate concern. But since neither China, nor Russia, nor Pakistan have been rattling their sabers over Trump’s invasion, I have a feeling we’ve once again dodged the nuclear bullet. And it is a fair question to ask if letting Iran get the bomb would increase or decrease the chances of a nuclear Armageddon happening in the first place. Finally, there’s the pacifist angle. Perhaps people on the Right are so committed to peace that they can’t control their righteous anti-Trump outrage? Maybe, but then one would have to explain the bellicosity that erupted from the American Right regarding either side of the Russia-Ukraine War in 2022.
So if it is none of the above, then what is it?
Like with so many other things, it all boils down to the Jews. People are willing to throw Trump under the bus because he’s acting on behalf of Israel. This is what gets people’s emotions out of control. They can’t help it. In many ways the American Right is behaving like a jealous wife when it comes to Israel. Once upon a time, our leader, whether he be Republican or Democrat would sleep with us seven nights a week. He would buy us gifts and take us places and whisper sweet nothings in our ear and treat us like the princess we’ve always wanted to be. Oh, those were the days!
Then, after 1968, the Democrats decided to sleep with their black mistress two nights a week. Twenty years later, they carved another two nights out of their schedule for their Hispanic mistress. That left three nights per week for white people, the wife. By the 2020s that number was reduced even further to one night every other week as the Democrats pandered to every race and identity group imaginable. It had gotten so bad that if you were white and you voted Democrat because you believed in their anti-white platform, then there was something wrong with you.
And the Republicans weren’t much better. I would say by 2016 the Republicans were sleeping with us maybe three nights per week. They had to pander to non-whites too, some more than others. It made us feel neglected, sure, but at least we consoled ourselves knowing we were with him first. He loves us the most. And when Trump was re-elected, the unthinkable happened. He brought us back to five nights per week! Can you believe it? In 2025 we were sleeping with our own husband five nights per week! Not only this, but he bought us flowers and jewelry and gifts again. He took us to the fanciest restaurants and the swankiest resorts. He took us dancing and to shows where we partied like it was 1899. And you know what? We loved it. We loved it so much that we could actually stand sharing him two nights per week with his swarthy mistresses, whoever they were. Because now we have proof that he loves us the best.
That is, until she came along—that tramp, that bimbo, that long-nosed, foul-smelling, oversexed Jewish whore. He told us it would only be a three day weekend in the Bahamas, but right now it’s Wednesday afternoon and we’re still waiting for him to crawl through that door like a skunk and tell us he’s sorry. But we know he’s not sorry because he posted what a blast he was having with that wart-faced, cross-toed, Semitic floozy all over Instagram and Facebook! So here we are on our second pack of cigarettes, fourth gin and tonic, and third box of Ding Dongs, and we are not happy about it. In fact, we are so not happy about it that we’re actually considering changing the locks and calling our lawyer and siccing the dogs on that two-timing, hypocritical, orange-aced oaf if he ever dares to get mouthy about it. And if that means we end up getting slapped around once a month by our next husband in that drafty 1977 Coachmen Cadet he sets us up in between the junkyard and the railroad tracks, then so be it! We must stand on our dignity!
Anyway, you see where I am going with this. In my opinion, getting too worked up against Trump over the Iran war ultimately works against white interests. The war is a blunder. It is not a betrayal. A betrayal would be putting ICE on ice, opening the border, and signing a bill authored by Ilhan Omar allowing full amnesty for anyone in Somalia who wishes to purchase a plane ticket to the United States. A betrayal would be speeding up white demographic displacement, not slowing it down. By these standards Trump is not betraying us at all. The fight is not in Iran, and we can lose every battle over there and come home with our tail between our legs, and it wouldn’t matter to me as long as the Trump Republicans pass the SAVE Act, win the midterms, and keep riding high until JD Vance wins in 2028. By that point, we’ll have a closed border and ICE deportations of nonwhites going into 2030s. Isn’t this what we want? And isn’t Trump more or less on target to giving us just this, regardless of the war?
Yes, I know that Trump and other Republicans caucus with Neocons and Indians. Yes, I know there are down sides to all of this. But what Trump offers beats the paltry fare offered by establishment Republicans. And it sure as hell beats the slap in the face the Democrats dearly wish to give us. At least with wins in 2026 and 2028 we’ll have a chance—maybe our last chance—to turn the tide of history and someday claim part of the Western Hemisphere for ourselves. And we can more easily achieve this if we help keep Donald Trump smelling like a rose, whether he truly deserves it or not.
42 comments
Betrayal ? Total destruction- that’s what I call it. Last night I watched JD Vance in Budapest and I am worried Victor Orban will lose election because Vance and Trump support him. Everything and everyone ( not just in US ! ) connected to Trump is going down with him. That’s what he has done. Probably on purpose. I can only admire the player who make these moves.
Exactly what just happened: Sadly, I just listened to the concession speech Orban gave in Hungary. Trump is already taking others down with him, and this is a major loss. Viktor Orban was a strong figure in Euro-Nationalism for 16 years. That there were other considerations is certain. I must admit that Trump’s profanity-laden Easter Sunday address left an echo that surely played a part. And it will continue to reverberate as Trump continues to flail around. This hurts.
The fact that Trump is the most pro-White president in decades is a double-edged sword, because his chronic lying and ineptitude have set WN back at least a generation.
At this point, the sooner he’s gone, the better.
I get your frustration but without Trump MAGA implodes and the GOP will either have to revert to their previous spinelessness to pander to the Left or go down in flames. Both options are bad. You want Trump gone ASAP, but do you realize that puts the midterms and 2028 at serious risk? The best course is to keep our criticisms civil and support Trump until his term ends. That is the best short term strategy for white survival IMO.
There’s no point in supporting Trump any longer. It just make us look even worse than we do already. MAGA is done and the Left is already on it’s way back into power.
Is he pro-white, or did him and his Zionist donor buddies trick white people into thinking that he represents them to get their votes? It seems to me that MAGA was an elaborate fraud against his voters
I don’t believe it was a fraud. MAGA was a genuine thing, but it turned into a cult of personality. Trump was just the right guy to come along at the right time, and we had to play the cards we were dealt.
We are turning on Trump because there is no use tying ourselves to a sinking ship. Trump is a liability.
White Nationalists are not powerful and influential enough to punish Trump or make Trump lose the midterms. We’re also not powerful enough to save him. His party IS going to get obliterated in the midterms because of his own stupidity, and even if every article and tweet from a White Nationalist between now and November was unconditionally pro-Trump, that would not be enough to save his presidency.
It gives me no joy to say this, but a return to Democrat rule is going to happen. And if you are going to heap praise on Trump for the positive things he’s done, you also have to give him the blame for that. There’s no having it both ways. At least for the short term, things are soon about to get worse for Whites in America, and for that we can lay a lot of the blame at the feet of one man: Trump.
Almost all normal healthy people are disgusted by Trump. I think there is a strong case to be made that associating ourselves too closely with Trump is going to reflect very poorly on White Nationalism in the future. The “normies”, outside of Boomers and Evangelicals, despise Israel and aren’t too sure about the Jews either. If White Nationalists are seen as the strongest, most consistent, and most principled opponents and critics of Israel and Jews, that’s going to grow our movement.
So why are we turning on Trump? Why are we anathematizing the man and burying him with ad hominems? Why are we treating him like an enemy or a traitor? And, more importantly, why are we jeopardizing the November elections by fracturing the MAGA coalition which helped put him the White House to begin with?
Great article! “We,”the few commentators on this website, and White Nationalists elsewhere are not doing anything to Trump, or MAGA. He dug the hole, and jumped in—guns blazing. “We,” White Nationalists have no power, and nobody pays attention to our griping on this website, and others like it. 🙃
You sound like a delusional battered wife desperately clinging to the hope that her abusive shitbag husband still loves her even after all the beatings and affairs.
Let it go man, MAGA is dead, it had a rotten foundation from the beginning. There’s no future for White activism in the MAGA movement. We need the entire Republican party to die so we can build something better from its ashes.
” Let it go man, MAGA is dead, it had a rotten foundation from the beginning. There’s no future for White activism in the MAGA movement. We need the entire Republican party to die so we can build something better from its ashes. “
Did MAGA have a rotten foundation? I’ve seen too many normie White people who are not elderly Boomers or (((Neocons))) at rallies since 2016 totally inspired by Trump, warts and all. And compared to what?
The only thing gained by letting the abominable GOP die is for the double-plus-ungood (((Democratic Party))) to gain in strength. There is a good reason that Jews overwhelmingly vote Democrat that seems to be lost on a lot of edgy podcasters. The Jewish Diaspora, and not necessarily Izrull, is in the driver’s seat.
Leftist Jews want their way or the highway.
My cousin, who ran George McGovern’s spectacularly failed Presidential campaign in 1972, said as much in her memoirs.
The Democrats stand to gain bigly with the end of MAGA and any faltering of the populist wing of the GOP.
The only way this would not be the case is if for some reason the Democratic Party was on the skids and divided ─ such as resulted from the Vietnam War, which was their progeny.
Gasoline is now almost five bucks a gallon where I am. That sucks but it is hardly our Stalingrad.
If Vance can pull off an agreement with Pakistani or whatever help that ends the war soon, Trump comes out smelling like a rose, and that will help GOP candidates in 2026 and 2028. That is the least anti-White option available.
🙂
Thank you, Scott. Trump is far from ideal, but he is not the enemy and has done us a lot of good, both politically and metapolitically. We shouldn’t turn on him over distractions like Epstein and the Iran War. If we can keep the border secure and keep up with the deportations until 2032, maybe we will be able to start something like Greg Johnson’s Slow Cleanse.
Without Trump holding MAGA together for the next couple years, we may not be able to accomplish that.
I agree with you, Mr. Quinn.
Trump messed up big time, and deserves serious criticism for it. Still, we should not abandon him, especially if he declares victory and ends this war in the coming weeks.
Trump has done and is still doing some good, and the Democrats are far, far worse. There is no better tool to fight them with than Trump and the Republican Party, at least for now.
Thank you for the article.
Thank you, Gordo. It breaks my heart how so many of us are punching right at a time when we need to be unified.
I can imagine that Heels-Up Harris would’ve made the same mistakes, as well as doing much worse. Given a choice between the so-so and the disastrous, the picture becomes clearer.
If Harris would’ve made all the same mistakes and more, should she not have won in 2024 just to drive the Nationalist anti-Democrat sentiment to a fever pitch? Then at least the Republicans could have swept the midterms and set the stage for a far stronger victory in 2028, perhaps not with Trump at the head. Now it looks like the reverse will happen, we’ll get a completely unrepentant, energized, Stasi-woke Democrat in 2028, Trudeau and Starmer on steroids. Expect severe consequences for Trump’s utter failure in this pivotal moment, the anger is justified.
I don’t know. Good leaders don’t grow on trees.
The backlash from a Harris administration probably would indeed help the GOP at the ballot box. But it would be the establishment RINOS, budget hawks, free-market Libertarians and low-wage global Neoliberals, and of course the ever-bellicose (((Neocons))) that would all reap the benefits ─ the kind that hate and have always hated Trump, who has never operated other than within an extremely-hostile establishment media environment.
Being a billionaire probably helps with that, although it still took Trump a full Presidential term just to figure out the system in Washington.
Musk is also a billionaire, but he seems politically clueless, in whole or in large part, and of course he is not a “natural-born citizen” either, so ineligible for the highest U.S. political office.
At one time Democrats could be relied upon to provide a “lunch pail” perspective, and while they might wear their Liberal naïvete on their sleeves, at least they were not (usually) anti-White. That is no longer true.
Sen. George McGovern was a WWII bomber pilot who would almost seem hard-Right or at least socially Conservative by today’s standards ─ and he wasn’t a grifter.
The establishment Democrats hated McGovern because he was anti-Vietnam War, and the hard-Left Jews and Counter-Culture Democrats despised him unless he was willing to give them the full measure of what they wanted ─ which they were not entitled to ─ and they hated him almost as much as they did Wallace, Nixon, or any White male non-Communist.
The truth is, we need someone who is not a grifter, but much more than just another “civic nationalist.”
🙂
Trump did royally bungle the Iran business. I don’t like it any more than you do. We certainly should hold him accountable about that.
Still, a Harris Presidency which delayed the “Thermidorian reaction” to the midterms would’ve been quite a gamble. There’s a lot of damage she could’ve done in two years: greatly accelerated mass migration, suppression of dissent, citizenship for illegal aliens, and so forth, which sooner or later effectively would turn the USA into a one-party state. She very well could’ve been Keir Starmer with tits.
I support a fundamental regime change – but in Washington, not Tehran.
But since neither China, nor Russia, nor Pakistan have been rattling their sabers over Trump’s invasion,
Of course, they are not so stupid. They are waiting for Trump’s Iranian blunder to become chronic and irreparable, for the US to get bogged down in this swamp, and finally lose its status as the sole superpower and the world’s policeman (it has already lost it, but this needs to be made visible to everyone), and then they will begin to implement their long-term plans.
Your prediction seems plausible.
Jeez. Where to start. First: To be disappointed or angry at Orange Man because he did exactly what he was told by organized Jewry and then ask to keep supporting him reveals a clear subjective provincial perspective. If a White Nationalist wants a better world for white people who love their own then you should support the war in the hopes that it will lead to the final Anglo Judaic pillar crumbling (aka: the good old USA). When the USA finally falls (and it will despite all the best efforts of white people in America) then there will be no great power to keep semitism’s pollutive influence from ruling over what’s left of the white world. Any new and aspirational movement in Europe can then grow, and hopefully and most likely in Eastern Europe, build the only real Civilization back without being squashed by Gringo’s wearing Metallica t-shirts and sucking on Bud Light.
Second: Trump has clearly and overtly exposed who runs things in the land of Liberty. An ever growing number of people of all races and ideologies are experiencing it in stereo. If you think that supporting him will actually help white people moving forward because he throws crumbs at you by saying old memes like “import the third world and get the third world” then expect to starve. Why not stand back and mock him and his ilk while further pulling back the curtain until all the Kippa Commissar’s can’t walk the streets anymore without receiving ridicule.
Third and finally: One would hope all the high IQ types and professional thinkers who consider themselves White Nationalist, anywhere in the world, would try to think beyond the borders they inhabit and think objectively rather than trying to prop up the very structures that have sought White man’s destruction for almost a full century(at least). Put on the big boy pants and accept that all the Anglo Judaic states have been spoilers for White Civilization(the one and only) and need to be at the very least neutered. Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, have all been made impotent and moving forward will be unable to do what they did last century and destroy White peoples natural direction towards sovereignty. Have faith in White people to renovate from the ruins of our lands rather than duck taping it until there’s no one left to rebuild. America is the final pillar that must go. It is following the same path as Spain did last century with wild swings in leadership and policy. Step out of the way and let it happen. The sooner the better. That would be a true victory.
The geographic Europeans seem as cucked now if not more so than anybody else. Dream on.
🙂
The geographic Europeans seem as cucked now if not more so than anybody else. Dream on.
Oh, I dunno, Scott. Have a look at this, from Ireland. For those with ADD (attention deficit disorder), forge ahead to about 6 minutes. Comments are good, too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLIu0HbBqBM
I can only say that time will eventually even out and bring things to some sort of equilibrium. Right now, many are disappointed or furious with Trump and his administration for waging war against Iran. Soon, given Trump’s spontaneity and the mobile nature of the world, other events will catch the attention of the people and send this war to the rear end of the collective mind. Although for personal reasons I will not be one of them.
I figured the Js put him back in office. Our “gains” under Trump are a sop to keep ZOG rolling a little longer.
Sure, the awakening is hard to undo; but keep a lid on it long enough, and the usual suspects retain power.
Iran makes all of this more clear.
Yes, Whites do need a better strategy, and Trump was never that. We knew that going in. I’m surprised that we got as much out of him as we did, and it is momentum in the right direction.
However you look at it, the Trumpenführer did Blunder or Betray us with another Interventionist War, but so far it is relatively-contained and there is a chance that the Orange Man can disengage. We can hurt the mullahs more than they can hurt us.
I don’t know what the winning strategy is. Appeasement is not the answer. Accelerationism is not the answer. And neither is more pozzed Democrat rule if it can possibly be avoided. “Weimamerica” is a very tough problem.
🙂
They get a veto on who gets to sit in the oval office. They allowed him back in. They figured out how to use him and his showmanship for their ends. It’s quite obvious.
If they let him back in, then they did so kicking and screaming.
Jews as a whole despise Trump and especially his White populist MAGA base that he has welshed on. The last thing they want is the normalization of Trumpism.
Maybe the (((Neocons))) might like Trump now ─ blazing away in the muddy footsteps of Junior Bush ─ but they certainly did not appreciate the Donald’s “America First” rhetoric that got him noticed and his “Fascist” campaign platform to enforce American immigration law, and to end the trillions of dollars of Forever Wars. This new Iran stunt hardly redeems him with the small hats, nor does it win him establishment favor and forgiveness.
When the Left (including its key Jews) is critical of Israel, they frame it as the Jewish State being another manifestation of “White colonialism,” and driven less by Netanyahoo and the Likkud Party than by crass, profanity-laden rogue Cowboys like the Orange Man. That Israel is a creature of White colonialism and White supremacy is of course nonsense.
As Mr. Churchill once said, “some like Jews and some do not,” but regardless, the world does not revolve around the Joos. And the notion that they have veto power over everything is a huge oversimplification of a very complicated subject as well.
The Jewish Question is a vital discussion that must be had. However, a “heads they win, tails we lose” approach will get White Nationalism nowhere.
🙂
Scott: April 12, 2026… I would be curious to see the racial composition of that jury.
—
Scott, you would expect that a search like this would turn up more than just seven women and five men: ‘racial composition of jury that found Trump guilty of felonies’, but, no, in that widely covered trial we just get this from the Independent:
The New York jury who decided Trump’s fate | The Independent
A teacher, two lawyers and people working in finance are among the jurors who made history by convicting a former president of a felony crime for the first time…
The jurors were anonymised, and their identities were protected. They were not photographed, and they were off-limits to courtroom sketch artists. Jurors were also not displayed on the screens in a connected courtroom where other reporters were seated to watch the proceedings on a closed-circuit livestream.
The article goes on to describe the jurors, except for their races. By those descriptions I would not want any of them sitting on a jury in which I was in the defendant’s box. But what verdict should one expect to be handed down against Donald Trump from Manhattan jurors, except “guilty on all 34 counts”?
Do you think that the jews would be arguing with themselves over whether or not to burn down Trump if he betrayed them?
I don’t think so.
The jews wanted a war with Iran.
They’ve got it.
Did you want a war with Iran?
If not, you didn’t get what you wanted.
It’s an indication of the inferiority complex of American White Nationalism that seeks to explain away betrayal.
Trump is a pig. No matter how much lipstick you put on him, he’s not going to kiss like Marilyn Monroe.
Trump is a jew-whore. That was obvious from 2017 on.
Whites need a different political strategy than voting for two different versions of anti-White politics.
Yes, Whites do need a better strategy, and Trump was never that. We knew that going in. I’m surprised that we got as much out of him as we did, and it is momentum in the right direction.
However you look at it, the Trumpenführer did Blunder or Betray us with another Interventionist War, but so far it is relatively-contained and there is a chance that the Orange Man can disengage. We can hurt them more than they can hurt us.
I don’t know what the winning strategy is. Appeasement is not the answer. Accelerationism is not the answer. And neither is more pozzed Democrat rule if it can possibly be avoided. “Weimamerica” is a very tough problem.
🙂
I appreciate your thoughtful and civil response, however I don’t see what you see. What is it exactly that you think Whites got from Trump? I don’t see anything that was specific to Whites. In fact, I don’t see that Whites who oppose jewish rule got anything except even more jewish supremacism from Trump.
In my view a ‘winning strategy’ starts with accepting that you don’t have a strategy at all, and I don’t see that happening anytime soon within the White Nationalist movement.
No social-political-cultural movement has ever faced the kind of opposition that White Nationalism faces right now. But instead of talking about those obstacles and how we might address them, we’re talking about ‘winning’ or ‘losing’ regarding things we have no strategy for affecting.
In my view, the proper course of political action for Whites is to first approach politics from the most pragmatic machine politics manner possible: Our goal should be to target any open, unchallenged seats in our juridictions by White Nationalists who have no public (or social media) provide as White Nationalists. Get into office. I used to think you should seek to be qualified, but with the DEI competency crisis if full swing, you don’t even have to be competent at all.
Get our people into offices at whatever level of government they can. Use those positions to start gathering intel on who plays what role and who serves what master. And use that intel and those positions to get more WN’s into offices.
Here’s a lesson from the jews: Don’t announce you’re a White Nationalist. Don’t announce you’re going to support or veto policies based on whether they help or hurt Whites. Just get the power and then use it in a way that does this using any justification you can think of that sounds good.
The idea that Whites needs to stand for ‘truth’ and ‘morals’ even if it means we lose is a dumb idea.
We need to be foxes who create the conditions for the advancement of the policies of lions.
Hamburger TodayApril 14, 2026 at 8:00 pm
“I appreciate your thoughtful and civil response, however I don’t see what you see. What is it exactly that you think Whites got from Trump? I don’t see anything that was specific to Whites. In fact, I don’t see that Whites who oppose jewish rule got anything except even more jewish supremacism from Trump.”
Well, I for one would prefer to live in a country that can and does “pave its streets” rather than one that can’t or won’t. There are a lot of things that don’t necessarily advance White Nationalism as such, but which are important concerns just the same.
In the United States, with the exception of celebrities like Charles Lindbergh or Savannah Guthrie, most of us don’t have to worry too much about our elderly Moms or Grandmothers being taken from their beds and held for ransom by a masked bandito. It is just not something that is likely to happen. Contrary to popular belief, Nancy Guthrie lived in an upscale and safe neighborhood outside Tucson, even if there wasn’t a lot of light pollution there like in Los Angeles or Phoenix.
Trumpism has had a significant effect on the way the court system has been going ─ and for the better. Since Roe vs. Wade (1973) both parties have appointed Supreme Court justices who would not touch the constitutionality of Roe.
The way out of that was for the GOP to continue to appoint Liberal or Moderate Catholics who were skeptical about Big Government and taxes but who could be counted on for sectarian reasons to only passively resist “aborton on demand.”
With Trump’s appointments he turned up “Conservative” to 11, and the result is that in 2022 the Roe matter was finally sent back to the states where it should have stayed.
There are quite a few other aspects of the courts moving to the Right ─ and by that I don’t just mean at the behest of Big Business or Wall Street, which is the usual objection.
The Marxist-dominated Universities now have to parse their DEI policies very carefully after Trump because they are under heavy scrutiny. For the first time in decades, they are actually being watched.
And this one predates Trump a bit, but prior to the D.C. vs. Heller decision in 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court had not heard a 2nd Amendment case since the 1934 National Firearms Act, which registered and taxed things like short-barrelled rifles and shotguns, and pistols with stocks, silencers, and fully-automatic weapons.
The SC argued in the U.S. vs. Miller decision in 1939 that the NFA was okay because it was just an excise tax and not gun-control. It probably also didn’t help that Miller was a professional criminal who was ultiimately murdered and his case went AWOL. Back then a 200 dollar transfer tax was considered steep enough to weed out the riff-raff. It was almost five-thousand in today’s dollars. Now the silencer/suppressor transfer tax is only about five dollars, which is pretty reasonable since you still have to submit your fingerprints in triplicate.
Anyway, Heller (2008) broke the log jam and found that the 2nd Amendment does indeed protect the right to privately own weapons for the potential purposes of forming a posse or a militia, regardless of whether the state has a National Guard establishment and lots of Kentucky colonels in bow ties who own roadside chicken franchises.
Gun-friendly legislation has been turned up to 11 since Trump took office in 2017, and one of the things that Libtards really want to dial back. When Trump lost to Biden in 2020, the Left was able to block national handgun concealed carry reciprocity. This means that if you are licensed to carry in Arizona or Utah or Idaho, the good cops in the People’s Republic of California can’t throw your ass in jail if you are passing through with the 1911 in your glove box.
Beginning in 1978 and getting chiselled into stone in 1981, the upscale-aspiring “diverse” Chicago suburb of Morton Grove, Illinois passed a law which made owning a handgun illegal, and this law was not repealed until after Heller (2008).
I can understand how some might not consider these things too important. Most people, unless they were raised in the South or the West, or are just plain urbanites like podcaster Mike Enoch or are actual loathsome Libtards, just don’t know anything about firearms.
Sure, there are the “gun tube” guys with Iraq War tattoos and “Garand thumbs” who blow stuff up on YouTube for laughs, and the ones who really know their stuff like the late Paul Harrell. It is such a large subject that it is easy to get lost in the weeds here.
The fact that licensed gun manufacturer and based Texas Congressional candidate Brandon Herrera has a wall full of cool stuff and a “sexy” YouTube channel is less important than the fact that millions of Americans already own firearms and even Morton Grove did not have the constabulary needed to confiscate them all. Nor could the city fathers really do anything if you used a shooting iron in self-defense.
I understood the importance of the 2A when in Basic Training in the Army in 1981 when I observed that only a handful of recruits could competently fire their rifle. None of the Blacks could, for sure, so a fair cohort of the unit had to be graduated anyway. And this is the urban demographic that is primarily who are killing each other in their “diverse” utopian neighborhoods like Detroit or Chicago, which already has some of the worst anti-gun laws.
There are many other factors to consider, of course, but if I had my choice of living in a Red State or a Blue State, I think I know the answer. Some seem to think that letting civilization go to the dogs will move the needle in our direction politically. I find that a questionable thesis. A death of a thousand cuts is still death.
🙂
Thank you for this reality check, Mr. Quinn, but I’m going to go further. I don’t agree with you that we should assume this Iran adventure is a “debacle” at all. The whole world is suffering from a serious lack of epistemological humility and the dissident right is among the worst offenders. You’re a gang of know-it-alls to the last man, and the only women you all want around are the kind who think just like you. Hence, you suffer from a serious trust deficit and even mock the very idea of trust to the point of irrationality.
I’ll illustrate my point with an analogy. A pet peeve of mine in modern Biblical scholarship is a set of assumptions made about which parts should be credited as historically accurate and which should be dismissed as fabrications. The scholars of “higher criticism” tell us that we should believe the embarrassing parts, and not the “self-serving” parts that would promote Christian belief. Now, this is obviously problematic, and does not track the way people ordinarily think. If my kids fess up when they mess up, why would I assume they are lying when they tell me of the good things they’ve done? The whole thing is an intellectual setup job where the terms of the debate dictate the outcome in a deeply irrational way.
Now, back to Donald Trump. We now have closed borders, a falling trade deficit, negative net migration, rising real wages, falling overdose deaths, anti-White organizations going bankrupt, etc. etc. etc. All of these policies are pro-White. My question is this: why would Trump’s foreign policy not also be pro-White? Since he has been faithful to his MAGA base on these other issues, he is entitled to the benefit of the doubt on this one.
I will freely admit that I don’t understand this war, and I don’t like it, but Trump has earned my trust. I see two possibilities: he either wages this war for what he believes are American national interests, or he has struck a bargain with the Zionist powers that be to defend Israel in exchange for their support for American sovereignty. In the latter case, he’s obviously not going to invite us into the butcher shop to see how the sausage is made.
You can accuse me of plan-trusting all you like, and that’s fair enough, but the fact is, Trump has given me a reason to trust him in a way that no other politician ever has by embracing tariffs, closing the border, etc. Trusting Trump is not the same as trusting other GOP politicians however much the right-wing Trump-deranged insist the contrary.
I have no idea what Trump is doing in Iran and don’t claim any special insight, but I do have some theories. In short, I don’t think that this is really about Iran, but rather China, a serious threat the dissident right constantly minimizes. I suspect the Chinese are attempting to use their control of the rare Earth mineral supply to thwart Trump’s reindustrialization agenda. Trump is, in response, trying to exploit China’s weakness on energy. He has repeatedly stated that he wants “energy dominance” for America, and he has said that we “must win” the energy-intensive AI race.
Again, maybe I’m wrong, and I would still support Trump even if I knew for certain this war was nothing more than a calculated play to keep the Israel lobby off his back. Unlike so many others here, I am under no illusion that our true Savior is chomping at the bit to take over once OM is out of the way. Where have all these potential Messiahs been for the last 50 years?
Thank you Lexi. This is well said. After all Trump has done for us in 2025, I get the criticism over the war. I just don’t get the venom. It’s self-destructive.
If my kids fess up when they mess up, why would I assume they are lying when they tell me of the good things they’ve done?
I don’t know much about politics but as regards children’s behavior, they too have their little issues and secrets which we (oh-so-wise parents) think we understand, but in real life can’t, as they are still caught in another world. Children don’t lie all the time (unless they are bad seeds*) and they don’t tell the truth all the time. They are a strange, seemingly irrational mix until much older, and even then, I’m not so sure. In any case, they are not saints.
*I remember an article on unz, maybe a few months ago, by Jose Nino, with the title something like It’s in the Blood. Worth reading.
Children don’t lie all the time (unless they are bad seeds*) and they don’t tell the truth all the time.
I hope to see the day when we stop talking about “children” this way or about something called “human nature.”
Have enough children and you will see there is no such thing, except perhaps in the aggregate. Some children do indeed tell the truth pretty much all the time, and even in rare instances when they don’t, their body language gives them away. Such children are rewarded for their honesty by always being believed. That’s a perk of having a good reputation.
Other children are different and will lie when they can get away with it. These you have to encourage to be more honest by pointing out to them that if they wish to be as credible as others they must learn to tell the truth.
The most we can say is that there is a psychopathic fraction of every population, and, contra Plato, they will control and dominate others unless they are kept down and controlled by hard men of will who defend civilization.
The Leviathan is not needed to prevent a war of all against all, but rather to prevent a war of the ruthless psychopathic fraction (scheming oligarchs and their street thugs) against the empathic majority.
This is a very interesting take on the US/Israel vs Iran story by a retired Indian general:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_PHD02hOBw
It explains how the other world parties see the conflict and it is not pretty. What a mess !
Tucker and Thomas Massie are far more principled, intelligent, articulate, and honorably opposed to the Great Replacement than the Bloviating Orange Zionist.
And they are far more electable.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.