1,829 words
The war in Iran is killing me. It may not be the most sensitive thing to say because people are dying. But still.
From the perspective of a racially conscious white man in 2026, things were going as well as could be expected with the Trump presidency—and in most ways they still are. I detailed much of this in a previous essay about Trump, and laid all the reasons why we should be grateful for what he has thus far accomplished. If there is one person who has had the greatest positive impact on the racial consciousness of white Americans, it’s Donald Trump—and this is taking into considerations his fickleness, limitations, and betrayals. Trump is the first major political figure in the multicultural era to run explicitly on the issue which by 2015 had become our 500-pound third-rail—immigration. This meant that he was concerned about white demographic decline, whether he realized it or not. Also, he never signaled obeisance to the politically correct Left the way George W. Bush, John McCain, or Mitt Romny did. This earns him the title of Chief Grand Poo-Bah of the White Race. Of course, this says more about his dearth of competition than it does for Trump himself. There’s really nobody else in the running.
But still, during the year of 2025, as pointed out in my earlier essay, Trump had real accomplishments which, coincidentally or not, benefited white Americans in ways which were unthinkable ten years ago. In 2042, when American whites finally coalesce politically because they’re desperate and start punching back hard against other racial groups, historians will say it all started with Donald Trump.
Sadly, the war in Iran is throwing a pall over all of this. Why? After catching up with what most of the war critics have been saying these past three weeks, I gather there are five main reasons:
1. The war discredits Trump personally since he explicitly campaigned against starting new wars.
2. The war is completely unnecessary from the American perspective.
3. The war is completely necessary from the Israeli perspective.
4. The war risks another Middle-Eastern forever war (with thousands of Americans and many more Iranians being killed).
5. The war, like any major war, risks World War III.
For me however, the darkening pall has nothing to do with any of this. My problem is that the war in Iran is causing the American Right to eat itself, thereby putting the November midterms at risk and increasing the odds that a radical-Left Democrat will step into the White House in 2029. For this I blame Trump and that part of his MAGA base willing to cheerlead this absurd adventure. But I also blame Trump critics who are so appalled by the war that they are pushing for the Democrats to win in November.
You can buy Spencer J. Quinn’s young adult novel The No College Club here.
Really? Are we really still in the age when we could afford to teach the Republicans a lesson by casting them into the wilderness for four years? No, we are not. Once the Democrats regain power, there is an excellent chance that they will not let it go short of a second civil war. They will throw our borders back open to gain a permanent non-white majority, and they will cheat in every election. Imagine the Biden presidency redux, except with someone competent in charge. America as we know it will not survive. Either American whites will rise up in armed rebellion or they will go gently into that good night. Both outcomes are bad, and avoiding such a ghastly future, for me, is far more important than whether the Iranians manage to hold onto the Strait of Hormuz.
When Trump says that after Iran the Democrats are America’s greatest enemies, he’s half right, and we all know which half that is. This makes him far preferable to the Democrats, who are increasingly believing that it is Trump and his supporters (and white people in general) who are America’s greatest enemies, and for reasons unrelated to the Iran war. And if you’re part of the Dissident Right, then you’re public enemy number one.
Which world would you rather live in? And does Trump’s great blunder in Iran really matter all that much in the greater scheme of things? The only way it could is if it triggers options 4 or 5 above. There hasn’t been enough time to conclude anything about the former, and, unless we start hearing sabers rattling loudly in Beijing, I’m pretty sure the latter won’t happen.
So for those of you who oppose the war, congratulations. You have a soul. You also know when you’re being lied to and find it galling that the United States is essentially doing Israel’s bidding in such a cataclysmically destructive endeavor. I am 100% on board with that. However, we should all remember the difference between chimping out and going full-bore Planet of the Apes. The first is laudable; the second self-destructive. Donald Trump has closed the border, he has led to the deportation or self-deportation of millions, and he is doing his best to neuter the Democratic Party through the SAVE Act. And what’s not to love about his decision to deploy ICE agents to back up the under-funded TSA at airports?
Do we really want to shake our torches and pitchforks at this guy? At a malignant anti-white gremlin like Kamala Harris, sure. But against Trump? I just can’t go there.
I may not be the greatest meme maker in the world, but here’s my attempt at communicating my feelings to all of you visual learners out there.
Maybe this sounds corny, but I want to welcome MAGA with open arms once the Overton Window and the grind of history takes them to our doorstep. I’m leaving the light on for them, you see. Yet if we start screaming bloody murder at their blond savior a little too hard over the war, I am afraid we’re going to scare them away. I’m afraid the Right will be disunified enough to botch the midterms, thereby undoing all the good things Donald Trump has done in his second term. If I were a Democrat that’s exactly what I would hope for.
You can order Spencer J. Quinn;s Critical Daze here.
Does this make me a bad person because I am not erupting in anger over this war? Aren’t I moved by the loss of life and the suffering which comes with war? Well, sure. I am as outraged now as I was when I learned that the Iranian government murdered anywhere from 3,000 to 30,000 protesters in the past decade. I get that Donald Trump diving feet first into the sandbox is not the same as the Ayatollahs wasting their own people over their Zeroth Amendment rights. But if we’re going to blow a gasket over one atrocity, shouldn’t we also blow a gasket over the other? Even just a wee tad? And if we’re not, then I think we all need to examine where our biases lie.
Basically, as of late March 2026, I’d rather view the war as a hiccup than a disaster. There is still time for Trump to cause a few more explosions, declare victory, and then vamoose. That’s what I would consider a hiccup. A loud, smelly, annoying hiccup, true. But one that will be nothing more than a memory in the minds of voters when the GOP (fingers crossed!) keeps the Senate and the House in November.
But I will say this: if Donald Trump still has us in the war by November, then he and GOP deserve to lose. And it will break my heart.
If you are not yet convinced of what I am trying to say, please consider the following thought experiment.
Given that:
A: since the start of the Gaza War, popular opinion of Israel has plummeted worldwide—especially on the Left and especially among the young; and
B: the prospect of an anti-Zionist Islamic theocracy like Iran getting nuclear weapons is and always has been intolerable to the Israelis; then it is reasonable to conclude that
C: by 2024 many wealthy and powerful Zionist Jews saw Donald Trump as their last chance to sic their American golem on the Iranian problem without having to solve it themselves with nuclear weapons.
It is possible that the hundreds of millions that Jewish donors gave the 2024 Trump campaign came with one long, sticky string attached: sooner or later they were going to ask him to go after Iran. And if Trump welches, the nicer version of this experiment has these same donors sitting out the next couple elections, thereby handing control of America to the Democrats once and for all. The not-so-nice version also involves some of them contributing to election fraud in 2028 (like they did in 2020) and Trump’s large family having to worry about assassins for the rest of their lives.
I’m not saying this is how it all went down, because I wasn’t there. But if it had, would any one of us have said no? Think about it. Four to eight years of Kamala Harris would have accelerated all the damage of the Biden Administration. 20 million black and brown illegal aliens in 2025? Bless your heart. How does triple that sound in 2028? We don’t think about it because it didn’t happen, but it damn well could have. Donald Trump saved us from that ghastly fate and has worked his septuagenarian ass off for the past fourteen months to make sure we never meet that fate. He has given us a new normal, sure, but we must always remember that this new normal is really abnormal—and we’re lucky to have it. Had Thomas Crooks fired his weapon a fraction of second earlier, we’d be complaining about a lot more right now than just invading Iran.
So again, would any of us said no to such an offer? Maybe this handy table—written from the perspective of Donald Trump in the spring of 2024—will help you decide:
| PROS AND CONS (IN DONALD TRUMP’S MIND) OF TAKING ZIONIST JEWISH MONEY IN 2024 | ||||||
| PROS | CONS | |||||
| Closing the border | Mass deportations | Prosecuting election fraud | Passing the SAVE America Act | DOGE | Tariffs | Invading Iran |
| Ending birthright citizenship | Greenland | Ending temporary protected status | Ending refugee resettlement | Ending diversity visas | Banning DEI and affirmative action | |
| Ending disparate impact liability | Purging wokeness from the military | Purging the ADL from the FBI | Pushing back against transgenderism | Cracking down on crime | Taking in persecuted Afrikaners | |
I’m not saying that Zionist Jews are good, trustworthy people. But if Trump is indeed acting on their behalf when making the rubble bounce in Iran, we need to remember that he (and we) are getting something out of the bargain too. And that something is an America that could potentially be whiter and better than it was just a few years before.
I don’t want to lose that, but if we turn on Trump now, I’m afraid that’s exactly what’s going to happen.
58 comments
The morning the war started the news made me sick to my stomach. This morning it was announced that more troops were heading that way. Trump is not going to declare victory and leave anytime soon. I see no reason to be optimistic about keeping both houses. The GOP is imploding. They’re worse than useless. The Save Act will never be passed. The TSA problem will be blamed on republicans. They’re obsessed with running nons in critical positions like governor of Virginia and Ohio. Worst of all they’re joined at the hip with Israel and everyone knows it. Add to that the Epstein files and we have a bloodbath in November.
Great article! Trump is botching the midterms, not the dissident right. 🙃
Correct. We’re flattering ourselves if we think we’re large enough to sway an election. Trump won reelection handily because of his support from non-ideological voters, based primarily on the economic pain they felt during the Biden years. They are abandoning the Republicans in droves because of the war and its economic consequences. Nothing we do over here would be able to save or doom the GOP in the midterms – that’s already decided.
I also have to disagree when Quinn says Trump will be remembered as the start of whites rebuilding their political will. Even if we accept the premise that Trump started that, he’s only going to be remembered as a Zionist. By 2042, Zionism will be so universally despised in the mainstream that anyone associated with it will have their legacy morally dismissed on that basis alone. It will be much the way that the mainstream today only remembers a Southern Democrat as a segregationist, no matter what New Deal initiatives they supported.
So long as Zionism exists in American politics everything else will at best be of secondary importance. Trump is willing to plunge the world into a depression for Israel. Zionism is a cult that has to be excised from politics with zero tolerance if we are to ever have even a chance at having a serious country.
I do not care about dead Iranian protestors. While sad, I’m sure many more White Americans have died from Black violence or deaths of despair. And pandering to Israel has prevented Trump from addressing these issues. Meanwhile, Trump has not given our White political prisoners any restitution in large part because it would offend the Jews.
Furthermore, I do not want to associate White Nationalism with Israeli war crimes. It’s worse optics than plastic stahlhelms.
OK. So given the parameters I established in the essay, which I admit are not the only parameters one could establish:
You seem to prefer a hypothetical 2026 in which President Harris greatly increases the influx of black and brown illegals and still may or may not strike Iran to the present 2026 in which President Trump is causing a great exodus of black and brown illegals and definitely strikes Iran.
Is a fair assessment given my parameters?
Two more questions:
How much of your WN wish list should any president fulfill before you would tolerate a war in Iran on behalf of Israel?
I think you have a higher bar in this regard than I do. I disapprove of the war but I can tolerate it because of all the good Trump has already done and could still do in terms of my WN wishlist (provided the war does not last too long). It seems to me that you don’t tolerate the war because Trump has not done and will never do enough good according to your WN wishlist.
Is this a fair assessment as well?
Thanks.
I’m glad Trump was elected in 2024 so he could reveal his true colors and the farce could end sooner.
However, I will not be voting for any Zionist candidate in the future. If Trump wants me to forgive his attacking Iran for Israel he can pander to WNs like we’re rabbis. He won’t and can’t because his limited time, energy, and political capital is being spent on the Jews.
Liberal democracy is a stupid game that awards aggressive minorities over dutiful, silent majorities. To survive long term (over generations, not election cycles) we will have to play as ruthlessly as everyone else. Hate the game not the player.
But what if Trump telling the zionists to pound sand in 2024 would have greatly increased the chances of Kamala winning? Is that a risk you would have taken given the existing parameters of today’s politics?
But in essence didn’t Trump tell the Zionists to pound sand during the campaign? By saying he would be America First, non-interventionist and would not engage in forever wars? Certainly what he is doing now is the polar opposite of what he campaigned on in terms of foreign policy. BTW: I agree with your argument in this essay, Iran is just something we have to put up with, even if it is like pulling teeth. The sooner it ends the better.
No, but Trump could have betrayed the Jews just as easily as he has systematically betrayed us. Take their money and run is what a true sovereign with self respect and will to power would have done. Besides, he has the likes of Ilhan Omar and Mamdani to scare them.
Trumpberg and his jew supremacist pals were always about throwing crumbs to the goys, while giving jews and their hidey-hole in the desert exactly what they want. Trumpberg has repeatedly stated (and demonstrated) that he has no problem replacing White Americans in a legal manner. It’s both humorous and bizarre that you cheerlead for this POS.
For me, the Iran attack was a big dealbreaker. For one, as the above mentions, it proves that Trump is merely a slave to Zionists and hence cannot be trusted on any other issue. This war will result in catastrophic further inflation, increasing gas prices, increase blowback abroad which will hurt us all, but particularly the poorer part of society. There already have been and there certainly will be vengeful terrorist attacks both here and on Americans abroad as a result of this. The Iranians are smart people with a long memory–again I call to witness the Salman Rushdie attack. This makes us all unsafe. (This is all aside from the moral considerations which I think equally strong.)
I think a moderate Democrat would be much better than this situation. Some Hispanics walking around are not all that bad. We just have to switch to more diaspora strategies. Anyway, I’m not all that sure that Trump was ever serious about deportations. As they said, he should’ve focused on red states and instead he focused on Minneapolis. This was just to generate domestic unrest and distract from what he was doing abroad.
that said, good essay, there’s probably no right answer as things are so far gone. Whites are caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.
From the perspective of a racially conscious white man in 2026, things were going as well as could be expected with the Trump presidency—
Yes. And I very much fear that this reckless Jew-driven adventure in the Middle East (yet again!) will lead to an undoing of all that. Our own people are what I care about. We can ill afford this mistake.
I get the worry 100%.
Protests in Iran didn’t come out of some vacuum of hate. They were quite significantly influenced by a history of crippling sanctions, which were relieved in large part for a while, but which then Trump reenacted when he scrapped the JCPOA. Recent protests were then stirred up by Mossad and CIA. And if America believes Iran is a wicked oppressive regime who kills dissenters, it’s knowingly happy to facilitate protests that get these people killed. Let that sink in.
Of course, America doesn’t go to war because a country doesn’t tick the boxes of liberal democracy. It does what suits it….usually, including supporting any brutal regimes for as long as it gets what it wants.
If America cared about human rights, it would wipe Israel off the map now.
However, in the case of Israel, the lobby exists to keep things on track because the relationship actually doesn’t suit America, is unnatural, compromising, damaging, and Israel is a pariah state to the rest of the world.
A pragmatic case about Trump’s good works is fine and should be made, but if one were to seek to justify Trump’s actions in this case: going to war to please one “brutal regime” run by our enemies at our cost and misery, by instead focusing on how the country that’s their target for destruction responds to being their target for destruction, that doesn’t hold for me.
People would be burning their draft cards today to keep themselves out of the war. Nixon would have made them required to present when voting: “You can get a new one when you’ve done basic.”
I’m really glad ICE ICE BABY took off, but let me confess something:
I don’t care who owns Twitter; after numerous chances it turns out I just hate the very format of the platform. I feel my brain slowly creep into sleepwalking and yet I stay up far too late every night ravenously and futility looking for chud takes and kino info. I’m completely resigned from the thing and I really want something else (don’t say Telegram).
Given to the extent that Jews run America, I would say it is safe to assume they needed a Trump to do their dirty work on Iran (the Democrats would very likely not have entered this war), after which they will gladly throw his goy ass under the bus.
The problem with this argument is the attempt to frame what Trump is doing as transactional. “Destroy Iran for us, and in exchange we’ll let you have some of your country back.”
Sadly, none of the good things Trump has done were set in law, much less in stone, and because of this war, they will likely be erased by the return of the Left to power.
I will never forgive this dumb goy traitor.
At this point, the best way forward is for Trump to be removed and Vance to try to correct course. But even that seems like a long-shot.
Trump seems like he has lost his mind. Literally. And thus far nobody in the administration has had the courage or responsibility to say anything publicly.
People viewing Trump’s Iran action as “transactional” should remember that, with Middle Eastern merchants, “the large print giveth while the small print taketh away.” They will just laugh at our naïveté and do whatever they had planned, sans transaction.
Not sure Trump is fully losing his mind. It’s more like he has been under such pressure, is aging, and has so much smoke blown his way that his carefully crafted facade is crumbling and we’re seeing the egomaniacal, reality show huckster, Jew-loving, BS artist underneath. Not a lunatic, but a vain, weak old man who is way over his head intellectually and demands 100 percent allegiance or else.
As for members of his administration, they are all now part of the Fox News, low-IQ MAGA, Christian Zionist, Tech Bro/Wall Street/Jewish billionaire crowds; they are either glazing him nonstop or are pushing him in his current direction. Vance may be already finding a way to jump ship so he doesn’t go down with it when it sinks. Very unlikely to openly confront Trump. There may be a major cluster ahead–we should be looking to make a big push for converts who have finally made the small hat connection. Before 2029. when free speech is likely to take a big hit.
Prior to this war you could make a convincing argument that Trump is fundamentally a net-positive, but I really don’t think so anymore. He is basically throwing the next election to the Democrats, and all the good things he has done are likely to be reversed.
He had a choice between America First and his own White supporters who love him and would fight to the death for him, and International Jewry. He chose the Jews, and we may be paying the price (very literally, at least in the case of gasoline) for years to come.
We owe Trump the same precisely the same amount of loyalty that he has demonstrated toward us. Nothing personal; just a business calculation. He should understand that better than anyone.
You are correct , sir. At some point, one has to realize the hamster wheel goes nowhere no matter how hard you vote for the lesser of two evils. Making an exit from the hamster wheel is a gamble; we know that the Democrats will usher in a nightmare if they get back in office. But voting for a Trump or a Farage can suck a lot of the energy out of the resistance by making people think we have real leadership; accelerationism is a frightening choice, usually a mistake, but it is becoming a very real possibility that we are not going to vote our way back to sanity and need the real threat of full leftist takeover to rouse people out of their racial slumber.
And yet, if you had a re-do for the election, you’d still vote for this dumb goy traitor who you can’t ever forgive. All your essays indicate this, and you keep contradicting yourself.
Yes, of course. The fact that you harp on this is simply a sign that you have a low IQ.
I harp on this because you continue to miss the larger message: you can’t be taken seriously with this contradiction, and it reveals a complete lack of priorities and vision for solutions. Next you’ll vote for JD Vance? That’s your bold, “counter-current” message? Vote as the neocon boomers would!
You’re essentially no different from a conservative grandma.
You’re just a child. Go away.
The author is right. The Democrats in 2026 are like the Bolsheviks in Russia in 1917. They have gone full communist. They intend to genocide the White race. They must be stopped, even though their opponents are weak, stupid, corrupt and evil. But the Democrats are the same, only 10,000 times worse.
The question is if the election were held today and Harris pledged to end the war Day One no matter what then—who do you vote for? Or even better, if the election had been held a month ago and Harris was a bona fide peace candidate then—who do you vote for?
Talking about the last election is a red herring. Unless you want to defend the rationality of voting for Trump from Fuentes, Striker, and other children who want to say “I told you so,” which is a waste of time. Yes, Trump was the rational choice for us, at the time.
But to govern, Trump has to be more than just “not Carmella.” He has to make the right choices.
Now let’s talk about Trump’s choice and what it says about him: he could have focused on fixing America — or he could have thrown that all away to protect Epstein’s clients and make war for Israel. Trump chose the latter.
That makes him a despicable traitor.
Here’s an interesting choice:
1. Trump gives the Jews a hard “no” and does all he can to save America: mass deportations, rolling back anti-whiteness, etc.
2. Trump starts a war with Iran at the behest of Israel, brings down the American empire, and kicks Jew-noticing up to 11.
Which do you prefer?
If you are Fuentes or Striker, I’d wager you’d choose option 2.
I’d definitely prefer option 1. But if we must have this war, then I prefer it to go as badly as possible for ZOG. If America’s empire is going down, I hope Israel goes down with it.
Let’s hope that Europe grows a spine and admits no Semites whatsoever as refugees.
Who would I vote for? Well, it wouldn’t be the Democrat. They are fundamentally anti-White.
I really could not care less about the fate of Iran. I just think that forever-wars are not in the American national interest.
🙂
Yes, indeed it would not be the Democrat–I think at bottom that is all Spencer is saying.
The problem is he’s also essentially saying vote Republican rather than not vote at all. Sorry, I can’t vote for the most Zionist aligned president, VP, or party in US history. If that means Dems get in power, so be it.
It’s insane how white nationalists argue to vote for Zionism. Supreme global Zionist domination would just continue indefinitely if this site’s authors had their way. It’s laughable.
You are an absolute retard if you think that simply not voting will discontinue “Supreme global Zionist domination.”
Mr Quinn, I sympathize with your argument here. However, I think you go too far in your praise of Trump.
As far as I can tell, Trump is an extremely selfish, arrogant, unprincipled man, who adopted an anti-woke, anti-immigration platform because he knew it offered him a path to becoming President. He is not doing this for us and is not trying to save us. First and foremost, I think he ran to feed his own ego and loves the power. I doubt he cares much even for his most loyal supporters (see Marjorie Taylor Greene). I certainly don’t think he cares about the demographic situation of the White Race.
As such, we do not “owe” him anything. We made no deal with him. When he does things that benefit us or that we agree with, it’s not because he wants to do White Nationalists a favor.
You’re hypothetical dilemma about whether we would take a deal to go to war for Jews in order to close the border is thought-provoking, but it doesn’t change my opinion of Trump because there’s no evidence Trump made such a deal. It assumes Trump thought “I would like to do things that benefit Whites without going to war in Iran, but that’s impossible so I have to accept the Zionist’s offer.” As far as we know, Trump is happy to go to war with Iran. After all, he’s said he wanted to go to war with Iran since the 1980s. I don’t believe he’s doing this reluctantly.
Trump identifies with the Jews in general, and the Epstein class in particular. Therefore, he swindles the goyim to benefit the Jews. The Conservative Movement is the same. They support Trump’s war of aggression against Iran, in return for money from AIPAC and other Jews.
Check out Tucker’s Carlson’s new video, The Great Gold Scam. He shows how many conservative influencers (such as Glenn Beck and Mark Levin) receive money from crooked gold dealers to persuade their loyal (but gullible) viewers to buy gold coins from these dealers at inflated prices. He does not mention the ethnicity of these dealers, but I can guess. The usual suspects.
Carlson: “We reveal how companies use beloved right-wing voices to sell precious metals at astronomical markups, leaving hardworking Americans betrayed by the very people they trust. The scam has run for decades because those who should expose it are often paid to promote it. That ends now.”
Dave
I think it is a little too much to ask in a liberal democratic ethno-oligachy like ours to expect a candidate not to be extremely selfish, arrogant, and unprincipled. One would need such qualities (along with charisma, energy, money, cunning, and an ironclad ego) in order to just survive the shitstorm that is politics, let alone win. Most of us don’t all of these qualities which is why most of us don’t go into politics.
I see Trump as simply being more honest about having these qualities than his competition. I also think he has these negative qualities you mention to a lesser degree than most other politicians who keep them hidden.
That said I do think Trump is doing his best and really wants what’s best for America and Western civilization. Not every mistake he makes is a betrayal. And not every betrayal means he wishes us ill. And I always try to balance his mistakes and betrayals with all the good he has done, which is greater than I thought possible before 2025.
Trump is not the wise and just leader who loves us that we all crave. Such a person can only exist in a monarchy or its modern equivalent, fascism. Until we can get and perfect such a system, I think we should realize that in the frustrating and flawed system we have now, Trump is as good as we’re gonna get.
Interesting that you would say Trump has been wanting to go to war with Iran since the 80’s as I remember reading in the old Spotlight a list of something like six or eight countries yet to be brought into the Central Bank system and Iran was on that list.
Otherwise I think he is doing a pretty good job repatriating manufacturing and bringing crime under control.
Spencer: The war is completely necessary from the Israeli perspective…
—
AIPAC Fury says it all.
It’s not just Israel that benefits from Trump’s war, but greater Jewry that controls America’s mass mind. Dr. Pierce explained:
“The Jews Are Our Misfortune (Transcript of Classic ADV Broadcast)” at nationalalliance.org
by Dr. William L. Pierce
IF YOU’VE been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that the issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly every broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the mass media of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the opinions and attitudes of about 95 per cent. of the population. I have pointed out that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in collusion with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need most people have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a perceived norm.
The media bosses use their control over the mass media of entertainment — and to a lesser extent over the news media — to create an artificial norm that is presented to the public through television, motion pictures, advertising, and other media, and this artificial norm is the one perceived as real by most of the public. Through their control of public opinion the media bosses also control the democratic political process and governmental policy in a way that is advantageous to them and disadvantageous to the White public. And these media bosses are overwhelmingly Jews.
That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish media control and have presented different specifics, different details, in various broadcasts. I’ve discussed a number of different Hollywood films or television shows as specific examples of the way in which the Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to promote fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but that advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and exploit our society.
I’ve talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the mass media, and I’ve pointed out specific instances of the destructive way in which they use their control…
The distortion has been deliberate, planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No number of funny Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers can compensate for this harm.
When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any doubt: The Jews are our misfortune. It’s way past time for us to accept this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled “anti-Semitic” for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these fears which have been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass media, and then to begin working to improve our fortunes. Thanks for being with me again today.
So much more undeniable truth presented by William Pierce 25 years ago at the link above.
David M. Zsutty: March 26, 2026 … Trump could have betrayed the Jews just as easily as he has systematically betrayed us…
—
David, you are terminally naive to believe that.
The Israel First, “most Jewish non-Jew” Shabbos goy is in their pocket, not ours, no matter how many times he dons his foolish MAGA cap.
Thousands of Marines, 82d Airborne soldiers and Delta Force SF troops are reported to be arriving over there in harm’s way tomorrow. How’s that not betraying us in favor of his Jewish masters?
Will, I think David was responding to my hypothetical question to point out that Trump could have betrayed his Jewish donors and by extension Israel by not starting this war, but didn’t. I think one of David’s points was that Trump would rather betray MAGA than Israel. I’m pretty sure you and David have similar viewpoints on this.
If not, I’ll shut up. Thanks.
Spencer Quinn: March 26, 2026 Will, I think David was responding to my hypothetical question to point out that Trump could have betrayed his Jewish donors and by extension Israel by not starting this war, but didn’t. I think one of David’s points was that Trump would rather betray MAGA than Israel. I’m pretty sure you and David have similar viewpoints on this.
If not, I’ll shut up. Thanks.
—
Don’t shut up, Spence. This is such an important topic, even if it invites differing opinions. Your hypothetical went right over my head. I apologize for that.
I certainly agree with David that Trump will betray White America rather than betray Israel, and by extension Jewry. That is a fact.
Thanks, Will. I appreciate it.
Spencer Quinn: March 27, 2026 Thanks, Will. I appreciate it.
—
You’re welcome.
Watching some Washington Journal on C-SPAN this morning. For once the callers seem to be White and they all oppose Trump’s war against Iran. A good sign.
Re Iranian protesters earlier this year:
The link given in the article is to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, a media/propaganda organization funded by the US state (originally via the CIA). A more neutral source would be needed on this issue, which has enough complexity to allow for considerable distortions in either direction.
Secondly, there should be no misconception: Every state leader – incl. Trump of course – would use force against “protestors” that were armed, organized and emboldened by foreign intelligence agencies. Pro-Western governments in Latin America were justified in doing so against Communists back in the Cold War, for example.
Thirdly, political conflicts in the Middle East are always bloody by white standards – a baseline that should be taken into account. Saudi Arabia would do the same, as would Turkey, Jordan, Egypt etc.
Spencer Quinn has a very level head, surely he knows that his position is not a popular one in our circles, yet instead of getting emotional and up in arms over Trump’s betrayal he methodically lays out the case why Trump is still the right choice. It is a more prosaic approach than railing against the President but it has the wisdom of perspective.
Trump isn’t up for election.
Still the right choice–metaphorically speaking.
Thank you, Douglas. I always try to keep a level head!
Makes sense.
I’m old enough to remember the 1972 Nixon landslide with President Nixon winning 49 out of 50 states. Then …. yes, the WaPost, CBS Jews media took out the Nixon Administration in a media coup over the trivial Watergate scandal nobody was killed in Watergate, nobody was raped. More people died in Ted Kennedy’s car than in Watergate, Roman Polanski raped more under age girls than were raped in Watergate. What was Watergate all about? Some low level Jewish Defense Department official Daniel Ellsberg was illegally leaking classified documents to the New York Times, Jew York Times documents that said the Viet Nam War wasn’t going very well and would probably end in a stalemate same as the Korean War.
WOW WHAT A SECRET!
I was 11 years old at the time and I knew that, same as I knew there really was an Italian American organized Crime mafia, another big secret similar to the secret that the lead singer of the band “Queen” Freddy Mercury was “gay” or Bob Marley smoked MJ.
Like duhhhhh.
IMO it looks like the Js in the USA, Israel and elsewhere will try to get as much US war from the Trump Administration against Iran, other neighbors of Israel, get Gaza out of the news, then the Js especially the Jews Media in the USA will pull the rug out of the Trump Administration the same as they did to the Richard Nixon administration. Jews in the USA vote over 85% anti White, Lib Leftist Demorat and AIPAC has pretty much pushed aside the few Dems of color speaking against GAZA.
That’s my view as I’ve seen this movie many times before.
It is too late to cheer for President Trump. He can do, has done, is doing, and will continue to do things that go beyond any attempt to rescue or excuse him.
In relation to the Jews President Trump has set himself up to be a servant and a scapegoat. Any Whites that go with him politically will share that status in relation to Israel’s war on Iran and many other misfortunes.
In relation to the values and interests of many of his former supporters President Trump has effectively followed the advice of Jesus in a political sense; that is, he has tied a millstone around his neck and jumped into the deep sea. I know there are people here who for honest reasons think the Epstein cabal and the president’s cover-up were not important, but a lot of White people see it differently (and I am not ashamed to be in their company). President Trump reversed himself, took the side of evil Jews, and insulted people who just wanted him to keep his promises. Calling that political malpractice is mild.
In relation to the vital interests of Whites President Trump has thrown away his implicitly pro-White agenda for the sake of making war on goyim in the Middle East. This is useless, dishonorable, and violently stupid.
I can’t excuse this and I’m not willing to try.
I agree with the sentiments of this article. America is enslaved to Jewish power. America First really means America Second and we are fortunate to even have that. It buys time which Internet WNs squander. It’s pragmatic to accept the reality of the current conditions and death to reject it, but the low-IQ, low-attention-span dissident majority is just as incapable of comprehending this as they are incapable of getting off the screen and making real progress (of any kind) in real life. One of my burner alias influencer accounts has taken appreciable losses for pointing this out. Most could not even get the importance of Epstein and just emotionally reacted to sensational anonymous FBI tips.
Instead of self-destructing over Iran, try to get a quid pro quo payoff in the form of deportations. So far, every time Trump has done something for Judah, they have allowed him to do something for Ethnic Americans.
Side note: I don’t appreciate all of the constant faux-omniscient arrogance I read in the comments of the mindless majority. They constantly make proclamations about future events, e.g: “November Is Over,” “Nothing Good Will Result From This.” They are too unintelligent to realize that these are merely their mentally limited opinions regarding possibilities. It’s not impossible that a regime change in Iran would be great for humanity, for example. I am beginning to recognize that Spiteful Mutant Syndrome isn’t entirely a Leftist phenomenon.
I still think there is time for Trump to declare victory, end the war, and be poised to keep the house and senate in November. I dearly hope this happens because that will mean more deportations and more time for trump’s policies to take effect and a better chance for the SAVE act to be passed, and a better chance Vance wins in 2028. We shoot ourselves in the foot if we turn on him now. I honestly believe Trump is our last hope to reverse our demographic decline. In the long run the Iran War means little compared to this.
Trump cannot simply “declare victory” and withdraw without effectively ceding control of the Strait of Hormuz to Iran. Such a move would shatter the petrodollar system, cripple America’s ability to sustain its military and global network of bases, and set in motion a profound reordering of the post-1945 international system—indeed, a reshaping of the broader global order that has prevailed since 1492—with the West significantly diminished in power and influence.
I don’t claim any particular insight—or “faux omniscience” per Scott Wood. I’m simply an ordinary creature of the internet. That said, Trump’s actions have been not only reckless but astonishingly self-destructive, driving the United States into a perilous inflection point in global affairs.
Even if the mercurial and ever-fickle Trump were to try shifting course, he is no longer in the driver’s seat; the inflection point has already been crossed. As a nationalist who would welcome a strategic retreat to our own hemisphere, I nevertheless recognize the terrible costs we will have to bear. The collapse of the petrodollar will shake the federal government to its foundations, pushing the nation into insolvency, widespread urban riots, and severe economic depression. Politically, it will virtually assure the unchecked dominance of the Left and the flooding of our borders on an unprecedented scale. Europe will face parallel crises, especially if famine were to sweep the global South. The cumulative result would be calamitous — and, even at this early stage, such a scenario is likely unavoidable.
History is filled with remarkably stupid decisions that turned victor into vanquished in an eye blink. The Ottoman Grand Vizier’s decision not to fully protect his flanks from the Poles in the Second Siege of Vienna, Napoleon’s invasion of Russia, Pickett’s Charge, Hitler’s decision to open up an eastern front against the Soviets while still fighting against the Allied forces in the West. Trump’s decision to attack Iran may go down as equally disastrous. Maybe not as immediate or dramatic, but sort of like tugging on the thread that unravels the entire sweater.
But what if the war is over in a month?
Spencer,
First off, I must apologize: I meant this comment to be on Greg’s article, not this one. Let’s call it a “senior moment.” But, since you responded, even if the war is over quickly, the US will still have suffered a great loss of international prestige. The petrodollar system will still be further damaged (putting our entire economy at risk), the Gulf States will likely not see us as worthy protectors, and Trump’s bond with many of his supporters will still be severed, putting the radical left back in charge. Plus, Trump has been badly exposed as caring about nothing but Israel and his own public image.
I voted for Trump in 3 primaries and 3 general elections. This time around was like a “Hail Mary” pass in the end zone; unless he did all the right things, our country was going to take a huge hit, and the odds were very much against it. But it was still worth taking a chance on him. With this decision (and some others) it is now obvious that he is not going to masterfully right the ship of state, and our country is going to suffer greatly for it. If there is any hope, it is that the far right will be able to act opportunistically among the wreckage and gain a seat at the table.
Thank you Derek. But even if what you say is true after a brief war in Iran, winning the election in November and keeping up the deportations unimpeded through 2028 and quite possibly 2032 is far more important than the economy or loss of prestige. Both these things are fickle and can change direction like the wind. What if the economy is doing great in November? What if Trump somehow regains prestige by then? Ye of little hope!
If the dissident right and the America First right can simply stay unified with the only president since Eisenhower who has the guts to deport 3rd worlders we have an excellent chance of reversing our demographic decline.
Declaring Trump a traitor at this point harms our chances.
I guess I am not angry about Iran because I have always considered Trump a fraud who is incedentally aiding our cause, mainly by confusing the shit out of our enemies, even the ones with which he collaborates. And, though he is not our guy, nor the least bit sincere, he has inspired many to good ends, who perhaps don’t see him for what he really is.
I agree his lot is preferable to returning full control to his opposition.
Either way, we don’t get out of this without massive domestic bloodshed. But, at least with Trump we get time to gather fellow-travellers.
The Iran war, I believe, is already out of Trump’s control. He can walk away and declare victory, but the Israelis will not stop and Trump will not abandon them to Iranian hyper-missiles. That’s assuming the Zionist crazies will not go nuclear. If so, then, WW3.
I share Spencer’s dread of the Left starting a taking over in 11-2026, but given Trump’s lack of control, the Iranian firm grasp on the straits of Hormuz and all-ready crashing economy, that is already a fait accompli.
Here is what I think Spencer is missing in the analysis. If this war goes on much longer, there will be either (a) a massive military blow to the US (such as the sinking of an aircraft carrier along with 5000 personnel) or a world wide energy shortage catastrophe such as we’ve never experienced in or lives. Either way, whether the Democrats take power or the Republicans hold it, the country will be in complete political, economic collapse, ungovernable — anarchy and civil war are the likely scenarios.
If you have a Subscriber access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.