5 comments

1. Ian Connolly says:

   June 10, 2023 at 10:43 am

   When it comes to whites in Europe, I can understand there being more of an ethnic component behind it (England for the English, Poland for the Poles, Norway for the Norwegians, etc) and less of a Pan-European component — as these are ancestral homelands were are speaking of.  This is not to say that a slim number of Hungarians don’t live in England, and they’d have to learn the English language and whatnot, but by and large, whites in European Nations will be different than the rest of the West, and that’s ok.

    

   Whites in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand — it’s definitely more of a Pan-European model: the emphasis more on being White, and less to do with the ethnic background.  Whites in these nations speak English across the board, share similar opinions on Government, culture, religion, and morals, and usually only celebrate the ethnic part of their Whiteness in their homes (food, music, holidays, etc).  This is also ok.

    

   This is also not to imply that all white Europeans assimilated equally well into the American way (The Irish and the Italians were not the Best immigrants) and the 1924 Immigration Act understood this, but there’s no debate that the least good Irish immigrant was still lightyears ahead of a Haitian, Vietnamese, or Guatemalan immigrant (legal or not) and that’s when the racial complement comes in, indifferent to the ethnic component.

   0

   0

   1. John says:

      June 10, 2023 at 2:25 pm

      Canada, USA, Australia, NZ were created, were built from inception as European outposts, European homelands.

      0

      0

      1. Antipodean says:

         June 11, 2023 at 3:02 am

         That’s a nice idea but, not really true. All were outposts of Empire, British or French with demographics to match. I am aware of explicit European-only immigration policies for the USA and Australia, in both cases just after the inception of the nation.

         The USA was very largely English and Scots, some Germans and French, until the early to mid-nineteenth century. Canada was mostly French until after the Revolutionary War and then became progressively British until after the second war. Australia was majority British with a large Irish minority and hardly anyone else, bar a few Greeks, Germans and Italians, until mid-twentieth century. New Zealand was very largely British ( and Maori ) until the second half of the twentieth century.

         In Australia, at least until the 1970s, there was a strong drive to assimilate for all migrants. Standing out was not tolerated but was the subject of shame and ridicule. Even the odd Chinese  was assimilated in this fashion. It sounds terribly uneducated and unfair to modern ears but that’s how a culture is enforced. Those people of fifty years ago never would have put up with the Pride Flag or taking the knee for BLM.

         0

         0

         1. John says:

            June 11, 2023 at 8:01 am

            It is with certainty that the Europeans who explored, settled, worked, bled, died, & carved out a civilization out of the wilderness they found was NOT  to become a minority.  It is in this context that Canada, USA, Australia, NZ r European homelands.

            0

            0
2. Charles Aznavour says:

   June 10, 2023 at 3:04 pm

   I was under the impression that ethno-nationalism vs imperialism was an even broader dichotomy involving nonwhites. I’ve heard people like Richard Spencer argue that we can’t just cede land and these people need to be ruled over anyway. So that’s why I assumed ‘imperialism’ in this context was. Who in their right mind would want that at this point? Who would want to erase the rest of the European languages? We need as many obstacles to uniformity as possible.

   0

   0

Comments are closed.