Pox Populi did a solo Telegram stream last week on Greg Johnson’s essay “Against Imperialism,” reading it aloud and then chatting with listeners about ethnonationalism versus imperialism. It is now available for download and online listening. It is also available on YouTube, below.
To listen in a player, click here. To download, right-click the link and click “save as.”
Telegram Live Stream, Jan 5, 2023
* * *
Don’t forget to sign up for the weekly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
the recipient’s name
the recipient’s email address
your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Pox Populi implies that Gregory Hood’s great White state would turn against Whites because it would be big. Pox Populi says that the European Union is proof that the danger is real, because it is antiwhite and it is big. Pox Populi also points out that the European Union cannot be reformed because it was an antiwhite project from the beginning.
Gregory Hood’s aspirational great White state would be a pro-White project from the beginning. So if you can’t make a super-state other than what it was designed to be, racially, the great White state of Gregory Hood should be good for Whites. If you can make a super-state other than what it was meant to be, racially, then Gregory Hood’s great White state might go antiwhite, and the European Union might be reformed and become pro-White.
If you can’t make a state other than what it was meant to be, racially, then the Scottish independence movement is sure to be antiwhite, because it was an antiwhite project from the beginning. It cannot be reformed, and neither can its peers.
Should we support prospective successor states such as the Scottish state and the Catalan state because we assume that antiwhite states can be reformed, and should we in effect support the dissolution of states such as Great Britain and Spain because we also assume that antiwhite states cannot be reformed? How does that add up?
If we assume that small states can be racially reformed, why should we assume that our reform efforts would be the only ones that would count? Antiwhites will be trying to reform pro-White states too. The smaller, the weaker, and the more hostile to each other that these successor states are, the greater the chances that antiwhites will have their way with them.
I think we should argue about how to make things pro-White and keep things pro-White, and we should not argue much about the right number and size of pro-White states that we don’t have.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.