The China QuestionNicholas R. Jeelvy
Nancy Pelosi’s flight landed in Taiwan on August 2 despite very loud and vigorous protests from the People’s Republic of China. For the time being, the Chinese have done little but whine impotently, rattle their sabers, and announce military exercises near and around Taiwan. They’ve declared a state of emergency in the coastal regions nearest to Taiwan, which is expected to last until August 7. Chinese sources are calling this the Fourth Taiwan Crisis.
Even pro-regime Chinese journalists are openly saying that if the Chinese Communist Party does nothing in response to this provocation by America, it loses face and should no longer have the loyalty of the Chinese nation. The Russian meme of “China’s final warning” has been circulating on the Internet, mocking Chinese inaction. China is further embarrassed by being, at least on paper, the stronger half of the Moscow-Peking axis, but doing nothing while weaker, poorer, Nigeria-with-snow Russia is ostensibly fighting the “fascist West” in Ukraine. So, America has put the heads of a state whose culture depends on maintaining face in a position where they either declare war or lose face. Ooooh, boy.
Any sort of tension between America and China is a major geopolitical event that cannot be ignored by white identitarian nationalists. Crisis is opportunity. A clash with China has the potential to weaken the ruling regime. It also has potential to strengthen it. After all, power is a resource which increases when used. The Biden administration successfully humiliating China and getting away with it would be a major foreign policy victory, increasing its internal legitimacy not only publicly, but also to stakeholders within the American governance structure. On the other hand, the Chinese could take the bluff and give the US military its first real test in decades. Or, they could simply be blown out of the water by combined US-Taiwanese and possibly Japanese forces, and left seething on China’s shores. While China’s army is gigantic, its navy is barely capable of coastal defense. Taking Taiwan would mean a state which is civilizationally hydrophobic (China has never had serious naval commitments) mounting an amphibious landing on a hostile shore, in contested seas, and under contested airspace against the greatest thalassocracy the world has ever seen. Behemoth swimming out to meet Leviathan in the sea: If Dugin were dead, he’d be turning in his grave.
Since crisis is opportunity, the opposition in the West, mostly gathered under the umbrella of MAGA and allied organizations, has been accusing the ruling regime of being irresponsible and needlessly provoking China. The gamble there is that the war-weary population of America and its allied states will flock to the banner of such opposition figures if they condemn escalation of hostilities with China. Others, having been radicalized and believing that the regime is their greatest enemy (which is true, incidentally) are openly cheering for China in the hopes that an embarrassment for the Biden administration or an all-out war will lead to destabilization and opportunity for them. Many times, this plays into the very well-developed — one might say overdeveloped — thanatic impulse of the online Dissident Right. Other times it’s messiah complex. With Donald Trump having failed and turned to pure grifting, and with Putin’s Russia being consistently shown as both anti-white and incapable of posing a serious threat to the West, the hopium addicts have turned yellowed sclerae towards glorious Chairman Xi, who’ll karate-chop the gay unipolar world order, et cetera.
In any case, there are good and bad reasons to be skeptical of escalation with China. I’m going to go against the dissident grain here, however, and give some reasons why conflict with China is not only inevitable, but could also improve the situation of white people in the world.
For starters, let me dispel a common myth. The idea is that China is not imperialistic because it hasn’t expanded outside of its own borders historically, outside of perhaps treating the kingdoms of Korea and Vietnam like vassal states. Indeed, a common trope of dissident discourse regarding China is that the only time they had a foreign intervention was in Vietnam (just after America withdrew) — and lost to the Vietnamese. This historical trend is often used as evidence that China does not constitute an imperial threat against anybody, least of all white people.
To this I’ll respond that a casual look at the map will tell us that Chinese expansion is only checked by natural and political obstacles. To the east, China is bounded by the Pacific and its littoral seas; to the West, by impassable mountain ranges and bone-dry deserts; to the south by dense jungle and more mountains; and to the north by the harsh steppe and its transition into tundra. Even its small border with Korea is mountainous and marked by the Yalu River. Furthermore, the notion that China does not practice imperialism would come as news to Tibetans and Uyghurs. Tibet was an independent state until the 1950s, when it was annexed by China. While it is true that the kingdoms of the Tibetan plateau historically had links with China, and had often been vassals of China, the same thing can be said of Korea and Vietnam and yet we do not consider it right and proper that China should invade, subjugate, and assimilate Korea and Vietnam. Indeed, the Chinese invasion of Vietnam is rightfully considered to be an imperial venture.
Historically, China has expanded until it overstretched its supply lines or ran into something as impassable as the Himalayas. It would then retrench and begin the process of assimilating the newly-conquered lands and peoples. Some areas and peoples would become part of China not by being conquered, but ironically by conquering it and then losing their own elite, who were then the rulers of China, to sinnicization from the bottom. This famously happened to Kublai Khan and his descendants, and more recently to China’s Manchurian rulers of the Qing dynasty, leading to parts of Mongolia and all of Manchuria being absorbed into China and rapidly being sinnicized. However, this sinnicization has given China plausible deniability for its imperialism. Yes, it expanded outwards, conquered peoples, or was conquered by peoples, but it absorbed them all into the umbrella-ethnicity of Han and declared their lands eternal and inviolate Chinese land, so it never in fact expanded. All those conflicts were in fact a form of self-defense.
I’m not faulting China for this, of course. States and civilizations expand until they find a barrier. The West is far more expansionist than China ever was and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Good and bad are wrong terms to use in the context of geopolitics. Morality presupposes an authority to instantiate and moderate it. Between states of the same civilization, morality can exist because it flows from the same civilizational presuppositions about the world, usually expressed in religious terms. So, we can speak of China treating Korea immorally within the context of the Confucian ethic, or France being gallant in its dealings with Germany within the context of the West’s Christian and post-Christian ethic. Obviously, this is not always the case, but it is never the case between states of civilizations alien to each other. In fact, the very idea of a single moral system for the whole world is precisely what we mean by globalism, universalism, and all of those nasty things we tend to oppose on the Right.
Further, even if China had historically not been an imperial power, there’s nothing to stop it if there is no opposition to it. States are water; they flow until they are stopped. More often than not, what stops them are other states. Japan was isolationist for 260 years under the Tokugawa Shogunate and then exploded violently outward after the Meiji Restoration, humiliating Russia in the Russo-Japanese War, conquering Korea, Manchuria, and Northern China, and then it finally attacked the Western powers and their colonies in the East in an effort to control the Asian part of the Pacific Rim, including Australia and New Zealand. The much-vaunted honorary Aryans planned to subjugate or exterminate the white people of Australia and Asia. Disastrous though the 1939-1945 conflict may have been for the white race in other theaters, in the Pacific theatre it was very explicitly a race war between the Japanese on one hand and the Americans, British, Australians, New Zealanders, and Dutch on the other. Or, to quote Francis Parker Yockey in The Enemy of Europe:
The third of these wars was related to the second: the American war against Japan, like the European war against Russia, was a war of the West against the outer revolt. In this war, America’s role was that of a Western colony, and its victory over Japan was also a victory for Europe, just as a victory of Europe over Russia would have been a victory also for America.
Some of Yockey’s terms seem a little jargonistic to the newcomer, so a mini-glossary: The “third war” refers to the three organically distinct conflicts that made up the Second World War, the first being an intra-European conflict between England and Germany, masking an ideological conflict between capitalism and National Socialism; the second being a war of the European Imperium led by Germany against Russia in its function as the leader of the Outer Revolt — i.e. the coalition of non-white peoples resenting white dominion over the world and fighting against it; and the third being a less grand version of the same conflict in which European America attempted to subjugate non-white Japan and beat back the Outer Revolt in East Asia.
Again, we may quote Yockey on the conclusion of this theater of war:
The extent to which the military victory of the Washington régime over Japan was also a political victory for all of Western Civilization over Japan is thus very slight. The American policy of rebuilding Japan undermined the greater part of the victory. America’s abandonment of China and Manchuria to Russia, leader of the outer revolt against Western Civilization, undermined it even further. The last remaining step, the restoration of Japanese sovereignty, is only a matter of time, for in this domain the initiative lies with Japan. The outer revolt against the West was only locally contained by America’s military victory. But in all other parts of the Far East, the revolts were successful. The Chinese, Malays, Indonesians, and the natives of the Philippines drove all their Western masters from positions of control.
In the metapolitical sense, Western Civilization lost the War against Japan, despite the local and nakedly military victory of the Americans.
With the defeat of the Japanese Empire, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) took its place as the preeminent power of the yellow race and the primary challenge to Western supremacy in East Asia. Of course, this did not come about naturally. Beginning with the treasons and espionage within the American government which allowed Mao’s Communists to triumph over the eminently more controllable Chang Kai-Shek, it concluded with the strategy developed by Henry Kissinger and implemented by a wing of the American Deep State to break relations with the Republic of China on the island of Taiwan and prop up the PRC as a counterweight to the Soviet Union. Billions in American and Western investment went into China, allowing it to industrialize on a scale that Mao never dreamed of, all to poke the Soviets in the eye. And now America faces off against this paper tiger with nuclear teeth of its own making.
Even Russia, China’s ostensible friend, doesn’t feel comfortable with their new senior partners. With the loss of the European energy markets due to sanctions in the wake of the Russo-Ukrainian War, the Russians can either sell their crude and gas to China at discount prices or pound sand, as it is popularly described by people on the Internet, all while ethnic Russians are being demographically displaced by Chinese in the Russian Far East.
One of my biggest points of disagreement with Yockey in The Enemy of Europe is his description of Russians as Mongol savages. It leads to wrongheaded analysis on his part and wrong conclusions. When we look at the problems with modern and historic Russia, they are typically white people problems, i.e. the valuing of moral communities above communities of kin. Indeed, the problem of Russians considering an ethnic Tatar, Chechen, or even Nigerian as their kin, insofar as he is Orthodox and speaks Russian, while rejecting their actual racial kin in Europe as “heretics and Satanists” sounds like a very European problem to have. The Russian expansion into Siberia and the steppe, as well as its subjugation of northern China during the Century of Humiliation, can be understood as a Western subjugation of non-whites, but for us to accept that, we need to understand that Russians are white.
Nevertheless, the concept of the Outer Revolt, and crucially, the resentment against white domination that motivates it is very useful. The Century of Humiliation is itself a propaganda term which the Chinese Communist Party uses to gin up anti-Western sentiment, and indeed, we must not underestimate the degree to which Chinese policy is guided by this sense of humiliation and a thirst for reassertion of their national pride. The CCP, in part, has the loyalty and cooperation of the Chinese population, the Mandate of Heaven if you will, because it has promised an end to this humiliation and revenge for it. Having ensured the West’s retreat from Hong Kong and Macau, Taiwan is now the last in the string of pearls, the final bastion of white barbarians in China proper. After Taiwan is secured, China will have to renegotiate the positions of Vietnam and Korea within the Chinese-led order. These countries have historically been Chinese vassals and are part of the Confucian/post-Confucian civilization led by them. The last battle will be Japan, the ancient enemy, and China’s only real rival within the Confucian civilizational space. After that, the righting of wrongs stage will be over and the revenge stage will begin.
In China’s cartoonish proclamations that they’re numba one, we see their fundamental civilizational insecurity. Sure, they are The Middle Kingdom, but they were also trod underfoot by the blue-eyed beasts from beyond the sea for more than a hundred years. The Chinese both resent and hero-worship the West, building life-sized replicas of Western cities and poisoning themselves with milk, even though they have no lactose tolerance, just to show that they can be like us. They resent us completely — not only our civilizational achievements, but also, on a much pettier level, our tolerance for milk and alcohol, our large bodies and great physical strength, our height, our long faces and facial hair, and the fact that we engender lust in their women while they themselves only inspire contempt in white women. Given the chance, they’d kill us all.
It used to be common sense that all political parties and movements in a country could agree on that country’s long-term strategic interests. For example, it would be uncontroversial that no matter who was the Prime Minister of Sweden, the country’s neutrality has to be respected and that will be the geopolitical orientation of Sweden, come hell or high water. Nowadays, however, public trust in the West is so eroded that cheering victory or defeat in a civilizational clash is contingent on one’s political belonging. And so, we have white men hoping that God-Emperor Xi will destroy the West and liberate them from the tranny regime. We have ostensible China hawk Donald Trump throwing a wet blanket over Pelosi’s high-stakes gamble in Taipei, suddenly worried about escalation. It’s all very entertaining, but let me offer a modest proposal.
White identitarians and nationalists should seek to make China a friend to the West — by that, I mean the kind of friend that Japan has become to the West: a nice, friendly country which makes affordable cars, high-quality electronics, and produces the best cartoons on the planet. A peaceful country which will not even dare think to rise up against the white man ever again, content to amaze the West with its culture, its exquisite cuisine, and its business practices, descended as they are from the samurai code of honor. We eat sushi and tayaki, we bask in Bashõ’s quiet splendor, we enjoy the Japan-Western syncretist work of Akira Kurosawa and Hayao Miyazaki, and even indulge our morbid fascination with the weird side of Japanese culture: the tentacle stuff, the panty-vending machines, and Yukio Mishima. But Zero fighter planes now exist only in memories and media. As evident from the media they produce, the Japanese view Americans and white people in general as blonde six-footers covered in muscle and driven by an unstoppable will. For all the bluster leading up to 1945, and for all their valor, actual and imagined, they are now completely cowed and docile. And that is what China ought to become. A peaceful, grass-eating, hero-worshipping friend of the West. Just imagine the syncretic art we can beat out of them. Shanghai Jazz is only the beginning.
What is necessary in the long term is a subjugation of China and a shattering of their dreams for revenge. Having wrested from the Soviet Union the title of Leader of the Outer Revolt, they are now the greatest civilizational threat to white people and are fueled by dangerous levels of resentment against us. This is and will remain true regardless of who holds power in the West. Supporting China in any conflagration between China and a Western country, or a Western vassal state such as Japan or South Korea, is therefore a big no-no. As dissidents, we should also be aware that we’re always in danger of being co-opted by imperial rivals to the Washington regime, foremost amongst them Moscow and Peking. A strong and unstinting policy of “China is asshoe” guards vigorously against the danger of Chinese cooption, much as how robust anti-Semitism guards against Jewish infiltration. The optics of supporting China are also horrible, especially for people who purport to be pro-white. Any white identitarian cannot possibly support racial outsiders in a white-on-yellow conflict and would lose credibility as the result of such a position.
Of course, seeing as how we are Western dissidents, we shall nevertheless use any weakness that accrues to its ruling elite as a result of conflict with China to further our own political prospects. This means undermining and sabotaging the regime’s credibility and legitimacy. But a careful balance must be struck: China must not be allowed to break the fences that have cut it off from the Pacific Ocean, and under no circumstance must it be allowed to encroach anywhere near white homelands. Chinese immigration into and infiltration of Australia, New Zealand, and Canada in particular is dangerous and must be stopped. Parallel to hurting the regime, we must also use this crisis to remind white people that yes, the Chinese are racial outsiders and enemies, and no, the existence of subjugated and friendly Asians (Japanese, Koreans, Taiwan Chinese) does not negate the fact that the bulk of the Asian biomass is arrayed against the West and its preeminence in the world.
The ZOG regime will try inasmuch as possible to depict this conflict as being one of democracy versus authoritarianism, and liberty versus despotism. We must, however, deconstruct that narrative and impose our own. White vs. Yellow. Aristocratic egalitarianism vs. Oriental despotism. Smiling, heroic Aryan warriors vs. faceless Asiatic hordes. This will not only delegitimize the regime by exposing its hypocrisy, but also awaken people in the West as to the fundamentally racial and ethnic nature of conflict — not just this conflict, but every conflict on the planet.
Above all, dissidents must not allow themselves to be suckered into carrying water for either side of this conflict. If you’re part of the US Navy, unless you’re a commander who can win fame and then convert it into political success, you probably have no business being anywhere near the theater of operations. If you’re in a country other than the United States, you probably want to steer clear of this whole bullshit. This is not Ukraine; there’s no cause for white solidarity. I care about Taiwan only insofar as they can make computer chips and be used as a promontory from which the West can launch attacks against China. Save your powder and your strength for our struggle back home, where we seek to reassert white control over white countries.
Ideally, the Washington regime breaks China’s back, but is so weakened that we can simply sweep it aside and take our rightful position as leaders of our respective countries in the West. The real world is rarely ideal, so we’ll probably have to do some vigorous fighting back home first before the West rides out in force once again — this time to inflict ten thousand years of humiliation on the Pompously Prideful Han.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “Paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
- Third, Paywall members have the ability to edit their comments.
- Fourth, Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
- Fifth, Paywall members will have access to the Counter-Currents Telegram group.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
Paywall Gift Subscriptions
If you are already behind the paywall and want to share the benefits, Counter-Currents also offers paywall gift subscriptions. We need just five things from you:
- your payment
- the recipient’s name
- the recipient’s email address
- your name
- your email address
To register, just fill out this form and we will walk you through the payment and registration process. There are a number of different payment options.
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 528 Karl Thorburn on the Bank Crashes
The State of the Nation for White Advocates
Why The Prisoner Still Matters
The Worst Week Yet: March 12-18, 2023
Obituary for Prof. Roger Pearson, M.Sc. (Econ.), Ph.D., (London): 1927–2023
The Estonian Election & Nationalist Strategy
Do You Have What It Takes to be a Dissident?
Dr. Roger Pearson on His Life & Work
I would like to know why this site has the tendency to present Russians as non-whites when this is not true.
You obviously did not read the article. TRS creature, go home.
Russians are white, as Northern Caucasians, and Ukrainians, and Anatolian Türks, and Qazan Tatars and many other Northern Euroasians, etc. are, but they are not Europeans and do not belong to the European Civilisation (“Kulturkreis”).
Is that really true? What is “European”? I would say that, in a racio-civilizational sense, it consists of those who are a) biologically white, and b) Christian, or ancestrally so. I’ve known a number of Russians and Russo-Americans in my life (and a few “Russian” Jews), and they looked as white as Dr. Johnson (indeed, they were far “whiter” in a Hitlerian sense than many French and Irish, let alone Italians and Greeks, I’ve come across). Given that they were also either Christians or had Christian forebears, and exhibited the same modal mental traits as myself and other obvious whites, why would they not be classified as “European”?
Our racial numbers are fast dwindling, and our people across what I call “Magna Europa” are further sorting themselves out ideologically (at bottom, psychologically) into pro- and antiwhite political affiliations. White preservationists therefore cannot afford to be too choosy as to whom we admit to our tribal ranks.
White preservationists therefore cannot afford to be too choosy as to whom we admit to our tribal ranks.
There is nothing here about being too picky. The majority of Russians do not consider themselves Europeans. They also don’t like it when Europeans think they are Europeans or call them so. They consider Europeans both degenerate and hostile, and neither of these claims is at all unfounded. The words Gayrope and Jewrope are popular there, as in other post-Soviet countries. And these views do not come from above, they are not imposed by the state. They come from below, from the depths of the people, from grass-roots, and the state is only forced to pick up these positions, since it is populist and has to adapt to the spirit of the electorate. The allegedly European concepts of freedom, democracy, human rights, tolerance etc. are considered as Jewish, Free-masonic, subvertive and anti-Russian. Non-Russian peoples share those positions too, however some of them consider the Russians as exploiters and oppressors of non-Russian peopeles, but at the service of European/Western puppet-masters.
But back in 2000-2012, the Russian elite strenuously pretended to be Europeans, liberals and democrats, however the Russian people hated both this elite and Europeans, liberals and democrats in general. The experience of history has taught the Russians that if their rulers call themselves Europeans, and/or trying to Europeanize their subjects, then this only means further exploitation of the population in favor of both the elite and its European patrons. The so-called “RomanOFF” dynasty (German petty princes and princesses on the Russian throne) was only engaged in trading Russian raw materials, sending them to the West, and Russian cannon fodder for inter-European showdowns in conflicts very far from the interests of the peoples of Russia. Peter I, aka The Great, simply hated everything Russian and named the Russians “half-animals”. And he killed hunderts of thousands of them in his attempts to “Europeanize” Russia.
In the same way, the Bolsheviks staged an artificial famine in the 1930s, sending meat stolen from the Qazaqs, grain stolen from the Ukrainians and Cossacks, rice stolen from the Özbeks to the West, buying industrial enterprises there for the production of weapons. To have something in disposal to attack Germany – by order from London and Washington.
So the Russians know that they should not expect anything good from Europe and the West in general. The colonized non-Russian peoples of Russia, as well as all the countries of the post-Soviet space, also know this, except for those who were Europeans before the Russian-Bolshevik annexation (Balts, Western Ukrainians, Western Belarusians, Romanians of Moldova, Transcarpathian Ruthenians, etc.) In general, trying to convince Russians that they are Europeans, or even more so to convert them into Europeans, can only be done by force, and this is the same as a sex change operation. It is impossible for the best surgeon to make a full-fledged woman out of a man, and a full-fledged man out of a woman. Somethink alike it is here. You can get an artificially and superficially Europeanized elite, but the people will hate this elite, and with it they will hate Europe, the West, and the forced Europeanization in general.
The example of Ukraine shows what Europeanization imposed from the outside, by left-liberal bureaucrats from Brussels, leads to – part of the people support it, part of the people reject it, but as a result both of these parts suffer and no one benefits from it.
Great Austrian military scholar and geopolitician Heinrich Jordis Freiherr von Lohausen argued in his books Mut zur Macht and Reiten für Russland, that the real border between Europe and Asia is not on the Ural Mountains and not on the river Volga, or, as we call it, Edil. That border does not mean anything in cultural-civilisational sence. The real border is much nearer to the West and it is going from the Eastern borders of Baltic states, than along with the older Polish border (before annexations of 1939), along older Hungarian/Slovak/Romanian borders to the Bessarabia. What lies to the West of it is Europe, and what is to the East is not. Baron von Lohausen had big sympathy to Russians and other peoples of former Russian Empire, he saw the war of 1941-1945 as an attempt to liberate them of the cruel Bolshevik regime. But he still did not seen them as culturally Europeans. And also great American scholar Prof. Huntington saw the Russians and other as one distinct civilisation, not the Western one.
I really believe that there are Russians who see themselves as Europeans, but I think they belong to “intelligentsia”, and almost all “intelligentsia” in the former SU was alien, of not-Russian origin. And I believe, that many Russians sincerely wish all the best to the Europe and the West, that they want to trade with them and be on friendly conditions. Moreover, I think that many Anatolian Türks, or Azeri Türks, or Qazan Tatars, or Qirim Tatars, or Ukrainians, or Armenians, or Georgians, or Chechens and other Caucasians want to have good relations with the West and Europe. But anyway I think, that they do not want to drop their own identification and become Europeans or Westerners. They are white. They are not Europeans. They are to the East of Baron Lohausen´s and Prof. Huntington´s Line.
This is the sort of bottom-tier logic that leads people to think that the US attacking Iraq, Iran, or Syria is justified because it’s somehow allegedly pro-white. Neoconservatism dressed up as White Nationalism doesn’t belong at Counter-Currents.
The difference, in my eyes, is that US control over Japan and South Korea was established in a war of defense of White nations and possessions in the Asia-Pacific region, at a time when the governments of the West could still be called pro-White. Adventures in the Middle East today bear no relation to legitimate White interests– unless you consider Jews a part of that designation– but rather those of the global capitalist system.
This article is about China, however, not about Japan or Korea. Nevertheless, anyone who truly upholds “white nationalism” should be opposed to occupations. The war with Japan ended a long time ago, and there’s no real advantage to the real people of the US in continuing to oppose North Korea. It only serves the designs of the globalist elite. And the only reason North Korea poses any threat to the US is because of its continuing presence there.
The logic which holds that the US is a “white” country representing “white” interests — which in itself is an extremely dubious assertion, given that the people comprising the elites and groups determining American foreign policy haven’t been white in character, or in many cases even racially, for many years — and that therefore anything it does against a non-white country somehow benefits the entire “white” world is an oversimplification that would merely be silly if it weren’t so dangerous, since many Rightists really do think this way. The only difference between this line of thinking and that of the neocons is that the neocons substitute “democratic” for “white.”
Yes, I completely agree with what you have stated, and I regret that some in our circles are so enthusiastic about American regime power, not only in Europe but elsewhere. I sympathize with Iran, Syria, and Palestine, though they are not White Europeans. The grass is greener on the other side, I suppose. Once pro-White governments are established, the question of whether we should continue to seek the global supremacy which we have taken for granted for centuries will remain open. What is certain is that America (driven by a hostile and foreign elite) in the present is not militarily, economically, or spiritually fit to dominate the world as it continues to attempt to.
There might be reasons to feel sympathetic to some non-white countries or peoples in some situations, but in the end it’s not about sympathy, it’s about what’s best for us. And there isn’t a single government in Western Europe or North America that has the best interests of its “white” citizens at heart. Quite the opposite, in fact. So to act as a cheerleader for the very same people who are oppressing you is ridiculous. There is absolutely nothing positive that white Americans or Europeans have to gain as a result of America’s foreign policy agenda in Asia (or anywhere else). Whether one feels sympathetic towards China or not, a strong China, while certainly not “pro-white” by any stretch, helps because it counterbalances the ZOG countries in the US and Europe — and China also has a history of assisting countries in Europe that are trying to assert their illiberalism, such as Hungary. Moreover, as you referenced, the US is very actively engaged in oppressing Europe, so for Europeans to cheer on US foreign policy makes even less sense.
Praising American imperialism for me is akin to those people who are nostalgic for the British Empire and call for it to be restored (yes, there still are such people), to which I always respond that it might be better to decolonize the UK before you start thinking about Britain colonizing other countries again.
Good point. The regime got Whites riled up to fight “towel-heads”, etc. in Iraq in a war that had nothing to do with their interests. Probably doing the same here.
In addition to your points about the ethnic make-up of the regime’s leadership, you also have to factor in that Whites make up only about 45% of births. This is a different world from Yockey’s.
“So, America has put the heads of a state whose culture depends on maintaining face in a position where they either declare war or lose face.”
Several things to consider. First, Look at the U.S. leadership — line of succession — Biden, Harris, Pelosi — AKA senile old man, cackling moron, ex-sex-worker, and senile, alcoholic old woman. The Chinese bosses are younger, smarter and can see that things here are falling apart fast with negro worship and transgenderism priorities over border security and educating the next generation. So, second, they can take their time. Declaring war would be short-sighted, and unnecessary. Their strengths are technology and economics. They control huge amounts of the natural resources that lead to the production of high tech products like lithium batteries that power electric cars. So, third, I’m thinking that they will take their time and that pay-back for their humiliation is coming in the way of economic sanctions.
The war is unlikely given China’s strong dependency on fuel and food imports. Unlike Russians, they didn’t prepare themselves to weather the economic blowback.
As a committed minimalist and an enemy of the American Empire, I think we can all agree that PRC should be strong enough to check American power in the Pacific area. Enough to give a pause in a mad burning of white social capital in the West until there’s nothing to rebuild.
The Sassanid and Eastern Roman empires fought one another to such extent that when Arabian Mohammedans emerged from the Peninsula, they cut into their neighbors like a hot knife into butter. Before then they were considered backward savages unworthy of attention.
It’d be a shame if we fell to the same folly.
China’s strong dependency on fuel and food imports
Yes, and then Russia gives them fuel, and occupied part of Ukraine gives them food (stolen by Russians in the Southern regions).
That’s not enough. Under the current capacity of pipelines,Russia can fulfill approx. 1/3 of the Chinese demand for gas. As for food, I think at least 80% of soybean import comes from the US.
This insufficiency is even more visible in the oil market, the vast majority is imported by sea. Maybe a pipeline from Fars oil fields in Iran would change the balance, but the area around potential route is very unstable. The Taliban are still an unknown variable in future political configurations in the region.
Absolutely outstanding article. I’ve lately really come around to the opinion that conflicts with Russia and China are definitely proxy conflicts for White Racial interest. Russia’s anti Fascist rhetoric which you don’t really see in the West is risible but also dangerous. China is Russia’s closest Allie and thus White racial survival will only be through both Russia and China.
This comment makes zero sense to me.
China’s saber-rattling is equivalent to what the Manosphere calls a Shit Test. Since the corrupt hag paid a visit to Taiwan despite the empty ChiCom threats, the US government passed the Shit Test. It’s in the best interests of the ChiComs to let it go quietly, rather than continue to make fools of themselves. This much is a pretty minor development, so long as nobody continues getting froggy about it.
Other than that, one more Asian depiction of Americans:
Lots of people decry the Manosphere/PUA people, but the importance of passing shit tests and maintaining frame is widely applicable across magisteria, diplomacy included.
Very wrong about Chinese naval history. Taiwan was at one point a Dutch colony and fortress. The Chinese pirates of the time got a letter of marque from the Emperor, put together a new 1,000 vessel fleet and soundly defeated the Dutch interlopers. They sort of Zerg Rushed the place with all manner of small watercraft. They could shit down Taiwan. My suspicion is that they will send artillerists and infantry to Donbass.
They don’t want to spend any money or resources on the war in Ukraine. They see Russia as a shield against the West. The ideal situation for them is the West and Russia to destroy each other fighting. China allowed all kinds of pro-Ukrainian propaganda to spread on WeChat and other platforms for months all while officially stating there should be no criticism of Russia’s war on Ukraine. They deliberately let anti-war propaganda spread because they don’t want to commit anything in helping Russia because at the end of the day Russia to them is just another white devil country with beautiful women they economically exploit.
Yes, I also thought that the statement about Chinese inexperience in naval matters was poorly thought out. I have an unfortunate tendency to read and quickly continue in agreement without thinking, but I gave some consideration to this particular assertion. China has projected power over the sea for millenia. Consider the Chinese diaspora around the Spice Islands, the expedition of Zheng He, and so on — not to mention the Grand Canal and riverine trade, and the history of maritime piracy as you stated.
However, these are of little relevance. and ultimately Jeelvy’s assertion has proven ‘accidentally correct’. China has retained a strong fishing industry, but naval power has been sorely lacking for the last few centuries. A rapid buildup, which we are witnessing, will be necessary if China is to project power and take advantage of the coming storm.
China has pushed emigrants and ships outwards and into the sea, but it has never functioned as a thalassocracy the way Athens, Carthage, England, Portugal, the Netherlands or America have. It is civilizationally land-bound and will remain so.
Riverine transport is also not a good indicator of sea legs. Russia also depends on river barges for its internal supply chain, but it remains primarily a land power, although less hydrophobic than China.
If Xi were to take Taiwan, he would be greater than Mao. As it is, he is not in the same league as The Great Helmsman. By seeking a third term, he is intimating his interest in at least joining that league. But Taiwan is a unique challenge for the CCP. It is not Hong Kong and its acquisition could not be carried out through indirect means, as Hong Kong was assumed gradually over decades and then all at once through the corona distraction. This may be Red China’s “go big or go home” moment.
I don’t know about this. I hear China is integrating Taiwan economically and ultimately people will always go with money. Enough economic incentives and they will integrate gradually, first with a puppet government to save face, then as a quasi-independent province, and then formal integration. China is making big inroads in the semiconductor industry, including poaching key talent. The Kuomintang support re-integration, right? The West sees this happening and that explains the stunt — to deepen the rift. China will play the long game seeking peaceful re-integration or wait until they have an overwhelming economic and military advantage over the West. Meanwhile, they have already retaliated by blocking planned projects with the West and will broadcast that domestically to save face.
Furthermore, the notion that China does not practice imperialism would come as news to Tibetans and Uyghurs.
And to Qazaqs too. Sherqi Türkistan/Eastern Türkestan is populated not only by Uyghurs, but by Qazaqs, Tajiks and Özbeks too. One of the great fighters against the Chinese imperialism in Eastern Türkestan/Kashgaristan was Qazaq Ospan Batyr also known as Osman Islambay-Uly Batur.
The Russian meme of “China’s final warning”
That´s the old Chinese meme, since the times of Vietnam War, when Mao Zedong again and again threatened Americans, that the Chinese would militarily intervene in Vietnam on the side of Hanoi regime. (The Vietnamese hate the Chinese since Bronze Age, as imperialists and oppressors).
The enemies inside our walls are far more dangerous than those outside. And we may pontificate about Chinese resentment against whites all we want, but it can hardly be as deadly and as direct as the hatred of our present foreign occupation government for us.
In the war with Russia I can sympathize with nationalists who choose the side of our occupiers, because that seems to be the side of the Ukrainians too. But in a conflict with China, why choose the side of the occupation government?
Grand theories about a far-off clash of civilizations should not detract our attention from the fact that any military operation of our current regime will be against the interests of whites, and in favour of our occupiers.
The author’s theorizing reminds me of the grand neo-con theories about a civilizational conflict between ‘the West’ and the Muslim world, that were in fact meant to benefit Israel. The suggestion that the Chinese want to exterminate whites (because whites take all their women, or some penis envy) seems quite outlandish. It reminds me of certain theories about a secret imam in Iran that is supposed to have a plan to initiate Armageddon by a nuclear attack on Israel (so in order to have peace we must annihilate Iran…).
In our present circumstances a crushing defeat of the occupation government can only be cause for great joy. How would it help white nationalists? That may not be clear yet, but under pressure everything becomes fluid. On the other hand a victory for the Empire will certainly mean a strengthening of the power of our deadliest enemies.
Anyway, China was wise not to act impulsively on the American provocation, but it will not forget. And each day China grows stronger and the occupied West grows weaker. Of course we should not give up hope that whites can wrestle the reigns of power from the occupiers, and then the calculation becomes completely different. But until then anything that weakens the regime is to be welcomed with open arms.
Well said! I enjoy Mr. Jeelvy’s writing but the way he has framed the current geopolitical conflict in White vs Yellow is completely inaccurate. The American regime is the very opposite of White interest, regardless of thr glorious white history of the country.
If you would forgive my candor, you are both wrong by being shortsighted and/or ignorant. The Chinese Menace is real and palpable, only not that if you are turning your heads away. The Chinese are not hating or wishing ill of the White race because of some petty “beautiful women” or “penis envy” issues as you suggested, but because they are harboring a grand scheme of ultimate ambition that is nothing short of global conquest and domination for which the White race poses the biggest obstacle in their eyes. The occupation regimes of the West are indeed bad and dangerous to White racial survival and prosperity, but for now at least they are not openly executing White people en masse. But if the White Western homelands fell into the Chinese hand, which is the goal China is actively plotting and striving for, White race per se would be instantly driven into perdition. No exaggerations used.
What is the point of this article? I’m getting more and more confused by the day on some of these. On a recent podcast Greg sounded like he was changing his mind on Ukraine, which was a pleasant surprise and it had nothing to do with Ukraine or Russia, which has been the point of this conflict all along. It is the corruption of NATO/EU in general, not because Russia and Putin are so great. I support Russia and China as catalysts currently absent in the West to challenge the NWO, not because I want them to become our new overlords, which will never happen anyway and not what even they want to happen. That is a child’s level of understanding for Current Year geopolitics. It’s not that those of us who support ‘ZOG East’ and ‘Jewtin’ hate Ukrainians. It’s that they just aren’t very important compared to the bigger picture and they are victimizing themselves by participating on the wrong side rather than negotiating a realistic solution. So Nick, I’m very confused what you’re arguing here. We should take the side of Pelosi and the neoliberals/neocons to save the globalist footprint of the crumbling American Empire? Why? How is this helping white people by keeping Chinese territory from Chinese people?
I have not changed my position on the Ukraine war. Putin was wrong to invade a sovereign nation. But it is increasingly clear that it wasn’t just a crime, it was a serious mistake that the US may have baited him into making on the knowledge that the Russian military is far weaker than most people expected and the hope that a military debacle might lead to Putin’s downfall.
My point almost exactly. These stupid divisions in our movement really make the narcissism-of-small-differences a true statement. But even if you haven’t changed your mind you still sound awfully conflicted on it because it is an evocative, internecine war we haven’t seen since 1945. If Russia was baited into invading Ukraine, then they aren’t wrong but acting defensively because it was an inevitable conflict that would have occurred somewhere at some point, and the longer Putin waited the greater the advantage would tilt towards evermore Eastern encroachment of NATO/EU (like it has since 1991) and this war could have eventually taken place in Sochi (via Georgia since 2008), or more likely through Kazakhstan into Siberia and Tatarstan, which they tried to do just 6 weeks before the invasion in a failed color revolution. They tried it with Belarus too in 2020-21, and Belarus retaliated by vectoring Third World migrants as a form of biowarfare. All sides have known this war was coming since 1991, and possibly since even glasnost/perestroika. It’s why Russia never gave up Transnistria or the North Caucasus despite the costly insurgencies it yielded, and it appears to have finally paid off. And of course it is turning into Russian imperialism now because they already invested so heavily in this conflict that there is no turning back, especially as they have gained the upper hand, which they had all along, notwithstanding powerful NATO propaganda, and they are signaling they might as well finish off their post-Cold War revanchist itinerary while they have the chance. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter that Zelensky isn’t Ukrainian or that Chechens aren’t Russian. Nor does the ‘antifascist’ or neoliberal rhetoric. This East Slavic fratricide predates any of these secondary characteristics, just like the origins of the Arab Spring predates the Mossad who engineered it. All of these manifestations are contoured to the Current Year zeitgeist rather than entirely caused by it.
You are taking Russian claims of self-defense at face value, when this has always been about Russian imperialism. Russia created the largest land empire in world history and claims to have been forced to do so in self-defense. It is laughable.
Yes, and all peoples in this multinational empire joined Russians freely and voluntarily. Russians everyday criticize White Europeans for colonization of Africa and Americas, whines for poor Indians, but never remembered the peoples, genocided by Russians themselves, starting with Slavs (Novgorod in 9th and again in 16th centuries, Drevlyane/Iskorosten Slavs in the 10th century), and then almost all peoples of Steppe, Caucasus, Edil-Ural, Siberia, Far East, Central Asia, Far North. The Russians always say that Americans deliberately infested the Amerindians with “smallpox blankets”, but never say, that only in 17th century 60% of Sakhalar (“Yakuts”) have died of pandemic illnesses, brought by Russians to them. They remember now and again the “Indian Wars” in America, but never say a word aboit the genocide in the Caucasus, the massacre of Nogays by Suvorov (Topal-Pasha or Askak, the Lame) in 1783, the massacres and deportations of Cherkessians, Adygs, Chechenians and other Caucasian peoples, both under Czars and Bolsheviks. And the man-made famines of 1930´s, such as Asharshylyk in QZ or Holodomor in UA, now are described in RU as very overrated and not deliberately caused processes, “used by Qazaq and Ukrainian nationalists in their anti-Russian efforts with the propaganda support of the CIA and other Western “Russophobians””.
America has created the largest sphere of military control in history and claims to do so on a basis of voluntary invitation by host nations and mutual defense, while openly discussing regime change and the dissolution of Russia.
Interestingly enough, with the arguable exception of West Germany, all the members of NATO joined voluntarily rather than by conquest.
Russia’s laughable performance in their war of aggression is strong evidence that Russia is a militarily very weak country and China probably is as well. Ukraine will end the war by liberating Crimea and the so called LNR and DNR Russian puppet states at a minimum. Taiwan could likely hold their own against China and perhaps even take back Hong Kong in the event of open conflict. In short these wars carry very little risk and lots of benefits for White racial interest.
I think it is absurd that Taiwan could beat the PRC.
I am not so confident as you in Ukraine. The Ukraine war could last a very long time. I don’t think that Russia will simply be ejected short of a collapse of Putin’s regime. If Putin feels that is possible, I think he will declare victory and go home, basically holding on to Crimea and the puppet states.
The Chinese military is even weaker than the Russian military and with a minimal amount of Western aid Taiwan could foil any attempt at annexation from China. The logistics of invading Taiwan are even more complicated than logistics of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine so if China could be baited into a misadventure in Taiwan it would weaken the Eurasianist anti White bloc immensely. Doubly so given that Russia will come out of its defeat in Ukraine with much reduced international stature. Ukraine liberating the occupied territories which include Crimea is not far fetched at all, the Russians are stalled on every front and steadily losing ground in the Kherson direction. In a case of agreeing with our corrupt rulers for the wrong reasons we need to maintain the pressure on our governments to provide Ukraine with all the necessary weapons and funding it needs to fight the Russian aggression. They just need the required support and they will be in Sevastopol, Lugansk and Donetsk this time next year. The Ukrainian vanguard nationalist will come out with vastly enhanced stature and influence and that will be a resounding victory for our people and firm step in the direction of European immanterium.
I do not see how one would come to the conclusion, as you have, that we are supposed to doubt every part of the official line except the war propaganda about Ukraine. Military conquest by Ukraine of the LPR, DNR and Crimea– or the recapturing of any significant and defended territory, would require superior artillery, mobility in the form of tanks and armored vehicles, and air power, or an outstretched, unsupplied enemy, as we saw in the first months of the war. The supposed Kherson offensive is imaginary, it is impossible, Ukraine is subjected to massive barrages daily at all points along the front. I cannot imagine a more unrealistic idea of the war in Ukraine, I cannot say that Kiev government conquest of Crimea would qualify as ‘liberation’, and I continually fail to realize the benefit that prolonging this war will have for White people in the West (Or in Ukraine).
But surely you can see how such a position can cause confusion and even frustration with some of your followers.
Two basic points that the, so called, ‘pro-Russian'(but in reality, also pro-Ukrainian) side makes are:
-The U.S. deliberately provoked the war.
-There is no good reason to take the stated war aims about liberating the occupied territories literally. The U.S. objectives of ‘weakening’, ‘isolating’, ‘bleeding’, ‘extending’ Russia are being served just as good, or even better, by Ukraine losing more territory as the war drags on.
By you saying:
“The US knew this war was on the way, but refused to give Zelensky a flat “no” on NATO, which meant the US wanted it happen. Why? Surely because they had good reason to think that the Russian army was not up to the job. […] I think they believed there is a good chance that a failure in Ukraine could lead to regime change in Russia.”
“[The invasion] was a serious mistake that the US may have baited him [Putin] into making on the knowledge that the Russian military is far weaker than most people expected and the hope that a military debacle might lead to Putin’s downfall.”
“I am not so confident as you in Ukraine. The Ukraine war could last a very long time. I don’t think that Russia will simply be ejected short of a collapse of Putin’s regime.”
You seem to accept the first point and the second is only one cynical step away from believing that the U.S. really was expecting the Russian military and economy to collapse within a couple of weeks but had miscalculated.
So in a fundamental way you do not belong in the systemic pro-(in reality anti-)Ukraine camp, thus the confusion.
subjugated and friendly Asians
Yes, friendly Aians, but only temporarily. I remember, that in the movie Conan the Destroyer there was a Japanese as a positive figure, magician on the “good” side of Conan. But that is just alike a “house negro”. The Japanese have not forgotten anything, incl. Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and they just wait for the best moment. Revilo Oliver has so good explained it in his Yellow Peril.
Sorry for my criticizing and correcting your point, but you are so wrong on your poorly-informed or cynical perception of the Japanese collective national mindset. The Japanese have little bitterness lingering in their minds as regards Hiroshima and Nagasaki against America. I cannot say it’s completely none-existent, but the spite and rancor were nowhere to be discerned. The Japanese national co-regions i.e. Shintoism and Buddhism as well as the essence of Bushido all mandate that enemies, domestic or foreign, should not forever be held in grudge, much less be met with a revengeful mind, once the dusts have settled.
“Past resentment or hatred should be flowed away like water”, as the saying goes. During my extensive travel in Japan and many intimate and even privy and confidential conversations with Japanese from all walks of life including avid Japanese nationalists, no one professed any hatred or a hint of revenge against America. “It was a huge tragedy. Americans did something extreme and diabolical, but that was in a war. Bygones should be bygones, and we only wish a permanent friendship and mutual understanding between Japan and America based on correct historical views. We as Japanese only request America to offer us a formal apology when the post-WWII mainstream historical view is finally put to rest after the White nationalist forces succeed in obtaining political power in US.” is what they told me. I guess it is this sincerity and generosity that distinguish the Japanese from the Chinese and Koreans as a people.
Not even the Vietnamese maintain resentment over what they call the “American War.” Of course China is expansionist like any civilization, but they’re motivated by the same factor as others, namely profit and power. I don’t see them in 2060 going on a crusade against what used to be the White world to avenge the Opium years of 200 years ago. Besides they’re checked by other powerful states, i.e. India, Japan, Vietnam, Russia.
Indian elite migration is a far bigger threat. The amount of Indian tech workers in government agencies and major corps is shocking.
I think we should be supporting ethnic irredentism/separatism wherever it lay regardless of politics, economics or ethnicity. That means uniting all Russians, Hungarians, Serbs, Germans, Albanians etc into their own Sprachräume etc and detaching the rest like Scotland, Catalonia, Flanders, Corsica etc. This is the only means that has ever maintained peace without these haphazard alliances that have killed so many of our people. But right now it is also a catalyzing entropy with an invaluable slipstream that gives us room to maneuver against the NWO while it is preoccupied, even if it is also a tragedy that none of us can control aside from capitalizing on NWO complacency.
I have recently determined that the last such catalyst was Bavarian nationalism rather than later revanchism or lebensraum because it was the direct link between WWI and WWII. This separatist hotbed was the main theater of operations between Marxism and Nazism. Both of these schools of thought knew where to be headquartered within tumultuous Germany. Die Juden knew it was the weakest link in the Prussian writ, and so it stabbed it in the back towards the end of the WWI, and the NSDAP knew it was a revolutionary flashpoint from where to begin its ‘remnant’ building blocks, later championed by Albert Jay Nock. The NWO will only collapse with a Trotskyist-like ubiquitous separatism/irredentism from Quebec to South Tyrol, Galicia, Walloonia, Northern Ireland, Brittany, Wales and even Kurdistan. It would be totally unprepared for this sudden rearrangement.
(China has never had serious naval commitments)
Historically seen the word never is wrong. The story of Zheng He, the great Chinese (of Türkic and Muslim origin, but still Chinese) seafarer and explorer of the early 15th century shows it.
The real power of today´s Maoist fleet could be proved only in the real war, and I do not think that this war would be easy for Americans or the National Chinese. But I have read The Rise of China vs. the Logic of Strategy by Edward Luttwak. Dr. Luttwak writes, that Chinese military buildup and assertive foreign policy have already stirred up resistance among its neighbors, just three of whom―India, Japan, and Vietnam―together exceed China in population and wealth. Unless China’s leaders check their own ambitions, a host of countries, which are already forming tacit military coalitions, will start to impose economic restrictions as well. So I hope that in the case of such war: a) many other states, which feel threatened by ChinCom will support American/National Chinese efforts and b) the national-liberation movements of oppressed peoples, such as Tibetans, Uyghurs, Qazaqs, Mongols and others would be supported and could liberate their occupied lands. (All territories to the North of the Great Wall are historically not China, but Qat(h)ay, the lands of Altaic peoples, both Türkic and Mongolian, such as Qarakitaylar/Kara Kitad, Kara Kidanlar and other variations. The land-name Kitay, as the China is known for Slavs, Qazaqs and some other peoples, refers to those Türkic and Mongolian Northern and Western territories, and not to Han China, which lied much further to the South.)
Behemoth swimming out to meet Leviathan in the sea: If Dugin were dead, he’d be turning in his grave.
No, he would not. Because Dugin has seen Red China as sea civilisation, i.e. talassocraty too. At least so it was written in his Geopolitics in ´99 edition. And he is right here, because the real China is on the coasts, and also in the West and South of the country. The “continental” (heartland) northern and western parts are Altaic, Tibetan and Mancurian, i.e. not originally Chinese, but occupied by the Chinese.
I think one of biggest blunders of Stalin was that he has betrayed the Eastern Türkestan Republic and sold Uyghurs and Qazaqs to Mao Zedong. (Beriya, really a great, maybe even the greatest statesman of those times, was strongly against such decision, but Stalin has had more powers.) That was one of confirmations of idiotic ideology of Panslavism, which has infested Bolsheviks incl. Stalin himself. Stalin has not let Uyghurs and Qazaqs of the Eastern Türkestan to join the SU (and they WANTED to!), lost a possibility of a puffer state between Russia and China, and also uranium on those territories. But he violently annexed Western Ukraine, Western Belarus, Baltic States and one part of Roumania, where nobody wanted to live in the SU, and where the violent struggle against Russian occupiers last untill mid50´s. And people in those parts of the SU were the vanguard of anti-Soviet and separatist movements in the end of 80´s, actually destroying the Soviet Union. But Stalin was still in delusion of Russia as “European country” with the obligatory, but stupid expansion to the West.
This essay was partly correct, but also somewhat misconceived. China is a long term geopolitical competitor and threat to the West. It is huge in population and strong racially, and, having jettisoned Maoist economics, will only grow stronger economically and militarily (whatever its short term post-Covid hiccups, and despite the extensive capital misallocations which its still-overly centrally-directed economy routinely produces). It is not an immediate threat, however, nor should we view it as such. The only thing that matters for Occidentalists is halting Third World immigration imperialism, and rebuilding white racial pride and consciousness. Migrational imperialism combined with the white genocide/Diversity agenda are obviously the main threats. We cannot wholly ignore the outside world, but we should remain as studiedly indifferent to it as circumstances permit, focusing our efforts on halting immigration everywhere, and working towards the North American Ethnostate on this side of the Atlantic, and European indigenous uprisings and ethnonational decolonization, on the other side.
Agree, only one focus. Geopolitics are fun but we’re don’t even have a seat at the tible. Whites already are no longer a majority in any major city of the US which are disproportionately important in culture & politics. The elite are multi-ethnic and all institutions discriminate heavily against Whites. Wort of all, according to my calculations, in only one more generation, only 30% of births in USA will be White. The US is larping as a the West.
I think the writer is from Eastern Europe and unless you see it on the streets, in the corporations, government agencies, it’s hard to internalize this.
A recent comment of mine on another post is relevant here, too (at least in terms of expressing my fundamental thoughts on these matters):
In the Revilo Oliver book America’s Decline, reviewed here a few weeks ago, Oliver at one point seems to imply that the racial weakness of whites is psychologically related to our historically demonstrated collective superior imaginative capacity (one does not have to be an expert in Oriental languages to know that most of the world’s greatest literature was written by Europeans; various multilingual Asian, not to mention white, scholars have admitted as much). In brief, whites more than other races let our imaginations get the better of us. We seem to be especially prone to (really) believing in utopian possibilities (Jews of course have been extremely prominent in radical movements, but it’s difficult to discern how much of their activism was based on sincere utopian commitment vs the use of utopian rhetoric to weaken the cohesion and strengths of European societies and thereby concomitantly enhance Jewish ethnic power).
Our heightened racial imagination is thus a double-edged sword, enabling us to produce the greatest geniuses while rendering (too) many of us suckers for disregarding hard wisdom about the imperfectability of man and society, thereby periodically launching white nations on projects to “build a better world” which only end up strengthening our less imaginative but more realistic racial competitors at the expense of ourselves and our descendants. We in the West are clearly in one of these eras of utopian ambition right now. By denying that the imperfectability of man (obviously) extends to race relations and the possibility of building successful multiracial societies, we are on yet another of our race’s periodic fool’s errands. But this time, given our racial genetic recessiveness combined with the paucity of our racial numbers relative to other races, our vulnerability to utopian folly may lead us to a point of no return. We would hardly be the Earth’s first sub-species (race) or species whose maladaptedness to an altered set of conditions led to its extinction.
I continue to believe that our only hope remains white nationalist territorial ingathering into various sovereign or semi-sovereign jurisdictions where we can eventually form electoral as well as racial majorities. With such majorities we can push for secession and full sovereignty, after which we can commence the steadily intensifying “slow cleanse” theorized by Dr. Johnson. But without our own sovereign, defensible territories run by white preservationists in ways intended to ensure white preservation, we are, in the simple nature of existing trends, doomed – and this in the foreseeable if not exactly near future.
The best way to achieve ingathering would be a collapse of the American empire leading to fragmentation into multiple states. WNs could maybe dominate one of them. Meanwhile, free from overweening American cultural influence, Europe might wake up from their post WW2 hypnosis and create a Yockeyian pro-European union.
The idea of current America neutering China, as it did to Japan, on behalf of White civ seems quite out of touch. By the way, as dysfunctional as Japan is, they’re still healthier than America.
As a long time reader, comment poster, fan, supporter, donor, and occasional essay contributor of this great site, I’ve also confidently considered myself a keen China observer and analyst. Due to my recnet busy work schedule and some personal and family hassles, I haven’t got a chance to read updates on this site for a while. And when I finally squeezed out some time to do my favorite thing i.e relishing marvelous articles of our talented and thoughtful writers, this article jumped into my eyes first and foremost. It really delivered and did not disappoint by packing a powerful punch that is substantive, illuminating and thought-provoking.
This essay is so brilliantly written. It is one of the best and most sober-minded and sobering ones about China from the White Nationalist standpoint, and actually from stances of all political and ideological streaks. It is comprehensive, deep-going, profoundly insightful, and exceedingly accurate and gimlet-eyed in this observation and analysis of the “China Question”. A timely and priceless gem indeed, because the question entailed is really of great significance, of existential significance indeed, to the cause of White people and its future survival and revival, no hyperbole intended. I would rate this very article “top of the month” at this site without the slightest hesitation. Kudos to you, Mr. Jeelvy, and thank you very much for penning it.
From my decades of experience as a China and East Asian watcher and with my humble faculty of being a fluent Chinese and Japanese speaker, I agree with the main ideas in this article 100 percent. Mr. Jeelvy was so precise, poignant, trenchant, astute, and perspicacious in his take on China, its history, present, and collective national mentality centered on “spite”, “rancor”, and “vindication”, and characterized by the phrase “velvet paws hide sharp claws” (this one being perhaps less true today, as China has already started baring its teeth and claws in an increasingly and uncontrollably minatory, menacing, and swashbuckling fashion). This article is definitely a must read for all White nationalists, especially those in the “Sinophilic” circles of Andrew Anglin and would serve as a potent dose to expel the mystical fog of the morbid and deleterious China worship in some of our folks.
As Mr. Jeelvy has so clearly, loudly, and unmistakably pointed out, China in years to come would have no qualms conquering, subjugating, dispossessing, enslaving, and even exterminating the entire Whites on earth if it can. I have little to add to this consummate article, except to stress and further elucidate one point vis-a-vis those who falsely claim that China is historically not “expansionist” in nature and did not fight many wars of conquest over other smaller nations. Just take a quick look at the map of China. Historically, only the Central, Central-North, Central-East, Central-South and South parts of its huge current territory were Han Chinese, the Far-North (Manchurian), North (Mongolian), North-West (Uyghur), West (Tibetan), South-West (multiple smaller ethnic minorities) were all historically and traditionally not Han Chinese, which collectively occupies over half of today’s China’s geographic expanse. Han Chinese in the long history have conquered these lands that did not belong to them in the first place either through brute force of genocidal massacres or other means such as arranged imperial marriages, bribes and incremental encroachments backed by massive Han colonization, or the reverse-assimilation aka. sinnicization of conquering peoples by the conquered Han. The facts that about 92% of today’s China’s total population is Han Chinese who rules over a vast land of which only about 45% was historically its original homeland speak volume of Han Chinese’s expansionist nature and insatiable appetite for land and resource grabs.
This article is on par with, if not more in-depth and persuasive than, the previously posted articles of another great source on China Question on this site i.e., the ones written by “F. C. Comtaose” on this site. Readers who are interested in the China Question are strongly recommended to search for his articles on this site to read and I am sure they will find them also quite valuable, informative and enlightening.
As Mr. Jeelvy has shrewdly observed, White nations should unite to contain and tackle China for securing and safeguarding the existential right of the White race. Formerly antagonistic and alien, but long subdued, reconciled or tamed nations such as the Japanese, Korean, Taiwanese etc. should be fully leveraged and enlisted in this comprehensive struggle of political, geopolitical, economic, financial, technological, cultural, and racial dimensions. Among them Japan stands out as a distinct one, heads and shoulders above the rest e.g. Koreans and Taiwanese, despite Japan’s current listlessness, dormancy and political and economic malaise. I said this not because of the alleged “Honorary Aryan” status bestowed on Japan by Uncle Adolf for its allied relationship with the Third Reich during the WWII, but because the Japanese sub-race’s uniqueness in many national traits which make it racially, culturally, and psychologically closer to the Western Whites than other non-Whites on earth.
Besides being a high-trust society, largely honest, honorable, and clean, the Japanese has something deeper and more fundamental to distinguish itself from the rest of Asians. It has been proved through modern genetic studies that the in terms of racial composition, the Japanese, despite superficial resemblance to Chinese and Koreans, are hugely different than other East Asians and closer to Whites. Here’s an interesting and revealing anecdote: The indigenous people of Japan, who had historically mainly inhabited Northern Japan, the Ainu people are close to Caucasians in physical features. Besides, the main part of the Japanese people today are also significantly different than Koreans and Chinese in the sense that the male Japanese population of today has a distinctive collective gene unit that is utterly none-existent in Koreans and Chinese, and is only shared by Tibetans and residents of India’s Andaman Islands throughout the entire Asia.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment