The Jew ThingNicholas R. Jeelvy
I gathered from the conversation that the owner of the name had once been a regular contributor to much more widely read conservative publications, the kind that have salaried congressional correspondents and full-service LexisNexis accounts, but that he was welcome at those august portals no longer. In all innocence, I asked why this was so. “Oh,” explained one of my companions, “he got the Jew thing.”
— John Derbyshire
Take a look around you. Do you see degeneracy? Do you see white dispossession? Do you see decline in institutions and trust in them? Do you see endless wars in the Middle East? Chances are, it’s the Jews. The early lifers have their fingers in a lot of shit pies — probably all of them. Jewish subversion of white societies is probably not news for you if you are a Counter-Currents regular. But if you’re a newcomer, I warmly invite you to peruse the wealth of literature on the subject on this very site, as well as similar material published by other, allied publications. And you should, of course, read Kevin MacDonald’s Culture of Critique.
“Okay,” you say to me, “I get it. It’s the Jews. But do we have to say it? Can’t we merely rail against cultural Marxists, against liberals, against progressives? Why can’t we oppose white dispossession, degeneracy, and the decline of institutions on less unsavory grounds? Have you seen the kind of people who name the Jew? Do I really have to shave my head and start smoking meth? I think I’ll be far more comfortable pretending like the issue doesn’t exist. Yes, I know it’s true, but we’ll invite so much opprobrium, so much censorship. Why do we have to name the Jew?”
That’s a very good question. Certainly, there are benefits to not naming the Jew. Our long-nosed friends’ control of the commanding heights of society means that everyone who names the Jew gets cast into the outer darkness, with the weird people who shave their heads and smoke meth. From a tactical point of view, it seems obvious that even though it is true, we should refrain from naming the Jew, at least in public. Oh, sure, we can be secretly based and redpilled on the JQ, but not in public — never in public. It would invite no end of enmity and trouble.
Look at what the alt-lite offers: a tepid defense of white civilization without naming its principal enemy — or indeed, even whites themselves. You can tell they’re doing quite well. Not in the sense that they’ve accomplished anything. But these people blow through Counter-Currents’ annual budget in a week, mostly spending it on champagne, limousines, hookers, and blow.
Now, personally, I realize that it’s naught but vanity and no reward at all, but only for about five minutes before I have a reality check and realize I’m kidding myself. No, quite to the contrary. I’d love to be smothered in hookers, champagne, and blow while riding in an expensive limousine. It’s a little late for me now, but there was a time when I was invited to become a part of several grift machines which would have allowed me such a lifestyle. I did not take those offers and caught Mr. Derbyshire’s Jew thing instead. What could possibly possess an otherwise rational, clever young man to do so?
Let’s leave that aside for a second, and look at some hidden benefits of naming the Jew.
For starters, we’re not the first nationalist, populist or national-populist movement in the world. There have been others before us, others that have obviously failed because we see almost no governments in the West that are nationalist, populist, or both.
There are many reasons such movements fail. One of the most common causes is an unclear friend-enemy distinction. Failed movements surrender the art of defining themselves and the enemy to outsiders because they surrender culture and morality to people who may intend to subvert the movement and its ends and goals. People with long noses and small hats. I invite you to read this lengthy expose on the history of American populism and its subversion, mostly by early lifers. The archetypal example would be the John Birch Society, which was misled, manipulated, and subverted through poisonous alliances with Red Sea pedestrians pretending to be its friends. From within my lifetime, I can remember the rise of the Tea Party as an implicitly white reaction to Barack Obama’s election and then its decline into increasingly cringeworthy GDP- and Israel-worshipping conservatism. We saw the cooption of the MAGA movement from 2016, its transformation from a national populist uprising against the uniparty establishment to its integration into the GOP and transformation into increasingly cringeworthy GDP- and Israel-worshipping conservatism.
I am beginning to notice a pattern here.
While I can’t speak about the John Birch Society, I note that both the Tea Party and MAGA focused on rallies as a primary means of organizing and acting. Now, I’ve been to a few rallies in my time. The sensation is intoxicating. To see yourself as part of an enormous crowd is a sensation of pure power. One feels unstoppable. It speaks to the ancient part of the brain, especially the Right-wing, soldier-like brain. We, our side, our lads are many. They, the other side, the bad guys, they are few. That can only be understood as “we are strong and they are weak,” even though (and especially if) you understand at some other level that quite the opposite is true. Rally-going is a wholesome, family-friendly drug for conservatives who want to convince themselves that enormity of number and unity of purpose is power. But what use is power if you, to paraphrase Sun Tzu, know neither your enemy nor yourself?
In this sense, overt anti-Semitism (or at least counter-Semitism) is a vaccine. It is a sort of shibboleth, if you’d pardon my Hebrew. To weed out Judaic and philo-Semitic entryists — people historically proven to derail nationalist and populist movements through infiltration, manipulation, and subversion — all incoming members are required to name the Jew, to prove their commitment to their people and the cause through this act of radical, almost self-destructive honesty.
And if someone refuses to name the Jew, refuses to raise doubts about Jewish involvement in degeneracy and white dispossession, refuses to identify the culprits in the decline of the West? Well, that person is himself suspect. What is your motivation here, bub? What’s your game? Can we get a nose check in chat? Even people who may have had something interesting to say will be forced on the back foot and eventually become one-dimensional caricatures. Much like Seamus the Sheep Shagger of lore, who fathered seven sons, built seventy homes, and traveled the breadth and length of Ireland, but fucked just one sheep, someone who refuses to name the Jew will be consumed by an identity that will devour anything else they may have stood for: the identity of a JQ-denier. This is tragic, but certainly better than allowing a Jew or philo-Semite to infiltrate and subvert the movement. Note that it’s only necessary to deter entryists. Jews and philo-Semites who’ve proven themselves to be on our side get grandfathered in, even though we don’t quite give them the reins of power.
Did I say “self-destructive”? It certainly is. Remember the champagne, limousines, hookers, and blow? That door is permanently closed for me. Neither globohomo nor their tame and gelded conservative accomplices like people who walk away, and they’re certainly not going to let a known racist, fascist, sexist, and anti-Semite with 73 articles on counter-currents.com into the garden of earthly delights. All my friends who were warning me that “you’ll ruin your life” would seem to have been right.
Well, that’s one way of looking at it.
Another is that I won’t cut and run when the going gets tough. Hernan Cortes put his ships to the torch when he landed in Mexico and not a single one of his men deserted. A movement culture that demands its members publicly name the Jew has a means of enforcing skin in the game and preventing defections. It reinforces the idea of no way out but through.
As a final note, publicly naming the Jew breaks that most powerful of Jewish methods of subversion: crypsis, the notorious “fellow white” play. As a certain philologist with an interest in film and public communication is reputed to have said: “The Jew is immunized against all dangers. One may call him a scoundrel, a parasite, a swindler, a profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: ‘I’ve been found out!’”
We’ve seen from our own practice that using terms like Communists, cultural Marxists, globalists, progressives, or liberals opens us to infiltration and subversion by bad faith actors with long noses and small hats. Due to the Jew’s use of crypsis, any form of nationalism, identitarianism, or populism can be taken and instrumentalized towards the subversion of its original aims if
- it does not have an adequate definition of “friend,” us;
- it does not have an adequate definition of “enemy,” them;
- and it does not adequately distinguish between these two groups.
We can smoke them out with the strategic placement of a few Jew jokes and Phil Eiger Newman cartoons. By their oy veys shall you know them.
The old alt-right had a lot of problems, but its anti-Semitism kept it safe from Jewish entryism and this is what made it dangerous to the establishment. Unfortunately, it had no barriers against retard and psychopath entryism. What’s left of it can be reformed into a movement that can be safely safeguarded against all three, but whatever successful form a future movement will take, it will be at the very least aware of the JQ and willing to publicly discuss it.
JQ denialism, on the other hand, is essentially a red carpet rolled out for our long-nosed friends. It informs them that this club has no safeguards against infiltration and welcomes subversion.
If you want to support Counter-Currents, please send us a donation by going to our Entropy page and selecting “send paid chat.” Entropy allows you to donate any amount from $3 and up. All comments will be read and discussed in the next episode of Counter-Currents Radio, which airs every weekend on DLive.
Don’t forget to sign up for the twice-monthly email Counter-Currents Newsletter for exclusive content, offers, and news.
David Duke Reverses Opinion on Jews after Mel Brooks Binge
The Worst Week Yet: March 19-25, 2023
Žluté vesty zviditelnily tu nejfrancouzštější část Francie
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 527 Machiavellianism & More
Buddha a Führer: Mladý Emil Cioran o Německu
Enoch Powell, poslední tory
The Estonian Election & Nationalist Strategy
Counter-Currents Radio Podcast No. 526 Cyan Quinn Reports from CPAC & More
The fundamental problem is not jews or muslims or now its chinese then whatever next….its that most organisations like “alt-right” are very lite on the fact its a white european society most members join for, and there is no white european society unless its majority white european.
The fact our enemies (who have a much more developed doctrine than us) absolutely fly into a deranged hate at any explicitly pro-white actions shows that is what they fear.
So take away Jews and the organic, cyclic laws of civilization and decay, to paraphrase Brooks Adams, become inoperative? WRONG – dah.
Of course these laws remain relevant with or without jews. I don’t think Mr Jeelvy is even saying point oit jews to the exclusion of everything else. But if we are not allowed to point out jewish behavior as we are the behavior of such groups as blacks or mestizos, then maybe the JQ has more salience than the questions of other groups. Why is this controversial?
The Jew (and the whole spiritual formation to which he as the ideal type belongs, by no means exclusively) is the natural agent of the last cycle, and the embodiment of all of its distinct qualities – lack of form above all. He is the dominant force in this age, as much as the solar race – ascetic, individuated, form-creating – is a latent force in it. It is essentially the same question. Of course, we live in a world suffering from mass collective dementia, so it is difficult to draw the line where one thing begins and the other ends. What can be said of the sad moral state of the British society for instance? But it takes special will to ignorance to deny that it is rather evident who pulls the strings, and who dances to the tune.
A cycle requires that the material basis of the cycle remain intact. The primary material basis of a cycle for any human population is the genetics of that population.
Without the White genocide project, you can have cycles. The Italians go up, the Italians go down, and at another time the Italians can go up again, because they are still Italians, with the genes, the temperament, and the talents of Italians. And the same for the Germans, the Russians, and so on.
With the White genocide project, which Jews are promoting, the cycles are at an end. When Whites are crushed by anti-White psychological warfare, mass non-White immigration, and forced assimilation or suppressed fertility, there is no cycle, there is death.
Imagining that we can still have cycles without protecting White genetics from the Jewish-promoted White genocide project is like imagining that a cart wheel can continue to turn after the wood it is composed of has been burned and the ashes scattered.
You have made this point in other comments and, if you have not already done so, I would appreciate it if you could expound on your thoughts a little and turn this into an essay. I, for one, would find it useful to get a good overview, not only of the rise of capitalism, but theories on cyclical nature of culture; any books you reference of course would be an added bonus.
Only if you want to of course. Anything you write however would not only be excellent educational material but provide a good basis for further discussion.
Wishing you a Merry Christmas in the South Seas.
The Jews are always cockroaches tap dancing on the ruined buildings of the late, great civilization. Funny how it just works out that way.
That derb quote is fascinating to me, as I see it is to others. Does anyone know whom he was talking about, or could at least supply an educated conjecture? Was the individual one of these people the Jews are after, or was it merely some person who criticized Israel or opposed their latest war? There is also some politician they are after, cf. the imagine dragons song America. Who might that be? It’s a minor theme in the music of the ainur, but seems to be there.
I’m not sure, but if I had to guess, it would be Joe Sobran. Second guess would be Sam Francis, but again, only speculating.
Refusing to name the Jew while being otherwise red-pilled will not keep you from being cancelled. Derbyshire used to write for National Review, now he is an outcast. Molyneux only occasionally hinted at it, and he was cancelled. Black Pigeon Speaks has never mentioned Israel or Jews and, well, you get the idea. If we’re going to be pariahs for speaking 75% of the truth, we might as well speak 100% of the truth.
On a personal note, I’ve been surprised by how many normies are willing to talk about Jewish power and Zionism.
That’s what I thought too. But it seems something deeper than just saying the wrong thing on race or Israel doesn’t it? No one would call those the “Jew thing,” although I don’t know. I don’t know what it’s like behind the doors of punditry. It’s really other sources of control, the editors, their henchmen who regulate those obvious issues.
I think it is Joe Sobran. I attended the 2004 Amren conference and Joe gave a talk in which part of it was highly critical of Jews. I have read all of Sam Francis’s articles in “Chronicles Magazine” for many years and I don’t remember him ever criticizing Jews.
He makes “the Jew thing” sound like a horrible disease when in fact it the antidote.
Well written, much appreciated.
I have personally started to name the Jew, and it works. It is remarkable how many people recognize the JQ. They may see it in a different context, but they see it. Older people remember, always, from their life the action of the Jew. Younger are informed, they follow alt-lite and social media has the name, they know the name.
I say, let’s, indeed, name The Jew. It is the beginning of the light, the end of the endless tunnel of darkness.
I have got reaction, positive, understanding reaction, from sources that I would never have believed to know the name. But they do.
And, of course, let’s not forget, all the lackeys, all the whores, of our society, the so called “leaders”, oh, THEY know it, they know it better than anybody. So, what the heck, everybody knows it, so naming is just one thing amongst the others.
I work around high normie types. They have a willful blindness to these issues. Occasionally after it has been discussed at one of these sites, I’ll ask one whether he thinks Epstein killed himself, was spirited away or what. These are people who know the intimate details of and are indignant about Biden’s lap top, trumps latest statements, etc etc. when Epstein is mentioned, they look at me like I just said something in Turkish and then respond that they honestly don’t know anything about it and would not want to make an uninformed statement lol! It’s a protective ignorance. Whether it’s a calculated deception or a psychological blind spot, I don’t know.
I stumbled into a normie conversation the other day with a group that was hammering “that POS Zuckerberg” and saying the gov’t needed to do something. I was shocked…some common ground. I threw in my 2 cents, but was met with concerned looks. I realized they were actually mad that Facebook wasn’t censoring enough, and wanted the State to compel them to censor more. “You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater,” one remarked. That’s the go-to normie line for dystopian levels of censorship these days. Keep in mind, FB recently taxonimized hate speech on its platform, making “hate” directed at gays, Jews, etc. a top priority, while designating anti-white comments “low-sensitivity” and not subject to deletion. I thought about mentioning this, but it would have been music to their ears–and yet, still not good enough.
It’s much more than some kind of “calculated deception”, it is fear.
Like a cruel and vindictive slave master, the Jew is feared. Consciously or not, most people intuitively recognize their unmentionable power, the power the Jew posseses to greatly harm if not destroy the lives of those who dare speak against him.
It’s not fear, precisely, at least not a physical fear. They show no fear in the face of truly dangerous things like black crime or Muslim terrorism, and many seem to exploit and enjoy it too much. It’s more a social fear of saying or thinking something non normative, or of getting yelled at.
“It’s more a social fear of saying or thinking something non normative, or of getting yelled at.”
It’s the fear of losing your job, any chance of getting another job, being defamed in the media and then defamed on the Internet, forever – possibly the defamation forming the major part of your Wikipedia page.
Most people can handle “getting yelled at” or some social embarrassment. Few people can withstand the rest.
Thank you for writing this.
Name them and Shame them – Constantly !
Great, timely article. Thank you.
“Yeah, but do I have to get tatted up, shave my head, and smoke meth in order to name the Jew?”
LOL x 100. C’mon Jeelvy, we’re in very good company: The Christus, Martin Luther, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Seneca, Wagner, George Washington, Winston Churchill, Mark Twain, Ulysses S Grant, George Bernard Shaw, H.L. Mencken, Henry Ford, Truman Capote, Voltaire, H.G. Wells, Charles Lindbergh, Henry Ford.
Yes, everybody must utter the holy trinity of antisemitism:
1) Judaism is an Economic and Political Conspiracy to take over the World.
2) There were no gas chambahz nor soap nor yooman skin lampshades.
3) Israel is a raycis apartheid colonialist state,
I’m Jewish and find this article without fault
In reality, if it appears to Them that they are being exposed in general consensus, they will pull the plug on the national, and perhaps world, economy. They are dug in like a tick, in that regard.
In theory, one might wonder as to what Hitler and his circle might have done differently to dig that tick out of their society. To me, this seems to be an intellectual exercise that N.A. New Right wants to think through, and of course extend to all Third Worlders in our midst.
I am not saying I have a clear idea of this myself, but there may come a day when the naming and shaming step may have to be skipped over and some amount of force be applied.
Power, and the lack thereof, then remains the issue. Can this ever actually be gained by changing minds first?
Could the Harry Potter series have been secretly based?? The taboo of naming “he who must not be named” broken by the eponymous hero? Was the villain’s real name Voldemortenstein?
Thanks for your essay: it seems to have been written for newbies like me. I’ve only been studying White nationalism for a year now, having been a libertarian (anarcho-capitalist) for most of my post-university life. Believe it or not, what red-pilled me was the infamous Gillette commercial “The best a man can be”. So I can give an exact date to my change: January 13, 2019. it’s assault on masculinity shocked me and insulted me: ‘I’m not like that’, I remember saying. Unfortunately, libertarianism didn’t have an answer to the reasons for these attacks (other than: buy another brand or razor blade). This is how I started gravitating towards conservative sites which were critical of this –eventually buying Jared Taylor’s ‘White Identity’, and Greg Johnson’s ‘The White Nationalist Manifesto’. (Before that I did a DNA test to see for myself if I qualified 😊).
Coincidentally, right now I am in fact reading Kevin MacDonald’s ‘The Culture of Critique’, which you mentioned. I can only read it one bit at a time because it makes me so angry that I have to stop and take a deep breath.
After this long introduction, I go to my question: why do we need to use anti-Semitism as a gatekeeper to avoid infiltration from Jews? Why do we have to be anti-something, instead of pro-something?
Wouldn’t a blunt statement of our position as a pro White European ethnonationalist movement be enough?
I started out as a guy who really wanted to be just pro my people and not against anyone. But eventually, you’ll bump into other people who don’t like your people, to a degree that they want to enslave, disposes or exterminate them. You have to become anti-those people, especially if their favored method is infiltration, manipulation and subversion. It’s the only way to protect your movement from attempts to infiltrate it.
That’s something that has come home to me in recent years: those nice, articulate, liberal voices pontificating on the MSM can seem so well-meaning and sincere. But virtually all of them would be content to see me arrested and imprisoned for holding the views I do.
They really are my enemies and need to be treated as such.
Hi Nemesis, it made me very happy to read your red pill moment, as I actually worked with the director of that commercial many years ago. She used to waltz into the studio in the tightest dress imaginable, she was attractive and used ALL her female sexuality to get herself where she wanted to go. All the way up the sycophantic greasy pole, to the giddy heights of advertising! Then years later directing these poisonous and reality inverting propaganda, virtue signalling ads. Why is this wrinkled husk so hateful? Especially as she’s an Australian (I recall) and made a fortune in my country, England! It is white men that she manipulated through pussy power, and decent white men and women who gave this ungrateful snake many, many opportunities. There are few people that honestly disgust me in such a deep and visceral way. Oh, for the times when we could cut a cancer like that out of our society swiftly and without remorse. Stay on your journey of truth seeking.
It is important to hate the sin and not the sinner. Even your hypocritical Jezebel is caught in a dense web of lies and following the script she has been learning from infancy. This is the horror and the genius of what has been wrought upon us.
Of course the most important lie, the keystone of the whole facade, is the one which is most aggressively defended. The inner peace and sense of resolve which descended upon me when I understood this was revelation. Our problem now is that we are rapidly losing our right to free speech as evidenced by Marcus Rose’s call in The Spectator for introduction of European-style laws in Australia.
I crossed this Rubicon ten years ago and never looked back. It’s the only way.
This is an very important and complex subject.
Without desiring to get into a big argument here, I will state that “calling out” Jews will have no credibility unless and until the Right ALSO formulates a just, defensible, and implementable proposal for the future disposition of Jewish populations, both within Western nations and globally.
Folks, this is all about the elephant in the room. You all know which one. The German solution, 1933-1945. It didn’t work the first time, and there won’t be a second time. Forget about it.
The objective is: “Permanently eliminating Jewish socio-economic influence in the lives of future Westerners”. How? Put on your thinking-caps and come up with a way to do this without resorting to the German solution.
Remember, the Jew is just the doughy little man behind the curtain. A parasite vis-a-vis the High Cultures of history. Always has been. All his power comes from his host populations. Cut off his supply, and he will – he MUST – go away, just like the flea must jump off the dead dog and find the next dog. WE must learn how to cut off his supply. Or enable him to live without parasitism. I think many Jews understand this.
Yes, likely as long as Jews exist anywhere, there will be the potential for some Culture to become the “next dog”, but with Israel now available to accommodate them… Remember, the original German plan was to banish them to Madagascar. The war forced another approach.
Respectfully disagree. The Jews are the Jews problem. That’s it. Whites must pursue their interests with only a tactical regard for the effect on other races. While White rule is, in general, the best rule, not all races will see things that way and Jews most of all will not.
Before speaking of the ‘German solution’ in ominous tones, perhaps educate yourself as to the actual policies of the Reich with regard to Jewish power and Jewish presence in the dominions of the Reich. In the end, international Jewry — including the Comintern — created and exacerbated the situation of the Jews in Germany.
I see no reason to reject the ‘German solution’. The Jews were removed from power and influence over non-Jewish Germans. Had it not been for the Jewish Communists and international Jewry and their terrorism, the out-migration of the Jews would have taken place in an orderly and humane fashion.
The German solution — out-migration — is the correct solution.
If someone tells you that the Germans and the Reich would not have been satisfied with the expulsion of the Jews, they’re lying.
I misinterpreted you. I think you were just too subtle in implying our remedy and I thought you were proposing no remedy at all. My apologies.
They have a homeland with guaranteed right of return. They simply need to be shown the door.
Never heard “early-lifer” before. What’s that even mean?
I do like Jeelvy’s articles – very much – but some of his referents are difficult to know what they are – like ‘early lifer’ – can’t find the meme on Google. I think there should be some footnotes – so we who are -not yet! – ALL part of the cognoscenti will be able to internalise (and use ourselves) what he so eloquently talks about. (also the “certain philologist” -not sure who he is – and I’d like to know)
I do like his shift in tone from the highbrow to the profane in his articles – it’s very effective.
Thanks Nicholas. Please do reply – I DO want to know these things.
The philologist was Dr Joseph Goebbels, who was not overly enamoured of the special people!
It refers to the “early life” section of Wikipedia profiles of these people. You will invariably see “so and so grew up in a Jewish household” and naturally suffered untold antisemitic attacks before rising above and becoming wildly successful. (The last bit is my addition, but it comes up a lot)
This is hilarious. Thank you for explaining.
Twitter slang. New way of calling someone’s ethnic loyalties into doubt by dropping a screen-shot of the early life section on their wikipedia page.
It is a way you can you can use to check up on a suspect person – check out the “early life” section in wiki or whatever. If it mentions parents JewishNess or going to a yeshiva school etc, you have yourself a Jew. Other source is Jew or No (run by Jews) who check out famous people they desperately want to brag are Jewish. Knowing this heritage can make you consider what interest might animate their opinion/argument.
Great article, as is everything this author does.
I’ll be looking forward to the follow-up about preventing retard/psychopath entryism
What about Jew Monocausalism or Jew Overfixation or Jew Reductionism or Jew Maximalism? I have noticed these can have a corrupting effect on some people’s intelligence and oversight as well. Some get a sort of JQ denialism panic if you profess a more nuanced view on the issue than they have and demand the most fanatic commitment. But the JQ can certainly be recognized and the same time be very differently weighted. The majority of “communists, cultural Marxists, globalists, progressives, or liberals” isn’t Jewish, and it is ridiculous and just wrong to assume they are all being pulled by kosher strings only. That would make Jews really all-powerful, god-like creatures. Occidental Observer recently had a hard time to find a significant number of Jews being involved in the “Great Reset”, which is really the most threatening globalist endgame. Klaus Schwab being a member of the tribe is merely an unlikely speculation. There is so much, much more going on than Jews working on decline and that should not be denied either.
ultimately you have to come up your paradigm and when you publish it people will enter support or refute it. Many gentile whites do consider Jews a formidable adversary. Calling them “god-like” is just childish nonsense.
I think there is some analogy to parasites and other pathological biological matter in nature which make other organisms act in bizarre ways so as to spread the parasite or virus or whatever. And that is real Jewish political power. Jews have created a framework of impetus through public rewards, punishments, pressure and propaganda that steer others into promoting their goals. Perhaps it’s not that Jews need to be all powerful, but just powerful enough to tip politics into a certain direction that suits them and keep it there mostly.
But yes it’s also true there are whites who have destructive political ideas which they think are the pinnacle of morality, yet as I said in another post here if you take Jews out the equation I would suggest that a lot of anti-white sentiments will markedly decrease or vanish altogether.
If we zoom out and consider different ethnic groups as entire organisms, it’s clear that the Jewish organism is inflicting a lot of damage and chaos on whites partly by legitimizing any destructive tendencies in the white organism. The white organism barely seems aware of what is happening to it. We notice, because as White nationalists we are the antibodies for this organism.
Common problem of fixating yourself upon the enemy. Always remember who you are and that anti-semitism doesn’t define you, it’s your love for your own kin. Anti-semistism is just a tactical consequence of of our present political condition and natural choice when our spirital values meet the jewish ones (which jews themselves admit, even if indirectly). Same goes for anti-islamism, anti-immigration and other political stances.
Those who hate jews more than they love their own inevitably fall into hate-spirall and adopt jewish characteristics like hysteria, vengefulness, incessant kvetching and paranoia. Never let your enemy live rent-free in your head.
Fair comment. Nevertheless the demoralisation of Western manhood is so intimately bound up with liberalism and it’s initially stealthy but now relentless demonisation of us that I feel we really have little choice but to discredit its authors and quickly.
We don’t need to hate anyone -as they can’t help themselves, whether due to heredity or upbringing – but we need to get the message out before the First Amendment is overridden by hate speech laws. It would be best if we could present the story of the ruin of the West in such a way as to give the Jews an honourable exit, as much for propaganda purposes for our own people as to convince the occupiers. At a conscious level, after all, this has been a project of a super-elite, who are the ultimate enemy.
Of course the difficulty is that you can only hope to reach a cognitively free segment of the populace and in so doing you may just be marking them out for eradication by the Cheka. The opponent is not bound by a sense of honour but possesses a relentless will to power and currently wields the bulk of the power of the state and of the popular mind.
its not it’s
“What about Jew Monocausalism ”
It’s the truth.
Thank you for your totally good-faith question.
I agree. A very wise friend of mine and veteran British nationalist going way back to the early 1970s made a similar point: one consequence of the taboo on saying that the Jews are a distinct ethno-religious group, whose mentality, interests &c. are very different from ours, but who (unfortunately for us) have wealth and influence in our societies out of all proportion to their numbers, is a reactive tendency amongst WNs to a crude reductionism, by which every malign tendency in white societies is explained away by the supposed all pervasive evil influence of the (((usual suspects))).
The proximate roots of liberalism, to-day perhaps the greatest threat to the existence of our people and a future for white children, are in the Anglo-Scottish Enlightenment, an entirely indigenous phenomenon, while its more distant origins are probably genetically determined. The low level of ethno-centrism amongst whites in general and Anglo-Saxons in particular is only readily explicable by a genetic predisposition to hyperindividualism that explains why liberalism has become the official ideology of our own elites.
While Jews no doubt played a much more important role in the spread of leftist ideologies, a realistic view of history shows us that for many generations, such ideas appealed to large sections of the white working class who had never encountered a Jew in their lives.
That appeal is no doubt explicable in part by the often disdainful and exploitative attitude of the indigenous rich towards the poor, but, uncomfortably though it is to acknowledge this fact, was often matched (especially in Europe) by a sullen, resentful class hatred amongst the poor, combined with a fatalistic hopelessness about improving their own situation in any other way than by redistributive hands outs from the state.
Mr Jeelvy will be more familiar than most with the kind of white gentile who fought enthusiastically for Communism in the former Yugoslavia between 1941 and 1945, of whom I also have some knowledge, admittedly largely derived from NDH supporters (Mr Jeelvy will know what I mean by that!) and other enemies of the Communist Party.
Communist Partisans of the Second World War and their counterparts who fought no less enthusiastically but unsuccessfully for Communism in Spain between 1936 and 1939 were not by and large corrupted by Jews but predisposed to such engagement by their own class resentment and perceived self-interest in the outcome of the class war. For them, class meant more than race, however strongly we might disagree with that view, considering it an example of false consciousness and thinking that such men as Queipo y Llano and Vjekoslav Ljuburic knew what to do with such people.
No doubt (((they))) have exploited such bad white traits as hyperindividualism and such poisonous societal phenomena as extreme class alienation, but (((they))) did not create these things, any more than the shlock merchant peddling tatty plastic raincoats in a downpour made the weather.
The only thing I’ve ever said about my anti-Semitism in public was not that I was anti-Zionist, which is a cop-out, or anti-Jew, which is a sentiment engineered to seem genocidal from the outset. It was that I am opposed to political Judaism. And it seemed to go over rather well. People seemed to understand what I meant by it and it felt like I wasn’t immediately calling for Holocaust part two: the Gassening. And more importantly, it reflected what I am actually opposed to. I am opposed to white dispossession, white guilt and the disintegration of white families and culture, and by stating I am opposed to political Judaism I declare that it is political Judaism which demonstrably proliferates all of these things that I oppose. Never oppose the Jews without alluding to their political power and cultural domination, to wrench from them their most prized possession: their eternal victimhood.
I’m a grassroots dissident-right operative. I am plugged into a number of conservative associations focusing on gun rights, immigration, and the like. I name the Jewish, but I do it very carefully. I don’t talk about da joos. I talk about George Sonos “and his group of likewise wealthy friends.” And I watch every conservative in the room nod his head in agreement. LOTS of “normie” grassroots conservative people have awoken to the JQ over recent years.
Tucker does a good job of this. He mentioned Soros funding these various leftist DA’s and said that anyone mentioning thus gets called a bigot. It would be more accurate to have said antisemite instead of bigot but subconsciously the viewers know what he really meant. Tucker’s dog whistling is getting pretty loud these days.
The American media is largely run by insecure Jews who are descended from socialist eastern European Jews. They migrated to the USA as the Nazis rose to power in Europe 90 years ago. They settled in New York City. Over several generations they began to dominate the mainstream media. They see another holocaust around every corner and relentlessly work to undermine conservative politicians in America. They are the source of the nation’s current severe problems.
A lot of the articles and comments here and at Unz Review are from people who’ve obviously not worked for and with Jews on Wall Street or otherwise in NYC as you seem to have. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the level of abstraction suggests they intellectually grasp the hatred Jews have for them, but they haven’t emotionally grasped this fact, leaving them without the instincts to understand that, for a betting man, every encounter with a Jew had better be considered an adversarial contest in which one wins and the other loses. The hate in their eyes generally belies the sham friendliness in that ear-to-ear grin. Schumer’s malevolent grin is representative.
They are paranoid, all right, and like Freud, they hear what you’re saying, but insanely believe they can read your mind and somehow know you hate and envy them as much as they hate and loathe you. Avoidance as much as possible is naturally the best way to deal with psychotic people.
As for the “normies” with the money to do something–presumably we’re talking about those in the wealthy suburbs of NYC–what are they supposed to do? Go around calling out the treachery, collusion, treason, and so on, of the Jews they work for and so throw away their children’s future? Forget them. You won’t find them in church on Sunday so much as tooling around town in their Porsche convertible wearing pastel socks and a dusty pink baseball cap on the way to the bagel shop–and don’t forget to get lox, cream cheese and the New York Times while you’re there, dear.
I’ve said it several times here, and I’ll say it again, though our Christian allies will undoubtedly shudder at the sentiment as they have before:
It’s pointless to be a White nationalist harping on the Jewish Question while worshiping a particular historical Jewish man as God.
Especially the Trads, they got the whole bloody family on their lips and on their altars 24/7 — Yeshua, Miriam, Yosef. Yikes!
If Whites can’t even have an indigenous spirituality of their own without relying on the Jews for that most fundamental of human expressions, there’s no hope.
How could the whole legacy of Christianity be extracted from Western Culture? Christianity is the ringworm of West – a malady the West was born with. Intertwined from the beginning.
It would take at least 10 consecutive generations to do it. An whole alternate belief system would have to be substituted. The State would become the new God, or some variant of that.
The West will need to be re-invented in order to survive. Expect a miracle…
No doubt, Europe united under Christendom had its benefits. I’m not saying that the “whole legacy of Christianity” needs to be extracted. All I’m saying is that, in my view, it’s the ultimate irony and contradiction for White Christians who are aware of the Jewish Question, and who denounce the Jews’ negative influence, to worship an actual historical flesh-and-blood Jew as God himself. I don’t know. Maybe I’m an oddball. Doesn’t anyone else see this as a problem, or is just me?
With all the Jews’ condemnation of the Egyptians, for instance, and their problematic intertwined histories and conflicts — imagine if the Jews worshiped Pharaoh Amenhotep III as God. It just seems to be a perverse thing for ANY people to do.
Jesus was explicitly anti-semitic. The problem is Christianity selects for soft headed and soft hearted people who will not make the tough decisions. Although Christian myself, I have come to the conclusion that voting for a Christian or someone who signals as such is foolish. Mainstream Christians have become in need of protectors almost as much as the Mennonites.
Christianity has its advantages and disadvantages. One advantage it has at the present time is that it is the religion of nearly all of our ancestors and, as a consequence, should be treated with respect due custom and tradition, even if one no longer honors the specifics of that tradition. Have some gratitude for what Christianity accomplished, even as you acknowledge its failings and failures.
Tell us more on how Jesus magically turned into a European.
I’m curious as to what you envision for an ‘indigenous spirituality’. I see neither a way back — the pagan ways are lost to us — or a way forward — anything new in this age of spiritual dissipation would seem doomed to falseness right from the start — so what is the answer?
Are the pagan ways lost to us? I see a lot of people of European descent rediscovering their pagan roots. In an age of pluralism, this may be one of the benefits for Whites.
Of course, the deeper question might indeed be: How do we balance indigenous European spiritual traditions with the factors of scientific and technological innovation which Western culture also gave rise to?
There need not be a conflict. To dismiss any spirituality as “false” is like trying to use scientific/mathematical principles to “disprove” an individual’s preference for the color blue.
I think the answer to your question ultimately lies in two branches of philosophy: epistemology and aesthetics. 1) Recognize the limits of what we can know rationally/scientifically, 2) Embrace the notion — which can serve as a solid foundation for European humanity — that beauty is truth, truth beauty. (Please read Keats’ poem, “Ode on a Grecian Urn.”)
” there may come a day when the naming and shaming step may have to be skipped over and some amount of force be applied.”
I must associate myself with this healthy sentiment. I reveled in that line seen in a just-published novel: “Kill ten and a hundred will leave. Kill a hundred and all will leave.”
And mischlings, too.
If, as this author seems to be saying, we should repudiate those whom we deem insufficiently antisemitic to be in our ‘movement’, is it not then hypocritical for us to chide the Blacks who ‘blame Whitey’ for all their ills?
1. Unlike the blacks, we don’t really believe the Jews are to blame for all our ills. For starters, we knew they were snakes when we let them in.
2. You might want to peruse my essays on Hegel from the Ghetto and When They Fight, They Fight with regard to black-white power relations. It’s not as clear as that.
3. Charges of hypocrisy won’t stick if we do not hold whites and blacks to the same moral standard (and we shouldn’t).
It depends on whether a given grievance is based in reality or not. Also, one difference between us and the blacks you speak of is that many white nationalists want to be separated from the Jews. There aren’t many U.S. blacks that wish to be separated from whites, I don’t think. But of course, I support the ones that do exist.
hypocrisy is a European moral construct that other races don’t care about. We need to forget about European ideals of fairness when dealing with other races. Other races do not care about ideals or fairness when interacting with us.
Amen and Amen to that. Was thinking of making a very similar comment.
In any argument, whenever I hear someone say, “Well, to be fair…” I know they are White. None of the other races are as foolish as we are, trapped in our own moralism.
I have been arguing that, the crux of jewish/white interaction is the religious/cultural/ETHICAL frame work of morality that favors the jews ..JEWS regard any and all goyim morality, LAWS, Ethics, as essentially trash…and the Talmud/Torah commands the jews to subvert them to profit and discard them, as the jewish paramount mission in life…these principles are taugh, ingrained, sealed, marked into the jewish conciousness since birth at home, schooling and their Yeshivas and reinforced 24/7 within their insular claustrophobic tribal societies in mind, spirit and even their corrosive genetical incestous relationships.
All this may be true of a majority of Jews but there are certainly notable exceptions who escape this complex, and there is a growing element of our own people who adopt a similar Jewish mindset and struggle at the margins to co-exist with the Jews and exploit the goyim. These are the ones who are then set up as betes noir by the clerisy, illustrating the essential evils of whiteness to the coloured folk and the self-critical white majority, while the distorters hide behind their privileged position in the prevailing ‘Holocaustian’ state ideology.
The solution will be to overthrow the state ideology so as to expose the otherwise indefensible and self-evident parasitism.
Exactly. It’s both pointless and a waste of time dealing with them.
If I may link this by Jonathan Bowden.
What is an “early lifer?”
The problem is any sort of criticism of Jewish social activism gets labeled as antisemitism. Ha’aretz, the leftist Israeli news paper has no problem talking about Sheldon Adelson funding settlements. But George Soros’ money? That’s a classic antisemitic trope.
While I think Jews play a great part in leftist subversion I think Jared Taylor is right in laying much of the blame on whites.
Can you build a WHITE nationalist Movement within a nonwhite majority country? Is the best hope a NON JEWISH nationalists multidiverse (racial) movement…whites are hurting but many blacks are hurting more (open borders). Mos definitely Any movement that is not openly naming the jew is suspect of collaboration with the enemy. NO jew will throwh his money, support for openly antijewish causes..would they???…JEWS had been subverting white western socities (empires) since the beginning of history (jewish revolutionary spirit) Phoenicians, Greeks (Macabeans), certainly Roman, Persians, and other European white christian nations Spain, Portugal, UK, France, Ottoman etc. Paradoxically jews can not exists or be inmensely wealthy without white western liberal democracies which they hate!!!. The best weapon against the JEWS is the LAWS they are mostly criminals even the Talmud commands them to break the white christian goyim laws…BUT the best weapon would be the day that WHITE BLACK NATIONALSITS understand the power of money$$$ in the form of financial power investing, buying, paying, subscribing, soliciting loans, building local power (voting), or choosing to withdraw it…as usual any MAGA movement will be malign, attack, sue, infiltrated, dislodge from without and within, the jews already killed two presidents that we know, and there other deeds that we dont know…the chances for a MAGA MOVEMENT are minimal but the journey will be worth it..Cortez had no more than 20men, Fidel Castro fewer than 15, Mahoma a handful, Mao and Ho Chi Ming were unknown little men in the early 1940s…great movements start small…the bigesst thing to fear by the jews are IDEAS…that build movements..
This piece really made my day. Great stuff. This problem needs solving and this is where it starts. Despite the Jews efforts the overton window is shifting, and not in their favor. Even just a few years ago this piece would have been unthinkable, yet everywhere I look I am delighted to see similar conversations taking place. Any organization if it is to succeed must successfully vet the Jew out of it. Not only this, they must be kept from any form of power anywhere. There is no place for them within our societies.
Finally a rational decision from Brussels. Anyone who treats animals in this way has no respect for people either. The same should happen with regard to circumcision. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9064255/Belgian-ban-Muslim-halal-Jewish-kosher-animal-slaughter-backed-EU-court.html
That was a very nice read.
That cartoons abit harsh :/
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Edit your comment