Counter-Currents
905 words
Barry Washington, Jr., a black man, accosted and later assaulted Ian Cranston and his girlfriend, who are white, on September 19 in Bend, Oregon. Ian Cranston shot him in self-defense. Because Washington’s assault on the girl was sexually motivated, the media spun it as “a black man shot for complimenting a white woman.” Deschutes County’s liberal District Attorney threw the book at Cranston, indicting him for second-degree murder. The case is still at trial, but the message has been sent: It’s illegal for white men to defend their women against sexual assaults if the perpetrator is black.
Barry Washington, Jr. was in all probability some form of lowlife. He posted images to Instagram with captions that read, “if your bf white you single to me. Fuck timmy gon do?” Well, as they say in the movies, Barry Washington, Jr. fucked around and found out. Turns out “timmy” was packing. Now he’s dead.
Normally, that would be the end of it: Another menace to society turned into worm food, and the good guys go back home and have a party. But we live in 2021, and sexually assaulting white women will soon become legal for blacks.
This is not to say that the laws on the books will change, but laws are only meaningful when they are enforced. If a man defending his girlfriend, wife, or any other woman from sexual assault by a feral black can be charged with and convicted of murder, then defending a woman from sexual assault is de facto illegal, which of course means that sexual assault is de facto legal when the perpetrator is black. And this latest case came hot on the heels of a jury in Minneapolis deciding that enforcing the law and restraining a negro criminal is also illegal – which means that all manner of crimes will soon be legal for blacks across the board.
However, the sexual character of the crime legalized after the fact in the Washington case raises the stakes for white people in America. While blacks running wild in ordinary crimes might be something that a suburbanite could live with — out of sight, out of mind — the legalization of black-on-white sexual assault means that nowhere is safe. As Sheriff Bart so eloquently put it, where da white women at?
The gradual process of black crime legalization in America has led some to point out that it places blacks in the social position usually held by aristocracy: their persons are inviolate and sacred and they are incapable of being charged with a crime and morally incapable of doing wrong. With the legalization of sexual assault, however, blacks will have attained rights not even historical aristocrats enjoyed — ahistorical claims of ius prima nocte in Europe notwithstanding.
And with the rise of a black aristocratic class, of course, we shall also observe a concordant fall of whites to a status lower than that of a European serf or a negro slave in the American South, where white women are mere booty for the taking – only for blacks, of course.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The Year America Died by clicking here.
We could see the warning signs in the Floyd/Chauvin case, but it’s now clearer than ever that in the new legal landscape, whites cannot follow the letter of the law without running afoul of the law, and this is because the spirit of the law has become so profoundly anti-white that being white and inviolate is now illegal. How dare Ian Cranston, that uppity “timmy,” shoot the gallant Barry Washington, Jr., who just paid that ungrateful white whore a compliment? What better compliment can a white woman receive than a blessed Negro’s sexual attentions? She should be on her knees begging for his anointment instead of rutting with her white man, producing yet more problematic white people.
Whenever I address these questions, I always advise people to respect the law. At this point, however, defending your womenfolk from blacks’ sexual predations is now essentially illegal in America. Incidentally, so is defending your property or your own person from their predations. And even if the police happen to respond, it’s now illegal for them use force to restrain them as well. So I’ll break my rule and say that even if it is de facto illegal for you to defend your womenfolk, you must do it.
Obviously, you should try not to live in a jurisdiction where this is a problem. You should avoid blacks like the plague they are, most especially if you have women in tow. But the answer to “Fuck timmy gon do?” should be “shoot you.” If white people are going to survive — if white men are to remain men — we defend our women from black predation, whatever the consequences. This is a red line that anti-whites and predatory blacks must not cross.
Ian Cranston is probably going to be convicted. He’ll most likely be sent to prison for a long time. Or maybe we’ll get lucky and dodge this bullet for now — until the next lecherous Negro accosts a white woman, underestimates “timmy,” and gets shot for his trouble. But we have to assume that, as in the Chauvin case, facts and the law will not matter: the judge and jury will convict him, either buckling under pressure from BLM and the progressive Left, or simply because they are themselves true believers. At that point, it’ll be officially illegal to be a white man in America — unless you’re a racial cuckold.
Prepare and act accordingly.
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate $120 or more per year.
- First, donor comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Second, donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Non-donors will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days.
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, sign up here:
25 comments
But I thought that accosting strange women in the street had been deemed the very quintessence of toxic masculine behaviour — tantamount to rape according to cutting edge feminist doctrine? There is even a nascent crusade in the UK and some other places to illegalise such enormities. Or does the ethnicity of the participants now weigh heavily in the scales of right and wrong? It is so hard to keep up with ‘woke’ ideology.
It’s always been that way. Remember a few years ago when this sanctimonious twat filmed herself walking through the streets of NYC so she could demonstrate the level of catcalling and vulgarity women have to put up with (which is odd, since most movies and TV shows tell us women are strong, fierce goddesses who can kick the shit out of any male who crosses their path, even if the man in question is two or three times her size)? Turns out she had to heavily edit the video because the majority of the men catcalling her were brown, and she needed to make the offenders mostly white in order to serve The Narrative.
Time was when a White woman or a group of them would purposely walk by a construction site and expect a raucous melody of catcalls from above, in which everyone involved enjoyed themselves. Another charming tradition tossed onto the heap of modern multicultural nonsense.
Are you serious? You might have enjoyed that but no decent woman would.
Getting catcalled by white construction workers who for all their rowdiness would never rape a woman (most wouldn’t even cheat on their wives) is very different from being ogled by feral blacks or Mexicans, I’d presume.
I believe what she (Alexandra) is eluding to is that there was a time, a more normal, naive, and perhaps a bit innocent time, when young white women could be most assured that when she went anywhere in town, dressed in her best, looking her best, walking down the street, that 95% of the men around town would be normal, heterosexual, hardworking WHITE men with healthy testosterone levels and a healthy level of respect for women, but they didn’t mind, and were even flattered, by a “wolf’s whistle” (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf-whistling) or another harmless, non-vulgar gesture of positive male attention.
There was a time, not so long ago, when people knew how to flirt, sometimes subtlety, sometimes a little more aggressively, and it wasn’t considered taboo or wrong for a man to show positive interest toward an AVAILABLE woman. Yes, even white people.
Then the sexual Revolution of the 60s happened and cultural forces started making women demand that they be treated just like men, and not placed on a pedestal. Their role shifted from being a potential love interest, potential life partner, with a well defined gender role to being prudes (outwardly) who are miserable because the only place they have left to get abundant male attention is on social media in the form of “likes” for “selfies”.
Demographics shifted toward multiracial and multicultural and the cultural forces became chaotic, conflicting, unpredictable…so everyone became alienated and lost the art of expressing sexual interest in a healthy, flattering way. The “cat call” shifted from being a harmless whistle or “hey baby!” to vulgar sexual comments, comments about breast size, butt shape, or suggestive physical gestures. In other words, it became negrofied.
So now, white men have been stripped of our ability to demonstrate open interest toward women or compliment them publicly, because white women (most anyway) do not enjoy the unwelcome, vulgar advances of black men. But they can’t just come out and say, “I don’t like vulgar negrolike comments”, because that would be racist, so they’ve declared ALL “catcalling” to be taboo.
In other words, a great deal of the feminist ideas that were injected into our culture between the 60s and the 90s were actually a reaction from white women who were uncomfortable with the growing bravado of black men. Then a tipping point occurred where the fear of appearing racist surpassed their desire to not be harassed by black men, and their entire feminist ideologies became one contradiction after another.
A little after that a woman posted on youtube 10 hours walking in Riga. No catcalls, no insults. One man gives her flowers. Another asks directions. Of course, all the men in the video have something in common, and Riga being Riga she didn’t have to edit it to make it that way.
The British establishment had the opening to generalize after the predation of Wayne Couzens. They might be thinking ahead on the racial contours of London by doing the dog bites man angle. The cops in the UK have to go through so many criminal background checks and psychometric exams that I’m amazed he got through the system into his job. Diplomats, Armed, counter terrorism, serious security level stuff. But, aha he’s a slick cunning total predator covering tracks. The anomalous Case is probably going to be misused as a tool by the political bosses to create diversity with less sneaky rapists and kidnappers shielding their vile schemes behind the badge and counter claims of racism for added alibis.
Fortunately, if this black lady forum is anything to go by, even blacks aren’t buying the oppressed black man angle in this story.
Bunch of based L’Queeshas overe here.
https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/white-man-charged-with-murder-for-shooting-black-man-after-he-complimented-his-girlfriend.4680346/
It doesn’t matter so much that blacks don’t believe it as long as white liberals and Jews, especially such as are likely to find themselves on the jury believe it.
Well said! That’s always been the case. The tribe and the white liberals at their service have created the modern Hell we all live in.
This. Plus black women resent the f*k out of black men who shower their ‘sexual favors’ on White women. They hate the competition and the implicit fact that they are less attractive/desirable, even to their own men (who will, it is widely known, poke just about anyone/anything). Only question I have (the few articles I’ve scanned about the shooting haven’t really specified) is whether or not the girlfriend welcomed/encouraged the black’s attention or was genuinely repulsed. Of course, even if she was, she most likely wouldn’t say because that get her even more publicity and hate. Doubt she’ll ‘stand by her (White) man.’
“They hate the competition and the implicit fact that they are less attractive/desirable, even to their own men”
So? They are calmly speaking the truth in this instance, black women speaking the truth about black men is useful since they are even higher on the oppression hierarchy and no one can cancel them.
Just when you think media gaslighting, retconning and pure deception couldn’t get worst you hear this story. They focus on the guy’s race and “hey, he just gave her a compliment!” You have to read 3/4ths into an article then find out that the shooter had to get a brain scan from the altercation.
It’ll be interesting to see if the self-defense card will be successful in this case. I doubt it. This is more fertile soil for another summer of BLM violence. Blacks have successfully argued self-defense killing whites in more legally dubious situations than this.
But yes, the best thing is to steer clear of situations like this. We’re seeing Kali Yuga tier subversion of the legal system. I like the metaphor of blacks as the new aristocracy. George Floyd is in essence a patron saint. God’s mercy on us all.
“Sexual assault” could mean grabbing a girl’s ass in public, so even if the black guy technically committed sexual assault it might not have been grounds for responding with lethal force.
My guess (and it’s only a guess because no information about the nature of the crime is given in the article) is that the black guy flirted with the white guy’s gf in front of him, and when the white guy told him to f-off the black guy started swinging.
The idea that blacks have high self-esteem is BS. If they get rebuffed or reminded in any way by whites of their social inferiority, they lose it.
If they simply get reminded in any way that there are boundariess you expect them to respect then they’re the same way.
You’re right about the self-confidence; I shudder to think just how consumed any given one of them is, just how much he ruminates on the near perfect failure of his race in the world, desiring to undo it, as he imagines, by punishing ol’ whitey.
Wow, this is really a serious predicament for White men and women both. What if a woman alone is attacked and uses pepper spray which might blind the attacker permanently, or even a small knife that, well-used, could slice a major artery. I think someone above mentioned martial arts training, and that is probably a great idea for all of us. We never thought anything could get this bad in this country — or world — but here we are. We definitely have to plan our lives differently, especially if this case turns out to be the worst possible outcome, much like the ‘Floyd’ case did for Chauvin. This “Blacks First – Right or Wrong” mentality is one of our greatest challenges ever, especially since it has enthralled so many of our otherwise intelligent kin.
This is a good article Mr. Jeelvy, and a good place to post an apt quote I came across. It’s from A Picturesque Tale of Progress: Explorations I, a volume in an eight-volume set of children’s history books published in 1929; It’s from a chapter called “Around Africa to India”:
“Here on the West African coast between the Niger and the Congo, there had dwelt from time immemorial the shiny, black Negro, in all his ignorance and primitiveness. Broad-faced, flat-nosed, and thick-lipped was the frizzly-haired African native. Living ever in a hot, damp climate, he had become listless and indifferent to progress, and forgotten by Europe and Asia; for centuries he and his tribe had lived and died uninfluenced by Mohammedan or European.”
It’s edifying, I believe, to remind ourselves that there was a time when blacks were dispassionately seen simply for who they were (are). They’re deeds and character spoke for itself, which white people overwhelmingly recognized and spoke about openly.
There has been much speculation about the “state of the movement,” what’s happening as people appear to have gone relatively quiet. This site is full of more knowledgeable individuals apropos of White Nationalism, so I tend to just read and absorb, but I’d humbly submit, I believe many people are simply letting their ideas grow irradicable roots, which happens (for me, at least) away from the din, in a quiet mind.
Realism about race has been the norm for the overwhelming bulk of history. And it can be so again, as, for many of us, it already is. I hope things turn out as they should for Mr. Cranston.
Yes, and there’s a whole lot of conservatives that have helped to usher in all this shit.
Even Thomas Hobbes taught that there comes a point where the subject may disobey the sovereign. We have reached Hobbes’ point.
I love how this witless toad put up a meme (I hate using this word) asking what whitey gon do? Hahaha!!!!! It’s a great thing when the natural world shows up. I find this story to be a microcosm of what the government is doing to us everyday. Blatantly and arrogantly disregarding the US Constitution and in basically saying “What the fuck are you gonna do about it Timmy?”
“[T]he media spun it as “a black man shot for complimenting a white woman.” A variant of the Emmett Till saga, Emmett in the highest regions of the Pantheon of civil rights saints. Emmett’s father, Louis, by the way, was executed during WWII for the rape of an Italian woman.
In those days, the execution was probably a mercy. The woman’s family would have probably cut his balls off and fed them to the dogs.
I would suggest a guy should only intervene if the woman accosted is his wife who he’s deeply commited to because he’s essentially putting his life on the line.
This poor fellow, Cranston, will most likely stay in jail till he’s sixty years old, while his girlfriend will get a new boyfriend by next year. Not worth it, imo.
The guy in the twitter screenshot is not the one who got shot for punching and assaulting a white couple. Its maybe OK to point out to this screenshot to highlight some negro racist attitudes towards unavailable white girls with white BFs but saying this is what the deceased tweeted is a downright falsehood.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Edit your comment