262 words
Fróði Midjord’s DECAMERON Film Festival has been going on for close to two weeks now. Fróði and his range of special guests have been discussing the films and shows that light a fire inside our imagination, stories that we turn to for comfort and inspiration during trying times that keep us indoors, whether from ancient plagues or modern viruses. On Friday, Fróði was joined by Jared Taylor of American Rennaisance to discuss the classic Japanese film Harakiri. If you missed that livestream, you can watch the recording of it and past episodes here.
Today, E. Michael Jones will be joining the stream to discuss the controversial Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom. It is certain to be an event you don’t want to miss! Fróði and Jones will be going live this evening, at 24:00 Central European Time (15:00 American Eastern Time) on the official Guide to Kulchur YouTube channel. You can find the stream here, and even set a reminder for yourself when the stream goes live.
Tomorrow, he will be discussing the David Lynch cult classic Twin Peaks with none other than Alexander Dugin. This lineup is truly once-in-a-lifetime, and will make for an unforgettable weekend of culture, critique, and analysis from the Right’s most eminent thinkers.
Make sure to subscribe to the channel so you don’t miss any new videos, and don’t forget to follow the Guide to Kulchur Twitter for updates on DECAMERON and new Guide to Kulchur episodes. You can support the work that Fróði does by sending him a tip through Entropy. Just click “send paid chat.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvIr3VYoAI
3 comments
Frodi and Jared were great!
Bold, provocative, illuminating, funny! I’d never heard Dr. E. Michael Jones before. Or read him: now might be the time to turn to his “history off everything.” What better way to pass the time during the great lockdown. So sexual liberation was really enslavement–just as the “opening of the American mind” was in actuality its closing, Great discussion!
Dugin on Twin Peaks…I don’t know what to feel about that. “Duginist” has become somewhat of a slur on the Dissident Right. However, I think many would agree with his positions on economics, nationalism, anti-liberalism and social conservatism. He even claims to be a Traditionalist in the vein of Guenon or Evola. What seems to separate his pan-Russian Eurasian Movement from our thing is his focus on a forming a Western and Central Asian empire. It’s not really a white movement despite the fact that Western Russians cluster with other Eastern Europeans genetically, quite apart from those of the Southern Caucasus region like Georgians or Armenians or Central Asians like Uzbeks. I don’t think he supports ethnonationalism. Actually, you might say that he is anti-white, or at least, anti-Western Civilization. And I disagree with his pro-Orthodox Christianity, pro-Islam, and pro-Judaism position. I don’t much care for Judaism or its various offshoots, to say the least. Here is a quote from him.
“I am a supporter of blacks. White civilization – its cultural values and false, dehumanizing model of the world, built by them – there were no benefits. Everything is leading to the start of anti-white pogroms on a planetary scale. Russia is saved only by the fact that we are not pure white. Predatory multinational corporations, oppression and suppressing everyone else, besides MTV, gays and lesbians – this is the fruit of white civilization, which is necessary to get rid of. So, I am for reds, yellows, greens and blacks, but not for whites. I’m wholeheartedly on the side of the people of Zimbabwe.”
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.