Counter-Currents
Remembering Kriss Donald
(July 2, 1988–March 15, 2004)
Richard Houck
Kriss Donald
3,170 words
Today I am nearly the same age that Kriss Donald would have been if he was still with us. Kriss was murdered by a Pakistani gang in his hometown of Glasgow, Scotland when I was about to go on spring break during my sophomore year of high school. Kriss was a small teenager: about 125 pounds and 5’7” (1.7 meters) at 15 years old.
I myself had a slight build much like Kriss’ at 15. I mention this because Kriss’ story changed my life in several ways, including inspiring me to take up bodybuilding as a hobby and lifestyle. I thought that if what had happened to him was typical of the types of threats lurking out there in what were once quiet neighborhoods, I needed to change some things. I did everything I could to gain weight: lifting weights, often twice a day, and eating everything in sight. I drank milkshakes with mass gain protein powder, probably over 2,500 calories per shake. Eventually I gained slabs of muscle, but it took years.
Kriss’ murder chilled me decades ago, and it does to this day. It has the same effect on some of my close friends as well, probably because it was one of the first times in our lives when we realized that it could very well have been one of us. We became aware of the dangers in the world, in our nations, and in our cities. We could relate to Kriss. We read the news stories and the court testimony and felt his fear as if it were our own.
The night before Kriss was abducted on a street near his home and killed, Imran Shahid, a Pakistani gang member who had been known to police since the 1990s, was involved in a bar fight with several white men, none of whom had known Kriss. The following day, Shahid and four other Pakistani members of his gang stole a car and went roaming the streets of Glasgow to find whites to attack as “revenge” for what had happened the night before.
The gang soon came upon Kriss Donald and his friend Jamie Wallace, who was then 19, at around three in the afternoon. They jumped out of their car and attacked the two. Jamie managed to get away while Kriss was pulled into the car. The attackers were much larger than Kriss; Shahid was nearly twice his size at around 225 pounds. “I’m only 15, what did I do?” Kriss pleaded with his attackers, according to reports.
What happened over the next several hours remains somewhat unclear. The gang held Kriss captive in their car while driving around, looking for somewhere remote to torture him. They eventually decided on a walking and biking path near the River Clyde, only 15 minutes from the spot where Kriss was abducted. His body was discovered the following morning with over a dozen stab wounds. He was also covered in burns after having been drenched in gasoline and set on fire while still alive.
What happened next is even more disturbing. I remembered hearing further details about Kriss’ death at the time that I could no longer find online, 20 years later. By using web archives and caching, I was able to locate articles that have since been entirely removed from the Web outside of the archives. The full details of what Kriss suffered can be found in one such deleted article that appeared in The Telegraph at the time.
You can buy Greg Johnson’s The White Nationalist Manifesto here
As the gang of Pakis drove around Scotland with Kriss as their hostage, they were smoking and putting out the cigarettes on his skin. His eyes were gouged out, and he was also castrated. Another article notes that his tongue was cut out. Once he was covered in gasoline and set on fire, Kriss crawled about 50 meters along the river, clinging to life, but his body finally gave out. It might have been one of the most horrific evenings anybody has ever suffered.[1]
Two of the five men involved were arrested in Scotland. Three of them, including Imran Shahid, fled to Pakistan, where they would eventually be extradited back to Scotland to stand trial several years later. All five were convicted of crimes related to Kriss Donald’s death, and four of them were convicted of racially-motivated murder. Gang leader Imran Shahid has been placed in solitary confinement off and on throughout his prison term, for his own safety after altercations with other inmates. The Shahid family spent several hundred thousand dollars on legal appeals and alleging that there have been “human rights violations” due to his being kept in solitary.
One of the prison attacks on Shahid nearly killed him. While working out in the prison’s gym, several white men attacked both Shahid and a friend, hitting them with weights and barbells and then stomping on them until guards broke up the attack. Shahid was left in a neck collar for months and needed surgery to repair broken bones. The attack also fractured his jaw and cheekbones and knocked out several teeth.[2]
Kriss’ murder was not the first time that Shahid had committed a violent crime, either. He already had a long and violent criminal history in Scotland, leading to 13 court appearances. Shortly before the killing, he had in fact been in jail for giving another victim permanent brain damage after beating him with a baseball bat. He was released early, leading to the fate that Kriss would suffer.[3]
The BBC only ever mentioned the crime a handful of times and was usually slow to report on developments. Many, including some members of Parliament, contrasted their scant coverage to the non-stop media coverage of Stephen Lawrence, a black teen who was killed in London in 1993. Lawrence, like Emmett Till, became an icon of racism, at least when it was convenient for certain anti-white messaging.
Lawrence and Till only tell a very small part of the frequent story of interracial murders, however, given that such attacks perpetrated by whites are extremely rare. Police officers who were familiar with the Donald case and others like it stated that the incredible power of “political correctness” has hamstrung their ability to curb Pakistani crime and gang activity, in cases such as Shahid’s early release from jail prior to the murder. Further, the mainstream media is not interested in white murder victims, despite the fact that they are being set upon increasingly often by foreign gangs.[4] At one time there were police operations underway to curtail the Pakistani gangs by removing their leaders, such as Shahid, yet the projects were subjected to intense criticism for allegedly being “racist” and were largely abandoned.
We saw this exact same scenario play out again and again in England with the proliferation of white children who were abducted and forced into sex-trafficking operations by foreign gangs. The excuses and cover-ups that were made by the authorities in the Rotherham scandals and the dozens of others like it always followed the same narrative: the police were afraid to arrest foreign men due to fears of being accused of racism. Liberals have quite literally been arguing that it’s better to allow white children to be raped and killed than to offend a race of criminal aliens. In Kriss Donald’s case, it was said at the time that the story was largely being kept out of the national spotlight due to concerns of a “backlash” against the Pakistani community in Scotland and the United Kingdom more generally. This was the first time I heard this sort of refrain, but it has become all too commonplace in the 20 years since. We are often told that when a foreigner does something horrid, the real victims are the members of his community, who might face backlash.
I saw this firsthand when a Somali Muslim student ran over a group of other students and then began stabbing them on campus at Ohio State University. The ensuing discussion was not about how it was possible for a random Somali man to attempt to kill a group of students, but rather about the Somali community in Columbus now likely being afraid of a “backlash.” Shouldn’t they be? Wouldn’t that be the most just outcome? Is it not reasonable to be wary of a group of people who continue to produce rapists, murderers, gang members, and terrorists? These things do not happen in a vacuum. Shahid was part of a vast network of Pakistani associates in Scotland who were involved in drug trafficking, cloning credit cards, robbery, and other forms of “cultural enrichment.” His family also paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for his legal defense. How are they not complicit in the murder of Kriss Donald?
This obfuscation is not limited to immigrants and their protectors in the media and law enforcement, however. Kriss’ own mother, Angela, has spoken about her concern over the murder of her son becoming a political issue, insisting that it was “gang culture” which led to her son’s death, asking that his murder not be used to push “racial division” or Right-wing political causes.
This is a sadly familiar pattern nowadays. The most infamous example is when the father of Mollie Tibbetts, a young woman who was kidnapped and murdered by an illegal migrant from Mexico, used his eulogy for her to apologize to the Mexican community, decry racism, and describe how much he enjoys eating Mexican food. It would be almost darkly comical if this wasn’t such a serious issue. When I first read about what Ron Tibbetts had said at his daughter’s funeral, I thought it was exactly that: a grim joke satirizing the liberal mind. But I realized once again that I had given white liberals too much credit. The mother of Cannon Hinnant, a 5-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a black neighbor, made a similar statement, assuring the public that his death had not been a “race issue.”
The perpetrators of these crimes say that it’s a race issue, however. When Kriss and Jamie were attacked, the Paki gang called them “white bastards.” In his subsequent trial, Shahid stated that he had been specifically on the prowl for white people to assault.
When Emmett Till was killed, nobody suggested that his killers had simply gone looking for a random black person to kill. Till had been sexually harassing Carolyn Bryant, in a similar manner as Till’s own father, who had been executed for committing multiple rapes. Till’s lynching was obviously due to his sexual harassment of Bryant. Yet, the case is constantly held up as an example of “racism” in America.
Similarly, when Trayvon Martin was killed by George Zimmerman, the mainstream narrative cast it as being about racism. Zimmerman, a Hispanic man, was subsequently deemed white enough to be guilty of white supremacism and anti-black racism. Zimmerman had never said anything about race or about wanting to kill a black person, however. When he shot Martin, he was in the process of being badly beaten by him, and even suffered broken bones.
The default assumption whenever a black is killed by a white person — or white-passing person — is that racism is involved. But when whites are killed by other races, it can never be said that race played any role, even when the pattern is abundantly clear. We should always meet all interracial conflicts and crimes against whites with at least an initial assumption that race was a primary factor. We should always ask: “Would the same crime have happened if the victim hadn’t been white?” We should also ask: “Should the perpetrator have been in this country in the first place?” and “Should the perpetrator have had such easy access to whites to prey upon?” Until whites adopt a mindset that is more appropriate to living in multiracial societies, extreme violence against them will continue unabated.
You can buy Spencer Quinn’s novel White Like You here.
A few years after Kriss Donald’s murder, there was a gruesomely similar story in the United States: the murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom on January 6, 2007. The young white couple were kidnapped, tortured, and raped for hours by a gang of five blacks, and then eventually killed. Christopher was raped and killed first. The blacks continued to gang-rape Channon for hours until they tried to cover up their crimes by pouring bleach down her throat and scrubbing bleach all over her body, finally tying her up inside several layers of plastic garbage bags and throwing her into a dumpster, leaving her to slowly suffocate to death. The media, the police chief in charge of the investigation, and even Channon’s father all insist that the crime was not about race, however. Only Newsom’s mother and Michelle Malkin were among a small minority who pushed back against the prevailing narrative, asserting that there must have been racial animus present.
Who are these family members to decide what is and is not a “race issue”? It is tragic that they lost a relative, but this gives them no right or special authority to decide what is political and what is not. They have no special insight into the minds of particular murderers, the races as a whole, or public policy. In short, being a secondhand victim does not entitle a person to shut down discourse regarding a matter of public policy. White people’s safety, especially in historically white countries, is a grave concern. Had the “racists” such people fear been in charge of these nations, none of these murders would have been possible. “Better food,” “higher aggregate gross domestic product,” and the so-called “beautiful mosaic of multiculturalism” are pitiful tradeoffs for frequent racially-motivated violence, high costs of living, and low physical safety in our cities. But this is the trade liberals are forcing us to make.
It is difficult to argue that Kriss’ murder, and so many like it, are not political when it becomes apparent that a proper political authority would have protected Kriss, along with all the others like him. Were it not for measures such as bail reform, early release programs, forced racial integration, and open borders, I find it difficult to believe that Reagan Tokes, Ebba Akerlund, Pat Mahaney, Kriss Donald, and countless others would have been victimized. Further, if their parents or liberals as a whole reject those policies that would have saved these children’s lives, I can see no reasonable way in which they have a claim to their child’s legacy. It means they are willing to sacrifice the lives of their children for a political project that elevates criminals and foreigners over the safety of their own.
Kriss’ killers told the court that they had abducted, tortured, and murdered him because he was white, not because of something abstract or personal. Racial conflict is a matter of human nature. It has always been here and always will be. Groups that are different are always going to be at odds, either due to resource competition or simple cultural differences. This is a reality we can live with so long as we have safe, sovereign nations. What is not acceptable is allowing the members of these differing groups into our nations, ignoring their crimes, giving them our tax dollars, and allowing them to abuse us in the name of multiculturalism, diversity, or liberal ideals. When it comes to the murder of Kriss and all the others like him, there were deliberate policy decisions made at every level of governance, from the national immigration laws to local policing programs, that allowed our people to be set upon by a foreign menace.
The neighborhood where Kriss lived was, and is, a working-class one and very diverse. It is common to see such neighborhoods in the United States as well. Once a trend develops and a such a place begins to be filled with more blacks and browns, more danger and higher crime rates inevitably follow. The whites who can afford to leave will move to a town “with better schools,” leaving the poorer and middle-class whites behind to live with the consequences of diversity. This new underclass is heavily reliant on welfare and crime, receiving benefits from those they victimize in a country that has betrayed its original purpose.
In the 20 years since Kriss was taken from us, what has changed for the better? As far as I can see, all of the factors that led to his torture and murder have only increased. The cities are more diverse and more crime-ridden. The borders are wide open. Whites have become a smaller portion of the population in the nations they built. The mainstream media and academia still sneer at people like us and our legitimate concerns while obsessing over the slightest inconvenience allegedly suffered by a black or brown.
Kriss Donald lived the final moments of his short life on a Monday evening — March 15, 2004 — as he bled to death while burning alive, trying to extinguish the flames by rolling across his hometown’s grass and mud. The man who found his body was not even sure that it was that of a human being, believing at first that it was an animal carcass. Kriss had planned to spend the evening with a friend playing video games after going for a walk through town on an early spring afternoon — a sort of day much like those that I have spent with my own friends on many occasions. But it is the sort of day that Kriss will never again have.
It did not have to be this way.
There is a memorial bench to Kriss on the River Clyde near where he died — alone, in agony, with nobody around to help. Someday I am going to visit Glasgow and take a walk from the neighborhood where Kriss was abducted to where his body was found and see the world for what it is — and also think about what it could have been, and still might be someday.
There’s another world where Kriss is sitting on a bench along the river, perhaps enjoying a cup of coffee and sharing a smile with a friend, or maybe even a wife or child. For now, however, we are all being forced to wander among the ruins of cities that a great people once built. It weighs heavily on me to know that it is too late for things to have been different for Kriss. We can’t change the past, but in some other world, perhaps things will at least be different for those like him.
Notes
[1] Archival sources on file with author. According to several articles that are still online, Shahid instructed members of his gang to bring knives, a hammer, and a screwdriver. Shahid told the gang that he would “chop them up, take their eyes out,” referring to Kriss. See “Now tranquil, the place where horror visited,” The Scotsman, November 9, 2006.
[2] “William Crawford admits jail attack on Imran Shahid,” BBC, September 17, 2013.
[3] Graham Grant, “Mother of race-hate murder victim on her decade of pain,” Scottish Daily Mail, March 15, 2014.
[4] Antony Barnett, “Racial murders: nearly half the victims are white,” The Guardian, October 21, 2006; Imaad Azim, “Row over policing Asian gangs,” The I Witness, January 2005.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
* * *
Counter-Currents has extended special privileges to those who donate at least $10/month or $120/year.
- Donors will have immediate access to all Counter-Currents posts. Everyone else will find that one post a day, five posts a week will be behind a “paywall” and will be available to the general public after 30 days. Naturally, we do not grant permission to other websites to repost paywall content before 30 days have passed.
- Paywall member comments will appear immediately instead of waiting in a moderation queue. (People who abuse this privilege will lose it.)
- Paywall members have the option of editing their comments.
- Paywall members get an Badge badge on their comments.
- Paywall members can “like” comments.
- Paywall members can “commission” a yearly article from Counter-Currents. Just send a question that you’d like to have discussed to [email protected]. (Obviously, the topics must be suitable to Counter-Currents and its broader project, as well as the interests and expertise of our writers.)
To get full access to all content behind the paywall, please visit our redesigned Paywall page.
32 comments
Wow. That was a very, very written, very personal account of the murder. IMO – we need to do as the anti White Lib, Leftist, BLM, J media does in the USA – make saints out of our martyred victims – like the anti White media did with Fentinyl Floyd, Saint (not) George Floyd , Trayvon Martin and of course Emmett Till.
What is the exact day he was murdered, martyred. Exactly where did the murder happen? We need to make this a remembrance day, do marches, candle lit vigils, email, and real mail groups in the community, public officials etc, And yes, make his spirit a saint – like Saint George – the Catholic Christian saint of England who never set foot in England. Saint George was a Christian believing Roman Saint in what is now Islamic Turkey, then part of the Greko Roman, Greece Eastern Roman Empire. Religion, Saints, Martyrs are important – the early Christians knew this, so does the anti White Lib Leftist. The Socialist Nationalists in Germany before the formal outbreak of World War II did a good job of this making saints of martyred fighters like Horst Wessel and Herbert Norkus.
In my opinion the Germans did a rather poor job of propaganda in World War II, they hardly tried to get Eastern European especially Slavic support. Where was Lenni R during this time? Why weren’t there NS German propaganda documentaries showing cheering crowds of Liberated from the Bolshevik Communists, victory in Kiev Ukraine – cheering crowds, pretty Ukrainian women hugging and kissing the liberator German and Ukraine allied troops.
The Germans didn’t propagandize Eastern Europe during World War II because they never intended for their movement to be a pan-European one, even though that is a common misconception. National Socialism was always about ensuring German supremacy and dominance on the Continent. They certainly wouldn’t have made films showing “pretty Ukrainian women hugging and kissing the liberator German troops” given that fraternization between German soldiers and Ukrainian women was forbidden as Slavs were considered an inferior race.
IMO that was huge mistake. Part of my family was Russian nobility – originally Germanic royalty that married in to Russian nobility. The start of my Russian family was Catherine the Great, a German princess married off to the (weak) Russian Czar. There was a coup, led by a German officer Orlov, lover of Catherine and the father of my family – they were both Germanic, Germans in Russia. But the Nordic/Germanic nobility always worked hard to get the loyalty and support of regular (Slavic Russians and others). Catherine the Great was really good, GREAT at that. She covered to Russian Orthodox Christianity, fought the Muslim Turks and clamped down on atheist Communist/Anarchists – ie the Je*s. These are practically things regular Russian Slavic people liked then and now.
The Germans in World War II could have, should have finessed the Germans/Nordics/Baltics vs the Slavs – won the war then gradually did their Germanization, liebensraum. Plus lots of young White Slavic women, then and now are drop dead beautiful – why didn’t the Germans in World War II do like Alexander the Great did in his conquests – wed his most loyal military officers to local royal families?
The Germans did get some, a lot of Slavic support from Croatians and especially Ukrainians. That’s a big factor now in the foolish, another White brothers war Ukraine vs Russia with International Js, and that *RR#&$@ Je* pervert commedian Ukraine President. Regular Ukrainians still think they are fighting the J Soviet Bolsheviks from World War II… NOT!
The Nazis were German Nationalists and not a pan-European movement, yes, but the war forced them to reconsider many things. Bolshevism was a threat to all Europeans except for the Polish colonels, apparently, who wound up in Paris or London. Lesser Polish officers wound up in Soviet mass-graves.
Anyway, war or no war, why wouldn’t Germany become a superpower? That is exactly what Albion wanted to prevent, just as France was once aggressively prevented from being a continental superpower.
Leon Degrelle contradicts you that the Nazis were only interested in oppressing Slavs and preventing German soldiers fraternizing with them. I’ve seen enough German newsreels of Germans and smiling Ukrainian women to know that this claim of non-fraternization is untrue as well.
🙂
All absolutely true. This talk of Germany wanting to dominate and conquer Europe, seeing Slavs as subhuman trash, and so on is all just an extension of Allied anti-German propaganda, and not true to the time or intention of the National Socialists at all.
Find copies of “Europa” and “The Greatest Story Never Told”, you can actively see the respectful way the Germans treated *all* other peoples. For goodness sake they provided excellent medical care even to Jewish prisoners, and would shoot German guards that acted inappropriately even to Jews, people they knew well were impeachable enemies of the German people.
They were fighting for survival and freedom, not to harm others. And not to dominate and control and steal. And again listen to the account of Jewish inmates themselves.. they were able to receive *money* from relatives outside the camps, and spend it in the camps for goods. And the Germans themselves even issued coupons to the inmates that could be used to make purchases, money effectively that came from Germany itself.
Even when the German guards we’re starving (at the very end of the war), if medicine or food was sent from outside of a camp to a Jew, it was given to them.
A side prepared to treat its racial enemies so well, isn’t going to treat another European group worse. And a people that wouldn’t even steal from their own prisoners and criminals, isn’t going to steal from other innocent people.
People need to understand this, cultures *do not* turn on a dime. Think about how well intentioned Germans are today. How honest Germans are known to be, how trustworthy, how honourable. They behaved no different then. You have been sold a bill of lies, and unfortunately while not believing all of them, you’ve believed too many of them.
No, it isn’t Allied propaganda. It is based on actual statements of German leaders, from Hitler on down, and actual policies they implemented. Hitler was very explicit about his plans for Russia, Ukraine, and Poland: they were to be settled by Germans who would treat the natives like the Yankees treated the American Indians.
It’s true that in 1943, once the tide of the war in the East turned against them, the Germans tried to recast their fight as one of Europe against Bolshevism in the hope of recruiting more non-Germans to their armies. But this only happened during the last two years of the war, and it’s pretty clear it was done out of expediency rather than due to a sincere change in ideology. Take the famed “Russian Liberation Army,” which mostly only existed on paper and even the parts that did exist only fought in a couple of actions in the spring of 1945. Many of them promptly switched sides, which suggests they didn’t believe the pan-European stuff, either.
Rescued as a political prisoner from a French dungeon in 1940, the Belgian politician Leon Degrelle joined the Wehrmacht as a foreign volunteer in 1941 with the rank of private. By 1943, the Wallonians have proven themselves and Degrelle has negotiated with Himmler and the SS for their own combat division complete with their own Latin Rite chaplains. (E. Michael Jones says the Nazis were all pagans.) I agree that Hitler never fully trusted the Vlasov Army, but Degrelle says that the main problem was that Germany was never really able to adequately arm itself, let alone interested foreign contingents. Only the first handful of Waffen-SS divisions could even be called elites, for example.
🙂
Regardless, in the fullness of time WW2 has come to represent a war between Whites and Jews for global dominance.
We’d be in a better position had the Whites won. Though that may not have been so good for (some, not all) Slavs.
Hitler’s anti Slav attitudes are consistent with his being the child of an Empire, the Austro-Hungarian, where the Slavs to them were their problem – in the way that, for example, the Irish used to be the big problem for Anglos – which we now find a quaint, desirable state of affairs given our current problems with races far more unruly than the Irish ever were.
I believe that had Germany won the war, the USSR would’ve been dismantled (a good thing in anybodys book) and Hitler would have died a natural death in the 1960s or so, after which a sort of de-Nazification or de-Hitlerification would have taken place, akin to what happened to Stalin (or any other powerful leader) and I don’t believe the remnants of Austro-Hungarian Imperial anti-Slav feeling would’ve held much court.
There’s other White groups the Nazis wouldn’t have or didn’t try to subjugate or conquer or wipe out : Nordic Scadinavians, the French, the Italians, Iberians. They were even allied with the Japanese and by osmosis various Arabs. They were only enemies of the British by a quirk of fate, and the Eternal Anglo being a crypto-Jew.
Slavs were considered an inferior race
That’s wrong. The Slavs were not considered by Germans as an inferior race. German Slavs, Wenden und Sorben, were loyal German citizens and never oppressed. Some Slav countries were allies of Germans, like Slovaks, Bulgarians, Croatians, Bosnians. Occupied Czechs and Poles were oppressed only as hostile nations, and because their resistance (by Poles of course much more than by Czechs) but not because of their “race”. Don and Koban Kossaks were true allies of Germans. The Western Ukrainians were not hostile to Germans. And also there were hundreds of thousands in Vlasov’s ROA and amonge the Hiwis.
Honestly, none of that is inconsistent with extreme anti-Slavic chauvinism on the German part.
It is not hard to find bellicose language in wartime or in the lead-up to war anywhere. This does not prove anything. There was bellicose language about Japs during the war too, although Yockey says that it did not lead to any kind of serious racial dialog in the USA. Propagandists like Dr. Seuss and the ubiquitously-consumed comic books were claiming that you could actually tell bad Japs and good Chinese apart from their gait on the street or footprints in the jungle. Atrocity Propaganda tends to blur rational distinctions, and the Allies were very good at it. European-American Jews also knew right where to poke their enemies for Gentile consumption. Recently, the Guardian ran a little fluff piece on the notorious British Greuelpropagandist Sefton Delmer with a straight face. I’ll bet zero College students today have ever heard of him, but one almost gets the impression that the article was really about Trump and how to beat some kind of Rightwing disinformation campaign. Why else would anybody not want to vote for Hillary or Biden? They stand to fight White racism and for more equality and social justice, don’t they?
🙂
This extremism did exist, mostly from such persons like possible Soviet agent Erich Koch, true, however there were enemies of such politics in the Tausendjährigem Reich, incl. Alfred Rosenberg, but anyway:
it was not against ALL Slavs at all, because not ALL Slav peoples were oppressed and even oppressed were oppressed differentially;
and
it did not have a “racial” character, simply because the Slavs are not a race, but a language family, also the word Slavs is a linguistic, not a racial term. There is no such thing as a Slav race, as there are no French, English or Swedish races. And languages and races are not the same, because if it would be the same, John Lennon and Louis Armstrong would both belong to the same “English” race.
The topic of discussion is the horrific murder of this poor young boy twenty years ago, not the war on the Eastern Front from 1941 to ’45. Please let us show some respect!
Your point being what, Sir? Mr. Kriss Donald ─ and many boys and girls like him ─ are not served by modern governments that have banned the death penalty and who stubbornly maintain open borders for refugees and Brown people. At least they are fighting White racism, right?
🙂
Responding to Scott above as the “Reply” thread’s exhausted.
Yes Scott, the White British have indeed been abandoned by successive governments – I wasn’t disputing that; I just felt that the line of conversation had gone off topic somewhat. You refer to the individual upon whom this essay is based as “Mr Kriss Donald” in an almost sarcastic manner. He was just 15 years of age and not a grown man. He was totally unable to defend himself physically or mentally against the cowardly monsters that took his life. Kriss was hardly more than a child. His time in captivity leading to his unspeakably horrible death would have been truly unimaginable. Yes we need to remember him and others like him such as Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. The righteousness of our anger is in the here and now and it is in this current setting that we have to operate in order to efficiently direct that anger. That German occupying forces in Eastern Europe recruited non-German volunteers eighty years ago is of no immediate, direct relevance. Also, there’s really no need to refer to me as “sir”.
Best Regards,
Liam
Well in a way it is fitting since Kriss Donald wanted to join the army, and while training would’ve been a few years its very likely he’d have done at least one tour of Iraq had he joined the army in 2004 / 05
Many people in that Glasgow Rangers mileiu are patriotic in that sense – spitfire nationalism stuff. Very big into Armistace Day and all that. Tommy Robinson is big on that scene (and when he comes to Scotland often wears a Rangers jersey). The core of the fan base is Northern Irish Protestants; their flag is an English cross with a Star of David (!!!) and the Red Hand of Ulster inside it. I believe the Star of David May have featured on the crest of King Billy (William of Orange). Holland was jewed up to the max at that time before the Jews got on the new grift which was the newly formed hideous enterprise that is Great Britain.
There’s a big link between British nationalists, Ulster loyalists, Rangers, the Freemasons, the Orange Order, Jews, and the British Army, and thus, world war 2 and all that.
I don’t mean to seem like I’m being callous at all – I’m scottish myself and I’m horrified by this murder. I remember it at the time and I remember the sheepish silence from the usual suspects. I’m simply pointing out facts.
As for the “Sir” thing that’s just a thing Americans do. See the Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse skit of the overbearingly friendly American tourists.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BGc3zFOFI-s
There’s also a skit where the Americans meet a full burka wearing Paki (or a “letterbox ninja” as I heard them being described once, by a big Rangers/Orange Order guy actually):
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sEEx3oUuiII
Replying to Unlucky as “reply” thread once again exhausted.
Thanks for your reply. I didn’t know that Kriss Donald wanted to join the army on leaving school. I was aware that many Scottish recruits support Glasgow Rangers FC with its strong connections to British Unionism and admiration for the armed services along with their traditions and history – the First World War commanding a particular reverence.
I’ve no doubt you’re just as horrified by the boy’s murder as anybody else, particularly as you’re Scottish yourself, along with the fact that the news coverage was minimal compared to that given to Stephen Lawrence (but saying that, I mentioned the case of Kriss Donald to a Scot a short while after his murder and he was completely unaware of it!).
Perhaps if one follows an extremely tenuous retrospective historical logic, it could be argued that if Britain hadn’t gone to war with Germany in 1939, then Kriss would have been spared his hideous fate, as mass coloured immigration into Europe followed in the wake of the Second World War and was indeed partially a product of the conflict.
Also thanks for the link to the highly amusing Harry Enfield sketches
Liam, I agree with you that discussions often needlessly go off topic, although I don’t think any harm is done. Probably the more discussions, the better.
I was merely trying to give the young Mr. Kriss Donald, or “Mr. Kriss” as we Americans might say to a youngster, the respect that he deserves.
As far as calling people, Sir. Yes, Americans often do that. However, I was once a Non-Commissioned Officer in the U.S. Army, and if and when people called us “Sir,” the usual response was to playfully say, “I’m a sergeant, no need to call me, Sir. I work for a living.”
🙂
The White men who attacked Shahid in prison are heroes.
We must dismantle Jewish Supremacy to ensure that no one is ever again sadistically tortured as Kriss Donald was.
First of all, this is a beautifully written article that captures the melancholy of our situation, the horror of Kriss Donald’s murder, the nostalgia for our better past and a reason to make a brighter future for our people in our homelands. You did this dignity and respect. Well done.
As far as being twenty years on, the situation is far more grim. For Hamza Yousef standing in the Scottish Parliament and with rage, vitriol and hatred denouncing the entire government for being too white is a day where the anti-white Pakistani gangster is now in power. Worse, he was annointed by whites and just days after that anti-white tirade he was rewarded with the premiership of Scotland. On his acceptance he had the gall to wear a kilt, after being sworn in wearing the traditional Muslim/Pakistani garb of his real homeland.
Politicans can profit from crime. We know Yousef is anti-white. He is now emboldened by the entire Scottish government bending the knee to him after he announced his intentions and hatred for all of them on racial grounds. Yousef was annointed after a liberal minster was found with hacked up bodies on their property. Something malevolent is afoot in Scotland and in our homelands.
In the name of Kriss Donald and every Scotsman who ever held their sacred homeland’s ground we must turn the tide. The same is true for all of our homelands.
Say their names.
Restore their honor by restoring hours.
Restore our homelands.
Restore our rule at our hand with our law.
God Bless you for writing such a beautiful essay.
‘Yousef was annointed after a liberal minster was found with hacked up bodies on their property.’
Would assume you’re talking about the police attending ex First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s home. No bodies were found. That’s just pure rubbish. She and her ‘husband’ (she’s a closeted homosexual) would be in jail right now if there had been human remains there. Sighing here.
And once again I am reminded of how my brother was taken from my family by a murderous black female and two black male accomplices. All because he was possibly going to testify against the bitch’s boyfriend regarding a robbery. It didn’t even make it to trial because a junior prosecutor screwed up. I’ve never felt the same about blacks since then. And I’ve had good friends who were black in my particular avocation of basketball reffing. But it’s gotten more and more difficult to sit quietly and let our country be dismantled by aliens of all kinds. I feel honored that I found CC and a few others that provide a forum to vent with like minded and skin toned souls.
The very street Donald was abducted from was in 2021 the scene of a protest of several hundred people stopping the police from deporting 2 men who were in the country illegally as their visas had expired :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenmure_Street_protests
The protest was a hodge podge of white Leftists and the various ethnics who make up the South of Glasgow. In this case mostly South Asians,but also various other groups including a lot of Roma Gypsies.
This was a big win for the Scottish Left and Independenists: see the BTL comments on this article which sums up these attitudes pretty well:
(Warning in advance: reading these inane comments might make you lose brain cells. I wonder if they’re even real people, or just bots.)
https://www.thenational.scot/news/19316181.home-office-vows-deport-indian-men-freed-dawn-raid-glasgow/
For them it was an opportunity to show how much more welcoming Scotland is than England, how much less racist.
While it must be noted the Kenmure Street Indian guys aren’t criminals, at the end of the day there’s rules about emigrating and you ought to follow them (plenty of white brits are kicked out of various countries for not having active visas). But it isn’t really about that. It’s what it represents; a big thumbs up to the nonwhite future and a big thumbs down to remembering Kriss Donald. Imagine there was outrage on that scale for him. But there wasn’t. It was sheepishly ignored by the Scottish and British establishment, and treated like an anomaly. It was the first ever racially motivated murder in Scotland. And supposedly the Irish were a big problem?
The irony of that is quite bitter, and at the end of the day the death of Donald was the clash of civilisations on a small, personal scale. The reason they killed him was they had a clash with a different ethnicity and sought revenge against someone else of that ethnicity. The different ethnicities don’t get along, or at least, don’t get along well or often enough to share living spaces.
It’s like quibbling siblings: separate rooms is the answer.
I used to live near Peterborough, England in the 90’s and ten days after 911 happened, a Paki gang in that city decided to find a White person and kill them. His name was Ross Andrew Parker (19 August 1984 – 21 September 2001). He was stabbed to death for being White.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Ross_Parker
First, this is an excellent eulogy of the author’s friend. It is also a challenge for us to do something to stop this sort of thing that has sadly become commonplace. But I am afraid that we are now a herd of prey animals in which most of the members escape the predators, and are free to continue munching. And we’ve got plenty of bread, circuses, and candy to keep us plump and amused. Chances for success in a bloody revolution are just about nil, so why rock the boat? Just don’t go out on the edges of the herd.
Liberals and Jews are frequently cited as the cause of this state of affairs, but I don’t think they outnumber us. Political orientation is most likely distributed in a bell curve with similar numbers at the extremes. They have just done a better job of coaxing the herd, which began to move in their direction, slowly at first, after women gained the right to vote. Could the politics of victimhood preached by liberals have appealed to a male electorate? Would a society ruled by normal men celebrate, even tolerate flagrant sexual perversion? On the other hand, most of civilization might now be smoldering ruins after a war whose cause nobody could explain, if men made all the decisions.
You really outdid yourself with this one, Rich.
In 2018 PM Teresa May announced “Stephen Lawrence Day” to memorialize a murdered black teen. And Lawrence’s mother was made a “baroness.” Nothing similar was ever done for Donald.
Thank you for writing this and for remembering him. His family wanted to hold a vigil and made enquiries about something permanent to mark the spot of his abduction. They were told no by the council and anything that was erected would be removed. A measure of the progressive beasts we are dealing with.
They were even allied with the Japanese and by osmosis various Arabs.
And there were also Eastern Legions in Wehrmacht, consisted of Soviet Caucasians and Asians (Northern Caucasians, Georgians, Armenians, Azeri Türks, Özbeks, Türkmens, Qazaqs, Qirim and Idel Tatars. Bashkorts, etc.) Among the last defenders of Reichstag were Kalmyks, Asians and Buddhists.
Richard, remembering Kriss Donald and his cruel death is highly appropriate as Easter approaches. You are much the same age as Kriss and the circumstances of his end inspired you on a path of self-overcoming and improvement. Given the relatively scant publicity given to the case in relation to that of Stephen Lawrence even here in the UK, how did you find out about it given that you are based in the US ? Were you involved in nationalist politics back then as teenager ? Yes you should visit Glasgow. I’ve been about three or four times and there are some lovely examples of Victorian Gothic Revival architecture – Glasgow Necropolis is really quite spectacular.
Yesterday, I posted a comment underneath’s Jim’s recent essay regarding the life-threatening attack on Kaylee Gain outside a St. Louis high school. A few commentators stated that she got what she deserved as she was very probably in an inter-racial relationship, given that her school is 95% sub-Saharan African in composition. That unfortunate young girl couldn’t get away from her attackers, just as Kriss couldn’t avoid his. In my comment, I mentioned a conversation I had with someone who was part of “the movement”. The individual in question more or less said that Kriss Donald was wigger white-trash who probably mixed with non-whites and therefore got what he deserved. Is this some kind of coping mechanism? Dehumanise members of your own people by looking down on them because they come from the wrong side of town and throw them under the bus?
You make a good point, one with which I am only partially sympathetic. As a movement, we have limited resources, even emotional resources. Does a White female who never crosses the color line deserve more of our sympathy than one who does? I think so, but that doesn’t mean we have no sympathy, either. It just means whatever sympathy one might have for mudshark is probably wasted as she would reject White Identity Nationalism in favor of Negro Worship.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment