Counter-Currents
Jews Are Not White People (a Response to a Response)
Spencer J. Quinn
Dennis Prager
2,140 words
Recently, Jewish conservative Dennis Prager made the commonsense argument that Jews should quit supporting Leftist causes because the Left, as he says, “is not our friend.” His piece, which appeared in the Jewish Journal on August 31, describes quite clearly how leftist radical organizations such as Black Lives Matter, MoveOn, Code Pink, and others reject not only Israel’s right to exist, but also the rights of Israel-supporting Jews to be part of these organizations.
Yet Left-wing Jews continue to support them. Prager gives the example of prominent Jews such as Leonard Bernstein and Sidney Lumet who lent their support to the Black Panthers in the 1970s despite knowing what violent thugs the Panthers really were. But this love for left-wing causes, as Prager points out, “has never been reciprocated. The left (not traditional liberals, it must be noted) has been Jew-hating (and later, Israel-hating) throughout its history.”
Okay, terrific. Of course, Prager neglects to mention the deleterious effects the Left has had on white gentiles as well. Hopefully, such an argument would not be completely lost on the readership of the Jewish Journal. Either way, however, I find it fair to say that if all Jews were to emulate Prager and cool it with their Left-wing obsessions, then anti-Semitism (from the Right at least) would be somewhat alleviated. Much of dextral anti-Semitism these days stems from traditional-minded, race-realist whites who cannot help but notice prominent, influential Jews acting so energetically against white racial interests while remaining quite jingoistic about their own. I believe that Dennis Prager, who, as far as I have seen, has always been even-handed with white gentiles, is shining a light into a dark place, which is the endemic weakness diaspora Jews have for socialism. It makes me sad when I consider how lonely and dim that light is compared to the vastness all around it.
Such pious melancholy met its abrupt end, however, when I read the stunning retort to Dennis Prager published in the Jewish Journal just one day later. It was entitled “Jews Are Not White People, or Why Jews Support the Left (a Response to Dennis Prager),” authored by Tom Teicholz. Honestly, I don’t know whether to be offended by Teicholz or to thank him for his candor. Essentially, Teicholz is not afraid to acknowledge the very things that white, judeo-criticial gentiles have always known: that A) Jews see themselves as racially distinct from whites, and B) Jews “always agitate for and support causes of the left,” which, of course, is tantamount to opposing the racial interests of whites. Teicholz, whether he knows it or not (and I seriously doubt that he does), gives anti-Semites almost everything they have ever wanted in a piece written by a Jew.
Never have I discovered so much Truth and Stupid in a single article.
First of all, Teicholz’s opinion piece quite cleanly illustrates the double standard found in the liberal media, which is mostly run by Jews. If Kevin MacDonald were to pen an opinion piece entitled “Jews Are Not White People, or Why Jews Support the Left” he would be excoriated as a racist and anti-Semite. Points A and B above are two major themes found in nearly every chapter of MacDonald’s famous 2002 work The Culture of Critique, and for this he gets labeled an “extremist” by the Southern Poverty Law Center. While it’s nice to see people on opposite ends of the political spectrum agreeing for a change, it would even be nicer if the powerful Jews in the media who can ruin careers and lives with the “E” word would apply their moral standards more consistently. Tom Teicholz just characterized Jews as a bunch of racially distinct Leftist agitators. Is he not also an extremist like MacDonald? Or, perhaps, since there some truth to what he is saying, we can absolve both Teicholz and MacDonald of extremism. I know how the Jewish Journal feels about the former since they decided to publish him. I guess we’ll have to wait and see about the latter.
Secondly, Teicholz’s main argument is utterly ridiculous. He claims that because Jews remind themselves during Passover that they had been slaves in ancient Egypt, they must today identify with American blacks because American blacks had also been slaves. Hence, Jews must support all sorts of black causes and look the other way when that support is not reciprocated. As he puts it:
Our support is not a two-way street, or an all or nothing proffer. The Torah does not hold others, particularly those we support, to the same standard as it does Jews.
Doesn’t Teicholz realize that he is characterizing Jews as drones who follow ancient traditions most uncritically? This is remarkable given how Teicholz obviously finds such an unflattering assessment to be a good thing. Doesn’t Teicholz also realize that white Christians have also been slaves? More recently than Jews, I might add, and I am not just talking about ancient Rome. According to two studies, M.A. Khan’s Islamic Jihad (2009) and Robert C. Davis’ Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters (2003), between 2.75 and 3.75 million white Europeans were abducted and sold into slavery in the Ottoman Empire by Barbary pirates or Crimean Tatars from 1450 to 1800. That is a hell of a lot more than the 400,000-odd black African slaves transported to North America since the 16th century. It’s more than the number of black or Muslim slaves brought into Europe during the same time period as well. Teicholz should also realize that the trans-Atlantic slave trade wouldn’t have happened if there weren’t already thousands of black Africans who were more than willing to capture and trade their human cargo for silver or ivory or whatever it was that served for money back then. And this says nothing of the black African slave owners who still exist today.
So, does this mean that Jews are obligated to “identify and support the cause[s]” of white Europeans? According to Teicholz’s tortured logic, it would.
Third, Teicholz claims that diaspora Jews support Left-wing causes because Jews do so much better under Left-wing regimes than Right-wing ones. Here is his argument:
How have Jews fared under the right? Far worse. In Egypt, or under the Greeks and Romans, in Spain and Portugal under the Inquisition, in Europe during the Reformation, in France at the time of Dreyfus, or in Hitler’s Germany or his Reichlands. Consider the fate of Jewish lives under right wing governments in Hungary or Poland – are they better off than they were under leftist regimes?
I don’t see how anyone can pin ancient, medieval, renaissance, or reformation-era anti-Semitism (if you can even call it that) on “the Right” since this concept originated during the French Revolution and didn’t really attain the meaning it has today until the mid-19th century. Yes, things were dreadfully bad for Jews under Hitler, but they weren’t much better under the ultra-Left-wing Stalin. According to Louis Rapoport’s Stalin’s War Against the Jews (1989) Stalin killed around 1.5 million Jews through executions and deportations to the gulag. He was also preparing to annihilate nearly all Soviet Jews at the time of his death. Yes, Teicholz is correct that Right-wing, nationalist movements in places like Hungary and France engaged in anti-Semitism. But what about fascist Italy and imperial England which were also highly nationalistic and conservative? These places had lots of Jews but very little anti-Semitism.
Fourth, Teicholz doesn’t seem to understand Jews very well. By linking Jewish liberalism to Passover and the Torah, he seems to think that religiously pious Jews are the ones taking up Left-wing causes, when in fact it’s the secular or Reform ones mostly doing this. Conservative, religious Jews like Dennis Prager vote Republican more often than not and, if they are not already in Israel, pretty much want to be left alone. On the other hand, Marx, Trotsky, Freud, Boas, Zinn, Alinksy, Chomsky, Soros . . . how many of these men and others like them observed the Sabbath and kept meat apart from dairy? Not many, yet they did more to harm Western Civilization than almost anyone by chipping away at the racial, cultural, familial, and religious cohesion of white people. As MacDonald pointed out many times in The Critique of Culture, Left-wing Jews with the will to power tend to abjure their religious ties but accentuate their ethnic or racial ones. In other words, like Teicholz, they identify as Jews, not as whites, and therefore tend to place their own priorities higher than the priorities of their host populations. And this often results in cynical alliances with non-whites who have similar anti-white agendas.
In places like pre-World War II central Europe and Czarist Russia where violent anti-Semitism was a fairly common occurrence, this kind of behavior may seem reasonable. In places like the United States or most of Europe since the war where violent anti-Semitism (at least from whites) is as rare as hen’s teeth, it most certainly is not.
This leads to my final point, Teicholz tips his hand and unwittingly reveals his utter contempt for whites. And since he claims to be speaking on behalf of the majority of Jews and is given a platform for this contempt by a site called the Jewish Journal, we have to conclude that many Jews share this contempt. Note how Teicholz reflexively considers the cause of blacks and other non-whites to be just:
Jews will always agitate for and support causes of the left, because we are commanded to be a beacon unto others and to see social activism and seeking Justice.
Atrocious writing aside, why does Teicholz find Left-wing causes of black Americans to be necessarily just? It can’t be because they are black. That would be tautological. It can’t also be because American whites oppress blacks today. With a black president and ubiquitous affirmative action and a strong black presence in our mainstream culture, they obviously don’t. Furthermore, high black crime and illegitimacy rates coupled with low black academic achievement can sufficiently explain the relative lack of success blacks have in America and other places.
It also can’t be because whites have oppressed blacks in the past. Teicholz neglects to determine if there were good reasons for this oppression. Blacks as a group have always shown tendencies towards violence, impulsiveness, and shiftlessness. These are unfortunate truths, yet truths nonetheless. Furthermore, in the absence of conclusive genetic evidence (which we still do not have today), it is perfectly reasonable to assume that this is just how black people, in the main, are. When confronted with millions of such people within your borders, as late-19th century white Americans were, something had to be done to prevent these people from dragging civilization into a more barbarous state. That something was oppression, i.e., segregation, Jim Crow laws, and the like. People like Teicholz, of course, find such measures repugnant because they presume an equality between black and white which does not exist. They also fail to see how humane such measures were compared to the alternatives, which were mass-murder (as practiced against millions of black slaves by the non-white Muslims) or mass deportations (as practiced against millions of ethnic minorities by the non-right-wing Soviets). Many of these Soviets, it needs to be said, were Jews.
American whites resorted to neither alternative, and instead tried to work it out with blacks in a manner which benefited the largest number of people while reflecting the manifest biological differences between the races. For this they deserve credit not scorn. Yet scorn from Teicholz and many Left-wing Jews is all we get.
There is no reason for this scorn except for one: racism. Vicious, closed-minded, anti-white racism. This is the core of Jewish liberalism. This is why Jews tolerate gross anti-Semitism from the non-white Left. This is also why philo-Semitic conservatives, even race-realist realist ones like John Derbyshire and Jared Taylor, win so little Jewish support. They’re white, you see. They are tainted. There is nothing they can do to redeem themselves other than renounce their own whiteness; to commit racial suicide, essentially, which is something many liberal whites readily aspire to do. I really believe that if all Right-wing, race-realist whites were to disappear tomorrow, Tom Teicholz and much of his readership would not be too broken up about it at all. At least not at first.
So let me conclude with a plea to the liberal, Left-wing Jews who may be persuaded by Mr. Teicholz’s arguments. Please listen to Dennis Prager. Please. It will be better for everyone if you lose your absurd negrophilia and europhobia and begin to show more respect for conservative whites who are the majority in and founders of the great nations of Europe and North America. Since World War II, Right-wing whites have exhibited remarkable restraint in their attitudes towards Jews. Even the ones who don’t particularly like Jews, such as Pat Buchanan or Jean-Marie Le Pen, have had positively benign attitudes when compared to Right-wingers in the past. You can also look at the Alt Right today. Despite whatever snark and criticism they may or may not lob at Jews, what leading light in the Alt-Right openly hates them or calls for violence against them? Not Taki. Not Brimelow. Not Taylor. Not Spencer. Not Vox Day. Not Molyneux. Greg Johnson, the editor Counter-Currents, recently described himself as an anti-Semite and a Zionist. He also swears off violence. You know what that means? That despite his differences with Jews, he respects their right to live and the right for Israel to exist.
Can you honestly say the same for many Left-wing organizations out there? These are people who openly discriminate against Jews and condemn Israel. These are people who cheer or equivocate whenever Palestinians attack or murder Israelis. And it’s only been getting worse with all this anti-Semitic BDS business happening on campuses these days. Barack Obama, a man 78% of Jews voted for in 2008, even called for Israel to return to its 1967 borders. How is that not inviting more death and destruction onto Israel? And this says nothing of all the Muslim organizations Left-wingers currently have truck with. Many of these people want to wipe Israel off the map for starters.
Do you really want to keep siding with these people against whites? Indeed, when compared to such rabid Jew haters, conservative, race-realist whites are the least of your worries. Above, I mentioned how some whites were committing racial suicide. Keep it up with your Left-wing obsessions and the only people committing racial suicide will be yourselves.
Enjoyed this article?
Be the first to leave a tip in the jar!
27 comments
Great article. I can not recall any writings while studying political science at the university being as mentally thrilling as some of the contents here at Counter Currents.
Yeasterday there was a seminar at the bar were I work. The theme was “Why is Stockholm breaking apart – segregation in modern Sweden”. The speakers included one communist, one ill spoken young Arab woman who had some page on Facebook, one professor who wanted to sell a book about rich people, one other professor in infrastructure who get paid by a liberal and heavily Jewish organization, and a handful more people. Conclusion of their debate: The problem of Stockholm is racism and the presence of to many white Swedish neighborhoods. I found it all utterly stupid. The current mindset here is undoubtedly dangerous for whites future.
The audience, however, included a number of Jews and they really enjoyed themselves. I do not think they will ever take our side, no matter how beneficial it could be for them. I think they will only take their own side.
Thank you, Alexander. I worked very hard on this one. That was a very sad story you related. I wish one of us could have been there to give them a piece of our mind.
Jews (and blacks) are so blinded by their hatred and envy of Whitey that they can’t think straight.
For example, take Colin Kaepernick’s claims of America being a racist oppressor State. It’d be hilarious if it weren’t so infuriatingly untrue. In this case we have a multi millionaire mulatto afflete who’s black daddy was granted access to the oppressors’ young fertile womenfolk AND allowed to neglect his responsibilities of fatherhood without consequence. Kaepernick’s whore of a mother abandons her sinful creation and the child is then adopted by a middle-to-upper class family of oppressors where he is given a life that many of us weren’t privileged to experience. Next, because Kaepernick possesses the ability to run-fast-throw-ball, he is granted all expenses paid access to attend one of his oppressor’s institutes of higher learning thus granting him access to a guaranteed multi million dollar contract and highly lucrative endorsement deals advertising consumer trinkets to the oppressor peoples. Eventually, it turns out that he can’t run fast enough nor throw ball accurately enough and is demoted but still compensated just the same. Finally, after having gotten all he could from his oppressors and now with nothing left to lose he feels a sudden compulsion to let his inner-ungrateful-nigger shine through his thin oompa-loompa orange skin and stand up to da man. Apparently his oppressors must be suffering a shortage of rope and trees and whips and fire hoses and German Shepherds because they haven’t gotten around to treating him in a mean fashion or even reneging on his employment contract. In fact, many of his oppressors argue in defense of his “right” to disrespect the oppressor State’s history, traditions, national ensign and people. Boy, almost makes me wanna be oppressed. No wonder we’re seeing hwytes like Rachel Dolezal appear on the scene. For poor wittle Colin, orange IS the new black.
This nicely sums it up, but let me point out that in America in the year 2016, facts don’t matter. We’ve reached that point. That this is due to technological civilization made possible by white males also doesn’t matter.
What matters is: what can you get away with. What do you want to say and how loudly do you want to say it.
In effect, this spoiled quarterback is achieving a level of fame that even his apparently professional level athletic skills cannot give him. It’s the same thing with black lives matter. I’m not a negro in the ghetto anymore! I’m on TV now!
All of us are after the same thing now: our 15 minutes of fame before this whole thing comes down. Struggle to get on a lifeboat and paddle away? That’s too much work.
Growing up in New York, Jews were as natural as sunrise to me and throughout my life I have had all sorts of good interactions and relationships with individual Jews, who can be not only smart and funny, but very kind and generous. So letting myself see the damage that Organized Jewry does was not easy.
Ironically, Dennis Prager helped. In one of his articles about the mass apostasy of Jews from Judaism to Utopian Leftism after Emancipation, he pointed out two constants: 1. that they will always fight against any notion of (non-Israeli) nation that is based on actual blood/kinship links and 2. that they carry a powerful loathing of Christianity in all its forms, no matter how Jew-friendly.
I still judge individuals as individuals but I am far more aware of the real locus of power: groups.
Jews are the sworn enemy of the white race. Look at what they did to Germany and Russia, look at what they are doing to America, the UK, and France now.
They are killing your country and you sympathize with their intelligence and their “generosity” (it’s easy to be generous when you have millions in stolen wealth).
The question is, what is more interesting? The psychology of the Jew, or the psychology of a white person who doesn’t care about his own people?
Keep in mind that “appearing friendly” is part of the strategy of Jews living in a Gentile society which they intend to exploit, control and eventually destroy. “Friendly” and “funny” Jews don’t alarm the gullible goy (until it is too late).
Dr ExCathedra, I always try to live by the following mantra: Never judge a person by his race, but always judge a race by its persons.
While I consider some Jews to be White (perhaps not Nordic) in the same sense that Mediterranean and Southeastern Europeans are – that is, while some admixture has certainly occurred, the phenotypes still qualify as more or less European – it’s clearer with each passing day that from functional and practical standpoints, they need to be considered either non-White or perennially anti-White concerning aspirations of and strategies for the White race moving forward.
Dov, I will bet that if you put the question to them, they will tell you.
Jews will always try to subvert their host nations and especially the white nations because they see the white nations as obstructing them in their world-ruling destiny. The following quotes from the Unholy Bible are just a sample, but they give a good idea of the Bible’s obsession with the destiny of the Jews as world-rulers and their entitlement to a terrible ‘revenge’ on all other nations.
“Let people serve thee, and nations bow down to thee” Genesis 27:29.
“This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear report of thee, and shall tremble, and be in anguish because of thee.” Deuteronomy 2:25.
“For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth.” Deuteronomy 7:6.
“and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt rule over many nations, but they shall not rule over thee.” Deuteronomy 15:6.
“the Lord thy God will set thee on high above all nations of the earth” Deuteronomy. 28:1.
“And all the people of the earth shall see that thou art called by the name of the Lord; and they shall be afraid of thee.” 28:10. “And the Lord shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only and not beneath.” 28:12f.
“Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.” Psalm 2:1-3.
“Ask of me and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth” Psalm 2:8ff.
“for the Lord most high is terrible; he is a great King over all the earth. He shall subdue the people under us, and all the nations under our feet.” Psalm 47:2f.
“For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles” Psalm 54:3.
“Arise, O God, judge the earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations.” Psalm 82:8.
“He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries” Psalm 110:6.
“Let the high praises of God be on their lips, and a two-edged sword in their hand; to wreak vengeance on the nations and to chastise the heathen: to load their kings with chains and put their nobles in irons; to execute the judgement decreed against them – this is the glory of all his faithful servants. O praise the Lord.” Psalm 149:6-9.
“This is the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this is the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations.” Isaiah 14: 26-27.
“For the indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and his fury upon all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered them to the slaughter. Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcases, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood.” Isaiah 34:2-3. “For it is the day of the Lord’s vengeance, and the year of recompences for the controversy of Zion.” Isaiah 34:8.
“that men may bring unto thee the forces of the gentiles, and that their kings may be brought. For the nation that shall not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.” Isaiah 60:11-16.
“See, I have this day set thee over the nations and over the kingdoms, to root out, and to pull down, and to destroy, and to throw down, to build, and to plant.” Jeremiah 1:10.
“though I make a full end of all nations whither I have scattered thee, yet will I not make a full end of thee:” Jeremiah 30:11.
“For I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee” Jeremiah 46:28.
“And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep: who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. Thine hand shall be lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all thine enemies shall be cut off” Micah 5:8f
Thank you for taking the time and effort to provide that list of quotes. It’s difficult not to conclude that anti-nationalism and anti-traditionalism are simply Jewish misanthropy applied to the political domain. Indeed, as William Joyce put it:
‘The supreme fact of world politics today is that the Jews want no nationalism but their very own.’ (Twilight Over England, page 101 of 108).
True in his time, and true in ours.
High quality articles really are the norm on CC. This is an excellent analysis, and yet…it seems to me it rests on a wrong premise, which is that Jews CHOOSE to do what they do, they CHOOSE to be anti-white, and can therefore choose not to do it.
If your plea is made in good faith and not meant rhetorically, I find it very optimistic, to say the least.
The most intelligent Jews don’t push anti-white strategies because they think about it, anymore then the dumbest SJWs do. They may formulate astute strategies in terms of the “how”, of course. But no matter how articulate they may be in the rationalization of the “why”, their motivation is rooted in something much deeper than ideology: it is rooted in biology.
Kevin Alfred Strom recently published a 4-part series making the case that Jews are – biologically – a parasitic organism of Europeans. Not of Africans, not of the Chinese or whatever. Of Europeans. As a whole, they are compelled to weaken and oppress Whites in the same way that a healthy male is compelled to seek sexual contact with pretty young females. They don’t choose to do so; it’s a built-in automatic mechanism of the most fundamental level. This is why they seem to be so damn good at it: they actually have an INSTINCT guiding them, in the sense of innate impulses resulting in advantageous behaviors that don’t require rational or even conscious deliberation.
This argument is not new of course, but these articles drove the point home for me in a way no other author quite had before. The whole series is well wort reading. Especially noteworthy is the hypothesis that the events of WW2 drove organized Jewry to behave much more aggressively, to the point of turning into a parasitoid, which “…unlike a true parasite… ultimately sterilizes or kills, and sometimes consumes, the host. Thus, parasitoids are similar to typical parasites except in the more dire prognosis for the host.”
http://www.kevinalfredstrom.com/2016/08/its-all-biological-part-1/
I’m not a scientist, and I don’t know if everything he says checks out; however, this biological model seems to describe/explain the reality of our predicament far better than any historical or social model. Therefore, I must disagree with what seems to be an implied assumption here that any sort of “arrangement” can be reached with Jews living in White societies. They do what they do, because they are what they are. You cannot negotiate DNA. Eventually, they will always fall back to their basic survival strategy, one that has proven highly successful so far. The only acceptable arrangement for us is complete separation.
Thank you, Renzo. I think Jews are like any other people in that there is a bell curve-like continuum describing traits. On one end, you have the minority that fiercely dislikes gentiles. On the other, you have the minority that respects us. In the middle are the ones who just want to live their lives. This may be partially genetic, I don’t know. The unfortunate thing is that those Jews that are A) part of the diaspora, and B) have the will to power tend to cluster at the former end. The Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s and Paul Krugman’s of the world. People like Dennis Prager are on the latter, respect-the-gentile end, which is why I respect him, even if I don’t always agree with him.
Thank you for replying, Spencer. What you say is very reasonable and reflects my experience as well. The reason I say separation is the only acceptable option is that there are, on the other hand, ways in which Jews are NOT like any other people, most prominently the fact that they are traditionally a nomadic or semi-nomadic tribe, bound to be a small minority in their host society, with all that entails (high in-group preference, endogamy, paranoia and preventive aggression, increased social and strategic awareness, etc).
Combine that with above-average intelligence, financial astuteness and ruthlessness, and the whole “Chosen People vs. Cattle People” thing (which again, could conceivably be hard-coded in their DNA as a successful survival strategy), and you have a uniquely dangerous group of people.
Moreover, it is impossible to separate the peaceful ones from the aggressively parasitic – and take the necessary precautions – in any way I would consider safe for us. As long as you have a Jewish community in White countries, well, you’re going to have that bell curve, and you’re going to have that toxic minority. Besides, if it IS genetic, the whole group would have evolved to function AS A WHOLE. Obviously, not every single Jew will have an anti-white agenda. Indeed, there are even some that explicitly take our side. And yet, the community as a whole – its mere presence – will always support the work of their most dangerous schemers.
Not every single bullet-ant in a nest will rush to attack a perceived threat; only a minority of exceedingly big and aggressive workers will. It is still a terrible, terrible idea to host a nest in your back yard.
I once read an issue of “Instauration” – I think – where someone described Jews as parasitic down to their DNA.
Was from the late 70’s. Strom is really making headway, here. Any day now the wrathful Saxons of the forest will awaken and realize the evil Jews have been herding them like aphids for two millennia.
“Eat our dust, Jews!”, as Linder croaked.
Great articles here at counter-currents. Am new to alt-right, gotta thank Killary for pointing me here. As a once upon a time progressive liberal with most of my friends still in the fold, I am struck by how strong the thought matrix of moralist, pro multiculturalism is. People are absolutely locked into this view. The entire MSM is parroting this line and my wife is buying it hook, line and sinker.
I do see the alt-right rising and I am on board, but the matrix is absolutely smothering. I want to imagine a breakthrough, but don’t think that will happen unless our society crashes and resets. People are just too dulled out and propagandized to change much. It’s only when they’re hurting, will they think about standing up.
So in the meantime I’ll enjoy all the articles and deep thoughts and noble goals, but I don’t see any real change until we have a series of catastrophic changes. We are too far down this globalist road to be able to tweak any beneficial changes. War is coming, plain as day. See you on the other side.
I am also new but already a donor to this site. We can change everything. Just imagine what can be done in the next decades. Who would 50 years ago have thought that white countries would become what they have becomed? Today we do not at all know what the year 2066 will be like. That is encouraging. Sky really is the limit. Whites just got to see that it is morally justified for us to exist and survive. Jewish hegemony is fighting like crazy to keep us in decline and itself in power, while we are only just beginning to find ourselves again after what hit us. I am very optimistic. It is unlikely that whites just lay down and die out in coming centuries. Greetings!
Andy, I think you are absolutely right.
That is great. I was in same boat as you a year ago – thanks to refugee invasion through my lovely country. You are correctly deducting that war is inevitable and also that we will win this war.
But I started to truly understand our movement after I HONESTLY answered following two questions. 1: Assuming ever increasing travel and prosperity, if white countries kept our pre world wars immigration and racial policies (racism) would our countries still be white in 1000 years? 2: Where would white nationalism movement be today if there was prosperity (if globalists didnt export our jobs and bankers scamed us with central banking fiat currency), no multi-culture and no clear agenda to genocide us?
My answers were 1: probably not, 2: probably nowhere. And implications of those answers are shocking if we are to believe all that Greg is trying to teach us.
Jews in general did fare better under extreme left/communist regimes: Poland, Hungary, Romania, f.e., compared to the same countries under right-wing/fascist regimes in the 1930s and 1940s. The Soviet-Union was the first state to officially outlaw antisemitism, which raised tons of Jewish sympathy for communism word-wide. And at least until the Stalinist purges of the late 30s a substantial part of the ruling Soviet elite was Jewish. There were however also right wing regimes that were not antisemitic, for example Franco’s Spain.
True about the early Soviet period. But Stalin made things real hard on the Jews by the mid-30s. During the war, as the Germans were invading, he deliberately told many Jews in remote areas of Ukraine nothing about the final solution so they would be easy pickings when the Germans arrived. Many of the Soviet Jews taken to the camps could have been evacuated. Also, Stalin was apparently really offended when Golda Meir showed up in 1948 and got tremendous support from Soviet Jewry. He had them marked for extinction at that point and was planning to deport the vast majority of them to the gulag by the time he died.
It goes without saying that Ukrainians, Kulaks, and many central Asian Caucasian people died by the tens of millions in the 1920s and 1930s through deportation, execution, or deliberate starvation (to say nothing of the Red-White Civil War), and Stalin had not only plenty of Jewish lieutenants like Lazar Kaganovich who were all-in on this, he also had thousands of lower-level and very eager Jews doing his dirty work. Jews were also instrumental in managing the gulags. Louis Rappaport (whom I believe was Jewish) said in the 1980s that Kaganovich had more blood on his hands than any other living person.
It’s no wonder that Germans found the Ukrainians so ready to assist them in their Final Solution.
One of the most tragic and shameful periods in human history.
“People like Teicholz, of course, find such measures repugnant because they presume an equality between black and white which does not exist.”
I think they believe that we are all equally goy, but they view some goys as being in a more similar position to Jews throughout history, ie being in an out-group. I think that Jews are perverted to view white gentiles and blacks as being the same from the outset, but it’s that sort of perverted thinking that has enabled Jews to stick to themselves through the centuries. I don’t view all Jews as being the same. I doubt that Sephardic Jews could do the sorts of things that their more intelligent Ashkenazi cousins have done throughout history. Ashkenazim and Sephardim are close genetically and somewhat close phenotypically but think about how much more ridiculous it is for liberal Jews to view a white and a black as being the same when they are radically different genetically and phenotypically. What a bunch of nutcases!
I want to profusely thank the author of this piece. This is the best piece on this topic I’ve read. If only more people understood this and were willing to say in the way you do. Please keep saying these things!
I’m Jewish but have always considered myself white. I only began to consider myself Jewish more when I began exploring the right and found that Jews were being conceptually separated from white people. Jews tend to more strongly identify as Jewish when they feel under threat. Let me hasten to add I agree with Prager entirely and Teicholz not at all, but I also am not typical of most American Jews, being a paleocon and strong European identitarian sympathizer.
I understand why people think Jews can’t be part of the alt-right and quite frankly I don’t want to be part of it since one of its goals (in its more extreme manifestations) appears to be to expel me from my country of birth. But, the European far right and the more moderates make no such threats and I consider them allies. Regardless, and this goes for Greg too, please understand some of us are STRONGLY ON YOUR SIDE. Not because of what is in it for us, but because we identify more with you (white Europeans) and because you need to win this for all of our sakes.
I wish I could sign my real name to this but I have no desire to be on an ADL or SPLC watchlist.
Here is a YouTube vid where Morgan Freeman and Mike Wallace (who is Jewish) are talking about Black History Month.
They get to talking(.10) and Morgan asks Mike,”Which month is White history Month?”
Mike stutters and spluts and is taken aback and replies” but I’m Jewish”
which seems to exclude him from the White category.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s
An interesting and thought-provoking piece. The author displayed sound reasoning and dissection of some fairly convoluted and entangling concepts and phenomena. Yet for all his sound reasoning and sharp argumentation, I couldn’t help getting a strong impression that he was trying to curry favors with some section of the Jewish community, trying hard to win their heart and understanding, to convince them of the benefit of siding with us, and to win them over to our side with tireless and very patient and kid-glove persuasion. I understood he did all this for the goodness of the cause of White Nationalism, but if I’m allowed to express my honest and candid opinion from my humble intellectual capacity, I’ll call it a pointless, futile and thankless undertaking. Period. Sorry for being blunt.
Comments are closed.
If you have Paywall access,
simply login first to see your comment auto-approved.
Note on comments privacy & moderation
Your email is never published nor shared.
Comments are moderated. If you don't see your comment, please be patient. If approved, it will appear here soon. Do not post your comment a second time.
Paywall Access
Lost your password?Edit your comment